Republic of the Philippines DOTC*MMDA*DPWH*NEDA*PNP-NCR*HUDCC*UP-NCTS*EMB Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 C COST E ESTIMATION AND D DESIGN C CRITERIA March 1999 MMUTIS STUDY TEAM m m m m u u t t i i s s No. SSF JR 99-036 (14/16) .
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Republic of the Philippines DOTC*MMDA*DPWH*NEDA*PNP-NCR*HUDCC*UP-NCTS*EMB Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
STRUCTURAL DESIGN CODES AND STANDARD............................................. 3-11
3.1 General ............................................................................................................... 3-113.2 Loading Specifications....................................................................................... 3-11
3.2.1 Dead Loads............................................................................................. 3-113.2.2 Standard Truck and Lane Loads.............................................................3-123.2.3 Impact Load............................................................................................3-133.2.4 Longitudinal Forces................................................................................3-133.2.5 Centrifugal Forces ..................................................................................3-133.2.6 Wind Load..............................................................................................3-133.2.7 Collision Load ........................................................................................3-143.2.8 Train Load ..............................................................................................3-143.2.9 Seismic Load .......................................................................................... 3.14
3.3 Material ..............................................................................................................3-163.4 Quantity Calculation ..........................................................................................3-17
3.4.1 ALT-1 PC Box Girder + Single Concrete Pier.......................................3-173.4.2 ALT-2 PC Box Girder + Single Rigid Portal Frame Pier.......................3-193.4.3 ALT-3 EDSA Interchange Flyover ........................................................3-203.4.4 Railway Viaduct Simply Support Concrete Box Girder ........................3-203.4.5 Standard Span Bridge L=30m................................................................3-223.4.6 Standard Span Bridge L=35+40+35 = 110m .........................................3-223.4.7 At Grade Section for Primary Arterial Expressway...............................3-24
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11: COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Title Page No.
1.1 Equipment Rental Rates (ACEL Rates as of Nov. 1993)...............................1-31.2 Cost Component for Major Equipment, Materials, Labor and Construction
Items ...............................................................................................................1-51.3 Land Acquisition Cost Estimate for Highway ...............................................1-71.4 Initial Construction Cost Estimate for Highway............................................1-91.5 Construction Cost for Expressway with Arterial Street ............................... 1-111.6 Construction Cost for Secondary Arterial Street..........................................1-121.7 Summary of Construction Cost for Railway (MTDP 1999-2004 ................1-141.8 Cost Estimate of MMUTIS Project (MRT)..................................................1-15
2.1 Summary of Project Unit Cost for Roadway .................................................2-12.2 R-7 Expressway Viaduct ................................................................................2-22.3 ALT-1 PC Box Girder for Expressway (Flared Type Pier)............................2-32.4 ALT-2 PC Box Girder + Steel Rigid Portal Frame Pier.................................2-32.5 ALT-3 Steel Box Girder + T-Shape Steel Single Pier....................................2-42.6 ALT-4 PC Box Girder for Railway Viaduct (Standard Height H=9m)..........2-42.7 Standard Bridge –1 Span=30m (Super + Sub Structure) ...............................2-52.8 Standard Bridge –2 Span=35 + 40 + 35 (Super + Sub Structure)..................2-52.9 At Grade Section (Primary Arterial Street)....................................................2-62.10 PC Box Girder for Expressway (T-Shape Concrete Pier)..............................2-62.11 Unit Price Analysis for CCP Pile D=120 cm ................................................. 2.72.12 Unit Price Analysis For CCP Pile D=150 cm ................................................2-72.13 Unit Price Analysis.........................................................................................2-8
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No. Title Page No.
1.1 Cost Comparison of Similar Project ............................................................1-161.2 Construction Cost of Major Tollway............................................................1-171.3 Construction Cost of Ordinary Road............................................................1-18
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-1
1. INTRODUCTION
An investigation and analysis of equipment, materials and labor prices are pre-requisite for estimation of unit costs of major civil works. The construction costs ofsimilar projects in the Philippines and Southeast Asia also are investigated.
1.1 Direct Cost Component
The direct construction costs basically consists of the followings
a) Labor Costsb) Material Costsc) Equipment Costs
Data collected in the preliminary investigation are as follows
1.1.1 Labor cost
The prescribed minimum wage in the National Capital Region is P 198 perday effective from February 1998 .
Department of Labor and Employment and labor indexes for other categoriesare in compliance with the indexes of Department of Public Works andHighways as of December 1993.
The current market prices of construction materials are collected by Canvass,Market price survey and similar projects. Materials applied to the project aredivided into commercial materials and processed materials by contractors.The result of investigation for major materials are listed as follows.
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-2
UNIT PESOSa) Reinforcing Steel Grade 40 kgs 21b) Reinforcing Steel Grade 60 kgs 23c) Pre-stressing Steel Grade 270 kgs 85d) Portland Cement TYPE – 1 Bag 105e) Structural Steel kgs 29f) Asphalt Cement penetration 60/70 ton 14000g)Asphalt Cement penetration 85/100 ton 14000h) Coarse Aggregate for Sub base course Cu.m 4001)
i) Coarse Aggregate for base course Cu.m 2501)
j) Aggregate for Cement Concrete Cu.m 2291)
k) Fine Aggregate (washed) Cu.m 2881)
l) Plywood Marine ½” x 4’ x 8’ pcs 5701)
m) Plywood ordinary ½” x 4’ x 8’ pcs 270n) Gasoline (Regular) Litters 11.15o) Diesel Litters 7.13p) Motor Oil (Lubricant) Litters 60q) Lumber (Apitong) Bd. ft. 21
Sources1) Construction Industry Authority of the Philippines2) Similar road projects in the Philippines 1997.
Notes: * Hauling distances 35 km from quarry to site is assumed.1) processed prices
1.1.3 Equipment Cost
The operated rental rates per hour of the construction equipment normally areadopted based on the Associated Construction Equipment Lessors (ACEL),Inc. “Equipment Rental Rates as of November 1993. For the purpose ofestimating current rates, latest inflation rate and oil price increase must beadded by 5%. Major Equipment Rental Costs are given in Table 1.1.
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-4
1.2 Indirect Cost
Mark-ups on the estimated direct cost that are not directly involved in the work itemsare classified under the “Indirect Cost”. The mark-up on the enumerated indirect costelements are as follows;
1. Miscellaneous of other facilities 15% of direct cost2. Relocation of existing utilities 10% of direct cost3. Contractor’s over head and profit 15% of direct cost4. Physical contingencies 10% of direct cost5. Engineering service 7% of direct cost
Value Added taxes are included in Direct Cost Analysis
1.3 Currency Component
Foreign component includes the cost of imported equipment and spare parts portion oflocally purchased goods. Local component includes cost of locally producedequipment material, material supplies and remuneration of local personnel and localoverhead.
Taxes component includes applicable taxes on equipment material and labor.
Cost component of major equipment, materials, labor and construction items areestimated as given in Table 1.2 based on survey of similar latest road projects in thePhilippines.
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-5
TABLE 1.2COST COMPONENT FOR MAJOR EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, LABOR AND CONSTRUCTION ITEMS
Item No. DescriptionForeign
(%)Local(%)
Taxes(%)
Basic CostE1E2M3M4M5L6E7E8E9M10M11M12K13L14L15
Heavy EquipmentLight EquipmentReinforcing SteelPre-Stressing SteelStructural SteelLumberAsphaltDiesel OilEngine OilTiresImported Miscellaneous MaterialsLocally Produced Miscellaneous MaterialsSkilled LaborSkilled ForemanUnskilled Labor
Note: Figure given in table above are estimated based on latest similar road projects in the Philippines.
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-6
1.4 Land Acquisition Costs
Land Acquisition costs given in Table1.3 are calculated based on “Zonal Valuation1996 – 1997. Implementation of revised Zonal Valuation values of Real Propertiesfor Internal Revenue Tax Purposes” Bureau of Internal Revenue, Department ofFinance, Republic of Philippines.
1.5 Construction Cost Estimates
Based on the basic prices component prescribed above, construction cost estimates arecarried out and results one given in Table1.4 to 1.6 and Table1.7 for Roads andRailway respectively.
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-7
TABLE 1.3LAND ACQUISITION COST ESTIMATE FOR HIGHWAY
Project Structure Route / km ROW (m)Land
(SQMX103)Unit Price
P/sqmLand Acquisition
Cost P milLand Acquisition
Cost $milRemarks
A Primary Arterial Missing (6 lanes)
(1) C -3 (1) AG 0.8 34.0 27.2 4,500 122.4 3.06 1) Improvement
(2) C -3 (2) AG 5.5 34.0 187 12,800 2,393.6 59.84 2) Widening
(3) C - 4 AG 1.3 56.0 72.8 6,500 473.2 11.83 3) PartialWidening
Sub Total A 7.6 2,989.2 74.73
B Urban Expressway (6 lanes)
(4) MMS (1) EL 2.0 51.0 102 10,000 1,020.0 25.50
(5) MMS (2) EL 10.5 51.0 535.5 18,000 9,639.0 240.98
(6) MMS (3) EL 2.5 51.0 127.5 18,000 2,295.0 57.38
(7) R 101 C3 EL 7.5 51.0 382.5 10,000 3,825.0 95.63
(8) R-7E (1) EL 7.5 -
(9) R-4E (2) EL 0.4 51.0 20.4 4,000 81.6 2.04
(42) MMS (4) EL 9.2 51.0 469.2 - - -
(43) MMS (5) EL 7.8 51.0 397.8 - - -
(44) MMS (6) EL 7.5 51.0 382.5 - - -
(45) C-5E (4) EL 6.4 - - - -
(46) S-1E (1) EL 8.0 - - - -
(47) S-1E (2) EL 6.5 - - - -
(48) S-4E (1) EL 8.0 51.0 408 3,250 1,326.0 33.15
(49) S-4E (2) EL 14.5 51.0 739.5 2,750 2,033.6 50.84
(75) N-3E (1) EL 8.0 - - - -
(76) N-3E (2) EL 16.0 - - - -
(77) W-2E EL 5.5 - - - -
(86) S-5E (1) EL 5.0 51.0 255 - - -
(87) S-5E (2) EL 12.5 51.0 637.5 - - -
(88) S-5E (3) EL 7.0 51.0 357 - - -
(89) E-7E (2) EL 6.0 - - - - -
(90) R-4E (2) EL 5.0 - - - - -
Sub Total B 163.3 20,220.2 505.51
A2 Primary Arterial ( 6 lanes)
(15) S-1 (1) AG 16.5 51.0 841.5 1,000 841.5 21.04
(16) S-1 (2) AG 11.5 51.0 586.5 1,000 586.5 14.66
17 S-1 (3) AG 7.0 34.0 238 1,000 238.0 5.95
18 S-2 (1) AG 20.5 34.0 697 550 383.4 9.58
191) S-2 (2) AG 3.5 - 550 -
201) S-2 (3) AG 8.0 - 450 -
21 S-3 (1) AG 5.5 34.0 187 1,000 187.0 4.68
22 S-3 (2) AG 11.0 34.0 374 750 280.5 7.01
23 S-4 (1) AG 8.0 51.0 408 3,250 1,326.0 33.15
24 S-4 (2) AG 12.5 51.0 637.5 2,750 1,753.1 43.83
25 S-4 (3) AG 16.5 34.0 561 400 224.4 5.61
26 S-5 (4) AG 12.5 34.0 425 3,800 1,615.0 40.38
27 S-5 (5) AG 19.5 34.0 663 2,000 1,326.0 33.15
28 E-1 (1) AG 14.5 34.0 493 1,100 542.3 13.56
29 E-1 (2) AG 10.0 34.0 340 2,350 799.0 19.98
30 E-2 (1) AG 19.0 34.0 646 900 581.4 14.54
31 E-2 (2) AG 11.5 34.0 391 1,000 391.0 9.78
32 E-3 (1) AG 12.5 34.0 425 700 297.5 7.44
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
(63) W-2 (1) AG 5.5 51.5 283.25 4,500 1,274.6 31.87
(64) W-2 (2) AG 5.5 34.0 187 800 149.6 3.74
(65) W-2 (3) AG 13.0 34.0 442 1,500 663.0 16.58
(66) W-3 (1) AG 6.5 34.0 221 2,000 442.0 11.05
(67) W-3 (2) AG 8.5 34.0 289 1,000 289.0 7.23
(68) W-3 (3) AG 6.0 34.0 204 600 122.4 3.06
(69) W-4 (1) AG 5.5 34.0 187 1,000 187.0 4.68
(70) W-4 (2) AG 13.5 34.0 459 800 367.2 9.18
(71) W-4 (3) AG 7.0 34.0 238 500 119.0 2.98
(72) W-5 (1) AG 4.0 34.0 136 5,000 680.0 17.00
(73) W-5 (2) AG 19.0 34.0 646 1,000 646.0 16.15
(74) W-5 (3) AG 5.5 34.0 187 300 56.1 1.40
(78) C-5 (1) AG 1.1 51.0 56.1 2,600 145.9 3.65
(79) S-5 (1) AG 7.5 34.0 255 2,600 663.0 16.58
(80) S-5 (2) AG 17.0 34.0 578 3,000 1,734.0 43.35
(81) S-5 (3) AG 14.5 34.0 493 3,000 1,479.0 36.98
(82) R-7 AG 6.0 51.0 306 15,000 4,590.0 114.75
(83) R-4 AG 5.0 51.0 255 4,000 1,020.0 25.50
(84)1) B-1 (1) AG 3.2 34.0 109 27,000 2,937.6 73.44
(85) B-1 (2) AG 3.0 34.0 102 2,500 255.0 6.38
Sub Total A2 755.1 43,061.2 1,076.53
C Existing Primary Arterial
(12)2) R-4 AG 9.5 17.0 161.5 13,200 2,131.8 53.30
(13)3) R-5 AG 8.0 11.3 90.7 10,000 906.7 22.67
(14)3) R-5 AG 13.0 11.3 147.3 6,000 884.0 22.10
(19)2) R-8(1) AG 3.0 17.0 51.0 25,000 1,275.0 31.88
(20)3) R-8(2) AG 40.0 11.3 453.3 10,400 4,714.7 117.87
(21)2) N-1 AG 14.0 17.0 238.0 3,400 809.2 20.23
Sub Total C 87.5 94,326.9 268.03Total 160,598 1,925
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-9
TABLE 1.4INITIAL CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE FOR HIGHWAY
Project Structure Route/kmCost
$mil/kmCost$mil
% CostBorne by
PublicSec.
Cost Borneby Public
($ mil)
CrossSection
Type
A. Primary Arterial Missing (6 lanes)(1) C -3 (1) AG 0.8 3.76 3.008 1.0 3.008 II(2) C -3 (2) AG 5.5 3.76 20.68 1.0 20.680 II(3) C - 4 AG 1.3 4.13 5.369 1.0 5.369 II
Sub Total A1 7.6 29.057B. Urban Expressway (6 lanes)(4) MMS (1) EL 2.0 48.14 96.280 1.0 96.280 I(5) MMS (2) EL 10.5 48.14 505.47 1.0 505.470 I(6) MMS (3) EL 2.5 48.14 120.35 1.0 120.350 I(7) R 101 C3 EL 7.5 48.14 361.05 1.0 361.050 I(8) R-7E (1) EL 7.5 48.14 361.05 1.0 361.050 I(9) R-4E (2) EL 7.5 48.14 361.05 1.0 361.050 I(42) MMS (4) EL 9.2 48.14 442.888 1.0 442.888 I(43) MMS (5) EL 7.8 48.14 375.492 1.0 375.492 I(44) MMS (6) EL 7.5 48.14 361.05 1.0 361.050 I(45) C-5E (4) EL 6.4 48.14 308.096 1.0 308.096 I(46) S-1E (1) EL 8.0 48.14 385.120 1.0 385.120 I(47) S-1E (2) EL 6.5 48.14 312.91 1.0 312.910 I(48) S-4E (1) EL 8.0 48.14 385.120 1.0 385.120 I(49) S-4E (2) EL 14.5 48.14 698.03 1.0 698.030 I(75) N-3E (1) EL 8.0 48.14 385.120 1.0 385.120 I(76) N-3E (2) EL 16.0 48.14 770.240 1.0 770.240 I(77) W-2E EL 5.5 48.14 264.77 1.0 264.770 I(86) S-5E (1) EL 5.0 48.14 240.700 1.0 240.700 I(87) S-5E (2) EL 12.5 48.14 601.75 1.0 601.750 I(88) S-5E (3) EL 7.0 48.14 336.980 1.0 336.980 I(89) E-7E (2) EL 6.0 48.14 288.840 1.0 288.840 I(90) R-4E (2) EL 5.0 48.14 240.700 1.0 240.700 I
Sub Total B 170.4 8,203.056A2. Primary Arterial ( 6 lanes)(15) S-1 (1) AG 16.5 48.14 794.31 1.0 794.310 II(16) S-1 (2) AG 11.5 48.14 553.61 1.0 553.610 II17 S-1 (3) AG 7.0 3.76 26.320 1.0 26.320 II18 S-2 (1) AG 20.5 3.76 77.08 1.0 77.080 II191) S-2 (2) AG 3.5 3.76 13.16 1.0 13.160 II201) S-2 (3) AG 8.0 3.76 30.080 1.0 30.080 II21 S-3 (1) AG 5.5 3.76 20.68 1.0 20.680 II22 S-3 (2) AG 11.0 3.76 41.360 1.0 41.360 II23 S-4 (1) AG 8.0 48.14 385.120 1.0 385.120 I-B24 S-4 (2) AG 12.5 48.14 601.75 1.0 601.750 I-B25 S-4 (3) AG 16.5 3.76 62.04 1.0 62.040 II26 S-5 (4) AG 12.5 3.76 47 1.0 47.000 II27 S-5 (5) AG 19.5 3.76 73.32 1.0 73.320 II28 E-1 (1) AG 14.5 3.76 54.52 1.0 54.520 II29 E-1 (2) AG 10.0 3.76 37.6 1.0 37.600 II30 E-2 (1) AG 19.0 3.76 71.44 1.0 71.440 II31 E-2 (2) AG 11.5 3.76 43.24 1.0 43.240 II32 E-3 (1) AG 12.5 3.76 47 1.0 47.000 II331) E-3 (2) AG 13.0 3.76 48.88 1.0 48.880 II34 E-3 (3) AG 8.5 3.76 31.96 1.0 31.960 II35 E-3 (4) AG 7.5 3.76 28.2 1.0 28.200 II36 E-4 (1) AG 14.5 3.76 54.52 1.0 54.520 II
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-10
Project Structure Route/kmCost
$mil/kmCost$mil
% CostBorne by
PublicSec.
Cost Borneby Public
($ mil)
CrossSection
Type
371) E-4 (2) AG 5.0 3.76 18.8 1.0 18.800 II
38 E-4 (3) AG 10.0 3.76 37.600 1.0 37.600 II39 E-4 (4) AG 22.0 3.76 82.720 1.0 82.720 II40 C-5 (2) AG 6.4 48.14 308.096 1.0 308.096 I41 2-1 AG 2.5 48.14 120.35 1.0 120.350 II51 N-1 (1) AG 9.0 48.14 433.260 1.0 433.260 II52 N-1 (2) AG 14.0 48.14 673.960 1.0 673.960 II53 N-2 AG 10.5 3.76 39.48 1.0 39.480 II54 N-3 (1) AG 14.0 48.14 673.960 1.0 673.960 I-B55 N-3 (2) AG 14.0 48.14 673.960 1.0 673.960 I-B(56) N-4 (1) AG 7.0 48.14 336.980 1.0 336.980 II
571) N-4 (2) AG 7.5 48.14 361.05 1.0 361.050 II
(58) N-4 (3) AG 15.5 48.14 746.17 1.0 746.170 II(59) W-1 (1) AG 7.0 48.14 336.980 1.0 336.980 II(60) W-1 (2) AG 7.0 48.14 336.980 1.0 336.980 II(61) W-1 (3) AG 5.5 48.14 264.770 1.0 264.770 II
621) W-1 (4) AG 7.5 3.76 28.2 1.0 28.200 II
(63) W-2 (1) AG 5.5 48.14 264.77 1.0 264.770 I(64) W-2 (2) AG 5.5 3.76 20.68 1.0 20.680 II(65) W-2 (3) AG 13.0 3.76 48.880 1.0 48.880 II(66) W-3 (1) AG 6.5 3.76 24.44 1.0 24.440 II(67) W-3 (2) AG 8.5 3.76 31.96 1.0 31.960 II(68) W-3 (3) AG 6.0 3.76 22.560 1.0 22.560 II(69) W-4 (1) AG 5.5 3.76 20.68 1.0 20.680 II(70) W-4 (2) AG 13.5 3.76 50.76 1.0 50.760 II(71) W-4 (3) AG 7.0 3.76 26.320 1.0 26.320 II(72) W-5 (1) AG 4.0 3.76 15.040 1.0 15.040 II(73) W-5 (2) AG 19.0 3.76 71.440 1.0 71.440 II(74) W-5 (3) AG 5.5 3.76 20.68 1.0 20.680 II(78) C-5 (1) AG 1.1 48.14 52.954 1.0 52.954 I(79) S-5 (1) AG 7.5 3.76 28.2 1.0 28.200 II(80) S-5 (2) AG 17.0 3.76 63.920 1.0 63.920 II(81) S-5 (3) AG 14.5 3.76 54.52 1.0 54.520 II(82) R-7 AG 6.0 48.14 288.840 1.0 288.840 I(83) R-4 AG 5.0 48.14 240.700 1.0 240.700 I
(84)1) B-1 (1) AG 4.0 3.76 15.040 1.0 15.040 II
(85) B-1 (2) AG 3.0 3.76 11.280 1.0 11.280 IISub Total A2 585.5 9,990.170
C. Grade Separation (4 lanes)
(10)2) GS-1 EL 0.5 25.8 12.900 1.0 12.900 -
(11) GS-2 EL 0.5 25.8 12.900 1.0 12.900 -(12) GS-3 EL 0.5 25.8 12.900 1.0 12.900 -(13) GS-4 EL 0.5 25.8 12.900 1.0 12.900 -(14) GS-5 EL 0.5 25.8 12.900 1.0 12.900 -(50) GS-6 EL 0.5 25.8 12.900 1.0 12.900 -(91) GS-7 EL 0.5 25.8 12.900 1.0 12.900 -(92) GS-8 EL 0.5 25.8 12.900 1.0 12.900 -
Sub Total C 4.0 103.200
Total 767.5 18325.483
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-11
TA
BL
E1.
5C
ON
ST
RU
CT
ION
CO
ST
FO
R E
XP
RE
SS
WA
Y W
ITH
AR
TE
RIA
L S
TR
EE
T
To
tal
5
7,5
87
,89
5
1
1,8
33
,12
9
3
1,8
70
,56
1
4
8,1
21
,39
2
2
2,8
77
,38
3
4
0,8
63
,73
9
21
3,1
54
,09
9
Ta
x
10
,30
8,2
33
2
,11
8,1
30
5
,70
4,8
30
8
,61
3,7
29
4
,09
5,0
52
7
,31
4,6
09
38
,15
4,5
83
Lo
cal
2
3,4
95
,86
1
4,8
27
,91
7
1
3,0
03
,18
9
1
9,6
33
,52
8
9,3
33
,97
2
1
6,6
72
,40
6
8
6,9
66
,87
3
Fo
reig
n
23
,78
3,8
01
4
,88
7,0
82
13
,16
2,5
42
19
,87
4,1
35
9
,44
8,3
59
16
,87
6,7
24
88
,03
2,6
43
En
gin
ee
rin
g
serv
ice
3
,76
7,4
32
7
74
,13
0
2
,08
4,9
90
3
,14
8,1
28
1
,49
6,6
51
2
,67
3,3
29
13
,94
4,6
60
con
tra
cto
r's o
ver
he
ad
4
,56
6,2
16
93
8,2
64
2
,52
7,0
56
3
,81
5,6
05
1
,81
3,9
76
3
,24
0,1
37
16
,90
1,2
54
ph
ysic
al
con
ten
ge
ncy
3,0
44
,14
4
6
25
,50
9
1,6
84
,70
4
2,5
43
,73
7
1,2
09
,31
7
2,1
60
,09
1
1
1,2
67
,50
2
relo
catio
n
4
,20
0,9
18
8
63
,20
2
2
,32
4,8
92
3
,51
0,3
57
1
,66
8,8
58
2
,98
0,9
26
15
,54
9,1
53
mis
cella
-ne
ou
s
5
,47
9,4
59
1
,12
5,9
16
3
,03
2,4
68
4
,57
8,7
26
2
,17
6,7
71
3
,88
8,1
64
20
,28
1,5
04
on
/off
ra
mp
6
,08
8,2
88
1
,25
1,0
18
3
,36
9,4
08
5
,08
7,4
73
2
,41
8,6
35
4
,32
0,1
82
22
,53
5,0
04
Co
st p
er
Km
10
4,3
12
,00
0
thro
ug
h w
ay
3
0,4
41
,43
8
6,2
55
,09
0
1
6,8
47
,04
2
2
5,4
37
,36
6
1
2,0
93
,17
4
2
1,6
00
,91
1
11
2,6
75
,02
1
20
% o
f d
ire
ct c
ost
10
% o
f d
ire
ct c
ost
15
% o
f 1
) +
2)
15
% o
f d
ire
ct c
ost
10
% o
f d
ire
ct c
ost
Le
ng
th
10
00
83
4,0
12
83
4,0
12
83
4,0
12
83
4,0
12
83
4,0
12
83
4,0
12
5,0
04
,07
2
Wid
th
34
.00
Le
ng
th
(km
)
36
.5
7.5
20
.2
30
.5
14
.5
25
.9
13
5
Un
it
30
68
Me
tro
Ma
nila
Sky
wa
y
R-1
0/C
-3 E
xpre
ssw
ay
(n.H
ab
ou
r-A
. B
on
ifaci
o)
Pa
sig
Exp
ress
wa
y (C
-3 M
arc
os
Hig
hw
ay)
R-7
Exp
ress
wa
y (C
-3-D
PW
H 3
)
Ma
nila
-Ca
vite
Exp
ress
wa
y (S
ou
th E
DS
A-K
aw
it)
C-5
Exp
ress
wa
y D
ilim
an
-Ro
xas
Blv
d.)
To
tal
Dire
ct C
ost
Ind
ere
ct C
ost
2)
Ph
sica
l Co
nte
ng
en
cy
3)
En
gin
ee
rin
g S
erv
ice
Un
it C
ost
of
Ma
jor
Wo
rks
at
gra
de
re
ha
bili
tatio
n 1
/
XM
MS
XR
10
C3
XR
4
XR
7
XM
C
XC
5
A B C
4)
Mis
celle
ne
uo
s o
f o
the
r fa
cilit
ies
3)
Re
loca
tion
of
exi
stin
g u
tiliti
es
2)
On
/ o
ff r
am
p a
nd
oth
ers
1)
Co
ntr
uct
or's
ove
rhe
ad
an
d g
en
era
l exp
en
ces
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Co
st
7%
of
dir
ect
co
st +
co
st (
B-1
), a
nd
(B
-2)
1)
Ma
jor
wo
rks
(th
ou
gh
wa
y)
Nam
eC
od
e
To
tal C
ost
(1
03 x p
eso
s)In
dir
ect
co
st (
10
3 x p
eso
s)D
ire
ct c
ost
(1
03 x
pe
sos)
Un
it C
ost
(1
03 x
p
eso
s)
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-12
TA
BL
E1.
6C
ON
ST
RU
CT
ION
CO
ST
FO
R S
EC
ON
DA
RY
AR
TE
RIA
L S
TR
EE
T
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-13
TA
BL
E1.
6C
ON
ST
RU
CT
ION
CO
ST
FO
R S
EC
ON
DA
RY
AR
TE
RIA
L S
TR
EE
T
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-14
TABLE 1.7SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION COST FOR RAIL WAY
(MTDP 1999-2004)
Line 1 Line 2 Line 3 Line 4 MCX North Rail Remarks
MRT LINE-2 Taytay – Binangonan AG 10.0 21.67 216.7 0.6 130.09 R-2S(2) Sub Total R-2S 516.2 1217.4
B Sub Total Line-2 3323.3 1401.210 R-3W MRT LINE 3 Monumento - R10 EL 10.0 30.56 498.1 0.6 298.911 R-30 MRT LINE 3 Monumento - South EL 16.8 30.56 655.0 0.0 -12 R-3S MRT LINE 3 Sounth Terminal – EL 15.0 30.56 458.4 0.6 275.0
C Sub Total LINE 3 1611.5 573.913 R-40 MRT LINE 4 Old Bilibid – EDSA UG(S) 9.0 64.23 578.1 0.6 346.9
Sub Total R-40 999.8 599.915 R-4E MRT LINE 4 Doña Carmen - San EL 6.2 30.56 189.5 0.6 113.7
D Total LINE R-4 1189.3 713.616 R-5N North Rail Malolos – Santolan AG 19.0 21.67 411.7 0.6 247.017 R-5N North Rail Santolan – Solis EL 11.5 30.56 351.4 0.6 210.8
Sub Total R-5N 763.1 457.918 R-5M(1) North Rail C.M. Recto - Fort UG(S) 13.65 89.52 1221.9 0.6 733.1
R-5M(2) North Rail C.M. Recto - Fort UG(c/c) 5.85 64.23 375.7 0.6 225.419 R-5S(1) North Rail Fort Bonifacio - Don EL 5 30.56 152.8 0.6 91.7
R-5S(2) North Rail Don Bosco – Dasmariñas EL 19.5 30.56 595.9 0.6 357.5Sub Total R-5S 748.7 449.2
E Sub Total Line-5 3109.4 1865.620 R-6N MRT LINE 6 San Jose Delmonte – EL 13.9 30.56 424.8 0.6 254.9
R-6N MRT LINE 6 Canumay – EDSA UG(c/c) 4.2 64.23 269.8 0.6 161.9Sub Total R-6N 694.6 416.8
21 R-6C MRT LINE 6 EDSA - San Andres UG(S) 10.7 89.52 957.8 0.6 574.722 R-6M MRT LINE 6 San Andres - West UG(S) 11.8 89.52 1056.3 0.6 633.823 R-6M MRT LINE 6 West Bicutan – Alabang EL 10.3 30.52 314.8 0.6 188.9
Sub Total R-6M 1371.1 822.724 R-6S MRT LINE 6 Alabang – Binal EL 10.3 30.56 314.8 0.6 188.925 R-6S MRT LINE 6 Binal – Calamba AG 18.0 21.67 390 0.6 234.0
Sub Total 6S 704.8 422.9F Sub Total Line-6 3728.3 2237.0
TOTAL 14572.4 7757.61) AG : At Grade2) EL : Elevated3) UG (S) : Under Ground Shield Tunnel4) UG (c/c) : Under Ground Cut and Cover5) AG : 0.35 km x 21.67 = 7.58
UG (c/c) : 0.90 km x 64.23 = 57.81EL : 2.75 km x 30.56 = 384.64
14.00 km 450.13 / 14 = 32.50
METRO MANILA URBAN TRANSPORTATION INTEGRATION STUDY
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 11 COST ESTIMATION AND DESIGN CRITERIA
1-16
FIGURE 1.1COST COMPARISON OF SIMILAR PROJECT
Project Km. LocationUS$
MillionUS$
Million/kmRemarks
1 MRT LINE-2 Phase 1 14.0 CM Recto - Santolan 988 70.6 U.C. 1997