Critical Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Systems and Processes (CRISP) National Science Foundation (NSF) Directorates for (1) Computer & Information Science & Engineering, (2) Engineering, and (3) Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences Solicita)on: NSF 16-618 Wenda Bauchpies (SBE) Bruce Hamilton (ENG) David Mendonça (ENG) Robert O’Connor (SBE) Rajiv Ramnath (CISE) NSF, Arlington, V A 5 December 2016 Webinar
24
Embed
Critical Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure … Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Systems and Processes (CRISP ... Type 1 Awards: Projects will be of ... Richard Fragaszy
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Critical Resilient Interdependent Infrastructure Systems and
Processes (CRISP) National Science Foundation (NSF)
Directorates for (1) Computer & Information Science & Engineering, (2) Engineering, and (3) Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences
Solicita)on: NSF 16-‐618
Wenda Bauchpies (SBE) Bruce Hamilton (ENG)
David Mendonça (ENG) Robert O’Connor (SBE) Rajiv Ramnath (CISE)
A mainstay of national economy, security and well-being. • A collection of components (e.g. a fire house,
a human operator, an information display)…
• But also an ecosystem of those components-- interconnected and interdependent---
• Organized in processes that deliver services to meet societal needs.
6
Crit
ical
Infra
stru
ctur
e S
ecto
rs
7
USDH
S:NaF
onalInfrastructure
ProtecFo
nProgram
(NIPP)
hHp://testdh
sgov.edgesuite.net/fi
les/programs/gc_118
9168
9489
44.shtm
Critical Infrastructures are…
• Evolving, as new technologies come on-line; • Deteriorating, as physical components age; • Operating at or near design limits; • Interdependent, in that two or more infrastructures
require each others’ service to function; • Subject to a variety of risks and hazards over various
spatial and temporal scales; and • Producing and consuming an ever-broader range and
volume of data.
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on ICIs
• Mitigating failure and engineering recovery processes in ICIs.
• Understanding computational foundations and opportunities for cyber-based control and adaptation of ICIs.
• Examining relationships between engineering, cyber and social, behavioral and related phenomena.
9
Summary
• Integrated, multidisciplinary perspectives to provide insights on
• design, operation, prediction of ICI systems and processes
• under normal through extraordinary conditions • In order to ensure economic and societal well
being.
Background: CRISP* FY17
• Anticipated Funding Amount (2017): $22.9 million – Type 1 Awards: Projects will be of 2 years in duration with a
maximum total budget of $500,000 – Type 2 Awards: Projects will be of 3-4 years in duration with
a total budget ranging from $1 million - $2.5 million • Project Personnel Requirements:
– at least one PI or co-PI who is an engineer – at least one PI or co-PI who is a computer, information or
computational scientist or engineer – at least one PI or co-PI who is a social, economic or
• Information on awards available through nsf.gov. 18
2016 CRISP: Type 1 Awards
• A Computational Approach for Integrated Network Resilience Analysis under Extreme Events for Financialand Physical Infrastructures
• Computable Market and System Equilibrium Models for Coupled Infrastructures
• Sustainable and Resilient Design of Interdependent Water and Energy Systems at the Infrastructure-Human-Resource Nexus
• A Human-Centered Computational Framework for Urbanand Community Design of Resilient Coastal Cities
• Data-driven Real-time Simulation for Adaptive Control ofInterdependent Infrastructure Systems
• Multi-agent Modeling Framework for Mitigating DistributedDisruptions in Critical Supply Chains
19
2016 CRISP: Type 2 Awards • Interdependencies in Community Resilience: A Simulation Framework • Coordinated, Behaviorally-A ware Recovery for Transportation and Power
Disruptions • Identification and Control of Uncertain, Highly Interdependent Processes
Involving Humans with Applications to Resilient Emergency Health Response • Natural Gas Production, Electricity , and W ater Infrastructures- Economic,
Environmental and Agricultural Impacts in the Texas-Mexico Border Region • Scalable Decision Model to Achieve Local and Regional Resilience of
Interdependent Critical Infrastructure Systems and Communities • Harnessing Interdependency for Resilience: Creating an Energy Sponge with
Cloud Electric V ehicle Sharing • Integrative Decision Making Framework to Enhance the Resiliency of
Interdependent Critical Infrastructures • Critical Transitions in the Resilience and Recovery of Interdependent Social and
Physical Networks • Multi-Agent Sustainable W ater Decision Theory: Nexus of W ater, Road, and
Hierarchic Social Contractual Systems 20
FY16 T2 Methodological Approaches*
1) Optimization: network, stochastic and nonlinear 2) Simulation: agent-based, Markov chain Monte