-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
1/202
Table of Contents .
Acknowledgmentsi
PrefacexvIntroduction1
Chapter 1 HIT!"ICA# P$"P$CTI%$ A&' A'%$&TIT
!"I$&TATI!& Historical Perspective to (eneral Christolog)*
eventh+da) Adventist !rientation,-
Chapter II TH$ CH"IT!#!( !/ $##$& (!0#' HIT$ A Historical
ketch of $llen ( hite2* Contextual /actors in Approaching her
ritings*, $llen hite3s Christolog)*2 The Pre+existence of Christ**
The Incarnation and &ature-4
The Incarnation and in5, Incarnation and (race16, Christ and
$schatolog)165 An Interpretive Anal)sis of Three Problem Areas in
$llen hite3s
Christolog)112 $valuation and Criti7ue141
Chapter III TH$ CH"IT!#!( !/ $##$T 8!$PH A((!&$" The
Historical Context129 The Christolog) of $. 8. aggoner1*, The /irst
Period1*, The econd Period1-4 The Third Period15,
$valuation and Criti7ue,,2
Chapter 1% TH$ CH"IT!#!( !/ $'A"' H$PP$&TA## Historical
:ackground,49 Three alient Aspects of Heppenstall3s (eneral
Theolog) ,2; The Christolog) of Heppenstall,-- The Person of Christ
,-* The ork of 8esus Christ ;6; A :rief Anal)sis of Heppenstall3s
Christolog) ;15 $valuation and Criti7ue of Heppenstall3s
Christolog);,6
1
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
2/202
Chapter % TH$ CH"IT!#!( !/ H$":$"T '!0(#A A :rief #ook at
the
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
3/202
organi?ation in
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
4/202
dialogue and discussion within the church hat relationship is
there between theChristolog) of Adventism and its sense of mission
and its soteriological message
The Problem.oon after &ew Testament times the earl) church
began to reali?e thetheological problem of Christ. Against the
background of the monotheism of 8udaismhow should the relationship
between 8esus Christ and (od the /ather be seen 'id$bionism and the
teaching of Adoptionism have the best answers To acknowledgeonl)
the humanit) of Christ and to recogni?e the impartation of special
powers at His
baptism when He was adopted b) the /ather would maintain the
uni7ueness of (od!r did the answer lie in 'ocetism as the humanit)
of Christ simpl) amanifestation and an illusion Perhaps Christ was
the one (od of the universemas7uerading as a human being but in
fact onl) being (od. Then again for a periodit appeared as if
Arianism with its subordinate Christ might have the answer to
theproblem of Christolog). However= the church at &icea D;,2
A.'.F took its standagainst Arianism and pronounced Christ as 3vere
'eus3 and 3vere homo3.
ubse7uent to &icea the church was to wrestle with the
problem of the relationbetween (od and man in the f igure of 8esus
Christ. Theologians grappled with theproblem and set forth
differing solutions. /inall)= Chalcedon gave its verdict on
therelationship between the two natures in the one person of 8esus
Christ. CanChalcedon be considered the end of the controvers) or is
it in some respects onl)the beginning of a further dialogue
Limitation.A thorough stud) of all Christological development
within Adventism from1944 to the present would prove a far greater
task than is possible within the scopeof this dissertation. The
areas of concentration will= therefore= have to be delimited.
ithin Adventism there is general acceptance of the pre+existence
of Christ as wellas His participation in creation. There were
variant views on Christ and the Trinit) inearl) Adventism but toda)
there is agreement that Christ is of the same nature andsubstance
as the /ather. The 7uestion of the eternit) of Christ is also a
settled issueand Arianism is reected. e will= therefore= not
concentrate on these areas.2
!ur special field of concentration will be the incarnation. And
even here the virginbirth will not detain us long. In the
Incarnation was 8esus Christ trul) (od How wasHis divinit) affected
b) the Incarnation hat of the kenosis hat was the natureof His
humanit) hat of the doctrine of the two natures in one Person How
did sinaffect the humanit) of Christ Is the sinlessness of Christ
viewed in sinless or sinfulhuman nature hat of $bionism and
'ocetism and is Christ to be viewed 3fromabove3 or 3from below3 The
whole 7uestion of the nature of 8esus Christ in theIncarnation will
demand our attention.
As the person and work of Christ should not be divorced=3 we
will seek to discoverhow Adventism has viewed soteriolog) in the
light of its Christolog). And this latterarea will be largel)
confined to Christ3s work in His life= death and resurrection.
Methodology.This dissertation is written in the area of
dogmatics with specialemphasis on apologetics. The Christolog) of
Adventism will be criticall) anal)?edand examined while at the same
time viewing it against the background of theChristian church as a
whole.
A dissertation of this nature could approach the problem
chronologicall) from 1944to the present= or thematicall)= taking
important themes in the Christologial field andholding them up to
the light of investigation= or the problem could be studied in
thelight of certain selected Adventist representatives.
In this case we wish to combine these approaches. /irstl)= we
have selected fourwriters and theologians or closer scrutin). The)
are $llen ( hite= $llet 8.aggoner= $dward Heppenstall and Herbert
'ouglass. A chapter will be devoted toeach one and their
Christolog) will be criticall) examined. econdl)= thechronological
approach will come into pla) as the first two writers will occup)
thelatter half of the 15th centur) and the last two the period from
1526 to 1596. The
thematic approach will also be used as we confine the research
to limited themes inChristolog) for each writer.
In this dissertation maor emphasis will be given to the
presentation of evidence fromprimar) sources. &ot onl) will the
maor works of the four authors be studied= buthundreds of
periodical articles written b) these theologians will be used.
Pamphletsand other documents= both published and unpublished= will
also form a part of theevidence.
The Christolog) of the four writers will be compared and
contrasted and will also bebrought into relation with
Christological views in the Christian church outside ofAdventism.
The great church councils of &icea and Chalcedon will be points
ofreference but it should be remembered that the ultimate norm to
test an) Christolog)
must be the criptures of the !ld and &ew Testaments. hile
some cripturalreferences will be used in presenting the Christolog)
of our four representatives= itwill not be possible in the scope of
this dissertation to criticall) test theseChristologies against
this norm. uch a stud) awaits the attention and research of)et
another seeker after truth.
1 @arl :arth= Dogmatics in Outline= #ondonE C< Press= 15**=
p.**EBThat iswh)...Christolog) is the touchstone of all knowledge
of (od in the Christian sense=the touchstone of all theolog).B
Gback
4
http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac-intro.htm#2%232http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac-intro.htm#2%232http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac-intro.htm#3%233http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac-intro.htm#1!%231!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac-intro.htm#1!%231!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac-intro.htm#2%232http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac-intro.htm#3%233http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac-intro.htm#1!%231!
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
5/202
2 $vidence will be cited in the first chapter for the above
assertions. Gback
3ee ( C :erkouwer= The Person of Christ= (rand "apidsE m. :
$erdmans=15*5= pp.161+116> P T /ors)th= The Person and Place of
esus Christ= ;rd edition=(rand "apidsE m. :. $erdmans= p.*> '
8onker= Christus! die Middelaar=PretoriaE & ( @erkboekhandel=
15--= b1.1-; .Gback
Chapter One
HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND ADVENTIST ORIENTATION
In this first chapter attention will be given to two obectives.
The first will attempt tooffer some perspective to the intricate
histor) of Christolog)= whereb) the readerma) be reminded of the
overall sweep of the subect. The second obective will be
tofamiliari?e the reader with a brief orientation into the
Adventist theological milieu.
I H!"t#r!$a% Per"pe$t!&e t# Genera% Chr!"t#%#'(
The purpose of this first section will be to offer a suggestion
whereb) the vastcomplexit) of the histor) of Christolog) ma) be
reduced into five broad categorieswhich can serve as a background
to our detailed anal)sis of Adventist Christolog). Itis not m)
intention to present a chronological outline of the histor) of
Christolog).!thers have applied themselves to such a task and=
furthermore= this would fallbe)ond the scope of the present
dissertation.
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
6/202
representative of truth than to confuse Him with the substance
of an unknown 3(od3.Thus we can see that while these categories are
not to be confined to watertightcompartments= the) do reflect
consecutivel) the five dominant approaches in thehistor) of
Christianit) from the first centur) to modern times.
A Ont#%#'!$a% Chr!"t#%#'(
It now becomes 7uite eas) to place certain Christological
movements and trendsinto their appropriate categor). /or example=
most of the Christological controversiesand subtleties of the earl)
centuries and the middle ages ma) be classified asontological b)
nature. This is true whether we think of the threat of docetism
orebionism> or of the accommodation of or of the adoptionistic
tendenc) ofd)namic monarchianism> or of the conflict concerning
the concept 3homo+ousios3 and3homoi+ousios3 precipitated b) Arius
of #aodicea. 'espite the wide differencesbetween each of these
schools of thought the) all represent examples of
ontologicalChristolog) because in each case the attention is
focused on the 3being3 and3essence3 of Christ. The historic
declaration at &icea D;,2 A.'.F remains a monumentto the
ontological struggles in the Christolog) of the earl) centuries.
3
#ikewise= the mental and logical agilit) of men like
Apollinaris= $uth)chus and
&estorius)
were devoted to the arena of ontological debate within
Christolog). !nemoment it would appear as if Christ was trinitarian
in nature> then the next momentHe was set forth in one unitar)
nature> onl) a little later to be split again into two
co+existing persons= namel)= the $ternal #ogos and the -in the
"eformation thinking of such men as#uther and Calvin= .and even in
the kenotic theories and proposals.1/
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
7/202
radical form. /or
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
8/202
0nder the skillful scalpel of :ultmann=
dem)tholo+gisation)2became a furthercharacteristic of existential
Christolog). /or him the s)noptic tradition is a productand
proection of the needs of the earl) church known as
#emeindetheologie.:ultmann proceeded to this earl) theolog) and to
la) bare the essential element ofdecision concerning man3s
self+understanding. The message of the Christ of faith issubected
to an existential interpretation which means that it is understood
inanthropological terms. Thus the connection between the historical
8esus and theChrist of faith can onl) be described in its
existential application.
:ultmann sees salvation as man coming to his right
Selbst$erstndiaand thishappens when he responds to the call which
comes to him through the ker)gmaticproclamation. In the message of
8esus Christ= (od has acted eschatologicall) andthe message of the
faith communit) becomes the vehicle for him to come to adecision.
:ultmann reduces the work of Christ to His Bcall to repentanceB
andChristolog) finds its kernel in what He is for us DpronobisF. In
existential Christolog)there are strong leanings towards a
functional Christolog). In fact= existentialChristolog) is closel)
tied to anthropolog) and lies ver) much closer to a functionalthan
to an ontological Christolog).
In all t)pes of existential Christolog) the actual being of
Christ and His identit) ofsubstance with the /ather loses its
importance. 8ust sufficient of an BimplicitChristolog)B in 8esus
must be accepted to believe in the Bexplicit Christolog)B of
theearl) communit) to act as a vehicle for this bearer of (od3s
presence to make impactin the mind and heart of man. And thus as
the gospel is proclaimed= man will bebrought to a point of decision
for (od and will be able to discover his true identit)and his
meaning in existence and communion with his fellow man.
E Fn$t!#na% Chr!"t#%#'(
e have alread) defined functional Christolog) as that t)pe of
Christolog) whichfinds meaning and significance in 8esus in
functional terms rather than in theintricacies of the language of
substance and essence. In contrast to the ChalcedonChristolog)= the
uni7ue significance of 8esus is not to be sought in something that
is
before= above= or behind 8esus3 human realit). 8esus has uni7ue
significance and isnamed on of (od because He is a human being in a
uni7ue= exemplar) wa). In Hishuman realit) He is as it were
sacrament= ephiphan)= manifestation= image=corporeal expression=
event= presence of (od in the highest and unsurpassablewa).
/unctional Christologists would generall) feel uncomfortable
with classicalChristolog). There could be man) reasons for this and
@laus "einhardt hasadvanced three.)3The first obection is that
traditional Christolog) is essentialist= thatis= Bit speculates
about the essential constitution of the person of 8esus= and in
doing
so forgets His significance for the histor) of salvation.B))A
second obection is thatclassical Christolog) b) starting Bfrom
aboveB presupposes belief in the trinitarian(od and explains the
figure of 8esus in terms of an Incarnation of the divine #ogos.It
is felt that such a Christolog) cannot reall) arrive BbelowB at the
histor) of 8esus of&a?areth. The third obection offered is the
dualistic starting point of traditionalChristolog) with its
two+natures doctrine.
hether one is looking at /riedrich chleiermacher=)*the father of
the modern
movement= or at one of his present sons or daughters= the usual
characteristic offunctional Christolog) is that it is approached
3from below3 and 8esus is regarded asthe true= exemplar)= new human
being. &ot that all Christologies which commence3from below3
necessaril) end up den)ing the essential divinit) of Christ.
&ote= forinstance= Pannenberg= who while developing his
Christolog) 3from below3)+holdsthat the ground of 8esus3 uni7ueness
lies in His divinit) and divine onship.
In what one might term the new Christolog) as opposed to
Chalcedon Christolog)=contemporar) theolog) is attempting a number
of approaches to throw light on8esus3 uni7ueness. Amongst these are
the experience of human existence= theexperience of the world in
its universal development and the experience of histor)./unctional
Christolog) is characteri?ed b) at least the first two
approaches.
In the first approach 8esus is regarded as the Protot)pe of
human existence and Heis looked upon either as the example of love
and devotion=),or as the Bwitness offaithB)-in a godless world or
as one who identified full) with His mission.).Here8esus is seen
either as stimulus and example or as the absolute protot)pe in
whomidea and individual are one. !ne ma) ask whether the uni7ue
significance of 8esuscan reall) be maintained b) onl) accepting His
exemplar) humanit) or His humantranscendence It is evident that
these Christological approaches which regard8esus3 divine onship
onl) as an BexpressionB of His humanit)=*/or see in 8esus
therepresentative of the absent (od*1who vindicates (od3s cause
because (odHimself does not intervene= would find it difficult to
do so.
In the second approach 8esus is regarded as the BlastB
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
9/202
fulfills the role of (od without partaking of an) supernatural
characteristics>*)or evenas the revelation of (od without=
however= partaking of His essential essence orbeing.**
An) serious consideration of functional Christolog) toda) must
take into account theimportant works b) $dward chillebeeckx= the
"oman Catholic theologian. /or himthe starting point of an)
Christological reflection is the man 8esus. His esus
an%&'eriment in ChristologyD15-5F and Christ the Christian
%&'erience in the Modern
(orldD1596F are works that will have a permanent place in the
Christological arena.
/unctional Christolog) is ver) attractive to the modern mind of
the twentieth centur).It is able to discard man) of the hellenistic
concepts thought to be existent in theclassical formulations of
traditional Christolog). In the functional categor) Christ
canremain full) human= and supernatural or metaph)sical
explanations for His missionbecome unnecessar). (od reveals Himself
in 8esus Christ as His revelation= Hispartner= His representative
and as His ideal man. This man becomes the leader=example= pattern
and model for all other men. The life that He lived= the faith that
Hemanifested can be revealed b) others who show the same faith in
(od. His humanachievement is a trailbla?er for all humanit) and if
others would rel) on divine poweras He did the results would be the
same. The life of 8esus Christ could be re+duplicated a thousand
times b) those imbued with His spirit and b) those following inHis
footsteps. /unctional Christolog) appeals to the reason of modern
man andmeets the scientific and evolutionar) concepts of our
time.
&ow that we have taken this short ourne) into the realm of
general Christolog) b)wa) of these five routes= we are now read) to
look at the Adventist theologicalscene= preparator) to taking a
further ourne) into the more particulari?ed world ofeventh+da)
Adventist Christolog).KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
1 ' 8onker has basicall) divided Christolog) into the two broad
categories ofontological and functional Christolog) with various
shades in each. ee ' 8onker=Christus! die Middelaar= PretoriaE
& ( @erkboek+handel= 15--. cf. 8ohn
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
10/202
human nature of Christ receives divine attributes or that His
divinit) partakes ofhuman properties. "ather= each nature
communicates properties to the one Personof Christ while the two
natures remain unmixed. In this wa) Calvin could teach thatwhile
Christ was a babe in :ethlehem He at the same time= through His
divinit)= wasruling the universe with His /ather D )bid.= p.491F.
This view has become known asthe 3extra Calvanisticum.3 #uther3s
interpretation of the 3communicatio idiomatum3was that each nature
does in realit) receive properties from the other nature. In
thiswa) #uther teaches the ubi7uit) of the human nature of Christ
and that in the
sacrament of the supper Christ3s human presence is with us
having received thepropert) of omnipresence from His divinit). Dee
article O= 3The Hol) upper of our#ord=3 in the Augsburg Confession
7uoted in Creeds of the Churches= $d. 8 H #eith=revised edition=
"ichmondE 8ohn @nox Press= 15-;= p.-1F. /or Calvin this concept
isimpossible. Gback
1/The modern father of the kenosis doctrine was (ottfried
Thomasius who in hisB:eitrge ?ur @irchlichen Christologie=B D1942F=
proposed a partial la)ing aside of thedivine attributes in Christ.
Another form of the doctrine was offered b) Th. A #iebnerwho
proposed a complete la)ing aside of the divine attributes in the
kenosis. A thirdform was propounded b) /ranck who believed that
8esus in the kenosis laid asidecompletel) His divine existence.
:ishop Charles (ore of $ngland was an importantrepresentative of
the modern kenosis doctrine in the earl) ,6th centur). He was
particularl) interested in stud)ing the human consciousness of
Christ during theIncarnation and came to the conclusion that Christ
lived entirel) on the level of thehuman. /or an overview of the
histor) of the modern kenosis movement see8acobus 8ohannes onl) in
this wa) can we askabout his divinit). How the divine #ogos= the
econd Person of the Trinit)= would bethought of apart from the
incarnation and thus apart from the man 8esus completel)escapes our
imaginationB Dolfhart Pannenberg= esus - #od and Man= #ondonEC<
Press #td.= 15*9= p.;2F. 8onker suggests that while Pannenberg
approacheshis Christolog) 3von unten=3 he ma) be considered as
belonging to the categor) ofontological Christolog). Dee 8onker=
Christus die Middelaar= bl. 11,F. Gback
13ee his whole approach in his work on Christolog). alter
@asper= esus theChrist= #ondonE :urns and !ates= 15-*. Gback
1)e refer the reader to ' 8onker= Christus die Middelaar.
Gback
1*&ote the observation concerning !rigenE BThough conscious
of a staunch fidelit)to the historic faith= he felt it essential
that the contents of the creed should at thesame time be sublimated
b) the methods of reverent speculation= provided onl) thatthe
limits of ecclesiastical and apostolic tradition were recogni?edB D
infried Corduan=
10
http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#9!%239!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#10!%2310!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#10!%2310!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#10!%2310!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#11!%2311!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#12!%2312!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#13!%2313!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#14!%2314!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#15!%2315!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#15!%2315!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#16!%2316!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#16!%2316!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#17!%2317!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#18!%2318!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#18!%2318!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#19!%2319!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#20!%2320!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#21!%2321!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#21!%2321!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#22!%2322!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#9!%239!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#10!%2310!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#11!%2311!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#12!%2312!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#13!%2313!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#14!%2314!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#15!%2315!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#16!%2316!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#17!%2317!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#18!%2318!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#19!%2319!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#20!%2320!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#21!%2321!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac01a.htm#22!%2322!
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
11/202
BHegel in "ahner= A tud) in Philosophical Hermeneutics!5 "ar$ard
Theological*e$ie6= %ol. -1= 15-9= pp.,92+,59> Hans @ung=
Mensch6erdun, #ottes! %ine%infuhr7ng in "egels Theolo,isches Denken
als Prolegomena /u einer k7nftigenChristolo,ie!/reiburg= 15-6.
Gback
2)In man) respects Tillich is a theologian who stands Bon the
boundar).B Dee B D)bid.=p.5-F. Amongst the milder opponents of the
book was &eander who= while
recogni?ing that the book would be a danger to the church=
appealed for an answerb) argument rather than b) arbitrar) banning.
Gback
3/The fictitious B#ives of 8esusB of :ahrdt and %enturini at the
end of the 19th andbeginning of the 15th centuries= first attempted
to appl)= with logical consistenc)= anon+supernatural
interpretation to the miracle stories of the (ospel. ee
chweit?er=The 8uest of the "istorical esus= pp.;9+4-. Gback
31chweit?er writesE BThe) were eager to picture Him as trul) and
purel) human= tostrip from Him the robes of splendour with which He
had been apparelled= and clotheHim once more with the coarse
garments in which He had walked in (alileeB D )bid.=p.2F Gback.
32 &ote the value that chweit?er places on this critical
investigationE B/or thisreason the histor) of the critical stud) of
the life of 8esus is of higher intrinsic valuethan the histor) of
the stud) of ancient dogma or of the attempts to create a newoneB
D)bid.= p.,F. Gback
33)bid.= p.;11. Gback
3)ee @ "ahner= BChalkedon+$nde oder AnfangB Das +on/il $on
Chalkedon= ed.b) A (rillmeier and ll :acht= %ol. III= r?burg= 1524=
pp.;+45> BProblems of Present+da) Christolog)=B @ "ahner!
Theological )n$estigations= %ol= I= :altimore= 15*1.Gback
3*ee $ @semann= B'as Problem des historischen 8esus=B
9eitschrift f7rTheolo,ie und +irche= %ol. 21= 1524= pp.1,2+12;. /or
the relation of the new to theold 7uest for the 8esus of histor)=
cf. " lenc?ka= #eschichlichkeit und Personseinesu Christi.Studien
/ur Christologischen Problematik der "istorischen
esusfra,e!#ottingen= 15*-. Gback
3+@semann= while following in the footsteps of :ultmann= called
for a drasticreversal from ker)gma orientation to histor) of 8esus
interest. Amongst Catholicswho took up the challenge mention must
be made of H 0 von :althasar= :reuning= H @Jng= H
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
12/202
Hulsbosch= $ chillebeeckx= P chooenberg= C 'u7uoc= and 8 (alot.
AmongProtestant theologians we mention @ :arth= H :raun= / :uri= (
$beling= $ /uchs= /(ogarten= $ 8Jngel= 8 @asper= $infahruno in den
(lauben= H 0rs von :althasar= B/idesChristi=B in ponsa %erbi=
$insiedeln= 15*6= pp.42+-5> ( $beling= Bas heisst(laube=B (%=
,1*= TJbingen= 1529> B8esus and /aith=B in ord and /aith=
pp.,61+,4*> 'as esen des Christlichen (laubens= 8 C :
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
13/202
:efore focusing on the particular Christological problems in
Adventism we need toobtain a larger overview of the movement in
order to more correctl) evaluate thesignificance of the parts to
the whole. e plan= therefore= to firstl) obtain a picture
ofAdventism as it sees itself in the religious spectrum of the
times. econdl)= we willtrace briefl) the highlights of the
Christological development within eventh+da)Adventism. Thirdl)= we
will pause at the specific Christological problems that havearisen
and show wh) the) have caused tension. #astl)= we propose to give a
reasonfor the method of research and the choice of the four
representatives that we have
chosen.
A A7&ent!"8 a" !t "ee" !t"e%
eventh+da) Adventism sees itself as a part of the Christian
church standing in thetradition of the Protestant "eformation and
having its roots running clear back to the&ew Testament.*+There
is evidence that the movement considers itself as a restorerof old
truths and a 3repairer of the breach3 in the law rather than as
some fringe cultbent on startling the world with the 7ueer and the
bi?arre.*,
eventh+da) Adventists believe that the heart of their message is
8esus Christ andHis atoning death on the cross. !ne well 7ualified
to speak wrote the following
wordsE
BThe sacrifice of Christ as an atonement for sin is the great
truth around which allother truths cluster. In order to be rightl)
understood and appreciated= ever) truth inthe ord of (od= from
(enesis to "evelation= must be studied in the light thatstreams
from the cross of Calvar). I present before )ou the great= grand
monumentof merc) and regeneration= salvation and redemption + the
on of (od uplifted onthe cross. This is to be the foundation of
ever) discourse given b) our ministers.B*-
The movement believes that it is to proclaim= along with other
Christians= the $ternal%erities to a world lost in sin. According
to #ero) $dwin /room= these $ternal%erities Bembrace the basic
principles and provisions for the salvation of men= asspringing
from and centering in the three persons of the (odhead= or
Trinit).B*.The)
are eternal because (od is eternal. The) encompass ever)thing
needed to carr) outthe sacred covenant + the Incarnation= Christ3s
sinless life and vicarious= atoningdeath= resurrection and priestl)
mediation and His glorious return. Central to theseverities is
Christ3s spotless righteousness with which He clothes and
transformssinners. Component factors embrace regeneration=
ustification= sanctificationthrough the Hol) pirit and
glorification. All of these are rooted in (od3s love=
grace=compassion and power. These are the con7uering provisions to
overcome sin and tobanish it from the universe. Thus= for /room=
the $ternal %erities are simpl) the$verlasting (ospel in essence
and operation. eventh+da) Adventism has beencalled to proclaim
these essentials to the world.+/
/room has also demonstrated in his Pro'hetic
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
14/202
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
15/202
increased his ecumenical stature..,The :ible Conference of 152,
gave dueemphasis to a Christocentric approach in the church3s
re+evaluation of dogma. .-
It is difficult to understand theological discussion within
Adventism during the period152,+1591 without reference to "obert '
:rinsmead...Although on the fringes of theofficial church his
impact has been significant. His soteriological message during
the15263s and 15*63s was built on the traditional Adventist
framework of the sanctuar)motif and embellished with ultimate
perfectionism in the end time. 1//Along with this
went a view of the sinful human nature of Christ without the
practice of sin.Traditional Adventist support could be found for
his thesis.1/1
:rinsmead3s views were seen as divisive and the official church
opposed aspects ofhis soteriolog) along with his
Christolog).1/2Adventist theologians like Heppenstalland 'esmond
/ord1/3advocated the sinless human nature of Christ and
thecontrasting sinful human nature of man which would remain until
glorification at thefinal eschaton.
In 152- Adventists published the book 8uestions on Doctrineas a
result ofecumenical consultations with a group of non+Adventist
scholars.1/)This book waslargel) the work of #ero) /room= alter
"ead and "o) Anderson. Although not
approved b) an) official committee of the church it did have
general exposure toman) Adventist minds.1/*It was an important
watershed for Adventist Christolog).Adopting a classical
ontological Christological stance the book has been
widel)distributed amongst non+Adventists. It has helped to dispel
the fears of evangelicalsregarding Adventist Christolog) but as the
)ears have passed it has also served topolari?e Adventist thinking
between so+called traditionalists and reformationists.
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
16/202
Pauline expression representing the imputation of Christ3s
righteousness to thesinner in ustification alone.122!n the other
side of the spectrum has been Herbert'ouglass who maintains that
3righteousness b) faith3 is wider than ustification andincludes
sanctification and in fact represents the possibilit) of saints
livingrighteousl) as Christ did b) faith in (od.123
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
17/202
relative to the sin problem.
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
18/202
with theological themes. He continued his editorial work in
$ngland and his articlesalso appeared regularl) in the Australian
counterpart to the igns of the Times.1*2There are man) in the
church toda) who believe that the contribution of $. 8.aggoner in
the field of Christolog) is vital for the church3s fresh
understanding of itsrole and for the forward thrust of the church
as it seeks to fulfill its mission. In thelight of these facts it
was thought important to look at the Christolog) of $.
8.aggoner.
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
19/202
+*$ Heppenstall= BThe #aw in Adventist Theolog) and Christian
$xperience=B'octrinal 'iscussions= ashington= '.C.E "eview and
Herald PublishingAssociation= G15*,= pp.11+,*. Gback
++Hans @ #a "ondelle has studied at 0trecht tate 0niversit) and
holds the Th.'.degree from the /ree 0niversit) of Amsterdam= where
his promoter was 'r ( C:erkouwer. #a "ondelle oined the facult) of
Andrews 0niversit)= The
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
20/202
-2)bid.= pp.149+19,. Gback
-3)bid.= pp.1-2+1-*. Gback
-)8ames hite= BChrist $7ual with (od=B "eview and Herald=
&ovember ,5= 19--=p.1-,. Gback
-*Se$enth-day Ad$entist %ncyclo'edia= $ditor ' / &eufeld=
ashington= '.C.E"eview and Herald Publishing Association= 15**=
pp.146*+1419. Gback
-+)bid.= pp.1,2;+1,24. :) 3spirit of prophec)3 the Adventist
understands that (odspoke to and through $llen hite b) the
inspiration of the Hol) pirit in a mannersimilar to prophets in
:iblical times without impl)ing that her writings form part of
thecriptural canon. Gback
-,/room= Mo$ement of Destiny= pp.12-+1-4. /room traces the
semi+Arian views of0riah mith from 19*21959. He particularl)
compares mith3s Thoughts on the"evelation as the author discusses
"ev. 1E4. He notes mith3s modification of viewin comparing the
first= second and third editions of 19*2= 19-2 and 1991. mith
diedin 156; and /room states that in the 1544 revision of mith3s
book this passage=
together with all others containing Arian concepts= were
permanentl) deleted. /roomalso maintains that 8 H aggoner held to
stricted view of Christ and denied thepersonalit) of the Hol)
pirit. )bid.Gback
--illiam Prescott D1922+1544F educator and editor. as president
of :attleCreek College D1992+1954F= then of 0nion College and alla
alla College."ecogni?ed as a :iblical scholar. tarted ministerial
training work at Avondalechool= Australia= then had charge of
Adventist work in $ngland= where heassociated with $ 8 aggoner. In
1561 was elected vice+president of the (eneralConference. as
chairman of "eview and Herald board= and editor of
"eviewD156;+1565F= then of Protestant
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
21/202
./"obert ' :rinsmead is an Australian of Adventist background
who attendedAvondale College for a period but never entered the
organi?ed church work. A self+made scholar and a writer of no mean
abilit)= he championed the Banctuar)AwakeningB movement in the
15263s and 15*63s and then made a theologicalsomersault in the
15-63s to champion the "eformed doctrine of 8ustification b)
/aithalone.
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
22/202
the substitutionar) atonement of the cross and the primac) of
8ustification b) /aith.Gback
111"aoul / 'ederen= of "oman Catholic background= became a
eventh+da)Adventist as a )oung man. ith a thorough $uropean
educational background hetrained for the Adventist ministr) and
worked as a minister and later as a trainer ofministers at the
eventh+da) Adventist College at Collognes= /rance. Aftercompleting
a doctoral degree in Historical Theolog) at the 0niversit) of
(eneva= he
was called to lecture at the eventh+da) Adventist Theological
eminar) at Andrews0niversit) in 15*4. 0pon the departure of
Heppenstall in 15**= 'ederen wasappointed as chairman of the
'epartment of Theolog) and Christian Philosoph)= apost he still
holds in 159, at the time of writing. 'ederen has consistentl)
taught acourse in Christolog) at the eminar) during these )ears and
has had an importantand moulding influence on the ministr) of the
eventh+da) Adventist Church. Gback
112ee " ' :rinsmead=A *e$ie6 of the A6akening Message! , parts=
Gn.p. =15-,+;> (eoffre) 8 Paxton= The haking of Adventism=
'elawareE Qenith Publishers=Inc.= 15--= pp.1,1+1,9. Gback
113ee Paxton= The Shaking of Ad$entism!pp.1,2+142. Gback
11)H $ 'ouglass= Bh) (od is 0rgent and et aits= *e$ie6 and
"erald!specialissue= B"ighteousness b) /aithB D 8esus= the
otherwise He could not have partaken of our nature= but would
havehad an infinite and wholl) extra+human advantage which would
have rendered faithunnecessar)B Dp.19-F. &otice the statement
on perfectionE BThe primar) end andpurpose of the Advent and
finall) in 15-9 itassumed its current name=Ad$entist *e$ie6.Perhaps
the name most widel) usedto identif) the maga?ine in the 0nited
tates is *e$ie6 and "erald. Gback
11-There is controvers) as to whether /room represents
enlightened= progressiveAdventism built on the best in the past or
whether he represents a subtle departurefrom the faith. Gback
11./room= Mo$ement of Destiny= pp.45;+21-. Gback
12/)bid.= pp.;2-+;-4. Gback
121A :ible Institute was held at
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
23/202
3righteousness b) faith3 controvers). A statement was issued
after the Conference.Gback
12*& C ilson= BAn !pen #etter to the Church=BAd$entist
*e$ie6!B Gback
1)3$ ( hite= The #reat Contro$ersy et6een Christ and Satan=
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
24/202
1)+)bid.= p.1;92. Gback
1),:ecame assistant editor of the Signs of the Timesin 1994 and
editor in199*=which post he held until thirdl)= we will give an
anal)sis of her Christolog)> and= lastl)= we will seekto give an
evaluation and criti7ue of this aspect of her theological
contribution.
1 A H!"t#r!$a% S=et$h # E%%en G Wh!te1
$llen (ould Harmon was born on &ovember ,*= 19,-= near
(orham=
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
25/202
/rom 192,+22 the) lived in "ochester= &ew ork= bus) printing
church periodicalssuch as the *e$ie6 and "eraldand the outh>s
)nstructor. In &ovember 1922 thehites moved to new head7uarters
in :attle Creek= A Criti,ue ofthe ook Pro'hetess of "ealth=
prepared b) the staff of the $llen (. hite $state=ashington= '.C.=
15-*> Arthur (rosvenor 'aniells= The Abiding #ift of Pro'hecy=
'. A.
'elafield= %llen #. (hite in %uro'e= ashington= '.C.E "eview and
HeraldPublishing Association= 15-2> T Houses 8amison=A Pro'het
Among ou= 8 & #oughborough=The #reat Second Ad$ent
Mo$ement!ashington= '.C.E "eview and HeraldPublishing Association=
1562= 1565> /rancis ' &ichol= %llen # (hite and "er
Critics=ashington= '.C.E "eview and Herald Publishing Association=
1521> "onald #&umbers= Pro'hetess of "ealth0 A Study of
%llen # (hite!&ew orkE Harper and"ow= 15-*> Se$enth-day
Ad$entist %ncyclo'edia= Commentar) "eference eries=%ol. 16=
ashington= '.C.E "eview and Herald= 15**= pp.146*+1419> Horace
8haw= BA "hetorical Anal)sis of the peaking of Arthur #. hite=
%llen # (hite0 Messenger to the *emnant=ashington= '.C.E "eview and
Herald Publishing Association= 15*5> Arthur #. hite=The %llen #.
(hite (ritings= ashington= '.C.E "eview and Herald
PublishingAssociation= 15-;> 8ames hite= Life Sketches!
Ancestry! %arly Life! Christian%&'erience and %&tensi$e
Labors! of %lder ames (hite! and "is (ife! Mrs. %llen #(hite=
:attle Creek= /rancis
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
26/202
hite and eventh+da) Adventism=B Ph.'. dissertation= Clark
0niversit)= 15;;.Gback
2illiam cf. Se$enth-day Ad$entist ible Students> Source
ookCommentar) "eferenceeries= %olume 5= ashington= '.C.E "eview and
Herald Publishing Association=15*,= pp.*2-+ **,> /rancis '
&ichol! The Midnight Cry= Takoma Park= ashington='.C.E "eview
and Herald Publishing Association= 1544. Gback
3In
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
27/202
and inspirational nuggets.
$llen hite3s range of theological interest covered aspects of
the plan of salvationfrom the inception of sin in heaven to the
final restoration of all things. This theme ofwhat she called 3the
great controvers) between Christ and atan3 became theburden of much
of her writing. These thoughts first found expression in four
volumesentitled S'iritual #iftsappearing from 1929+19*4. The
messages in these volumeswere refined and amplified in another four
volumes appearing under the title= The
S'irit of Pro'hecyduring the )ears 19-6+1994. /urther
development took place andthese books were replaced with the five
volumes of the Conflict of the Ages series=namel)= Patriarchs and
Pro'hetsD1956F> Pro'hets and +ingsD151-F> Desire of
AgesD1959F>Acts of the A'ostlesD1511F and The #reat
Contro$ersy:etween Christ andatan D1999F. The nature of these
writings is not exegetical but could be describedas an expositor)=
homiletical and descriptive surve) of the criptures set in
adevotional and spiritual framework.
If one compares the st)le of the writing of $llen hite in her
earlier works such as%arly (ritingsand S'iritual #iftswith such
books as The Desire of AgesD1959F= TheMinistry of "ealingD1562F
orActs of the A'ostlesD1511F= one discovers adevelopment and growth
in her st)le of language and expression.
:uilding her own librar)=11
she devoted time to the reading of books of a devotionaland
theological nature on :iblical and historical themes. All of this
contributed to thedevelopment of her own writing st)le.
ith the tremendous amount of writing= $llen hite felt it
necessar) to emplo)literar) assistants to aid in the checking=
correcting= cop)ing and compiling of thematerial. The actual role
of these literar) assistants has been the subect
ofcontrovers).12The secretaries would often have to gather existing
written materialb) $llen hite from periodical articles or
manuscripts to form the basis of some newbook.13It is now also
clear that in the preparation of her articles and books materialb)
other authors found in various sources was carefull) selected for
incorporation inher writings. This 7uestion of $llen hite3s use of
other sources has also elicitedmuch discussion and is at present
receiving scholarl) investigation b) the leadership
of the eventh+da) Adventist Church.1)
In the volume of material covering periodical articles=
manuscripts= pamphlets= lettersand books it is understandable that
there is a certain amount of repetition ofmaterial. This must be
borne in mind in making an) investigation of the subect. It
isimportant to find the context of a particular statement to see
how the author intendedit to be understood. This is= of course=
particularl) vital when material in compilationsput together after
the death of $llen hite is studied. The compiler might take
aparagraph and use it to emphasi?e a certain point when the
original context of theparagraph might throw a different light on
the material.
$llen hite is also not a s)stematic theologian and her views on
Christolog) mustbe gleaned from her whole corpus of writings. Her
magnum opus on Christolog)=The Desire of Ages= is= likewise= not a
s)stematic theolog)= but a descriptive anddevotional stud) on the
life of Christ.
KKKKK
."eference has alread) been made to the fact that as a result of
the accident which
$llen hite had at the age of nine her formal education was
hampered. Afterintermittent efforts= she made a brief last attempt
at school at about the age of 1,=and again suffered failing health.
Her later education came from reading and fromcontacts with others.
he must have been strongl) motivated to have spent so muchof her
life in writing. Gback
1/In harmon) with the provisions of $llen hite3s will calling
for the publication ofbooks compiled from her manuscripts= and her
instruction that various of her articleswhich had appeared in the
ournals of the church should be reprinted= the :oard ofTrustees of
the hite $state + which her will created to care for her writings
haveissued man) posthumous works. A few selected titles are givenE
Counsels on "ealthD15,;F> Messages to oung Peo'leD15;6F>
%$angelismD154*F> The Ad$entist "omeD152,F> Selected
Messages= :ooks 1 N , D1529F. /or a complete list up to 15*1
see
Comprehensive Index to the ritings of $llen (. hite=
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
28/202
13&ote the articles in The *e$ie6 and "eraldfrom 8ul) ;=
151; to /ebruar) ,*=1514 which formed the substance of Pro'hets and
+ingspp.9-+;66 which waspublished in 151*. Gback
1)This 7uestion of $llen hite3s use of sources will come up for
more detaileddiscussion in the evaluation. Gback
III E%%en Wh!te" Chr!"t#%#'(
The material forming the substance of $llen hite3s Christolog)
lies scatteredthroughout her writings. It is our task to discover
the dominant themes andtendencies in her thought. Is there an)
progression in her Christological views fromthe earliest times to
her mature )ears Is there general harmon) in her ideas or isthere
contradiction in the mass of material 'oes she approach Christolog)
3fromabove3 or 3from below3 ould she find herself comfortable in
the ontological= thefunctional or some other classification of
Christolog)
:ecause the main focus of this dissertation is on the
Incarnation it was felt best toconcentrate on this area of
Christolog) in our description of $llen hite3s position.This in
itself is a broad field and offers much scope for the student of
$llen hite.
After careful research and anal)sis it was decided to present
three sections on theIncarnation= namel)= Incarnation and
&ature= Incarnation and in and Incarnationand (race. The first
will deal with the Person of Christ= the second with
therelationship between Christ and sin and the third with the work
of Christ. To giveperspective we will present $llen hite3s views of
the pre+existence of Christ beforewe tackle the Incarnation and
then will close with a picture of Christ in the future. #etus
commence with her views regarding Christ3s preexistence.
A The Pre6e5!"ten$e # Chr!"t
$llen hite alwa)s professed the pre+existence of Christ and in
her later writingscame out clearl) in support of the eternit) of
Christ and His e7ualit) with the /ather
in nature and essence. &ote her declaration in 195,1*on the
essential e7ualit) ofChrist with the /ather in His pre+existent
stateE BThe onl) wa) in which the fallen racecould be restored was
through the gift of His on= e7ual with Himself='ossessingthe
attributesof (od.B1+To actuall) possess the attributes of (od would
place Christon an essential e7ualit) with the /ather. In 195- $llen
hite said of ChristE BHe isthe eternalself+existent on.B1,Here she
is clear that Christ had no beginning but iseternal. In her book=
The Desire of Ages= written in 1959= she states on His
eternit)EB/rom the da)s of eternit) the #ord 8esus Christ was one
with the /ather> He was3the image of (od3= the image of His
greatness and maest)= 3the outshining of Hisglor).B1-In a ver)
important article in the *e$ie6 and "eraldin 156* these
concepts regarding the pre+existence= the eternit) and the
e7ualit) of Christ with the/ather were pennedE
B:ut while (od3s ord speaks of the humanit) of Christ when upon
this earth= it alsospeaks decidedl) regarding His pre+existence.
The ord existed as a divine being=even as the eternal on of (od= in
union and oneness with His /ather. /romeverlasting He was the
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
29/202
In the remainder of the passage in S'iritual #iftsthe suggestion
is made that the/ather gave authorit) to His on= exalted Him and
endowed Him with unlimitedpower and command. This is= of course= in
connection with the coming creation ofman but it does sound as if
the position of Christ was in doubt and as if (od the/ather
bestowed the authorit) on Christ which was not His inherentl). It
sounds inthis passage as if the on is subordinate to the
/ather.
e move on to the comparative section as it appeared in The
S'irit of Pro'hecy=%ol. 1= of 19-6E
Batan in Heaven= before his rebellion= was a high and exalted
angel= next in honorto (od3s dear on...He GChrist was one with the
/ather before the angels werecreated. atan was envious of Christ=
and graduall) assumed command whichdevolved on Christ alone. The
great Creator assembled the heavenl) host= that hemight in the
presence of all the angels confer special honor upon His
on...The/ather then made known that it was ordained b) himself that
Christ= his on= shouldbe e7ual with himself> so that wherever
was the presence of his on= it was as hisown presence. The word of
the on was to be obe)ed as readil) as the word of the/ather. His on
he had invested with authorit) to command the heavenl)host...atan
was envious and ealous of 8esus Christ...:ut Christ was
acknowledged
sovereign of Heaven= his power and authorit) to be the same as
that of (odhimself...The) Gatan and his s)mpathi?ers were
discontented and unhapp)because the) could not look into his G(od3s
unsearchable wisdom and ascertain hispurposes in exalting his on
8esus= and endowing him with such unlimited powerand command. The)
rebelled against the authorit) of the on...The) Glo)al
angelsustified the act of (od in conferring honor upon 8esus
Christ....The) clearl) set forththat 8esus was the on of (od=
existing with him before the angels were created>and that he had
ever stood at the right hand of (od=...22
The above is similar in sentiment but more expansive than the
1929 presentation.!nce again there is the ealous) on the part of
atan over the exaltation andendowment of 8esus Christ and the
conferring of honor upon Him. There is theadditional thought in the
19-6 material on the oneness of Christ with the /ather and
their e7ualit). &ote= BHe GChrist was one with the /ather
before the angels werecreated...it was ordained b) himself that
Christ= his on= should be e7ual withhimself.B23The unit) of the
/ather and the on is stated= a unit) which reaches backbefore the
creation of the angels. Christ is declared to be the on of (od
existingbefore the angelic creation and that he had ever stood at
the right hand of (od.However= it is not clear whether this unit)
is an eternal one or whether the e7ualit) ofChrist with the /ather
is a delegated e7ualit) or an inherent one of nature. It mustalso
be said that the passage of 19-6 sounds clearer than the one of
1929=indicating that the unit) of the on and the /ather had been of
long standing and thespecial exaltation and endowment of Christ was
a special act in view of the
participation of Christ in the creation of man.
e now finall) look at Patriarchs and Pro'hets= written in 1956=
and compare thesection covering the same ground as in the previous
two worksE
BChrist= the ord= the onl) begotten of (od= was one with the
eternal /ather + one innature= in character= in purpose + the onl)
being that could enter into all the counselsand purposes of (od.
3His name shall be called onderful= Counselor= The might)
(od= the everlasting /ather= The Prince of peace3...The /ather
wrought b) his on inthe creation of all heavenl) beings...in
originated with him= who= next to Christ= hadbeen most honored of
(od= and was highest in power and glor) among theinhabitants of
heaven...And coveting the glor) with which the infinite /ather
hadinvested his on= this prince of angels aspired to power that was
the prerogative ofChrist alone ...#ucifer allowed his ealous) of
Christ to prevail= and became the moredetermined...The @ing of the
universe summoned the heavenl) hosts before him=that in their
presence he might set forth the true position of his on= and show
therelation he sustained to all created beings. The on of (od
shared the /ather3sthrone= and the glor) of the eternal=
self+existent !ne encircled both...The exaltationof the on of (od
as e7ual with the /ather was represented as an inustice
to#ucifer...There had been no change in the position or authorit)
of Christ. #ucifer3senv) and misrepresentation= and his claims to
e7ualit) with Christ= had made
necessar) a statement of the true position of the on of (od>
but this had been thesame from the beginningB. 2)
Here there is still further progression of thought in stating
that Christ3s e7ualit) withthe /ather is one of natureas well as
character and purpose. The glor) of theeternal= self+existent !ne
encircles both the /ather and the on. Here it is clearl)indicated
that Christ3s e7ualit) with the /ather had ever been such= but that
atan3sealous) over Christ concerning his participation in the
creation of man had made adeclaration of the position
necessar).
This writer submits that in comparing these three works over the
period 1929 to1956 there is a progressive clarit) in enunciating
the Christolog) of $llen hite withrelation to the nature and person
of the pre+existent Christ. e would suggest that
what we are dealing with here is not contradiction. The earlier
work did contain thegerminal thought which was expanded and refined
through the )ears. hile neverclearl) adopting an Arian position=
$llen hite was surrounded with some Adventistleaders who thought in
this line and she= no doubt= worked in the theological milieuof her
time. It is 7uite remarkable that while a form of semi+Arianism was
evident inAdventism up to the end of the 15th centur) that $llen
hite was able to avoid thepitfall.2*&o doubt her own thinking
and understanding of the subect also grew andhence her language and
expression became clearer.2+
It is important to note that well before the appearance of
Patriarchs and Pro'hetsin
29
http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#22%2322http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#23%2323http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#24%2324http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#25%2325http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#25%2325http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#26%2326http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#22%2322http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#23%2323http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#24%2324http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#25%2325http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#26%2326
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
30/202
1956=$llen hite was alread) using terms such as 3eternal3 and
3everlasting3 inrelation to Christ. In 19-9 she contrasts the
unworthiness= weakness and inefficienc)of man with 3the eternal on
of (od3.2,In 1991 when she described the price Christpaid on
Calvar)= she sa)sE BHis throne is from everlasting= and his kingdom
shallhave no end.B2-It is helpful to remember $llen hite3s
ascription of Christ as eternaland e$erlastingin 19-9 and 1991 in
giving consideration to the previousl) fromPatriarchs and
Pro'hetsit simpl) states the position of Christ same from
thebeginning.2.
It is also of interest to note that $llen hite said in 19-4 that
the sentence of deathwould be borne b) a substitute of greater
value than the law of (odE 3:ut a plan wasdevised that the sentence
of death should rest upon a substitute of superior value tothe law
of (od.33/To man) Christians this statement might appear banal but
it shouldbe remembered that for eventh+da) Adventist who place such
emphasis on themoral law of (od as the standard of righteousness
and as a transcript of thecharacter of (od= the statement is
significant for the person of Christ.
After 1956 $llen hite3s thoughts on the eternit) and the
e7ualit) of the on with the/ather in Christ3s pre+existent state
are clearl) and forcefull) enunciated. Could it bethat the and The
#reatContro$ersy= p.45;E BChrist...was one with the eternal /ather=
+ one in nature= incharacter= and in purpose.B The reader will
notice that certain words of $llen hiteare underlined for emphasis.
This is m) own emphasis and will be occurring
throughout this chapter. If at an) point the emphasis is $llen
hite3s own this will bestated. Gback
1,$. (. hite=
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
31/202
the issue b) )ear= month and da). As $llen hite usuall) onl) had
one article ineach issue it is eas) to locate the statement or
thought. In the bibliograph) the fulltitle of articles and the page
numbers in the relevant periodical will be given. G back
2-$. (. hite= *e$ie6 and "erald= August ,= 1991. ee also )bid.=
!ctober ,-=1992E B8esus laid aside his robes of ro)alt)= stepped
down from his eternal throne...Bee similar thought in )bid.=
'ecember 1= 1992. Gback
2.A significant title which $llen hite applies to Christ in His
pre+existence as wellas during His Incarnation is 3195, Ste's to
Christ> 195* Thoughts from the Mount of lessing> 1959 The
Desireof Ages> 1566 Christ>s ObBect Lessons> 1566+1565
Testimonies= %ols. *=-=9=5> 156;%ducation> 1562 The Ministry
of "ealing> 1511 The Acts of the A'ostles> 151;Counsels to
Parents= Teachers and Students> 1512 #os'el (orkersDnew
editionF>151- Pro'hets and +ings. Gback
0 The In$arnat!#n an7 Natre
#et us now address ourselves to $llen hite3s teaching regarding
the Incarnationand the nature of Christ. e will firstl) present her
views on the :iblical concept of
the kenosis> secondl)= her teaching in connection with the
two natures of Christ>thirdl)= we will give attention to her
understanding of the m)ster) of the Incarnation>fourthl)= we
will show her concepts on the divinit) of Christ> and lastl)= we
will noteher emphasis on the humanit) of Christ.
1 The Ken#"!"
hile $llen hite did not advocate the modern theories of the
kenosis=32she didadvocate some form of kenosis in harmon) with the
teaching of Philippians ,E*+9.hen the pre+existent Christ adopted
humanit) and became man what did He
surrender and give up 'oes $llen hite believe that He laid aside
some of theattributes of deit) or all of them or none of them 'oes
she teach that Christ was still(od while on earth or does she teach
that He ceased to be (od in the Incarnation
$llen hite in man) places states what Christ sacrificed and laid
aside in becominga man. he states that He sacrificed His maest)=
His splendor= His glor) and Hishonor in adopting humanit).33The
glor) which He left is explained as the Bglor) ofthe heavenl)
kingdom=B3)the Bglor) of the /atherB3*and Bthe glor) which He had
withHis /ather before the world was.B3+/urthermore= she sa)sE BHe
left the glor) ofcreation and the glor) of instituting and
administering the law with the /ather.B3,$lsewhere she states that
Christ Bleft His throne of glor)B= or exchanged Bthe throneof light
and glor) which He had with the /ather for humanit)=B3-and Bstepped
downfrom the glorious throne in heaven.B3.He Blaid aside His ro)al
robes and His kingl)crownB)/and left BHis ro)al throneB)1and Bthe
ro)al courts.B)2Christ also Bleft Hisriches and His high
commandB)3and BHis heavenl) homeB))and Blaid off His
gloriousdiadem.B)*
There are= therefore= man) things which $llen hite sa)s Christ
laid aside inbecoming man. However= she does not state that Christ
laid aside His essential deit)or divinit) or the attributes of (od
in adopting human nature. Instead of sa)ing thatChrist laid aside
His divinit)= she states repeatedl) that Christ Bclothed His
divinit)
with humanit)B or He Bveiled His divinit) with humanit).B These
phrases or similarones are used approximatel) 1,2 times in her
*e$ie6 and "eraldarticles alone inthe period from 19-,+1514.)+These
phrases are so important and representative of$llen hite3s thought
that we wish to 7uote one clear example of eachE
B/or our sake He stepped down from His ro)al throne= and clothed
"is di$inity 6ithhumanity. He laid aside His ro)al robe= His kingl)
crown= that He might he one withus.B),
e give an example of the other phrase usedE BThe but He
hadclothed His divinit) in humanit).B*1$llen hite does not propound
a modern kenotictheor) which emaciates the divinit) of Christ.
&otice her wordsE BHe veiled Hisdivinit) with the garb of
humanit)= but "e did notpart with His divinit). B*2According
31
http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#27!%2327!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#28!%2328!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#28!%2328!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#29!%2329!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#30!%2330!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#31!%2331!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#32%2332http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#33%2333http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#33%2333http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#34%2334http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#35%2335http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#36%2336http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#37%2337http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#38%2338http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#39%2339http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#40%2340http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#40%2340http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#41%2341http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#41%2341http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#42%2342http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#43%2343http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#43%2343http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#44%2344http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#45%2345http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#46%2346http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#47%2347http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#48%2348http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#49%2349http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#50%2350http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#51%2351http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#52%2352http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#27!%2327!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#28!%2328!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#29!%2329!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#30!%2330!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIa.htm#31!%2331!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#32%2332http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#33%2333http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#34%2334http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#35%2335http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#36%2336http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#37%2337http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#38%2338http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#39%2339http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#40%2340http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#41%2341http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#42%2342http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#43%2343http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#44%2344http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#45%2345http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#46%2346http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#47%2347http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#48%2348http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#49%2349http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#50%2350http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#51%2351http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#52%2352
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
32/202
to her= Christ did not lose His divinit) when He became man. He
was not simpl) agood man who had been (od before. he sa)sE BThough
He took humanit) uponHimself= He was divine. All that is attributed
to the /ather Himself is attributed toChrist.B*3$llen hite has a
ver) high view of the deit) of the and in "im #od "imself camedo6n
from hea$en= and clothed Himself in the habitiments of humanit).
B*)Indescribing the visit of 8esus Christ to the temple in
8erusalem she sa)sE BThe secondtemple was honored= not with the
cloud of 8ehovah3s glor)= but with the livingpresence of !ne in
whom dwelt all the fullness of the (odhead bodil)= + (od
Himselfmanifest in the flesh.B**
2 The T9# Natre"
$llen hite maintains that the divine and human natures were
combined to form oneperson. he writesE Bas the human nature of the
on of the two natures were m)steriousl) blended inone person +
the
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
33/202
B:eneath the lowl) guise of 8esus= the) recogni?ed the presence
of 'ivinit). The)gave their hearts to Him as their aviour= and then
poured out their gifts + gold= andfrankincense= and
m)rrh.B,)peaking of the priest who performed the dedication of8esus
in the temple= $llen hite affirms that he did not sense that the
!ne l)ing inhis arms was the @ing of glor).,*
$ven in the da)s of His childhood BHe was the divine on of (od=
and )et a helplesschild.B,+
In the earthl) life of Christ the manifestation of His glor) was
subdued and Hismaest) veiled that the weak vision of finite men
might behold it. BIn the e)es of theworld He possessed no beaut)
that the) should desire Him> )et He was theincarnate (od= the
light of heaven and earth.B,,Christ did not surrender His
essentialdeit) in becoming a man. In accomplishing the redemption
of man= $llen hitecommentsE BThis was not done b) going out of
Himself to another= but b) takinghumanit) into Himself.,-In 199-
she wrote regarding Christ3s Person as being divineEBHe was (od
while upon earth= but He divested Himself of the form of (od= and
in itsstead took the form and fashion of a man...He laid aside His
glor) and His maest).He was (od= but the glories of the form of (od
He for a while relin7uished.B,.
In conversation with the Pharisees and rulers 8esus Christ made
a startling
declaration regarding Himself in relation to Abraham when He
said= B%eril)= veril)= Isa) unto )ou= before Abraham was= I A
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
34/202
was not used to unfair advantage of His humanit). And )et there
are the man)indications of the divinit) of His Person in His
abilit) to read thoughts and hearts andthe future. He forgave sin
in the capacit) of His being the eternal on of (od. Hismiracles
were an evidence of His His bod) was strong and
health)...Ph)sicall) as well as spirituall)= Hewas an example of
what (od designed all humanit) to be through obedience to
Hislaws.B112BChrist is a perfect representation of (od on the one
hand= and a perfect
specimen of sinless humanit) on the other hand.B
113
In this section on Incarnation and nature we have sought to
describe $llen hite3sviews on various aspects of this subect. e
have presented her ideas on thekenosis= the two natures of Christ=
the m)ster) of the Incarnation= the divinit) ofChrist and His
humanit). In a later section on anal)sis we will take a closer=
criticallook at the problem of the relationship between the
divinit) and humanit) of Christ in$llen hite3s presentation. /or
the present we turn our attention to her position onIncarnation and
sin.
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
32The reader is referred to footnote 16 in chapter one.
Gback
33$. (. hite= *e$ie6 and "erald=
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
35/202
3, )bid.= 8anuar) 4= 1991. Gback
3-ee $. (. hite= *e$ie6 and "erald= 'ecember 5= 1994>
eptember 11= 1999.Gback
3.$. (. hite= *e$ie6 and "erald= 'ecember 11= 1999. Gback
)/)bid.= 'ecember 1= 1992> 8une 11= 1995> /ebruar) 19=
1956> 8une 16= 1956>/ebruar) 2= 1952> 8ul) 5= 1952>
eptember ,,= 195*> 8ul) 19= 1955> !ctober 1-=1955>
&ovember ,1= 1955> eptember ;= 156;> /ebruar) 12= 151,.
Gback
+/$. (. hite= BThe #ife of Christ=B *e$ie6 and "erald= 'ecember
;1= 19-,. Gback
+1$. (. hite= BThe "elation of Christ to the #aw is not
0nderstood=B *e$ie6 and
"erald= /ebruar) 4= 1956. Gback
+2$. (. hite= BChrist our Hope=B *e$ie6 and "erald= 'ecember ,6=
195,. Gback
+3$. (. hite= The Desire of Ages= p.;,*. Gback
+)$. (. hite= The Desire of Ages= p.26-. ee also *e$ie6 and
"erald= April ,;=1952. Gback
+*$. (. hite= BThe Treasure of Truth "eected=B *e$ie6 and
"erald. April ;= 1954.Gback
35
http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#37!%2337!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#37!%2337!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#38!%2338!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#38!%2338!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#39!%2339!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#39!%2339!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#40!%2340!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#40!%2340!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#41!%2341!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#41!%2341!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#42!%2342!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#42!%2342!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#43!%2343!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#43!%2343!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#44!%2344!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#44!%2344!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#45!%2345!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#45!%2345!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#46!%2346!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#47!%2347!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#47!%2347!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#48!%2348!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#48!%2348!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#49!%2349!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#49!%2349!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#50!%2350!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#50!%2350!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#51!%2351!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#52!%2352!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#53!%2353!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#53!%2353!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#54!%2354!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#54!%2354!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#55!%2355!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#55!%2355!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#56!%2356!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#57!%2357!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#58!%2358!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#59!%2359!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#59!%2359!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#60!%2360!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#60!%2360!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#61!%2361!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#61!%2361!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#62!%2362!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#62!%2362!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#63!%2363!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#64!%2364!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#64!%2364!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#65!%2365!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#65!%2365!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#37!%2337!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#38!%2338!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#39!%2339!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#40!%2340!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#41!%2341!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#42!%2342!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#43!%2343!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#44!%2344!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#45!%2345!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#46!%2346!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#47!%2347!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#48!%2348!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#49!%2349!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#50!%2350!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#51!%2351!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#52!%2352!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#53!%2353!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#54!%2354!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#55!%2355!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#56!%2356!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#57!%2357!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#58!%2358!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#59!%2359!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#60!%2360!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#61!%2361!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#62!%2362!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#63!%2363!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#64!%2364!http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIb.htm#65!%2365!
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
36/202
++$. (. hite= B!ur ords + &o. ,=B *e$ie6 and "erald= 8anuar)
,2= 1959. Gback
+,$. (. hite= BCorrect %iews Concerning the Testimonies=B *e$ie6
and "erald=August ;6= 156*. Gback
+-$. (. hite= BCornelius= a eeker for Truth=B *e$ie6 and "erald=
April *= 1511.ee also *e$ie6 and "erald= 8anuar) 1;= 156;> 8ul)
1*= 1514. Gback
+.$. (. hite=
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
37/202
-+ )bid.= p.1;5. Gback
-,$. (. hite= The Desire of Ages= p.1*,. Gback
-- )bid.= p.1*9. It is interesting to note that $llen hite
ascribes infinite wisdom toChrist. Gback
-. )bid.= pp.19-=195. Gback
./ )bid.= p.15-. Gback
.1!bserve her wordsE BHe knew that he was in the presence of !ne
who could readthe thoughts= and to whom all things were possibleB
DThe Desire of Ages= p.159F.Gback
.2 )bid.= p.,;9. B:ut 8esus gave them an evidence of His
divinit) b) revealing theirsecret thoughts.B Gback
.3!bserveE BThe aviour read the heart of 8udas> He knew the
depths of ini7uit) towhich= unless delivered b) the grace of (od=
8udas would sinkB DThe Desire of Ages=p.,54F. ee also )bid.= p.*2;.
At the last supper= Bb) reading the secret purpose of
the traitor3s heart= Christ gave to 8udas the final= convincing
evidence of His divinit)BD)bid.= p.*22F. It is interesting to note
that $llen hite considers this abilit) asevidence of Christ3s
divinit) rather than the guidance of the Hol) pirit as someprophet
might experience. Gback
.)he writesE BHis prophetic glance takes in the experience of
His servants throughall the ages till He shall come the second
timeB DThe Desire of Ages= p.;2,F. Gback
.*8esus gave the rabbis an evidence of His divinit) b) showing
that He read theirheartsB DThe Desire of Ages= p.42*F. ee also
)bid.= p.*6,. Gback
.+In connection with the accusers of the woman caught in
adulter)= $llen hitewrites of 8esusE BHe read the heart= and knew
the character and life+histor) of ever)
one in His presenceB D)bid.= p.4*6F. This is certainl) a view of
Christ which placesHim in a different categor) from other men.
Gback
.,&ote her wordsE Bhile he Gimon thought himself reading his
(uest= his (uesthad been reading himB D)bid.= p.2*-F. Gback
.-$llen hite links this phenomenon with certain important
experiences in Christ3slife. The first is on Christ3s visit to
8erusalem at the age of 1,. he writes concerning8esus and His
parentsE B!n His face was a light at which the) wondered.
'ivinit)was flashing through humanit)B DThe Desire of Ages= p.91F.
Again in the wildernesstemptation Bdivinit) flashed through
suffering humanit)B D)bid.= p.1;6F. Then at the
cleansing of the templeE B#ooking upon Christ= the) behold
divinit) f lash through thegarb of humanit). The
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
38/202
1/-$. (. hite= B&otes on Travel=B *e$ie6 and "erald=
/ebruar) 16= 1992.Amplif)ing this thought $llen hite sa)s that
because of His genuine humanit)Christ was brought to the Blevel of
man3s feeble facultiesB D*e$ie6 and "erald='ecember 11= 1999F>
Bsought strength from His /ather B D*e$ie6 and "erald= found pra)er
Ba necessit) and a privilegeB D*e$ie6 and "erald= 'ecember9= 1564F.
Gback
1/.$llen hite sa)s in this connection that BChrist knew the
griefs of human natureBD*e$ie6 and "erald= that BHe fought the
battle in painfulness5@*e$ie6 and "erald= April 15= 199-F> that
He accepted humanit) with its attendantills D*e$ie6 and
"erald!ctober ;= 151,F> and that He suffered as a man D*e$ie6and
"erald= &ovember 19= 1956F. Gback
11/$. (. hite= The Desire of Ages= p.49. ee also #etter 5-=
1959= in 8uestionson Doctrine= p.***. Gback
111$. (. hite= #etter ;2= 1954= in 8uestions on Doctrine= p.*51.
Gback
112$. (. hite= The Desire of Ages= p.26. Gback
113$. (. hite=
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
39/202
2 The State # S!n
All will agree that $llen hite clearl) taught that Christ
committed no actual sin inHis human life. hen it comes to the state
of sin the issues are more complex. 'id$llen hite teach that Christ
took the human nature of man before or after the fall'id Christ in
His human nature start where all other children start 'oes $llen
hitemaintain that the human race was affected b) original sin or
not If the race hasbeen= was Christ also affected in this wa) or
was He exempted 'id Christ have thesame human nature that the
converted man has= and if so= can all Christians live theunsullied
life which Christ lived To these issues in $llen hite we will now
addressourselves.
a. Christ Took Fallen Human Nature
$llen hite states man) times that Christ took our nature upon
Himself. BHe left Hisriches= His maest)= and His high command= and
took upon Himself our nature.B12-Here she is clearl) speaking about
human nature. BHe laid off His kingl) crown andro)al robe= and for
our salvation assumed human nature.B12.However= $llen hitegoes
further than this. In describing the humanit) which Christ took she
sa)s thatBHe accepted humanit) when the race had been weakened b)
four thousand )earsof sin.B13/
$llen hite in numerous passages states that Christ took upon
Himself our fallennature. In 19-4 she wroteE BThe @ing of glor)
proposed to humble Himself to fallenhumanit)U He would place His
feet in Adam3s steps. He would take man3s fallennature and engage
to cope with the strong foe who triumphed over Adam.B131In thethird
volume of S'irit of Pro'hecywhich appeared in 19-9 she said of
Christ inrelation to man that He B assumed their fallen
nature.B132In 195* she was stillconsistentl) speaking in this vein
when she wroteE
BChrist the spotless on of (od= honored humanit) b) taking upon
Himself fallen
human nature.B
133
In the same )ear she spoke of Christ connecting our fallen
humannature with His divinit)E
BThough He had no taint of sin upon His character= )et He
condescended to connectour fallen human nature with His divinit).
:) thus taking humanit)= He honoredhumanit). Having taken our
fallen nature= He showed what it might become= b)accepting the
ample provision He has made for it= and b) becoming partaker of
thedivine nature.B13)
In her classic= The Desire of Ages= which appeared in 1959= she
wroteE B&otwithstanding that the sins of a guilt) world were
laid upon Christ= notwithstandingthe humiliation of taking upon
Himself our fallen nature= the voice from heavendeclared Him to be
the on of the $ternal.B13*&ot onl) does $llen hite speak
ofChrist taking our fallen nature upon Himself= but she also speaks
of taking uponHimself man3s sinful nature. he wroteE BClad in the
vestments of humanit)= the onof (od came down to the level of those
He wished to save. In Him was no guile orsinfulness> He was ever
pure and undefiled> )et He took upon Him our
sinfulnature.B13+$llen hite furthers her thought b) stating that
human nature Bdegradedand defiled b) sinB >13,came in Bthe
likeness of sinful fleshB>13-upon Himself Btheoffending nature
of manB>13.its deteriorated condition.1)/It is interesting in
nature into note that $llen hite does not sa) that Christ possessed
a sinful nature= but thatHe Btook upon Him our sinful nature.B
Thus far we have seen that $llen hite taught that Christ took
upon Himselfhumanit)= fallen humanit)= our sinful nature= the
infirmities of degenerate humanit)and our nature in its
deteriorated condition. :efore addressing ourselves to
thisparticular problem we will view the other side of the subect b)
observing her strongpronouncements on the sinlessness of Christ in
the extreme.
b. Christ's State of Sinlessness
There are strong indications that for $llen hite sin was foreign
to Christ not onl) inword= thought or deed= but to the ver) depths
of His soul. he sa)s repeatedl) thatChrist was free from the ver)
taint of sin. BAnd thus He who knew not the taint of sin=pours out
His life as a malefactor upon Calvar)...&ot onl) did Christ die
as oursacrifice= but He lived as our example. In His human nature
He stands complete=perfect= spotless.B1)1Christ was Bfree from the
taint of sinB>1)2He was Bfree fromever) taint of
selfishness.B1)3he is emphatic that Christ throughout His life was
freefrom the taint of sin.1))
!ther terms which $llen hite emplo)s to indicate Christ3s state
of sinlessness arethe absence of corruption= pollution and
defilement. he writes of Christ that BHe
was unsullied with corruption= a stranger to sin.B1)*
imilar language is used whenshe sa)sE B8esus was incorruptible
and undefiled...B1)+Throughout His life Christ wasuntainted with
corruption.1),$llen hite sa)s clearl) that Christ was Bborn without
ataint of sin= but came into the world in like manner as the human
famil).B1)-This is apowerful dialectical statement showing the
thinking of $llen hite on the birth ofChrist. Here she is not
speaking of deeds and actions but of state. /or $llen hiteChrist
had no original sin.
Contrasting the lepros) of sin with the pure life of Christ she
wroteE B:ut 8esus=coming to dwell in humanit)= receives no
pollution.B1).If Christ entered the worldwithout corruption= or
taint of sin or pollution= does $llen hite teach that all other
39
http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#128%23128http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#128%23128http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#129%23129http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#130%23130http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#131%23131http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#132%23132http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#132%23132http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#133%23133http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#134%23134http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#135%23135http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#136%23136http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#137%23137http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#137%23137http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#137%23137http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#138%23138http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#138%23138http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#138%23138http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#139%23139http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#139%23139http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#139%23139http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#140%23140http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#140%23140http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#141%23141http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#141%23141http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#142%23142http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#142%23142http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#142%23142http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#143%23143http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#143%23143http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#144%23144http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#144%23144http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#145%23145http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#146%23146http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#146%23146http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#147%23147http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#148%23148http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#148%23148http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#149%23149http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#149%23149http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#128%23128http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#129%23129http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#130%23130http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#131%23131http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#132%23132http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#133%23133http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#134%23134http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#135%23135http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#136%23136http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#137%23137http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#138%23138http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#139%23139http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#140%23140http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#141%23141http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#142%23142http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#143%23143http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#144%23144http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#145%23145http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#146%23146http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#147%23147http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#148%23148http://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/webster/ccac02-IIIc.htm#149%23149
-
8/13/2019 Crosscurrents in Adv Christology
40/202
men came into the world in the same state
peaking of eth= ust one step awa) from Adam= $llen hite sa)sE
Beth was aworth) character= and was to take the place of Abel in
right+doing. et he was a sonof Adam= like sinful Cain= and
inherited from the nature of Adam no more naturalgoodness than did
Cain. He was born in sin...B1*/And )et with regard to Christ whowas
born 4=666 )ears later and Baccepted the results of the working of
the great lawof heredit)=B1*1we have noted that $llen hite sa)s
that He was Bborn without thetaint of sin.B1*2Here is a clear
contrast between eth and Christ. !ne was born in sinand the !ther
was born without sin.
&ote the great gulf between Christ and the ChristianE Batan
could find nothing in theon of (od that would enable him to gain a
victor). He had kept His /ather3scommandments= and there was n