CPUC Energy Efficiency Policies and Investor-Owned Utility (IOU) Programs Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities & Communication Hearing on Energy Efficiency, May 17, 2011 Jeanne Clinton and Simon Eilif Baker California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
20
Embed
CPUC Energy Efficiency Policies and Investor-Owned Utility (IOU) Programs
CPUC Energy Efficiency Policies and Investor-Owned Utility (IOU) Programs. Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities & Communication Hearing on Energy Efficiency, May 17, 2011. Jeanne Clinton and Simon Eilif Baker California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CPUC Energy Efficiency Policies and Investor-Owned Utility (IOU)
Programs
Senate Committee on Energy, Utilities & CommunicationHearing on Energy Efficiency, May 17, 2011
Jeanne Clinton and Simon Eilif BakerCalifornia Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
CPUC Process for Approval / Oversight of IOU Energy Efficiency Programs
• 3-Year Budget Cycle
• Current cycle: 2010-2012• Next cycle: 2014-2016 (with 2013 “bridge” year)*
•Must meet goals•Budgets / Cost- effectiveness•Alignment with Strategic Plan
3-Year Portfolio Implementation
•IOU Administration•Energy Division EM&V and Oversight
*Pursuant to the December 23, 2010 Assigned Commissioner Ruling in Rulemaking (R.) 09-11-014, a 2013 bridge year is expected Slide 2
How the CPUC Sets Direction and Measures Outcomes
1. Efficiency goals set from information on efficiency potential, market assessment, economics. Policy direction based on evaluation findings, stakeholder feedback, gap analysis.
2. Portfolio plans and design/implementation vetted w/ stakeholders; CPUC analyzes for policy consistency.
3. Program designs based on logic models & performance metrics. Utilities report expenditures, installations, estimated savings & key metrics.
4. Program savings verified by independent evaluators managed by CPUC staff. Audit staff assess financial and administrative procedures.
Original Cummulative (D.04-09-060 and D.08-07-047) Current Cummulative (D.09-09-047 and D.08-07-047)
Original Annual (D.04-09-060 and D.08-07-047) Current Annual (D.09-09-047 and D.08-07-047)
Net Net Gross Total Market Gross
Slide 6
* Adopted pursuant to P.U. Code Sections 454.55 and 454.56 (SB 1037, Kehoe, Statutes of 2005)**Pursuant to CPUC Decision (D.)08-07-047, as modified by D.09-09-047
Example: 2020 Energy Savings Goals (kWh)**
2010-2012 IOU Energy Efficiency Portfolios
• D.09-09-047 approved $3.1 billion in 2010-2012 EE funding (ESAP not included):
• Three-year combined savings targets: 7,000 GWh / 1,500 MW / 150 MMTherms– Equivalent to 3 major power plants– Savings incorporated into procurement planning
• IOUs’ approved portfolios were guided by the Strategic Plan– 2010-2012 portfolio is a “transition” portfolio– Many new “strategic programs” – e.g., Whole-house
retrofit (Energy Upgrade Calif.), ZNE building pilots, on-bill financing (OBF)
Slide 7
IOU Forecasted Savings of EE Portfolios Exceed Commission-Adopted Goals
Slide 8
2010 - 2012
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
Commission Adopted 6,967 1,535 151
IOU Forecasted 9,279 1,830 185
GWH MW MMtherms
Residential23%
Commercial28%
Industrial 13%
Agriculture4%
New Construction
4%
HVAC4%
Emerging Technologies
2%
Other *22%
IOU Energy Efficiency Budgets 2010-2012(Total = $3.1 Billion)
*Other includes Codes & Standards; Institutional; Local Government Partnerships (LGPs); Marketing, Education & Outreach (ME&O); Workforce Education & Training (WE&T); Integrated Demand-side Management (IDSM); Lighting Market Transformation; and Evaluation Measurement & Verification (EM&V)
Slide 9
2010-2012 EE Portfolio Highlights
• 12 statewide programs implemented consistently across 4 IOUs
Program Budget Program Budget
Residential $718 M Emerging Technologies $68 M
Commercial $863 M Codes & Standards $30 M
Industrial $405 M Integrated DSM $11 M
Agricultural $128 M Workforce Education & Training $102 M
New Construction $ 137 M Marketing Education & Outreach $ 80 M
HVAC $128 M Lighting Market Transformation $1.5 M
• Local government partnerships ($233M); institutional partnerships ($95M)
• Third-party programs + Local Government Partnerships ~ 1/3 of portfolio spending by non-utility entities
Slide 10
2010-2012 Planned Resource Program Savings
Slide 11
StatewidePrograms
•Residential•Commercial•Industrial•Agricultural
•Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning•New Construction•Emerging Technologies•Codes & Standards
2010-2012 EM&V Objectives• Measure & Verify Savings - for load impact and procurement
planning
• Program Evaluation - for timely performance feedback, improvement
• Market Assessment – For determining baseline, remaining potential, goal-setting
• Policy and Planning Support – Such as goals studies, DEER database, market transformation insight, and other overarching studies outside of core EM&V
• Financial and Management Audit – Ensures adherence to CPUC requirement for efficient and effective use of funds (e.g. administrative and marketing cost caps, prudency, etc.)
Slide 13
New Focus for EM&V in 2010-2012Scope:
• More evaluation of programs in “real time” as implemented
• Studies of markets for new technologies
• Pilot use of experimental design and per capita consumption to inform post-2012 program goals and plans
• Utilizing Program Performance Metrics (PPMs) and Market Transformation Indicators (MTIs) to assess non-energy savings outcomes
• More rigorous audit of IOU administration activities
Approach: • Evaluation requirements integrated efficiently into multi-faceted studies• Stakeholder input invited into evaluation plans
Challenge:• Disparity between IOU’s savings projections and evaluated savings
widening at increasing rate since 2002 as multiple influences operate in ever-busier EE markets
Slide 14
Energy Division Staffing of Demand-Side Management Group
Integrated Demand-Side Analysis(EE, ESAP, DR, DG)
8 / 9
Retail Rate Design
3 / 7
Demand-side Evaluation(EE, ESAP, DR, DG)
8 / 9
Residential Programs(EE, ESAP, DR)
5 / 9
Non-Residential Programs(EE, DR)
6 / 8
Customer Generation Programs(DG)
4 / 7
Demand-Side AnalysisBranch
Demand-Side ProgramsBranch
Total Staffing:
34 / 51
(Filled / Total Authorized Positions)
Slide 15
ESAP = Energy Savings Assistance ProgramDR = Demand ResponseDG = Distributed Generation (CSI Solar & SGIP)
– CEC-administered activities funded by ARRA / SEP - $52M• Marketing, website, financing support, training, (limited) local government incentives
– Local government-administered activities funded by ARRA block grants / DOE “Better Buildings” - $40M
• (Limited) local government incentives, innovative marketing
• ARRA appliance rebates & IOU rebates• Evaluation coordinating group (CEC / CPUC staff)
– Lending CPUC expertise / resources to CEC’s limited ARRA evaluation budget– Ensuring no double-counting of savings
* Note: EUC is residential and commercial buildings retrofit program and brand. Initially, the program is focused mostly on single-family residential. $ figures are for residential sector only.
Slide 16
Commission Staff Planning Activities
• Extending current portfolio through 2013 or 2014 to allow sufficient time for updated analysis, planning, policy guidance– Will require bridge-year funding decision
• Cost-effectiveness methodology update
• Database for EE Resources (DEER) update
• Potential and Goals update
• Strategic Plan update / Action Plan progress report
• Post-2012 EM&V approach
Slide 17
Looking Ahead…• Market Transformation
– Need to distinguish market transformation (MT) from “resource acquisition.” Consider statewide administration of MT approaches?
• Innovation– Many promising technologies. How to bring to market and scale-up
faster?– New business models for EE program deliverers. Develop protocols for
EE aggregators to allow consideration as an energy resource by the ISO?• Competition
– Increase competition for highly effective programs to access ratepayer funds in some way?
– Utilize 3rd-party program solicitations to drive new program approaches and scaling?
• Financing– California needs to find market-specific solutions for EE financing. What is
the appropriate ratepayer $ involvement / support? – Need solutions that allow cost repayment by successor owners or tenants.
What solutions are they, and how structured?
Slide 18
Appendix
Slide 19
Utility Reported Energy Efficiency Budgets for 2010-20121