Top Banner
Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006
45

Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Dec 30, 2015

Download

Documents

Richard Casey
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Cost Analysis

N287E Spring 2006Professor: Joanne Spetz10 May 2006

Page 2: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Costs are…

Expenditures of cashNon-cash expenditures (depreciation)

Page 3: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Ways to divide and analyze costs

Direct vs. Indirect Direct costs

Salaries, supplies, etc. Indirect costs

Benefits, depreciation, support departments

Variable vs. Fixed Variable costs Fixed costs Semi-fixed costs (step function) Semi-variable

Page 4: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

What costs do you have control over?

All costs?Direct costs only?Variable costs only?

It’s very important to be clear about the control you have

Page 5: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Making decisions about the future requires information about

Avoidable costs Variable costs and some fixed costs

Sunk costs Fixed costs that cannot be undone

Incremental costs (marginal)Opportunity costs Other things you could have done

Page 6: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

A note about opportunity cost

Other things you could have done have value Return on alternate investments Return from basic investment

This is why is discount future earnings and costs

Page 7: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Discounting future earnings

$100 received this year is more valuable than $100 received next year You could take the $100 this year and

invest it to get interest for next year

Thus, future earnings are discounted If “discount rate” is 5%, then next year

is worth 5% less than this year

Page 8: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Numerical example of discounting

$100 per year to be received for 5 yearsYear 1 - $100 no discountYear 2 - $100 discounted 5% = 100*.95 = $95Year 3 - $100 discounted 5% twice = (100)*(.95)*(.95) = $90.25Year 4 - $100 discounted 3 times = $85.74Year 5 - $100 discounted 4 times = $81.45

Page 9: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Measuring costs in a hospital

Units are categorized by Direct or indirect cost Revenue-producing or not

Nonrevenue units are usually indirect costs Indirect costs are allocated to

revenue-producing units to make pricing decisions

Page 10: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Ways to allocate indirect costs

Step-down method The department with the least service from

others allocated first Go in order form least to most Problem: results vary by order of allocation

Double-distribution method Go through the loop twice

Simultaneous equation method Create equations for allocation and solve the

math

Page 11: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

The math problem

Fixed cost + (variable cost * quantity) = price * quantity

AFTER SOME ALGEBRA…

Quantity = (fixed cost)/(price-var cost)

ORPrice =((fixed cost)/quantity) + var cost

Page 12: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

What if you go over budget?

Price changeEfficiency changesVolume changesIntensity changes

Page 13: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Creating a standard cost profile

A standard cost profile (SCP) is a cost breakdown for a single item/task

Page 14: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

SCP for an IV…

Cost category

Quantity

Req’d fixed

Unit cost

Var cost

Av fixed cost

Av total cost

Direct labor .10 .05 $20 $2 $1 $3

Materials 1.00 0 $3 $3 $0 $3

Dept overhead

0 .25 $1 $0 $.25 $0.25

Allocated costs

0 .50 $4 $0 $2 $2

TOTALS $5 $3.25 $8.25

Average fixed cost = fixed units needed multiplied by unit cost

Page 15: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Assume that…

The nursing department was budgeted for 100 IV’sThe department did 90 IV’sTo do these IV’s, the hospital used 15 hours of labor and paid $22/hourWe can examine how this varied from our budget…

Page 16: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Price variance

Price variance = (actual price – standard price) *

actual Q

= ($22 - $20) * 15 = $30

Page 17: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Efficiency variance

Efficiency variance = (actual Q – standard Q) * standard price

Standard Q = Var labor req * IV’s done + budget fixed=.10*90 + .05*100 = 9+5 = 14

Eff var = (15-14)*$20 = $20

Page 18: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Volume variance

Volume variance = (budget Q – actual Q) * av fixed cost

per unit

= (100-90) * $1 = $10

Page 19: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

These add up…

Actual direct labor cost = $22*15=$330Standardized cost = 3*90=$270

Difference between these = $60Price variance = $30Efficiency variance = $20Volume variance = $10

These add to $60These tell us what share of overrun

came from price, efficiency, volume!

Page 20: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Standard treatment protocols

A cost sheet for a larger “product” E.g., an inpatient stay or diagnosis

It looks like a SCP, for the most partFor a STP, you can compute: Intensity variance =

(actual SU’s – std SU’s)*std cost per SU=(90-100) * $8.25 = -$82.5This is favorable because fewer IV’s were done than expected.

Page 21: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

In this example…

We went over budget

But the intensity variance was favorable

Page 22: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Variations in costs…

Average = mean =x = x/NVariance = ((xi -x)2)/(N-1)

Standard deviation = variance =

If “normally” distributed:68% will be within one std dev95% within two std devs99.7% within three std devs

Page 23: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

More measures

Median Half of sample is above Half of sample is below

Percentiles 25th percentile = 25% are below

Page 24: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Use of these statistics

You want to investigate abnormally high or low costsYou want to do investigations only when the “payoff” is worth it Payoff defined by cost of investigation

and potential benefit of correction

You can use statistics to determine your “cutoff” for investigation

Page 25: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Payoff tables

Is the unit behaving properly?

Action In control Not in control

Investigate I I+C

Do not investigate

0 LI = cost to investigateC = cost to correctL = loss with no correction

Page 26: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Payoff tables and statistics

If P = probability of being in control… (1-P) = probability of not being in control

If we investigate: Cost = P(I)+(1-P)(I+C) = PI+I+C-PI-PC =

I+(1-P)C

It we do not investigate Cost = P(0)+(1-P)L = (1-P)L

Page 27: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Cost comparison

If the cost of investigating is greater than the cost of not investigating, we don’t investigate: If I+(1-P)C < (1-P)L investigate

I + C – CP < L – LP-CP < L-LP-I-CLP-CP < L-I-C(L-C)P < (L-C) – IP < ((L-C)-I)/(L-C) = 1-(I/(L-C))

Page 28: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

How to determine P?

We can guess P based on distribution of data, or just make a best guessWe can focus on cases a certain number of standard deviations from mean to define P

Page 29: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

When analyzing cost data…

One can examine: Prior period values

(variance over time) Departmental values

(variance within and across departments)

There are many numerical examples in Cleverly

Page 30: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

As a nursing manager…

What can you do to control costs?

Identify sources of savings

Develop strategies for change

Page 31: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Identifying sources of savings

Reducing costs does not have to reduce quality

There is wide variation in nursing costs

Page 32: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Survey of 180+ acute care hospitals from ~1998

Total cost per patient day

Labor cost per pat. day

Case-mix index (CMI)

Average of top 25%

$323 $297 1.40

Median $235 $212 1.25

Average of lowest 25%

$188 $174 1.25

Page 33: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Even the best performers have variance

Hamel Hospital Total nursing cost per patient day =

$186 21% below $235 median

Within the hospital, cost variance per patient day (compared to Hamel) Critical care 7.4% better than median Med-surg 3.8% better than median Intermediate care 42.1% worse than median

Page 34: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Where do differences comes from?

Differences do not appear to come from Shifting tasks to “support” departments Reductions in skill mix

They do appear to come from Reduced overtime Reduced per-diem Fewer FTEs overall (is this good or bad?)

Page 35: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

How do you compare your hospital’s costs?

Each hospital is unique

Start with national benchmarksOther approaches: Across-the-board reductions Bottom-up campaigns

Page 36: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Cost-saving strategiesBenchmarking Across-

board cutsBottom-up campaigns

Advantages “objective” “fair” “support from staff”

Effective at aggressively reducing cost

Good for morale

Disadvantages

No regard for individual needs

Penalizes top performers

Small cost savings

Staff resents this

Results are arbitrary

Usually focuses on less important causes of high costs

Page 37: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Best strategy:

Combination of strategies!!!

Page 38: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Creating a good report is important

Variance Report

Unit Actual Budget Variance Actual Budget Variance3N $195 $182 ($13) 51 11,070 8.90 8.10 (0.80)3W $217 $185 ($32) 88 2,739 10.10 9.40 (0.70)5N $145 $146 $1 53 11,316 6.80 7.20 0.40CCU $549 $464 ($85) 3 704 19.90 17.30 (2.60)ICU 1 $526 $486 ($40) 13 2,854 21.80 18.90 (2.90)ICU 2 $523 $489 ($34) 23 4,968 20.91 18.13 (2.78)Maternity $171 $180 $9 31 6,746 6.92 6.41 (0.51)6N $163 $149 ($14) 37 8,040 7.70 7.40 (0.30)9E $163 $147 ($16) 20 4,294 7.90 6.70 (1.20)Mother/Baby $322 $249 ($73) 19 4,040 13.10 10.70 (2.40)NICU $299 $309 $10 21 4,419 11.70 12.20 0.50

Total cost per patient day Worked hours per patient dayAverage daily census

Patient days

Problems:1. Comparable units not compared clearly2. Benchmarking by budget assumes budget was good3. No quality metrics4. No staff turnover metrics5. Patient days might miss stays under 24 hours6. No adjustment for turnover of patients7. No acuity adjustment

Page 39: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Creating a good report…Worked Hours per Patient Day, Med/Surg Unit 3N

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Unit 3N Actual Unit 3N Budget Internal benchmark National benchmark

Problems:1. Budget might reflect historical

underperformance2. Why is the internal benchmark 6.8? This is

5N’s actual, but it is comparable?

Page 40: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

A better report!Variance Report

Unit Actual BudgetNational

benchmarkVariance -

budgetVariance - benchmark

3N 51 11,070 8.90 8.10 7.77 -9.9% -14.5%3W 88 2,739 10.10 9.40 9.76 -7.4% -3.5%5N 53 11,316 6.80 7.20 7.77 5.6% 12.5%6N 37 8,040 7.70 7.40 8.71 -4.1% 11.6%9E 20 4,294 7.90 6.70 8.91 -17.9% 11.3%Maternity 31 6,746 6.92 6.41 11.18 -8.0% 38.1%Mother/Baby 19 4,040 13.10 10.70 6.80 -22.4% -92.6%CCU 3 704 19.90 17.30 18.87 -15.0% -5.5%ICU 1 13 2,854 21.80 18.90 18.70 -15.3% -16.6%ICU 2 23 4,968 20.91 18.13 18.84 -15.3% -11.0%NICU 21 4,419 11.70 12.20 10.57 4.1% -10.7%

Average daily census

Patient days

Worked hours per patient day

Units grouped by similarity

National benchmark

Unrealistic budget?

Beating the budget but not the benchmark

Page 41: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Another good reportVariance report

Unit Actual BudgetInternal

BenchmarkNational

BenchmarkVariance Budget

Variance Internal

Variance National

ICU 1 20.3 20.1 20.0 18.1 -1.0% -1.5% -12.2%ICU 2 20.8 20.9 20.0 18.1 0.5% -4.0% -14.9%ICU 3 20.0 19.8 20.0 15.8 -1.0% 0.0% -26.6%Tele 1 10.4 9.9 10.4 8.2 -5.1% 0.0% -26.8%Tele 2 10.7 10.2 10.4 9.1 -4.9% -2.9% -17.6%Surg 1 3W 8.5 8.2 8.1 6.5 -3.7% -4.9% -30.8%Surg 2 3E 10.3 8.6 8.1 6.5 -19.8% -27.2% -58.5%Med 1 5N 9.2 8.5 8.1 7.1 -8.2% -13.6% -29.6%Med 2 4N 8.1 7.9 8.1 6.8 -2.5% 0.0% -19.1%Med 3 4S 8.2 8.5 8.1 6.8 3.5% -1.2% -20.6%Med 4 7E 8.7 8.6 8.1 7.6 -1.2% -7.4% -14.5%

Worked hours per equivalent patient day Variance Analysis

Internal benchmarks are important

Compare to national benchmark – can be more aggressive?

Better range of comparisons

Still room to improve!

Page 42: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Some issues & ideas

Use the internal best performer to get ideas for improving other unitsMake units’ data comparable Use the same acuity system Make sure national benchmark has

same acuity system

Page 43: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

The problem with midnight census

7am – 3pm 24 patients3pm – 11pm 29 patients11pm – 7am 20 patientspatient days

24.3 = average census

So… Actual HPPD Target HPPDPt days 6.26 6.01Blended ADC 5.15 6.01And adjust for admissions, discharges,

transfers

Page 44: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Be logical in figuring out where costs are

uncontrollable controllable

unit pat nurse regulations non-RN laborconfig mix comp. labor

overhead supplies too expensemany per FTE

cost too too FTEsper much many cost per richsupply orderedused direct indirect RN too skill

hours hours high mix

premium agepay mix

Page 45: Cost Analysis N287E Spring 2006 Professor: Joanne Spetz 10 May 2006.

Using nursing quality to help benchmarking

Unit Cost PPD Falls Responds to complaints

5E $168 3.6 77

6N $163 2.7 90

4S $185 3.0 81

3W $155 6.3 55Who is the best performer?