Top Banner
1 Cotton 2005 Ouachita Fertilizer Central
33

Cotton 2005

Jan 11, 2016

Download

Documents

Kane

Cotton 2005. Ouachita Fertilizer. Central. Ouachita Commitment to you. Increase yields Lower Costs / Unit Produced Help solve specific production problems that limit profitability Value Offering Consistency and Reliability Cost effectiveness Leveraged Investment. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Cotton 2005

1

Cotton 2005

Ouachita Fertilizer

Central

Page 2: Cotton 2005

2

Ouachita Commitment to you

• Increase yields• Lower Costs / Unit Produced• Help solve specific production

problems that limit profitability Value Offering• Consistency and Reliability• Cost effectiveness• Leveraged Investment

Page 3: Cotton 2005

3

Delta Smart Systems

What is DSS?

• A precise data-gathering system collected to improve grower profitability

• Records production practices used on the farm

• Uses on-board computers to capture yield data

• Uses USDA grading standards to measure impact on quality

• Utilizes a large data base Community to analyze data

• Confidential

Page 4: Cotton 2005

4

Delta Smart Systems

What is DSS?• More than just a database

• Ties together all production data with local weather station data

• Ties together all production data with field observations and samples

Page 5: Cotton 2005

5

Ouachita Fertilizer’s method of introducing the new science of crop phenology

Translation: Understanding how weather impacts crop production practices

Delta Smart Systems

Page 6: Cotton 2005

6

Delta Smart Systems

• Utilizes technology to reach higher yields and lower grower’s cost per unit

• Increases crop uniformity, the key to higher yields

• Helps predict Quality grades for targeted markets

• Helps avoid repeated mistakes: continuous improvement

Page 7: Cotton 2005

7

Cotton Acres in Louisiana

710

870

520 525 500

0

200

400

600

800

1000

000 a

cres

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

From 2002 to 2003, about 34% of all cotton acres were irrigated. (USDA)

Page 8: Cotton 2005

8

Cotton Yields: Lbs. Per Acre

629580

717

967867

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Lbs.

per

Acr

e

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Page 9: Cotton 2005

9

Regional Analysis

• Split DSS data into three regions•To customize recommendations

•To provide local solutions• Identify and remove limiting

factors to yield and quality

Page 10: Cotton 2005

10

DSS in 2004

• 15,000 acres in 2004• 50 plant tissue samples• 250 field observations• Two satellite weather stations

Page 11: Cotton 2005

11

Plant Analysis

• Tool for in-season use to determine and manage plant nutrient levels and ratios

• Some elements can be corrected in-season with Foliar Applications

Page 12: Cotton 2005

12

Value Offering

• Enables growers to identify nutrients that limit yields or quality: improve plant health

• Allows deficiencies or imbalances to be corrected in-season to increase profits.

• Helps avoid the application of excessive rates and unnecessary nutrient applications are avoided.

Page 13: Cotton 2005

13

Disease Protection*

• Balanced nutrients have proven to reduce disease pressure in cotton:• Verticillium

• Pythium, fusarium, root rot and nematodes

*Management of Diseases with Macro- and Microelements, APS Press, 1993

Page 14: Cotton 2005

14

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

N S P K Mg Ca B Zn Mn Cu

Central

Early Bloom Plant Tissue Average

Cotton Plant Analysis 2004

Page 15: Cotton 2005

15

Early Bloom Plant Tissue

• Central: 23 samples•49% low in P•50% low or deficient in K•52% low or deficient in Zn•35% low in sulfur

Page 16: Cotton 2005

16

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

N S P K Mg Ca B Zn Mn Cu

Central

Late Bloom Plant Tissue

Cotton Plant Analysis 2004

Page 17: Cotton 2005

17

Late Bloom Plant Tissue

• Central: 29 samples• 52% low or deficient in K• 55% had K/Mn ratios out of Balance;

this means the K levels are too lowThe expected ratio is 300 ppmK to

1ppm Mn.Our average was 156 ppm K to 1ppm

Mn.

Page 18: Cotton 2005

18

DSS in 2004: Central

• Plant tissue samples showed that 50% or more of the samples tested low in K.

• In our Community 80 lbs/A of K improved cotton yields by 100 lbs/A in 2004.

• An investment of $20.00 in Potassium returned $50.00

600

700

800

900

1000

80 lbs K 0# K

Page 19: Cotton 2005

19

DSS in 2004: Central

Other Results from our Community:

Phosphate: 45 lbs./ A yields 120lbs. more cotton than 0 lbs.

An investment of $15.00 in Phosphate returned $60.00 in income 800

850

900

950

1000

45 lbs. P 0 lbs. P

Page 20: Cotton 2005

20

DSS in 2004: Central

Sulfur in our Community

• 10 lbs. /A of sulfur increased cotton weight by 188lbs./acre.

• An investment of $6.00 in Sulfur returned $90.00

600

700

800

900

1000

10 lbs. S 0 lbs S

Page 21: Cotton 2005

21

Sulfur on Cotton

• Required on sandy soils or soils with low organic matter

• Sulfur deficiencies look much like nitrogen deficiencies, pale-green leaves on the upper part of the plant.

• Sulfur deficiency appears on new growth

Page 22: Cotton 2005

22

DSS in 2004: Central

• Zinc: The single largest increase in yield with one management change was the 90 lb. increase with 2 lbs. of zinc per acre.

• An investment of $1.30 in Zinc returned $45.00

600

700

800

900

1000

2 lbs. Zinc 0 lbs Zinc

Page 23: Cotton 2005

23

Zinc Problems in Cotton

• Laser leveling, high copper, iron and manganese concentrations

• Highly alkaline soils

• Low VAM* levels • Cool wet periods

which affect root movement *VAM-Vascular Microorganisms

Page 24: Cotton 2005

24

Plant Tissue Summary

• Explains good responses to Zn, K, S and P in Central.

Early Bloom: % Sample TestingLow or Deficient

Central

P 49%

K 50%

S 35%

Zn 52%

Page 25: Cotton 2005

25

Plant Tissue Summary

• Potash levels are a problem in the Central area.

Central

Late Bloom: % SamplesTesting Low or Deficient

K 52%

Page 26: Cotton 2005

26

Cotton Fertility 2005

N 80

P 45

K 80

S 10

B 1.5

Zn 2

Central (lbs. / acre)

Banded Application

Page 27: Cotton 2005

27

Results from DSS: Central

Varieties: top three varieties• Paymaster 1218 BGRR• Sure Grow 215BGRR• DP 449 BGRR

IST• Gaucho and Cruiser were equal

Other Varieties that did well in other Regions of the State were: *DPL 5415 RR *DPL 555 BGRR *Stoneville 55999 BGRR

Page 28: Cotton 2005

28

Planting Date 2004: Central

• Plant when weather accumulates 25 GDU the five days after planting. (forecasts)

Page 29: Cotton 2005

29

Need 25 heat units cumulative within five days after planting to plant cotton.

GDUs Accumulation D. Lee 2004

Planting Date 2004: Central

Date

GDUs

0

20

40

60

80

4/9/

2005

4/10

/200

5

4/11

/200

5

4/12

/200

5

4/13

/200

5

4/14

/200

5

4/15

/200

5

4/16

/200

5

4/17

/200

5

4/18

/200

5

4/19

/200

5

4/20

/200

5

GDU’s

Page 30: Cotton 2005

30

Results from DSS: Central

Population•40,000 planted seeds per acre

gave the highest yields in this Region.

•For all of Louisiana 45,000 planted seed gave the highest yield.

Page 31: Cotton 2005

31

DSS Summary

• 15,000 acres in 2004• 60 plant tissue samples• 250 field observations• Two satellite weather stations• DSS split LA cotton into three

distinct areas to better understand profitable cotton production

Page 32: Cotton 2005

32

DSS Summary

• Cotton seeding rates performed best at 40,000 seeds per acre in 2004.

• Using weather stations to forecast 25 GDU accumulations the first five days after planting is an effective tool to use as a planting guide.

• We have weather stations running now and can have the information sent to you.

Page 33: Cotton 2005

33

Cotton Schedule of Events