Corporate Practice of Medicine: Finding Your Way Through the Maze
Corporate Practice of Medicine: Finding Your Way Through the Maze
2
Contact Information
Matthew MiloneHolland & Hart LLP
9555 Hillwood Drive, 2nd FloorLas Vegas, Nevada 89134Telephone: 702-222-2561
E-mail: [email protected]
3
Overview
Subjects covered:– What is the corporate practice of medicine– History of the corporate practice of medicine– Sources of corporate practice of medicine restrictions– Models used in various states– Current state and federal views on the corporate
practice of medicine– Current trends and future outlook for corporate practice
of medicine.
4
What is the Corporate Practice of Medicine Late 19th/Early 20th Century – two models of patient
treatment emerge:1. A corporation hires or contracts with a physician to
provide medical services to its own employees and their families.
– “Contract practice”2. Hospitals or other non-physician owned health care
entities employed physicians to provide medical services to the public.
– “Corporate Practice”
5
What is the Corporate Practice of Medicine Today, the corporate practice of medicine
typically refers to:1. Employment of a physician by a corporation; or2. Investment/Ownership in a medical practice by
an unlicensed person.
6
What is the Corporate Practice of Medicine Corporate practice of medicine usually refers to
medical doctors and/or doctors of osteopathic medicine
Beware:– Many states have separate statutory provisions and
licensing boards for D.O.’s & M.D.’s These statutes can be subject to differing
interpretations Even where statutes are the same or similar, differing
M.D. & D.O. boards may interpret and apply the statutes differently.
7
What is the Corporate Practice of Medicine Beware:
– Other professionals (dentists, optometrists, etc…) may have additional restrictions in a particular state Nevada – Statutory restrictions on the corporate practice
of dentistry and management services organizations Idaho – Additional restrictions on the corporate practice of
veterinary medicine Florida – Generally viewed as not having corporate
practice of medicine restrictions, but does have restrictions on the corporate practice of dentistry and optometry.
8
When is the Corporate Practice of Medicine an Issue Partnerships between professionals with different
licenses Investment in medical practices by unlicensed
persons Ownership of practice by key administrative
employees Employment of physicians by hospitals and other
medical facilities Ownership of medical group or practice by
unlicensed persons
9
When is the Corporate Practice of Medicine an Issue States typically do not consider ownership of a
medical facility (hospital, imaging center, skilled nursing facility, etc…) as violating the corporate practice of medicine.– Physician employment by such entities varies from state
to state. Trend has been to limit physician ownership of
facilities:– Anti-referral laws (Stark, Anti-Kickback Statute)– Physician owned hospital expansion prohibitions (ACA §
6001)
10
Sources of Corporate Practice of Medicine Restrictions Most common:
– Statutes– Attorney General Opinions– Medical Board decisions and/or position statements– Court decisions
11
Sources of Corporate Practice of Medicine Restrictions Attorney General Opinions and Medical Board
Positions are often based on the interpretation of statutes that do not expressly forbid the corporate practice of medicine:– Fee splitting provisions– Aiding in the unlicensed practice of medicine– Defining a “person” under the medical licensing statutes
12
History of the Corporate Practice of Medicine 1869 Professional Journal:
“In all of our American colleges medicine has ever been and is now, the most despised of all the professions which liberally-educated men are expected to enter.”
13
History of the Corporate Practice of Medicine Mid to late 19th Century – AMA takes steps to
legitimize practice of medicine:– Credential Medical Schools– Create professional criteria and standards– Push non-traditional practitioners to fringes– Eliminate practices such as traveling medical providers
Late 19th / Early 20th Century– AMA began lobbying efforts at the state level to create
licensing statutes & medical boards
14
History of the Corporate Practice of Medicine Early 20th Century –AMA and other physicians
groups took on what they saw as primary threats to the physician in the marketplace:– Contract practice– Corporate practice– Hospitals
While the AMA was not able to prevent the expansion of hospitals it was successful in limiting contract practice and corporate practice
15
History of the Corporate Practice of Medicine AMA’s efforts paid off:
– Medicine grew to one of, if not the, most esteemed professions in America
– Criteria to receive a medical degree increased– Harder to obtain a licensee– State laws protected physician autonomy– Fees for medical services and physician incomes
increased
16
History of the Corporate Practice of Medicine 1970’s – Federal Action
– HMO act passes allowing for creation of entities that employ physicians (staff model HMO)
– FTC orders that the AMA’s Principles of Medical Ethics were inherently anti-competitive
– FTC ordered AMA to modify ethical restrictions on physician contracts and payment structures
17
History of the Corporate Practice of Medicine 1980’s – 2000’s
– Growth of hospitals and managed care organizations– Increased federal regulation of health care
HIPAA Stark and other referral laws ACA
– Some states begin to reconsider corporate practice of medicine restrictions
18
Current Status of Corporate Practice of Medicine Thirty-Three States have some form of corporate
practice of medicine restriction– Enforcement varies from state to state– Prohibitions and exceptions are state specific
Seventeen states and the District of Columbia are generally viewed as not having corporate practice of medicine restrictions
19
Current Status of Corporate Practice of Medicine Federal Government:
– HMO act remains law HMOs are generally viewed as an exception to corporate
practice of medicine restrictions in most states– Failure to comply with state corporate practice of
medicine restrictions do not create a “false certification” for purposes of the federal false claims act. Ebeid ex rel. U.S. v. Lungwitz 616 F.3d 993 (9th Cir. 2010)
20
Current Status of Corporate Practice of Medicine Accountable Care Organizations:
– A new exception to corporate practice of medicine?– Does the Affordable Care Act preempt state corporate
practice of medicine restrictions with regard to ACOs– ACOs can be formed by: ACO professionals, including
physicians and nurse practitioners, in group practice arrangements; networks of individual practices of ACO professionals; joint ventures between hospitals and ACO professionals; Hospitals employing ACO professionals.
21
Current Status of Corporate Practice of Medicine Pressures on Physicians:
– Increased administrative burdens payment requirements, electronic medical records, etc…
– Increasingly complex regulatory environment referral laws, privacy laws, health reform
– Uncertainty of future reimbursement– Increased costs of medical equipment and devices to
remain competitive
22
Current Status of Corporate Practice of Medicine Many physicians looking at various practice
models:– Hospital or medical facility employment– Larger medical groups– ACOs/ IPAs– Investment from unlicensed persons– Sell medical practice to larger entities
This has caused many to reconsider the corporate practice of medicine
23
AMA Principles on Physician Employment Adopted at the 2012 Interim Meeting of the AMA
House of Delegates Address “unique challenges to professionalism and
the practice of medicine arising in the face of physician employment.”
Acknowledges the reality of physician employment:– “Physicians should be fee to enter into mutually
satisfactory contractual arrangements, including employment, with hospitals, health care systems, medical groups and other entities as permitted by law…”
24
AMA Principles on Physician Employment Attempts to prevent conflicts of interest and
preserve physician integrity– Employed physicians should be free to exercise “personal
and professional judgment”– Patient welfare must take priority over profit– Agreements must be negotiated in good faith– Agreements should provide for a fair hearing process or
other due process before termination for cause– Physicians discouraged from entering into to non-competition
agreements– Only physicians should participate in peer review of
employed physicians.
25
Complying with AMA Principles
All contracts and job descriptions should stress the requirement of the physician to exercise his or her own independent professional judgment.
Explain that any existing quality assurance, utilization review, payment arrangement, or similar plan should not be interpreted to impede or interfere with the independent medical judgment of the physician in treating patients.
Set forth compensation arrangement in detail and have the parties agree that the arrangement will not affect professional judgment.
Identify procedure for termination with cause. Contain provisions regarding notification of patients, ownership of
records, etc… upon termination. Identify dispute resolution procedures.
26
AMA Principles on Physician Employment Existing state laws may echo AMA Principles. Examples:
– Utah Code 58-67-802 - allows for employment of physicians, but prohibits interference with professional judgment
– Colorado Revised Statute § 25-3-103.7 allows employment of physicians by certain health facilities, with limitations: Employer cannot influence professional judgment of physician Compensation cannot be based on a percentage of the fee
collected or otherwise incentive unnecessary use of services Staff bylaws cannot discriminate on the basis of employment
27
Typical Exceptions to Corporate Practice of Medicine HMOs/MCOs Professional Corporations Hospitals
– Varies from state to state– Some states recognize profit v. non-profit or public v.
private distinctions Other Medical Facilities
– Varies from state to state
28
Typical Exceptions to Corporate Practice of Medicine Areas for Concern:
– Management Services Organization (“MSO”) MSO provides all equipment, property, employees,
etc… MSO receives a fee (in many cases a % of profit) Must look at fee-splitting laws Some states (e.g. California) have additional
restrictions on MSOs Where MSO is owned by a referral source, referral
laws must be complied with.
29
Typical Exceptions to Corporate Practice of Medicine Areas of Concern:
– Friendly Physician/ Nominee Physician owns a professional corporation, but allows non-
physicians to control business. Profits are assigned to non-physician
Fee splitting concerns Physician ethical requirements: aiding in the unlicensed
practice of medicine or allowing the use of medical license by another person
– Medical Director Relationship Physician acts as a medical director of non-physician owned
entity Some states restrict (California)
30
Typical Exceptions to Corporate Practice of Medicine In states that allow professional corporations:
– How can ownership of the professional corporations be structured Does state law permit any percentage of professional
corporation to be owned by unlicensed person? Assignment of interest to trust? Assignment of profits? Allowance for unlicensed board members and
officers?
31
Enforcement
Who enforces:– Board of Medical Examiners:
Does state law provide Board power to reach unlicensed persons
– State Attorney General Penalties:
– Injunction from engaging in activity– Revocation of corporate form (creates liability issues)– Loss or suspension of medical license– Criminal penalties for practicing law without a license
32
Enforcement
Enforcement of corporate practice of medicine is inconsistent
Each state differs in its level of enforcement activity
Some states may not be actively enforcing because they are unsure of the results of a court challenge
Even within states, different boards may enforce differently
33
Specific State Issues(Not a Complete Statement of State law)
Nevada Utah Idaho California Colorado
CPOM Restriction
Yes No. But Certain Limitations Apply
Yes Yes Yes
Source of Restriction
Nevada Attorney General Opinions- AGO 1977-219- AGO 2002-10
Statutes- Utah Code 58-67-802- Utah Code 58-67-501(1)(c)
- State Board of Medical Examiners Position- Case LawSee e.g. Worlton v. Davis, 249 P.2d 810 (1952)- February 26, 2007 Memorandum to BME (identifies exceptions)
- Medical Board of California Decisions (Relying on Business & Professional Code §§2052 & 2400)- Attorney General Opinions- Case Law (some inconsistency)
Statutes- CRS §12-36-134 (1)(g)(7)- CRS §12-36-117(m)But see:- CRS § 25-3-103.7 (health facilities)- CRS § 6-18-301, et. seq. (provider networks)
Scope Employment of a physician by a corporation or unlicensed person
Interference with medical judgment or physician/ patient relationship
Employment of a physician by a corporation or unlicensed person
- Employment of a physician by a corporation or unlicensed person- Physician not exerting control of relationship where treatment of patients is at issue (e.g. MSOs)
- Physician practicing with or in a joint venture with an unlicensed person and/or corporation- Employment of a physician
34
Specific State Issues(Not a Complete Statement of State law)
Nevada Utah Idaho California Colorado
PotentialExceptions
- HMOs- Managed Care Organizations- Professional Corporations - Other entities regulated by the Nevada Commissioner of Insurance (?)
As long as the parties do not engage in prohibited conduct, physician employment relationships are allowed.
- HMOs/ MCOs- Professional Corporations- Jails and Private Prison Facilities- Public Health Districts- County Hospitals - Private Hospitals- Skilled Nursing Facilities- Other Medical Facilities (?)
- Professional Corporations (51% can be owned by physician 49% can be owner by certain other licensees)- HMOs/ Prepaid Health Plans- Medi-Cal Managed Care Plans- Narcotic Treatment Programs- Non-profit research clinics- Non-profit community clinics
- Professional Service Corporations-Certain Health Care Facilities (e.g. hospitals, hospices, community mental health centers, long term care facility). -Licensed Provider Networks, including HMOs.
35
Specific State Issues(Not a Complete Statement of State law)
The following are generally viewed as not having a corporate practice of medicine restriction:
Alabama, Alaska, District of Columbia, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, and Wyoming.
36
Specific State Issues(Not a Complete Statement of State law)
In states without restrictions still watch out for:– Interference or control over independent medical judgment– Compliance with professional corporation requirements– Ethics rules concerning treatment of patients– Fee splitting and other similar restrictions– Referral restrictions– Liability for ownership– Check that additional restrictions on different professions
37
Looking Forward
Evolution of corporate practice of medicine:– Additional exceptions – ACOs– State legislative action
If physicians support change, will legislatures act?– Challenges to enforcement– Continuing evolution of AMA Principles
38
CONCLUSION
“The surer method of achieving the benefits of corporate medical organization without possible attendant evils would be by enactment of legislation specifically authorizing the corporate form but carefully regulating its activities so as to insure the highest response to professional ethics by the corporation as an entity and by its physicians”
Yale Law JournalDecember 1938