copyright ed young, PhD 1 LESSON 2 OVERCOMING EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL BARRIERS TO SCHOOL SUCCESS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Presented by THE NATURAL SYSTEMS INSTITUTE
Dec 27, 2015
copyright ed young, PhD1
LESSON 2
OVERCOMING EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL
BARRIERS TO SCHOOL SUCCESS
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Presented by
THE NATURAL SYSTEMS INSTITUTE
copyright ed young, PhD2
Understanding the Teen’s Brain, Cognition, and Intentional Processes
andLearning Mind Management
in Relation to Inner and Outer Worlds
copyright ed young, PhD3
I. Addressing Intentional Processes to Optimize Creativity, Productivity, and Self Modification
• Sensitivity of intentional processes to structural change– Dynamic relations between structures and intentional processes– Degrees and types of structure and their effects– Depth of personal change when there is structural change– Persistence and Transferability of personal change from a structured
to an unstructured environment
• Model of intentional processes– Elements of the model of intentional processes– Addressing the elements of intentional processes– Optimizing relations between structures and intentional processes
copyright ed young, PhD4
Cri
teri
a fo
r Ful
fillm
ent
I. Model of Intentional ProcessesI. Model of Intentional ProcessesPart I. Basic Elements of IntentionalityPart I. Basic Elements of Intentionality
World and External
Environmental Context
PerceptionReception
Retrieval ofInternal Representations
Assimilating or AccommodatingPrior Schemata and Schemes
Levels of MentalAssessment
Individuation
Physical and
Cognitive Hedonic
Tone
States of Incorporation
Envis
ioni
ng
FORESHADOWINGFORESHADOWING
MASTERINGMASTERING
Transcendence
Dec
idin
g
copyright ed young, PhD6
II. Model of Intentional ProcessesII. Model of Intentional Processes Part II A. The Perception and Cognitive Part II A. The Perception and Cognitive
Response to Structural ChangeResponse to Structural Change
Perception
Retrieval
Reception
Internal representation of environmental context:
Schemata for Social ‘Sets’
Assimilation Accommodation
Levels of Assessment
ExtrospectionExtroceptionExteroception
InteroceptionIntroceptionIntrospection
Individuation based on physical
and cognitive hedonic toneIntense Pleasure
Moderate PleasureMild Pleasure
Mild PainModerate Pain
Intense Pain
States ofIncorporation
Memory Patterns for
Prior Schemata and
Prior Schemes
Dis-IncorporationHeuristic Dis-IncorporationPseudo-Dis-Incorporation
Dys-
corporation
Pseu
do-D
ys-corp
oration
Pseudo IncorporationHeuristic IncorporationIncorporation
copyright ed young, PhD8
III. Model of Intentional ProcessesIII. Model of Intentional Processes Part II B. The Intentional and Behavioral Part II B. The Intentional and Behavioral
Response to Structural ChangeResponse to Structural Change
EnvisioningEnvisioning
Environmental
Environmental
ConditionsConditions
Time Time
PerspectivePerspective
Level Level
PerspectivePerspective
StrategyStrategy
ImplicitImplicit
OtherOther
DECIDING ADVENTURINGADVENTURING
Bodily ExperienceBodily ExperienceTimingTimingTemporal ExperienceTemporal ExperienceEmotional By-productsEmotional By-products
Re-engaging Dis-engagingComplete / Fail Exit
AdventuringAdventuring
MirroringMirroringCriteria for Fulfillment
Foreshadowing
REVISINGREVISING
STORAGE
MASTERINGMASTERING
Transcendence
copyright ed young, PhD9
I. TRAINING AND EDUCATING FOR MIND MANAGEMENT
• Structuring Settings, Situations, Tasks To Elicit Specific Levels Of Assessment, Parameters Of Awareness, And Domains Of Focus.
• Targeting and Eliciting Specific Mental Processes During Progress on a Task.
• Training in Conscious Elicitation and Use of Specific Mental Processes.
• Training in Self Reflexivity and Self Correction for Optimal Mental Performance Relative to Task Types.
copyright ed young, PhD10
II. Model of the Mind for Mind Management
DIRECTION
LEVEL
ORGANIZATION
COMPLEXITY
INTENSITY
PERSEVERANCE
INTEGRITY
BOUNDARY
CONTENT
MANAGEABLE PARAMETERS OF
INNER AWARENESSAND FOCUS
MANAGING THE CONSCIOUS MIND
MANAGEABLE LEVELS OF ASSESSMENT
MANAGEABLE PROCESSES OFENVISIONING AND ADVENTURING DIRECTED TOWARD DOMAINS OF
FOCUS
IMAGINATION or ABSTRACTION
IMAGINATION or ABSTRACTION
CONCRETE
VISUAL OR VERBAL
VISUAL OR VERBAL
CONCRETE
PERCEPTIONS AND CONCEPTIONS OF THE EXTERNAL /SOCIAL STRUCTURESPERCEPTION OF THE EXTERNAL,
IMMEDIATE PHYSICAL WORLD
THE BODY'S SENSATIONS
MIND'S FEELINGS AND CONCEPTS
PERSPECTIVES ON YOUR OWN PERSONALITY HISTORY AND FUTURE
PERSPECTIVES ON HISTORY AND THE FUTURE
EXTROSPECTION
EXTROCEPTION
EXTEROCEPTION
INTEROCEPTION
INTROCEPTION
INTROSPECTION
MANAGEABLE DOMAINS OF FOCUS
PRODUCT
INTEGRATING
Switchin
g
Domains
CrossFertilizatio
n
copyright ed young, PhD11
III. TRAINING AND EDUCATING FOR MANAGEMENT OF COGNITIVE OPERATIONS
• Structuring Settings, Situations, Tasks To Elicit Specific Cognitive Operations and Units Operated Upon.
• Targeting and Eliciting Specific Cognitive Operations During Progress on a Task.
• Training in Conscious Elicitation and Use of Specific Cognitive Operations.
• Training in Self Reflexivity and Self Correction for Optimal Mental Performance Relative to Task Types.
copyright ed young, PhD12
IV. BASIC COGNITIVE OPERATIONS
• Holding.• Shifting.• Copying.• Overlaying.• (Dis) Assembling.• (Re) Ordering.• Queuing.• Transmoding.• Chunking.• Subsuming.• Tagging.• Substituting.• Iterating.
copyright ed young, PhD13
DOMAINSCombinations of Operators, Operations, and Units are selectively involved in disciplines, domains, and tasks such as:
MathConstructionLanguage
Imagistic domainsChronicity-History
Experience
DOMAINS AND OPERATION SUBCATEGORIES:SYMBOLIC involves abstracting and concretizing.ANALYTICAL involves differentiating, comparing, contrasting, and reversing.COMPUTATIONAL involves addition, subtraction, and substitution.PERSPECTIVE involves micro-scoping and telescoping, temporal perspective,
magnification and contraction, value, and personal and impersonal.QUANTIFICATION involves label, dimension and measure
Interoception Introception Introspection Extroception
MODES OF ASSESSINGPERSPECTIVES
INTERNAL EXTERNALExteroception Extrospection
INNER AWARENESSPARAMETERS OF
AND FOCUS
Direction
Level
Intensity
Organization
Complexity
Perseverance
Integrity
Boundary
COGNITIVE OPERATIONS Searching Analyzing Taking Perspective Synthesizing Transposing Quantifying Symbolizing Computing Abstracting Concretizing
COGNITIVEMICRO-OPERATORSHoldingShiftingCopyingOverlaying(Dis)Assembling(Re)OrderingQueuingTransmodingChunkingSubsumingTaggingSubstitutingIterating
OPERATING ON THEFOLLOWING UNITS SUBJECTTO COGNITIVE PROCESSES
WholesUnits/PartsPatternsRelationsProcessesQualitiesQuantities
V. COGNITIVE OPERATIONS AND PROCESSES WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF MORE GLOBAL MENTAL PROCESSES
copyright ed young, PhD14
VI. The Gradual Construction, Elaboration, and Perfection of Cognitive Operations in Relation to Educational Systems:
Lattice Vs Lock Step
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 9OPERATION 8
OPERATION 7OPERATION 6
OPERATION 5OPERATION 4
OPERATION 3OPERATION 2
OPERATION 1
Language
Reading
Writing
Calculation
Visualization
Action
Perspecting
Collecting
Mathematics
SKILLS RELATED TO KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS
DECLARATIVE SKILLS
PROCEDURAL SKILLS
OPERATIONAL SKILLS
COG
NITI
VE
OPE
RATI
ONS
AND
KNO
WLE
DGE
ELA
BORA
TIO
NST
EP
BY S
TEP
copyright ed young, PhD15
VI. Lattice Vs Lock Step
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 9OPERATION 8
OPERATION 7OPERATION 6
OPERATION 5OPERATION 4
OPERATION 3OPERATION 2
OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
OPERATION 2OPERATION 1
Language
Reading
Writing
Calculation
Visualization
Action
Perspecting
Collecting
Mathematics
SKILLS RELATED TO KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS
DECLARATIVE SKILLS
PROCEDURAL SKILLS
OPERATIONAL SKILLS
COG
NITI
VE
OPE
RATI
ONS
AND
KNO
WLE
DGE
ELA
BORA
TIO
NST
EP
BY S
TEP
In lock step, the instruction proceeds whether the knowledge content or cognitive operation has been mastered or not. When pieces of the lattice are missing, the edifice can not be built
Unlearned building blocks prevents learningnext step. Also prevents integration with relatedsteps from otherdomains.
Integrating cognitive operations from different knowledge domains
copyright ed young, PhD16
I. The Final Factor Ensuring That Optimal Learning and Utilization Take Place Is Making Sure That a
Connection Is Made Between the Learned Concept and Skill and Real Life Situations.
• Imaging past situations with deficient understanding and action.
• Imagining such situations while also imagining using the new concepts and skills.
• Practicing the new concepts and skills in simulated situations.
• Applying the new concepts and skills in real life situations.
• Imaging past situations with deficient understanding and action.
• Imagining such situations while also imagining using the new concepts and skills.
• Practicing the new concepts and skills in simulated situations.
• Applying the new concepts and skills in real life situations.
copyright ed young, PhD17
II. Effective Application of Knowledge and Skills and Successful Implementation of Plans and Goals Requires Integration With Real
Life Projects Within the Culture’s Institutions
• Where and how does this knowledge and skill fit in the world, in the place where I will be working?
• How do I use this knowledge and skill when interacting with others in my work situation?
• How do I synchronize with larger, higher level projects and smaller, lower level projects?
copyright ed young, PhD18
III. INTEGRATING WITHIN AND ACROSS LEVELS OF EXTERNAL STRUCTURES
AND INTERNAL PROCESSES FOR GOAL ORIENTED COGNITION AND ACTION
• CORPORATE
• DEPARTMENT
• PROJECT
• TASK
• ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATION
• INTERPERSONAL INTERACTION
• INTENTIONAL-COGNITIVE PROCESSES
• INTENTIONAL-COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL-PROCESSES
copyright ed young, PhD19
IV. Meeting the Challenges of Uncharted Future Projects
Requires Integrating: Personality-Character,
Cognitive-Intentional Processes, andMental and Behavioral Effectiveness.
• Learning Strategies and KnowledgeAcquisition.
• Processes of Intentionality.• Cognitive Operations.• Personal Strengths of Character.
copyright ed young, PhD20
I. Adventuring, Without the Acquisition of Prior Knowledge and Using and Experimenting With a Combination of Prior Knowledge and Current
Experience Means Cognitive Growth Will Be InefficientThe confident or secure person who adventures, but without acquiring relevant knowledge means learning new cognitive and social skills will be inefficient. Without building on prior knowledge, growth is very inefficient.
Adventuring with a high
degree of uncertainty
without attempting to
acquire and use knowledge, experiment, or think and learn from mistakes
results in minimal growth
in cognitive and social
skills or character.
New territory
Now that I’ve accepted the challenge, I’d better know what I’m doing. Once I know little more about what I’m doing, I’ll be better able to meet the challenge, experiment and learn intelligently, use whatever feedback I can get, and master the new skills. Wow, I expect to grow a lot facing this new challenge, even if I have to make a lot of mistakes.
copyright ed young, PhD21
II. OPTIMAL CONDITIONS FOR MENTAL CHALLENGES:DEGREE OF RISK AND COMPLEXITY IS MODERATE,
ACETYCHOLINE AND ADRENALINE ARE MODERATE,SERONTONIN IS MODERATE,
DOPAMINE IS HIGH
LOW DEGREE OF RISK HIGH
LOW MENTAL EFFICIENCY LOW
OP
TIM
AL
N
EU
RO
TR
AN
SM
ITT
ER
S
SEROTONIN
SEROTONIN
ADRENALINE
ADRENALINE
OP
TIM
AL
DE
GR
EE
OF
RIS
K
LOW LEVEL OF COMPLEXITY HIGH
OP
TIM
AL
LE
VE
L
OF
CO
MP
LE
XIT
Y F
OR
TH
E
PA
RT
ICU
LA
R I
ND
IVID
UA
L
copyright ed young, PhD22
III. Types of Risk Takers Have Different Neuro-Endocrine States, Cognitive Processes, and Behavioral Strategies in Relation to Challenges
The high risk taker is impulsive, driven by adrenaline rushes, and low on information and planning, and rushes in, believing luck or personal power will suffice for the achievement of the challenge.
The moderate risk taker is calm, reasonable, high on information and planning and, while spontaneous, does not believe in luck or personal power, but believes that all factors must be considered and carefully and strategically executed for the achievement of the challenge. Believes in ability to cope with eventualities.
The low risk taker is anxious, and collects information and plans endlessly, believing anything bad that can happen will happen and that he/she will not have the personal resources necessary to cope with unforeseen situations that will prevent achievement of the challenge.
copyright ed young, PhD23
IV. Distracted by What Peers Might Think Reduces and Clouds Focus on Mental Tasks
Distracted by
clouded awareness
fears of peer reactions
Focus
on
Task
copyright ed young, PhD24
V. Personality, Adventuring, Experimenting, and Cognitive Growth
A high A high degree of degree of
uncertainty uncertainty when when
adventuring adventuring into into
unknown unknown future future
carries risk carries risk of ridicule of ridicule
and and rejection.rejection.
A high A high degree of degree of
uncertainty uncertainty when when
adventuring adventuring into into
unknown unknown future future
carries risk carries risk of ridicule of ridicule
and and rejection.rejection.
.
A modest degree of uncertainty
when adventuring into
unknown future carries little risk
of ridicule and rejection
A modest degree of uncertainty
when adventuring into
unknown future carries little risk
of ridicule and rejection
No uncertainty,
remaining in familiar ground, involves
no risk
Avoiding risk, so as to avoid ridicule or rejection, results in minimal growth in cognitive and social skills and character. Didactic knowledge may increase, but skill in application and creativity remain dormant.
Wow! What a challenge. I know I can make it, but I will have to really try, and learn, and grow, and risk failure. So what! The risk is worth it. So what if I fail and someone laughs at me or ridicules me! And, think how much I’ll learn.
Wow! This is a really big challenge. What if I don’t make it? Everybody will know I failed and I’m incompetent. They’ll laugh at me and ridicule me. I’d better not risk it. I’ll stay in my familiar territory.
The confident or secure person who adventures has the advantage of learning new skill and knowledge as well as developing character. Building of this, adventuring and facing risk becomes easier in the future.
OK, Let’s go. To hell with what
happens or what
anybody thinks!
copyright ed young, PhD26
I. Integration of Task and Time
Causes of Missed Deadlines:°Lack of Mature Time Estimation Skills°Habitual Lack of Time Calculation and Planning°Failure to Consider Coordination With Co-workers and Lack of Timing Sensitivity°Competing Tasks°Competing Interests, Lack of Interest, Lack of Motivation, Anxiety°Unanticipated Interruptions and Delays°Fatigue, Frustration, and Illness°Failure to Recalculate
Units of Future Time| | | | |Becomes | Hazy |With |Distance
Estimation of Time Per Task
Actual Time Taken Increases Beyond Expectations
copyright ed young, PhD27
Reserve Prospective Distant Personal Future Ongoing Personal Future
Distal Project Completion
Proximal Stages of Project
Present Strategies, Steps, Operations
INDIVIDUALTIME-TASK INTEGRATION
Reserve Prospective Distant Personal Future Ongoing Personal Future
Distal Project Completion
Proximal Stages of Project
Present Strategies, Steps, Operations
INDIVIDUALTIME-TASK INTEGRATION
Reserve Prospective Distant Personal Future Ongoing Personal Future
Distal Project Completion
Proximal Stages of Project
Present Strategies, Steps, Operations
INDIVIDUAL TIME-TASK INTEGRATION
Reserve Prospective Distant Personal Future Ongoing Personal Future
Distal Project Completion
Proximal Stages of Project
Present Strategies, Steps, Operations
INDIVIDUAL TIME-TASK INTEGRATION
PERSON A
PERSON B
PERSON C
PERSON D
COLLECTIVETIME-TASK-PROJECT
INTEGRATION
II. COLLECTIVETIME-TASK-PROJECT INTEGRATION
Integrating task with time for one’s own task and with the tasks of others and the overall project
Integrating task with time for one’s own task and with the tasks of others and the overall project
Integrating task with time for one’s own task and with the tasks of others and the overall project
Integrating task with time for one’s own task and with the tasks of others and the overall project
copyright ed young, PhD28
III. Addressing Cognitive Processes to Optimize Creativity, Productivity, and Self Modification
• Learning to manage the perspectives your mind takes on issues and problems.
• Learning to manage the way your mind focuses on issues and problems.
• Learning to manage the timing of perspective taking and mode of focus.
• Learning to manage the cognitive operations to be brought into play for working on issues and problems.
• Learning when and how to bring your mental processes into sync with the agenda and tasks of interdependent departments, projects, and co-workers.
• Learning to integrate temporal, intentional, and cognitive processes with external structures.