Copyright 2009 IDC. Reproduction is forbidden unless authorized. All rights reserved. David Senf, Director Infrastructure Solutions Group idc.com November 24, 2009 Changing Face of Virtualization
Mar 26, 2015
Copyright 2009 IDC. Reproduction is forbidden unless authorized. All rights reserved.
David Senf, Director Infrastructure Solutions Groupidc.comNovember 24, 2009
Changing Face of Virtualization
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 2
GDPGDP ProfitsProfits
Un-Un-employmentemployment
-2.4% -33.8%
8.4%
2009
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 3
Yet another forecast
Source: IDC Market Models
2009 Growth Rates by Category
-15.00%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
PCs Servers Storage Networking OtherHardware
Services Software Telecom
2009 2010
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 4
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 5
IT conundrum – tradeoffs inevitable
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 6
The Big Switch – Nicholas Carr
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 7
The Big Switch – Nicholas Carr
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 8
The Big Switch – Nicholas Carr
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 9
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 10
“capacity=demand”
The Big Switch – Nicholas Carr
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 11
So where are we now?
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 12
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 13
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 14
Utilization & Maintain
Real Estate
++++ Power & Cooling
Admin
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 15
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
20052006200720082009201020112012
$M
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Power and Cooling Avoidance % Saving
Cost avoidance through virtualization
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 16
OpexCapex
Virtualization by the numbers Top Savings
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Server HW Simplifiedmgmt
Power andcooling
Staff time Real estate Softwarelicensingsavings
Staffreduction
25% cost reductionover 12 months
across capex and opex
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 17
Business case development
Half of firms create formal business case to justify virtualization investments. As for the rest....
“I figured I had saved about $1.5M...[in] hardware costs... I didn’t go into a lot of the intangibles...”
-Pharmaceutical
“If I go to my CFO, he wants to see a couple of pieces of data, not a hundred.”
- Manufacturing
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 18
Server build decisions
Suggest virtual servers57%
Hardwarecentric11%
N=400
Virtualdefault
32%
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 19
How did we get here?
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 20
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Server capability and density soars – virtualization gets a leg up
Annual Cores Shipped
Annual CPUs Shipped
1 ap
p/s
erve
r
1 ap
p/b
lad
e
1 ap
p/C
PU
1 ap
p/c
ore
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 21
Sprawling Server InfrastructureOperational Costs Rise Dramatically
WW Spending on Servers, Power and Cooling, and Management/Administration
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 22
New Economic Model for the Datacenter Shifts to Automation Tools are a Requirement
WW Spending on Servers, Power and Cooling, and Management/Administration
Virtualization Management Gap
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 23
Zero sum game?“If we had not virtualized the number of servers would be significantly greater...Our carbon footprint would be greater…
We are spending less as a whole.”- Financial Services
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 24
New Economic Model for the Datacenter Shifts to Automation Tools are a Requirement
WW Spending on Servers, Power and Cooling, and Management/Administration
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 25
Considerations
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 26
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 27
Few VMs Profile
• IT-centric• Virtualize for hardware
savings• Low ITIL use• Resource mgmt• Lack of visibility• Manual processes• Physical & virtual tools / mgmt
separate• Lower VM / server rate
(e.g., 5/server)
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 28
Many VMs Profile
• Business-centric• Virtualize for competitive
advantage• High ITIL use• DR/HA• Resource monitoring /
measurement• Automate processes • Physical & virtual tools / mgmt
integrated• Higher VM / server rate
(e.g., 25/server)
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 29
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 30
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 31
Virtual machine adoption hurdles – past
TimeInst.Resistance
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 32
Cost/Budget
Tools
Virtual machine adoption hurdles – present
ExpertiseAvailabilityCapacity
Planning
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 33
5 things on order
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 34
1
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 35
From noun to verb
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 36
The Next Virtualization Milestones
Virtualization 1.0 Encapsulation Resource sharing Dynamic consolidation
Virtualization 3.0 Automation Service oriented Policy based “Cloud” Computing Variable costs
CAPEX
Operatio
nal Cost R
eduction
Virtualization 2.5 Unplanned HA/DR/back-up Workload balancing Virtual Clients
Virtualization 2.0 Mobility Planned downtime Virtual Clients
2013
Production Consolidation
24%
Availability39%
Virtual Clients15%
SW Development & Test 6%
Utility Computing16%
2006
Production Consolidation
49%
Utility Computing1%
Availability
11%
SW Development & Test
36%
Virtual Clients3%
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 37
Virtualization has lots of head room
Virtual PhysicalServer Type
Low HighBusiness Critical
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
App Dev Web App ITInfrastructure
DB/DW Email / msgng ERP/CRM/
Virtualized
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 38
2
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 39
The good, the bad and the ugly
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 40
Server Virtualization Impact:
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
3.0 3.3 4.35.4
6.3
7.0
7.6
8.0 VM Densities Nearly Triple
Cross Over
5%Shipments
20%Shipments
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 41
Virtualization Machine MovementMobility is on the Rise
VM Movement FrequencyVM Mobility Management • 80% report moving virtual machines across physical hardware
• 60% report using automation tools
• This highlights the evolution of virtualization and the desire to exploit increased functionality
• Illustrates movement towards more dynamic & flexible IT environment
Don’t Move VMs
Move VMsManually
Move VMsUsing Policy Tools
Move VMsManually &Using Tools
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 42
VM tools features we desire
17
21
22
22
26
26
27
32
42
44
47
56
Analysis/Troubleshooting
Deployment/Redeployment
Optimization
Capacity Planning
High Availability/Failover
Health Monitoring
Power Management
Load Balancing
Disaster Recovery
Security
Maintenance
Systems Backup
N=297: QC01MR. Which of the following systems management features or tools are you currently using to support your virtual servers? Please select all that apply.
1st wave
2nd wave
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 43
3
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 44
Action not reaction
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 45
N=255
Which of the following describes your organization’s business continuity planning status?
DR plan? What DR plan?
30%
25%12%
33%
We have a plan that is regularly tested
We have a plan,but it is not
regularly tested
Have no plan
Have anad hoc
plan
I think one area specifically that [virtualization] has changed is our ability to provide a better level of service [for] our DR and BCP. - Financial Services
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 46
Dial it up – ITIL?
12%in
2006
Process automation evolves on a scale from anti-inflammatory early on, to steroid down the road
23%in
2008
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 47
4
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 48
Resistance is futile
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 49
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
16,000,000
1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009
Total PCs installed in Canada from 1985 - 2009
50% of Canadian Firms Use & Plan to Use
Desktop Virtualization
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 50
PC Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)Opex makes up the bulk of spending
Q: What is the average breakdown of your PC expenditure?
Source IDC Virtualization Forum
• Deploy, Support, Train
• Operations
• Administration
• Hardware &Software
60%10%
7%
23%
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 51
5
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 52
Cloud?
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 53
Words Canadians use to describe cloud.....
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 54
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 55
04/10/23© 2009 IDC 56
Please contact me at:
David SenfDirector, Infrastructure [email protected]
http://twitter.com/Senformation
Questions or comments