Copyright, 1995-2002 1 Invitation to Research CASE STUDY: eBusiness Research Roger Clarke, Xamax Consultancy, Canberra Visiting Professor, CSIS, Uni of Hong Kong Visiting Fellow, Australian National University http://www.anu.edu.au/people/Roger.Clarke /... ...Res /70-eBus.ppt ebs, 16-20 January 2003
22
Embed
Copyright, 1995-2002 1 Invitation to Research CASE STUDY: eBusiness Research Roger Clarke, Xamax Consultancy, Canberra Visiting Professor, CSIS, Uni of.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Copyright,1995-2002
1
Invitation to Research
CASE STUDY: eBusiness Research
Roger Clarke, Xamax Consultancy, CanberraVisiting Professor, CSIS, Uni of Hong Kong
(now given way to dot.bomb negativity?)• Inevitable Turkey-Factor
Copyright,1995-2002
3
Characteristics of e-Business Instability of the Phenomena
• Rapid Change in:• Technologies and Processes• Applications• Participant Behaviour• Perceptions of Need
• Rates of Change still increasing• Directions of Change multiplying• To date, Limited Convergence, Maturation
Copyright,1995-2002
4
Characteristics of e-Business ‘Additional Confounding
Variables’
• Geographical Unboundedness• Cultural Variation• Ill-Definedness of Cultural
Boundaries
All compounded by Cultural Ignorance
Copyright,1995-2002
5
The Practice of e-Business ResearchThe Audience(s)
• Other Researchers• Research Grants Organisations
• Technology / Process Developers• User Organisations• Policy Workers• Investors
Copyright,1995-2002
6
Research in e-BusinessWhat Sponsoring Audiences Want
• New Technologies / Processes• Understanding About Them• Profit• The ‘Right’ Answers
or at least not the ‘wrong’ ones• The Right Motivation, Foci, Outcomes
Copyright,1995-2002
7
Intrumentalist Research in eBusiness
Alternative Foci• Technology / Process
What is it?• Applications
What do I do with it?• Adoption, Impediments
How can I make sure it gets used?• Impact
What are/will be first-order effects?• Implications
What are/will be its second-order effects?
Copyright,1995-2002
8
e-Business Research 1993-2000• 38 papers in the leading 'issues' journal, plus
37 in 5 selected (non-EC) research journals• in the issues journal:
• 25 theory, 1 survey, 8 case studies, 4 field studies
• in the 5 research journals:• 10 theory
11 surveys, 3 interviews, 14 case studies, 1 field study
• EDI as subject-matter:• 16 / 37 in the research journals• 0 / 38 in the issues journal
Copyright,1995-2002
9
Common Problems – Methods• Convenience Reference Theories applied unquestioningly
• Rogers’ innovation diffusion theory• Hofstede’s cultural factors theory• Williamson’s transaction costs theory
• Semi-structured interviews masquerade as case studies• Lone Cases, Shallow Cases, Pseudo-Cases• Consultancy as [Action] Research • Surveys are used as the sole technique even when:
• in-depth information is needed as well• in-depth information is needed instead
• Over-surveyed populations avoid responding
Copyright,1995-2002
10
Common Problems – Surveys
• Unclear Survey Objectives, and Survey Design Generally• Unclear Definition of Population, Sampling Frame, Sample• Convenience Samples, and Proxies instead of Principals• Principal-Agent Problem Uncontrolled (Unappreciated?)• Respondent Diversity Enormous and Uncontrolled• Highly Ambiguous Terminology Differentially Interpreted• Lists of ‘Likert or not’ Data, Masquerading as Information• Response-Rate Too Low• Response-Count Too Low• Non-Response Bias Inadequately Considered
Copyright,1995-2002
11
Common Problems – Survey Questions (Foddy)
• Answers to factual questions are often wrong• What Respondents say and do are often different• Respondents’ attitudes and opinions are unstable• Small changes in wording can produce major changes in
the distibution of responses• Respondents commonly misinterpret questions• The sequence of questions affects answers• The sequence of options affects answers• Open-ended and closed-ended ways of asking the same
question elicit different results• Many respondents who don’t know answer anyway • Cultural context affects answers
Copyright,1995-2002
12
e-Business ResearchCommon Problems – Research
Management• Inadequate Relevance to attract industry funding• Inadequate Resourcing to achieve the aims:
Research Techniques at the Boundary ofScientific and Interpretivist Research
A Taxonomy (5)
• Field Study• Questionnaire-Based
Survey• Interview-Based Survey• Case Study• Secondary Research
Copyright,1995-2002
20
Engineering Research Techniques
A Taxonomy (5)
• Construction of an Artefact• Conception (based on a body of theory)• Design / Creation / Prototyping /
Testing• Application
• Destruction of an Artefact• Testing• Application
Copyright,1995-2002
21
e-Business Research Particularly Suitable Research
Techniques
• Field Study / Observation / Case Studiescomplemented by Documents, Interviews, small Surveys
• Laboratory Experimentation:• Prototype Development• Prototype Usage • Product Usage, but by Real People, not Proxies
• Field Experimentation:• Metricated Trial Applications
• Surveys of tightly-defined and -segmented populations
Copyright,1995-2002
22
Research in e-Business Concluding Observations
• A Research Domain, not a Discipline• In need of the insights of multiple disciplines• Ill-served by existing bodies of theory• Breadth and depth are both needed, but
holism and integration are very challenging• A Research Method generally requires several
complementary Research Techniques• Relevance as Objective; Rigour as Constraint• ‘Technology’, Apps, Implications and Policy