Top Banner
Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas
35

Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Jan 04, 2016

Download

Documents

Janis Alexander
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation

OLA SuperConference31 January 2014

Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas

Page 2: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Agenda• Introduction - Charlotte• Definitions - Matt• Constructivism - Matt• Deconstruction - Charlotte• Complementary – Matt & Charlotte• Conclusion – Matt & Charlotte

Page 3: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Introduction

"Moreover as purveyors of culture, libraries are instrumental in forming the ideology of the community. The community's ideology, in part formed by the library, is the source from which the alleged values are drawn." (p299)

Page 4: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Definitions

Page 5: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Evaluation

Page 6: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Evaluation“Determination of Value”

Page 7: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Value

Page 8: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Value“Quantity or measurement”

Page 9: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Value“Principle or standard of

behaviour”

Page 10: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Value“Desirable property”

Page 11: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Others?

Page 12: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Constructivism

Page 13: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Epistemological or Educational

Constructivism

Page 14: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Cognitive ConstructivismSocial Constructivism

Constructionism (or Linguistic Constructivism)

Page 15: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

“Learning is an active process of constructing rather than acquiring knowledge.”

Page 16: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

“Evaluation is an active process of constructing rather than

acquiring (or simply measuring) value.”

Page 17: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Epistemological Foundationalism

“theories of justification which require a distinction, among justified beliefs, between those which are basic

and those which are derived, and a conception of justification as one-directional, i.e., as requiring basic to

support derived beliefs, never vice versa.”

From Susan Haack’s 1993 book “Evidence and inquiry : towards reconstruction in epistemology”.

Page 18: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Evaluative Constructivism

“Evaluation is an active process of constructing value rather than

‘acquiring’ it, resulting in hierarchy of values, some being derived from

others.”

Page 19: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Deconstruction

“The object of deconstruction is to highlight the unacknowledged assumptions that govern descriptions of reality and denaturalize them.” (p86)

Page 20: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Other

"She argued that the "universal" is taken to be the "white, ethnically European, bourgeois, Christian, heterosexual, able-bodied male (WEBCHAM) presence" from which all else is deviation (Olson 2001a 4)." (p83)

Page 21: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Purveyors of Culture

"Moreover as purveyors of culture, libraries are instrumental in forming the ideology of the community. The community's ideology, in part formed by the library, is the source from which the alleged values are drawn." (p299)

Page 22: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Constructivism and Deconstruction are

complementary.

Page 23: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Cyclically&

Simultaneously.

Page 24: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Cycles ofConstruction

&Deconstruction

Page 25: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

From “Subway Construction Company Ltd. (via subwaycon.com)

Page 26: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

i. Constructivist building of your value system and individual evaluations.

ii. Deconstructing, to identify flaws, assumptions, problems, etc.

iii. Go to (i) and REPEAT FOREVER.

Page 27: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Complementary - Charlotte

Page 28: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Conclusions…

Page 29: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

“Value is constructed.”

Page 30: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

“A construction needs maintenance.”

Page 31: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

“Normalization is the goal.”

Page 32: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

“Normalization is the goal.”

Objectivity

Page 33: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Conclusion - Charlotte“Derrida's lesson for libraries is not necessarily that they can overcome this condition but rather to show how ostensibly neutral or objective practices of organizing information implicate these practices in the perpetuation of dominant discourses and to highlight the ethical responsibilities libraries have as arbiters of knowledge and meaning.” (p 86)

Page 35: Constructivism & Deconstruction in Electronic Resource Evaluation OLA SuperConference 31 January 2014 Charlotte Innerd & Matt Thomas.

Selected BibliographyBohannon, J. (2013). Who's Afraid of Peer Review? Science 342: 6154, 60-65. doi:10.1126/science.342.6154.60Callison D. (2001). Constructivism. School Library Monthly, 18(4):35-51.Deodato, J. (2010). Deconstructing the Library with Jacques Derrida. In G. J. Leckie, L.M. Given & J.E. Buschman (eds) Critical

theory for library and information science (75-88). Oxford: Libraries Unlimited.Haack S. (1993). Evidence and inquiry : towards reconstruction in epistemology. Oxford : Blackwell. Lee, D.N. (2013, October 11). Responding to No name Life Science Blog Editor who called me out of my name. Retrieved from

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/urban-scientist/2013/10/11/give-trouble-to-others-but-not-me/ Meinershagen K (Allen Press). (2012). Is that 90,000 Articles in Your Pocket? Evaluating the BioOne Mobile Site. BioOne

Publishers and Partners Meeting, Friday, April 19, 2013, in Washington, DC.Millard WB. (2013). Some research wants to be free, some follows the money. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 62(2):A14-A20.Miller, R. (2008). Twelve Point Plan For Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Databases. Computers In Libraries, 28(7), S2-S3.Nature’s sexism (2012). Nature 491:495. doi:10.1038/491495aOlson, H.A. (1997). The Feminist and the Emperor’s New Clothes: Feminist Deconstruction as a Critical Methodology for Library

and Information Studies. Library & Information Science Research 19:2, 181-198.Olsen, H.A. & Fox, M.J. (2010). Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: Deconstructionst, Marxist, Feminist, Postcolonialist. In G. J. Leckie, L.M.

Given & J.E. Buschman (eds) Critical theory for library and information science (295-309). Oxford: Libraries Unlimited.Stvillia B, Gasser L, Twidale MB, Smith LC. (2007). A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of the American

Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12):1720-1733.Talja, S., Tuominen, K. & Savolainen, R. (2005) “Isms” in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism.

Journal of Documentation 61:1, 79-101.