COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 900 I 2-27 I 3 ANDREA SHERIDAN ORDIN County Counsel June 2, 2011 TELEPHONE (213) 974-1801 FACSIMILE (213) 626-7446 TDD (213) 633-0901 TO: SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARY REVIEW COMMITTEE FROM: NANCYM. TAKADE Principal County Counsel RE: June 8, 2011 BRCMeeting - Agenda Item No.6: Consideration of Plan Bl - Minority Empowerment To assist the Committee in its review of proposed redistricting plans, the following is a sumary of the proposed Plan B1 - Minority Empowerment submitted by Alan Chan. 1. Plan Summary: This plan proposes to reassign 430 redistricting units (RDUs) which makes up 48 whole or parial communities. The moves of these areas are sumarized on page 5, and are further detailed on pages 10-16 of the Report on Proposed Redistricting Plan - B 1. The relevant summar page (Page 5) is included here as Attachment 1. 2. Population Deviation: The total population deviation in the proposed plan is 1.32%. 3. Number of People Moved: This plan reassigns 1,454,997 people among the five districts. The total population moved to and from each district, is sumarized on page 9 of the Report on Proposed Redistricting Plan- B1. The relevant page is included here as Attachment 2. 4. Deferred/Advanced Voting: County supervisors are elected to staggered four-year terms. The First and Third Districts elect supervisors at each general election at which the Governor is to be elected (i.e. 2010,2014,2018). The Second, Fourth and Fifth Districts elect supervisors at each election which the President appears on the ballot (i.e. 2008,2012,2016, etc.). Countyide, 14.6% of constituents in the County wil be affected by deferral or advancement under this proposed plan. A table containing deferral HOA.797297.1
13
Embed
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELESfile.lacounty.gov/SDSInter/bos/supdocs/61425.pdf · county of los angeles office of the county counsel 648 kenneth hahn hall of administration 500 west temple
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELESOFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION
500 WEST TEMPLE STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 900 I 2-27 I 3
ANDREA SHERIDAN ORDINCounty Counsel June 2, 2011
TELEPHONE
(213) 974-1801
FACSIMILE
(213) 626-7446
TDD
(213) 633-0901
TO: SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARYREVIEW COMMITTEE
FROM: NANCYM. TAKADEPrincipal County Counsel
RE: June 8, 2011 BRCMeeting - Agenda Item No.6:Consideration of Plan Bl - Minority Empowerment
To assist the Committee in its review of proposed redistrictingplans, the following is a sumary of the proposed Plan B1 - MinorityEmpowerment submitted by Alan Chan.
1. Plan Summary: This plan proposes to reassign 430redistricting units (RDUs) which makes up 48 whole or parial communities. Themoves of these areas are sumarized on page 5, and are further detailed on pages10-16 of the Report on Proposed Redistricting Plan - B 1. The relevant summarpage (Page 5) is included here as Attachment 1.
2. Population Deviation: The total population deviation in
the proposed plan is 1.32%.
3. Number of People Moved: This plan reassigns 1,454,997people among the five districts. The total population moved to and from eachdistrict, is sumarized on page 9 of the Report on Proposed Redistricting Plan-B1. The relevant page is included here as Attachment 2.
4. Deferred/Advanced Voting: County supervisors are
elected to staggered four-year terms. The First and Third Districts electsupervisors at each general election at which the Governor is to be elected (i.e.2010,2014,2018). The Second, Fourth and Fifth Districts elect supervisors ateach election which the President appears on the ballot (i.e. 2008,2012,2016,etc.). Countyide, 14.6% of constituents in the County wil be affected bydeferral or advancement under this proposed plan. A table containing deferral
HOA.797297.1
-2-
and advancement information is included here as Attachment 3 and issumarized below.
Advancement
Voters who wil be reassigned from the First and Third Districtsinto the Second, Fourh or Fifth Districts as a result of this proposed plan, wilhave an opportity to vote for a County supervisor twice in four (4) years (2010,2012), thus advancing their right to vote for a supervisor.
In the Benchmark First District, 670,087 constituents wil bereassigned to either the Second, Fourh or Fifth Districts. As a result of thisproposed plan, 35.4% of all constituents, 32.9% of the citizen voting agepopulation (CV AP), and 34.4% of registered voters in the Benchmark FirstDistrict are advanced.
In the Benchmark Third District, 10,623 constituents wil bereassigned to either the Second, Fourth or Fift Districts. As a result of thisproposed plan, 0.5% of all constituents, 0.5% of the CV AP, and 0.4% ofregistered voters in the Benchmark Third District are advanced.
Deferment
V oters who wil be reassigned from the Second, Fourh and FifthDistricts into the First and Third Districts, wil not have the opportity to votefor a County supervisor until 2014. For those reassigned voters, six (6) years wilhave passed since they last had the opportity to vote for a supervisor.
In the Benchmark Second District, 243,580 constituents wil bereassigned to either the First or Third Districts. As.a result of this proposed plan,12.5% of all constituents, 11.1 % of the CV AP, and 10.3% of registered voters in
the Benchmark Second District are deferred.
In the Benchmark Fourh District, 158,374 constituents wil bereassigned to either the First or Third Districts. As a result of this proposed plan,8.2% of all constituents, 8.5% of the CV AP, and 8.6% of registered voters in theBenchmark Fourh District are deferred.
In the Benchmark Fifth District, 347,882 constituents wil bereassigned to either the First or Third Districts. As a result of this proposed plan,16.7% of all constituents, 16.3% of the CV AP, and 16.3% of registered voters in
the Benchmark Fifth District are deferred.
5. Citizen Voting Age Population (CV AP): The CV AP
information per district is sumarized on page 30 of the Report on ProposedRedistricting Plan - B1. The relevant page is included here as Attachment 4.
HOA. 797297.1
-3-
6. Incumbency: This plan does not displace any supervisorfrom his/her district.
7. Contiguity/Compactness: All five supervisorial districtsare contiguous and are reasonably compact.
8. City/Community Splits: The following
cities/communities that are newly split as a result of this plan are:
City/Community District Splits
None None
9. City/Community Unified: The following
cities/communities that are now unified in one district as a result of this plan are:
City/Community Joined in Which DistrictAzusa 5Pico Rivera 4LA City - Downtown 1LA City - East Hollywood 3LA City - Hancock Park 3LA City - Lake View Terrace 5LA City - Miracle Mile 1LA City - South Park 2LA City - Sylmar 3LA City - Venice 3UGty-W~~ 1LA County - Claremont 5LA County - EI Monte 1LA County - Florence/Firestone 2LA County - Hacienda Heights 1LA County - Rowland Heights 1LA County - South Whittier 4LA County - West Whittier/Los Nietos 4. LA County - Whittier 4
10. Major Facilties Moved: This plan moves major faciltiesout of their curent districts. The facilties that are moved are: