Top Banner
Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology IAEA/NDS TAGS Meeting Vienna, Dec. 15-17, 2014
24

Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Kimberly Craze
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left

Tadashi YoshidaTokyo Institute of Technology

IAEA/NDS TAGS MeetingVienna, Dec. 15-17, 2014

Page 2: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

1)   Fission Yields:   JEFF-3.1 2) Decay Chains and Branchings: JEFF-3.13) Decay Energies : JEFF-3.1 being assumed to be approximately equivalent to ENSDF

Following calculations performed based on data files below along with the Jyväskylä & Idaho   TAGS Data  (Eb and Eg )

Aggregate FP Decay-Heat Calculations

Page 3: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 4: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 5: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 6: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 7: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 8: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 9: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 10: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 11: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 12: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Page 13: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Define Pandemonity Index

Note: Calculations hereafter were carried out based on JENDL FP Decay & Yield Data File 2011

Page 14: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Nuclide Z AQ-Value(MeV)

P- IndexBeta DH

(MeV/ Fiss.)Gamma DH(MeV/ Fiss.)

Total DH(MeV/ Fiss.)

CumulativeContributio

n

CumulativeFraction (%)

A-Y ListComment

Rb-90 37 90 6.58 1.34E-04 1.46E-04 2.80E-04 2.80E-04 9Kr-89 36 89 5.18 0.09 7.87E-05 1.09E-04 1.88E-04 4.68E-04 14Sr-93 38 93 4.14 4.74E-05 1.37E-04 1.85E-04 6.52E-04 20Xe-137 54 137 4.17 0.05 1.34E-04 1.51E-05 1.49E-04 8.02E-04 25Y-95 39 95 4.45 7.66E-05 5.90E-05 1.36E-04 9.37E-04 29

Cs-139 55 139 4.21 9.34E-05 1.99E-05 1.13E-04 1.05E-03 32Cs-140 55 140 6.22 4.93E-05 6.24E-05 1.12E-04 1.16E-03 36Sb-133 51 133 4.00 0.31 1.81E-05 7.52E-05 9.33E-05 1.26E-03 39 ○Sb-132 51 132 5.51 0.11 3.01E-05 6.27E-05 9.28E-05 1.35E-03 42Ce-145 58 145 2.54 2.96E-05 5.73E-05 8.69E-05 1.44E-03 44I-136 53 136 6.93 0.04 3.93E-05 4.64E-05 8.57E-05 1.52E-03 47

Tc-102 43 102 4.53 4.58E-05 3.85E-05 8.43E-05 1.61E-03 50Y-94 39 94 4.92 5.89E-05 2.51E-05 8.40E-05 1.69E-03 52Sr-94 38 94 3.51 2.58E-05 5.55E-05 8.13E-05 1.77E-03 55Rb-91 37 91 5.91 3.16E-05 4.93E-05 8.09E-05 1.85E-03 57

Rb-90m 37 90 6.69 2.35E-05 5.34E-05 7.69E-05 1.93E-03 60Pr-148 59 148 4.88 4.39E-05 3.22E-05 7.61E-05 2.00E-03 62Nb-99m 41 99 4.00 0.26 2.96E-05 4.30E-05 7.26E-05 2.08E-03 64 ○ b- 98%

Xe-138 54 138 2.77 0.09 2.62E-05 4.61E-05 7.23E-05 2.15E-03 66Rb-89 37 89 4.50 2.33E-05 4.54E-05 6.87E-05 2.22E-03 68Mo-101 42 101 2.81 tbc 1.66E-05 4.84E-05 6.51E-05 2.28E-03 70 Blachot '91

Ba-142 56 142 2.21 1.74E-05 4.73E-05 6.47E-05 2.35E-03 72Ba-141 56 141 3.21 2.91E-05 2.85E-05 5.75E-05 2.41E-03 74La-143 57 143 3.43 4.61E-05 1.01E-05 5.62E-05 2.46E-03 76Tc-103 43 103 2.66 0.60 2.70E-05 2.12E-05 4.82E-05 2.51E-03 77 ○

Sb-132m 51 132 5.70 0.42 1.45E-05 2.99E-05 4.44E-05 2.55E-03 79 b - 100%

Te-133 52 133 2.94 1.43E-05 2.43E-05 3.86E-05 2.59E-03 80Tc-104 43 104 5.58 1.37E-05 2.18E-05 3.55E-05 2.63E-03 81Br-86 35 86 7.63 tbc 1.31E-05 2.15E-05 3.46E-05 2.66E-03 82

Mo-103 42 103 3.75 0.68 1.59E-05 1.61E-05 3.20E-05 2.69E-03 83

Fig. The top 30 FPs Contributing to U235 Decay Heat at 5 min Cooling after a Fission

Green: Idaho TAGSBlue: Jyvaskyla TAGSBrown: On Request List in INDC(NDA)-0551

Page 15: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

From T.Arai, T.Yoshida, Proc. Nucl. Data Symp. 2010, JAEA-Conf 2011-002, pp.193 - 197

Page 16: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Nuclide Q-Value (MeV)

P-IndexFractional

Contribution (%)

Cooling Time

Half-Life Comment

Sb-133 4.00 0.31 3 5 min 2.34 min  

Nb-99m 4.00 0.26 2 5 min 2.6 min b- : 98%

Tc-103 2.66 0.60 1 5 min 54.2 s  

I-134 4.05 0.16 10 1 hour 52.5 min  

Sb-130 4.96 0.31 2 1 hour 39.5 min  

Y-93 2.89 0.15 10 1 day 10.2 hr  

Fig. Important FP Nuclides with Large P-Index Contributing at Long Cooling Time after a U-235 Burst Fission (Complemental to the Previous Slide)

Page 17: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

600 s

Page 18: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Nuclide Z AGamma

DH (Mev/Fiss.)

Fractional Contribution

(%)

Cumulative Fraction (%)

Half-LifeQ-Value (MeV)

P-Factor Etot/Eg Comment

Sr-93 38 93 9.19E-05 12 12       1.3  Rb-89 37 89 6.51E-05 8 20       1.5  Kr-89 36 89 4.24E-05 5 26 3.15 m 5.18 0.09 1.7  

Rb-90m 37 90 4.09E-05 5 31       1.4  Y-95 39 95 3.88E-05 5 36       2.3  

Rb-90 37 90 3.77E-05 5 41       1.9  Ba-142 56 142 3.62E-05 5 45       1.4  Xe-138 54 138 2.63E-05 3 49 14.1 m 2.77 0.09 1.6  Ba-141 56 141 2.58E-05 3 52       2.0  

Mo-101 42 101 2.43E-05 3 55 14.6 m 2.81 0.08 1.3 Blachot 1991

Y-94 39 94 2.36E-05 3 58       3.4  Cs-138 55 138 2.00E-05 3 61       1.5  Tc-102 43 102 1.63E-05 2 63       2.2  Ce-145 58 145 1.53E-05 2 65       1.5  Sb-131 51 131 1.48E-05 2 67 23.0 m 3.22 0.17 1.3  I-134 53 134 1.40E-05 2 68 52.5 m 4.18 0.16 1.2  

Te-133 52 133 1.32E-05 2 70 12.5 m 2.94 0.002 1.6  Cs-139 55 139 1.25E-05 2 72       5.7  

Sb-130m 51 130 1.15E-05 1 73 6.3 m 4.96 0.31 1.4 beta 100%Te-133m 52 133 1.06E-05 1 74 55.4 m 3.28 0.07 1.2  Tc-104 43 104 1.05E-05 1 76       1.6  La-142 57 142 9.89E-06 1 77       1.4  

Y-93m 39 93 9.67E-06 1 78 0.82 s 0.76 inapplicab

le1.1 I.T. 100%

Nb-99m 41 99 8.87E-06 1 79 2.6 m 4.00 0.26 1.7 beta 98%Sb-130 51 130 8.51E-06 1 80 39.5 m 4.96 0.10 1.2  

Sn-129m 50 129 8.41E-06 1 82 6.9 m 4.06 0.19 1.4 beta 100%Sb-132 51 132 8.13E-06 1 83       1.5  Br-84 35 84 8.05E-06 1 84 31.5 m 4.63 0.10 1.7  

La-143 57 143 7.77E-06 1 85       5.6  Sb-132m 51 132 7.52E-06 1 86 4.10 m 5.51 0.40 1.5 beta 100%

Fig. The top 30 FPs Contributing to U233 Gamma DH at 10 min after a Fission Burst

Green: Idaho TAGSBlue: Jyvaskyla TAGSBrown: On Request List in INDC(NDA)-0551

Page 19: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

600 s

Page 20: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Nuclide Z AGamma DH (Mev/Fiss.)

Fractional Contribution

(%)

Cumulative Fraction (%)

Half-LifeQ-Value (MeV)

P-Factor Etot/Eg Comment

Sr-93 38 93 8.60E-05 10 10       1.3  Rb-89 37 89 5.04E-05 6 17       1.5  Y-95 39 95 4.22E-05 5 22       2.3  

Rb-90 37 90 3.98E-05 5 27       1.9  Mo-101 42 101 3.82E-05 5 31 14.6 m 2.81 0.08 1.3  Kr-89 36 89 3.62E-05 4 36 3.15 m 5.18 0.09 1.7  

Xe-138 54 138 3.61E-05 4 40 14.1 m 2.77 0.09 1.6  Ba-142 56 142 3.41E-05 4 44       1.4  Tc-102 43 102 2.83E-05 3 48       2.2  Rb-90m 37 90 2.39E-05 3 51       1.4  Ba-141 56 141 2.35E-05 3 53       2.0  

Y-94 39 94 2.23E-05 3 56       3.4  Te-133 52 133 2.22E-05 3 59 12.5 m 2.94 0.002 1.6  Cs-138 55 138 1.99E-05 2 61       1.5  Sb-133 51 133 1.88E-05 2 64 2.34 m 4.00 0.31 1.2  Tc-104 43 104 1.87E-05 2 66       1.6  Sb-131 51 131 1.85E-05 2 68 23.0 m 3.22 0.17 1.3  Ce-145 58 145 1.82E-05 2 70       1.5  Sb-132 51 132 1.82E-05 2 73 2.79 m 5.51 0.35 1.5  Te-134 52 134 1.41E-05 2 74       1.3  Cs-139 55 139 1.38E-05 2 76       5.7  

Sb-130m 51 130 1.29E-05 2 78 6.3 m 4.96 0.31 1.4  Sb-132m 51 132 1.28E-05 2 79 4.10 m 5.51 0.40 1.5  Te-133m 52 133 1.14E-05 1 80 55.4 m 3.28 0.07 1.2  Nb-99m 41 99 1.13E-05 1 82 2.6 m 4.00 0.26 1.7  

I-134 53 134 9.59E-06 1 83 52.5 m 4.18 0.16 1.2  

Y-93m 39 93 9.04E-06 1 84 0.82 m 0.76 inapplicab

le1.1

IT, 95Sr:7.4m

Sb-130 51 130 8.75E-06 1 85 39.5 m 4.96 0.10 1.2  La-142 57 142 8.25E-06 1 86       1.4  La-143 57 143 7.90E-06 1 87       5.6  

Fig. The top 30 FPs Contributing to U235 Gamma DH at 10 min after a Fission Burst

Green: Idaho TAGSBlue: Jyvaskyla TAGSBrown: On Request List in INDC(NDA)-0551

Page 21: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

600 s

Page 22: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Nuclide Z AGamma

DH (Mev/Fiss.)

Fractional Contribution

(%)

Cumulative Fraction (%)

Half-LifeQ-Value (MeV)

P-Factor Etot/Eg Comment

Tc-104 43 104 6.02E-05 8 8       1.6  Sr-93 38 93 5.14E-05 7 15       1.3  

Mo-101 42 101 4.43E-05 6 21 14.3 m 2.81 0.08 1.3  Tc-102 43 102 3.97E-05 5 26       2.2  Y-95 39 95 3.12E-05 4 30       2.3  

Xe-138 54 138 2.87E-05 4 34 14.1 m 2.77 0.09 1.6  Ba-142 56 142 2.73E-05 4 38       1.4  Tc-105 43 105 2.73E-05 4 42       2.7  Ba-141 56 141 2.10E-05 3 45       2.0  Cs-138 55 138 1.95E-05 3 47       1.5  Sb-132 51 132 1.85E-05 2 50 2.79 m 5.51 0.35 1.5  Sb-131 51 131 1.77E-05 2 52 23.0 m 3.22 0.17 1.3  Rb-89 37 89 1.77E-05 2 54       1.5  I-134 53 134 1.67E-05 2 57 52.5 m 4.18 0.16 1.2  

Te-133 52 133 1.61E-05 2 59 12.5 m 2.94 0.002 1.6  

Rh-108 45 108 1.54E-05 2 61 16.8 s 4.51 0.66 2.1 108Ru:4.55

mY-94 39 94 1.53E-05 2 63       3.4  

Sb-132m 51 132 1.43E-05 2 65 4.10 m 5.51 0.40 1.5  Sb-130m 51 130 1.41E-05 2 67 6.3 m 4.96 0.31 1.4  Ce-145 58 145 1.36E-05 2 69       1.5  Rb-90m 37 90 1.28E-05 2 70       1.4  Rb-90 37 90 1.17E-05 2 72       1.9  Cs-139 55 139 1.15E-05 2 73 9.27 m 4.21 0.06 5.7  Kr-89 36 89 1.14E-05 2 75 3.15 m 5.18 0.09 1.7  

Te-133m 52 133 1.13E-05 2 76 55.4 m 3.28 0.07 1.2  Nb-99m 41 99 1.12E-05 1 78 2.6 m 4.00 0.26 1.7  Ru-107 44 107 1.05E-05 1 79 3.75 m 2.94 0.15 2.8  Sb-130 51 130 1.04E-05 1 81 39.5 m 4.96 0.10 1.2  Sb-133 51 133 9.85E-06 1 82 2.34 m 4.00 0.31 1.2  Te-134 52 134 9.33E-06 1 83 41.8 m 1.53 0.27 1.3  

Fig. The top 30 FPs Contributing to Pu-239 Gamma DH at 10 min after a Fission Burst

Green: Idaho TAGSBlue: Jyvaskyla TAGSBrown: On Request List in INDC(NDA)-0551

Page 23: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Recoverable Fission EnergyK.E. of Fission fragment : 168 MeVFission Neutron : 5 MeVPrompt Gamma : 7 MeVDelayed Gamma : 7 MeVBeta : 8 MeV Total 195 MeV

Fission Gamma-Ray Spectrum from Operating Reactors

Page 24: Contributions of Jyväskylä and Idaho TAGS to FP Decay-Heat Calculations: Their Complementarity and Problems Left Tadashi Yoshida Tokyo Institute of Technology.

Thank you for Your Attention