CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1.The University of St Andrews Museum Collections Unit 1 1.2. The Victorian Technology Project 2 2. Aims and Objectives 3 2.1. Deliverable Aims For the Museum Collections Unit 3 2.2. Timed Objectives 3 2.3. Learning Outcomes 3 3. Project Basics 4 3.1. Choosing a Project 4 3.2. Project Advisors 4 3.3. Project Timetable 4 3.4. Budget 5 4. Research 7 5. Instructions and Repair for the Handling Collection 8 5.1. Instructions 8 5.2. Repair 8 6. Storage and Documentation 9 6.1. Storage of the Collection 9 6.2. Documentation 9 7. Education Workshops 10 7.1. Planning the Workshops 11 7.2. Presenting the Workshops 12 7.3. Feedback 15 7.4. Analysis and Improvement 18 7.5. Producing Workshop Instructions 20 8. Future Plans 21 9. Evaluation of Aims and Objectives 22 9.1 Evaluation of Deliverable Aims for the Museum Collections 22 Unit 9.2. Evaluation of Timed Objectives 23 10. Project Summary 24
26
Embed
CONTENTS · PDF filewould refer to the contents of the collection as ‘Victorian technology’. ... was the main objective of the project. ... Curriculum is split into different age
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1.The University of St Andrews Museum Collections Unit 1 1.2. The Victorian Technology Project 2 2. Aims and Objectives 3 2.1. Deliverable Aims For the Museum Collections Unit 3 2.2. Timed Objectives 3 2.3. Learning Outcomes 3 3. Project Basics 4 3.1. Choosing a Project 4 3.2. Project Advisors 4 3.3. Project Timetable 4 3.4. Budget 5 4. Research 7 5. Instructions and Repair for the Handling Collection 8 5.1. Instructions 8 5.2. Repair 8 6. Storage and Documentation 9 6.1. Storage of the Collection 9 6.2. Documentation 9 7. Education Workshops 10 7.1. Planning the Workshops 11 7.2. Presenting the Workshops 12 7.3. Feedback 15 7.4. Analysis and Improvement 18 7.5. Producing Workshop Instructions 20 8. Future Plans 21 9. Evaluation of Aims and Objectives 22 9.1 Evaluation of Deliverable Aims for the Museum Collections 22 Unit 9.2. Evaluation of Timed Objectives 23 10. Project Summary 24
1
1. INTRODUCTION
As a student on the MLitt Museum and Gallery Studies course at the
University of St Andrews, I was required to plan, deliver and evaluate a
project within a museum or related institution. I chose to carry out a project at
the Museum and Collections Unit of the University of St Andrews, developing
a primary school workshop using a handling collection of Victorian technology.
This report will outline my experience with this project: what I did, what I
achieved and what I learned throughout.
1.1. The University of St Andrews Museum Collections Unit
The Museum Collections Unit of the University of St Andrews cares for and
displays a wide range of objects relating to the 600 year history of the
University of St Andrews, as well as running and managing all of the
University’s museums. The statement of purpose of the collections unit is as
follows:
‘The museum collections of the University of St Andrews are a central part of
the heritage of Scotland's oldest university. The Museum Collections Unit
exists to develop and care for these collections and to make them accessible
to all, through a variety of methods, including displays, publications, digital
technology and community engagement programmes. The Unit aims to
provide the highest quality facilities and services, matching the aspirations of
its parent University.’ (University of St Andrews Museum Collections Unit,
2013).
2
Within the Unit I would work with the Learning and Access team. This
team’s remit is to ‘fulfil the objective in the Museum Collections Unit’s
Statement of Purpose to make the collections accessible to all.’ (University of
St Andrews Museum Collections Unit, 2012).
1.2. The Victorian Technology Project
The purpose of the project was to develop an education programme for
Primary schools using a handling collection of Victorian technology objects, as
well as documenting and possibly developing the collection. The collection
consists of a phonograph, a magic lantern, and related materials, and was
donated to the museum by Dr Aileen Fyfe of the University of St Andrews
School of History.
3
2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
2.1. Deliverable Aims For the Museum Collections Unit
To research and appropriately document a handling collection of
Victorian scientific instruments, including instructions for the use of
these instruments.
To potentially develop the collection using the allocated budget.
To develop and pilot a programme of primary school workshops using
the collection.
2.2. Timed Objectives
Complete an outline of Primary workshop by end of November 2014.
Write instructions for using the Victorian Technology by end of
November 2014.
Carry out education workshop with at least two classes by end of
March 2015.
Create handling collection database by end of placement.
2.3. Learning Outcomes
To gain experience working with the Curriculum for Excellence.
To gain experience and confidence working with and engaging primary
school children.
To gain experience in creating and using Ad Lib databases.
To gain experience in planning and implementing a museum project.
To work with museum professionals and academics at a professional
standard.
4
To be able to evaluate the success and failures of the project.
3. PROJECT BASICS
3.1. Choosing a Project
In the first week of class, mid-September 2014, we were presented with a
variety of projects to choose between. The Victorian Technologies project was
my first choice of placement, as it combined my interest in museum education
with my scientific background.
3.2. Project Advisors
My main advisor for this project was Matthew (Matt) Sheard, a Learning
and Access Curator in the Museum Collections Unit. I also received advice
from Dr Aileen Fyfe from the University of St Andrews’ School of History.
Aileen had previously used the Victorian Technology handling collection to run
her own education and outreach events, and donated the collection to MUSA
when she found that her own schedule was curtailing the time she had
available for such events.
3.3. Project Timetable
From 20th of October 2014 I worked on the project in the Museum
Collections Unit office every Monday from 10am until around 4.30pm. I also
completed further work at home as required and held meetings on other days
when the schedule of my associates required.
Working in the Collections Unit Office meant that I could informally discuss
the project with Matt throughout the day rather than arranging formal
5
meetings. I was also able to speak to other members of Collection Unit staff
for advice, and enjoyed working in a professional museum environment.
3.4. Budget
The project had a budget of £1245. This funding was provided as a
Teaching and Development Grant from the University of St Andrews, awarded
prior to me starting work on the project.
6
4. RESEARCH
During the first few months of the project I conducted research on the
objects in the handling collection, using books and online sources as well as
Aileen’s knowledge. This allowed me to develop a familiarity with the
collection and heavily influenced the content of my education workshops. It
quickly became apparent that the project brief was somewhat inaccurate- the
collection is not composed of Victorian scientific instruments, but rather
instruments which would have been used mostly for entertainment and, in the
case of the magic lantern, educational lectures. Therefore from then on I
would refer to the contents of the collection as ‘Victorian technology’.
Phonograph from the Victorian technology handling collection.
7
5. INSTRUCTIONS AND REPAIR FOR THE HANDLING
COLLECTION
One objective for the project was to produce instructions to allow an
inexperienced operator to use the objects in the handling collection. As the
project proceeded a technical problem arose with the phonograph, so I was
also required to take action to have this object repaired.
5.1. Instructions
During our first meeting Aileen taught me how to use the phonograph and
magic lantern. I was tasked with using this information to produce written
instructions on using the objects. These documents will be required if my
workshop plans are to be used by another museum employee or volunteer.
I have now written instructions for the using magic lantern. These have
already been put to use when staff in the University of St Andrews Film
Studies Department borrowed the lantern for teaching. I also produced a first
draft of instructions for using the phonograph in November, but this has not
yet been completed due to the technical difficulties with the phonograph
detailed in section 5.2.
5.2. Repair
While photographing the collection in November 2014 I was unable to start
the phonograph. After I verified that there was no simple solution to the
problem with Aileen I began to look for someone who could repair it.
Aleksander Kolkowski, who Aileen had purchased the phonograph from,
recommended two engineers who may be able to help. As phonograph repair
8
is a specialised skill it took me some time to get hold of a suitable engineer,
but in February I spoke to Mike Child who asked me to take the base off the
phonograph and send him some photographs of the mechanism. This was to
determine if there was a simple solution to the problem before we paid to
send the phonograph to his workshop in the South of England.
When Matt and I took the base off the phonograph we quickly noticed that
the belt had slipped out of place. Putting the belt back into position appeared
to fix the problem.
In March, while preparing for my workshop, I discovered that phonograph
would stop playing again after a short time. This was again due to the belt
slipping out of place, and could be temporarily repaired by moving the belt into
position. It is therefore now clear that Matt and I have not succeeded in
repairing the phonograph, and that some of the remaining project budget will
need to be used to send the phonograph to an engineer for repair.
9
6. STORAGE AND DOCUMENTATION
6.1. Storage of the Collection
The need to improve the storage of the Victorian Technology collection was
readily apparent, as at the start of the project the collection was stored in a
number of un-lidded cardboard boxes. In December 2014 I measured all
objects in the collection. Separating the collection into the magic lantern and
accessories and the phonograph and accessories, I calculated what size of
plastic box (Really Useful Box brand) would be required to hold each part of
the collection and produced diagrams showing how these boxes could be
compartmentalised using plastizote.
At present the boxes have been purchased and the collection is stored in
them, but the plastizote compartments have not yet been created.
6.2. Documentation
In December 2014 I received training on the use of Ad Lib in the Museum
Collections Unit from curator Jessica Burdge, created an ‘external collection’
database for handling collections and began to document the collection. Later
in the month Matt and I agreed that I would take responsibility for
documenting the phonograph and related objects, while Mathilde (another
student working on the project) would take on the magic lantern. By April 2015
I had completed a basic entry for the magic lantern, the phonograph, and the
6 phonograph cylinders.
10
7. EDUCATION WORKSHOPS
The production of a primary school education workshop using the collection
was the main objective of the project.
7.1. Planning the Workshops
For a workshop to be useful to school teachers it must cover ‘learning
outcomes’ set out by the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence. I therefore used
the Curriculum for Excellence as a starting point for my workshop planning,
listing all of the learning outcomes that could potentially be incorporated. The
Curriculum is split into different age groups, or levels. I selected level 2
(Primary 4-7) as the target for my workshops, as working with the upper levels
of primary school for allow me to use more complex information in my
workshop.
After listing Curriculum outcomes that a Victorian technology workshop
could cover I began to develop activities and structure the workshop, with
input from Matt and Aileen. I chose to split my project into two separate
workshops, one based on the magic lantern and the other on the phonograph.
Each would last around an hour and a half, and these workshops could be
presented a school individually or together. By mid-November I had
completed a plan for each workshop, with details of every activity that would
be included. I discussed this plan with Matt, Aileen and Sara Russell, a
teacher at Cannongate Primary School, and by February 2015 I had finalised
this plan. An outline of each workshop is as follows:
11
Magic Lantern Workshop Phonograph Workshop
Introduce the lantern by telling the
story of Little Red Hood.
Introduce the phonograph and
explain how it works.
Explain how the lantern works and
discuss its history.
Compare the recording length of the
phonograph to modern music and
mp3 players.
Show how layers are used in moving
slides and cartoons.
Compare the phonograph cylinder to
vinyl records and CDs.
Pupils make and show their own
moving slides.
Technology card matching game.
Show a film of St Andrews in the
1920s.
Compare the sound quality of the
phonograph to an MP3 (Spot the
Instrument activity).
Discuss what else recordings can be
used for apart from music.
Pupils make their own record player
from household materials
In both workshops I included a mix of listening and active activities to
prevent pupils from getting bored. I also tried to get pupils to work out or
guess answers, rather than simply telling them.
As well as purchasing a new set of story slides, I prepared various
resources for the workshops: PowerPoint presentations, a script to
accompany the story slides, slides to assist children in creating a story with
moving slides, and cards for the technology matching game.
12
7.2. Presenting the Workshops
The part of the project that I was most worried about was presenting the
workshops to a class. To gain experience and confidence with this I
shadowed Sara’s teaching on two afternoons, and also assisted with a MUSA
Young Artists workshop. Shadowing Sara was particularly helpful, as it
allowed me to get to know the class, and the class me. Being able to meet a
class prior to a workshop would not happen in professional museum
education, but it was very useful for alleviating my worries and improving my
confidence for this first session.
On the 18th of March I presented the workshops to Sara’s class in the
morning, with morning break acting as an interval. Sara’s class was small (18
pupils, 15 of whom were present for the workshop) and consisted of Primary 6
and 7 pupils. I was lucky in that Sara was very flexible about the length of the
workshop. I would start at 9.20am, and could work with the class until
lunchtime at 12.25pm, but if the session finished before then Sara was happy
to take over and teach the class until lunch.
Overall I believe the workshop went very well. The pupils seemed engaged
and to enjoy most activities. The standard of behaviour was generally high,
and when problems arose Sara dealt with them, leaving me to carry on with
the workshop.
When I first played the phonograph to the class the machine stopped
working due to the belt problems detailed in section 5.2., requiring me to
repair the phonograph in front of the class. Fortunately the class were very
well behaved during this time, and Sara used it as an opportunity to discuss
problems of technology. However, in a less calm classroom this could have
13
been a big problem and the occurrence highlighted the need for the
phonograph to be repaired.
My key observations from the workshops are as follows:
Little Red Hood story: I had worried that older children would find the
story telling introduction boring, but seeing the slides on the magic
lantern was enough to keep them interested.
Slide Making: Pupils took a while to understand the activity, but once
they did most seemed to enjoy it. I should have emphasised the need
to leave a border around slides, and a ‘tab’ on moving parts to hold on
to. Making slides took longer than expected.
Card matching game: This section was the most problematic. Pupils
found the game quite difficult and were confused by my inclusion of
categories as normal cards alongside answers.
Spot the Instrument activity: The pupils found it very difficult to
recognise instruments on the phonograph version of Hungarian
Rhapsody No 2, and when they suggested instruments which weren’t
on the recording I wasn’t sure whether to write them down or not. I
Pupils working on their moving slides
Pupils' slides being shown on the magic lantern.
14
chose to write incorrect guesses down to keep the activity flowing, but
in retrospect that was the wrong choice. The activity clearly required
some further development.
Making a record player: Due to time limitations Sara and I carried out
this activity in the front of the class rather than having the pupils try it
themselves. Having this homemade record player create a
recognisable sound was far more difficult than I had thought, but the
pupils seemed to get the point and found the demonstration amusing.
Film of 1920s St Andrews: I forgot to play this video after the magic
lantern workshop, so played it after the phonograph session. I felt it
was a nice way to round off the morning, and the pupils enjoyed
working out which streets were in the video.
I very much enjoyed carrying out the workshop. It was my first experience
of leading an education event rather than following other people’s instructions,
so provided a great opportunity to develop my presentation skills as well as
improving my confidence working with children. I was able to think on my feet
and alter activities in response to pupils’ needs and time constraints. Such
flexibility is important when running an education event.
A magic lantern slide from the Little Red Riding Hood set.
15
7.3. Feedback
7.3.1. Pupil Feedback
Following advice from Sara, I collected feedback from the pupils via a
‘plenary’ activity. At the end of the morning, the pupils drew around their
hands and wrote one thing that they had learnt on each finger. On the top of
their palm they wrote the part of the workshops that they had enjoyed the
most, and on the bottom they wrote what they found the most difficult.
I feel that this was a suitable method of collecting feedback, as it provided
information for me while also asking the pupils to reflect on what they had
learnt. However, one downside is that I had to dismiss some data due to
problems reading handwriting.
The table below summarises what feedback indicates that pupil learnt
during the session. I was pleased to see that there are entries from both
workshops, suggesting pupils learnt from both the phonograph and magic
lantern sessions.
16
‘What I learnt’ Number of pupils
Differences between different types of music
technologies.
12
What a magic lantern was, how it works and what it was
used for.
10
What a phonograph was, and what it was used for 9
About the Edison talking doll, and its failure. 6
The use of layers in cartoons. 5
How to make moving slides and use them to tell a story. 4
How to make a record player. 3
Museums have old technology. 1
Old technology can still work if cared for. 1
The use of bumps in sound recording. 1
On the next page are pie charts representing the pupils’ favourite aspects
of the workshops (Figure 1), and those they found most difficult (Figure 2).
This feedback confirms my observations that pupils enjoyed making slides
and found the card matching game challenging. However, it also shows that
pupils enjoyed a wide range of activities including making a record player and
learning about how layers are used in animation. The card matching game
was the most common choice for a difficult task, but second was the Spot the
Instrument activity, confirming that this also needed some work.
17
.
Technology Card game,
6
Making moving slides, 1 The magic
lantern, 1 Show slides using the
magic lantern, 1
Music comparison,
2
No response, 4
Figure 2: Pie chart representing pupils' most challenging aspect of the Victorian Technology workshops. n=15.
Technology Card game, 1
Making moving slides, 4
The magic lantern, 2 Learning
about animation, 2
Making a record
player, 2
'Learning', 1
No response, 3
Figure 1: Pie chart representing pupils' favourite aspect of the Victorian Technology workshops. n=15.
18
7.3.2. Teacher Feedback
I discussed the workshop with Sara straight after the session, and also emailed
her the same day to receive some written feedback. Overall, Sara felt that the
workshop had went well. She reported that the children had most enjoyed the slide
making activity and confirmed that they had found the card matching game
confusing. She also suggested that it might be beneficial to include more information
about how the objects worked in future workshops
7.4. Analysis and Improvement
The week after carrying out the workshops I had a meeting with Matt to discuss
and analyse them. Due to my own reservations and the feedback about the card
matching game and the Spot the Instrument activity, we discussed ways that these
sections could be improved. We came up with the following plans:
Card Matching Game: Split pupils into groups and give them large (A5) cards with
the answer cards, colour coded by category. Workshop leader writes the four music
technologies and the categories on the board, and ask groups to hold up a card with
their answer for each answer in turn. Keep a point tally and announce a winner at the
end.
This alteration will prevent pupils from getting confused about categories, and will
allow them to consider each question separately rather than having to think about all
cards at once. It will also allow the workshop leader to give clues about any
questions the class gets stuck on. The activity will be quick and interactive, and
adding a competitive aspect will improve engagement.
19
Spot the Instrument: List every instrument that can be heard in the recordings on
the board. Don’t tell pupils whether the instruments are in the recordings or not, but
present them as a range of options. Pupils tell the workshop leader when they can
hear one of the instrument options.
This alteration solves the problem of whether to write down incorrect guesses. It
also helps pupils who might recognise the sound of an instrument but not know its
name.
Overall, Matt was very pleased with my account of the workshop. He confirmed
my suspicion that having to repair the phonograph during the workshop would have
been a problem in a less well-behaved class. He also thought that my decision to
make a record player as a demonstration rather than an activity would have been
problematic in a less engaged class, so recommended that I keep it as an activity in
my workshop instructions. He stressed that I would need to outline the times
required for the workshops in my instructions, as teachers are not generally as
flexible about workshop length as Sara was.
One problem with the workshop plan came up in this meeting that I have not yet
been able to solve. The magic lantern workshop requires the playing of a short
cartoon clip via www.bobnational.net, a website which allows universities to access
television footage for education use. I was able to access this at Cannongate
Primary School, but other schools may block such sites on their network. I have not
yet found an alternative to this online video, but possible solutions are to buy a DVD
with a suitable cartoon, or look into whether there are any suitable downloadable
videos available for education use.
20
7.5. Production of Workshop Instructions
The purpose of the project was to produce resources that a member of MUSA
staff or a volunteer could use to carry out the workshops in the future. To assist with
this I produced an instructional report that would allow someone else to perform the
workshops. This included the alterations made to activities following my discussion
with Matt and the time needed for each workshop and activity. It also included
information about resources and preparation required for the workshops and some
background information on the objects.
21
8. FUTURE PLANS
I hope to continue my involvement with the Victorian Technology project over the
summer. The key objectives for this will be to have the phonograph repaired, to
produce instructions for using the phonograph, and to continue to improve storage of
the collection. As stated in the brief the Museum Collections Unit hoped that through
this placement I would develop a workshop which could be carried out by other
members of staff or volunteers. I hope that I have created resources that will allow
this to happen.
22
9. EVALUATION OF AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
At the start of the project I received a list of deliverable objectives for the Museum
Collections Unit, and set myself a set of timed project objectives. In this section I will
evaluate my success in meeting these aims and objectives.
9.1. Evaluation of Deliverable Aims For the Museum Collections Unit
To research and appropriately document a handling collection of Victorian
scientific instruments, including instructions for the use of these instruments.
PARTIALLY ACHEIVED. I produced an account of the history of the handling
objects (as provided in my workshop instruction report) and documented my
allocated section of the collection. I have produced instructions for using the
magic lantern, but not the phonograph.
To potentially develop the collection using the allocated budget.
PARTIALLY ACHIEVED. I made one addition to the collection in the form of
the Little Red Riding Hood story slides, and partially implemented plans to
improve collection storage. If I had focussed more on the development of the
collection rather than its use in workshops I could have done more to achieve
this aim.
To develop and pilot a programme of primary school workshops using the
collection.
ACHIEVED. I was successful in developing and piloting workshops using the
collection, and in using this pilot session to improve the workshop programme.
23
9.2. Evaluation of Timed Objectives
Complete an outline of primary workshop by end of November 2014.
ACHIEVED: I submitted my initial workshop outline in November. I was able
to improve this plan through advice from Matt, Aileen and Sara prior to the
workshops, and using teacher and pupil feedback after the workshop.
Write instructions for using the Victorian Technology by end of November
2014.
PARTIALLY ACHIEVED: I completed first drafts of these instructions in
November. However, only the magic lantern instructions have been proof read
and tested by an untrained user.
Carry out education workshop with at least two classes by end of March 2015.
NOT ACHIEVED: I only had time to carry out the workshops with one class.
Create handling collection database by end of placement.
ACHIEVED: I created a database for documenting the Museum Collections
Unit’s handling collections, and created entries for the phonograph and its
associated objects, as well as the magic lantern.
24
10. PROJECT SUMMARY
The one project objective that I did not meet was to pilot the programme with two
classes- I only had time to carry it out with one. Looking back over the project I feel
that this objective was rather ambitious. It would have been useful to receive
feedback from two classes, but considering the project timetable I think planning for
one from the start would have been more realistic.
Another objective that was only partially achieved was the production of
instructions for using the instruments. The phonograph instructions were side lined
while the phonograph was out of use, and by the time it was repaired I was too busy
preparing the workshop to complete these instructions. With retrospect, I could have
written the instructions from memory while the phonograph wasn’t working, but I can
complete these instructions as I continue to work on the project over the summer. I
am satisfied with my decision to focus on workshop preparation rather than collection
development during the project, as this was the aspect I was most passionate about.
At times in the project I faced difficulties with confidence in my ability to engage
pupils and maintain behaviour during the workshop, but I took steps to alleviate
these worries such as shadowing Sara teaching. The final workshop was a very
positive experience, which has hugely increased my confidence leading education
events..
Overall, I feel that the Victorian Technology project was very successful. I gained
a lot of new skills by seeing an education programme from conception to
implementation, including working with the Curriculum for Excellence, planning
engaging activities for children, working with advice from a variety of advisors,
working with children in a school setting, and responding to feedback. I also gained
practical experience in documentation and producing instructional reports for use
25
with museum objects. I feel that I succeeded in creating a strong school workshop,
and hope that I have created a programme which my host organisation will be able