7/29/2019 criticaL THINIKING PP2 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/critical-thiniking-pp2 1/21 Distinguishing Arguments from Non-arguments The aim of this tutorial is to help you identify arguments and distinguish them from various kinds of non-arguments. Chapter 2
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Notice three important things that follow from thisdefinition:
1. Arguments consist entirely of statements, i.e., sentences that it
makes sense to regard as either true or false. Questions,commands, exclamations, and other kinds of nonstatementscannot be parts of arguments. (Keep in mind, however, thatrhetorical questions should be treated as statements.)
2. No single statement, however long, complex, or controversial,is an argument. Arguments always consist of at least twostatements.
3. Nothing counts as an argument unless it is claimed or intended
that one statement follows from one or more other statementsin the passage. In other words, a passage is an argument onlyif the speaker or writer intends to offer evidence or reasons why another statement should be accepted as true.
Planet Earth was much drier in the Triassic than it is now,and there were large deserts in inland areas. There were no
flowering plants or grasses--they evolved much later. Themost common trees were conifers, similar to today's pines.Other large plants included yews, ginkgos, and thepalmlike cycads. Moisture-loving ferns and horsetailsthrived by lakes and rivers.Philip Whitfield, Simon & Schuster's Children's Guide to Dinosaurs and Other Prehistoric Animals , 1992)
This passage is a report.
A report is a statement or group of statements intended simply to
convey information about a subject.
Keep in mind that reports of other people's arguments should beregarded as reports rather than as arguments.
1. Begin each day with a prayer. 2. Work hard. 3. Love yourfamily. 4. Make light of your troubles. 5. Follow the Golden Rule.6. Read from the Bible. 7. Show kindness. 8. Read worthwhile
books. 9. Be clean and pure. 10. Have charity in your heart. 11.Be obedient and respectful. 12. End the day in prayer. Thesetwelve rules, the "Quaker Dozen," were written long ago in afamily Bible. But I believe they still fit today's problems.(Adapted from Olive Ireland Theen, "Grandfather's QuakerDozen," in William Nichol, ed., A New Treasury of Words to Live
By , 1959)
This passage is an unsupported statement of belief or opinion.
An unsupported statement of belief or opinion is a statement orset of statements in which the speaker or writer expresses his orher personal opinion, but offers no reasons or evidence to backup that opinion.
Almost all groups agree in holding other groups to beinferior to themselves. The American Indians looked upon
themselves as the chosen people, specially created by theGreat Spirit as an uplifting example for mankind. One
Indian tribe called itself "The Only Men"; another calleditself "Men of Men"; the Caribs said, "We alone arepeople." (Will Durant, Our Oriental Heritage , 1935)
This passage is an illustration.
An illustration is a passage intended to provide examples that illustrate orsupport a claim, not to provide convincing evidence that the claim is true.
The three examples cited in this passage are clearly insufficient tosupport the author's claim that "almost all groups agree in holding othergroups to be inferior to themselves." This indicates that the passage isintended to illustrate the author's claim, rather than to prove it.
If Hal comes to the party than Sarah will come to the party.
This passage is a conditional statement.
A conditional statement is an if-then statement. It is an assertion thatsuch-and-such is true if something else is true.
Conditional statements are not arguments because arguments alwayscontain at least two statements and conditional statements consist ofonly a single statement: " Statement A is true on the condition thatstatement B is true."
In the passage above, the speaker or writer isn't asserting that Hal will
come to the party. Nor is she asserting that Sarah will come to the party.Rather, she is asserting that Sarah will come to the party provided that Hal comes to the party. This is a single statement, and thus is not anargument.
I speak English because my parents sent me to boarding
school in London.
This passage is an explanation.
An explanation is a statement or set of statements that seeks toprovide an account of why something has occurred or why
something is the case.
In this passage, the speaker or writer isn't trying to prove that hecan speak English (that's obvious from the fact that he isspeaking English!). Rather, he is trying to explain why he speaksEnglish.
In other words, arguments seek to provide evidence or reasonsthat something is the case; explanations seek to explain why something is the case.
When a democratic society is correctly understood to beone in which the people live under constitutional
government with universal suffrage and with the securingof human rights, economic as well as political, for allcitizens, it must then be recognized that a democraticsociety is not yet fifty years old in this country
(Mortimer J. Adler, The Paideia Proposal , 1984)
Is this passage an argument or not an argument?
If it is not an argument, is it a report, an unsupportedstatement of belief or opinion, an illustration, a conditionalstatement, or an explanation?
When a democratic society is correctly understood to beone in which the people live under constitutional
government with universal suffrage and with the securingof human rights, economic as well as political, for allcitizens, it must then be recognized that a democraticsociety is not yet fifty years old in this country
(Mortimer J. Adler, The Paideia Proposal , 1984)
Argument.
The writer is giving a reason to support his claimthat democracy is less than fifty years old in the United
Although you usually cannot eliminate the personalfeelings that are influencing your perceptions, you can
become aware of them and try to compensate for theirbias. For instance, if you are asked to evaluate a group ofpeople, one of whom is a good friend, you should try tokeep these personal feelings in mind in order to make yourevaluation as accurate as possible(John Chaffee, The Thinker's Way , 1998)
Is this passage an argument or not an argument?
If it is not an argument, is it a report, an unsupported
statement of belief or opinion, an illustration, a conditionalstatement, or an explanation?
Although you usually cannot eliminate the personalfeelings that are influencing your perceptions, you can
become aware of them and try to compensate for theirbias. For instance, if you are asked to evaluate a group ofpeople, one of whom is a good friend, you should try tokeep these personal feelings in mind in order to make yourevaluation as accurate as possible(John Chaffee, The Thinker's Way , 1998)
Non-argument (illustration).
In this passage, the words "for instance" signal us that theauthor is trying to illustrate a claim, not to prove it.
In his book Natural Theology , which set forth the standardacademic and theological wisdom of the early nineteenthcentury, William Paley had compared nature to a watch. If you
chanced upon a watch lying alone on the ground, he wrote, andthen examined its intricate structure, you could not helpconcluding that it had been made by an intelligent designer. Itcouldn't possibly be the product of mere chance. And yet, thenatural world exhibits much more complex order than any watch.Thus, Paley concluded, there has to be an intelligent designerresponsible for nature's fine arrangement(John F. Haught, Science and Religion , 1995)
Is this passage an argument or not an argument?
If it is not an argument, is it a report, an unsupportedstatement of belief or opinion, an illustration, a conditionalstatement, or an explanation?
In his book Natural Theology , which set forth the standardacademic and theological wisdom of the early nineteenthcentury, William Paley had compared nature to a watch. If you
chanced upon a watch lying alone on the ground, he wrote, andthen examined its intricate structure, you could not helpconcluding that it had been made by an intelligent designer. Itcouldn't possibly be the product of mere chance. And yet, thenatural world exhibits much more complex order than any watch.Thus, Paley concluded, there has to be an intelligent designerresponsible for nature's fine arrangement(John F. Haught, Science and Religion , 1995)
[This is the end of the tutorial] X
Non-argument (report).
In this passage, the writer is reporting someone else's argument,not endorsing it as correct. Thus, the argument is a report ratherthan an argument.