Cosmology from Type II Supernovae Mario Hamuy – Thomas de Jaeger – Lluis Galbany – Santiago González Departamento de Astronomía – FCFM -- Universidad de Chile Millennium Institute of Astrophysics Future and Science of Gemini 2015, Toronto, June 16 2015
37
Embed
Cosmology from Type II SupernovaePCA of type II SN light curves 116 SNe II V-band LC from A14 Temporal reference (X reference) Magnitude units (Y units) Standardization 5different
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Cosmology from Type II Supernovae
Mario Hamuy – Thomas de Jaeger – Lluis Galbany – Santiago GonzálezDepartamento de Astronomía – FCFM -- Universidad de Chile
Millennium Institute of Astrophysics
Future and Science of Gemini 2015, Toronto, June 16 2015
Improvement in precision between 1998-2014 !
60 Type Ia SupernovaePerlmutter et al. 1998
Riess et al. 1998
740 Type Ia SupernovaeBetoule et al. 2014
JLA SNe = low-z + SDSS II + SNLS + HSTBetoule et al. 2014
740 SNe:
118 low-z (Calán/Tololo; CfA, CSP)374 SDSS II (3 years, Sako et al. 2014)239 SNLS (3 years, Conley et al. 2011)9 HST (Riess et al 2007)
0.15-0.20mag
Improvement in precision between 1998-2014 !
60 Type Ia SupernovaePerlmutter et al. 1998
Riess et al. 1998
740 Type Ia SupernovaeBetoule et al. 2014
What causes acceleration? Dark energy, P=ωε ?
Cosmological constant, P=-ε , ω = -1 ?
With increasingly larger samplessystematic errors become critical
Alternative methods?
Type II Supernova light curves(Anderson et al. 2014)
GREAT
DIVERSITY
Velocity Curve(Hamuy & Pinto 2002)
Simple Approach
The luminosities of Type II
supernovae can be standardized
Luminosity-Velocity Relation(Hamuy & Pinto 2002)
The Standardized Candle Method (SCM)(Hamuy & Pinto 2002)
0.39 mag
The Standardized Candle Method (SCM)(Olivares et al. 2010)
0.31 mag
Luminosity-Velocity RelationObservations match Theory!
Kasen & Woosley 2009
0.27 mag
The Standardized Candle Method Revisited(Carnegie Supernova Program, de Jaeger et al. 2015)
� 2004-2009
� z=0.01-0.05
� Filters: ugri + BVYJHK
� Optical spectroscopy
� 54 Supernovae
The Standardized Candle Method Revisited(Carnegie Supernova Program, de Jaeger et al. 2015)
The Standardized Candle Method Revisited(Carnegie Supernova Program, de Jaeger et al. 2015)
The Luminosity-Velocity Relation Revisited(Carnegie Supernova Program, Gutiérrez et al. 2015)
The Standardized Candle Method Revisited(Carnegie Supernova Program, de Jaeger et al. 2015)
r-band
The Standardized Candle Method Revisited(Carnegie Supernova Program, de Jaeger et al. 2015)
J-band
The Standardized Candle Method (SCM)(Hamuy 2004)
0.38 mag
The Standardized Candle Method (SCM)(Nugent et al. 2006)
0.26 mag
The Standardized Candle Method (SCM)(Poznanski et al. 2009)
0.25 mag
The Standardized Candle Method (SCM)(D´Andrea et al. 2010)
0.29 mag
redshift
The Standardized Candle Method (SCM)(Poznanski et al. 2010)
0.25 mag
The Standardized Candle Method (SCM)(Maguire et al. 2010)
0.15 mag
So far so good, but what if we didn´t have spectroscopic information?
Can we come up with a method solely based on photometry?
The Photometric Candle Method (PCM)
Type II Supernova light curves(Anderson, et al. 2014)
time
brightness
s2
s3
Mmax
Mend
MtailPd
OPTd
s1
Trise
defined in Anderson et al. 2014
time
brightness
s2
s1
s3
Mmax
Mend
MtailPd
OPTd
Real data:
SN 2008m
The Photometric Candle Method(Carnegie Supernova Program, de Jaeger et al. 2015)
Anderson et al. 2014
HUBBLE FLOW cz>3000 km s-1
The Photometric Candle Method(Carnegie Supernova Program, de Jaeger et al. 2015)
( ) ZP+cz=βCαs+m 5log2 −
PCA of type II SN light curves
116 SNe II V-band LC from A14
Temporal reference (X reference)
Magnitude units (Y units)
Standardization
5 different options: TEXP, TMAX, TPT, TTRANS, TEND