This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
The SIPRI Military Expenditure Database includes data for 170 countries for the period 1988-2010.*
For information on the sources and methods for SIPRI data, including methods for calculating calendar year data from financial year data, for calculating constant price US$ figures, and for estimating missing data for countries as part of the world and regional totals, see http://www.sipri.org/research/armaments/milex/resultoutput/sources_methods.
This workbook includes the following worksheets:
1) Estimates of world, regional and subregional totals in constant (2009) US$ (billions), and in current (2010) US$b. for 2010.2) Data for military expenditure by country in current price local currency, presented according to each country's financial year.3) Data for military expenditure by country in current price local currency, presented according to calendar year.4) Data for military expenditure by country in constant price US$ (millions), presented according to calendar year, and in current (2010) US$m. for 2010.5) Data for military expenditure by country as a share of GDP, presented according to calendar year.6) Indicators of 'bracketing' for each country-year, indicating when a figure is considered highly uncertain or where it is a SIPRI estimate. This sheet also gives indicators of footnotes and other special notes for each country.7) List of footnotes by country.
*In addition, the former People's Democratic Republic of Yemen is listed, although no data is currently available for this country.
World and regional totals
Local currency, financial years
Local currency, calendar years
Constant (2009) US$ Share of GDP
Brackets and indicators Footnotes
The information in this document is the intellectual property of SIPRI. Under SIPRI's "fair use" policy, the data may be freely used for non-commercial purposes , including research, news reporting, comment, the production of educational materials that are not sold commercially, etc., provided that a) SIPRI is cited as the source of the data, with the citation: "SIPRI Military Expenditure Database 2011, http://milexdata.sipri.org" and b) no more than 10% of the entire dataset is reproduced.
Any commercial use of the data (whether more or less than 10% of the dataset), or any reproduction of more than 10% of the entire dataset, requires specific permission from SIPRI, for which a fee will normally be charged based on the cost of generating the data. Contact [email protected] for further information.
For the purpose of the above, 10% of the SIPRI Military Expenditure Database is defined to consist of 1,000 individual units of data, where a unit of data consists of a figure for military expenditure for one country in one year either in local currency at current prices (financial or calendar year), constant (2009) US$, current (2010) US$, or as a share of GDP, in each case together with relevant information contained in the bracketing, special note indicators and footnotes for that country and year; or an estimate of a world or regional total in constant (2009) US$ or current (2010) US$, together with the information contained in any bracketing for that figure.
Military expenditure by region in constant US dollars, 1988–2010Figures are in US$ b., at constant 2009 prices and exchange rates, except for the last figure which is in US$ b. at 2010 prices and exchange rates. All world totals and most regional totals include estimates for at least one country.Figures do not always add up to totals because of the conventions of rounding.Figures in round brackets indicate that more than 10% of the total figure consists of estimates for countries for which data is missing.The symbol ". ." indicates that data is unavailable, or that the world or regional estimate is considered too uncertain to be reliable.The symbol "xxx" indicates that none of the countries in the relevant sub-region (Central Asia) were indpendent at this time.
1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993World total 1441 1413 1339 . . 1108 1069Geographical regions
Africa 13.9 14.2 14.6 13.0 12.0 14.3North Africa 3 4 4 4 4 4Sub-Saharan Africa 10.6 10.7 11.1 9.4 8.0 10.1
Americas 583 577 547 481 507 487North America 549 543 520 457 482 458Central America & the Caribbean 2.8 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.5 3.6South America 31.2 30.7 24.4 20.6 21.1 25.5
Asia and Oceania 119 124 128 131 139 142Central Asia xxx xxx xxx xxx 0.9 0.9East Asia 88.4 92.4 96.8 100.0 107 108South Asia 18.3 19.2 19.3 18.7 18.5 20.3Oceania 12.6 12.3 12.3 12.4 12.6 13.0
Europe 673 648 579 . . 388 368Western Europe 317 318 320 317 306 296Eastern Europe 296 275 233 . . 59.1 52.5Central Europe 59.5 . . 26.5 19.6 23.1 19.0
Middle East 52.3 49.6 70.0 79.0 62.5 57.8
NB: Many of the figures given here differ from those published in the SIPRI Yearbook 2011. This is because the figures shown here exclude a number of countries included in the Yearbook estimates, but for which insufficient data exists to make meaningful estimates for the whole period 1988-2010. The excluded countries are: Afghanistan, Honduras, Iraq, Qatar and Vietnam. The estimates both here and in the Yearbook also exclude the following countries: Cuba, Equitorial Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, North Korea, Myanmar, Somalia, Trinidad & Tobago, Yemen (South), Yugoslavia (former) and Zimbabwe. This is due either to data being missing for too many years to make meaningful estimates, or to an absence of economic data to enable conversion to constant (2009) US$.
Front page
Figures are in US$ b., at constant 2009 prices and exchange rates, except for the last figure which is in US$ b. at 2010 prices and exchange rates.
Figures in round brackets indicate that more than 10% of the total figure consists of estimates for countries for which data is missing.The symbol ". ." indicates that data is unavailable, or that the world or regional estimate is considered too uncertain to be reliable.The symbol "xxx" indicates that none of the countries in the relevant sub-region (Central Asia) were indpendent at this time.
NB: Many of the figures given here differ from those published in the SIPRI Yearbook 2011. This is because the figures shown here exclude a number of countries included in the Yearbook estimates, but for which insufficient data exists to make meaningful estimates for the whole period 1988-2010. The excluded countries are: Afghanistan, Honduras, Iraq, Qatar and Vietnam. The estimates both here and in the Yearbook also exclude the following countries: Cuba, Equitorial Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, North Korea, Myanmar, Somalia, Trinidad & Tobago, Yemen (South), Yugoslavia (former) and Zimbabwe. This is due either to data being missing for too many years to make meaningful estimates, or to an absence of economic data to enable conversion to constant (2009) US$.
Military expenditure by country, in local currency, 1988-2010Figures are in local currency at current prices and are for financial years. Countries are grouped by region and subregion.All data are expressed in the most recent currency for each country.". ." = data unavailable. "xxx" = country did not exist or was not independent during all or part of the year in question.
Country Currency Financial year star 1988 1989AfricaNorth AfricaAlgeria b. dinars January 6.1 6.5
Libya m. dinars January . . . .
Morocco m. dirhams Special, see notes 7530 8408
Tunisia m. dinars January 200 222Sub-Saharan
Angola m./b. kwanzas January . . . .
Benin b. CFA francs January 11 9.1Botswana m. pula April 182 216Burkina Faso b. CFA francs January 14 17.6Burundi b. francs January 4.8 6.0Cameroon b. CFA francs January 45.5 48.2Cape Verde m. escudos January 366 . .Central African Rep. m. CFA francs January . . . .Chad b. CFA francs January . . . .Congo m. CFA francs January . . . .Congo, Dem. Rep. m. francs January . . . .Côte d’Ivoire b. CFA francs January 38.2 41.4Djibouti m. francs January 5520 5525Equatorial Guinea m. CFA francs January . . . .Eritrea m. nakfa January xxx xxxEthiopia m. birr July 1494 1741Gabon b. CFA francs January . . . .Gambia m. dalasis January 17.9 23.4Ghana m. cedis January 0.5 0.6Guinea b. francs January . . . .Guinea-Bissau m. CFA francs January . . 123Kenya m. shillings July 4021 5385Lesotho m. maloti April 44.1 75.7Liberia m. dollars July 26.5 . .Madagascar b. ariary January 9.3 9.7Malawi m. kwacha April 53.1 66.1Mali b. CFA francs January 14.3 14.7Mauritania b. ouguiyas January 3.2 3.2Mauritius m. rupees July 73 120Mozambique m. meticais January 33.5 58.9Namibia m. dollars April xxx xxxNiger b. CFA francs January . . . .Nigeria b. naira January 1.2 1.3Rwanda b. francs Special, see notes 2.8 3.3Senegal b. CFA francs January 29.6 30.5Seychelles m. rupees January 65.4 73.6Sierra Leone m. leones January 230 577Somalia m. shillings January 7918 4200South Africa m. rand April 8952 9685
Sudan m. pounds January 1.7 . .Swaziland m. emalangeni April 20.8 26.6Tanzania b. shillings July 14.1 16.1Togo m. CFA francs January 12834 13354Uganda b. shillings July 21.3 41.1Zambia b. kwacha January 0.7 2.3Zimbabwe SEE FOOTNOTE m. dollars January 0.7 0.9
AmericasCentral America and the CaribbeanBelize m. dollars April 8.3 8.8Costa Rica m. colones January 0 0Cuba m. pesos January 1274 1377Dominican Rep. m. pesos January 375 440El Salvador m. US dollar January 88.8 106Guatemala m. quetzales January 327 364Haiti m. gourdes April 10 11.6Honduras m. lempiras January . . . .Jamaica m. dollars April . . 180Mexico m. pesos January 2133 2713Nicaragua m. córdobas January . . . .Panama m. balboas January 103 102Trinidad & Tobago m. Dollars October . . . .North AmericaCanada m. dollars April 12336 12854USA m. dollars October 293093 304085South AmericaArgentina m. pesos January 1.6 45.8Bolivia m. bolivianos January . . 267Brazil m. reais January . . . .Chile b. pesos January 298 309Colombia b. pesos January 352 496Ecuador m. US dollars January 198 189Guyana m. dollars January 83.9 124Paraguay b. guaranies January . . 55.2Peru m. nuevos solesJanuary . . 0.2Uruguay m. pesos January 78 153Venezuela m. bolivares f January . . . .
Asia & OceaniaCentral AsiaKazakhstan b. tenge January xxx xxxKyrgyzstan m. som January xxx xxxTajikistan m. somoni January xxx xxxTurkmenistan b. manat January xxx xxxUzbekistan b. sum January xxx xxxEast AsiaBrunei m. dollars Special, see notes 359 363Cambodia b. riel January 2.5 4.8China, P. R. b. yuan January . . 44Indonesia b. rupiah Special, see notes 1936 2136Japan b. yen April 3700 3920Korea, North m. won January 3863 4060Korea, South b. won January 5952 6485Laos b. kip January . . . .Malaysia m. ringgit January 2241 2761
Mongolia m. tugriks January 900 850Myanmar b. kyats April 1.8 4.3Philippines m. pesos January 12356 13051Singapore m. dollars April 2492 2837Taiwan b. dollars January 188 211Thailand b. baht January 44.7 48.5Viet Nam b. dong January 792 2047South AsiaAfghanistan m. afghanis January . . . .Bangladesh m. takas July 10045 11080India b. rupees April 162 175Nepal m. rupees July 899 1077Pakistan b. rupees July 49.3 52.6Sri Lanka b. rupees January 5.3 4.5OceaniaAustralia m. dollars July 7642 8292Fiji m. dollars January 35.3 43.1New Zealand m. dollars July 1673 1349Papua New Guinea m. kina January 40.1 45.6Timor Leste m. US dollars Special, see notes xxx xxx
EuropeAlbania m. leks January 955 965Armenia b. drams January xxx xxxAustria m. euros January 1538 1561Azerbaijan m. manats January xxx xxxBelarus b. roubles January xxx xxxBelgium m. euros January 3734 3791Bosnia-Herzegovina m. marka January xxx xxxBulgaria m. leva January . . 1.7Croatia m. kunas January xxx xxxCyprus m. euros January 194 207Czech Rep. m. koruny January xxx xxxCzechoslovakia m. korunas January 29236 43784Denmark m. kroner January 15620 15963Estonia m. krooni January xxx xxxFinland m. euros January 1199 1275France m. euros January 32788 34351Georgia m. lari January xxx xxxGerman DR m. marks January 21647 . .Germany m. euros January 31515 32302Greece m. euros January 1145 1220Hungary b. forint January 54.8 53.2Iceland m. krónur January . . . .Ireland m. euros January 332 344Italy m. euros January 13190 14121Latvia m. lats January xxx xxxLithuania m. litai January xxx xxxLuxembourg m. euros January 78.4 74.2Macedonia, FYR m. denars January xxx xxxMalta m. euros January 17.3 17.3Moldova m. lei January xxx xxxMontenegro m. euros January xxx xxxNetherlands m. euros January 6035 6158Norway m. kroner January 18865 20248
Poland m. zlotys January 74 215Portugal m. euros January 968 1144Romania m. new lei January 3.7 3.8Russia b. roubles January 0.138 0.134Serbia m. dinars January xxx xxxSlovak Rep. m. euros January xxx xxxSlovenia m. euros January xxx xxxSpain m. euros January 5021 5550Sweden m. kronor January 30131 32447Switzerland m. francs January 4794 5042Turkey m. liras January 3.8 7.2UK m. pounds April 19290 20868Ukraine m. hryvnias January xxx xxxYugoslavia (former) m. new dinars January . . 6113
Middle EastBahrain m. dinars January 70 74Egypt m. pounds July 3873 3926Iran b. rials April 539 648Iraq b. dinars January . . . .Israel m. new shekels January 10918 11029Jordan m. dinars January 220 220Kuwait m. dinars April 577 643Lebanon b. pounds January 16.1 . .Oman m. rials January 589 601Qatar m. riyals January . . . .Saudi Arabia b. riyals January 50.1 47.8Syria b. pounds January 13.6 15.5UAE m. dirhams January . . . .Yemen b. riyals January . . . .Yemen, North m. rials January 5533 6030Yemen, South m. dinars January . . . .
Military expenditure by country, in local currency, 1988-2010Figures are in local currency at current prices and are for financial years. Countries are grouped by region and subregion.All data are expressed in the most recent currency for each country.". ." = data unavailable. "xxx" = country did not exist or was not independent during all or part of the year in question.
Military expenditure by country, in local currency, 1988-2010Figures are in local currency at current prices and are for calendar years, unless otherwise stated. Countries are grouped by region and subregion.All data are expressed in the most recent currency for each country.". ." = data unavailable. "xxx" = country did not exist or was not independent during all or part of the year in question.
Country Currency 1988 1989 1990AfricaNorth AfricaAlgeria b. dinars 6.1 6.5 8.1Libya m. dinars . . . . . .Morocco m. dirhams 7530 8408 8817Tunisia m. dinars 200 222 218Sub-SaharanAngola m./b. kwanzas . . . . . .Benin b. CFA francs 11.0 9.1 8.9Botswana m. pula 171 207 291Burkina Faso b. CFA francs 14.0 17.6 19.0Burundi b. francs 4.8 6.0 6.8Cameroon b. CFA francs 46.0 46.9 49.2Cape Verde m. escudos 366 . . . .Central African Rep. m. CFA francs . . . . . .Chad b. CFA francs . . . . . .Congo m. CFA francs . . . . . .Congo, Dem. Rep. m. francs . . . . . .Côte d’Ivoire b. CFA francs 38.2 41.4 39.2Djibouti m. francs 5520 5525 5530Equatorial Guinea m. CFA francs . . . . . .Eritrea m. nakfa xxx xxx xxxEthiopia m. birr 1273 1618 1625Gabon b. CFA francs . . . . . .Gambia m. dalasis 14.5 20.6 27.3Ghana m. cedis 0.5 0.6 0.9Guinea b. francs . . . . . .Guinea-Bissau m. CFA francs . . 123 . .Kenya m. shillings 4454 4703 5648Lesotho m. maloti 44.0 67.8 71.4Liberia m. dollars 25.0 . . 14.1Madagascar b. ariary 9.3 9.7 11.3Malawi m. kwacha 51.7 62.9 66.3Mali b. CFA francs 14.3 14.7 14.2Mauritania b. ouguiyas 3.2 3.2 3.2Mauritius m. rupees 63 97 137Mozambique m. meticais 34 59 79Namibia m. dollars xxx xxx 513Niger b. CFA francs . . . . . .Nigeria b. naira 1.2 1.3 2.2Rwanda b. francs 2.8 3.3 8.0Senegal b. CFA francs 29.6 30.5 31.3Seychelles m. rupees 65.4 73.6 79.2Sierra Leone m. leones 230 577 1369Somalia m. shillings 7918 4200 . .South Africa m. rand 8396 9502 10703Sudan m. pounds 1.7 . . 3.9
Swaziland m. emalangeni 19.8 25.2 37.6Tanzania b. shillings 7.1 15.1 17.0Togo m. CFA francs 12834 13354 13817Uganda b. shillings 15.1 31.2 45.9Zambia b. kwacha 0.7 2.3 4.2Zimbabwe SEE FOOTN m. dollars 0.7 0.8 1.0
AmericasCentral America and the CaribbeanBelize m. dollars 6.2 8.7 9.5Costa Rica m. colones 0 0 0Cuba m. pesos 1274 1377 1380Dominican Rep. m. pesos 375 440 529El Salvador m. US dollar 88.8 106 111Guatemala m. quetzales 327 364 505Haiti m. gourdes 10 11 13Honduras m. lempiras . . . . . .Jamaica m. dollars . . 135 197Mexico m. pesos 2133 2713 3568Nicaragua m. córdobas . . . . 161Panama m. balboas 103 102 73.1Trinidad & Tobago m. dollars . . . . . .North AmericaCanada m. dollars 12181 12725 13318USA m. dollars 293093 304085 306170South AmericaArgentina m. pesos 1.6 45.8 750Bolivia m. bolivianos . . 267 424Brazil m. reais . . . . 0.2Chile b. pesos 298 309 400Colombia b. pesos 352 496 658Ecuador m. US dollars 198 189 202Guyana m. dollars 84 124 142Paraguay b. guaranies . . 55 77Peru m. nuevos soles . . 0.2 4.5Uruguay m. pesos 78 153 312Venezuela m. bolivares fuerte . . . . . .
Asia & OceaniaCentral AsiaKazakhstan b. tenge xxx xxx xxxKyrgyzstan m. som xxx xxx xxxTajikistan m. somoni xxx xxx xxxTurkmenistan b. manat xxx xxx xxxUzbekistan b. sum xxx xxx xxxEast AsiaBrunei m. dollars 359 363 419Cambodia b. riel 2.5 4.8 12.4China, P. R. b. yuan . . 44.0 49.0Indonesia b. rupiah 1913 2086 2487Japan b. yen 3655 3865 4099Korea, North m. won 3863 4060 4314Korea, South b. won 5952 6485 7156Laos b. kip . . . . . .Malaysia m. ringgit 2241 2761 3043Mongolia m. tugriks 900 850 592
Myanmar b. kyats 1.6 3.7 5.2Philippines m. pesos 12356 13051 14544Singapore m. dollars 2427 2751 3266Taiwan b. dollars 174 199 219Thailand b. baht 44.7 48.5 58.2Viet Nam b. dong 792 2047 3319South AsiaAfghanistan m. afghanis . . . . . .Bangladesh m. takas 9104 10563 11143India b. rupees 152 172 184Nepal m. rupees 834 988 1114Pakistan b. rupees 47.3 51.0 58.6Sri Lanka b. rupees 5.3 4.5 7.5OceaniaAustralia m. dollars 7470 7967 8589Fiji m. dollars 35.3 43.1 45.2New Zealand m. dollars 1310 1349 1334Papua New Guinea m. kina 40.1 45.6 65.6Timor Leste m. dollars xxx xxx xxx
EuropeAlbania m. leks 955 965 990Armenia b. drams xxx xxx xxxAustria m. euros 1538 1561 1630Azerbaijan m. manats xxx xxx xxxBelarus b. roubles xxx xxx xxxBelgium m. euros 3734 3791 3847Bosnia-Herzegovina m. marka xxx xxx xxxBulgaria m. leva . . 1.7 1.7Croatia m. kunas xxx xxx xxxCyprus m. euros 194 207 322Czech Rep. m. koruny xxx xxx xxxCzechoslovakia m. korunas 29236 43784 41900Denmark m. kroner 15620 15963 16399Estonia m. krooni xxx xxx xxxFinland m. euros 1199 1275 1377France m. euros 32788 34351 35355Georgia m. lari xxx xxx xxxGerman DR m. marks 21647 . . xxxGermany m. euros 31515 32302 34960Greece m. euros 1145 1220 1486Hungary b. forint 54.8 53.2 58.4Iceland m. krónur . . . . . .Ireland m. euros 332 344 463Italy m. euros 13190 14121 14464Latvia m. lats xxx xxx xxxLithuania m. litai xxx xxx xxxLuxembourg m. euros 78.4 74.2 80.1Macedonia, FYR m. denars xxx xxx xxxMalta m. euros 17.3 17.3 15.7Moldova m. lei xxx xxx xxxMontenegro m. euros xxx xxx xxxNetherlands m. euros 6035 6158 6132Norway m. kroner 18865 20248 21251Poland m. zlotys 74 215 1464
Portugal m. euros 968 1144 1333Romania m. new lei 3.7 3.8 3.9Russia b. roubles 0.14 0.13 0.12Serbia m. dinars xxx xxx xxxSlovak Rep. m. koruny xxx xxx xxxSlovenia m. euros xxx xxx xxxSpain m. euros 5021 5550 5546Sweden m. kronor 30131 32447 36516Switzerland m. francs 4794 5042 5635Turkey m. liras 3.8 7.2 13.9UK m. pounds 19285 20474 21932Ukraine m. hryvnias xxx xxx xxxYugoslavia (former) m. new dinars . . 6113 5180
Middle EastBahrain m. dinars 70.0 74.0 81.2Egypt m. pounds 3989 3900 4484Iran b. rials 404 621 724Iraq b. dinars . . . . . .Israel m. new shekels 10811 11001 13310Jordan m. dinars 220 220 214Kuwait m. dinars 476 610 2585Lebanon b. pounds 16 . . 149Oman m. rials 589 601 742Qatar m. riyals . . . . . .Saudi Arabia b. riyals 50.1 47.8 61.3Syria b. pounds 13.6 15.5 17.2UAE m. dirhams . . . . . .Yemen b. riyals . . . . 9.7Yemen, North m. rials 5533 6030 . .Yemen, South m. dinars . . . . xxx
Military expenditure by country, in local currency, 1988-2010Figures are in local currency at current prices and are for calendar years, unless otherwise stated. Countries are grouped by region and subregion.All data are expressed in the most recent currency for each country.". ." = data unavailable. "xxx" = country did not exist or was not independent during all or part of the year in question.
Military expenditure by country, in constant (2009) US$ m., 1988-2010Figures are in US $m., at constant 2009 prices and exchange rates, except for the last figure, which is in US$m. at 2010 prices and exchange rates". ." = data unavailable. "xxx" = country did not exist or was not independent during all or part of the year in question.
AmericasCentral America and the CaribbeanNorth AmericaSouth America
Asia & OceaniaCentral AsiaEast AsiaSouth AsiaOceania
EuropeMiddle East
Military expenditure by country, in constant (2009) US$ m., 1988-2010Figures are in US $m., at constant 2009 prices and exchange rates, except for the last figure, which is in US$m. at 2010 prices and exchange rates". ." = data unavailable. "xxx" = country did not exist or was not independent during all or part of the year in question.
Brackets indicating uncertain figures and estimates1=round brackets (indicating an unsertain figure); 2=square bracket (indicating a SIPRI estimate)
† Figures for these countries do not include military pensions
‡ Figures for these countries are for current spending only (i.e. exclude capital spending)
§ Figures for these countries are for the adopted budget, rather than actual expenditure
¶ Figures for these countries do not include spending on paramilitary forces
‖ This country changed or redenominated its currency during the period; all current price local currency figures have been converted to the latest currency.
1=round brackets (indicating an unsertain figure); 2=square bracket (indicating a SIPRI estimate)
Figures for these countries are for current spending only (i.e. exclude capital spending)
Figures for these countries are for the adopted budget, rather than actual expenditure
Figures for these countries do not include spending on paramilitary forces
This country changed or redenominated its currency during the period; all current price local currency figures have been converted to the latest currency.
This country changed or redenominated its currency during the period; all current price local currency figures have been converted to the latest currency.
Other notes
‡ ¶
‖
†
§
‡
§
‖
‡‖
‖
‖
‖
§ ¶
‡
‖
§
†
‖
†
‡ ‖
¶‡
†
‡
§ ¶†
‖
† ¶†
†
†
† ¶
† ‖
† ‖
‖
‖
† ¶‖
§
¶§¶¶
‡
§
† ‖
Footnotes from the SIPRI Yearbook 2011, written primarily for the data covered in it (2001-2010). As the data is comparable over time the footnotes should, by implication, also be valid for the data for 1988-2000.
† Figures for these countries do not include military pensions‡ Figures for these countries are for current spending only (i.e. exclude capital spending)§ Figures for these countries are for the adopted budget, rather than actual expenditure¶ Figures for these countries do not include spending on paramilitary forces‖ This country changed or redenominated its currency during the period; all current price local currency figures have been converted to the latest currency.
Footnote references can be found in the brackets sheet1 The figures for Algeria are budget figures for more recent years. In July 2006 the Algerian government issued supplementary budgets increasing total expenditure by 35 per cent. It is not clear if any of these extra funds were allocated to the military.2 The figures for Libya do not include Development expenditures, which in 2008 amounted to 1,000 million dinar.3 Morocco changed their financial year in 2000. Previously it had operated a July-June financial year, which changed to January-December from 2001. The local currency figure shown for 2000 is the sum of the figure for FY 1999-2000 (5,754m Dirhams) and the figure for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2000 (8,210m Dirhams).4 It should be noted that the rate of the implementation of the Angolan budget could vary considerably. Military expenditure for Angola should be seen in the context of highly uncertain economic statistics due to the impact of war on the Angolan economy.5 Investment expenditure for CAR for 2005 amounted to 775 000 CFA. francs.6 Chad's military expenditure increased sharply after 2005 due to conflict in the east of the country, with exceptional military expenditure financed by oil revenues. Figures for 2006 are not available, but available information suggests a large increase over 2005, and a smaller increase from 2006 to 2007.7 The figures for the Democratic Republic of Congo do not include profits from extensive military-run mining operations. Until 1997 the DRC was know as Zaire.8 Figures for Côte d'Ivore are for the adopted budget up to 2003.9 Figures for Eritrea in 1995 include expenditure for demobilization.
10 The figure for Ethiopia in 1999 includes an allocation of 1 billion birr in addition to the original defence budget.11 The figures for Gabon exclude off budget spending financed by the Provisions pour Investissements Hydrocarbures (PIH), an investment fund based on tax revenues from foreign oil companies active in Gabon (see International Monetary Fund (IMF), Gabon: Request for Stan-by Arrangement-Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Relase on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive director for Gabon, Country Report no. 07/174 (IMF: Washington, DC, May 2007), p. 13.12 The figure for Ghana in 2001 is for the adopted budget rather than actual spending.13 The figures for Guinea might be an underestimate as the IMF reports large extra-budgetary spending for the military.14 An armed conflict broke out in Guinea Bissau in 1998, which led to a substantial increase in defence expenditure, especially in 2000/01. According to the IMF, the increase was financed by a credit from the banking system, and by promissory notes. Due to the conflict, no data data is available for 1999 and the consistency before and after this year is uncertain.15 Figures for Madagascar include expenditure for the gendarmerie and the National Police.16 Figures for Mali are for defence and security.17 Figures for Mauritania are for operating expenditures only.18 Figures for Mozambique include expenditure for the demobilization of government and RENAMO soldiers and the formation of a new unified army from 1994 onwards.19 The figures for Namibia for 1999 refer to the budget of the Ministry of Defence only. In addition to this the 1999 budget of the Ministry of Finance includes a contingency provision of N$104 million for the Namibian military presence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The figures for 2002 include a supplementary allocation of N$78.5 million.20 Figures for Nigeria before 1999 are understated because of the use by the military of a favourable specific dollar exchange rate.21 The figures for Rwanda for 1998 are from the official defence budget. According to the IMF there are additional sources of funding for military activities, both within the budget and extra-budgetary. The figures for 2005 and 2006 include allocations for the African Union (AU) peacekeeping missions. Rwanda switched from a January-December to a July-June Fiscal Year from July 2009, in accordance with the East Africa Community guidelines. A bridging 6-month mini-budget was enacted for the first half of 2009.22 Senegal's expenditure for paramilitary forces in 1998 amounted to 21 100 million CFA francs.23 The figures for Sierra Leone in 1998 and 1999 are not available due to the coup d'etat and subsequent civil war. It is not clear whether the data before and after these years are based on the same definition.24 The figures for Sudan are for spending on defence and security.25 The figures for Swaziland for 2008-2010 are estimates based on an estimated share of the Defence, Public Order and Safety budget, and are subject to considerable uncertainty.26 Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.27 Costa Rica has no armed forces. Expenditure for paramilitary forces, border guard, and maritime and air serveillance is less than 0.05% of GDP.28 Figures for Cuba are for Defence & Internal Order. The figures shown in table 5A.3 are for current US$, converted at the official exchange rate for each year, instead of constant price (2008) US$, due to the lack of reliable inflation data for Cuba. Data for military expenditure as a share of GDP are not shown due to the lack of reliable GDP data for Cuba.29 The figures for El Salvador do not include government spending on the Armed Forces Pensions Fund or the Pharmaceutical Centre for the Armed Forces. If included total military spending would, for 2009, amount to $232 million.30 The Haitian defence forces were disbanded in 1994 and replaced by the national police which also has coast guard functions.31 The figures for Honduras do not include arms imports.32 The figures for Nicaragua includes military aid from USA and Taiwan for the years 2002 - 2009 of 12.5, 16.9, 13.6, 11.1, 7.3, 28.8, 12.2 and 11.6 million gold cordobas, respectively.33 The Panamanian defence forces were disbanded in 1990 and replaced by the national guard, consisting of the national police and the air and maritime services.34 All figures for the USA are for financial year (1 Oct. of the previous year-30 Sep. of the stated year) rather than calendar year.35 The figures for Bolivia include some expenditure for civil defence.36 The figures for Chile include direct transfers from the state-owned copper company Corporacion Nacional del Cobre (CODELCO) for military purchases. These transfers increased rapidly between 2005 and 2008 owing to rising copper prices, then fell in 2009, also along with copper prices.37 The figures for Colombia in 2002 – 2007 include special allocations totaling 2.5 billion pesos from a war tax decree of 12 August 2002. Most of these allocations were spent between 2002-2004.38 Ecuador changed its currency from the sucre to the US dollars on 13 March 2000, at a rate of one dollar to 25 000 sucres. The current price figures for each year represent the dollar value of military expenditure at the market exchange rate for that year.39 The figures for Paraguay in 2003 are for the modified budget, rather than actual expenditure. Spending on military pensions is not included and for the years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to 208, 239.3, 271.7 and 293.9 billion guaranies respectively.40 The figures for Peru before 2000 are based on data from the Peruvian Ministry of Defence and are suspected to come from different stages of the budget process. The figures for Peru in 2005 do not include the transfer of 20% of gas production revenues from state-owned company CAMISEA for the armed forces and national police.41 Figures for Venezuela for the years 1991-1997 and for the most recent year, are for the adopted budget rather than for the actual expenditure. The figures for Venezuela do not include substantial extra-budgetary expenditure on arms imports.42 The figures for Kyrgyzstan include spending on internal security, accounting for a substantial part of total military spending.43 The coverage of the series for Turkmenistan varies over time due to classification changes in the Turkmen system of public accounts.44 The figures for Uzbekistan expressed in constant US dollars should be seen in the light of considerable difference beetwen the official and the unofficial exchange rates.
45 The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.46 The figures for Japan are for adopted budget before 2004 and from 2009-2010. The figures include the budgeted amount for the Special Action Committee on Okinawa (SACO) and exclude military pensions.47 The figures for South Korea do not include spending on 3 "special funds" for relocation of military installations, relocations of US bases, and Welfare for Troops. These amounted to 449.3 billion and 1048.8 billion Won in 2009 and 2010 respectively.48 The figures for Myanmar(Burma) are not presented in US dollar terms owing to the extreme variation of in stated the exchange rate between the kyat and the US dollar. Stated exchange rates vary from 6.076 to 960 Kyat/US$ (2003).49 The figures for Afghanistan are for core budget expenditure on the Afghan National Army. Military aid from foreign donors, which in 2009 included $4 billion from the USA, 16 times Afghanistan’s domestic military expenditure, is not included.50 The figures for India include expenditure on the paramilitary forces of the Border Security Force, the Central Reserve Police Force, the Assam Rifles, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police and, from 2007 the Sashastra Seema Bal but do not include spending on military nuclear activities.51 Figures for Pakistan are for current expenditure. They do not include spending on paramilitary forces - the Frontier Corps (Civil Armed Forces) and Pakistan Rangers. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, these totaled 16.7, 20.8 and 31.4 billion rupees respectively. Defence spending in the Public Sector Development Plan amounted to 2.3, 5 and 3.9 billion rupees in 2008, 2009 and 2010.52 The figures for Sri Lanka for 2000 do not fully reflect the special allocation of 28 billion rupees for war-related expenditure. The figures for 2009 include a 33 billion rupees supplemental allocation following the end of the civil war.53 For the years 1998–2002 Fiji's spending on military pensions amounted to roughly 3.5 per cent of annual military spending.54 For the years 2008-2010, development expenditure amounted to 6 million, 25.1 million and 0 million kina, respectively.55 The current local currency figure for Timor-Leste for 2007 is for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2007. Previous financial years, up to 2006-07, are from July-June; subsequent financial years, from 2008, are from January-December. The figures for military expenditure as a share of GDP for Timor-Leste are based on GDP data that excludes oil and gas revenues, which in recent years have been several times higher than Timor-Leste's GDP itself.56 The figures for Albania prior to 2006 do not fully include pensions.57 If the figures for Armenia were to include military pensions they would be 15-20% higher.58 The figures for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2005 onwards are for the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was formed in 2005 from the Croat-Bosniac army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Bosnian Serb Army of Republika Srpska. The figures prior to 2005 include expenditure for both the army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Army of Republika Srpska. Data for Bosnia and Herzegovina does not include spending on arms imports.59 NATO has provided figures for Bulgaria including pensions from 2006-2008: 1393, 1712 and 1749 million Leva for 2006, 2007 and 2008 respectively.60 The figures for Croatia for 2006-10 include sums allocated from central government expenditure for repayments on a loan for a military radar system. The sums allocated were 147.8, 91.4, 53.2, 54.6 and 55.2 million Koruny in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010respectively.61 The figures for the Czech Republic do not include military aid to Afghanistan or Iraq. Aid to Afghanistan was 18.7 million koruny in 2004 and 612.6 million koruny in 2007. Aid to Iraq was 1.1 million koruny in 2005.62 Czechoslovakia was divided into the Czech Republic and the Republic of Slovakia on 1 Jan. 1993. Figures in the table for constant dollars are based on subsequent CPI and exchange rate data for the Czech Republic, and should be interpreted with caution.63 Estonia merged their Border Guard Service with the National Police in 2010, and are no longer classed as a paramilitary force by SIPRI. This accounts for much of the decrease in Estonian military spending in 2010.64 The figures for France from 2006 are calculated with a new methodology due to a change in the French budgetary system and financial law.65 The budget figures for Georgia for 2003 are believed to be an underestimation of actual spending because of the political turmoil during the year.66 The German Democratic Republic (GDR, East Germany) ceased to exist in Oct. 1990 when it was unified with the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). The figures for GDR in constant US dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Germany, and should be interpreted with caution.6768 The figures for Italy include spending on civil defence, which typically amounts to about 4.5% of the total.69 The figures for Latvia do not include allocations for military pensions paid by Russia, which averaged 27 million lats per year over 1996–98.70 Due to a change in the way Lithuania reports spending on paramilitary forces, it is possible that the figures up to 2003 include spending on some forces not included from 2004.71 The definition of military expenditure for FYROM changed from 2006. Border troops were transfered from the Ministry of Defence to the Ministry of Interior Affairs and part of the military pensions, previously entirely excluded, are now included.72 Adding all military items in Moldova's budget, including expenditure on military pensions and paramilitary forces, would give total miltiary expenditure for 2005, 2006 and 2007 of 343, 457 and 530 million lei, respectively.73 Montenegro declared its independence from the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro on 3 June 2006 and was accepted as a member of the United Nations on 28 June 2006.74 The figures for Poland exclude some defence spending in other ministries, and additional domestic defence spending such as the Armed Forces Modernization Fund and some additional Defence R&D. Between 2004 and 2010 these additional sums varied between about 240 million and 640 million Zlotys.75 For the sources and methods of the military expenditure figures for the USSR and Russia, see Cooper, J., 'The military expenditure of the USSR and the Russian Federation, 1987–97', SIPRI Yearbook 1998: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998), appendix 6D, pp. 243–59. Up to and including the SIPRI Yearbook 2002, PPP rates were used for Russia for converting local currency figures to constant dollars.76 Montenegro seceded from the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro 3 June 2006. The figures up to 2005 are for the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (known as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia until February 2003) and for 2006 onwards for Serbia alone.77 Sweden changed its accounting system in 2001 giving rise to a series break between 2000 and 2001. This break means that the decrease in military expenditure between 2000 and 2001 is overestimated by 1.4 percentage points.78 Figures for Switzerland do not include expenditure on military pensions or paramilitary forces, or spending by cantons and local government. From 1990-2006, military spending by cantons and local government typically amounted to between 5-8% of the central government spending figures.79 From 2001, the UK moved from a cash based accounting system to a resource based system. The figures for the UK from 2001 are based on the "Net Cash Requirement" figures given in the Annual UK Defence Statistics, which are closest to the old cash definition. The Net Cash Requirement definition differ slightly from the cash definition used up to 2000. The effect on the figures for UK military expenditure is unknown.80 Former Yugoslavia including Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia, has a separate entry up to and including the year 1991. Constant dollar figures are not available due to the lack of reliable economic data for Yugoslavia and its successor states.81 The figures for Bahrain do not include extra budgetary spending on defence procurement.82 The figures for Iran do not include spending on paramilitary forces such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). No official data for Iran was available for 2009 and 2010, but a media report claimed that the budget for the Ministry of Defence and Army was 64,000 billion rials in 2009 and 90000 billion rials in 2010, while the budget for the IRGC was 48,500 billion rials in 2009 and 58250 billion rials in 2010. SIPRI has been unable to verify this report.83 The figures for Iraq are uncertain due to two main factors: first, they are budget figures that may be subject to revision due to variations in the price of oil; secondly, due to the high rate of inflation.84 Figures for Oman are for current expenditure on defence and national security.85 The figures for Qatar are for Defence & Security.86 The figures for Saudi Arabia are for defence and security.87 The figures for Syria in US dollars have been converted from local currency using the market exchange rate for the base year of 2008 of 1 dollar = 46.5 syrian pounds. Previously, Syria operated an official exchange rate of 1 dollar = 11.225 Syrian pounds, which was used in previous editions of the database. Syria abolished the official rate in 2007, moving to the parallel market rate that had previously operated unofficially.88 The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.89 The Republic of Yemen was formed in 1990 from the merger of the Yemen Arab Republic (North Yemen) and the People's Democratic Republic of Yemen (South Yemen).90 North Yemen merged with South Yemen into the Republic of Yemen in 1990. Figures in the table for constant dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Republic of Yemen, and should be interpreted with caution.
Iceland does not have an army/military and until the establishment of the Icelandic Defence Agency in June 2008 there was not a budget provided for defence affairs
Front page
Footnotes from the SIPRI Yearbook 2011, written primarily for the data covered in it (2001-2010). As the data is comparable over time the footnotes should, by implication, also be valid for the data for 1988-2000.
Figures for these countries are for current spending only (i.e. exclude capital spending)Figures for these countries are for the adopted budget, rather than actual expenditureFigures for these countries do not include spending on paramilitary forcesThis country changed or redenominated its currency during the period; all current price local currency figures have been converted to the latest currency.
The figures for Algeria are budget figures for more recent years. In July 2006 the Algerian government issued supplementary budgets increasing total expenditure by 35 per cent. It is not clear if any of these extra funds were allocated to the military.The figures for Libya do not include Development expenditures, which in 2008 amounted to 1,000 million dinar.Morocco changed their financial year in 2000. Previously it had operated a July-June financial year, which changed to January-December from 2001. The local currency figure shown for 2000 is the sum of the figure for FY 1999-2000 (5,754m Dirhams) and the figure for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2000 (8,210m Dirhams).It should be noted that the rate of the implementation of the Angolan budget could vary considerably. Military expenditure for Angola should be seen in the context of highly uncertain economic statistics due to the impact of war on the Angolan economy.Investment expenditure for CAR for 2005 amounted to 775 000 CFA. francs.Chad's military expenditure increased sharply after 2005 due to conflict in the east of the country, with exceptional military expenditure financed by oil revenues. Figures for 2006 are not available, but available information suggests a large increase over 2005, and a smaller increase from 2006 to 2007.The figures for the Democratic Republic of Congo do not include profits from extensive military-run mining operations. Until 1997 the DRC was know as Zaire.
The figure for Ethiopia in 1999 includes an allocation of 1 billion birr in addition to the original defence budget.The figures for Gabon exclude off budget spending financed by the Provisions pour Investissements Hydrocarbures (PIH), an investment fund based on tax revenues from foreign oil companies active in Gabon (see International Monetary Fund (IMF), Gabon: Request for Stan-by Arrangement-Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Relase on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive director for Gabon, Country Report no. 07/174 (IMF: Washington, DC, May 2007), p. 13.The figure for Ghana in 2001 is for the adopted budget rather than actual spending.The figures for Guinea might be an underestimate as the IMF reports large extra-budgetary spending for the military.An armed conflict broke out in Guinea Bissau in 1998, which led to a substantial increase in defence expenditure, especially in 2000/01. According to the IMF, the increase was financed by a credit from the banking system, and by promissory notes. Due to the conflict, no data data is available for 1999 and the consistency before and after this year is uncertain.Figures for Madagascar include expenditure for the gendarmerie and the National Police.
Figures for Mozambique include expenditure for the demobilization of government and RENAMO soldiers and the formation of a new unified army from 1994 onwards.The figures for Namibia for 1999 refer to the budget of the Ministry of Defence only. In addition to this the 1999 budget of the Ministry of Finance includes a contingency provision of N$104 million for the Namibian military presence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The figures for 2002 include a supplementary allocation of N$78.5 million.Figures for Nigeria before 1999 are understated because of the use by the military of a favourable specific dollar exchange rate.The figures for Rwanda for 1998 are from the official defence budget. According to the IMF there are additional sources of funding for military activities, both within the budget and extra-budgetary. The figures for 2005 and 2006 include allocations for the African Union (AU) peacekeeping missions. Rwanda switched from a January-December to a July-June Fiscal Year from July 2009, in accordance with the East Africa Community guidelines. A bridging 6-month mini-budget was enacted for the first half of 2009.Senegal's expenditure for paramilitary forces in 1998 amounted to 21 100 million CFA francs.The figures for Sierra Leone in 1998 and 1999 are not available due to the coup d'etat and subsequent civil war. It is not clear whether the data before and after these years are based on the same definition.
The figures for Swaziland for 2008-2010 are estimates based on an estimated share of the Defence, Public Order and Safety budget, and are subject to considerable uncertainty.Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.Costa Rica has no armed forces. Expenditure for paramilitary forces, border guard, and maritime and air serveillance is less than 0.05% of GDP.Figures for Cuba are for Defence & Internal Order. The figures shown in table 5A.3 are for current US$, converted at the official exchange rate for each year, instead of constant price (2008) US$, due to the lack of reliable inflation data for Cuba. Data for military expenditure as a share of GDP are not shown due to the lack of reliable GDP data for Cuba.The figures for El Salvador do not include government spending on the Armed Forces Pensions Fund or the Pharmaceutical Centre for the Armed Forces. If included total military spending would, for 2009, amount to $232 million.The Haitian defence forces were disbanded in 1994 and replaced by the national police which also has coast guard functions.
The figures for Nicaragua includes military aid from USA and Taiwan for the years 2002 - 2009 of 12.5, 16.9, 13.6, 11.1, 7.3, 28.8, 12.2 and 11.6 million gold cordobas, respectively.The Panamanian defence forces were disbanded in 1990 and replaced by the national guard, consisting of the national police and the air and maritime services.All figures for the USA are for financial year (1 Oct. of the previous year-30 Sep. of the stated year) rather than calendar year.
The figures for Chile include direct transfers from the state-owned copper company Corporacion Nacional del Cobre (CODELCO) for military purchases. These transfers increased rapidly between 2005 and 2008 owing to rising copper prices, then fell in 2009, also along with copper prices.The figures for Colombia in 2002 – 2007 include special allocations totaling 2.5 billion pesos from a war tax decree of 12 August 2002. Most of these allocations were spent between 2002-2004.Ecuador changed its currency from the sucre to the US dollars on 13 March 2000, at a rate of one dollar to 25 000 sucres. The current price figures for each year represent the dollar value of military expenditure at the market exchange rate for that year.The figures for Paraguay in 2003 are for the modified budget, rather than actual expenditure. Spending on military pensions is not included and for the years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to 208, 239.3, 271.7 and 293.9 billion guaranies respectively.The figures for Peru before 2000 are based on data from the Peruvian Ministry of Defence and are suspected to come from different stages of the budget process. The figures for Peru in 2005 do not include the transfer of 20% of gas production revenues from state-owned company CAMISEA for the armed forces and national police.Figures for Venezuela for the years 1991-1997 and for the most recent year, are for the adopted budget rather than for the actual expenditure. The figures for Venezuela do not include substantial extra-budgetary expenditure on arms imports.The figures for Kyrgyzstan include spending on internal security, accounting for a substantial part of total military spending.The coverage of the series for Turkmenistan varies over time due to classification changes in the Turkmen system of public accounts.The figures for Uzbekistan expressed in constant US dollars should be seen in the light of considerable difference beetwen the official and the unofficial exchange rates.
Front page
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.The figures for Japan are for adopted budget before 2004 and from 2009-2010. The figures include the budgeted amount for the Special Action Committee on Okinawa (SACO) and exclude military pensions.The figures for South Korea do not include spending on 3 "special funds" for relocation of military installations, relocations of US bases, and Welfare for Troops. These amounted to 449.3 billion and 1048.8 billion Won in 2009 and 2010 respectively.The figures for Myanmar(Burma) are not presented in US dollar terms owing to the extreme variation of in stated the exchange rate between the kyat and the US dollar. Stated exchange rates vary from 6.076 to 960 Kyat/US$ (2003).The figures for Afghanistan are for core budget expenditure on the Afghan National Army. Military aid from foreign donors, which in 2009 included $4 billion from the USA, 16 times Afghanistan’s domestic military expenditure, is not included.The figures for India include expenditure on the paramilitary forces of the Border Security Force, the Central Reserve Police Force, the Assam Rifles, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police and, from 2007 the Sashastra Seema Bal but do not include spending on military nuclear activities.Figures for Pakistan are for current expenditure. They do not include spending on paramilitary forces - the Frontier Corps (Civil Armed Forces) and Pakistan Rangers. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, these totaled 16.7, 20.8 and 31.4 billion rupees respectively. Defence spending in the Public Sector Development Plan amounted to 2.3, 5 and 3.9 billion rupees in 2008, 2009 and 2010.The figures for Sri Lanka for 2000 do not fully reflect the special allocation of 28 billion rupees for war-related expenditure. The figures for 2009 include a 33 billion rupees supplemental allocation following the end of the civil war.For the years 1998–2002 Fiji's spending on military pensions amounted to roughly 3.5 per cent of annual military spending.For the years 2008-2010, development expenditure amounted to 6 million, 25.1 million and 0 million kina, respectively.The current local currency figure for Timor-Leste for 2007 is for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2007. Previous financial years, up to 2006-07, are from July-June; subsequent financial years, from 2008, are from January-December. The figures for military expenditure as a share of GDP for Timor-Leste are based on GDP data that excludes oil and gas revenues, which in recent years have been several times higher than Timor-Leste's GDP itself.
If the figures for Armenia were to include military pensions they would be 15-20% higher.The figures for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2005 onwards are for the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was formed in 2005 from the Croat-Bosniac army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Bosnian Serb Army of Republika Srpska. The figures prior to 2005 include expenditure for both the army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Army of Republika Srpska. Data for Bosnia and Herzegovina does not include spending on arms imports.NATO has provided figures for Bulgaria including pensions from 2006-2008: 1393, 1712 and 1749 million Leva for 2006, 2007 and 2008 respectively.The figures for Croatia for 2006-10 include sums allocated from central government expenditure for repayments on a loan for a military radar system. The sums allocated were 147.8, 91.4, 53.2, 54.6 and 55.2 million Koruny in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010respectively.The figures for the Czech Republic do not include military aid to Afghanistan or Iraq. Aid to Afghanistan was 18.7 million koruny in 2004 and 612.6 million koruny in 2007. Aid to Iraq was 1.1 million koruny in 2005.Czechoslovakia was divided into the Czech Republic and the Republic of Slovakia on 1 Jan. 1993. Figures in the table for constant dollars are based on subsequent CPI and exchange rate data for the Czech Republic, and should be interpreted with caution.Estonia merged their Border Guard Service with the National Police in 2010, and are no longer classed as a paramilitary force by SIPRI. This accounts for much of the decrease in Estonian military spending in 2010.The figures for France from 2006 are calculated with a new methodology due to a change in the French budgetary system and financial law.The budget figures for Georgia for 2003 are believed to be an underestimation of actual spending because of the political turmoil during the year.The German Democratic Republic (GDR, East Germany) ceased to exist in Oct. 1990 when it was unified with the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). The figures for GDR in constant US dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Germany, and should be interpreted with caution.
The figures for Italy include spending on civil defence, which typically amounts to about 4.5% of the total.The figures for Latvia do not include allocations for military pensions paid by Russia, which averaged 27 million lats per year over 1996–98.Due to a change in the way Lithuania reports spending on paramilitary forces, it is possible that the figures up to 2003 include spending on some forces not included from 2004.The definition of military expenditure for FYROM changed from 2006. Border troops were transfered from the Ministry of Defence to the Ministry of Interior Affairs and part of the military pensions, previously entirely excluded, are now included.Adding all military items in Moldova's budget, including expenditure on military pensions and paramilitary forces, would give total miltiary expenditure for 2005, 2006 and 2007 of 343, 457 and 530 million lei, respectively.Montenegro declared its independence from the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro on 3 June 2006 and was accepted as a member of the United Nations on 28 June 2006.The figures for Poland exclude some defence spending in other ministries, and additional domestic defence spending such as the Armed Forces Modernization Fund and some additional Defence R&D. Between 2004 and 2010 these additional sums varied between about 240 million and 640 million Zlotys.For the sources and methods of the military expenditure figures for the USSR and Russia, see Cooper, J., 'The military expenditure of the USSR and the Russian Federation, 1987–97', SIPRI Yearbook 1998: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998), appendix 6D, pp. 243–59. Up to and including the SIPRI Yearbook 2002, PPP rates were used for Russia for converting local currency figures to constant dollars.Montenegro seceded from the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro 3 June 2006. The figures up to 2005 are for the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (known as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia until February 2003) and for 2006 onwards for Serbia alone.Sweden changed its accounting system in 2001 giving rise to a series break between 2000 and 2001. This break means that the decrease in military expenditure between 2000 and 2001 is overestimated by 1.4 percentage points.Figures for Switzerland do not include expenditure on military pensions or paramilitary forces, or spending by cantons and local government. From 1990-2006, military spending by cantons and local government typically amounted to between 5-8% of the central government spending figures.From 2001, the UK moved from a cash based accounting system to a resource based system. The figures for the UK from 2001 are based on the "Net Cash Requirement" figures given in the Annual UK Defence Statistics, which are closest to the old cash definition. The Net Cash Requirement definition differ slightly from the cash definition used up to 2000. The effect on the figures for UK military expenditure is unknown.Former Yugoslavia including Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia, has a separate entry up to and including the year 1991. Constant dollar figures are not available due to the lack of reliable economic data for Yugoslavia and its successor states.The figures for Bahrain do not include extra budgetary spending on defence procurement.The figures for Iran do not include spending on paramilitary forces such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). No official data for Iran was available for 2009 and 2010, but a media report claimed that the budget for the Ministry of Defence and Army was 64,000 billion rials in 2009 and 90000 billion rials in 2010, while the budget for the IRGC was 48,500 billion rials in 2009 and 58250 billion rials in 2010. SIPRI has been unable to verify this report.The figures for Iraq are uncertain due to two main factors: first, they are budget figures that may be subject to revision due to variations in the price of oil; secondly, due to the high rate of inflation.Figures for Oman are for current expenditure on defence and national security.
The figures for Syria in US dollars have been converted from local currency using the market exchange rate for the base year of 2008 of 1 dollar = 46.5 syrian pounds. Previously, Syria operated an official exchange rate of 1 dollar = 11.225 Syrian pounds, which was used in previous editions of the database. Syria abolished the official rate in 2007, moving to the parallel market rate that had previously operated unofficially.The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.The Republic of Yemen was formed in 1990 from the merger of the Yemen Arab Republic (North Yemen) and the People's Democratic Republic of Yemen (South Yemen).North Yemen merged with South Yemen into the Republic of Yemen in 1990. Figures in the table for constant dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Republic of Yemen, and should be interpreted with caution.
Iceland does not have an army/military and until the establishment of the Icelandic Defence Agency in June 2008 there was not a budget provided for defence affairs
This country changed or redenominated its currency during the period; all current price local currency figures have been converted to the latest currency.
The figures for Algeria are budget figures for more recent years. In July 2006 the Algerian government issued supplementary budgets increasing total expenditure by 35 per cent. It is not clear if any of these extra funds were allocated to the military.
Morocco changed their financial year in 2000. Previously it had operated a July-June financial year, which changed to January-December from 2001. The local currency figure shown for 2000 is the sum of the figure for FY 1999-2000 (5,754m Dirhams) and the figure for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2000 (8,210m Dirhams).It should be noted that the rate of the implementation of the Angolan budget could vary considerably. Military expenditure for Angola should be seen in the context of highly uncertain economic statistics due to the impact of war on the Angolan economy.
Chad's military expenditure increased sharply after 2005 due to conflict in the east of the country, with exceptional military expenditure financed by oil revenues. Figures for 2006 are not available, but available information suggests a large increase over 2005, and a smaller increase from 2006 to 2007.The figures for the Democratic Republic of Congo do not include profits from extensive military-run mining operations. Until 1997 the DRC was know as Zaire.
The figures for Gabon exclude off budget spending financed by the Provisions pour Investissements Hydrocarbures (PIH), an investment fund based on tax revenues from foreign oil companies active in Gabon (see International Monetary Fund (IMF), Gabon: Request for Stan-by Arrangement-Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Relase on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive director for Gabon, Country Report no. 07/174 (IMF: Washington, DC, May 2007), p. 13.
An armed conflict broke out in Guinea Bissau in 1998, which led to a substantial increase in defence expenditure, especially in 2000/01. According to the IMF, the increase was financed by a credit from the banking system, and by promissory notes. Due to the conflict, no data data is available for 1999 and the consistency before and after this year is uncertain.
Figures for Mozambique include expenditure for the demobilization of government and RENAMO soldiers and the formation of a new unified army from 1994 onwards.The figures for Namibia for 1999 refer to the budget of the Ministry of Defence only. In addition to this the 1999 budget of the Ministry of Finance includes a contingency provision of N$104 million for the Namibian military presence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The figures for 2002 include a supplementary allocation of N$78.5 million.
The figures for Rwanda for 1998 are from the official defence budget. According to the IMF there are additional sources of funding for military activities, both within the budget and extra-budgetary. The figures for 2005 and 2006 include allocations for the African Union (AU) peacekeeping missions. Rwanda switched from a January-December to a July-June Fiscal Year from July 2009, in accordance with the East Africa Community guidelines. A bridging 6-month mini-budget was enacted for the first half of 2009.
The figures for Sierra Leone in 1998 and 1999 are not available due to the coup d'etat and subsequent civil war. It is not clear whether the data before and after these years are based on the same definition.
The figures for Swaziland for 2008-2010 are estimates based on an estimated share of the Defence, Public Order and Safety budget, and are subject to considerable uncertainty.Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
Figures for Cuba are for Defence & Internal Order. The figures shown in table 5A.3 are for current US$, converted at the official exchange rate for each year, instead of constant price (2008) US$, due to the lack of reliable inflation data for Cuba. Data for military expenditure as a share of GDP are not shown due to the lack of reliable GDP data for Cuba.The figures for El Salvador do not include government spending on the Armed Forces Pensions Fund or the Pharmaceutical Centre for the Armed Forces. If included total military spending would, for 2009, amount to $232 million.
The figures for Nicaragua includes military aid from USA and Taiwan for the years 2002 - 2009 of 12.5, 16.9, 13.6, 11.1, 7.3, 28.8, 12.2 and 11.6 million gold cordobas, respectively.The Panamanian defence forces were disbanded in 1990 and replaced by the national guard, consisting of the national police and the air and maritime services.
The figures for Chile include direct transfers from the state-owned copper company Corporacion Nacional del Cobre (CODELCO) for military purchases. These transfers increased rapidly between 2005 and 2008 owing to rising copper prices, then fell in 2009, also along with copper prices.The figures for Colombia in 2002 – 2007 include special allocations totaling 2.5 billion pesos from a war tax decree of 12 August 2002. Most of these allocations were spent between 2002-2004.Ecuador changed its currency from the sucre to the US dollars on 13 March 2000, at a rate of one dollar to 25 000 sucres. The current price figures for each year represent the dollar value of military expenditure at the market exchange rate for that year.The figures for Paraguay in 2003 are for the modified budget, rather than actual expenditure. Spending on military pensions is not included and for the years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to 208, 239.3, 271.7 and 293.9 billion guaranies respectively.The figures for Peru before 2000 are based on data from the Peruvian Ministry of Defence and are suspected to come from different stages of the budget process. The figures for Peru in 2005 do not include the transfer of 20% of gas production revenues from state-owned company CAMISEA for the armed forces and national police.Figures for Venezuela for the years 1991-1997 and for the most recent year, are for the adopted budget rather than for the actual expenditure. The figures for Venezuela do not include substantial extra-budgetary expenditure on arms imports.
The figures for Uzbekistan expressed in constant US dollars should be seen in the light of considerable difference beetwen the official and the unofficial exchange rates.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.The figures for Japan are for adopted budget before 2004 and from 2009-2010. The figures include the budgeted amount for the Special Action Committee on Okinawa (SACO) and exclude military pensions.The figures for South Korea do not include spending on 3 "special funds" for relocation of military installations, relocations of US bases, and Welfare for Troops. These amounted to 449.3 billion and 1048.8 billion Won in 2009 and 2010 respectively.The figures for Myanmar(Burma) are not presented in US dollar terms owing to the extreme variation of in stated the exchange rate between the kyat and the US dollar. Stated exchange rates vary from 6.076 to 960 Kyat/US$ (2003).The figures for Afghanistan are for core budget expenditure on the Afghan National Army. Military aid from foreign donors, which in 2009 included $4 billion from the USA, 16 times Afghanistan’s domestic military expenditure, is not included.The figures for India include expenditure on the paramilitary forces of the Border Security Force, the Central Reserve Police Force, the Assam Rifles, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police and, from 2007 the Sashastra Seema Bal but do not include spending on military nuclear activities.Figures for Pakistan are for current expenditure. They do not include spending on paramilitary forces - the Frontier Corps (Civil Armed Forces) and Pakistan Rangers. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, these totaled 16.7, 20.8 and 31.4 billion rupees respectively. Defence spending in the Public Sector Development Plan amounted to 2.3, 5 and 3.9 billion rupees in 2008, 2009 and 2010.The figures for Sri Lanka for 2000 do not fully reflect the special allocation of 28 billion rupees for war-related expenditure. The figures for 2009 include a 33 billion rupees supplemental allocation following the end of the civil war.
The current local currency figure for Timor-Leste for 2007 is for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2007. Previous financial years, up to 2006-07, are from July-June; subsequent financial years, from 2008, are from January-December. The figures for military expenditure as a share of GDP for Timor-Leste are based on GDP data that excludes oil and gas revenues, which in recent years have been several times higher than Timor-Leste's GDP itself.
The figures for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2005 onwards are for the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was formed in 2005 from the Croat-Bosniac army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Bosnian Serb Army of Republika Srpska. The figures prior to 2005 include expenditure for both the army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Army of Republika Srpska. Data for Bosnia and Herzegovina does not include spending on arms imports.
The figures for Croatia for 2006-10 include sums allocated from central government expenditure for repayments on a loan for a military radar system. The sums allocated were 147.8, 91.4, 53.2, 54.6 and 55.2 million Koruny in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010respectively.The figures for the Czech Republic do not include military aid to Afghanistan or Iraq. Aid to Afghanistan was 18.7 million koruny in 2004 and 612.6 million koruny in 2007. Aid to Iraq was 1.1 million koruny in 2005.Czechoslovakia was divided into the Czech Republic and the Republic of Slovakia on 1 Jan. 1993. Figures in the table for constant dollars are based on subsequent CPI and exchange rate data for the Czech Republic, and should be interpreted with caution.Estonia merged their Border Guard Service with the National Police in 2010, and are no longer classed as a paramilitary force by SIPRI. This accounts for much of the decrease in Estonian military spending in 2010.
The German Democratic Republic (GDR, East Germany) ceased to exist in Oct. 1990 when it was unified with the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). The figures for GDR in constant US dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Germany, and should be interpreted with caution.
Due to a change in the way Lithuania reports spending on paramilitary forces, it is possible that the figures up to 2003 include spending on some forces not included from 2004.The definition of military expenditure for FYROM changed from 2006. Border troops were transfered from the Ministry of Defence to the Ministry of Interior Affairs and part of the military pensions, previously entirely excluded, are now included.Adding all military items in Moldova's budget, including expenditure on military pensions and paramilitary forces, would give total miltiary expenditure for 2005, 2006 and 2007 of 343, 457 and 530 million lei, respectively.Montenegro declared its independence from the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro on 3 June 2006 and was accepted as a member of the United Nations on 28 June 2006.The figures for Poland exclude some defence spending in other ministries, and additional domestic defence spending such as the Armed Forces Modernization Fund and some additional Defence R&D. Between 2004 and 2010 these additional sums varied between about 240 million and 640 million Zlotys.For the sources and methods of the military expenditure figures for the USSR and Russia, see Cooper, J., 'The military expenditure of the USSR and the Russian Federation, 1987–97', SIPRI Yearbook 1998: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998), appendix 6D, pp. 243–59. Up to and including the SIPRI Yearbook 2002, PPP rates were used for Russia for converting local currency figures to constant dollars.Montenegro seceded from the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro 3 June 2006. The figures up to 2005 are for the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (known as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia until February 2003) and for 2006 onwards for Serbia alone.Sweden changed its accounting system in 2001 giving rise to a series break between 2000 and 2001. This break means that the decrease in military expenditure between 2000 and 2001 is overestimated by 1.4 percentage points.Figures for Switzerland do not include expenditure on military pensions or paramilitary forces, or spending by cantons and local government. From 1990-2006, military spending by cantons and local government typically amounted to between 5-8% of the central government spending figures.From 2001, the UK moved from a cash based accounting system to a resource based system. The figures for the UK from 2001 are based on the "Net Cash Requirement" figures given in the Annual UK Defence Statistics, which are closest to the old cash definition. The Net Cash Requirement definition differ slightly from the cash definition used up to 2000. The effect on the figures for UK military expenditure is unknown.Former Yugoslavia including Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia, has a separate entry up to and including the year 1991. Constant dollar figures are not available due to the lack of reliable economic data for Yugoslavia and its successor states.
The figures for Iran do not include spending on paramilitary forces such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). No official data for Iran was available for 2009 and 2010, but a media report claimed that the budget for the Ministry of Defence and Army was 64,000 billion rials in 2009 and 90000 billion rials in 2010, while the budget for the IRGC was 48,500 billion rials in 2009 and 58250 billion rials in 2010. SIPRI has been unable to verify this report.The figures for Iraq are uncertain due to two main factors: first, they are budget figures that may be subject to revision due to variations in the price of oil; secondly, due to the high rate of inflation.
The figures for Syria in US dollars have been converted from local currency using the market exchange rate for the base year of 2008 of 1 dollar = 46.5 syrian pounds. Previously, Syria operated an official exchange rate of 1 dollar = 11.225 Syrian pounds, which was used in previous editions of the database. Syria abolished the official rate in 2007, moving to the parallel market rate that had previously operated unofficially.The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.The Republic of Yemen was formed in 1990 from the merger of the Yemen Arab Republic (North Yemen) and the People's Democratic Republic of Yemen (South Yemen).North Yemen merged with South Yemen into the Republic of Yemen in 1990. Figures in the table for constant dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Republic of Yemen, and should be interpreted with caution.
Iceland does not have an army/military and until the establishment of the Icelandic Defence Agency in June 2008 there was not a budget provided for defence affairs/military affairs. The Icelandic Defence Agency is responsible for maintaining defence installations such as the Icelandic Air Defence System, intelligence gathering and military exercises.”
The figures for Algeria are budget figures for more recent years. In July 2006 the Algerian government issued supplementary budgets increasing total expenditure by 35 per cent. It is not clear if any of these extra funds were allocated to the military.
Morocco changed their financial year in 2000. Previously it had operated a July-June financial year, which changed to January-December from 2001. The local currency figure shown for 2000 is the sum of the figure for FY 1999-2000 (5,754m Dirhams) and the figure for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2000 (8,210m Dirhams).It should be noted that the rate of the implementation of the Angolan budget could vary considerably. Military expenditure for Angola should be seen in the context of highly uncertain economic statistics due to the impact of war on the Angolan economy.
Chad's military expenditure increased sharply after 2005 due to conflict in the east of the country, with exceptional military expenditure financed by oil revenues. Figures for 2006 are not available, but available information suggests a large increase over 2005, and a smaller increase from 2006 to 2007.
The figures for Gabon exclude off budget spending financed by the Provisions pour Investissements Hydrocarbures (PIH), an investment fund based on tax revenues from foreign oil companies active in Gabon (see International Monetary Fund (IMF), Gabon: Request for Stan-by Arrangement-Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Relase on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive director for Gabon, Country Report no. 07/174 (IMF: Washington, DC, May 2007), p. 13.
An armed conflict broke out in Guinea Bissau in 1998, which led to a substantial increase in defence expenditure, especially in 2000/01. According to the IMF, the increase was financed by a credit from the banking system, and by promissory notes. Due to the conflict, no data data is available for 1999 and the consistency before and after this year is uncertain.
The figures for Namibia for 1999 refer to the budget of the Ministry of Defence only. In addition to this the 1999 budget of the Ministry of Finance includes a contingency provision of N$104 million for the Namibian military presence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The figures for 2002 include a supplementary allocation of N$78.5 million.
The figures for Rwanda for 1998 are from the official defence budget. According to the IMF there are additional sources of funding for military activities, both within the budget and extra-budgetary. The figures for 2005 and 2006 include allocations for the African Union (AU) peacekeeping missions. Rwanda switched from a January-December to a July-June Fiscal Year from July 2009, in accordance with the East Africa Community guidelines. A bridging 6-month mini-budget was enacted for the first half of 2009.
Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
Figures for Cuba are for Defence & Internal Order. The figures shown in table 5A.3 are for current US$, converted at the official exchange rate for each year, instead of constant price (2008) US$, due to the lack of reliable inflation data for Cuba. Data for military expenditure as a share of GDP are not shown due to the lack of reliable GDP data for Cuba.
The figures for Chile include direct transfers from the state-owned copper company Corporacion Nacional del Cobre (CODELCO) for military purchases. These transfers increased rapidly between 2005 and 2008 owing to rising copper prices, then fell in 2009, also along with copper prices.
Ecuador changed its currency from the sucre to the US dollars on 13 March 2000, at a rate of one dollar to 25 000 sucres. The current price figures for each year represent the dollar value of military expenditure at the market exchange rate for that year.The figures for Paraguay in 2003 are for the modified budget, rather than actual expenditure. Spending on military pensions is not included and for the years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 amounted to 208, 239.3, 271.7 and 293.9 billion guaranies respectively.The figures for Peru before 2000 are based on data from the Peruvian Ministry of Defence and are suspected to come from different stages of the budget process. The figures for Peru in 2005 do not include the transfer of 20% of gas production revenues from state-owned company CAMISEA for the armed forces and national police.Figures for Venezuela for the years 1991-1997 and for the most recent year, are for the adopted budget rather than for the actual expenditure. The figures for Venezuela do not include substantial extra-budgetary expenditure on arms imports.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.
The figures for South Korea do not include spending on 3 "special funds" for relocation of military installations, relocations of US bases, and Welfare for Troops. These amounted to 449.3 billion and 1048.8 billion Won in 2009 and 2010 respectively.
The figures for Afghanistan are for core budget expenditure on the Afghan National Army. Military aid from foreign donors, which in 2009 included $4 billion from the USA, 16 times Afghanistan’s domestic military expenditure, is not included.The figures for India include expenditure on the paramilitary forces of the Border Security Force, the Central Reserve Police Force, the Assam Rifles, the Indo-Tibetan Border Police and, from 2007 the Sashastra Seema Bal but do not include spending on military nuclear activities.Figures for Pakistan are for current expenditure. They do not include spending on paramilitary forces - the Frontier Corps (Civil Armed Forces) and Pakistan Rangers. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, these totaled 16.7, 20.8 and 31.4 billion rupees respectively. Defence spending in the Public Sector Development Plan amounted to 2.3, 5 and 3.9 billion rupees in 2008, 2009 and 2010.
The current local currency figure for Timor-Leste for 2007 is for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2007. Previous financial years, up to 2006-07, are from July-June; subsequent financial years, from 2008, are from January-December. The figures for military expenditure as a share of GDP for Timor-Leste are based on GDP data that excludes oil and gas revenues, which in recent years have been several times higher than Timor-Leste's GDP itself.
The figures for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2005 onwards are for the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was formed in 2005 from the Croat-Bosniac army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Bosnian Serb Army of Republika Srpska. The figures prior to 2005 include expenditure for both the army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Army of Republika Srpska. Data for Bosnia and Herzegovina does not include spending on arms imports.
The figures for Croatia for 2006-10 include sums allocated from central government expenditure for repayments on a loan for a military radar system. The sums allocated were 147.8, 91.4, 53.2, 54.6 and 55.2 million Koruny in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010respectively.
Czechoslovakia was divided into the Czech Republic and the Republic of Slovakia on 1 Jan. 1993. Figures in the table for constant dollars are based on subsequent CPI and exchange rate data for the Czech Republic, and should be interpreted with caution.
The German Democratic Republic (GDR, East Germany) ceased to exist in Oct. 1990 when it was unified with the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). The figures for GDR in constant US dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Germany, and should be interpreted with caution.
The definition of military expenditure for FYROM changed from 2006. Border troops were transfered from the Ministry of Defence to the Ministry of Interior Affairs and part of the military pensions, previously entirely excluded, are now included.
The figures for Poland exclude some defence spending in other ministries, and additional domestic defence spending such as the Armed Forces Modernization Fund and some additional Defence R&D. Between 2004 and 2010 these additional sums varied between about 240 million and 640 million Zlotys.For the sources and methods of the military expenditure figures for the USSR and Russia, see Cooper, J., 'The military expenditure of the USSR and the Russian Federation, 1987–97', SIPRI Yearbook 1998: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998), appendix 6D, pp. 243–59. Up to and including the SIPRI Yearbook 2002, PPP rates were used for Russia for converting local currency figures to constant dollars.Montenegro seceded from the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro 3 June 2006. The figures up to 2005 are for the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (known as the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia until February 2003) and for 2006 onwards for Serbia alone.
Figures for Switzerland do not include expenditure on military pensions or paramilitary forces, or spending by cantons and local government. From 1990-2006, military spending by cantons and local government typically amounted to between 5-8% of the central government spending figures.From 2001, the UK moved from a cash based accounting system to a resource based system. The figures for the UK from 2001 are based on the "Net Cash Requirement" figures given in the Annual UK Defence Statistics, which are closest to the old cash definition. The Net Cash Requirement definition differ slightly from the cash definition used up to 2000. The effect on the figures for UK military expenditure is unknown.Former Yugoslavia including Croatia, Macedonia and Slovenia, has a separate entry up to and including the year 1991. Constant dollar figures are not available due to the lack of reliable economic data for Yugoslavia and its successor states.
The figures for Iran do not include spending on paramilitary forces such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). No official data for Iran was available for 2009 and 2010, but a media report claimed that the budget for the Ministry of Defence and Army was 64,000 billion rials in 2009 and 90000 billion rials in 2010, while the budget for the IRGC was 48,500 billion rials in 2009 and 58250 billion rials in 2010. SIPRI has been unable to verify this report.
The figures for Syria in US dollars have been converted from local currency using the market exchange rate for the base year of 2008 of 1 dollar = 46.5 syrian pounds. Previously, Syria operated an official exchange rate of 1 dollar = 11.225 Syrian pounds, which was used in previous editions of the database. Syria abolished the official rate in 2007, moving to the parallel market rate that had previously operated unofficially.The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.
North Yemen merged with South Yemen into the Republic of Yemen in 1990. Figures in the table for constant dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Republic of Yemen, and should be interpreted with caution.
military affairs. The Icelandic Defence Agency is responsible for maintaining defence installations such as the Icelandic Air Defence System, intelligence gathering and military exercises.”
Morocco changed their financial year in 2000. Previously it had operated a July-June financial year, which changed to January-December from 2001. The local currency figure shown for 2000 is the sum of the figure for FY 1999-2000 (5,754m Dirhams) and the figure for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2000 (8,210m Dirhams).
The figures for Gabon exclude off budget spending financed by the Provisions pour Investissements Hydrocarbures (PIH), an investment fund based on tax revenues from foreign oil companies active in Gabon (see International Monetary Fund (IMF), Gabon: Request for Stan-by Arrangement-Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Relase on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive director for Gabon, Country Report no. 07/174 (IMF: Washington, DC, May 2007), p. 13.
An armed conflict broke out in Guinea Bissau in 1998, which led to a substantial increase in defence expenditure, especially in 2000/01. According to the IMF, the increase was financed by a credit from the banking system, and by promissory notes. Due to the conflict, no data data is available for 1999 and the consistency before and after this year is uncertain.
The figures for Namibia for 1999 refer to the budget of the Ministry of Defence only. In addition to this the 1999 budget of the Ministry of Finance includes a contingency provision of N$104 million for the Namibian military presence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The figures for 2002 include a supplementary allocation of N$78.5 million.
The figures for Rwanda for 1998 are from the official defence budget. According to the IMF there are additional sources of funding for military activities, both within the budget and extra-budgetary. The figures for 2005 and 2006 include allocations for the African Union (AU) peacekeeping missions. Rwanda switched from a January-December to a July-June Fiscal Year from July 2009, in accordance with the East Africa Community guidelines. A bridging 6-month mini-budget was enacted for the first half of 2009.
Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
Figures for Cuba are for Defence & Internal Order. The figures shown in table 5A.3 are for current US$, converted at the official exchange rate for each year, instead of constant price (2008) US$, due to the lack of reliable inflation data for Cuba. Data for military expenditure as a share of GDP are not shown due to the lack of reliable GDP data for Cuba.
The figures for Peru before 2000 are based on data from the Peruvian Ministry of Defence and are suspected to come from different stages of the budget process. The figures for Peru in 2005 do not include the transfer of 20% of gas production revenues from state-owned company CAMISEA for the armed forces and national police.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.
Figures for Pakistan are for current expenditure. They do not include spending on paramilitary forces - the Frontier Corps (Civil Armed Forces) and Pakistan Rangers. For 2008, 2009 and 2010, these totaled 16.7, 20.8 and 31.4 billion rupees respectively. Defence spending in the Public Sector Development Plan amounted to 2.3, 5 and 3.9 billion rupees in 2008, 2009 and 2010.
The current local currency figure for Timor-Leste for 2007 is for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2007. Previous financial years, up to 2006-07, are from July-June; subsequent financial years, from 2008, are from January-December. The figures for military expenditure as a share of GDP for Timor-Leste are based on GDP data that excludes oil and gas revenues, which in recent years have been several times higher than Timor-Leste's GDP itself.
The figures for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2005 onwards are for the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was formed in 2005 from the Croat-Bosniac army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Bosnian Serb Army of Republika Srpska. The figures prior to 2005 include expenditure for both the army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Army of Republika Srpska. Data for Bosnia and Herzegovina does not include spending on arms imports.
The German Democratic Republic (GDR, East Germany) ceased to exist in Oct. 1990 when it was unified with the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). The figures for GDR in constant US dollars are based on subsequent price and exchange rate data for the united Germany, and should be interpreted with caution.
For the sources and methods of the military expenditure figures for the USSR and Russia, see Cooper, J., 'The military expenditure of the USSR and the Russian Federation, 1987–97', SIPRI Yearbook 1998: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998), appendix 6D, pp. 243–59. Up to and including the SIPRI Yearbook 2002, PPP rates were used for Russia for converting local currency figures to constant dollars.
From 2001, the UK moved from a cash based accounting system to a resource based system. The figures for the UK from 2001 are based on the "Net Cash Requirement" figures given in the Annual UK Defence Statistics, which are closest to the old cash definition. The Net Cash Requirement definition differ slightly from the cash definition used up to 2000. The effect on the figures for UK military expenditure is unknown.
The figures for Iran do not include spending on paramilitary forces such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). No official data for Iran was available for 2009 and 2010, but a media report claimed that the budget for the Ministry of Defence and Army was 64,000 billion rials in 2009 and 90000 billion rials in 2010, while the budget for the IRGC was 48,500 billion rials in 2009 and 58250 billion rials in 2010. SIPRI has been unable to verify this report.
The figures for Syria in US dollars have been converted from local currency using the market exchange rate for the base year of 2008 of 1 dollar = 46.5 syrian pounds. Previously, Syria operated an official exchange rate of 1 dollar = 11.225 Syrian pounds, which was used in previous editions of the database. Syria abolished the official rate in 2007, moving to the parallel market rate that had previously operated unofficially.The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.
military affairs. The Icelandic Defence Agency is responsible for maintaining defence installations such as the Icelandic Air Defence System, intelligence gathering and military exercises.”
The figures for Gabon exclude off budget spending financed by the Provisions pour Investissements Hydrocarbures (PIH), an investment fund based on tax revenues from foreign oil companies active in Gabon (see International Monetary Fund (IMF), Gabon: Request for Stan-by Arrangement-Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Relase on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive director for Gabon, Country Report no. 07/174 (IMF: Washington, DC, May 2007), p. 13.
The figures for Rwanda for 1998 are from the official defence budget. According to the IMF there are additional sources of funding for military activities, both within the budget and extra-budgetary. The figures for 2005 and 2006 include allocations for the African Union (AU) peacekeeping missions. Rwanda switched from a January-December to a July-June Fiscal Year from July 2009, in accordance with the East Africa Community guidelines. A bridging 6-month mini-budget was enacted for the first half of 2009.
Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.
The current local currency figure for Timor-Leste for 2007 is for a special 6-month financial year from July-December 2007. Previous financial years, up to 2006-07, are from July-June; subsequent financial years, from 2008, are from January-December. The figures for military expenditure as a share of GDP for Timor-Leste are based on GDP data that excludes oil and gas revenues, which in recent years have been several times higher than Timor-Leste's GDP itself.
The figures for Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2005 onwards are for the armed forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which was formed in 2005 from the Croat-Bosniac army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Bosnian Serb Army of Republika Srpska. The figures prior to 2005 include expenditure for both the army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Army of Republika Srpska. Data for Bosnia and Herzegovina does not include spending on arms imports.
For the sources and methods of the military expenditure figures for the USSR and Russia, see Cooper, J., 'The military expenditure of the USSR and the Russian Federation, 1987–97', SIPRI Yearbook 1998: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1998), appendix 6D, pp. 243–59. Up to and including the SIPRI Yearbook 2002, PPP rates were used for Russia for converting local currency figures to constant dollars.
From 2001, the UK moved from a cash based accounting system to a resource based system. The figures for the UK from 2001 are based on the "Net Cash Requirement" figures given in the Annual UK Defence Statistics, which are closest to the old cash definition. The Net Cash Requirement definition differ slightly from the cash definition used up to 2000. The effect on the figures for UK military expenditure is unknown.
The figures for Iran do not include spending on paramilitary forces such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). No official data for Iran was available for 2009 and 2010, but a media report claimed that the budget for the Ministry of Defence and Army was 64,000 billion rials in 2009 and 90000 billion rials in 2010, while the budget for the IRGC was 48,500 billion rials in 2009 and 58250 billion rials in 2010. SIPRI has been unable to verify this report.
The figures for Syria in US dollars have been converted from local currency using the market exchange rate for the base year of 2008 of 1 dollar = 46.5 syrian pounds. Previously, Syria operated an official exchange rate of 1 dollar = 11.225 Syrian pounds, which was used in previous editions of the database. Syria abolished the official rate in 2007, moving to the parallel market rate that had previously operated unofficially.The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.
The figures for Gabon exclude off budget spending financed by the Provisions pour Investissements Hydrocarbures (PIH), an investment fund based on tax revenues from foreign oil companies active in Gabon (see International Monetary Fund (IMF), Gabon: Request for Stan-by Arrangement-Staff Report; Staff Statement; Press Relase on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive director for Gabon, Country Report no. 07/174 (IMF: Washington, DC, May 2007), p. 13.
The figures for Rwanda for 1998 are from the official defence budget. According to the IMF there are additional sources of funding for military activities, both within the budget and extra-budgetary. The figures for 2005 and 2006 include allocations for the African Union (AU) peacekeeping missions. Rwanda switched from a January-December to a July-June Fiscal Year from July 2009, in accordance with the East Africa Community guidelines. A bridging 6-month mini-budget was enacted for the first half of 2009.
Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.
The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.
Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.
The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.
Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.
The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.
Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.
The military expenditure of the United Arab Emirates is uncertain and lacking in transparency. The only available source of data is from IMF Staff Country Reports, and IMF Government Finance Statistics. The Country Reports include two lines relating to military expenditure: The "Goods and Services" expenditure of the Defence and Interior Ministries (which does not include military wages, salaries and pensions), and "Abu Dhabi Federal Services", which the reports say are "mainly" defence and security expenditures. The Gvernment Finance Statistics give only the Goods and Services figures. The SIPRI figures are estimated as 80% of the "Abu Dhabi Federal Services" item, plus 100% of the "Goods and services" figures. The latter item is estimated for 2006-10 assuming a constant real value.
Zimbabwe abandoned the Zimbabwean dollar in April 2009 and now mainly uses the US dollar. Local currency figures for Zimbabwe are given in Zimbabwean dollars up to 2006, and in US$ from 2010. Due to lack of meaningful price data in 2008 due to hyperinflation, it is not possible to provide a single constant price series for Zimbabwe. The constant dollar figures are therefore given in constant 2005 US$ up to 2006, and in constant 2009 US$ for 2010. These two series may NOT be connected. The figures for Zimbabwe in general should be used with caution due to an extreme level of inflation in the country. Zimbabwe changed currencies in 2006 from the Zimbabwean dollar to the new Zimbabwean dollar at the rate of New Z$1= Z$1 000, and figures up to 2006 have been converted to the new currency. The figure in 1999 includes a supplementary allocation of New Z$ 1.8 million.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.
The figures for China are for estimated total military expenditure, including estimates for items not included in the official defence budget. On the estimates in local currency and as share of GDP for the period 1989-98, see Shaoguang Wang, The military expenditure of China, 1989 to 98, SIPRI Yearbook 1999: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1999), pp. 349. The estimates for the years 1999-2010 are based on: publicly-available figures for official military expenditure and for certain other items; estimates based on official data and Prof. Wang's methodology for others; for the most recent years, where no official data is available for certain items, estimates are based on either the percentage change in official military expenditure, recent trends in spending in the same category, and in the case of the commercial earnings of the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), on the assumption of a gradual decrease.