7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
1/18
COST FORECASTING FOR VARIOUSTECHNOLOGY POWER PLANT UPTO 2050-
NREL REPORTHTTP://BV.COM/DOC/REPORTS-STUDIES/NREL-COST-REPORT.PDF
Presented by
Rakesh kharra(63)
http://bv.com/doc/reports-studies/nrel-cost-report.pdfhttp://bv.com/doc/reports-studies/nrel-cost-report.pdfhttp://bv.com/doc/reports-studies/nrel-cost-report.pdfhttp://bv.com/doc/reports-studies/nrel-cost-report.pdfhttp://bv.com/doc/reports-studies/nrel-cost-report.pdfhttp://bv.com/doc/reports-studies/nrel-cost-report.pdfhttp://bv.com/doc/reports-studies/nrel-cost-report.pdfhttp://bv.com/doc/reports-studies/nrel-cost-report.pdf7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
2/18
NREL NRELNational Renewable Energy Laboratory is the U.S.
Department of Energy's primary national laboratory for renewableenergy and energy efficiency research and development.
NRELs emphasis is on a comprehensive energy approach that
encompasses the relationship among key systems:
Fuel production
Transportation
The built environment
Electricity generation and delivery.
NREL develops renewable energy and energyefficiency technologies and practices, advance relatedscience and engineering, and transfer knowledge and innovations
to address the nation's energy and environmental goals.
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
3/18
INTRODUCTION
power generating technology cost and performance estimates that
are described in this report.
site specific items such as labor rates, indoor versus outdoor plant, water
supply, access roads, labor camps, permitting and licensing, or laydown areas
owner specific items such as sales taxes, financing costs, or legal costs.
It is not possible to reasonably forecast whetherfuture commodity prices will increase, decrease, or remain the same. Although thecosts in 2009 are much higher than earlier in the decade, for modelingpurposes, the costs presented here do not anticipate dramatic increases or decreases in basic commodity prices through 2050.
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
4/18
COST CATEGORIES
paidup royalty allowance,
preproduction costs,
inventory capital and
land costs.
Spare parts and plant equipment
Utility interconnections
Project
Owners project management
Taxes/ins/advisory fees/legal
Financing
Plant startup/construction support
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
5/18
CAPITAL COST BREAKDOWN FOR ANUCLEAR POWER PLANT-Conventional
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
6/18
CAPITAL COST BREAKDOWN FOR APULVERIZED COAL FIRED POWER PLANT
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
7/18
COST ESTIMATES AND PERFORMANCE DATAFOR RENEWABL EELECTRICITYTECHNOLOGIES
Biopower Technologies
Geothermal Energy Technologies
Hydropower Technologies
Ocean Energy Technologies
Solar Energy Technologies
Wind Energy Technologies
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
8/18
CAPITAL COST BREAKDOWN FOR A TROUGHCONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER PLANT WITHSTORAG
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
9/18
Capital cost breakdown for an onshore windpower plant
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
10/18
Cost and Performance Projection for a
Compressed Air Energy Storage Plant (262 MW)
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
11/18
PUMPED STORAGE HYDROPOWERTECHNOLOGY
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
12/18
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
13/18
BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE TECHNOLOGY
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
14/18
Capital Cost Breakdown for a
Battery Energy Storage Plant
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
15/18
ASSUMPTIONS
1.
Unless otherwise noted in the text, costs are presented in 2009 doll
ars.
2.Unless otherwise noted in the text, the estimates were based on o
n
site construction in the Midwestern United States. 3.Plants were assumed to be constructed on greenfield sites. The
sites were assumed to be reasonably level and clear, with no hazar
dous materials, no standing timber, no wetlands, and no endangere
d species.
4.Budgetary quotations were not requested for this activity. Values fro
m the Black &Veatch
proprietary database of estimate templates were used.
5.The concept screening level cost estimates were developed base
d on experience and estimating factors. The estimates reflect an ov
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
16/18
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
17/18
13.Water was assumed to be available at the plant fence with a pipelin
e connection.
14.The estimates included an administration/control building.
15.The estimates were based on 2009 costs; therefore, escalation wasnot included.
16.Direct estimated costs included the purchase of major equipment, b
alanceofplant (BOP) equipment and materials, erection labor, and
all contractor services forfurnish and erect subcontract items.
17.Spare parts for startup and commissioning were included in the ow
ners costs.
18.Construction personhours were based on a 50hour workweek usin
g merit/open shop craftspersons.
19.The composite crew labor rate was for the Midwestern states. Ratesincluded payroll and payroll taxes and benefits.
20.Project management, engineering, procurement, quality control, and
related services were included in the engineering services.
7/31/2019 Cost Forecasting for Various Technology Power Plant Upto
18/18