Top Banner
Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and commutative rings Raheleh Jafari PhD Thesis under supervison of: Mohammad T. Dibaei Faculty of Mathematical Sciences and Computer Tarbiat Moallem University 19 June 2011 29 Khordad 1390
153

Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Sep 12, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Cousin complexes with applicationsto

local cohomology and commutative rings

Raheleh JafariPhD Thesis under supervison of:

Mohammad T. Dibaei

Faculty of Mathematical Sciences and ComputerTarbiat Moallem University

19 June 201129 Khordad 1390

Page 2: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Cousin complexes

Uniform local cohomological

annihilators

Attached primes of local

cohomologies

Page 3: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Cousin complexes

Uniform local cohomological

annihilators

Attached primes of local

cohomologies

Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohen-Macaulay formal fibres

Generalized Cohen-Mcaulay

modules

Page 4: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 5: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History

- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 6: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes

- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 7: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 8: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations

- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 9: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 10: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 11: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes

- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 12: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules

- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 13: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 14: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 15: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus

- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 16: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

- Some comments

Page 17: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Contents

I Finite Cousin complexes

- History- Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes- Uniform annihilators of local cohomology- Some partial characterizations- Height of an ideal

I Attached primes of local cohomology modules

- Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousin complexes- Top local cohomological modules- Application to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

I Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules

- Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus- Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay- Some comments

Page 18: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Def.A filtration of Spec R is a descending sequence F = (Fi )i≥0 ofsubsets of Spec (R), F0 ⊇ F1 ⊇ F2 ⊇ · · · ⊇ Fi ⊇ · · · , with theproperty that, for each i ∈ N0, every member of ∂Fi = Fi \ Fi+1 isa minimal member of Fi with respect to inclusion. We say thefiltration F admits M if Supp M ⊆ F0.

Notation

For each i ≥ 0, set

Hi = {p ∈ Supp M | htMp ≥ i}.

The sequence (Hi )i≥0 is a filtration of Spec R which admits M andis called the height filtration of M and is denoted by H(M).

Page 19: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Def.A filtration of Spec R is a descending sequence F = (Fi )i≥0 ofsubsets of Spec (R), F0 ⊇ F1 ⊇ F2 ⊇ · · · ⊇ Fi ⊇ · · · , with theproperty that, for each i ∈ N0, every member of ∂Fi = Fi \ Fi+1 isa minimal member of Fi with respect to inclusion. We say thefiltration F admits M if Supp M ⊆ F0.

Notation

For each i ≥ 0, set

Hi = {p ∈ Supp M | htMp ≥ i}.

The sequence (Hi )i≥0 is a filtration of Spec R which admits M andis called the height filtration of M and is denoted by H(M).

Page 20: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cousin Complexes

Let F = (Fi )i≥0 be a filtration of Spec R which admits anR–module M. The Cousin complex of M with respect to F , is thecomplex

C(F ,M) : 0d−2

−→ M−1d−1

−→ M0 d0

−→ M1 d1

−→ · · · dn−1

−→ Mn dn

−→ Mn+1 −→ · · ·,

where M−1 = M and for n > −1,Mn = ⊕

p∈Fn

(Coker dn−2)p.

I We denote the Cousin complex of M with respect toM–height filtration, H(M), by CR(M).

I We denote the nth cohomology of CR(M) byHn

M := Ker dn/Im dn−1.

I We call the Cousin complex CR(M) finite whenever each HnM

is finite as R–module.

Page 21: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cousin Complexes

Let F = (Fi )i≥0 be a filtration of Spec R which admits anR–module M. The Cousin complex of M with respect to F , is thecomplex

C(F ,M) : 0d−2

−→ M−1d−1

−→ M0 d0

−→ M1 d1

−→ · · · dn−1

−→ Mn dn

−→ Mn+1 −→ · · ·,

where M−1 = M and for n > −1,Mn = ⊕

p∈Fn

(Coker dn−2)p.

I We denote the Cousin complex of M with respect toM–height filtration, H(M), by CR(M).

I We denote the nth cohomology of CR(M) byHn

M := Ker dn/Im dn−1.

I We call the Cousin complex CR(M) finite whenever each HnM

is finite as R–module.

Page 22: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cousin Complexes

Let F = (Fi )i≥0 be a filtration of Spec R which admits anR–module M. The Cousin complex of M with respect to F , is thecomplex

C(F ,M) : 0d−2

−→ M−1d−1

−→ M0 d0

−→ M1 d1

−→ · · · dn−1

−→ Mn dn

−→ Mn+1 −→ · · ·,

where M−1 = M and for n > −1,Mn = ⊕

p∈Fn

(Coker dn−2)p.

I We denote the Cousin complex of M with respect toM–height filtration, H(M), by CR(M).

I We denote the nth cohomology of CR(M) byHn

M := Ker dn/Im dn−1.

I We call the Cousin complex CR(M) finite whenever each HnM

is finite as R–module.

Page 23: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cousin Complexes

Let F = (Fi )i≥0 be a filtration of Spec R which admits anR–module M. The Cousin complex of M with respect to F , is thecomplex

C(F ,M) : 0d−2

−→ M−1d−1

−→ M0 d0

−→ M1 d1

−→ · · · dn−1

−→ Mn dn

−→ Mn+1 −→ · · ·,

where M−1 = M and for n > −1,Mn = ⊕

p∈Fn

(Coker dn−2)p.

I We denote the Cousin complex of M with respect toM–height filtration, H(M), by CR(M).

I We denote the nth cohomology of CR(M) byHn

M := Ker dn/Im dn−1.

I We call the Cousin complex CR(M) finite whenever each HnM

is finite as R–module.

Page 24: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cousin Complexes

Throughout R is a commutative, noetherian ring with non–zeroidentity and M is a finitely generated R–module.

Page 25: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

History

Sharp (1970) shows that M is Cohen-Macaulay if and only if theCousin complex of M, C(M), is exact.

Sharp and Schenzel (1994) show that M satisfies the condition(Sn) if and only if CR(M) is exact at ith term for i ≤ n − 2.

Question

What rings or modules admit finite Cousin complexes and whatproperties these rings or modules have?

Page 26: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

History

Sharp (1970) shows that M is Cohen-Macaulay if and only if theCousin complex of M, C(M), is exact.

Sharp and Schenzel (1994) show that M satisfies the condition(Sn) if and only if CR(M) is exact at ith term for i ≤ n − 2.

Question

What rings or modules admit finite Cousin complexes and whatproperties these rings or modules have?

Page 27: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

History

Sharp (1970) shows that M is Cohen-Macaulay if and only if theCousin complex of M, C(M), is exact.

Sharp and Schenzel (1994) show that M satisfies the condition(Sn) if and only if CR(M) is exact at ith term for i ≤ n − 2.

Question

What rings or modules admit finite Cousin complexes and whatproperties these rings or modules have?

Page 28: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

CM

Page 29: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

CM

Page 30: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

History

Dibaei and Tousi (1998) show that if a local ring R which satisfiesthe condition (S2), possesses a dualizing complex, then the Cousincomplex of the canonical module of R is finite.

Dibaei and Tousi (1998) show that if a local ring R satisfies thecondition (S2) and has a canonical module K , then finiteness ofcohomologies of the Cousin complex of K with respect to a certainfiltration is necessary and sufficient condition for R to possess adualizing complex.

Dibaei and Tousi (2001) show that CR(M) is finite, when R is alocal ring which has a dualizing complex and M is equidimensionalwhich satisfies the condition (S2).

Page 31: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

History

Dibaei and Tousi (1998) show that if a local ring R which satisfiesthe condition (S2), possesses a dualizing complex, then the Cousincomplex of the canonical module of R is finite.

Dibaei and Tousi (1998) show that if a local ring R satisfies thecondition (S2) and has a canonical module K , then finiteness ofcohomologies of the Cousin complex of K with respect to a certainfiltration is necessary and sufficient condition for R to possess adualizing complex.

Dibaei and Tousi (2001) show that CR(M) is finite, when R is alocal ring which has a dualizing complex and M is equidimensionalwhich satisfies the condition (S2).

Page 32: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

History

Dibaei and Tousi (1998) show that if a local ring R which satisfiesthe condition (S2), possesses a dualizing complex, then the Cousincomplex of the canonical module of R is finite.

Dibaei and Tousi (1998) show that if a local ring R satisfies thecondition (S2) and has a canonical module K , then finiteness ofcohomologies of the Cousin complex of K with respect to a certainfiltration is necessary and sufficient condition for R to possess adualizing complex.

Dibaei and Tousi (2001) show that CR(M) is finite, when R is alocal ring which has a dualizing complex and M is equidimensionalwhich satisfies the condition (S2).

Page 33: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

History

”Dibaei (2005)” proves that when all formal fibres of R areCohen-Macaulay and M satisfies (S2), if M is equidimensional,then CR(M) is finite.

Page 34: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if M is equidimensional and

(i) R is universally catenary,

(ii) all the formal fibers of all the localizations of R areCohen-Macaulay,

(iii) the Cohen-Macaulay locus of each finitely generatedR–algebra is open,

Then CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a catenary ring. Then thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R satisfies the conditions (i), (ii) and (iii).

for any finitely generated equidimensional R–module M,CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Page 35: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if M is equidimensional and

(i) R is universally catenary,

(ii) all the formal fibers of all the localizations of R areCohen-Macaulay,

(iii) the Cohen-Macaulay locus of each finitely generatedR–algebra is open,

Then CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a catenary ring. Then thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R satisfies the conditions (i), (ii) and (iii).

for any finitely generated equidimensional R–module M,CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Page 36: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if M is equidimensional and

(i) R is universally catenary,

(ii) all the formal fibers of all the localizations of R areCohen-Macaulay,

(iii) the Cohen-Macaulay locus of each finitely generatedR–algebra is open,

Then CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a catenary ring. Then thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R satisfies the conditions (i), (ii) and (iii).

for any finitely generated equidimensional R–module M,CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Page 37: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if M is equidimensional and

(i) R is universally catenary,

(ii) all the formal fibers of all the localizations of R areCohen-Macaulay,

(iii) the Cohen-Macaulay locus of each finitely generatedR–algebra is open,

Then CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a catenary ring. Then thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R satisfies the conditions (i), (ii) and (iii).

for any finitely generated equidimensional R–module M,CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Page 38: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if M is equidimensional and

(i) R is universally catenary,

(ii) all the formal fibers of all the localizations of R areCohen-Macaulay,

(iii) the Cohen-Macaulay locus of each finitely generatedR–algebra is open,

Then CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a catenary ring. Then thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R satisfies the conditions (i), (ii) and (iii).

for any finitely generated equidimensional R–module M,CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Page 39: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if M is equidimensional and

(i) R is universally catenary,

(ii) all the formal fibers of all the localizations of R areCohen-Macaulay,

(iii) the Cohen-Macaulay locus of each finitely generatedR–algebra is open,

Then CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a catenary ring. Then thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R satisfies the conditions (i), (ii) and (iii).

for any finitely generated equidimensional R–module M,CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Page 40: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if M is equidimensional and

(i) R is universally catenary,

(ii) all the formal fibers of all the localizations of R areCohen-Macaulay,

(iii) the Cohen-Macaulay locus of each finitely generatedR–algebra is open,

Then CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a catenary ring. Then thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R satisfies the conditions (i), (ii) and (iii).

for any finitely generated equidimensional R–module M,CR(M) is finite and finitely many of its cohomologies arenon–zero.

Page 41: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a universally catenary local ringwith Cohen-Macaulay formal fibres and M is an equidimensionalR–module, then CR(M) is finite.

In the proof of the above result, the assumption that R isuniversally catenary, is used to show that M is equidimensional.So one may consider this theorem as a generalization of the resultof Dibaei (2005).

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring such that all of its formal fibersare Cohen-Macaulay and M is an equidimensional R–module.Then CR(M) is finite.

Page 42: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a universally catenary local ringwith Cohen-Macaulay formal fibres and M is an equidimensionalR–module, then CR(M) is finite.

In the proof of the above result, the assumption that R isuniversally catenary, is used to show that M is equidimensional.So one may consider this theorem as a generalization of the resultof Dibaei (2005).

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring such that all of its formal fibersare Cohen-Macaulay and M is an equidimensional R–module.Then CR(M) is finite.

Page 43: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Kawasaki (2008) shows that if R is a universally catenary local ringwith Cohen-Macaulay formal fibres and M is an equidimensionalR–module, then CR(M) is finite.

In the proof of the above result, the assumption that R isuniversally catenary, is used to show that M is equidimensional.So one may consider this theorem as a generalization of the resultof Dibaei (2005).

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring such that all of its formal fibersare Cohen-Macaulay and M is an equidimensional R–module.Then CR(M) is finite.

Page 44: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring.

I If 0 −→ Lf−→ M

g−→ N is an exact sequence of R–moduleswith the property that htMp ≥ 2 for all p ∈ Supp N, then

CR(L)′ ∼= CR(M)′;

in particular, CR(L) is finite if and only if CR(M) is finite.

I If Lf−→ M

g−→ N −→ 0 is an exact sequence of R–moduleswith the property that htMp ≥ 1 for all p ∈ Supp L, then

CR(M)′ ∼= CR(N)′;

in particular, CR(M) is finite if and only if CR(N) is finite.

Page 45: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring.

I If 0 −→ Lf−→ M

g−→ N is an exact sequence of R–moduleswith the property that htMp ≥ 2 for all p ∈ Supp N, then

CR(L)′ ∼= CR(M)′;

in particular, CR(L) is finite if and only if CR(M) is finite.

I If Lf−→ M

g−→ N −→ 0 is an exact sequence of R–moduleswith the property that htMp ≥ 1 for all p ∈ Supp L, then

CR(M)′ ∼= CR(N)′;

in particular, CR(M) is finite if and only if CR(N) is finite.

Page 46: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes

Cor .

If (R,m) is local, then there is a finitely generated R–module Nwhich satisfies the condition (S1) with Supp N = Supp M andHi

N∼= Hi

M for all i ≥ 0.

Cor .

If (R,m) is a homomorphic image of a Gorenstein local ring, thenthere is a finitely generated R–module N which satisfies thecondition (S2) with Supp N = Supp M and Hi

N∼= Hi

M for all i ≥ 0.

Page 47: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes

Cor .

If (R,m) is local, then there is a finitely generated R–module Nwhich satisfies the condition (S1) with Supp N = Supp M andHi

N∼= Hi

M for all i ≥ 0.

Cor .

If (R,m) is a homomorphic image of a Gorenstein local ring, thenthere is a finitely generated R–module N which satisfies thecondition (S2) with Supp N = Supp M and Hi

N∼= Hi

M for all i ≥ 0.

Page 48: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes

Rem.

If M is of finite dimension and that CR(M) is finite, then⋂i≥−1

(0 :R Hi ) 6⊆⋃

p∈MinM

p.

•••Assume that a is an ideal of R such that aM 6= M. Then, for eachinteger r with 0 ≤ r < htMa,

r−1∏i=−1

(0 :R Hi ) ⊆r⋂

i=0

(0 :R Ext iR(R/a,M)) ⊆

r⋂i=0

(0 :R Hia(M)).

Page 49: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohomology modules of Cousin complexes

Rem.

If M is of finite dimension and that CR(M) is finite, then⋂i≥−1

(0 :R Hi ) 6⊆⋃

p∈MinM

p.

•••Assume that a is an ideal of R such that aM 6= M. Then, for eachinteger r with 0 ≤ r < htMa,

r−1∏i=−1

(0 :R Hi ) ⊆r⋂

i=0

(0 :R Ext iR(R/a,M)) ⊆

r⋂i=0

(0 :R Hia(M)).

Page 50: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Def.x ∈ R is called a uniform local cohomological annihilator ofM, if x ∈ R \ ∪p∈MinMp and for each maximal ideal m of R,

xHim(M) = 0 for all i < dim Mm.

x is called a strong uniform local cohomological annihilator ofM if x is a uniform local cohomological annihilator of Mp forevery prime ideal p in Supp M.

We use the notation u.l.c.a instead of uniform local cohomologicalannihilator, for short.

Page 51: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Def.x ∈ R is called a uniform local cohomological annihilator ofM, if x ∈ R \ ∪p∈MinMp and for each maximal ideal m of R,

xHim(M) = 0 for all i < dim Mm.

x is called a strong uniform local cohomological annihilator ofM if x is a uniform local cohomological annihilator of Mp forevery prime ideal p in Supp M.

We use the notation u.l.c.a instead of uniform local cohomologicalannihilator, for short.

Page 52: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Def.x ∈ R is called a uniform local cohomological annihilator ofM, if x ∈ R \ ∪p∈MinMp and for each maximal ideal m of R,

xHim(M) = 0 for all i < dim Mm.

x is called a strong uniform local cohomological annihilator ofM if x is a uniform local cohomological annihilator of Mp forevery prime ideal p in Supp M.

We use the notation u.l.c.a instead of uniform local cohomologicalannihilator, for short.

Page 53: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Def.x ∈ R is called a uniform local cohomological annihilator ofM, if x ∈ R \ ∪p∈MinMp and for each maximal ideal m of R,

xHim(M) = 0 for all i < dim Mm.

x is called a strong uniform local cohomological annihilator ofM if x is a uniform local cohomological annihilator of Mp forevery prime ideal p in Supp M.

We use the notation u.l.c.a instead of uniform local cohomologicalannihilator, for short.

Page 54: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

•••Assume that M is of finite dimension and that CR(M) is finite.Then M has a u.l.c.a

Page 55: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Zhou (2006) proves that over a ring R of finite dimension d , thefollowing conditions are equivalent.

R has a u.l.c.a.

R is locally equidimensional, and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allminimal prime ideal p of R.

•••The following conditions are equivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

M is locally equidimensional and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allp ∈ Min M.

Page 56: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Zhou (2006) proves that over a ring R of finite dimension d , thefollowing conditions are equivalent.

R has a u.l.c.a.

R is locally equidimensional, and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allminimal prime ideal p of R.

•••The following conditions are equivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

M is locally equidimensional and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allp ∈ Min M.

Page 57: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Zhou (2006) proves that over a ring R of finite dimension d , thefollowing conditions are equivalent.

R has a u.l.c.a.

R is locally equidimensional, and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allminimal prime ideal p of R.

•••The following conditions are equivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

M is locally equidimensional and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allp ∈ Min M.

Page 58: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Zhou (2006) proves that over a ring R of finite dimension d , thefollowing conditions are equivalent.

R has a u.l.c.a.

R is locally equidimensional, and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allminimal prime ideal p of R.

•••The following conditions are equivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

M is locally equidimensional and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allp ∈ Min M.

Page 59: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Zhou (2006) proves that over a ring R of finite dimension d , thefollowing conditions are equivalent.

R has a u.l.c.a.

R is locally equidimensional, and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allminimal prime ideal p of R.

•••The following conditions are equivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

M is locally equidimensional and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allp ∈ Min M.

Page 60: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Zhou (2006) proves that over a ring R of finite dimension d , thefollowing conditions are equivalent.

R has a u.l.c.a.

R is locally equidimensional, and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allminimal prime ideal p of R.

•••The following conditions are equivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

M is locally equidimensional and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allp ∈ Min M.

Page 61: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Zhou (2006) proves that over a ring R of finite dimension d , thefollowing conditions are equivalent.

R has a u.l.c.a.

R is locally equidimensional, and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allminimal prime ideal p of R.

•••The following conditions are equivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

M is locally equidimensional and R/p has a u.l.c.a for allp ∈ Min M.

Page 62: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Cor .

Let M and N be finitely generated R–modules of finite dimensionssuch that Supp M = Supp N. Then the following conditions areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

N has a u.l.c.a.

Cor .

If M has a u.l.c.a, then M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

•••If CR(M) is finite, M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

Page 63: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Cor .

Let M and N be finitely generated R–modules of finite dimensionssuch that Supp M = Supp N. Then the following conditions areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

N has a u.l.c.a.

Cor .

If M has a u.l.c.a, then M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

•••If CR(M) is finite, M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

Page 64: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Cor .

Let M and N be finitely generated R–modules of finite dimensionssuch that Supp M = Supp N. Then the following conditions areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

N has a u.l.c.a.

Cor .

If M has a u.l.c.a, then M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

•••If CR(M) is finite, M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

Page 65: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Cor .

Let M and N be finitely generated R–modules of finite dimensionssuch that Supp M = Supp N. Then the following conditions areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

N has a u.l.c.a.

Cor .

If M has a u.l.c.a, then M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

•••If CR(M) is finite, M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

Page 66: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

Cor .

Let M and N be finitely generated R–modules of finite dimensionssuch that Supp M = Supp N. Then the following conditions areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

N has a u.l.c.a.

Cor .

If M has a u.l.c.a, then M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

•••If CR(M) is finite, M is equidimensional and R/0 :R M isuniversally catenary.

Page 67: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Example

Consider a noetherian local ring R of dimension d > 2. Chooseany pair of prime ideals p and q of R with conditions dim R/p = 2,dim R/q = 1, and p 6⊆ q. Then Min R/pq = {p, q} and so R/pq isnot an equidimensional R–module and thus its Cousin complex isnot finite.

Page 68: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

•••Let (R,m) be local and M be a finitely generated R–module withdimension d = dim M > 1. Then the following statements areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

R/0 :R M is catenary and equidimensional, there exists aparameter element x of M such thatMin (M/xM) ∩ Ass M = ∅ and all modules M/x tM, t ∈ N,have a common u.l.c.a.

•••Let (R,m) be a local ring. If CR(M) is finite, then M/xM has au.l.c.a for any parameter element x of M.

Page 69: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

•••Let (R,m) be local and M be a finitely generated R–module withdimension d = dim M > 1. Then the following statements areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

R/0 :R M is catenary and equidimensional, there exists aparameter element x of M such thatMin (M/xM) ∩ Ass M = ∅ and all modules M/x tM, t ∈ N,have a common u.l.c.a.

•••Let (R,m) be a local ring. If CR(M) is finite, then M/xM has au.l.c.a for any parameter element x of M.

Page 70: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

•••Let (R,m) be local and M be a finitely generated R–module withdimension d = dim M > 1. Then the following statements areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

R/0 :R M is catenary and equidimensional, there exists aparameter element x of M such thatMin (M/xM) ∩ Ass M = ∅ and all modules M/x tM, t ∈ N,have a common u.l.c.a.

•••Let (R,m) be a local ring. If CR(M) is finite, then M/xM has au.l.c.a for any parameter element x of M.

Page 71: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Uniform annihilators of local cohomology

•••Let (R,m) be local and M be a finitely generated R–module withdimension d = dim M > 1. Then the following statements areequivalent.

M has a u.l.c.a.

R/0 :R M is catenary and equidimensional, there exists aparameter element x of M such thatMin (M/xM) ∩ Ass M = ∅ and all modules M/x tM, t ∈ N,have a common u.l.c.a.

•••Let (R,m) be a local ring. If CR(M) is finite, then M/xM has au.l.c.a for any parameter element x of M.

Page 72: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some partial characterizations

•••Assume that R is universally catenary and all formal fibres of R areCohen-Macaulay. If M is equidimensional, then CR(M) is finite; inparticular M has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

•••Assume that (R,m) is local and all formal fibers of R areCohen-Macaulay. Then the following statements are equivalent fora finitely generated R–module M.

M ia an equidimensional R–module.

The Cousin complex of M is finite.

M has a u.l.c.a.

Page 73: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some partial characterizations

•••Assume that R is universally catenary and all formal fibres of R areCohen-Macaulay. If M is equidimensional, then CR(M) is finite; inparticular M has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

•••Assume that (R,m) is local and all formal fibers of R areCohen-Macaulay. Then the following statements are equivalent fora finitely generated R–module M.

M ia an equidimensional R–module.

The Cousin complex of M is finite.

M has a u.l.c.a.

Page 74: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some partial characterizations

•••Assume that R is universally catenary and all formal fibres of R areCohen-Macaulay. If M is equidimensional, then CR(M) is finite; inparticular M has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

•••Assume that (R,m) is local and all formal fibers of R areCohen-Macaulay. Then the following statements are equivalent fora finitely generated R–module M.

M ia an equidimensional R–module.

The Cousin complex of M is finite.

M has a u.l.c.a.

Page 75: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some partial characterizations

•••Assume that R is universally catenary and all formal fibres of R areCohen-Macaulay. If M is equidimensional, then CR(M) is finite; inparticular M has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

•••Assume that (R,m) is local and all formal fibers of R areCohen-Macaulay. Then the following statements are equivalent fora finitely generated R–module M.

M ia an equidimensional R–module.

The Cousin complex of M is finite.

M has a u.l.c.a.

Page 76: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Using our approach, we may have the following result which Zhou(2006) has also proved it for M = R.

•••Assume that x is a u.l.c.a of M. Then Mx is a Cohen-MacaulayRx–module.

We may recover, partially, another result of Zhou (2006) over localrings.

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring and x is a u.l.c.a of M, then apower of x is a strong u.l.c.a of M.

Page 77: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Using our approach, we may have the following result which Zhou(2006) has also proved it for M = R.

•••Assume that x is a u.l.c.a of M. Then Mx is a Cohen-MacaulayRx–module.

We may recover, partially, another result of Zhou (2006) over localrings.

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring and x is a u.l.c.a of M, then apower of x is a strong u.l.c.a of M.

Page 78: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Height of an ideal

•••For any finitely generated R–module M and any ideal a of R withaM 6= M, ∏

−1≤i(0 :R H i ) ⊆ 0 :R HhtMa−1

a (M).

Question

Does the inequality∏−1≤i

(0 :R H i ) ⊆ 0 :R HhtMaa (M)

hold?

Page 79: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Height of an ideal

•••For any finitely generated R–module M and any ideal a of R withaM 6= M, ∏

−1≤i(0 :R H i ) ⊆ 0 :R HhtMa−1

a (M).

Question

Does the inequality∏−1≤i

(0 :R H i ) ⊆ 0 :R HhtMaa (M)

hold?

Page 80: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Height of an ideal

•••Assume that M has finite dimension and CR(M) is finite. Then

htMa = inf{r :∏−1≤i

(0 :R HiM) 6⊆ 0 :R Hr

a(M)},

for all ideals a with aM 6= M.

Page 81: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Attached primes of local cohomology

Throughout this section (R,m) is a local ring and M is a finitelygenerated R–module of dimension d .

a(M) =⋂

i<dimM

(0 :R Him(M)).

Page 82: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousincomplexes

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Let t, 0 ≤ t < d , be an integer suchthat dimHi

M ≤ t − i − 1, for all i ≥ −1. Then

Att Htm(M) =

t−1⋃i=−1{p ∈ AssHi

M : dim R/p = t − i − 1}.

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Let l < d be an integer. Thefollowing statements are equivalent.

Hjm(M) = 0 for all j , l < j < d .

dimHiM ≤ l − i − 1 for all i ≥ −1.

Page 83: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousincomplexes

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Let t, 0 ≤ t < d , be an integer suchthat dimHi

M ≤ t − i − 1, for all i ≥ −1. Then

Att Htm(M) =

t−1⋃i=−1{p ∈ AssHi

M : dim R/p = t − i − 1}.

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Let l < d be an integer. Thefollowing statements are equivalent.

Hjm(M) = 0 for all j , l < j < d .

dimHiM ≤ l − i − 1 for all i ≥ −1.

Page 84: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousincomplexes

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Let t, 0 ≤ t < d , be an integer suchthat dimHi

M ≤ t − i − 1, for all i ≥ −1. Then

Att Htm(M) =

t−1⋃i=−1{p ∈ AssHi

M : dim R/p = t − i − 1}.

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Let l < d be an integer. Thefollowing statements are equivalent.

Hjm(M) = 0 for all j , l < j < d .

dimHiM ≤ l − i − 1 for all i ≥ −1.

Page 85: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousincomplexes

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Then

I Att Hd−1m (M) =

⋃d−2i=−1{p ∈ AssHi

M : dim R/p = d − i − 2}.

I Hd−1m (M) 6= 0 if and only if dimHi

M = d − i − 2 for some i ,−1 ≤ i ≤ d − 2.

Page 86: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Attached primes related to cohomologies of Cousincomplexes

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Then

I Att Hd−1m (M) =

⋃d−2i=−1{p ∈ AssHi

M : dim R/p = d − i − 2}.I Hd−1

m (M) 6= 0 if and only if dimHiM = d − i − 2 for some i ,

−1 ≤ i ≤ d − 2.

Page 87: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Dibaei and Yassemi (2005) show that for any ideal a of R,

Att Hda (M) = {p ∈ Supp M : cd (a,R/p) = d},

where cd (a,K ) is the cohomological dimension of an R–module Kwith respect to a, that is cd (a,K ) = sup{i ∈ Z : Hi

a(K ) 6= 0}.

Rem.

Att Hda (M) ⊆ Assh M.

Att Hdm(M) = Assh M (known before)

Page 88: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Dibaei and Yassemi (2005) show that for any ideal a of R,

Att Hda (M) = {p ∈ Supp M : cd (a,R/p) = d},

where cd (a,K ) is the cohomological dimension of an R–module Kwith respect to a, that is cd (a,K ) = sup{i ∈ Z : Hi

a(K ) 6= 0}.

Rem.

Att Hda (M) ⊆ Assh M.

Att Hdm(M) = Assh M (known before)

Page 89: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Dibaei and Yassemi (2005) show that for any ideal a of R,

Att Hda (M) = {p ∈ Supp M : cd (a,R/p) = d},

where cd (a,K ) is the cohomological dimension of an R–module Kwith respect to a, that is cd (a,K ) = sup{i ∈ Z : Hi

a(K ) 6= 0}.

Rem.

Att Hda (M) ⊆ Assh M.

Att Hdm(M) = Assh M (known before)

Page 90: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Dibaei and Yassemi (2005) show that for any ideal a of R,

Att Hda (M) = {p ∈ Supp M : cd (a,R/p) = d},

where cd (a,K ) is the cohomological dimension of an R–module Kwith respect to a, that is cd (a,K ) = sup{i ∈ Z : Hi

a(K ) 6= 0}.

Rem.

Att Hda (M) ⊆ Assh M.

Att Hdm(M) = Assh M (known before)

Page 91: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Dibaei and Yassemi (2005) show that for any ideal a of R,

Att Hda (M) = {p ∈ Supp M : cd (a,R/p) = d},

where cd (a,K ) is the cohomological dimension of an R–module Kwith respect to a, that is cd (a,K ) = sup{i ∈ Z : Hi

a(K ) 6= 0}.

Rem.

Att Hda (M) ⊆ Assh M.

Att Hdm(M) = Assh M (known before)

Page 92: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Dibaei and Yassemi (2007) prove that for any pair of ideals a andb of a complete ring R, if Att Hd

a (M) = Att Hdb (M), then

Hda (M) ∼= Hd

b (M).

Page 93: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Question

For any subset T of Assh M, is there an ideal a of R such thatAtt Hd

a (M) = T ?

Rem.

If dim M = 1, then any subset T of Assh M is equal to the setAtt H1

a(M) for some ideal a of R.

•••Assume that R is complete and T ⊆ Assh M, then there exists anideal a of R such that T = Att Hd

a (M).

Page 94: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Question

For any subset T of Assh M, is there an ideal a of R such thatAtt Hd

a (M) = T ?

Rem.

If dim M = 1, then any subset T of Assh M is equal to the setAtt H1

a(M) for some ideal a of R.

•••Assume that R is complete and T ⊆ Assh M, then there exists anideal a of R such that T = Att Hd

a (M).

Page 95: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

Question

For any subset T of Assh M, is there an ideal a of R such thatAtt Hd

a (M) = T ?

Rem.

If dim M = 1, then any subset T of Assh M is equal to the setAtt H1

a(M) for some ideal a of R.

•••Assume that R is complete and T ⊆ Assh M, then there exists anideal a of R such that T = Att Hd

a (M).

Page 96: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

•••Assume that R is complete. Then the number of non–isomorphictop local cohomology modules of M with respect to all ideals of R

is equal to 2|AsshM|.

Page 97: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

•••Assume that R is complete, d ≥ 1 and setAssh M \ T = {q1, . . . , qr}. The following statements areequivalent.

There exists an ideal a of R such that Att Hda (M) = T .

For each i , 1 ≤ i ≤ r , there exists Qi ∈ Supp M withdim R/Qi = 1 such that⋂

p∈Tp * Qi and qi ⊆ Qi .

With Qi , 1 ≤ i ≤ r , as above, Att Hda (M) = T where a =

r⋂i=1

Qi .

Page 98: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

•••Assume that R is complete, d ≥ 1 and setAssh M \ T = {q1, . . . , qr}. The following statements areequivalent.

There exists an ideal a of R such that Att Hda (M) = T .

For each i , 1 ≤ i ≤ r , there exists Qi ∈ Supp M withdim R/Qi = 1 such that⋂

p∈Tp * Qi and qi ⊆ Qi .

With Qi , 1 ≤ i ≤ r , as above, Att Hda (M) = T where a =

r⋂i=1

Qi .

Page 99: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

•••Assume that R is complete, d ≥ 1 and setAssh M \ T = {q1, . . . , qr}. The following statements areequivalent.

There exists an ideal a of R such that Att Hda (M) = T .

For each i , 1 ≤ i ≤ r , there exists Qi ∈ Supp M withdim R/Qi = 1 such that⋂

p∈Tp * Qi and qi ⊆ Qi .

With Qi , 1 ≤ i ≤ r , as above, Att Hda (M) = T where a =

r⋂i=1

Qi .

Page 100: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Top local cohomology modules

•••Assume that R is complete, d ≥ 1 and setAssh M \ T = {q1, . . . , qr}. The following statements areequivalent.

There exists an ideal a of R such that Att Hda (M) = T .

For each i , 1 ≤ i ≤ r , there exists Qi ∈ Supp M withdim R/Qi = 1 such that⋂

p∈Tp * Qi and qi ⊆ Qi .

With Qi , 1 ≤ i ≤ r , as above, Att Hda (M) = T where a =

r⋂i=1

Qi .

Page 101: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Example

Set R = k[[X ,Y ,Z ,W ]], where k is a field and X ,Y ,Z ,W areindependent indeterminates. Let m = (X ,Y ,Z ,W ),

p1 = (X ,Y ) , p2 = (Z ,W ) , p3 = (Y ,Z ) , p4 = (X ,W )

and set M =R

p1p2p3p4as an R–module, Assh M = {p1, p2, p3, p4}.

We get {pi} = Att H2ai

(M), where

a1 = p2, a2 = p1, a3 = p4, a4 = p3, and {pi , pj} = Att H2aij

(M),where

a12 = (Y 2 + YZ ,Z 2 + YZ ,X 2 + XW ,W 2 + WX ),a34 = (Z 2 + ZW ,X 2 + YX ,Y 2 + YX ,W 2 + WZ ),a13 = (Z 2 + XZ ,W 2 + WY ,X 2 + XZ ),a14 = (W 2 + WY ,Z 2 + ZY ,Y 2 + YW ),a23 = (X 2 + XZ ,Y 2 + WY ,W 2 + ZW ),a24 = (X 2 + XZ ,Y 2 + WY ,Z 2 + ZW ).

Finally, we have {pi , pj , pk} = Att H2aijk

(M), wherea123 = (X ,W ,Y + Z ), a234 = (X ,Y ,W + Z ),a134 = (Z ,W ,Y + X ).

Page 102: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Applications to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

Let (R,m) be a g.CM local ring. Then R/p has a u.l.c.a for allp ∈ Spec R. In particular, any equidimensional R–module M has au.l.c.a.

Page 103: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Applications to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring such that R/p has a u.l.c.a forall p ∈ Spec R. Then the following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and for allp ∈ Supp M \ {m}, Mp is a Cohen-Macaulay Rp–module.

M is a g.CM module.

Cor.Assume that R is an equidimensional noetherian local ring. Thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R is g.CM.

For all p ∈ Spec R \ {m}, Rp is a Cohen-Macaulay ring andR/p has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

Page 104: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Applications to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring such that R/p has a u.l.c.a forall p ∈ Spec R. Then the following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and for allp ∈ Supp M \ {m}, Mp is a Cohen-Macaulay Rp–module.

M is a g.CM module.

Cor.Assume that R is an equidimensional noetherian local ring. Thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R is g.CM.

For all p ∈ Spec R \ {m}, Rp is a Cohen-Macaulay ring andR/p has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

Page 105: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Applications to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring such that R/p has a u.l.c.a forall p ∈ Spec R. Then the following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and for allp ∈ Supp M \ {m}, Mp is a Cohen-Macaulay Rp–module.

M is a g.CM module.

Cor.Assume that R is an equidimensional noetherian local ring. Thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R is g.CM.

For all p ∈ Spec R \ {m}, Rp is a Cohen-Macaulay ring andR/p has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

Page 106: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Applications to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring such that R/p has a u.l.c.a forall p ∈ Spec R. Then the following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and for allp ∈ Supp M \ {m}, Mp is a Cohen-Macaulay Rp–module.

M is a g.CM module.

Cor.Assume that R is an equidimensional noetherian local ring. Thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R is g.CM.

For all p ∈ Spec R \ {m}, Rp is a Cohen-Macaulay ring andR/p has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

Page 107: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Applications to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

•••Assume that (R,m) is a local ring such that R/p has a u.l.c.a forall p ∈ Spec R. Then the following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and for allp ∈ Supp M \ {m}, Mp is a Cohen-Macaulay Rp–module.

M is a g.CM module.

Cor.Assume that R is an equidimensional noetherian local ring. Thefollowing statements are equivalent.

R is g.CM.

For all p ∈ Spec R \ {m}, Rp is a Cohen-Macaulay ring andR/p has a uniform local cohomological annihilator.

Page 108: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Applications to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

•••Assume that (R,m) is local.

I A finitely generated R–module M is g.CM if and only if allcohomology modules of CR(M) are of finite lengths.

I A finitely generated R–module M is quasi–Buchsbaummodule if and only if CR(M) is finite and mHi

M = 0 for all i .

Page 109: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Applications to generalized Cohen-Macaulay modules

•••Assume that (R,m) is local.

I A finitely generated R–module M is g.CM if and only if allcohomology modules of CR(M) are of finite lengths.

I A finitely generated R–module M is quasi–Buchsbaummodule if and only if CR(M) is finite and mHi

M = 0 for all i .

Page 110: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

gCM

CM

Page 111: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohen-Macaulay locus

Throughout M is a finitely generated module of finite dimension dover a noetherian ring A. The Cohen-Macaulay locus of M isdenoted by

CM(M) := {p ∈ Spec A : Mp is Cohen-Macaulay as Ap–module}.

The topological property of the Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules isan important tool and have been studied by many authors.

Page 112: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohen-Macaulay locus

Throughout M is a finitely generated module of finite dimension dover a noetherian ring A. The Cohen-Macaulay locus of M isdenoted by

CM(M) := {p ∈ Spec A : Mp is Cohen-Macaulay as Ap–module}.

The topological property of the Cohen-Macaulay loci of modules isan important tool and have been studied by many authors.

Page 113: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohen-Macaulay locus

Grothendieck (1965) states that CM(M) is an open subset ofSpec R whenever R is an excellent ring.

Grothendieck (1966) shows that CM(R) is open when R possessesa dualizing complex.

Dibaei (2005) shows that CM(R) is open when R is a local ring,all of its formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay and satisfying the Serrecondition (S2), the condition which is superfluous.

Page 114: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohen-Macaulay locus

Grothendieck (1965) states that CM(M) is an open subset ofSpec R whenever R is an excellent ring.

Grothendieck (1966) shows that CM(R) is open when R possessesa dualizing complex.

Dibaei (2005) shows that CM(R) is open when R is a local ring,all of its formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay and satisfying the Serrecondition (S2), the condition which is superfluous.

Page 115: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohen-Macaulay locus

Grothendieck (1965) states that CM(M) is an open subset ofSpec R whenever R is an excellent ring.

Grothendieck (1966) shows that CM(R) is open when R possessesa dualizing complex.

Dibaei (2005) shows that CM(R) is open when R is a local ring,all of its formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay and satisfying the Serrecondition (S2), the condition which is superfluous.

Page 116: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rotthaus and Sega (2006) study the Cohen-Macaulay loci ofgraded modules over a noetherian homogeneous graded ringR =

⊕i∈N Ri considered as R0–modules.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that when the ring R is catenary, theopenness of CM(B) of any finite R–algebra B is a crucialassumption if one expects all equidimensional finite R–module Mhave finite Cousin complexes.

Page 117: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rotthaus and Sega (2006) study the Cohen-Macaulay loci ofgraded modules over a noetherian homogeneous graded ringR =

⊕i∈N Ri considered as R0–modules.

Kawasaki (2008) shows that when the ring R is catenary, theopenness of CM(B) of any finite R–algebra B is a crucialassumption if one expects all equidimensional finite R–module Mhave finite Cousin complexes.

Page 118: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rem.

CM(M) = Spec R \ ∪i≥−1Supp R(Hi (CR(M))).

Rem.

If CR(M) is finite, then non-CM(M) = V(∏i

(0 :R HiM)) so that

CM(M) is a Zariski–open subsets of Spec R.

Page 119: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rem.

CM(M) = Spec R \ ∪i≥−1Supp R(Hi (CR(M))).

Rem.

If CR(M) is finite, then non-CM(M) = V(∏i

(0 :R HiM)) so that

CM(M) is a Zariski–open subsets of Spec R.

Page 120: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rem.

Assume that all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Then theCohen-Macaulay locus of M is a Zariski–open subset of Spec R.

•••Assume that (R,m) is a catenary local ring and that M isequidimensional R–module. Then

Min (non–CM(M)) ⊆ ∪0≤i≤dimM

Att Him(M)∪non–CM(R).

Cor.Assume that (R,m) is a catenary local ring and that thenon–CM(R) is a finite set. Then the Cohen-Macaulay locus of Mis open.

Page 121: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rem.

Assume that all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Then theCohen-Macaulay locus of M is a Zariski–open subset of Spec R.

•••Assume that (R,m) is a catenary local ring and that M isequidimensional R–module. Then

Min (non–CM(M)) ⊆ ∪0≤i≤dimM

Att Him(M)∪non–CM(R).

Cor.Assume that (R,m) is a catenary local ring and that thenon–CM(R) is a finite set. Then the Cohen-Macaulay locus of Mis open.

Page 122: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rem.

Assume that all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Then theCohen-Macaulay locus of M is a Zariski–open subset of Spec R.

•••Assume that (R,m) is a catenary local ring and that M isequidimensional R–module. Then

Min (non–CM(M)) ⊆ ∪0≤i≤dimM

Att Him(M)∪non–CM(R).

Cor.Assume that (R,m) is a catenary local ring and that thenon–CM(R) is a finite set. Then the Cohen-Macaulay locus of Mis open.

Page 123: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus

Example

Consider a local ring R satisfying Serre’s condition (Sd−2) suchthat CR(R) is finite.

Then HiR = 0 for i ≤ d − 4 and i ≥ d − 1, dimHd−3

R ≤ 1 and

dimHd−2R ≤ 0.

Thus non–CM(R) = SuppHd−2R ∪ SuppHd−1

R is a finite set.

Page 124: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Openness of Cohen-Macaulay locus

Example

Set S = k[[X ,Y ,Z ,U,V ]]/(X ) ∩ (Y ,Z ), where k is a field. It isclear that S is a local ring with Cohen-Macaulay formal fibres. ByRatliff’s weak existence theorem, there are infinitely many primeideals P of k[[X ,Y ,Z ,U,V ]], with(X ,Y ,Z ) ⊂ P ⊂ (X ,Y ,Z ,U,V ). For any such prime ideal P, SPis not equidimensional and so it is not Cohen-Macaulay. In otherwords, non–CM(S) is infinite.

Page 125: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Example

Ferrand and Raynaud (1970) show that there exists a local integraldomain (R,m) of dimension 2 such thatR = C[[X ,Y ,Z ]]/(Z 2, tZ ), where C is the field of complexnumbers and t = X + Y + Y 2s for some s ∈ C[[Y ]] \ C{Y }.As Ass R = {(Z ), (Z , t)}, R does not satisfy (S1). Thus H−1

R6= 0

while H−1R = 0. Now by a result of Petzl (1997), there exists aformal fibre of R which is not Cohen-Macaulay.As R is an integral local domain, we have non–CM(R) = {m}.

Page 126: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and all formal fibres of Rover minimal members of Supp M are Cohen-Macaulay.

M has a u.l.c.a.

Cor.Assume that p is a prime ideal of Spec R such that R/p has au.l.c.a. Then the formal fibre of R over p is Cohen-Macaulay.

Page 127: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and all formal fibres of Rover minimal members of Supp M are Cohen-Macaulay.

M has a u.l.c.a.

Cor.Assume that p is a prime ideal of Spec R such that R/p has au.l.c.a. Then the formal fibre of R over p is Cohen-Macaulay.

Page 128: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and all formal fibres of Rover minimal members of Supp M are Cohen-Macaulay.

M has a u.l.c.a.

Cor.Assume that p is a prime ideal of Spec R such that R/p has au.l.c.a. Then the formal fibre of R over p is Cohen-Macaulay.

Page 129: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

M is equidimensional R–module and all formal fibres of Rover minimal members of Supp M are Cohen-Macaulay.

M has a u.l.c.a.

Cor.Assume that p is a prime ideal of Spec R such that R/p has au.l.c.a. Then the formal fibre of R over p is Cohen-Macaulay.

Page 130: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

R is universally catenary ring and all of its formal fibres areCohen-Macaulay.

The Cousin complex CR(R/p) is finite for all p ∈ Spec R.

R/p has a u.l.c.a for all p ∈ Spec R.

Schenzel (1982) proves that the equality holds when M isequidimensional and R posses a dualizing complex.

Rem.

If a local R posses a dualizing complex, then it is a homomorphicimage of a Gorenstein local ring and so R is universally catenaryand all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Hence CR(M) isfinite for all equidimensional R–module M.

Page 131: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

R is universally catenary ring and all of its formal fibres areCohen-Macaulay.

The Cousin complex CR(R/p) is finite for all p ∈ Spec R.

R/p has a u.l.c.a for all p ∈ Spec R.

Schenzel (1982) proves that the equality holds when M isequidimensional and R posses a dualizing complex.

Rem.

If a local R posses a dualizing complex, then it is a homomorphicimage of a Gorenstein local ring and so R is universally catenaryand all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Hence CR(M) isfinite for all equidimensional R–module M.

Page 132: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

R is universally catenary ring and all of its formal fibres areCohen-Macaulay.

The Cousin complex CR(R/p) is finite for all p ∈ Spec R.

R/p has a u.l.c.a for all p ∈ Spec R.

Schenzel (1982) proves that the equality holds when M isequidimensional and R posses a dualizing complex.

Rem.

If a local R posses a dualizing complex, then it is a homomorphicimage of a Gorenstein local ring and so R is universally catenaryand all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Hence CR(M) isfinite for all equidimensional R–module M.

Page 133: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

R is universally catenary ring and all of its formal fibres areCohen-Macaulay.

The Cousin complex CR(R/p) is finite for all p ∈ Spec R.

R/p has a u.l.c.a for all p ∈ Spec R.

Schenzel (1982) proves that the equality holds when M isequidimensional and R posses a dualizing complex.

Rem.

If a local R posses a dualizing complex, then it is a homomorphicimage of a Gorenstein local ring and so R is universally catenaryand all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Hence CR(M) isfinite for all equidimensional R–module M.

Page 134: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

R is universally catenary ring and all of its formal fibres areCohen-Macaulay.

The Cousin complex CR(R/p) is finite for all p ∈ Spec R.

R/p has a u.l.c.a for all p ∈ Spec R.

Schenzel (1982) proves that the equality holds when M isequidimensional and R posses a dualizing complex.

Rem.

If a local R posses a dualizing complex, then it is a homomorphicimage of a Gorenstein local ring and so R is universally catenaryand all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Hence CR(M) isfinite for all equidimensional R–module M.

Page 135: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••The following statements are equivalent.

R is universally catenary ring and all of its formal fibres areCohen-Macaulay.

The Cousin complex CR(R/p) is finite for all p ∈ Spec R.

R/p has a u.l.c.a for all p ∈ Spec R.

Schenzel (1982) proves that the equality holds when M isequidimensional and R posses a dualizing complex.

Rem.

If a local R posses a dualizing complex, then it is a homomorphicimage of a Gorenstein local ring and so R is universally catenaryand all formal fibres of R are Cohen-Macaulay. Hence CR(M) isfinite for all equidimensional R–module M.

Page 136: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••Assume that CR(M) is finite. Then

V(∏d−1

i=−1(0 :R HiM)) =non–CM(M) = V(a(M)).

Page 137: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••For an equidimensional R–module M, the following statements areequivalent.

R/q has a u.l.c.a for all q ∈ CM(M).

R/qR is equidimensional R–module and the formal fibre ring(Rq/qRq)⊗R R is Cohen-Macaulay for all q ∈ CM(M).

non–CM(M) = V(a(M)).

non–CM(M) ⊇ V(a(M)).

Page 138: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••For an equidimensional R–module M, the following statements areequivalent.

R/q has a u.l.c.a for all q ∈ CM(M).

R/qR is equidimensional R–module and the formal fibre ring(Rq/qRq)⊗R R is Cohen-Macaulay for all q ∈ CM(M).

non–CM(M) = V(a(M)).

non–CM(M) ⊇ V(a(M)).

Page 139: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••For an equidimensional R–module M, the following statements areequivalent.

R/q has a u.l.c.a for all q ∈ CM(M).

R/qR is equidimensional R–module and the formal fibre ring(Rq/qRq)⊗R R is Cohen-Macaulay for all q ∈ CM(M).

non–CM(M) = V(a(M)).

non–CM(M) ⊇ V(a(M)).

Page 140: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••For an equidimensional R–module M, the following statements areequivalent.

R/q has a u.l.c.a for all q ∈ CM(M).

R/qR is equidimensional R–module and the formal fibre ring(Rq/qRq)⊗R R is Cohen-Macaulay for all q ∈ CM(M).

non–CM(M) = V(a(M)).

non–CM(M) ⊇ V(a(M)).

Page 141: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••Assume that p ∈ Spec R. A necessary and sufficient condition forR/p to have a u.l.c.a. is that there exists an equidimensionalR–module M such that p ∈ Supp M \ V(a(M)).

Cor.Assume that M satisfies the condition (Sn). If CR(M) is finite,then the formal fibres of R over all prime ideals p ∈ Supp M withhtMp ≤ n are Cohen-Macaulay

Page 142: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

•••Assume that p ∈ Spec R. A necessary and sufficient condition forR/p to have a u.l.c.a. is that there exists an equidimensionalR–module M such that p ∈ Supp M \ V(a(M)).

Cor.Assume that M satisfies the condition (Sn). If CR(M) is finite,then the formal fibres of R over all prime ideals p ∈ Supp M withhtMp ≤ n are Cohen-Macaulay

Page 143: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

Cor.Assume that CR(M) is finite. Then the formal fibres of R over allprime ideals p ∈ Supp M with htMp ≤ 1 are Cohen-Macaulay.

Page 144: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Rings whose formal fibres are Cohen-Macaulay

Cor.Assume that CR(M) is finite. Then the formal fibres of R over allprime ideals p ∈ CM(M) ∪ {p ∈ Supp M : htMp = 1} areCohen-Macaulay.

Page 145: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

gCM

CM

Formal fibres over minimal

primes are CM

Formal fibres over primes of CM locus are

CM

All formal fibres are

CM

Page 146: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

gCM

CM

If all formal fibres of the base ring are CM

Page 147: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some comments

Question

Assume that CR(M) is finite. Are the formal fibres of R over allprime ideals p ∈ Supp M, Cohen-Macaulay?

Page 148: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some comments

Cor.Assume that CR(M) is finite and dim M ≤ 3. Then the formalfibres of R over all prime ideals p ∈ Supp M are Cohen-Macaulay.

Cor.Assume that CR(M) is finite and dim (non–CM(M)) ≤ 1. Then theformal fibres of R over all prime ideals p ∈ Supp M areCohen-Macaulay.

dim (non–CM(M)) = sup{dim R/p : p ∈ non–CM(M)}.

Page 149: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some comments

Cor.Assume that CR(M) is finite and dim M ≤ 3. Then the formalfibres of R over all prime ideals p ∈ Supp M are Cohen-Macaulay.

Cor.Assume that CR(M) is finite and dim (non–CM(M)) ≤ 1. Then theformal fibres of R over all prime ideals p ∈ Supp M areCohen-Macaulay.

dim (non–CM(M)) = sup{dim R/p : p ∈ non–CM(M)}.

Page 150: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some comments

Problem

Assume that CR(M) is finite and x is a non–zero–divisor on M.Then CR(M/xM) is finite.

Rem.

Solving the above problem is equivalent to find a positive answerfor our question.

Question

Assume that CR(M) is finite. Are the formal fibres of R over allprime ideals p ∈ Supp M, Cohen-Macaulay?

THE END

Page 151: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some comments

Problem

Assume that CR(M) is finite and x is a non–zero–divisor on M.Then CR(M/xM) is finite.

Rem.

Solving the above problem is equivalent to find a positive answerfor our question.

Question

Assume that CR(M) is finite. Are the formal fibres of R over allprime ideals p ∈ Supp M, Cohen-Macaulay?

THE END

Page 152: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some comments

Problem

Assume that CR(M) is finite and x is a non–zero–divisor on M.Then CR(M/xM) is finite.

Rem.

Solving the above problem is equivalent to find a positive answerfor our question.

Question

Assume that CR(M) is finite. Are the formal fibres of R over allprime ideals p ∈ Supp M, Cohen-Macaulay?

THE END

Page 153: Cousin complexes with applications to local cohomology and

Finite Cousin complexes Attached primes of local cohomology Cohen-Macaulay locus

Some comments

Problem

Assume that CR(M) is finite and x is a non–zero–divisor on M.Then CR(M/xM) is finite.

Rem.

Solving the above problem is equivalent to find a positive answerfor our question.

Question

Assume that CR(M) is finite. Are the formal fibres of R over allprime ideals p ∈ Supp M, Cohen-Macaulay?

THE END