Cover crop mixtures for integrated weed Cover crop mixtures for integrated weed and nitrogen management and nitrogen management Daniel Daniel Brainard Brainard Department of Horticulture Department of Horticulture Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
30
Embed
Cover crop mixtures for integrated weed and nitrogen ... · Results: Approximate nitrogen fixed, 2006 Drinkwater and Brainard, unpublished Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Cover crop mixtures for integrated weed Cover crop mixtures for integrated weed and nitrogen managementand nitrogen management
Daniel Daniel BrainardBrainardDepartment of HorticultureDepartment of Horticulture
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
MethodsMethods
Cover crops evaluated• Sorghum sudangrass (Sweetleaf II; 50 lb/A)• Japanese millet (12 lb/A)—one yr only• Cowpea (Red Ripper; 150 lb/A)• Soybean (Tyrone; 150 lb/A)• No cover crop
Alone and in 50:50 mixturesDrilled in mid JulyEvaluated in mid September (60 days later)
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
SorghumSorghum--sudangrasssudangrass
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Japanese milletJapanese millet
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
SoybeanSoybean
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
CowpeaCowpea
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
GrassGrass--legume legume MixturesMixtures
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Results: Biomass 2005
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Results: Biomass 2006
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Cover crop(s)
Cowpea 130 b 0.6 bSoybean 166 b 1.3 bJapanese millet (JM) NA 0.7 bSorghum-sudangrass (SX) 20 c 0.2 bCowpea/JM NA 0.6 bCowpea/SX 27 c 0.3 bSoybean/JM NA 3.4 bSoybean/SX 24 c 2.0 bNone 386 a 48.7 a
------000 seeds/m2-------20062005
Results: Weed seed productionAmaranthus powellii
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Years after seed input
Emer
genc
e (s
eedl
ings
/m2)
05,00010,00030,00060,000
Impact of weed seed production on futureImpact of weed seed production on futureWeed densityWeed density
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Results: Nitrogen fixation
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Cowpea Soybean---------lbs/A-------
Alone 45.0 105.0With Japanese Millet 71.8 41.8With Sorghum-sudangrass 31.1 33.2
Results: Approximate nitrogen fixed, 2006
Drinkwater and Brainard, unpublished
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Cowpea Soybean---------$/ lbN-------
Alone 1.56 0.38With Japanese Millet 0.63 0.72With Sorghum-sudangrass 1.45 0.90
Results: Approximate cost per lb N(includes seed and establishment costs only)
Drinkwater and Brainard, unpublished
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Summary Summary
Mixtures of legumes with Sorghum-sudangrass• Reduced risk of weed seed production• But suppressed legume N fixation
not recommendedMixtures of legumes with Japanese millet• Provided adequate weed suppression• Improved N fixation of cowpea• Reduced N fixation of soybean
JM/cowpea potentially goodDaniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
TakeTake--home messageshome messages
Cost of fertilizer makes use of legumes more attractive.
Legumes grown in mixture with grasses may reduce costs, improve N-fixation efficiency and improve weed suppression….but not always.
More research is needed to identify compatible mixtures and optimize their use.
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Acknowledgements• Towards Sustainability Fund
• Robin Bellinder• Andrew Leed• Laurie Drinkwater• Virender Kumar• Meagan Schipanski• Ann Piombino• Chris Benedict• Steve McKay
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Results: Legume nodulation and percent N fixed, 2006
Soybean
Intercrop
None Sorg.-sud. Jap. millet
Nod
ules
per
pla
nt
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
+N -N
Cowpea
Nod
ules
per
pla
nt
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
+N -N
Intercrop
None Sorg.-sud. Jap. millet
39%53%
67%
64%74%
90%
79%
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Related researchRelated research
Rye-vetch mixturesHow much N for subsequent vegetables?Which varieties best in mixture?Impact of tillage on N, and weed management in subsequent crops
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Seed production
SeedGermination
Seed mortality
Seedlingmortality
Cover crops
Cover crops
AllelochemicalsMulch effectsNutrient effects
Seed predation
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Seed decay
100 200 300
30 60 90
20,000 4,260 1,522
Seed rate(lbs/A)
Cost($/A)
Weed seeds(#/m2)
Seeding ratesSeeding rates
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University
How much can How much can legumes reduce legumes reduce fertilizer use?fertilizer use?
Magdoff and van Es, Building Soils for Better Crops
Daniel Brainard, Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University