Top Banner
Assessing Risk of Pediatric Back-over Injuries in Residential Driveways by Vehicle Type Kerrie Pinkney, MD, MPH, FAAP Andrew Smith, MD N. Clay Mann, PhD, MS Gary Mower, BS
30

Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Feb 10, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Assessing Risk of Pediatric Back-over Injuries in Residential

Driveways by Vehicle Type

Kerrie Pinkney, MD, MPH, FAAP Andrew Smith, MD N. Clay Mann, PhD, MS Gary Mower, BS

Page 2: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

PEC 22(6);2006 p 402-07.

Page 3: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Background Nonfatal Motor-Vehicle–Related Backover Injuries Among Children—United States, 2001-2003. 2005;293:1444-1445.

“During 2001-2003; 7,475 children (2,492 per year) aged 1-14 years were treated for non-fatal MV backover injuries in U.S. hospital emergency departments”

Page 4: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Background

• Current Research – Vehicle Design

• Depth of blind spot • Height/weight of vehicle

– Injury Characteristics • Environmental attributes • Severity of injury • Vehicle types

Page 5: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Objectives

• Statewide incidence of back-over injury

• Risk of back-over injury by vehicle type

• Severity of injury by vehicle type

Page 6: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Methods • Study Design

– Epidemiological study of prevalence – Jan. 1998 to Dec. 2003 – < 10 yrs, residential driveway, in reverse.

• Study Sample – SoU Investigating Officer’s Traffic Accident

Report (DI-9 form) – Medical records from Level-1 Pediatric

Trauma Center

Page 7: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Methods • Measurement of Prevalence

– Numerator (number of cases) • Two independent lists:

– State of Utah DI-9 forms – Pediatric Trauma Center medical records

– Denominator (number exposed) – Number of registered vehicles – Polk National Vehicle Profile (July 1, each year) – Passenger cars, minivans, trucks, SUV

» Minivans, trucks, SUV = LTV

Page 8: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Analysis

• Counting Cases How do you estimate the total number of

cases from two incomplete lists?

State of Utah DI-9 forms Pediatric Trauma Center medical records

Capture – Recapture Model

Page 9: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA
Page 10: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA
Page 11: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA
Page 12: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA
Page 13: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA
Page 14: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA
Page 15: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Capture A

Capture B

x12 x11 x21

x22?

Two Fish Captures

Page 16: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Estimated conditionally to number of cases observed in other cells

Capture (A) and Recapture (B) Capture A

+ -

+ X11 X21 N2 Capture B

- X12 X22 N1 N

22

22

xx

N x x x

obs

122111

+=+++=

11

21 1222

xxx x =

Page 17: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Capture-Recapture with Independent Lists

Page 18: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Another Approach

Page 19: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

C-R Assumptions

• Need at least two lists • Population is be closed

– There is no change in population during investigation

• Cases sampled can be matched • Each case has equal chance of

inclusion (in both samples) • Lists are independent of each other

Page 20: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Dependency of lists

• Only two lists – likely biased! – Three or more suggested – Use of Poisson Log-linear modeling

• Estimates missing cases • Magnitude of dependence • Use of GLIM program

– How many lists needed? • “Many” no better than three • Collapse many lists

Page 21: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Results – Statewide incidence of back-over injury

• Traffic Accident Report (DI-9 form)

– 102 children (45% minor injuries, 10% Died)

• Level-1 Pediatric TC medical records – 100 children (85% admitted, 40% ICU, 73 NF) – (4.0 / 100,000 / year)

• Combined data n=175 (7.1 / 100,000 / year)

• Capture Model (~190 unascertained cases) – (14.8 / 100,000 / year)

• CDC estimate (3.1 / 100,000 / year)

Page 22: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

National Emergency Medical Services Information System

22

Page 23: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Current Standing of NEMSIS Registry

23

Page 24: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

NEMSIS Participation

24

Page 25: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

25

Patient Care Report Software

Agency C’s Software

911Center

Patient Care

Report

Agency A’s Software

Patient Care

Report

Patient Care

Report

Agency B’s Software

Page 26: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

V3 Elements

26

Page 27: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

V3 Elements

27

Page 28: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

V3 Elements

28

Page 29: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

V3 Elements

29

Page 30: Coverage and Comparability of Statewide Trauma Registries - NHTSA

Questions?