Credit Suisse Uranium Initiation

DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND THE STATUS OF NON-US ANALYSTS. U.S. Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION®

Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access

03 May 2012Americas/CanadaEquity Research

Diversified Metals & Mining / Metals & Mining

Uranium One Inc. (UUU.TO) REINSTATEMENT

Out of the Blocks and Hitting Stride Reinstating coverage of Uranium One Inc. (UUU.TO) at Outperform. After a period of restriction, we reinstate coverage of UUU with an Outperform rating and 12-month target price of C$4.50/share.

Stronger reserve base and another year of production growth. UUU is targeting another year of production growth with FY12 attributable share of 11.6Mln lbs U3O8 (+9% YoY) at an average cash cost of $19/lb sold. FY13 attributable share of production is estimated to grow a further +7.8% YoY to 12.5Mln lbs U3O8. With average cash costs around $20/lb, UUU remains in the lowest cost quartile of the uranium cost curve and as a result, maintains a strong relative position on EBITDA margins on a per pound (sold) basis.

Seeking an inflection. We believe we are in the early stages of a positive turn in market sentiment towards uranium and uranium equities that would see a return to the historical valuation range on P/NAV of 1.2-1.4x (peak valuation 1.6x) based on: (i) partial restart of Japanese nuclear capacity; (ii) resumption of approvals for new nuclear reactors in China; (iii) expiry of the HEU supply agreement in 2013; and (iv) slower production growth from Kazakhstan. Relative valuations are rich on traditional metrics (P/NAV, EV/EBITDA) vs. peer group metals; however, we believe uranium equities will continue to trade at premium based on scarcity value, lack of investment alternatives and the relatively high barriers to entry associated with uranium mining.

Valuation: UUU well-positioned for recovery in uranium prices. We believe the current spot price of $52/lb is fundamentally supported and a staged recovery in prices more reflective of incentivized supply pricing, in our view between $65-70/lb, will occur over the next 18-24 months. We currently assume $55/lb in 2013, $65/lb in 2014, and $75/lb in 2014. Our 12-month TP for UUU of C$4.50/share is based on a 1.2x our NAV estimate of C$3.57/share. Our target multiple for UUU reflects the low-end of the historical range (1-1.6x).

Share price performance

1

2

3

4

5

May-11 Sep-11 Jan-12

Daily May 04, 2011 - May 02, 2012, 5/04/11 = C$4.44

Price Indexed Price Relative

On 05/02/12 the S&P/TSX COMPS INDEX closed at 12094.38

Quarterly EPS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2011A 0.01 0.03 0.05 -0.00 2012E 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 2013E 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.06

Financial and valuation metrics

Year 12/11A 12/12E 12/13E 12/14EEPS (CS adj.) (US$) 0.09 0.11 0.21 0.31Prev. EPS (US$) — — — —P/E (x) 33.3 27.1 14.4 9.9P/E rel. (%) 233.6 205.2 126.0 95.1Revenue (US$ m) 530.4 619.6 839.6 1,037.6EBITDA (US$ m) 332.9 365.8 557.0 720.3OCFPS (US$) 0.18 0.29 0.38 0.47P/OCF (x) 12.0 10.5 8.1 6.5EV/EBITDA (current) 9.3 8.5 5.6 4.3Net debt (US$ m) 164 266 509 252ROIC (%) 6.25 5.70 7.83 10.94

Number of shares (m) 957.19 IC (current, US$ m) 2,157.40BV/share (Next Qtr., US$) 2.1 EV/IC (x) 1.4Net debt (Next Qtr., US$ m) 305.5 Dividend (Next Qtr., US$) —Net debt/tot cap (Next Qtr., %) 15.2 Dividend yield (%) —

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates.

Rating OUTPERFORM* [V] Price (02 May 12, C$) 3.03 Target price (C$) 4.50¹ 52-week price range 4.44 - 1.94 Market cap. (C$ m) 2,900.28 Enterprise value (US$ m) 3,208.30 *Stock ratings are relative to the relevant country benchmark. ¹Target price is for 12 months. [V] = Stock considered volatile (see Disclosure Appendix).

Research Analysts

Ralph M. Profiti, CFA 1 416 352 4563

[email protected]

Hussein Govani 416 352 4677

[email protected]

03 May 2012

Uranium One Inc. (UUU.TO) 2

Investment summary We are reinstating coverage of Uranium One Inc. (UUU.TO) with an Outperform rating and 12-month target price of C$4.50/share. In our view, we are in the early stages of a positive turn in market sentiment towards uranium and uranium equities that will see a recovery in the spot uranium price and a gradual return to historical valuations for uranium equities of 1.2-1.4x on P/NAV (peak valuation 1.6x) vs. 1x currently. From our perspective, we base changes in market sentiment on key industry catalysts: (i) partial restart of Japanese nuclear capacity; (ii) resumption of approvals for new nuclear reactors in China; (iii) expiry of the HEU supply agreement in 2013; and (iv) slower production growth rates from Kazakhstan.

UUU is well positioned within the global uranium space as one of the largest publically traded producers, a rising uranium production profile, low-cost ISR operations, and a uranium contract book highly levered to the spot uranium price. Our target price on UUU of $4.50/share is based on a 1.2x our cash-adjusted NAV estimate (C$3.57/share). Our target multiple reflect the low-end of historical P/NAV multiples for uranium producers of 1-1.6x and are in-line for UUU relative to its closest peers, Cameco Corp. and Paladin Energy Ltd.

Uranium valuations have substantially compressed Exhibit 1: Uranium peer group valuation table

Price Target ROR Investment Market ImpliedCompany 1-May-12 Price (%) rating Capitalization 2012 2013 NAVPS P/NAV uranium priceUranium One Inc. 2.95 4.50 53% OUTPERFORM 2,824 8.1 5.8 3.57 0.83 59.00

Cameco Corp. 22.47 28.00 25% NEUTRAL 8,881 10.5 8.6 24.33 0.92 59.50 Denison Mines Ltd. 1.88 1.85 -2% NEUTRAL 734 n/a n/a 1.82 1.03 n/aERA Ltd. 1.65 1.35 -18% UNDERPERFORM 864 5.4 1.8 1.35 1.22 72.00 Paladin Energy Ltd. 1.65 3.00 82% OUTPERFORM 1,399 n/a 9.4 2.35 0.70 56.50 Average (excl UUU) 22% 8.0 6.6 0.97 62.67 Average (excl UUU/ERA) 35% 10.5 9.0 0.89 58.00

EV/EBITDA

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Inflection point could see valuations return to historical average 1.2-1.4x (peak 1.6x)

Although relative valuations are rich on traditional metrics (P/NAV, EV/EBITDA) vs. the peer group of other metals (see Exhibit 3), we believe uranium equities will continue to trade at premium based on scarcity value, lack of investment alternatives and the relatively high barriers to entry associated with uranium mining.

Exhibit 2: Historical implied uranium price Exhibit 3: Uranium equity valuations vs. peer metals

-

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

Uranium CCO UUU PDN

Base Metals/Diversifieds

PGM's

Gold (Junior/Developer)

Gold (Intermediate and Senior)

Silver

Uranium

Iron Ore

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

P/N

AV

FY13 EV/EBITDA Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Uranium equities historically trade 1.4-1.6x on P/NAV

03 May 2012


In the 6-8 months leading up to the Fukushima accident, UUU was the best performing uranium stock in the peer group. Post-Fukushima, shares of UUU have performed largely in-line with CCO and outperformed PDN and DML.

Exhibit 4: Indexed share performance pre-Fukushima Exhibit 5: Indexed share performance post-Fukushima

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

UUU looking to another year of production growth UUU is targeting another year of production growth with FY12 attributable share of 11.6Mln lbs U3O8 (+9% YoY) at an average cash cost of $19/lb sold. FY13 attributable share is estimate to grow a further +7.8% YoY to 12.5Mln lbs U3O8. Further, we estimate that in five years, UUU sales will reach roughly half those of CCO vs. 35% in FY12.

Exhibit 6: UUU uranium production by mine Exhibit 7: Uranium sales (CCO, UUU, and PDN)

-

5

10

15

20

25

-

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E

Kazakhstan Mkuju River Honeymoon Powder River Basin Cash cost (rhs)

-

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

2007A 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E

CCO.TO UUU.TO PDN.TO


Low cost position; industry leading margins With average cash costs historically in the range of $16-20/lb uranium produced, UUU remains the lowest cost producer among its established industry peers. As a result, UUU generates the strongest EBITDA on a per pound (sold) basis. Despite being a low-cost producer, UUU has faced challenges related to sulphuric acid shortages at its Kazakhstan operations, which is key to the ISR uranium extraction process. Although supply is not an issue currently, UUU has identified logistical and transport issues which influence the availability of sulphuric acid to its mines. In 2011, domestic sulphuric acid supplies in Kazakhstan were supplemented by imports from Russia, which constituted approximately 36% of sulphuric acid delivered to UUU’s mines.

FY12 cash costs $19/lb.

03 May 2012


Exhibit 8: EBITDA/Lb of uranium Exhibit 9: Uranium cash costs (US$/lb)

-

20

40

60

80

100

120

-

10

20

30

40

50

60

2007A 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E

CCO UUU PDN Ux-Spot Ux-LT

-

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2007A 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E

CCO UUU PDN


Well positioned for leverage to underlying We estimate UUU offers investors the highest leverage to spot uranium prices relative to its closest peers (Paladin Energy, Cameco, Denison, and ERA). UUU’s average realized price is highly correlated to spot prices (90%), whereby sales contracts normally reference average market prices up to 3 months before delivery. As a result, we see below-average market prices in a rising uranium price environment, and the opposite vice-versa during periods of falling market prices. As customary in the majority of uranium sales contracts, delivery schedules are highly discretionary at the customer and as such vary significantly from quarter-to-quarter.

Our principle method of valuation is the discounting of unlevered after-tax free cash flows using a base discount rate of 9% and Kazakhstan country risk premium of 1%, which we calculate using default spread over a default free government bond rate. Exhibit 10 illustrates UUU’s net asset value (NAV) using normalized uranium price deck and various discount rates. We estimate a 100bps change in the Kazakhstan country risk premium impacts NAV by 160bps. Similarly, a 100bps change in the base case discount rate impact NAV by 130bps.

Exhibit 10: Net asset value sensitivity to uranium price and discount rate Uranium price (US$/lb)

3.57 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% 1.96 4.00 6.04 8.08 10.11 12.15 14.18 4% 1.31 2.80 4.29 5.78 7.27 8.77 10.25 6% 1.09 2.39 3.69 5.00 6.30 7.61 8.90 8% 0.92 2.07 3.22 4.37 5.53 6.68 7.82 10% 0.78 1.81 2.84 3.87 4.90 5.93 6.95 12% 0.67 1.60 2.53 3.45 4.38 5.31 6.23 15% 0.54 1.35 2.16 2.96 3.77 4.57 5.37 20% 0.40 1.06 1.72 2.37 3.03 3.69 4.34

*Kazakhstan country risk premium add: 1%

Bas

e ca

se D

R*


Stronger balance sheet required for next growth phase In December 2011, UUU issued ruble-denominated bonds with an aggregate principal amount of $463.5Mln (RUB14.3Bln). In connection with the offering, UUU entered into a RUB/USD cross-currency interest rate swap agreement, creating a synthetic US dollar instrument with an interest rate of 6.74%, bringing UUU’s balance sheet at end-2011 to a

UUU is roughly 90% exposed to spot prices

03 May 2012


cash balance of $619Mln (or net debt $164Mln, including convertible debt) and a D/E ratio of 29% (or 39% including convertible debt). We estimate further capital raising of $400-500Mln would be required to complete the Mantra acquisition option if all conditions precedent, including minority shareholder approval, are met.

Exhibit 11: Cash flow summary incl. Mantra option Exhibit 12: Cash flow summary excl. Mantra option

-

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

(1,500)

(1,000)

(500)

-

500

1,000

1,500

2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E

Operating cash flow Debt/equity capital raisedCapital expenditures+Acquisitions Cash and equivalents (RHS)

-

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

(1,500)

(1,000)

(500)

-

500

1,000

1,500

2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E

Operating cash flow Debt/equity capital raisedCapital expenditures+Acquisitions Cash and equivalents (RHS)


Still acquisitive with a majority shareholder JSC Atomredmetzoloto (ARMZ) currently owns 51% equity interest in UUU having gone through a UUU shareholder approved asset swap where under ARMZ acquired a controlling stake in UUU in exchange for cash and ownership of two projects (Akbastau and Zarechnoye). In addition, UUU has undertaken five major transactions in the past five years. Currently, UUU sources all its commercial production in Kazakhstan, with FY12 marking the introduction of two new mines (Honeymoon, Australia and Willow Creek, USA) as UUU begins to diversify its production base. We believe continued growth through M&A and outside of Kazakhstan is a prudent strategy that balances asset opportunities, operating challenges, and strategic sensibility. Long-term, the optionality on acquiring/developing Mkuju River (Tanzania) would bring non-Kazakhstan uranium production to about 20% of steady-state production.

Exhibit 13: Selected uranium transactions (2006-present)

y = 0.1581x - 0.4708

-

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

- 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Tran

sact

ion

valu

atio

n (U

S$/lb

)

Uranium spot price (US$/lb)

Jun-2009: UUU/Karatau ($0.4Bln)

Jan-2012: UUU/Mantra 13.9% ($0.15Bln)

Dec-2010: ARMZ/Mantra ($1.2Bln)

Jun-2010: UUU/ARMZ ($0.4Bln)

Jun-2007: SxR/EMC ($1.7Bln)

Feb-2007: SxR/UrAsia ($2.9Bln)


5 major transactions over last five years

03 May 2012


Uranium market outlook: sentiment turning In our view, the social and political tolerance for new nuclear build remains dynamic and because of the unique technological and environmental challenges facing uranium/nuclear, industry sentiment continues to be subject to public opinion risks. We remain constructive on the outlook for new reactor build in China, Russia, and India, where we forecast 38GWe new nuclear capacity over the next five years (2012-2016) and total global new capacity of 49GWe. We are negative on the outlook for nuclear capacity in Germany, where we assuming full phase out – in-line with government policy initiatives.

Following Fukushima, several energy and nuclear regulatory bodies, along with utilities undertook significant nuclear safety reviews, regulatory changes, and reactor stress tests. Even before completing these reviews, some countries had closure plans well underway, largely due to expiry of useful life and policy changes due to changeover in government. Since Fukushima, several countries (mostly in the developed world) have re-affirmed their favorable intentions towards new nuclear. A summary of key changes by country, as summarized by the World Energy Council, is seen below.

Exhibit 14: Nuclear energy policy changes after Fukushima (as of January 2012)

Use of nuclear power in principle not being contested Argentina, Armenia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, Finland, France,

Hungary, India, Iran, Mexico, Netherlands, Pakistan, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Use of existing nuclear power being contested

Japan

Use of existing nuclear power being phased-out

Germany, Switzerland

Construction projects not being contested

Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, China, Finland, France, India, South Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Slovakia, Taiwan, Ukraine, United States

Construction projectscancelled, scaled-back or delayed

Japan

Plans/proposals for new constructionsnot being contested United States, France, Russia, South Korea, Ukraine, Canada, China, United Kingdom, Sweden, Spain,

Belgium, Taiwan, India, Czech Republic, Finland, Bulgaria, Brazil, Hungary, Slovakia, South Africa, Romania, Argentina, Pakistan, Slovenia, Netherlands, Armenia, Saudi Arabia, Poland, UAE, Turkey, Vietnam, Belarus, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Lithuania, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Chile, Malaysia, Israel

Plans/proposals for new constructionsprohibited

Germany, Switzerland, Italy

Countries with existing nuclear installations:

Countries currently constructing new nuclear installations:

Countries with plans and/or proposals to construct new nuclear installations:

Source: World Energy Council (World Energy Perspective: Nuclear Energy One Year After Fukushima, March 2012)

We believe a number of positive developments are building in the uranium and nuclear sector over the next 12-18 months, which in our view, serves to potentially turn sentiment in nuclear energy towards a more favorable path and in turn, positively re-rate uranium equities. Our views are based on: (i) partial restart of Japanese nuclear capacity; (ii) resumption of approvals for new nuclear reactors in China; (iii) expiry of the HEU supply agreement in 2013); and (iv) slower production growth rates from Kazakhstan.

Over the last five years, Kazakhstan (currently the world’s largest uranium producer) has grown production an average of 30% (CAGR). Last year, we estimate Kazakhstan grew production 9.8% YoY to 50.6Mln lbs, U3O8 and has targeted 9.7% YoY growth in 2012 (to 55.5Mln lbs). As of 1Q12, Kazakhstan produced 12.1Mln lbs, implying a run-rate of 48.5Mln lbs (or largely flat vs. 2011).

We forecast 38GWe new nuclear capacity over the next five years (2012-2016)

03 May 2012


Exhibit 15: Net changes in number of reactors (March 10, 2011 to April 2, 2012)

Reactors OperatingUnder

Construction Planned ProposedChina 15 3 -1 1 10Germany 9 -8India 20 2 -1Iran 1 1 -1Japan 51 -4 -2 4South Korea 23 2 -2Pakistan 2 1 1 -1Russia 33 1 -1Saudi Arabia 16Ukraine 15 -9United Kingdom 17 -2USA 104 2 -4Vietnam 2 -6Other 153 -2 2 1 -6Net change -8 0 2 5Pre-Fukushima 443 62 158 324Change (%) -1.8% 0.0% 1.3% 1.5%

Source: World Energy Council (World Energy Perspective: Nuclear Energy One Year After Fukushima, March 2012), World Nuclear Association

Prior to the events in Fukushima, nuclear energy in Japan accounted for ~30% of electricity requirements (March 2011). A key policy shift in the months ensuing calls for a reduction in future dependence and a recommendation that nuclear power's contribution to electricity be targeted anywhere between 0-36% in the medium term. Meanwhile, the last of Japan’s 51 operable reactors is expected to be shut in early May for scheduled maintenance and safety checks. In March 2012, the Japan Atomic Industrial Forum (JAIF) predicted a 10-12% electricity shortage in summer 2012. We assume Japan eventually returns to ~30% nuclear capacity factor beginning in 2012 (16 reactors out of 51). The Japanese central government has approved the restart of Kansai Electric’s Ohi 3 & 4 reactors, with prefecture approval in the waiting.

Following Fukushima, the Chinese government suspended its approval process pending a review of plant location, layout, regulatory controls, and safety. China currently has 15 nuclear reactors in operation, more than 26 under construction, and 51 planned. Additional reactors are planned, including some of the world's most advanced, to give a five- or six-fold increase in nuclear capacity to at least 60GWe by 2020. By the end of China’s 12th Five-Year Plan (2015), some 25 GWe of new capacity is planned to be operational, making some 40-45GWe more may be added by the end of the 13th Five Year Plan (2019).

We expect a turn in uranium prices toward end of the year

The spot uranium price has been relatively stable and range-bound in the $50-55/lb range over the past ten months. Near-term, we see continued uncertainty driven by limited long-term contracting, concerns about possible excess German/Japanese inventories, US DOE materials into the market, and general sentiment. We estimate prices in the current range will provide a disincentive for new mines and brownfield expansion. Medium and long-term, we believe the uranium price will stage a recovery to a level that reflects the incentive price for production expansion and exploration, averaging between $65-70/lb over the next five years. Our peak price of $75/lb in 2014 coincides with expiration of the US-Russia HEU supply agreement. Supporting of view, we estimate the market will be in deficit by approximately 6Mln lbs (2% of global demand) in 2014, although it is highly unlikely in our view that prices will return to $100+/lb level seen in 2007.

03 May 2012


Since our last update, only modest changes to our supply-demand forecasts Between 2012-2020, we estimate total uranium demand of 1.97Bln lbs U3O8, down 4% vs. our previous forecast of 2.06Bln lbs. Our new demand forecasts take into account revised assumptions for Japanese restarts and full decommissioning in Germany. In summary, we forecast a net addition of 68 reactors to the current global fleet of 435 in operation by 2020.

Between 2012-2020, we estimate total uranium supply of 2.1Bln lbs U3O8, a slight increase compared to our previous estimate of 2.08Bln lbs (or +0.8%), which takes into account lower supply from higher-cost producers resulting from weaker uranium prices, regulatory delays, and slower construction schedules for new mines, offset by updated supply from Roughrider mine (Canada) and US DOE material. We believe future supply trends will focus on uranium deposits of the highest quality in terms of tonnage, grade, cost, and ability to finance.

In total, between 2012-2020, we estimate the global uranium market will largely in balance (deficits occurring in 2014) with more significant deficits occurring after 2022.

Exhibit 16: Credit Suisse uranium supply/demand summary

-

20

40

60

80

100

120

(40)

(30)

(20)

(10)

-

10

20

30

40

Net

sur

plus

(def

icit)

in M

ln lb

s U

3O8

Net implied surplus (deficit) based onavailable supply

Uranium price forecast (US$/lb of U3O8)


03 May 2012


Exhibit 17: Credit Suisse Uranium supply/demand summary all figures in Mln lbs U3O8, unless noted 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Uranium mine productionNorth America 26.2 29.8 28.1 26.9 25.5 25.2 27.4 30.5 39.3 44.9 48.3 51.1 54.5 South America 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 - Western Europe - - - - - - - - - - - - - Eastern Europe 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Kazakhstan 22.2 36.5 46.3 48.1 50.3 50.3 50.6 58.5 61.1 59.5 55.9 56.4 56.4 Russia & Other FSU 18.9 19.6 22.2 22.5 22.8 23.1 23.8 24.6 25.5 26.5 26.6 26.7 26.8 Africa 19.0 19.6 23.0 26.6 33.9 37.9 41.2 45.4 55.1 54.8 55.0 56.7 59.3 Asia & Oceana 27.7 27.4 25.6 21.3 24.9 23.2 22.0 21.9 21.2 20.4 19.7 22.7 26.7 Other (adjustments) - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mine production 115.4 134.3 145.6 146.0 158.1 160.4 165.6 181.5 202.9 206.9 206.1 214.3 223.8

growth rate 9.9% 16.4% 8.4% 0.3% 8.2% 1.5% 3.2% 9.6% 11.8% 2.0% -0.4% 4.0% 4.4%Secondary supply 54.3 65.9 64.3 57.9 59.2 59.7 30.9 30.9 32.2 37.2 42.2 42.2 42.8 Total supply 169.6 200.1 209.9 203.9 217.2 220.1 196.5 212.4 235.1 244.1 248.2 256.5 266.6

growth rate -1.1% 18.0% 4.9% -2.9% 6.6% 1.3% -10.7% 8.1% 10.7% 3.8% 1.7% 3.3% 3.9%

Nuclear power plant (NPP) forecasts (units)China 11.0 11.0 18.0 15.0 18.0 22.0 27.0 32.0 37.0 43.0 49.0 55.0 60.0 India 17.0 17.0 22.0 20.0 22.0 23.0 24.0 25.0 27.0 29.0 33.0 37.0 41.0 Japan 53.0 53.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 Russia 31.0 31.0 34.0 32.0 34.0 35.0 37.0 39.0 41.0 43.0 45.0 47.0 49.0 U.S.A. 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 104.0 105.0 105.0 106.0 Other 225.0 225.0 212.0 211.0 212.0 218.0 220.0 221.0 222.0 223.0 224.0 225.0 227.0 Total 441.0 441.0 441.0 433.0 441.0 453.0 463.0 472.0 482.0 493.0 507.0 520.0 534.0

growth rate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -1.8% 1.8% 2.7% 2.2% 1.9% 2.1% 2.3% 2.8% 2.6% 2.7%

Uranium demand analysisExisting NPP capacity 174.3 175.4 178.2 175.1 156.0 158.7 162.6 164.7 165.4 166.0 166.7 167.4 168.0 New NPP capacity - - 12.0 18.0 19.0 23.4 30.1 36.6 46.8 51.5 60.8 63.6 74.5 Strategic inventory build - - - - 4.7 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 Total demand 174.3 175.4 190.2 192.3 178.1 192.2 202.8 211.5 222.6 228.0 238.0 241.5 253.0

growth rate -0.1% 0.6% 8.5% 1.1% -7.4% 7.9% 5.5% 4.3% 5.3% 2.4% 4.4% 1.5% 4.8%

Market surplus (deficit)Based on total supply (5) 25 20 12 39 28 (6) 1 12 16 10 15 14 Surplus (deficit) as % of global demand -3% 14% 10% 6% 22% 15% -3% 0% 6% 7% 4% 6% 5%

Excl Russia/supplier inventories (10) 13 14 12 39 28 (6) 1 12 11 0 5 4 Surplus (deficit) as % of global demand -6% 7% 7% 6% 22% 15% -3% 0% 6% 5% 0% 2% 1%

Excluding secondary sources (59) (41) (45) (46) (20) (32) (37) (30) (20) (21) (32) (27) (29) Surplus (deficit) as % of global demand -34% -23% -23% -24% -11% -17% -18% -14% -9% -9% -13% -11% -12%


03 May 2012


Valuation Our target price on UUU of $4.50/share is based on a 1.2x our cash-adjusted NAV estimate (C$3.57/share). Our target multiple reflect the low-end of historical P/NAV multiples for uranium producers of 1-1.6x and are in-line for UUU relative to its closest peers, Cameco Corp. and Paladin Energy Ltd.

Our primary valuation of uranium producers is based on the net present value (NPV) of its mining assets, which we derive using a discounted cash flow analysis (DCF) of mining operations, the market value of interests in listed equity investments, and valuation adjustments. The DCF analysis is applied to after-tax, unlevered free cash flows derived from the underlying life-of-mine plans of each operation and associated technical-economic parameters. The life-of-mine plans for each operation have been interpreted from UUU’s declared reserves and resources statement, which are calculated using the JORC/43-101/Russian C1 & C2 codes for reporting mineral reserves and resources.

Our base-case discount rate of 9% (real-terms) represents what we estimate is the average cost of equity for global mining projects. In addition, our modeling assumes all measured and indicated resources are converted into reserves and conversion of inferred resources of 80-100%. It should be noted that the conversion of resources into reserves requires, among other things, additional definition drilling and infrastructure to demonstrate the economic viability of exploitation. Under these assumptions, our life-of-mine plans include projected expansion and ongoing capital expenditure based on our interpretation of the historical ratio of capital expenditure per pound of uranium production.

To calculate NPV, our discount rate for UUU’s various mining assets incorporate the following assumptions:

• Minimum acceptable rate of return of 9% (real-terms)

• New project risk rate is between 0-4% (real-terms)

• Country risk rate of 0-4% (real terms) – Kazakhstan 1%

Exhibit 18: Net asset value summary Share price (C$/share) 2.95 Net Asset Value SummaryLong-term U3O8 spot price 65 Long-term U3O8 contract price 65 Long-term H2SO4 price 125 Base case discount rate 9%Kazakhstan country risk premium 1%Net Asset Value (NAV) based on unlevered after-tax free cash flows

Beneficial Discount NPV Share NPVall figures in US$Mln interest rate (US$Mln) (%) (US$/share)Akdala 70% 10% 309 10% 0.32 South Inkai 70% 10% 763 25% 0.80 Kharasan 30% 10% 254 8% 0.27 Karatua 50% 10% 451 14% 0.47 Akbastau 50% 10% 490 16% 0.51 Zarechnoye 49.67% 10% 342 11% 0.36 Mkuju River 100% 10% 206 7% 0.22 Honeymoon 100% 9% 42 1% 0.04 Powder River Basin 100% 9% 131 4% 0.14 Other 125 4% 0.13 Gross asset value (US$Mln) 3,112 100% 3.25 - Total debt 568 + Cash 517 + Uranium in inventory 3.456 Mln lbs 156 +/- Adjustments - Net asset value (US$Mln) 3,216 Fully diluted shares outstanding 957 Net asset value (US$/share) 3.36 Exchange rate (US$ per CAD$) 0.9400 Net asset value (C$/share) 3.57 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

03 May 2012


Mantra value option: Catalyst for UUU’s next mine A revised agreement with ARMZ gives UUU a call option to acquire Mantra from ARMZ, exercisable at any point up to June 7, 2013, for a purchase price equal to ARMZ’s acquisition cost of Mantra of ~$1Bln, including any additional expenditures contributed by ARMZ to Mantra or its properties and interest thereon at a rate of 2.65% per annum. On January 16, 2012, UUU announced that it had elected to pay $150Mln to ARMZ which extended the term of the Mantra call option to June 7, 2013 (from June 7, 2012) and resulted in UUU acquiring a 13.9% stake in Mantra from ARMZ. The agreement also provides ARMZ with a put option to sell Mantra to UUU at the end of the option term if all conditions precedent, including minority shareholder approval, are met.

Exhibit 19: Mkuju River Project NPV Exhibit 20: Mkuju River Project NPV (incl acquisition cost)Uranium price (US$/lb)

0.22 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% 0.25 0.71 1.16 1.62 2.08 2.53 2.99 4% (0.02) 0.25 0.51 0.78 1.05 1.31 1.58 6% (0.09) 0.12 0.33 0.54 0.74 0.95 1.16 8% (0.14) 0.03 0.19 0.36 0.52 0.69 0.86

10% (0.17) (0.04) 0.10 0.23 0.36 0.50 0.63 12% (0.19) (0.08) 0.03 0.14 0.24 0.35 0.46 15% (0.21) (0.13) (0.04) 0.04 0.12 0.20 0.28 20% (0.21) (0.16) (0.11) (0.05) 0.00 0.05 0.11


Dis

cou

nt

rate

*

Uranium price (US$/lb)(0.87) 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

0% (0.83) (0.38) 0.08 0.53 0.99 1.45 1.90 4% (1.10) (0.84) (0.57) (0.31) (0.04) 0.23 0.49 6% (1.18) (0.97) (0.76) (0.55) (0.34) (0.13) 0.08 8% (1.23) (1.06) (0.89) (0.73) (0.56) (0.40) (0.23)

10% (1.26) (1.12) (0.99) (0.86) (0.72) (0.59) (0.46) 12% (1.28) (1.17) (1.06) (0.95) (0.84) (0.73) (0.62) 15% (1.30) (1.21) (1.13) (1.05) (0.97) (0.88) (0.80) 20% (1.30) (1.25) (1.19) (1.14) (1.09) (1.03) (0.98)


Dis

cou

nt

rate

*

Source: Credit Suisse estimates Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Technical report on Mantra assets expected 3Q12 The Mkuju River Project is a uranium development project located in southern Tanzania with current activities focused on licensing and permitting. Additional exploration work on the project is being conducted in the area of the expected Special Mining License. During 4Q11, a single rig was operated, with a second rig being mobilized to the site. Drilling was focused on brownfields exploration and resource upgrade drilling to enable conversion of inferred material within the pit designs to an indicated classification. A definitive feasibility study (DFS) relating to Mkuju River is being prepared by UUU and is expected to be finalized by 1H12 and announced in 3Q12.

Exhibit 21: Mkuju River Mineral Resource Estimate (September 27, 2011)

Mln tonnesUranium grade

(U3O8%)Contained U3O8

(Mln lbs)Ore value per

tonne (@$65/lb)Measured 80.3 0.0313% 55.4 44.85 Indicated 59.3 0.0291% 38.0 41.70 Measured and indicated* 139.6 0.0303% 93.3 43.42 Inferred 42.5 0.0278% 26.0 39.84 Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

03 May 2012


Financials Exhibit 22: Income statement (US$ millions) 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E

Revenues 149.8 152.0 326.9 530.4 619.6 839.6 1,037.6 Operating expenses 30.5 51.0 92.0 142.6 211.8 240.6 275.3 Depreciation and depletion 22.6 46.4 97.4 125.2 173.0 182.8 182.8 G&A 48.7 37.9 55.9 50.4 35.0 35.0 35.0 Exploration 14.9 8.8 5.4 4.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 Total operating expenses 116.6 144.1 250.8 322.7 426.8 465.5 500.2

- - - - - - - Earnings from operations 33.2 7.9 76.1 207.7 192.8 374.2 537.4

- - - - - - - Interest & other income (expense) (3,336.2) (230.8) (192.0) (56.4) (37.7) (37.8) (40.9) Earnings before taxes & minority interests (3,303.0) (222.9) (115.9) 151.3 155.0 336.3 496.6 Income taxes 44.2 (185.5) 73.8 62.9 46.5 100.9 149.0 Minority interest - - - - - - - Other (1,013.6) (0.6) - - - - - Net earnings (2,333.6) (38.1) (189.7) 88.4 108.5 235.4 347.6

EPS (Basic) - Reported (4.98) (0.08) (0.31) 0.09 0.11 0.21 0.31 Adjustments 4.97 - - 0.02 - - - EPS (Basic) - Adjusted (0.02) (0.08) (0.31) 0.12 0.11 0.21 0.31

- - - - - - - EPS (Diluted) - Reported (4.98) (0.08) (0.31) 0.09 0.11 0.21 0.31 Adjustments 4.97 (0.01) 0.05 0.02 - - - EPS (Fully diluted) - Adjusted (0.02) (0.09) (0.26) 0.12 0.11 0.21 0.31

Average shares outstanding (Basic) 468.4 475.6 611.6 957.2 957.2 1,103.0 1,123.9 Average shares outstanding (Fully diluted) 468.4 475.6 611.6 957.2 957.2 1,103.0 1,123.9


We forecast UUU’s share of capital expenditure in FY12 of ~$213Mln. We assume UUU will successfully exercise the Mkuju River Put/Call option in 2Q13 and fund its portion (~$890Mln) with cash and equity raise ($500Mln), though numerous funding alternatives exist given UUU’s strong balance sheet and conservative D/E ratio (currently 29%). For conservatism, we assume an equity-raise in 2Q13 at the current share price of ~$3/share.

Exhibit 23: Cash flow statement (US$ millions) 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E

Net earnings (2,334) (38) (190) 88 109 235 348 Depreciation, depletion and reclamation 23 46 97 125 173 183 183 Future income tax recovery (1,014) (206) 25 (12) - - - Minority interests - - - - - - - Other 3,328 214 160 17 - - - Gross operating cash flow 3 16 92 219 282 418 530 Changes in non-cash working capital 33 (10) (46) (49) - - - Other - - - - - - - Cash provided by operating activities 36 6 46 170 282 418 530

Additions to PP&E (217) (68) (108) (152) (213) (272) (273) Acquisition of net business assets - - (10) (17) (170) (890) - Increase in LT receivables, investments & other 123 16 (112) 2 - - - Disposal of assets & other - - (14) 6 - - - Cash provided by investing activities (93) (52) (244) (161) (383) (1,162) (273)

Net increase (decrease) in debt 18 12 164 305 - - - Shares issued 8 1 35 - - 500 - Subsidiary issue of shares - - - - - - - Dividends to common shareholders - - (493) - - - - Other 60 - 648 (18) - - - Cash provided by financing activities 86 13 355 287 - 500 -

Effects of exchange rate fluctuations (12) 5 11 (2) - - - Net change in cash & equivalents 17 (28) 167 295 (102) (244) 257 Cash & equivalent (B.O.P.) 160 176 148 324 619 517 274 Cash & equivalent (E.O.P.) 176 148 324 619 517 274 531

Gross cash flow (GCF) 3.4 15.7 92.4 219.1 281.6 418.3 530.4 per share 0.01 0.03 0.15 0.23 0.29 0.38 0.47 Operating cash flow 36.1 6.1 46.4 169.7 281.6 418.3 530.4 per share 0.08 0.01 0.08 0.18 0.29 0.38 0.47 Free cash flow (180.6) (62.1) (554.9) 17.8 68.2 146.4 257.1 per share (0.39) (0.13) (0.91) 0.02 0.07 0.13 0.23


03 May 2012


UUU had a cash balance of $619Mln at the end of 2011 (net debt $112/Mln including convertible debt) and a D/E ratio of 29%. We forecast a cash balance of $517Mln at the end of 2012 (net debt $202Mln including convertible debt) and a D/E ratio of 27%.

Exhibit 24: Balance Sheet (US$ millions) 2008A 2009A 2010A 2011A 2012E 2013E 2014E

Cash & equivalents 176 148 324 619 517 274 531 Accounts receivable, net 40 42 103 138 138 138 138 Inventories 17 72 91 91 91 91 91 Supplies and prepaid expenses - - - - - - - Current portion of LT recievable & other 31 24 14 2 2 2 2 Total current assets 265 287 532 850 748 504 762

Property, plant and equipment 1,285 1,748 2,730 2,205 2,246 2,335 2,425 Long-term receivables, investments, & other 77 114 107 97 267 1,157 1,157 Goodwill - - - 151 151 151 151 Total assets 1,627 2,149 3,369 3,303 3,412 4,147 4,495

Acounts payable and accrued liabilities 47 66 83 58 58 58 58 Income Taxes payable 13 2 14 11 11 11 11 Current portion of long term debt - 64 - 52 52 52 52 Other - 137 237 13 13 13 13 Total current liabilities 60 268 333 135 135 135 135

Long term debt 61 - - 516 516 516 516 Convertible debt (December 31, 2011) 118 141 206 - - - - Convertible debt (February 15, 2020) - - - - - - - Convertible debt (March 12, 2015) - - - 214 214 214 214 Other liabilities 62 78 116 107 107 107 107 Deferred taxes 375 181 377 337 337 337 337

Minority Interest - - - - - - -

Share capital 3,523 3,823 5,325 5,325 5,325 5,825 5,825 Contributed surplus 132 133 115 193 193 193 193 Retained earnings (2,750) (2,522) (3,194) (3,525) (3,416) (3,181) (2,833) Convertible Debentures 46 46 90 - - - - Total liabilities & shareholder equity 1,627 2,149 3,369 3,303 3,412 4,147 4,495


03 May 2012


Operations Uranium One Inc. (UUU) is Canadian-based and one of the world’s largest publicly-traded uranium producers with a primary listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange and a secondary listing on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. UUU has a portfolio of assets, primarily located in Kazakhstan, as well as the US and Australia, and is operator of the Mkuju River Project in Tanzania. UUU’s major shareholder (51%) is JSC Atomredmetzoloto (ARMZ) which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Russian State Corporation for Nuclear Energy (Rosatom).

Exhibit 25: Uranium One operations


Operating Mines Akdala Uranium Mine

Akdala is UUU’s flagship acid in-situ recovery (ISR) uranium mine located in the Suzak region of South Kazakhstan. A 70%-interest is owned by UUU through the Betpak Dala joint venture, and the other 30%-interest is owned by KazAtomProm, the Kazakhstan state-owned uranium miner and exporter. Pursuant to the terms of its subsoil use contract, the permitted production rate at the Akdala Mine is 2.6Mln lbs U3O8 per year.

UUU’s attributable production at Akdala in 2011 was 2.03Mln lbs U3O8. The concentration of uranium in solution averaged approximately 67 mg/l and the average flow rate from the well fields was approximately 1,923 cubic metres/hr. The well installation program for 2012 provides for the installaion of 274 wells, compared to 226 installed in 2011.

UUU’s attributable production guidance at Akdala for 2012 is 1.8Mln lbs U3O8 at an average cash cost of $16/lb.

South Inkai Uranium Mine

South Inkai is an operating ISR uranium mine located in the Suzak region of South Kazakhstan. A 70%-interest is owned by UUU through the Betpak Dala joint venture, and the other 30%-interest is owned by KazAtomProm. The design capacity of the South Inkai mine is 5.2Mln lbs per year.

UUU’s attributable at South Inkai in 2011 was 2.82Mln lbs U3O8. The concentration of uranium in solution averaged 59mg/l during 2011. Due to the additional well fields in

03 May 2012


production, the average flow rate increased significantly during 2011 to 3,505 cubic metres/hr in 4Q11, compared to 2,784 cubic metres/hr during 1Q11. UUU’s attributable production guidance at South Inkai in 2012 is 3.4Mln lbs U3O8 at an average cash cost of $20/lb.

Karatau Uranium Mine.

UUU began accounting for Karatau on December 22, 2009. UUU's attributable production at Karatau in 2011 2.83Mln lbs U3O8. The concentration of uranium in solution averaged approximately 162 mg/l and the average flow rate from the well fields was 1,543 cubic metres/hr.

The depth of the Karatau deposit is approximately 650-700 meters, compared to approximately 560 meters at South Inkai and 200 meters at Akdala. The average thickness of the Karatau ore zone varies between 10-17 meters, compared to 10-15 meters at South Inkai and 0.8-13 meters at Akdala. UUU’s attributable production guidance at Karatau in 2012 is 2.6Mln lbs U3O8 at an average cash cost of $13/lb.

Akbastau Uranium Mine

The Akbastau Mine is a producing ISR uranium mine in Suzak District of southern Kazakhstan. Pilot production at the Akbastau Mine commenced on January 30, 2009, with UUU acquiring its 50% interest in the mine in December 2010. The production capacity of Akbastau is estimated to be 7.8Mln lbs per year, which is expected by 2016 on an annualized basis.

Production from the Akbastau Mine in 2011 was 2.87Mln lbs U3O8 of which 1.44Mln lbs was attributable to UUU. UUU’s attributable production guidance at Akbastau in 2012 is 1.5Mln lbs U3O8 at an average cash cost of $18/lb.

Kharasan Uranium Mine

Kharasan is an ISR uranium development project located in the Suzak region of South Kazakhstan. A 30%-interest is owned by UUU through the Kyzylkum joint venture, with a 30%-interest owned by KazAtomProm and a 40%-interest owned by Energy Asia Ltd. The project is currently being commissioned for an annual design capacity of 5.2Mln lbs U3O8, with a current installed capacity of 2.6Mln lbs. Pursuant to the terms of its subsoil use contract, Kharasan is allowed to ramp up production to 7.8Mln lbs/yr by 2014. As previously disclosed, performance of the well fields and uranium production has been below expectations. Several causes for underperformance of the well fields have been identified, including (i) lower than expected flow rates; (ii) sanding out of the production wells caused by the fine grain size; (iii) poor quality control over screen size utilized leading to a significant amount of well repair work; (iv) chemical plugging of screens caused by ineffective manual attempts to balance the well fields. We anticipate a slow ramp-up timetable, with UUU’s attributable production guidance at Kharasan in 2012 of 0.4Mln lbs U3O8.

Zarechnoye Mine

The Zarechnoye Uranium Mine is an operating in situ recovery mine located in Kazakhstan, in the southern part of the Syrdaryinskaya Basin in the South Kazakhstan Oblast, approximately 200 km west of Shymkent and 450 km southeast of Kyzyl-Orda.

Zarechnoye is a joint venture in which UUU has a 49.67% interest, acquired in December 2010. The remaining ownership interests are a 49.67% stake owned by Kazatomprom, the Kazakh State uranium company, and a 0.66% stake owned by the OJSC Karabaltinsky Mining Complex.

The design capacity of Zarechnoye's processing facilities is approximately 2.5 million pounds (970 tons U) per year and it is expected that the annualized rate of production will reach this level in 2012.

03 May 2012


An area of Zarechnoye known as Zarechnoye South has not yet been developed and is expected to become operational beginning in 2014. Steady state production capacity at Zarechnoye South is expected to be 1.6 million pounds per year, bringing Zarechnoye's combined production capacity to approximately 4 million pounds per year.

Development Projects The Honeymoon Uranium Project The Honeymoon Uranium Project, located in the uranium-producing state of South Australia, is an advanced in situ recovery (ISR) project. UUU owns 51% of the Honeymoon Uranium Project Joint Venture, which owns the Honeymoon Project. The remaining 49% of the joint venture in owned by Mitsui & Co., Ltd. Planned technical processes for uranium extraction have been confirmed through the operation of a demonstration plant and a field leach trial over an 18 month period. Steady state production levels are expected to be 880,000 pounds U3O8 per year.

Powder River Basin Uranium Projects

In January 2010, UUU completed the acquisition of 100% of the MALCO Joint Venture from wholly-owned subsidiaries of AREVA and Électricité de France (EDF). The assets of MALCO include the licensed and permitted Irigaray ISR central processing plant, the Christensen Ranch satellite ISR facility and associated uranium ore bodies located in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming.

Willow Creek is expected to form the basis of the operating plan for UUU’s projects in Wyoming. The existing central processing plant currently has a capacity of 1.3 million pounds of U3O8 per year, which is expected to be expanded to the licensed capacity of 2.5 million pounds per year.

Mkuju River Uranium Project Uranium One’s 51% shareholder ARMZ acquired 100% interest in the Mkuju River Project by acquiring Mantra Resources Ltd in June 2011. As of June 2011, UUU is operator of the Mkuju River Project

Project Overview

The Mkuju River Project is a large scale uranium development project located in southern Tanzania. Current activity at the Project is focused on licensing and permitting. A definitive feasibility study relating to the Project is being prepared by UUU and is expected to be finalized by mid-2012.

Put/Call Agreement

ARMZ and UUU have entered into an Amended and Restated Put/Call Agreement. UUU has a call option to acquire Mantra from ARMZ, exercisable at any point within 12 months of closing (subject to extension) of the acquisition of Mantra by ARMZ. UUU has elected to pay US$150M to ARMZ which both extends the term of the option by one year to June 2013 and results in UUU acquiring a 13.9% stake in Mantra.

For either the call or put option to be exercised, UUU minority shareholder approval will be required. The total purchase price to be paid upon exercise of either the put or call option will be equal to ARMZ’s acquisition cost of Mantra, including any additional expenditures and accrued interest of 2.65% per annum.

03 May 2012


Companies Mentioned (Price as of 02 May 12) Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO, C$23.05, NEUTRAL [V], TP C$28.00) Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO, C$1.95, NEUTRAL [V], TP C$1.85) Energy Resources of Australia (ERA.AX, A$1.65, UNDERPERFORM [V], TP A$1.35) Paladin Energy Ltd. (PDN.TO, C$1.63, OUTPERFORM [V], TP C$3.00) Uranium One Inc. (UUU.TO, C$3.03, OUTPERFORM [V], TP C$4.50)

Disclosure Appendix Important Global Disclosures I, Ralph M. Profiti, CFA, certify that (1) the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views about all of the subject companies and securities and (2) no part of my compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report.

See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names. 3-Year Price, Target Price and Rating Change History Chart for UUU.TO UUU.TO Closing

Price Target

Price

Initiation/ Date (C$) (C$) Rating Assumption 3/12/10 2.81 3.4 N 5/10/10 2.42 3.2 6/9/10 2.19 3.3 7/19/10 2.88 3.2 8/9/10 3.14 4.2 O 10/20/10 3.87 4.3 11/15/10 4.82 5.4 N 12/15/10 4.5 R

3 3 3 3

4 4

5

NO

NR

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Closing Price Target Price Initiation/Assumption Rating

C$

O=Outperform; N=Neutral; U=Underperform; R=Restricted; NR=Not Rated; NC=Not Covered

The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received compensation that is based upon various factors including Credit Suisse's total revenues, a portion of which are generated by Credit Suisse's investment banking activities. Analysts’ stock ratings are defined as follows: Outperform (O): The stock’s total return is expected to outperform the relevant benchmark* by at least 10-15% (or more, depending on perceived risk) over the next 12 months. Neutral (N): The stock’s total return is expected to be in line with the relevant benchmark* (range of ±10-15%) over the next 12 months. Underperform (U): The stock’s total return is expected to underperform the relevant benchmark* by 10-15% or more over the next 12 months. *Relevant benchmark by region: As of 29th May 2009, Australia, New Zealand, U.S. and Canadian ratings are based on (1) a stock’s absolute total return potential to its current share price and (2) the relative attractiveness of a stock’s total return potential within an analyst’s coverage universe**, with Outperforms representing the most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. Some U.S. and Canadian ratings may fall outside the absolute total return ranges defined above, depending on market conditions and industry factors. For Latin American, Japanese, and non-Japan Asia stocks, ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark; for European stocks, ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe**. For Australian and New Zealand stocks, 12-month rolling yield is incorporated in the absolute total return calculation and a 15% and a 7.5% threshold replace the 10-15% level in the Outperform and Underperform stock rating definitions, respectively. The 15% and 7.5% thresholds replace the +10-15% and -10-15% levels in the Neutral stock rating definition, respectively. **An analyst's coverage universe consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector. Restricted (R): In certain circumstances, Credit Suisse policy and/or applicable law and regulations preclude certain types of communications, including an investment recommendation, during the course of Credit Suisse's engagement in an investment banking transaction and in certain other circumstances. Volatility Indicator [V]: A stock is defined as volatile if the stock price has moved up or down by 20% or more in a month in at least 8 of the past 24 months or the analyst expects significant volatility going forward.

Analysts’ coverage universe weightings are distinct from analysts’ stock ratings and are based on the expected performance of an analyst’s coverage universe* versus the relevant broad market benchmark**: Overweight: Industry expected to outperform the relevant broad market benchmark over the next 12 months. Market Weight: Industry expected to perform in-line with the relevant broad market benchmark over the next 12 months. Underweight: Industry expected to underperform the relevant broad market benchmark over the next 12 months. *An analyst’s coverage universe consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector.

03 May 2012


**The broad market benchmark is based on the expected return of the local market index (e.g., the S&P 500 in the U.S.) over the next 12 months. Credit Suisse’s distribution of stock ratings (and banking clients) is:

Global Ratings Distribution Outperform/Buy* 47% (59% banking clients) Neutral/Hold* 41% (57% banking clients) Underperform/Sell* 10% (52% banking clients) Restricted 2%

*For purposes of the NYSE and NASD ratings distribution disclosure requirements, our stock ratings of Outperform, Neutral, and Underperform most closely correspond to Buy, Hold, and Sell, respectively; however, the meanings are not the same, as our stock ratings are determined on a relative basis. (Please refer to definitions above.) An investor's decision to buy or sell a security should be based on investment objectives, current holdings, and other individual factors.

Credit Suisse’s policy is to update research reports as it deems appropriate, based on developments with the subject company, the sector or the market that may have a material impact on the research views or opinions stated herein.

Credit Suisse's policy is only to publish investment research that is impartial, independent, clear, fair and not misleading. For more detail please refer to Credit Suisse's Policies for Managing Conflicts of Interest in connection with Investment Research: http://www.csfb.com/research-and-analytics/disclaimer/managing_conflicts_disclaimer.html

Credit Suisse does not provide any tax advice. Any statement herein regarding any US federal tax is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purposes of avoiding any penalties.

See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names. Price Target: (12 months) for (UUU.TO) Method: Our target price of C$4.50/share for UUU is based on a target multiple of 1.2x our net asset value of C$3.57/share (9% base case discount rate), which is based on Credit Suisse long-term uranium price forecast of US$65/lb. Risks: The key risk to our C$4.50/share target price for Uranium One Inc. includes sensitivity to spot and long-term uranium and currency fluctuations. Political and regulatory risks must also be considered in Kazakhstan and Tanzania (taxes, royalties, mining rights, trade restrictions). The nuclear energy sector is subject to public opinion risks impacting demand for nuclear power, uranium and consequently Uranium One Inc.'s valuation. Reserve and resource estimates heavily impact valuation. The accuracy of the estimates can not be guaranteed. Uranium One Inc. is currently involved in multiple projects which implies inherent development risks. As with all mining companies there are operational risks involved such as mine collapses, storms, floods, and strikes, which can not be foreseen. Please refer to the firm's disclosure website at www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures for the definitions of abbreviations typically used in the target price method and risk sections.

See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names. The subject company (UUU.TO) currently is, or was during the 12-month period preceding the date of distribution of this report, a client of Credit Suisse. Credit Suisse provided investment banking services to the subject company (UUU.TO) within the past 12 months. Credit Suisse has received investment banking related compensation from the subject company (UUU.TO) within the past 12 months. Credit Suisse expects to receive or intends to seek investment banking related compensation from the subject company (UUU.TO) within the next 3 months. Important Regional Disclosures Singapore recipients should contact a Singapore financial adviser for any matters arising from this research report.

An analyst involved in the preparation of this report has visited certain material operations of the subject company (UUU.TO) within the past 12 months. The analyst may not have visited all material operations of the subject company. The travel expenses of the analyst in connection with such visits were not paid or reimbursed by the subject company, other than de minimus local travel expenses.

Restrictions on certain Canadian securities are indicated by the following abbreviations: NVS--Non-Voting shares; RVS--Restricted Voting Shares; SVS--Subordinate Voting Shares. Individuals receiving this report from a Canadian investment dealer that is not affiliated with Credit Suisse should be advised that this report may not contain regulatory disclosures the non-affiliated Canadian investment dealer would be required to make if this were its own report. For Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.'s policies and procedures regarding the dissemination of equity research, please visit http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/canada_research_policy.shtml.

The following disclosed European company/ies have estimates that comply with IFRS: CCO.TO.

As of the date of this report, Credit Suisse acts as a market maker or liquidity provider in the equities securities that are the subject of this report.

Principal is not guaranteed in the case of equities because equity prices are variable. Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at anytime after that. Taiwanese Disclosures: This research report is for reference only. Investors should carefully consider their own investment risk. Investment results are the responsibility of the individual investor. Reports may not be reprinted without permission of CS. Reports written by Taiwan-based analysts on non-Taiwan listed companies are not considered recommendations to buy or sell securities under Taiwan Stock Exchange Operational Regulations Governing Securities Firms Recommending Trades in Securities to Customers. To the extent this is a report authored in whole or in part by a non-U.S. analyst and is made available in the U.S., the following are important disclosures regarding any non-U.S. analyst contributors:

03 May 2012


The non-U.S. research analysts listed below (if any) are not registered/qualified as research analysts with FINRA. The non-U.S. research analysts listed below may not be associated persons of CSSU and therefore may not be subject to the NASD Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a research analyst account. • Ralph M. Profiti, CFA, non-U.S. analyst, is a research analyst employed by Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.. • Hussein Govani, non-U.S. analyst, is a research analyst employed by Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.. For Credit Suisse disclosure information on other companies mentioned in this report, please visit the website at www.credit-suisse.com/researchdisclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683. Disclaimers continue on next page.

03 May 2012Americas/CanadaEquity Research

UUU_May2012_FINAL.doc

This report is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Credit Suisse AG, the Swiss bank, or its subsidiaries or its affiliates (“CS”) to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to CS. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of CS. All trademarks, service marks and logos used in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of CS or its affiliates. The information, tools and material presented in this report are provided to you for information purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. CS may not have taken any steps to ensure that the securities referred to in this report are suitable for any particular investor. CS will not treat recipients as its customers by virtue of their receiving the report. The investments or services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment services. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation to you. CS does not offer advice on the tax consequences of investment and you are advised to contact an independent tax adviser. Please note in particular that the bases and levels of taxation may change. CS believes the information and opinions in the Disclosure Appendix of this report are accurate and complete. Information and opinions presented in the other sections of the report were obtained or derived from sources CS believes are reliable, but CS makes no representations as to their accuracy or completeness. Additional information is available upon request. CS accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to CS. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. CS may have issued, and may in the future issue, a trading call regarding this security. Trading calls are short term trading opportunities based on market events and catalysts, while stock ratings reflect investment recommendations based on expected total return over a 12-month period as defined in the disclosure section. Because trading calls and stock ratings reflect different assumptions and analytical methods, trading calls may differ directionally from the stock rating. In addition, CS may have issued, and may in the future issue, other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those reports reflect the different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and CS is under no obligation to ensure that such other reports are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report. CS is involved in many businesses that relate to companies mentioned in this report. These businesses include specialized trading, risk arbitrage, market making, and other proprietary trading. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and estimates contained in this report reflect a judgement at its original date of publication by CS and are subject to change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. The value of securities and financial instruments is subject to exchange rate fluctuation that may have a positive or adverse effect on the price or income of such securities or financial instruments. Investors in securities such as ADR’s, the values of which are influenced by currency volatility, effectively assume this risk. Structured securities are complex instruments, typically involve a high degree of risk and are intended for sale only to sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. The market value of any structured security may be affected by changes in economic, financial and political factors (including, but not limited to, spot and forward interest and exchange rates), time to maturity, market conditions and volatility, and the credit quality of any issuer or reference issuer. Any investor interested in purchasing a structured product should conduct their own investigation and analysis of the product and consult with their own professional advisers as to the risks involved in making such a purchase. Some investments discussed in this report have a high level of volatility. High volatility investments may experience sudden and large falls in their value causing losses when that investment is realised. Those losses may equal your original investment. Indeed, in the case of some investments the potential losses may exceed the amount of initial investment, in such circumstances you may be required to pay more money to support those losses. Income yields from investments may fluctuate and, in consequence, initial capital paid to make the investment may be used as part of that income yield. Some investments may not be readily realisable and it may be difficult to sell or realise those investments, similarly it may prove difficult for you to obtain reliable information about the value, or risks, to which such an investment is exposed. This report may provide the addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, websites. Except to the extent to which the report refers to website material of CS, CS has not reviewed the linked site and takes no responsibility for the content contained therein. Such address or hyperlink (including addresses or hyperlinks to CS’s own website material) is provided solely for your convenience and information and the content of the linked site does not in any way form part of this document. Accessing such website or following such link through this report or CS’s website shall be at your own risk. This report is issued and distributed in Europe (except Switzerland) by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, One Cabot Square, London E14 4QJ, England, which is regulated in the United Kingdom by The Financial Services Authority (“FSA”). This report is being distributed in Germany by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited Niederlassung Frankfurt am Main regulated by the Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht ("BaFin"). This report is being distributed in the United States by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC ; in Switzerland by Credit Suisse AG; in Canada by Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.; in Brazil by Banco de Investimentos Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A. or its affiliates; in Mexico by Banco Credit Suisse (México), S.A. (transactions related to the securities mentioned in this report will only be effected in compliance with applicable regulation); in Japan by Credit Suisse Securities (Japan) Limited, Financial Instrument Firm, Director-General of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Kinsho) No. 66, a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan, Japan Securities Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; elsewhere in Asia/Pacific by whichever of the following is the appropriately authorised entity in the relevant jurisdiction: Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited, Credit Suisse Equities (Australia) Limited , Credit Suisse Securities (Thailand) Limited, Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch, Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (registration Nos. INB230970637; INF230970637; INB010970631; INF010970631), having registered address at 9th Floor, Ceejay House,Dr.A.B. Road, Worli, Mumbai - 18, India, T- +91-22 6777 3777, Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, Seoul Branch, Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch, PT Credit Suisse Securities Indonesia, Credit Suisse Securities (Philippines ) Inc., and elsewhere in the world by the relevant authorised affiliate of the above. Research on Taiwanese securities produced by Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch has been prepared by a registered Senior Business Person. Research provided to residents of Malaysia is authorised by the Head of Research for Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., to whom they should direct any queries on +603 2723 2020. In jurisdictions where CS is not already registered or licensed to trade in securities, transactions will only be effected in accordance with applicable securities legislation, which will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may require that the trade be made in accordance with applicable exemptions from registration or licensing requirements. Non-U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should contact a CS entity in their local jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should do so only by contacting a representative at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in the U.S. Please note that this report was originally prepared and issued by CS for distribution to their market professional and institutional investor customers. Recipients who are not market professional or institutional investor customers of CS should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment decision based on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents. This research may relate to investments or services of a person outside of the UK or to other matters which are not regulated by the FSA or in respect of which the protections of the FSA for private customers and/or the UK compensation scheme may not be available, and further details as to where this may be the case are available upon request in respect of this report. Any Nielsen Media Research material contained in this report represents Nielsen Media Research's estimates and does not represent facts. NMR has neither reviewed nor approved this report and/or any of the statements made herein. If this report is being distributed by a financial institution other than Credit Suisse AG, or its affiliates, that financial institution is solely responsible for distribution. Clients of that institution should contact that institution to effect a transaction in the securities mentioned in this report or require further information. This report does not constitute investment advice by Credit Suisse to the clients of the distributing financial institution, and neither Credit Suisse AG, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors and employees accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from their use of this report or its content. Copyright 2012 CREDIT SUISSE AG and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Credit Suisse Uranium Initiation

Documents

uranium mining

uranium prices

uranium equities

uuu of c

uranium cost curve

coverage of uuu

eps us

ebitda us