Top Banner
Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station
18

Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

Dec 15, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

Cranberry Station

Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management

Carolyn DeMoranvilleUMass Cranberry Station

Page 2: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

2Cranberry Station

Why is this important?

Page 3: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

3Cranberry Station

What have we done?

• Plot scale work to define P requirement– >0 but <22 kg

• Field-scale: Enlist growers to reduce well below 22 kg/ha (‘not to exceed’ level)

• Collect data from their farms – Crop yield– Tissue P– Water quality

• Use these data to make the case for others to adopt reduced P

Page 4: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

4Cranberry Station

Results of surveys conducted in January 2008 (2007 season); January 2009 (2008 season); March 2010 (2009 season).

seasonManagement choice 2007 2008 2009

N:P P>N 36% 15%

N:P P no more than N 34% 61%

Plan to reduce P use next season 36%

Reduced P use 51% 65%

Page 5: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

5Cranberry Station

Grower P reduction sites study

P rate in kg/ha

Site #P applied

2008P applied

2009P applied

2010P applied

2011 P applied

2012

1 6.6 8.4 10.0 12.3 10.9

2 8.5 9.9 8.2 11.2 8.2

3 8.2 0.7 0.9 0.8 7.5

4 8.7 4.1 10.2 4.9 6.8

5 -- 8.6 5.6 8.3 16.0

6 14.1 8.5 8.4

Page 6: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

6Cranberry Station

Through 2012 season

Page 7: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

7Cranberry Station

Data from 2005-2011

Page 8: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

8Cranberry Station

Standard range = 0.1 – 0.2%

  

  Tissue P % dry weight  

SiteAvg.

kg/ha P 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

1 8.3 0.13   0.12 0.13 0.10

2 8.8 0.16   0.09 0.16 0.13

3 2.7 0.13 0.15 0.11 0.15 0.11

4 7.0 0.15 0.16 0.13 0.16 0.12

5 7.5   0.14 0.11 0.12 0.13

6 10.3   0.14   0.12  

Page 9: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

9Cranberry Station

Comparison of TP in floodreleases

Years of P reductionSite 2009 2010 2011

1 7 8 92 5 6 73 2 3 44 2 3 45 1 2 36 3 4 5

Page 10: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

10Cranberry Station

Harvest flood P concentrations

Page 11: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

11Cranberry Station

Winter flood P concentrations

Note: scale is 10x less than for harvest flood

Page 12: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

12Cranberry Station

Harvest flood

1 acre-foot = 1233 m31 lb = 0.45 kg

Page 13: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

13Cranberry Station

Change (kg/ha released)

Harvest Winter

Year 1 2.92 1.77

Year 7 0.48 ---

Year 8 0.68 0.20

Year 9 0.51 0.19

Applied P

Pre-2003 = 22 kg/ha

Avg. starting 2003 = 11 kg/ha

Site 1

Page 14: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

14Cranberry Station

Potential impact

Site 1 Bog is ~25 ha In 2003, the 2 floods (winter/harvest) contained

117 kg P 8 years later, the floods contained 17 kg P 85% reduction

Page 15: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

15Cranberry Station

Next steps

Continue and expand monitoring study, recruit growers to use 5 kg/ha P

Large grant to begin to install and evaluate methods to remove or minimize P from discharge water – filters, other BMPs

Page 16: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

16Cranberry Station

Questions?

Page 17: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

Cranberry Bog Total Phosphorus

CES/SMASTField Expt.

TP Fertilization

(kg/ha/yr)

TPincoming (kg/ha/yr)

TP leaving (kg/ha/yr)

TP export

(net)(kg/ha/yr)

Bog ID Mean 2003-04

EH 11.2 0.3 4.5 4.2

PV 22.2 1.8 8.5 6.8

BEN 18.8 1.2 3.9 2.7

WS 19.6 0.2 5.5 5.3

M-K 23.1 2.0 3.2 1.2

ASH 39.3 1.8 3.4 1.7

Mean 22.4 1.22 4.83 3.65

A Flow-through Bog was found to have a higher A Flow-through Bog was found to have a higher annual TP loss of 9.9 kg/ha/yr (Howes & Teal annual TP loss of 9.9 kg/ha/yr (Howes & Teal 1995)1995)

Page 18: Cranberry Station Phosphorus in Cranberry Nutrient Management Carolyn DeMoranville UMass Cranberry Station.

18Cranberry Station

Yield (Mg/ha) comparison of 4 or 6 years prior to that in 2008-2011

SiteP 2008-2011

(kg/ha/yr)4 years prior

yield6 years

prior yield2008-2011

average

1 8.3* 17.1 23.9

2 8.8* 17.4 25.8

3 2.7 12.9 14.4

4 7.0 19.9 23.4

6 7.5** ? 22.3**

7 10.3* 17.4 18.0*

**2009-2011*2008-2010