Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPS T 2007 1 Create-Test-Use and Evidential Bases IHPST Conference 2007 University of Calgary
Feb 25, 2016
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 1
Create-Test-Use and Evidential Bases
IHPST Conference 2007University of Calgary
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 2
Definition of Science Science is the study of the natural world in
an attempt to describe, explain, and predict changes and products.
A goal/purpose of science is to create, test, and use (with confidence) a scientific concept (and then to falsify).
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 3
Epistemological ChoicesWhen Presenting a Concept
Inductive (creating a concept)Hypothetico-inductive (testing)Hypothetico-deductive (testing)Deductive (using the concept)
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 4
Natures of Science Umbrella
Problem Solving
Processes
Skills
N ature of Science
I H-I H-D D
s
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 5
Natures of ScienceLab Type
Nature of Science
Philosopherof Science
Date ofIntro.
Create inductive(specgen)
Francis Bacon
1600s
Test hypothetico-deductive/-inductive
Karl Popper
1930s+
Use deductive(genspec)
Aristotle 300s BC
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 6
Lab Report: ProcessesPurpose Create (I) Test (H-I) Test (H-D) Use (D)
Problem general general specific specific
Hypothesis X mental hypothesis
mental hypothesis
X
Prediction X X specific X
Analysis empirical hypothesis
empirical hypothesis
empirical particular
empirical particular
Eval. 1 evidence evidence evidence evidence
Eval. 2 X hypothesis predictionhypothesis
X
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 8
Creating the Arrhenius Concept of Acids and Bases--inductively
Purpose: To create the Arrhenius concept of acids and bases.
Problem: What kinds of chemicals form acidic and basic solutions; i.e., are acids and bases?
Design: Each of the solutions is tested with litmus paper.
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 9
Testing the Arrhenius Concept of Acids and Bases—H-I
Purpose: To test the Arrhenius concept of acids and bases.
Problem: What kinds of chemicals form acidic and basic solutions; i.e., are acids and bases?
Hypothesis: Chemicals whose formulas begin with H are acids and end with OH are bases.
Design: Each of the several new solutions is tested with litmus paper.
(Note: Say to test, not to verify.)
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 10
Testing the Arrhenius Concept of Acids and Bases—H-D
Purpose: To test the Arrhenius concept of acids and bases.
Problem: Which of the provided solutions is an acid or a base?
Prediction: According to the Arrhenius concept, the acids are … and the bases are ….
Design: Each of the solutions is tested with litmus paper.
Note: embrace falsification (as well as verification).
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 11
Using the Arrhenius Concept of Acids and Bases
Using any concept in laboratory work usually involves qualitative and quantitative analysis—esp. in chemistry.
The Arrhenius concept of acids and bases is used, for example, in the Analysis during acid-base titrations (which may also use the stoichiometric method) and to test the stoichiometric method.
Most often the Arrhenius concept is used outside the laboratory in regular chemistry problem solving; for example, predict which of the following chemicals is an acid or a base?
Create-test-use works within and between laboratory work and normal pencil and paper work.
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 12
Create-Test-Use in the Nelson Chemistry 20-30 Alberta TextbookCTU(T) or (T)CTU cycles1. defining a cmpd.2. intramolecular bonding3. gas laws4. solubility rules5. defining acids/bases6. stoichiometric law7. redox spontaneity
Each major unit in the Nelson Chemistry textbooks start with a falsification (test) lab based upon a previous chemistry concept; e.g.,
the falsification of the Arrhenius concept
the falsification of the assumptions for doing stoichiometric calculations
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 13
Evidential Bases
There are many ways to present evidence in a classroom setting.
There is no excuse for not employing evidence-based reasoning in the classroom.
Schools, teachers and students need choices for how they will gather evidence to create, test and use science concepts.
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 14
Evidential Bases1. thought
experiment2. demonstration3. dry lab (lab
exercise)4. wet lab5. field trip
6. video lab7. video analysis8. simulation/
animation9. computer
probes/sensors10. remote access
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 15
Evidential Bases—1Evidential Base Description1. Laboratory(wet lab)
evidence gathered in the laboratory by the students
2. Demonstration(wet lab)
evidence gathered in the laboratory by the instructor
3. Thought experiment
design & evidence presented verbally by the teacher
4. Lab exercise(dry lab)
evidence gathered for the students and put into a lab format
5. Field trip evidence gathered in the field
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 16
Evidential Bases—using computersEvidential Base Description
6. Computer (or not) video
evidence provided in a video format (to be analyzed by students)
7. Computer analysis of video
evidence is analyzed by computer software
8. Computer simulation
evidence provided in a computer simulation/animation format
9. Computer probes evidence gathered by computer probes (to be analyzed by students)
10. Remote access by computer
evidence gathered in the laboratory by Internet access
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 17
Evidential Bases for CTU CycleLab Type
ArrheniusConcept
Bronsted-Lowry A-B
Lewis A-BConcept
Create(I)
computer animation
use falsifying evidence
use falsifying evidence
Test(HI/HD)
verify in the demonstration
verify in the laboratory
verify in a demonstration
Use(D)
qualitative analysis in lab exercise
in computer simulation
qualitative analysis in the laboratory
Test(HI/HD)
falsify in the laboratory
falsify in a demonstration
falsify in a video lab (more eg’s)
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 18
Create-Test-Use is: a chronological (historical) order a concept that helps to organize a laboratory program a concept that includes, rather than excludes,
alternate views on the natures of science a concept that helps instructors to see from an
external (big picture) view of labs what is missing a concept that helps instructors to be internally
consistent with processes in different kinds of labs a concept that provides instructors and students with
the rules for the knowledge game.
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 20
Evidential bases has a potential:
to ingrain “evidence” as one of the most important words/concepts in science
to improve the quality of evidence presented to students in the classroom
to increase the quantity of evidence that students gather, analyze and evaluate
to increase the quantity of laboratory work
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 21
Ultimate Curricular Goals for Evidence-Based Science Education concept of certainty/uncertainty single- and double-blind studies anecdotal evidence reliability (consistency) vs.
validity (accuracy) peer-reviewed research grants refereed (peer-reviewed)
journals valid experimental designs short- vs long-term studies testing vs. verifying
falsification replication of a study research sample size evaluating evidence placebo and Hawthorne effect tolerance of uncertainty statistical significance risk-benefit analysis tolerance for uncertainty problem solving for everyday
life
Frank Jenkins, U of A, IHPST 2007 22
Acknowledgements My education professors for introducing me to
the history and philosophy of science My textbook author colleagues: Hans van
Kessel, Dr. Oliver Lantz and Dick Tompkins My chemistry texts publisher Thomson-Nelson My high school and university students My CMASTE and CRYSTAL-Alberta colleagues
* Dr. Frank Jenkins, [email protected]