Page 1
1
COPOLYMERIZATION OF ANILINE WITH P-PHENYLENEDIAMINE IN AN ACETIC
ACID MEDIUM
Angelo H. Durgaryan1, Narine A. Durgaryan, Rima H. Arakelyan, Naghash A. Miraqyan
(Yerevan State University, Alex Manoogian 1, Yerevan, 375025, Republic of Armenia)
Abstract
The oxidative copolymerization of aniline with p-phenylenediamine in an acetic acid medium has been
investigated for the first time. It has been determined that as a result of copolymerization, a polymer having a
structure analogous to the polyaniline called emeraldine is formed. The obtained copolymer doped with 3N
hydrochloric acid has an electrical conductivity five times higher than that of polyaniline prepared by the
usual method. Aniline polymerization proceeds more slowly at 273 K under the same copolymerization
conditions and the obtained polymer has low conductivity. However, in a mixture of acetic acid-methanol,
the reaction proceeds faster and the obtained polymer has a conductivity almost equal to that of emeraldine.
It has been observed that the conductivity of polymers doped with formic acid is lower than that of polymers
obtained by doping with hydrochloric acid by 2 orders of magnitude.
Keywords: polymer synthesis and molecular engineering, copolymerization, emeraldine,
p- phenylenediamine, conductivity.
1 E-mail – [email protected]
Page 2
2
Introduction
Among the electroactive polymers, the emeraldine form of polyaniline (PANI) attracts intense interest
[1,2]. PANI occupies a particular place among the electroactive conjugated polymers owing to its
environmental stability, easy and cheap method of preparation and its unique properties. It is extensively
used in various fields of technology [3-14]. To improve the properties of PANI, studies of aniline
copolymerization with different monomers have been conducted [12-19]; however, the conductivity of the
obtained copolymers is inferior to that of PANI in spite of high solubility.
According to the literature data, copolymer [20] is formed during the copolymerization of p-
phenylenediamine (PPDA) with aniline.
NH
*
NHNNH
NHN NH
N NHn
Copolymer
In the formation of copolymer , for 1 mole each of aniline and PPDA, 3 moles of peroxydisulphate
(PDS) are required [20] because when using 1 mole of PDS for 1 mole of aniline, the calculated yield for
aniline cannot be higher than 33%, while a yield of 62% to 75% was actually obtained [20]. It may be
concluded from these data that the reaction does not proceed according to Fig.4 given in the literature [20].
According to other literature data, in the case of a molar ratio of aniline/PPDA of 50:1, the presence of
PPDA greatly increases the rate of polymerization and does not affect the structure and crystallinity of PANI
[21].
These data strengthen our opinion that the reaction mechanism differs from that described in the
literature [20], and considering the scheme for the oxidative polymerization of PPDA [22], we have proposed
that it proceeds with a mechanism similar to that depicted in Scheme 1[23].
-NH2H2N- + 3?K2S2O82n
+ 2n NH3=N--N= -NH
-NH22n+
-NH
6nKHSO4 +
+
n
Page 3
3
Scheme 1
If the reaction occurs according to Scheme 1, the maximum yield calculated for aniline will be 67%, while
in the case of a ratio of PPDA-aniline in the copolymer of more than 1,the yield will be above 67%.
The purpose of the present work is to verify the possibility that the reaction proceeds according to
Scheme1.
2. Experimental
2.1 Measurements
The inherent viscosity of DMSO solution was determined at 25oC, using Ubbelohde viscometer.
The UV/vis spectra of the polymer samples were recorded in 1 cm quartz cuvettes with Specord 65
spectrometer. FT IR Nicolet Nexus spectrometer was served for obtaining FT-IR spectra in the range of
5000-600 cm-1 (KBr pellets). 1H- NMR spectra were obtained in deutеrateddimethylsulfoxide using
Mercury 300 Varian NMR spectrometer.
Electrical conductivity was measured on the preliminarily prepared pellets by two-probe method using
Teraohmmeter E6-137.
2.2 Materials
PPDA was purified by sublimation (mp 416-418 K) and PPDA sulfate was recrystallized from water.
Aniline was used after double-distillation. All other chemicals were of analytical grade and were used as
received without any further purification
2.3. Oxidative copolymerization of PPhDA with aniline by potassium peroxydisulphate
2.3.1. In the hydrochloric acid medium [20]
To 1.08g (10mmol) of PPhDA and 0.91ml(10mmol) of aniline in 100ml (0.1N) of hydrochloric acid,
solution of 2.7g (10mmol) potassium peroxydisulphate in 190ml (0.1N) of hydrochloric acid has been
added within 3 hours under continuous magnetic stirring at (273-275К). The solution was kept in refrigerator
(270 K) at night. Then, the solution was filtered and the precipitate was washed with distilled water until
neutral pH. 190 ml of 0.1 N solution of ammonium hydroxide was added on the precipitate and the mixture
was filtered after 13 hour stirring. The precipitate was washed with distilled water until neutral pH and
absence of SO4-2ions, dried in vacuo (323K /2 kPa) and stored in a dеsiccator over phosphorus pentoxide.
The yield is 1.02g (60%).After getting rid of water from the filtrate the ammonia was determined.
2.3.2 In the glacial acetic acid medium
Page 4
4
a. copolymer (serie C –I)
To a solution of 0.43 g (4.6mmol) aniline, 0.93g (4.3 mmol) PPDA sulfate in 8 ml acetic acid 1.44g
(6.45 mmol) potassium persulfate was added under continuous magnetic stirring at 27 K, the mixture was
stirred for 3.3 h.After that, the reaction mixture was kept in refrigerator at 270 K. Then the cooled water was
added into the mixture. Subsequent procedure was similar to the mentioned above.
The yield is 0,42g (51%).
b. copolymer (serie C-II)
The oxydative copolymerization was carried out by the above-mentioned procedure with the difference
in the duration of the reaction (See Table 1).
c. copolymer (serie C- III)
The oxydative copolymerization was carried out by the above-mentioned procedure using acetic acid (8
ml) -methanol (0.8 ml) medium(Table 1).
2.3.3. Semi-quantitative determination of ammonia
Ammonia was determined using distillation apparatus equipped with liquid trap, receiver filled with 120
ml 0.1N hydrochloric acid for ammonia absorption and Tishchenko bottle filled with water.
On a dry precipitate obtained after evaporation of the liquidfrom the filtrate, solution of 2.4 g of KOH in
6 ml of waterwas added through the dropping funnel. Heating was carried out so, that liquiddistillation didn't
proceed. The ammonia content was determined by titration of hydrochloric acid with alkali and was found to
be 8.96 mmol.
2.2.4. Oxidative polymerization of aniline
2.2.4.1. in acetic acid medium
4.01g (15mmol) of potassium peroxidisulfate was added to the mixture of 1.04g (11.16 mmol) of aniline,
0.483g (3.72 mmol) of aniline hydrochloride in 5 ml of acetic acid under contentious magnetic stirring 15
hour within 5 days, at 273-275K. Every time when stirring was interrupted , the reaction mixture was kept in
refrigerator at 270 K. Subsequent procedure was similar to the mentioned above.
Yield is 0.11g(8.6%)
2.2.4.2. in the mixture of acetic acid-methanol
3.64g (0.012 mol) of ammonium peroxidisulfate was added to a solution of 1.11g (0.012 mol) aniline,
0.523g (0.004 mol) of aniline hydrochloride in 17 ml of acetic acid and 1.7 ml of methanol under continuous
Page 5
5
magnetic stirring 36 hour within 8 days, at 273-275K. Every time when stirring was interrupted , the reaction
mixture was kept in freezer at 1-20C. Further procedure was carried out as described above.
Yield is 0.82g (57%).
2.2.5. Procedure for doping
2.2.5.1.with hydrochloric acid.
1.9 ml of 3N hydrochloric acid was added on the fine powder of polymer and left 7 days at room
temperature. Then the precipitate was filtered and washed twice with a small amount of ethanol. The
precipitate was dried until constant weight under vacoo in a dеsiccator over phosphorus pentoxide (0,2kPa).
2.2.5.2. with formic acid.
0.05g of fine powder of polymer was dissolved in 5 ml of formic acid at room temperature. The solvent
was removed at room temperature and the remained powder was dried until constant weight under vacoo in
a dеsiccator over phosphorus pentoxide (0,2 kPa).
3.Results and Discussion
During the course of the reaction according to Scheme , ammonia is formed as a result. For the purpose
of checkingthese data,we have repeated the experiment described in the literature [20]and we have
semiquantitatively determined the resulting ammonia content and found that 1.43 mmol of ammonia were
formed from 10 mmol of PPDA.
If the reaction proceeds according to Scheme 1, a polymer analogous to that of emeraldine would be
formed. However, the conductivity of the obtained chloride salt form of the polymer is equal to 2.719 × 10−5
S/cm [20], which is much lower than that of emeraldine. Because the mentioned value is related to the
conductivity of the as-synthesised salt form of the polymer, and consequently, there are no data about doping
levels, the as-synthesised polymer was converted to its base form and doped with 3 N hydrochloric acid to
reveala conductivity of 2.9 × 10-7 S/cm, which is, as mentioned above, far inferior to that of emeraldine.
Moreover, PPDA-aniline copolymer solutions in methanol and DMSO exhibit absorption bands at 308
and 549 nm [20], and 320 and 585 nm (Fig.1), respectively. The emeraldine base in N-methylpyrrolidinone
(NMP) is characterised by two absorption bands at 320 and 634 nm [24], and the film shows absorption
bands at 326 and 630 nm [25].
Page 6
6
It follows from the presented data that the polymer obtained by chemical oxidative copolymerization of
PPDA and aniline does not have a structure similar to that of emeraldine. These data could be explained by
the occurrence of side reactionsthat occur during the oxidative polymerization of PPDA [26].
To reduce the proportion of side reactions, we performedthe copolymerization reaction of PPDA and
aniline in glacial acetic acid and acetic acid-methanol media. The reaction in glacial acetic acid was
conducted in three variations designed to investigate the effect of reaction time on the yields and electrical
conductivities of the obtained copolymers (Table 1). An acetic acid-methanol medium was applied to
decrease the melting point of acetic acid.
The semiquantitative determination of ammonia content shows that 2.3 mmol of PPhDA and 0.19 mmol of
ammonia were formed.
Most likely, the reaction of PPDA with PDS takes place at first, and 1,4-benzoquinonediimine is formed,
which can participate in the subsequent reaction (Scheme 2). Finally, as a result of copolymerization,
poly(1,4-benzoquinonediimine-N,N'-diyl-1,4-phenyleneimino-1,4-phenyleneimino-1,4-phenylene), which
has a structure analogous to emeraldine PANI, is formed (Scheme 1). The copolymers are soluble in formic
acid, NMP and DMF, and partially soluble in DMSO.
NH2
NH2
NHNH
NH2
NH2
NNH NH2
NHNH
-
NH2
NNH-
NNH NH2
K2S2O8
NH3
NH3
K2S2O8
Scheme 2
The PMR, IR and UV spectra of the obtained copolymers are in close agreement with those published in
the literature for emeraldine.
Page 7
7
400 600 800 1000 1200
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
DX Axis Title
B
C
D
Fig.1. UV spectra (, nm) of (B) PPDA-aniline copolymer, obtained in a mixture of acetic acid-
methanol, in NMP, λmax=320,611; (C) PPDA-aniline copolymer, obtained in hydrochloric acid, in DMSO,
λmax=320,585; (D) Polyaniline, obtained in a mixture of acetic acid-methanol, in NMP, λmax=320,629.
The UV spectrum of the copolymer obtained in a medium of acetic acid-methanol shows absorption
bands at 320 and 611 nm in NMP (Fig.1). Accordingly, as cited above, a solution of emeraldine in NMP
exhibits absorption bands at 320 and 634 nm [23], while the film shows absorption bands at 326 and 630 nm
[24]. Polyaniline, obtained in a mixture of acetic acid-methanol, in NMP shows absorption bands at 320 and
629 nm.
The 1H NMR spectrum of the copolymer [Fig.2] is very similar to that reported in the literature for
emeraldine [27], with the difference being that there is an additional very weak chemical shift at 6.6 ppm,
which may most likely be assigned to the ortho protons of the terminal primary amino groups.
IR spectrum: 506,696,717,831,956, 1008, 1162; 1310; 1331; 1498; 1590; 3033; 3331 cm-1. These data
almost completely coincide with those reported in the literature for emeraldine [25].
Page 8
8
Fig.2 1H NMR spectrum (DMSO-d6,,ppm) of the PPDA-aniline copolymer.
To make a comparison with aniline-PPDA copolymerization, the polymerization of aniline in acetic acid
and in a mixture of acetic acid-methanol has been investigated. The oxidative polymerization reaction of
aniline proceeds at a much slower rate compared to copolymerization, and it depends on the medium in
which the reaction occurs. The specific electroconductivity of the copolymers doped with 3N hydrochloric
acid changed, depending on the copolymerization conditions, from 0.1 to 0.51 S/cm.The PANI obtained in
acetic acid (P-I) has an electrical conductivity of 3.4×10-4 S/cm, and that obtained in a mixture of acetic
acid-methanol was 0.06 S/cm. The latter value is comparable to that obtained for the 3N hydrochloric acid-
doped emeraldine PANI (0.09 S/cm) having been synthesised by the standard method (in a solution of
hydrochloric acid at 0o C) and to that according to the literature data (0.1 S/cm).[20].
The great difference in the conductivities of P-I and P-II could mainly be caused by the low molecular
mass of the former (see Table 1). It should be noted that the characteristic viscosities of the copolymer(C-III)
and the polymer (P-III) differ only slightly. The obtained data hereby indicate that PPDA-aniline copolymers
are, in fact, analogous to emeraldine PANI structures. The fact that the conductivity of the copolymer is
slightly higher than that of PANI can be caused by fewer defects in the former compound's structure.
According to the literature, the conductivity of PANI salts obtained in formic acid is higher than that
obtained in hydrochloric acid [28]. It should be noted that, during the oxidative polymerization of aniline,
ammonium or potassium bisulphate is formed from peroxydisulphate, and it also forms salts with the
polymer, along with hydrochloric acid and formic acid [29].
Page 9
9
The conductivities of both polymers and copolymers are two orders of magnitude lower in the case of
doping with pure formic acid than in a 3N solution of hydrochloric acid (Table1).
Acknowledgment: This material based upon work supported by State Committee Science MES RA, in
frame of the research project № SCS _13-1D298_.
Table 1
Data for yields, specific viscosities and electrical conductivities of aniline homopolymers (P) and copolymers
(C) with PPDA.
a, b-see experimental section
Homopolymer,
(P);
copolymer(C)
Reaction time
Yield
%
[]
dl/g
; S/cm
Hours Days Dopant
3 N hydrochloric
acid
Formic acid
C-Ia 3,3 1 51 0,1
C-Ib 3,3 1 51 0.15
P-I 15 4 14.3 0,074 3.4×10-4
C-IIa 2.3 7 61 0.13
C-IIb 2.3 7 61 0.17
C-IIIb 9 2 54 0,20 0,56; 0,46; 1×10-3
P-III 36 8 59 0,16 0.06;
0.052;0,0459
1.8×10-4
Page 10
10
References
1. Handbook of Conducting Polymers (Ed.T. A. Skorheim, R. L. Elsenbaumer, J. R. Reynolds), second
ed., (Marsel. Dekker. Inc, New York. Basel. Hong Kong, 1998).
2. Pron, A., Rannou, P., Processible conjugated polymers: from organic semiconductors to organic
metals and superconductors, Prog. Polym. Sci. 27, 135-190 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-
6700(01)00043-0
3. MacDiarmid, A.G. Short Course on Conductive polymers, (SUNY. New Paltz, NY, 1985).
4. Tallman, D.E., Spinks, G., Dominis, A., Wallace, G.G. Electroactive conducting polymers for
corrosion control. Part 1. General introduction and a review of non-ferrous metals
J. Solid State Electrochem. 6, 73-84 (2002). DOI 10.1007/s100080100212
5. MacDiarmid, A.G., Mu, S.L., Somasiri, M. L. D., Wu, W. Electrocհemical characteristics of
polyaniline cathodes and anodes in aqueous electrolytes. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 121, 187-190 (1985).
DOI:10.1080/00268948508074859.
6. Rahmanifar, M.S., Mousavi, M.F., Shamsipur, M., Heli H. A study on circuit voltage reduction as a
main drawback of Zn-polyaniline rechargeable battaries. Synth. Met. 155, 480-484 (2005).
doi:10.1016/j.synthmet.2005.06.009.
7. Abdolreza Mirmohseni, Reza Solhjo, Preparation and characterization of aqueous polyaniline battery
using a modified polyaniline electrode. Eur. Polym. J. 39, 219-223 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0014-
3057(02)00202-1
8. Kanatzidis, M.G. Conductive Polymers, Chem. Eng. News, 68, 36-50 (1990). DOI: 10.1021/cen-
v068n049.p036
9. Anderson, M.R., Mattes, B.R., Reiss, H., Kaner, R.B. Gas separation membranes: A novel
application for conducting polymers. Synth. Met. 41, 1151-1154 (1991).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0379-6779(91)91575-U.
10. Illing, G., Hellgardt, K., Schonert, M., Wakeman, R.J., Jungbauer, A. Towards ultrathin polyaniline
films for gas separation, J. Membr. Sci. 253, 199-208 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.12.03.
11. Gerard, M. Chaubey, A. Malhotra, B.D. Application of conducting polymers to biosensors. Biosens.
Bioelectron. 17, 345-359 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5663(01)00312-8.
12. Karyakin, A.A., Vuki, M., Lukachova, L.V., Karyakina, E.E., Orlov, A.V., Karpachova, G.P., Wang,
J. Processible polyaniline as an advanced potentiometric pH transducer. Application to
biosensors. Anal. Chem., 71, 2534-2540 (1999). DOI: 10.1021/ac981337a.
Page 11
11
13. Tzung-Hua Lin, Kuo-Chuan Ho. A complementary electrochromic device based on polyaniline and
poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 90, 506-520 (2006)
doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2005.02.017
14. Angelopoulos, M., Shaw, J.M., Kaplan, R.D., Perreault, S. Conducting polyanilines: Discharge layers
for electron‐beam lithography, JVST B7, 1519 (1989). http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.584524
15. Jyongsik Jang, Joonwon Bae, Moonjung Choi, Seong-ho Yoon, Fabrication and characterization of
polyaniline coated carbon nanofiber for supercapacitor. Carbon 43, 2730-2736 (2005)
doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2005.05.039
16. Arias-Pardilla, J., Salavagione, H.J., Barbero, C., Moralloґn, E., Vaґzquez, J.L., Study of the
chemical copolymerization of 2-aminoterephthalic acid and aniline. Synthesis and copolymer
properties, Eur. Polym. J. 42, 1521-1532 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj. 2006.02.003.
17. Ramanujam, P.S. , Hvilsted, S., Ujhelyi, F., Koppa, P., Lörincz, E., Erdei, G., Szarvas, G. Physics
and technology of opotical storage in polymer thin. Synth. Met. 124, 145-150 (2001).
doi:10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00454-4
18. Junqing, Zh., Shijie, X., Shenghao, H., Zhiwei, Y., Lina, Y., Tianlin Y. Organic light –emitting
diodes with AZO films as electrodes. Synth Met. 114,. 251 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0379-
6779(00)00237-X
19. Xin-Gui Li, Mei-Rong Huang, Yi-Min Hua, Facile Synthesis of Processible
Aminoquinoline/Phenetidine Copolymers and Their Pure Semiconducting. Macromolecules. 38,
4211-4219 (2005). DOI: 10.1021/ma047581n.
20. Rani, M., Ramachandran, R., Kabilan, S. A facile synthesis and characterization os semiconducting p-
phenylenediamine-aniline copolymer. Synth. Met. 160, 678–684 (2010).
doi:10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.01.001
21. Shenashen, M.A., Ayad, M.M., Salahuddin, N., Youssif, M.A. Usage of quartz crystal microbalance
technique to study the polyaniline filmsformation in the presence of p-phenylenediamine, React. &
Funct. Poly. 70, 843–848 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2010.07.005
22. Durgaryan, A.A., Arakelyan, R.H., Durgaryan, N.A., On the structure of poly(p-phenylenediamine) ,
2nd
International Caucasian Symposium on Polymers and Advanced Materials, Tbilisi, Georgia,
2010,p.31
23. Durgaryan, N.A., Arakelyan, R.H., Durgaryan, A.H.(A) Concerning the mechanism of oxidative
polymerization of p-phenylenediamine Prague, 2011, July 10-14 Czech Rebuplic, SL02,46.
24. Albuquerque, J.E., Matioso, L.H.C., Baloqh, D.T., Faria, R.M., Masters, J.G., MacDiarmid, A.G. A
simple method to estimate the oxidation state of polyanilines. Synth. Met, 113, 19-22 (2000).
doi:10.1016/S0379-6779(99)00299-4
Page 12
12
25. Gao, Y. Spectroscopic Studies of Acceptor and Donor Doping of Polyaniline in the Emeraldine base
and Pernigraniline Forms. Synth. Met. 35, 319-332 (1990). doi:10.1016/0379-6779(90)90216-8
26. Durgaryan, A.A. Arakelyan, R.A., Durgaryan, N.A. Oxidative Polymerization of p-
Phenylenediamine, Russ. J. Org. Chem. 84, 912-917 (2014). DOI: 10.1134/S1070363214060073
27. Focke, W.W., Wnek, G.E., J. Electroanal Chem. 256, 343-352 (1988).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(88)87008-6
28. Gomes, E.C., Oliveira, M.A.S. Chemical polymerization of aniline in hydrochloric acid (HCl) and
formic acid (HCOOH) media. Differences between the two synthesized polyanilines. Am. J. Polym.
Sci. 2 5-13 (2012). DOI: 10.5923/j.ajps.20120202.02
29. Durgaryan, A.H., Durgaryan, N.A., Arakelyan, R.H., Vanyan, S.G., Asaturian, R.A., Avetissyan,
A.A. Comparative investication of electric conductivity, spine properties and concentration
conjugated and nonconjugated polymers, Chem. J. Arm. 59, 84-90 (2006).(in russian)