5/7/2014 Controversies over Bonifacio’s death | Inquirer Opinion http://opinion.inquirer.net/74290/controversies-over-bonifacios-death 1/4 EDITORIAL COLUMNISTS TALK OF THE TOWN VIEWPOINTS Ads by Google Cebu Pacific is Hiring Check Their Latest Job Openings,Apply Here! jobstreet.com/CebuPacific Home > Opinion > Inquirer Opinion > Columns > Controversies over Bonifacio’s death Looking Back Controversies over Bonifacio’s death By Ambeth R. Ocampo Philippine Daily Inquirer 3:38 am | Wednesday, May 7th, 2014 0 406 Recommend Teresa De Jesus, saint and doctor of the Church, is quoted to have said that “more tears are shed over answered prayers than unanswered ones.” It is a warning about being careful what we ask for, or perhaps being open to the fact that God sometimes sees fit to give us what we need rather than what we want. Teresa de Jesus came to mind when I received an invitation to a memorial service for Andres Bonifacio at the church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Maragondon, Cavite. For many years now, some of Bonifacio’s descendants have been requesting the government to organize a state funeral for the Supremo of the Katipunan, he who began the Philippine Revolution against Spain in 1896. Now that they will get the recognition they asked for, on a smaller scale they will also reap a whirlwind because the memorial service is like opening Pandora’s Box. There is much in the life and tragic end of the Supremo that we as a people have to come to terms with. Jose Rizal was accorded an elaborate funeral in 1912 that included a solemn procession from the family home in Binondo to the Marble Hall in Intramuros where his mortal remains lay in state before these were deposited at the base of his monument along Roxas Boulevard. With the exception of a piece of Rizal’s backbone, chipped where the bullet struck and snuffed out his life, all of his bones now rest under the monument. On the other hand, we do not have Bonifacio’s bones. In my book “Bones of Contention” (2001), I argued that the so-called remains of the Supremo excavated in Maragondon in 1918 are fake. I believe that Bonifacio’s remains and those of his brother Procopio remain somewhere in the Maragondon range and have yet to be found and given a proper burial. During the discussion on the pomp that would accompany a state funeral for Bonifacio in the City of Manila, I suggested that in the absence of mortal remains a handful of earth from the execution site be placed in an urn to serve as the focus of a memorial service. How can we have a state funeral—or any funeral, for that matter—with an empty coffin? I was then trying to convince myself that a “symbolic” state funeral was possible. The Rizal monument has become the site of our Philippine Independence Day celebration. It is the monument where a succession of Philippine presidents, foreign dignitaries and heads of state have laid countless wreaths. The Rizal monument is actually a tomb; his remains are buried underneath it. In contrast, the Bonifacio monument in Caloocan is just a monument even if it has become a familiar landmark in a place now known as “Monumento.” This situation has led some people to ask: Who is greater then, Rizal or Bonifacio? It is an ideological rather than historical question that finds no resolution, which is why I have always maintained that we should stop comparing and measuring heroes against each other because it is not a boxing match where one emerges the victor, leaving a nation divided. Instead of choosing between Rizal or Bonifacio, we should embrace both as National Heroes for they both figured in the emergence of the nation. The memorial service this week in Maragondon makes us look into the way the two heroes lived and died: Rizal was executed by the enemy while Bonifacio was executed by fellow Filipinos. Bonifacio was killed by the very revolution he started. Andres and Procopio Bonifacio were tried for treason in an ancestral home now preserved by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines as the “Bonifacio Trial House.” The brothers were found guilty and sentenced to death; the sentence was later carried out, textbook history says, by a company of men under Lazaro Makapagal on May 10, 1897. I learned in school that the site of their execution was Mount Buntis, but when I did some field research in 1997 I was surprised to learn that the actual site is known as Nagpatong. It did not escape my green mind to see that some of the place names in the area could be arranged in order to suggest the sex act: Nagpatong, Pumutok, Buntis, and Hulog. To add to the many controversial issues surrounding Bonifacio’s death—the legality of the court martial and sentence, the role of Emilio 30 633 595 NEWS SPORTS LIFESTYLE ENTERTAINM ENT BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY OPINION GLOBAL NATION
Controversies Over Bonifacio’s Death - Inquirer Opinion
Nov 24, 2015
Controversies Over Bonifacio’s Death - Inquirer Opinion
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
-
5/7/2014 Controversies over Bonifacios death | Inquirer Opinion
http://opinion.inquirer.net/74290/controversies-over-bonifacios-death 1/4
EDITORIAL COLUMNISTS TALK OF THE TOWN VIEWPOINTS
Ads by Google
Cebu Pacific is HiringCheck Their Latest Job Openings,Apply Here!
jobstreet.com/CebuPacific
Home > Opinion > Inquirer Opinion > Columns > Controversies over Bonifacios death
Looking Back
Controversies over Bonifacios death
By Ambeth R. Ocampo
Philippine Daily Inquirer
3:38 am | Wednesday, May 7th, 2014
0 406Recommend
Teresa De Jesus, saint and doctor of the Church, is quoted to have said that more tears are shed over answered prayers than unanswered ones.
It is a warning about being careful what we ask for, or perhaps being open to the fact that God sometimes sees fit to give us what we need ratherthan what we want. Teresa de Jesus came to mind when I received an invitation to a memorial service for Andres Bonifacio at the church of Our
Lady of the Assumption in Maragondon, Cavite. For many years now, some of Bonifacios descendants have been requesting the government to
organize a state funeral for the Supremo of the Katipunan, he who began the Philippine Revolution against Spain in 1896. Now that they will getthe recognition they asked for, on a smaller scale they will also reap a whirlwind because the memorial service is like opening Pandoras Box.
There is much in the life and tragic end of the Supremo that we as a people have to come to terms with.
Jose Rizal was accorded an elaborate funeral in 1912 that included a solemn procession from the family home in Binondo to the Marble Hall inIntramuros where his mortal remains lay in state before these were deposited at the base of his monument along Roxas Boulevard. With the
exception of a piece of Rizals backbone, chipped where the bullet struck and snuffed out his life, all of his bones now rest under the monument.
On the other hand, we do not have Bonifacios bones. In my book Bones of Contention (2001), I argued that the so-called remains of theSupremo excavated in Maragondon in 1918 are fake. I believe that Bonifacios remains and those of his brother Procopio remain somewhere in
the Maragondon range and have yet to be found and given a proper burial. During the discussion on the pomp that would accompany a state
funeral for Bonifacio in the City of Manila, I suggested that in the absence of mortal remains a handful of earth from the execution site be placed inan urn to serve as the focus of a memorial service. How can we have a state funeralor any funeral, for that matterwith an empty coffin? I was
then trying to convince myself that a symbolic state funeral was possible.
The Rizal monument has become the site of our Philippine Independence Day celebration. It is the monument where a succession of Philippine
presidents, foreign dignitaries and heads of state have laid countless wreaths. The Rizal monument is actually a tomb; his remains are buried
underneath it. In contrast, the Bonifacio monument in Caloocan is just a monument even if it has become a familiar landmark in a place now
known as Monumento.
This situation has led some people to ask: Who is greater then, Rizal or Bonifacio? It is an ideological rather than historical question that finds no
resolution, which is why I have always maintained that we should stop comparing and measuring heroes against each other because it is not a
boxing match where one emerges the victor, leaving a nation divided. Instead of choosing between Rizal or Bonifacio, we should embrace both as
National Heroes for they both figured in the emergence of the nation.
The memorial service this week in Maragondon makes us look into the way the two heroes lived and died: Rizal was executed by the enemy
while Bonifacio was executed by fellow Filipinos. Bonifacio was killed by the very revolution he started. Andres and Procopio Bonifacio were
tried for treason in an ancestral home now preserved by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines as the Bonifacio Trial House.
The brothers were found guilty and sentenced to death; the sentence was later carried out, textbook history says, by a company of men under
Lazaro Makapagal on May 10, 1897. I learned in school that the site of their execution was Mount Buntis, but when I did some field research in
1997 I was surprised to learn that the actual site is known as Nagpatong. It did not escape my green mind to see that some of the place names inthe area could be arranged in order to suggest the sex act: Nagpatong, Pumutok, Buntis, and Hulog.
To add to the many controversial issues surrounding Bonifacios deaththe legality of the court martial and sentence, the role of Emilio
30 633 595
NEWS SPORTS LIFESTYLE ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY OPINION GLOBAL NATION
markHighlight
markHighlight
markHighlight
markHighlight
-
5/7/2014 Controversies over Bonifacios death | Inquirer Opinion
http://opinion.inquirer.net/74290/controversies-over-bonifacios-death 2/4
Ads by Google
CCTV starts @ P390Affordable CCTV Cameras and DVR,Made in KOREA, Dealers are welcome
www.opn.ph
More from this Column:
Controversies over Bonifacios deathSelfies with the dead?
US presidents and comfort food
Holy Week taboos
Toothpicks and toothpick holders
Other Stories:
Aguinaldo in the approval of the death sentence, whether Bonifacio ran or begged for his life, whether he was shot or hacked to death, etc.we
now have the suggestion that Bonifacio was not killed in Maragondon on May 10, 1897, but, rather, in his camp in Limbon on April 23, 1897!
When I first heard about this new controversy, I reviewed the transcript of the trial of Bonifacio now preserved in the National Library of the
Philippines, which has made it available online. On one page of the trial documents you can clearly see Bonifacios famous signature with aflourish, as well as his Katipunan name Maypagasa (There is hope). How can anyone even suggest that Bonifacio was killed during his capture
in Limbon in April when he signed one of the pages in the trial document in May?
Well, now it seems that the authenticity of the trial documents and all the other primary sources that have led all Filipino historians to accept May
10, 1897, as Bonifacios date of death is now in question. (Concluded on Friday)
Comments are welcome at [email protected]
Follow Us
406
Recommend
Doctors Rizal andMahathir
The first Filipino
Sponsored From Around the Web
How to Stop Snoring and ImproveYour Health
Everything You Thought You KnewAbout Golf Is Wrong
Heart Attack: How Your BodyWarns You Days Before
Bad News for TestosteroneBoosters
595
30
4
Google
633
markHighlight
-
5/7/2014 Controversies over Bonifacios death | Inquirer Opinion
http://opinion.inquirer.net/74290/controversies-over-bonifacios-death 3/4
Ads by Google
Recent Stories:
Dress rehearsal
Controversies over Bonifacios death
A most enjoyable vacation during the war (2)
Aquino rebuffs unions Labor Day wage demandsA war on girls
Breaking through the poverty ceiling
Visiting the sick
Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement compromises PH sovereignty
DAs Alcala, Calayag must answer for overpriced NFA rice imports in 2013
The true significance of Christian pilgrimages
Complete stories on our Digital Edition newsstand for tablets, netbooks and mobile phones; 14-issue free trial. About to step out? Get
breaking alerts on your mobile.phone. Text ON INQ BREAKING to 4467, for Globe, Smart and Sun subscribers in the Philippines.
Short URL: http://opinion.inquirer.net/?p=74290
Tags: andres bonifacio , Bonifacio , Cavite , Jose Rizal , Maragondon , National Historical Commission of the Philippines , National Library of the Philippines , OurLady of the Assumption , Philippine Revolution , Procopio Bonifacio , Rizal Monument , Supremo of the Katipunan , Teresa de Jesus , Bonifacio Trial House
Basketball Apparel & MoreBuy Sell Basketball Gear: AyosDito Fast, Free & No Required Sign Ups!
Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Orwrite The Readers' Advocate:
'Warren Buffett Indicator' SignalsCollapse in Stock Market
Weight Loss Pills What Worksand What Doesnt
?
You May Like by TaboolaSponsored Content
Is There an IT Talent Problem?
CFO Magazine
Rumor: Manny Pangilinan wants to
buy an NBA team
Coconuts Manila
What Kind of Customer Service
Increases Loyalty?
Ricoh
Running A Marathon In North Korea
Is Weird And Terrifying
VICE News
10 Signs That You Are Antisocial
Lifespan.com
Top 10 Great Vegetarian
Restaurants in the Philippines
Amerikanki
-
5/7/2014 Controversies over Bonifacios death | Inquirer Opinion
http://opinion.inquirer.net/74290/controversies-over-bonifacios-death 4/4
Copyright 1997-2014 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved
THE INQUIRER CHANNELS SERVICES THE INQUIRER COMPANYFOLLOW US
News
Sports
Entertainment
Lifestyle
Technology
Business
Opinion
Global Nation
Sitemap
Mobile
RSS
Wireless
Archive
Movies
Contact Us
Advertise
News Letter
About INQUIRER.net
About the INQUIRER
User Agreement
Link Policy
Privacy Policy
Article Index
PARTNERS
Related Documents
