Document No 18027-PL-HSE-0002 Rev Date Status Originated/ Custodian Checked Approved 1 15/06/2020 Issued for Use Kim Stewart L & A Lead Matt Baker Project Manager Phillip McCutcheon Manager Access and Approvals – South East 0 28/04/2020 Issued for Review Kim Stewart L & A Lead Matt Baker Project Manager Phillip McCutcheon Manager Access and Approvals – South East Construction Environment Management Plan Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project Day 4 Version - clean
187
Embed
Construction Environment Management Plan · 2020. 12. 16. · APA HSE EP 13.01.03 Management Plan Process and Design (Environmental Procedure) ... Western Port, Victoria and a connection
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Document No 18027-PL-HSE-0002
Rev Date Status Originated/
Custodian Checked Approved
1 15/06/2020 Issued for Use
Kim Stewart
L & A Lead
Matt Baker
Project
Manager
Phillip McCutcheon
Manager Access and
Approvals – South East
0 28/04/2020 Issued for Review Kim Stewart
L & A Lead
Matt Baker
Project
Manager
Phillip McCutcheon
Manager Access and
Approvals – South East
Construction Environment
Management Plan
Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline
Project
Day 4 Version - clean
i
Construction Environment Management Plan
Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project
Contents
1 Introduction 2
1.1 Purpose and scope 2
1.2 Document references 4
2 Project overview 5
2.1 Location 5
2.2 Timeframe 7
2.3 Consultation 8
2.4 Pipeline specifications 8
2.5 Pipeline construction 8
2.5.1 Pipeline Construction Sequence and Activities 9
2.5.2 Crossings 11
2.5.3 Other pipeline facilities 15
2.5.4 Pipeline testing and commissioning 16
2.6 Pipeline Rehabilitation 16
2.7 Pipeline Start-Up Operations 17
3 Environmental setting 18
4 Regulatory setting 19
5 Environmental framework 24
5.1 Overview 24
5.2 Environmental Risk Management 25
5.3 Organisational structure and responsibility 25
6 Performance objectives and standards 30
6.1 Contingency plans 30
7 Assurance 31
7.1 Training 31
7.2 Audit Program 31
7.3 Performance Monitoring 32
7.4 Regulatory Reporting 34
ii
Construction Environment Management Plan
Crib Point Pakenham Pipeline Project
7.5 Incident Reporting Notification 35
7.6 Complaints procedure 37
7.7 Corrective actions 37
7.8 Emergency response procedure 38
7.9 Records 39
8 References 40
9 Attachments 41
A Pipelines Regulations Part 7 Requirements 42
B APA HSE Policy 47
C Reportable incident notification template 48
D Complaint management process 49
E Unexpected discoveries of historical
archaeological sites 51
F Contingency Plan – Chemical /Fuel Spill Response 54
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
77 1 9.5204489 9.5624624 X native
vegetation
Damp Sands
Herb-rich
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
78 0 9.6 x Watercourse Olivers Creek - WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
79 0 10 10.05 x PMP Existing
vegetation
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to existing planted mature trees.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
80 0 10.5 10.55 x PMP Existing
vegetation
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to existing planted mature trees.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
81 0 10.67 10.7 Infrastructure Power
infrastructure
ROW
width
reduced
to 15m
- Avoid tower for HV overhead power line
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
82 0 10.99 11.05 x Historic
heritage
Denham Road
farmhouse VHI
listed site H7921-
0119
Bore and
ROW
reduced
to 9m
HH2
B3
Subject to further detailed geotechnical investigations confirming suitability, trenchless
construction techniques will be used to minimise direct impacts on historic heritage values at
the Denham Road farmhouse (VHI site H7921-0119)
The width of the right of way will be reduced
EMF
83 0 11.3 11.34 x PMP Existing
vegetation
ROW
width
reduced
to 15m
A1 Avoid disturbance to existing planted mature trees.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
6
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
84 1 11.8131009 11.852816 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
85 1 11.9584045 11.986686 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
86 1 11.9925435 12.002511 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
87 0 12 12 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential Swamp
Skink habitat
B10 Apply protocol for clearing Swamp Skink habitat
EMF
88 0 12.14 12.2 x Infrastructure Existing dwelling Bore and
access
track
A1 Avoid disturbance to an existing dwelling and driveway
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
89 0 12.95 13 x PMP Existing
vegetation
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to existing planted mature trees.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
90 0 13.3 14.4 x PFAS east of the
former Tyabb
landfill
T12 Contaminated groundwater/trench water
a. Contaminated groundwater/trench water will be managed in accordance with:
– SEPP (Waters)
– PFAS National Environmental Management Plan.
b. All Project personnel will be made aware of the presence of contaminated groundwater
containing PFAS east of the former Tyabb landfill
c. Disturbance of saturated soil and groundwater within the PFAS affected area will be
minimised. The management plan will include measures to prevent migration of PFAS into the
surrounding soil or surface water.
d. An intrusive groundwater investigation will be undertaken in the area between KP7.3 and
KP7.9 prior to commencing pipeline construction, to confirm presence or absence of
contaminated groundwater within the area, due to historical and existing land uses.
e. Water from areas that have been identified as contaminated will not be discharged to the
environment (land, waterways, sewer).
f. Contaminated water will either be treated onsite, depending on contaminant encountered
(this may require approval from the EPA Victoria) or disposed offsite to an EPA Victoria licensed
facility. Alternatively, a construction approach may be adopted where contaminated
groundwater is left in-situ (i.e. not abstracted or disturbed).
EMF
91 1 13.3170243 13.398238 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Swamp Scrub
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site GIS
92 0 13.4 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
HDD WC3 All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
93 1 13.596513 13.66061 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Swamp Scrub
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site GIS
94 0 13.6163682 13.638931 x x x Threatened
species
habitat
Swamp Wallaby
Grass population
Watercourse
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
95 1 13.6606103 13.699 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
GIS
96 0 13.699 14.4 X x Native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
- R13 Rehabilitation by assisted natural regeneration will be undertaken on the ROW, except within
four metres of the pipeline EMF
97 0 13.699 14.4 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
B2
B3
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
98 0 14.22 14.25 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential Swamp
Skink habitat
B10 Apply protocol for clearing Swamp Skink habitat
EMF
7
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
99 1 14.2233547 14.25825 X native
vegetation
Swampy
Riparian
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
100 1 14.2582499 14.37476 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
101 0 14.3 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
102 1 14.3802884 14.435258 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
103 0 14.57 14.6 x PMP Existing
vegetation
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to existing planted mature trees.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
104 0 14.98 15.11 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential Swamp
Skink habitat
B10 Apply protocol for clearing Swamp Skink habitat
EMF
105 1 14.9931191 15.078008 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
106 0 15 16 x Infrastructure Road reserve ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Keep ROW within road reserve to avoid entry into adjoining private land
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
107 1 15.0780075 15.160265 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
108 1 15.0821604 15.111293 X native
vegetation
Swampy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
109 0 15.1 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
110 1 15.1602647 15.196773 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
111 1 15.1967413 15.514687 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
112 0 15.5 15.55 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential Swamp
Skink habitat
B10 Apply protocol for clearing Swamp Skink habitat
EMF
113 1 15.5146873 15.55557 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
114 1 15.5575272 15.73668 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
115 1 15.8162291 15.835416 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
116 1 15.8571435 16.0477 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
117 0 16.16 16.21 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential Swamp
Skink habitat
B10 Apply protocol for clearing Swamp Skink habitat
EMF
118 1 16.1654236 16.20933 X native
vegetation
Aquatic
Herbland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
119 1 16.7537837 16.755656 x Cultural
Heritage
ACHRIS - Low
Density Artefact
Distribution
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan
GIS
120 1 16.7540244 16.755841 x Cultural
Heritage
ACHRIS - Low
Density Artefact
Distribution
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan
GIS
121 0 16.8 17.14 x PMP Broiler farm HDD A1 Avoid disturbance and biosecurity risks to broiler farm CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
8
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
122 1 17.2137527 17.247334 X native
vegetation
Grassy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
123 1 17.8196748 18.069792 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
124 0 17.8196748 18.069792 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential Swamp
Skink habitat
B10 Apply protocol for clearing Swamp Skink habitat
EMF
125 0 17.84 18.2 x Infrastructure Road Reserve ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
- Entry into adjoining private land avoided by keeping ROW within road reserve to avoid
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
126 1 18.0981793 18.239126 X native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
127 1 18.4167092 18.422686 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
128 1 18.5061933 18.512196 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
129 0 18.5148668 18.69895 X x Native
vegetation
Heathy
Woodland
- R13 Rehabilitation by assisted natural regeneration will be undertaken on the ROW, except within
four metres of the pipeline EMF
130 1 18.784802 18.812672 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Heathy
Woodland
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
GIS
131 0 18.897942 19.210908 x x x reserve Watson Creek
Unnamed
watercourse
Western Port
Ramsar Site
Native
vegetation
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
132 0 18.9 x Watercourse Watson Creek HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
133 0 19.2 x x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
134 1 19.3484313 19.362801 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Heathy
Woodland
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
GIS
135 1 19.3641004 19.381904 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Heathy
Woodland
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
GIS
136 1 19.6742604 19.689781 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
137 0 19.92 20.02 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential Swamp
Skink habitat
B10 Apply protocol for clearing Swamp Skink habitat
EMF
138 1 19.9217875 20.031506 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
139 0 20.0269819 20.080962 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
140 1 20.0371814 20.161908 X native
vegetation
Estuarine Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
141 0 20.1 20.1 x PMP Farm dam Alignment A1 Minimise impacts to proposed farm dam at landowner request CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
9
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
142 1 20.1592625 20.22594 X native
vegetation
Coastal
Saltmarsh
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
143 1 20.4740581 20.482853 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
144 0 20.8 x Watercourse Langwarrin
Creek
HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
145 0 20.9 21.25 X x Native
vegetation to
be retained
Langwarrin
Creek
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
146 0 21.4 21.6 X Threatened
species
habitat
GGF habitat - B13 a. Two nocturnal pre-clearance surveys of the construction footprint if clear and grade activities
at these locations are to occur during the breeding season (spring and summer)
b. Any Growling Grass Frog that can be located within the proposed construction footprint
during these surveys will be relocated to suitable location
c. If night time activities are required during the breeding season (spring and summer) within the
survey areas described in (a) ), a wildlife handler will be available to the construction site.
d. Hygiene protocols as set out in Murray et al. (2011) will be followed when conducting the
surveys described in (a).
EMF
147 0 21.4 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
148 0 21.5 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
149 0 21.66 21.75 x PMP Existing
vegetation
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to existing planted mature trees.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
150 1 21.7324446 21.745954 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
151 0 21.83 21.9 PMP PMP ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
- reduced RoW
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
152 1 21.8768785 21.882848 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
153 0 22.53 22.96 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Wetland
complex
Potential habitat
for GGF
HDD - Avoid impacts to a wetland complex which provides potential habitat for the GGF
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
154 1 22.7416485 22.766252 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Swampy
Riparian
Woodland
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
GIS
155 0 22.8 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
156 0 23.05 23.09 x PMP Residence ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoids direct impacts to residence
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
157 0 23.1 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
158 0 23.43 23.45 x PMP Farm dam ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance of existing farm dam at request of landowner
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
159 0 23.6 23.63 x PMP Planted exotic
trees
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to planted exotic tree windbreak at request of landowner
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
10
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
160 1 23.6059888 23.612384 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
161 0 23.67 23.72 x PMP Planted exotic
trees
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to planted exotic tree windbreak at request of landowner
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
162 0 23.9 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
163 0 24.04 24.1 PMP property
boundary
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
- Avoid adjacent land parcel
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
164 0 24.39 24.42 x Infrastructure Access road to
private property
Horizontal
bore
- Avoid disturbance to access road and mature planted vegetation lining road CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
165 0 24.5 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
166 0 24.59 29.61 X x Native
vegetation to
be retained
Shade line of
trees
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
B2
B3
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
167 0 24.7 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
168 0 24.9 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
Horizontal
bore
WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
169 0 24.95 25.03 x Infrastructure Baxter-Tooradin
Road
Horizontal
bore
- Avoid disturbance to Baxter-Tooradin Road CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
170 0 25.2 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
171 1 25.3168593 25.333347 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
172 0 25.5 x Watercourse Quail Inlet Drain - WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
173 0 25.5 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
174 1 25.8696281 26.03015 x Cultural
Heritage
Registered CH
Sites
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
175 0 26.7 x Watercourse Drain at Fisheries
Road
HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
176 0 26.71 26.98 x x Infrastructure Fisheries Road
Access road to
residence
HDD - Avoid disturbance to Fisheries Road and access road to residence
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
177 1 26.7923735 26.805197 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
178 1 27.2534575 27.264442 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
179 0 27.6 x Watercourse Christies Drain - WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
180 0 27.7 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
181 0 27.93 27.97 x Infrastructure Access road to
residence
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
- Minimise disturbance to access road to residence
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
182 0 28.05 28.08 x PMP Residence ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid direct disturbance to residence
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
183 0 28.12 28.23 x x PMP Residence
Dam
ROW
width
reduced
A1 Minimise disturbance near residence and to dam at request of landowner
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
11
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
to 20m
and 10m
184 0 28.46 28.5 x PMP Farm shed ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to farm shed at request of landowner
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
185 0 28.6 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
Horizontal
bore
WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
186 0 28.7 28.8 x PMP Farm shed and
store yard
Bore, with
access
track
reduce to
6m
A1 Avoid disturbance to farm shed and minimise disturbance to storage yard
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
187 0 29.06 29 x PMP Hedge ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid disturbance to hedge at paddock boundary at request of landowner
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
188 0 29.5 x Watercourse Rutherford Creek HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
189 0 29.57 30.24 x Infrastructure Existing pipelines
South Gippsland
Highway
HDD - Cross existing pipelines and the south Gippsland Highway
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
190 0 30.8 31.8 X Threatened
species
habitat
GGF habitat - B13 a. Two nocturnal pre-clearance surveys of the construction footprint if clear and grade activities
at these locations are to occur during the breeding season (spring and summer)
b. Any Growling Grass Frog that can be located within the proposed construction footprint
during these surveys will be relocated to suitable location
c. If night time activities are required during the breeding season (spring and summer) within the
survey areas described in (a) ), a wildlife handler will be available to the construction site.
d. Hygiene protocols as set out in Murray et al. (2011) will be followed when conducting the
surveys described in (a).
EMF
191 0 30.8 x Watercourse Western Outfall
Drain
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
192 0 31.528775 31.591748 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
193 0 31.6 31.65 x PMP Planted native
trees
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid impacts to planted native trees
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
194 0 33.4 33.61 x x x x x Threatened
species
habitat
Muddy Gates
Drain
Muddy Gates
Lane
Leogatha Rail
Line and
easement
SBB assumed
present
Potential habitat
for Swamp
Fireweed and
Swamp
Everlasting
HDD - Avoid impacts to Muddy Gates Drain, Muddy Gates Lane and the Leogatha Rail Line and
easement. This will avoid impacts to assumed habitat for the SBB, and potential habitat for the
SF and SE.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
195 0 33.62 34.31 x Threatened
species
habitat
SBB present,
recorded in
planted
vegetation
along fenceline
on southern side
of Manks Road
ROW
width
reduced
to
between
25 and
15m.
B2
B3
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
12
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
196 0 34 x Watercourse Muddy Gates
Drain
HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
197 0 34.31 34.35 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Manks Road
SBB assumed
present
Horizontal
bore
- Minimise impacts to vegetation on southern side of Manks Road which provides assumed
habitat for the SBB CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
198 0 34.35 34.35 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
199 0 34.6 x Watercourse Manks Rd Drain Horizontal
bore
WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
200 0 34.8 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
201 0 35.08 35.1 x PMP Farm dam ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid direct impacts to farm dam
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
202 0 35.3610934 35.403093 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Tooradin Station
Road
SBB recorded
near fallen pine
tree in a heavily
grassed roadside
plantation
Bore with
acces
track
reduce to
10m width
B2
B3
R14
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced
The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
203 0 35.5 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
204 0 35.7 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
205 0 35.76862 35.77998 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
206 0 36 x Watercourse Tooradin Road
Drain
Horizontal
bore
WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
207 0 36.4 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
208 0 36.7 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
209 0 37.1795025 37.200653 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Tooradin Inlet
Drain
SBB recorded in
blackberries and
Phalaris on top
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
B2
B3
R14
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
13
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
of drain bank to
south of
construction
footprint
The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
210 0 37.4866278 37.522938 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Ridgeways Drain
SBB assumed
present in
hawthorn hedge
with blackberries
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
B2
B3
R14
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced
The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
211 0 37.7 x Watercourse Tooradin Inlet
Drain
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
212 0 38.1 x Watercourse Ridgeways Drain - WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
213 0 38.6 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
214 1 38.6216075 38.624111 Threatened
species
habitat
SBB Habitat R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
GIS
215 0 38.7 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
216 0 38.8371324 38.893752 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
217 0 38.85 38.9 x x Infrastructure Dalmore Road
Dalmore Drain
Bore and
ROW
width
reduced
to
between
20 and
15m.
- Avoid trenching impacts to Dalmore Road
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
218 1 38.8848706 38.898682 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
14
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
219 0 39.3 x Watercourse Dalmore Rd
Drain
Horizontal
bore
WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
220 0 39.7 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
221 0 39.8 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
222 0 39.9 40.6 X Threatened
species
habitat
GGF habitat - B13 a. Two nocturnal pre-clearance surveys of the construction footprint if clear and grade activities
at these locations are to occur during the breeding season (spring and summer)
b. Any Growling Grass Frog that can be located within the proposed construction footprint
during these surveys will be relocated to suitable location
c. If night time activities are required during the breeding season (spring and summer) within the
survey areas described in (a) ), a wildlife handler will be available to the construction site.
d. Hygiene protocols as set out in Murray et al. (2011) will be followed when conducting the
surveys described in (a).
EMF
223 0 40 40.3 x x Threatened
species
habitat
SBB known
habitat
GGF known
habitat
Major drain -
Cardinia Creek
HDD B12 Growling Grass Frog
The following mitigation measures will be implemented to manage impacts to the Growling
Grass Frog:
a. If night time activities are required within or adjacent to areas of identified Growling Grass
Frog habitat, a wildlife handler will be available to the construction site if needed to relocate
individuals.
b. Initial construction (clearing / grade) will not occur within 100 metres of identified Growling
Grass Frog habitat adjacent to the construction footprint during the breeding season (spring
and summer), unless fauna (frog) exclusion fencing has been installed and a pre-clearance
frog survey have been undertaken immediately prior to works commencing that confirm the
species is not present within the fenced area.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
224 0 40.0562803 40.099025 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
225 0 40.0983932 40.108371 X Threatened
species
habitat
GGF habitat - B13 a. Two nocturnal pre-clearance surveys of the construction footprint if clear and grade activities
at these locations are to occur during the breeding season (spring and summer)
b. Any Growling Grass Frog that can be located within the proposed construction footprint
during these surveys will be relocated to suitable location
c. If night time activities are required during the breeding season (spring and summer) within the
survey areas described in (a) ), a wildlife handler will be available to the construction site.
d. Hygiene protocols as set out in Murray et al. (2011) will be followed when conducting the
surveys described in (a).
EMF
226 0 40.5 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
227 0 40.6 x Watercourse Cardinia Creek HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
228 0 40.85 40.85 X Threatened
species
habitat
GGF habitat
Cardinia Creek:
section of the
access track
linking to Ballarto
Road, where it
lies directly
adjacent to Lot
1 Title Plan
828572X
- B13 a. Two nocturnal pre-clearance surveys of the construction footprint if clear and grade activities
at these locations are to occur during the breeding season (spring and summer)
b. Any Growling Grass Frog that can be located within the proposed construction footprint
during these surveys will be relocated to suitable location
c. If night time activities are required during the breeding season (spring and summer) within the
survey areas described in (a) ), a wildlife handler will be available to the construction site.
d. Hygiene protocols as set out in Murray et al. (2011) will be followed when conducting the
surveys described in (a).
EMF
229 0 40.8826615 41.3 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Major drain -
Toomuc Creek,
Deep Creek
Desalination
Pipeline
Ballarto Road
Known habitat
for SBB and GGF
HDD B12 Growling Grass Frog
The following mitigation measures will be implemented to manage impacts to the Growling
Grass Frog:
a. If night time activities are required within or adjacent to areas of identified Growling Grass
Frog habitat, a wildlife handler will be available to the construction site if needed to relocate
individuals.
b. Initial construction (clearing / grade) will not occur within 100 metres of identified Growling
Grass Frog habitat adjacent to the construction footprint during the breeding season (spring
and summer), unless fauna (frog) exclusion fencing has been installed and a pre-clearance
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
15
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
Potential habitat
for DG and AG
frog survey have been undertaken immediately prior to works commencing that confirm the
species is not present within the fenced area.
230 0 40.9 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
231 0 41.2 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
232 0 41.35 41.5 X Threatened
species
habitat
GGF habitat - B13 a. Two nocturnal pre-clearance surveys of the construction footprint if clear and grade activities
at these locations are to occur during the breeding season (spring and summer)
b. Any Growling Grass Frog that can be located within the proposed construction footprint
during these surveys will be relocated to suitable location
c. If night time activities are required during the breeding season (spring and summer) within the
survey areas described in (a) ), a wildlife handler will be available to the construction site.
d. Hygiene protocols as set out in Murray et al. (2011) will be followed when conducting the
surveys described in (a).
EMF
233 0 41.7 x Watercourse Gum Scrub
Creek
HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
234 0 41.7 x Watercourse Toomuc Creek HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
235 0 41.79 41.81 x PMP Hedge ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid impacts to planted hedge windbreak
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
236 0 41.8 x Watercourse Deep Creek HDD WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
237 0 41.8 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
238 1 42.5861392 42.694879 x Cultural
Heritage
Registered CH
Sites
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
239 0 42.7273356 42.732157 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
240 0 43.2 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
241 0 43.42 43.42 x Threatened
species
habitat
A narrow strip of
dense
vegetation
along a
paddock drain.
Potential SBB
habitat.
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
B2
B3
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
242 0 44.1014767 44.15 x Infrastructure Soldiers Road Horizontal
bore
- Avoid trenching through Soldiers Road CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
243 0 45.2485203 45.255671 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
244 0 45.25 45.27 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Hagelthornes
Drain
potential Dwarf
Galaxias habitat
potential
Southern Brown
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
B2
B3
R14
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
16
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
Bandicoot
habitat
The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
245 0 45.7 x Watercourse Hagelthornes WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
246 0 46 46.05 x PMP Planted native
trees
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid impacts to planted native trees
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
247 0 46.1 46.17 x PMP Farm dam ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid impacts to existing farm dam at request of landowner
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
248 0 46.3 46.35 x PMP Farm driveway ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
A1 Avoid impacts to existing farm driveway
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
249 1 46.5491217 46.559941 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Swamp Scrub
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
HDD B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site GIS
250 0 46.5494499 46.558827 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Koo Wee Rup Rd
SBB known
habitat
HDD - HDD of Koo Wee Rup Road and area of planned road widening. Avoidance of SBB habitat in
road reserve. CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
251 0 46.7600982 46.81298 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
252 0 46.8 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat on
access track
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
253 0 47 x Watercourse McGregors Drain Horizontal
bore
WC1
WC3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
Trenchless construction methods to be used to avoid open cut construction across flowing
watercourses.
waterways list
254 0 47.7 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
255 0 47.8 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
256 1 49.1447655 49.19 X native
vegetation
Swampy
Riparian
Woodland
B1
B2
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
17
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
257 0 49.16 49.41 x x Threatened
species
habitat
Major drain -
Pakenham
Creek
SBB potential
habitat
DG potential
habitat
HDD - Avoid impacts to Pakenham Creek and associated vegetation on the banks of the drain.
Avoids potential habitat for SBB and GGF.
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
258 1 49.62 49.67 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Swampy
Riparian
Woodland
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
GIS
259 1 49.694719 49.717455 X Native
vegetation to
be retained
Swampy
Riparian
Woodland
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
B2 No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
GIS
260 0 49.8645758 49.887567 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
261 1 49.8667079 49.87325 X native
vegetation
Swampy
Riparian
Woodland
B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
262 1 49.8807012 49.906039 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
263 1 50.8449191 50.849618 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
264 1 51.2782209 51.282408 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
265 1 51.3461688 51.352008 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
266 0 51.8 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
267 1 51.8639826 51.895848 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
268 0 52.1 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
269 0 52.4411448 52.46 x Infrastructure Bald Hill Road Horizontal
bore
- Avoids trenching though Bald Hill Road. CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
270 0 52.5 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
271 1 52.6396594 52.645596 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
272 1 52.9903081 53.32 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
273 0 53.4678956 53.673655 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
EMF
18
ID Rev A
pp
rox
KP
Sta
rt*
Ap
pro
x K
P E
nd
*
Na
tiv
e v
eg
eta
tio
n
Flo
ra
Fa
un
a
Wa
terc
ou
rse
Ra
msa
r Site
So
il
We
ed
/ P
est
His
tori
c h
eri
tag
e o
r
ab
ori
gin
al h
eri
tag
e
Lan
dh
old
er/
Co
mm
un
ity
Ro
ad
an
d R
ail
Constraint
Type
De
scri
ptio
n
Design
Response
Site specific
Management
Standard
Management Standard Description Source
Reference
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
274 1 53.4678956 53.673655 X native
vegetation
Swamp Scrub B1
B6
All vegetation clearing works will be confined to the RoW.
Woody vegetation, trees and hollows to be removed are to be inspected for fauna by a
suitably qualified wildlife handler immediately prior to removal.
GIS
275 0 54.5 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
276 0 54.65 54.67 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
WC1
WC4
B3
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied.
The width of the right of way will be reduced CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
277 0 54.72 54.84 x Native
vegetation to
be retained
Native
vegetation
outside
construction
footprint
ROW
width
reduced
to 20m
B2
B3
No native vegetation to be retained will be cleared. Environmental features to be retained
within or directly adjacent to, the construction footprint, will be clearly demarcated and
identified on site
The width of the right of way will be reduced
CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
278 0 54.9647342 55.1 x Infrastructure Pakenham Rail
Line Crossing
Horizontal
bore
- Avoid trenching through Pakenham Rail Line CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
279 0 55 x Watercourse Unnamed
watercourse
- WC1
WC4
All works must be completed in accordance with CMA permit requirements.
EMP Environmental Standards for trenched watercourse crossings to be applied. waterways list
280 0 55.2649063 55.31 x Infrastructure Entrance to
HCMT facility
Horizontal
bore
- Enable continuous access to HCMT facility. CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
281 1 55.5802421 55.624244 x Cultural
Heritage
ACHRIS - Low
Density Artefact
Distribution
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan
GIS
282 0 55.7102849 55.81 x Infrastructure Princes Freeway Horizontal
bore
- Avoid trenching through Princess Freeway CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
283 1 56.1927778 56.198754 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
284 1 56.355033 56.361023 x Cultural
Heritage
CH Positive Test
Pit
CH1 Cultural heritage will be managed in accordance with the Cultural Heritage Management Plan GIS
285 0 56.5563876 56.7 x Infrastructure Princes Highway Horizontal
bore
- Avoid trenching through Princess Highway CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
286 2 26.7923735 26.805197 X Threatened
species
habitat
potential
Southern Brown
Bandicoot
habitat
R14 The following measures will be implemented to reinstate areas of Southern Brown Bandicoot
habitat where clearing has occurred:
a. Dense cover of suitable native shrubs or vegetation of similar structure will be reinstated,
other than directly above the pipeline and a narrow track to allow ground access for
surveillance patrols. Easement agreements with landholders will require that this vegetation be
reinstated and protected.
b. Rapid re-establishment of dense ground cover will be achieved at any of the sites of
known or assumed presence for the Southern Brown Bandicoot impacted by the construction
footprint, but not subject to HDD, by planting of semi-mature native shrubs, or fast-growing
tubestock, at an appropriate density during rehabilitation. The aim is to re-establish dense
understory vegetation in the 0.2–1m height range, as soon as practicable.
EMF
EES Hearing Expert Witness Statement
287 0 42.617 42.627 x Infrastructure Hobsons Road Horizontal
bore
- Avoid trenching though Hobsons Road, IF sealed prior to construction CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
288 0 51.417 51.427 x Infrastructure McDonalds
Drain Road
Horizontal
bore
- Avoid trenching though McDonalds Drain Road, IF sealed prior to construction CPT_Design_Mastersheet_TH
19
H Environmental Risk Assessment
H.1 Overview
APA has applied a robust approach to identification and management of Project
risks consistent with Australian Standard AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009, Risk management –
Principles and guidelines. The risk assessment process and risk criteria were tailored for
the Crib Point Terminal Pipeline project context. The risk criteria selected for the
assessment were aligned to APAs Corporate risk framework to ensure that APAs
business objectives would be met in the development of the project.
A qualitative approach to risk assessment has been adopted which involves the use
of a multi-disciplinary ‘subject matter specialist panel’ for assessing risks from the construction and operation of the pipeline. This risk process involved the following
steps:
establishment of the context of the risk assessment
risk pathway identification
analysis of the consequence and likelihood of risks
risk evaluation
risk treatment through the application of mitigation measures.
The results of the risk assessment focused the Environment Management Plan (EMP)
and informed development of Project controls to avoid, mitigate and manage of
environmental risks and impacts. The performance objectives and standards
(Appendix J) set the minimum outcomes necessary to avoid, mitigate or manage
environmental impacts during delivery of the Crib Point Terminal Pipeline.
H.2 Context of the risk assessment
This section provides an overview of the key design, construction and operational
assumptions, upon which the risk assessment is based. It also provides a description of
the pipeline corridor and the environmental context within which the risk assessment
was undertaken.
The approach adopted, consistent with the Standard, was to avoid risks where
possible or to locate and design the pipeline in such a way that risks initially identified
were removed or mitigated to an extent where the residual risk was considered
acceptable.
The pipeline corridor starts at Crib Point and terminates at Pakenham East in Victoria.
The preferred pipeline route was selected to minimise impacts on sensitive land uses
and where possible follows existing pipeline easements. The pipeline route is located
on land used for various purposes including rural residential living, road corridors,
industry, conservation reserves, hobby farming, horse studs and agriculture. The
pipeline follows the Stony Point rail reserve through Hastings. Towards Pakenham,
the pipeline crosses the Gippsland rail line before reaching the proposed Pakenham
20
Delivery Facility adjacent to the Pakenham East rail depot and connecting to the VTS
north of the Princes Highway.
The key construction activities for the pipeline include:
establishment of laydown areas
construction of the pigging facility at Crib Point Receiving Facility, Pakenham
Delivery Facility, two MLVs and the EOLSS
pipeline construction using construction techniques such as trenching,
horizontal directional drilling (HDD) or boring, typically within a 30-metre-wide
pipeline construction right of way (ROW).
Construction for the pipeline will take approximately 12 to 18 months, depending on
weather conditions. The pipeline will have a design life of 60 years. If the pipeline
were no longer required, it would be decommissioned in accordance with Australian
Standard AS2885 Pipelines – gas and liquid petroleum and relevant legislative and
approval requirements at the time of decommissioning.
H.3 Risk Pathway Identification
Risk pathways were identified and assessed by specialists during the EES process. The
initial risk assessment focused the impact assessment on areas of medium or higher
risks and planned events.
H.4 Analysis of the consequence and likelihood or risks
Consequence and likelihood criteria were developed and tailored to inform the risk
process based on the risk context. As the pipeline was developed, and impact
assessments progressed, the risk pathways underwent cycles of risk analysis,
evaluation, treatment and re-analysis. The project risk assessment process aligns with
APAs risk assessment requirements and was used to develop the EMP Environmental
Risk Register (Attachment H).
Risk is defined as a combination of:
the magnitude of potential consequences of an event
the likelihood of the event occurring.
The risk assessment process involved the assignment of consequence and likelihood
ratings which combined gave an overall risk level for each identified risk.
H.5.1. Consequence Ratings
The consequences of a risk occurring were assigned using a consequence guide
provided in Table 9-B.
21
Table 9-B Consequence framework
Level Qualitative description of biophysical/environmental consequence
Qualitative description of socio-economic consequence
Negligible No detectable change in a local
environmental setting
No detectable impact on economic, public
health and safety, cultural, recreational,
aesthetic or social values
Minor Short-term, reversible changes, within
natural variability range, in a local
environmental setting
Short-term, localised impact on economic,
public health and safety, cultural,
recreational, aesthetic or social values
Moderate Long-term but limited changes to local
environmental setting that are able to
be managed
Significant and/or long-term change in quality
of economic, public health and safety,
cultural, recreational, aesthetic or social
values in local setting. Limited impacts at
regional level
Major Long-term, significant changes
resulting in risks to human health
and/or the environment beyond the
local environmental setting
Significant, long-term change in quality of
economic, public health and safety, cultural,
recreational, aesthetic or social values at
local, regional and State levels. Limited
impacts at national level
Severe Irreversible, significant changes
resulting in widespread risks to human
health and/or the environment at a
regional scale or broader
Significant, permanent impact on regional
economy, public health and safety and/or
irreversible changes to cultural, recreational,
aesthetic or social values at regional, state
and national levels
H.5.2. Likelihood ratings
A likelihood rating for each identified risk was assigned using the guide in Table 9-C.
22
Table 9-C Likelihood guide
Level Description
Rare The event may occur only in exceptional circumstances
Unlikely The event could occur but is not expected
Possible The event could occur
Likely The event will probably occur in most circumstances
Almost certain The event is expected to occur in most circumstances or is planned to occur
H.5.3. Risk matrix and risk rating
The consequence and likelihood ratings were combined to arrive at a risk rating, using
the risk assessment matrix shown in Table 9-D.
Table 9-D Risk assessment matrix
Consequence ratings
Negligible Minor Moderate Major Severe
In
Rare Very low Very low Low Medium Medium
Unlikely Very low Low Low Medium High
Possible Low Low Medium High High
Likely Low Medium Medium High Very high
Almost certain Low Medium High Very high Very high
H.5 Risk Workshops
Once the initial risk ratings were established, they were tested through a number of
multi-disciplinary facilitated workshops. This promoted consistency across risk analysis
between disciplines and identification of any cross-over and inconsistencies in risk
pathways. The following thematic risk workshops were conducted:
23
Table 9-E Risk workshops – specialist studies
Workshop no.
Date Study area Study risk code
1 14 January 2019 Greenhouse gas emissions
Landscape and visual
GG
LV
2 24 January 2019 Agriculture
Air quality
Surface water
Transport
AG
AQ
HD
TP
3 12 February 2019 Historic heritage HH
4 27 February 2019 Business
Terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity
Groundwater
Noise and vibration
B
FF
HG
NV
5 7 March 2019 Aboriginal cultural heritage
Contamination and acid sulfate soils
Social
ACH
C
SC
6 11 April 2019 Land use and planning LU
7 18 July 2019 Terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity FF
8 20 September 2019 Marine biodiversity ME
9 8 October 2019 Marine biodiversity ME
H.6 Risk evaluation and treatment
The results of the risk analysis were evaluated to determine the next steps for each risk
pathway. Each risk was assessed with initial mitigation measures to determine the
initial risk rating, and a set of additional mitigation measures (if required), to arrive at
a residual risk rating.
H.6.1. Risk evaluation and treatment
Each risk was assessed with initial mitigation measures to determine its initial risk rating,
and a set of additional mitigation measures (if required), to arrive at a residual risk
rating. The identification, analysis and evaluation of risks were conducted over nine
facilitated workshops.
The residual risks identified in the risk assessment are managed by mitigation
measures which informed the performance standards and objectives outlined in
Attachment I.
The Risk Register, performance objectives and standards will inform the contractor’s
risk assessment and control processes for the construction of the Crib Point Pakenham
Pipeline. In addition to the risk assessment process, task-based risk assessments (e.g.
24
Job Safety and Environment Assessments) will be undertaken during the project to
identify and control workplace hazards.
H.6.2. Assurance
The risk register will be evaluated by APA as part of the assurance processes identified
in CEMP Section 7. Any proposed changes to the risk register will be approved by the
APA Project Manager and APA Environment Advisor
25
I Risk Register
26
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
C L Risk C L Risk
Envi
ro
Soci
al
Eco
n
Pu
blic
H&
S
OV
ERA
LL
Envi
ro
Soci
al
Eco
n
Pu
blic
H&
S
OV
ERA
LL
GG 1 GG1 Greenhouse gas
GHG from site clearance and construction site establishment
Disturbance of vegetation and consumption of fossil fuels for operation of plant and equipment during site clearing and construction site establishment resulting in the release of greenhouse gas emissions.
Progressive reinstatement as per mitigation measures described in EES Technical Report O: Agriculture impact assessment MM-GG01 Reduce right of way
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium B3
GG 2 GG2 Greenhouse gas
GHG from construction activities
Consumption of fossil fuels for electricity generation, operation of plant and equipment and transportation of materials and equipment during construction resulting in the release of greenhouse gas emissions.
MM- GG03 Source local materials
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium MM-GG04 Use of low embodied energy materials
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium SG1 SG2
GG 3 GG3 Greenhouse gas Additional use
of GHG due to unacceptable quality of materials delivered to site
Unacceptable quality of materials (e.g. steel) delivered to site leading to additional resource consumption and the release of greenhouse gas emissions.
MM-GG05 Managing the quality of materials
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Rar
e
Low
No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Rar
e
Low
SG3
AG 1 AG1 Agriculture Loss of land for agricultural use during construction
The installation of the pipeline results in loss of land for agricultural use.
MM-AG01 Landholder consultation
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium A1
27
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
AG 2 AG2 Agriculture Restricted acces to properties during construction
Pipeline construction activities cause reduced access, loss of productivity and greater management costs on blocks with affected access.
MM–AG01 Landholder consultation MM–AG02 Alternative access arrangements
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Medium No additional mitigation measures identified
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Medium A1
AG 3 AG3 Agriculture Disturbance (dust, noise, livestock injury)
Disturbance due to noise, dust and livestock injury impacts agricultural productivity.
MM-AG01 Landholder consultation MM-AG02 Stock access arrangements Dust suppression in accordance with mitigation measures listed in EES Technical Report G: Air quality impact assessment
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low A1, E2, E6
AG 4 AG4 Agriculture Infrastructure changes
Disruption to agricultural activities due to temporary removal or changes to use of infrastructure.
MM-AG04, MM-AG05 Identification and management of third-party services MM-AG06 Timing and method of construction for water infrastructure crossings MM-RH06 Reinstatement of infrastructure
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low A2, T1, A3, R11
AG 5 AG5 Agriculture Biosecurity (weeds & disease)
Transference of weed & diseases between properties impacts biosecurity of land.
MM-AG07 Biosecurity Management Protocol MM-AG08 Imported topsoil of an appropriate quality, weed & disease free.
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low R6, S1
AQ 1 AQ1 Air quality Dust from site clearance and construction site establishment
Site clearance and construction site establishment activities result in the generation of dust (particulates) resulting in deterioration of the existing air quality environment.
MM-AQ01 Dust suppression will be undertaken as required using water sprays, water carts or other media on: a. Unpaved work areas subject to traffic or wind b. Sand, spoil and aggregate stockpiles c. During the loading and unloading of dust generating materials.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-AQ02 Vehicle, plant and equipment movements will be restricted to within the construction footprint and on designated roads and tracks. MM-AQ04 Vehicles will be restricted to 40 km/hr in built up areas. MM-AQ07 Observational monitoring of dust along the construction right of way (ROW) and facilities will be undertaken. If dust is observed to leave the construction footprint, then works will be modified or stopped until the dust hazard is reduced to a manageable level.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low A8, E1, E2
28
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
AQ 2 AQ2 Air quality Dust from construction activities
Construction activities (e.g. excavation, drilling, vehicle movements) result in the generation of dust (particulates) resulting in deterioration of the existing air quality environment.
MM-AQ01 Dust suppression will be undertaken as required using water sprays, water carts or other media on: a. Unpaved work areas subject to traffic or wind b. Sand, spoil and aggregate stockpiles c. During the loading and unloading of dust generating materials.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-AQ02 Vehicle, plant and equipment movements will be restricted to within the construction footprint and on designated roads and tracks. MM-AQ04 Vehicles will be restricted to 40 km/hr in built up areas. MM-AQ07 Observational monitoring of dust along the construction right of way (ROW) and facilities will be undertaken. If dust is observed to leave the construction footprint, then works will be modified or stopped until the dust hazard is reduced to a manageable level.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low A8, E1, E2
AQ 3 AQ3 Air quality Extreme weather (hot windy conditions)
Climatic conditions result in the generation of dust (particulates) resulting in deterioration of the existing air quality environment.
MM-AQ01 Dust suppression will be undertaken as required using water sprays, water carts or other media on: a. Unpaved work areas subject to traffic or wind b. Sand, spoil and aggregate stockpiles c. During the loading and unloading of dust generating materials.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-AQ06 Weather conditions will be monitored for extreme heat and/or wind events and works will be modified. MM-AQ07 Dust monitoring
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low E1, E2
AQ 4 AQ4 Air quality Handling and removal of spoil (within highly populated areas)
Increased dust emissions near the construction worksite due to handling of spoil (within urban environment) resulting in deterioration of the existing air quality environment.
Reinstatement of excavated material will commence progressively post construction and will be undertaken as soon as practicable as per mitigation measures described in EES Technical Report O: Agriculture impact assessment (MM-RH01).
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium Pipeline alignment change to Stony Point Rail corridor to reduce amenity impacts as per EES Technical Report N: Business impact assessment. MM-AQ05 Construction vehicles with potential for loss of loads (such as dust or litter) will be covered when using public roads. MM-AQ07 Dust monitoring
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Rar
e
Low E2
AQ 5 AQ5 Air quality Combustion emissions from construction activities
Construction equipment, vehicles and plant results in the generation of combustion emissions resulting in deterioration of the existing air quality environment.
MM-AQ09 Plant and equipment will be maintained in good condition to minimise ignition risk, spills and air emissions that may cause nuisance.
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low E3, F9
AQ 6 AQ6 Air quality Odour from construction activities
Odour from contaminated soils (including acid sulfate soils) resulting in amenity impacts.
MM-AQ08 Odorous soils management a. Cessation of ground disturbance b. Assessment of contamination and determination of appropriate management actions in consultation with suitably qualified personnel. If odorous material is found to be contaminated, EPA will be notified as soon as reasonably possible.
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Un
like
ly
Very low
No additional mitigation measures identified
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Un
like
ly
Very low
T10
29
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
HD 1 HD1 Hydrology Site dewatering (runoff quality)
Dewatering of the trenches following a storm event results in water discharged from site above EPA water quality limits ultimately enters receiving water bodies.
MM-SW01 Discharge water i. Discharge will be to low gradient, stable, grassed areas as agreed with the landholder. c. Discharge of trench water to land will be avoid soil erosion or sedimentation of land or water. Sediment control devices to remove suspended solids and dissipate flow will be used where required. f. Water that cannot be treated to meet the relevant discharge criteria will be disposed to an EPA Victoria licensed facility. j. Contaminated water will be managed in accordance with EES Technical Report E: Contamination and acid sulfate soils impact assessment.
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low MM-SW01 Discharge water h. Trench water will not be discharged into or within 50m of watercourses, or into stormwater drains.
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low T5, H6
HD 2 HD2 Hydrology Stormwater runoff
Stormwater runoff (from trench intercepting surface waterway and excavated material from the ROW or construction sites) is above EPA water quality limits for sediments and enters waterways and the Western Port Ramsar site.
MM-SW02 Managing runoff a. Flow diversion banks will be placed upstream of the spoil material if required. b. An overflow spillway can be constructed to allow runoff from external catchments to pass over the spoil material at a controlled location without causing erosion. MM-SW03 Watercourse trenching during no flow conditions Where practicable, all trenched watercourse crossings will be constructed during no flow conditions. MM-SW04 Watercourse trenching a. Weather forecasts will be monitored to avoid having open trenches when high rainfall events are expected. b. Where watercourses are trenched, all obstructions to flow will be removed as soon as practicable after the pipe has been laid and backfilled. c. Trenching on both sides of the waterway will be fully excavated and prepared prior to undertaking the final section of trenching over the waterway. d. The pipeline will be assembled and prepared so that it can be installed as soon as practicable once the trenching over the watercourse has been undertaken. MM-SW05 Watercourse trenchless crossing The following watercourses will be crossed by HDD: Kings Creek, Warringine Park Swamp, Watson Creek, Vowell Drive Wetlands, Cardinia Creek, Toomuc Creek, Lower Gum Scrub Creek, Deep Creek.
Min
or
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low C7, WC2, WC3, WC4,
30
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
HD 3 HD3 Hydrology Stormwater runoff from Langwarrin Creek
Stormwater and tidal flow within waterways need to be temporary diverted during trenching of Langwarrin Creek and results in downstream erosion and flow that is above EPA water quality limits for sediments.
MM-SW04 Watercourse trenching a. Weather forecasts will be monitored to avoid having open trenches when high rainfall events are expected. b. Obstructions to flow will be removed and waterways reinstated as soon as practicable. j. Temporary diversions will be provided to allow flow around the trench to be maintained.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-SW05 Watercourse trenchless crossing The following watercourses will be crossed by trenchless construction techniques: Langwarrin Creek.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low WC2, WC3, WC4
HD 4 HD4 Hydrology Runoff from disturbed surfaces at HDD drilling sites
Sediment laden runoff from disturbed surfaces at HDD drilling sites flow into local waterways.
MM-SW02 Managing runoff a. Flow diversion banks should be placed upstream of the spoil material if required. b. An overflow spillway can be constructed to allow runoff from external catchments to pass over the spoil material at a controlled location without causing erosion. MM-SW05 Watercourse trenchless crossing The proposed HDD profile design, the work method statement should be submitted to Melbourne Water and approved prior to the commencement of works at watercourses managed by Melbourne Water.
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low C7, WC2, WC3
HD 5 HD5 Hydrology Spill to water (construction)
A spill of hazardous materials during construction results in contaminated discharge to surface water.
MM-SW06 Fuel and chemical storage a. Minimise quantities of hazardous materials Dangerous goods should be stored and handled in accordance with relevant Australian Standards. Chemical and fuel storage should be monitored as per EES Technical Report K: Safety, hazard and risk assessments. MM-SW07 Spills Spill kits will be available at locations where machinery/plant are operating, refuelling points and fuel and chemical storage locations. MM-SW08 Refuelling of vehicles and machinery b. Refuelling of vehicles and machinery (excluding hand held machines) on the ROW will utilise auto shut off valves. c. Refuelling of vehicles and mobile machinery will not occur within 50m of a watercourse.
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low F12
31
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
HD 6 HD6 Hydrology Waterway or flood plain function (construction)
Temporary excavated martial results in obstruction of waterways or floodplain function (construction).
MM-SW10 Stockpiling b. Provide regular gaps to allow flood water to pass through or constructing overflow spillways in the spoil material. c. Avoid stockpiling material near waterways. Material should be located away from the top of banks so that there is no restriction to the flow conveyance area. MM-SW03 Watercourse trenching during no flow conditions Where practicable, all trenched watercourse crossings will be constructed during no flow conditions. MM-SW04 Watercourse trenching a. Weather forecasts will be monitored to avoid having open trenches when high rainfall events are expected b. Where watercourses are trenched, all obstructions to flow will be removed as soon as practicable after the pipe has been laid and backfilled. c. Trenches on both sides of the waterway should be fully excavated and prepared prior to undertaking the final section of trenching over the waterway. d. The pipeline should be assembled and prepared so that it can be installed as soon as practicable once the trenching over the watercourse has been undertaken.
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low MM-SW10 Stockpiling a. Avoid the creation of a continuous row of stockpiled materials that can cause water to pond on the upstream side.
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Un
like
ly
Very low
C7, WC4, WC6
HD 9 HD9 Hydrology Runoff water quality
Reduced water quality discharged from the facilities sites.
MM-SW12 WSUD treatments will be incorporated into the site design for the Crib Point Receiving Facility and the Pakenham Delivery Facility to capture surface runoff and reduce pollutants in accordance with the Best Practice Environmental Management Guidelines (CSIRO 1999).
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low G2
TP 1 TP1 Traffic and Transport
Capacity of road network to accommodate workforce and heavy vehicle movements during construction
Additional traffic during construction may result in increased congestion exceeding level of service D, and ultmately compromise road safety within the vicinity of the Project Area.
MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low A8
TP 2 TP2 Traffic and Transport
Road/lane closures in Hastings impacting business and local access
Road/lane closures in Hastings result in impacts on business operation and access.
MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan MM-TP03 Stakeholder consultation on transport changes
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Medium Pipeline alignment change to Stony Point rail corridor as described in EES Technical Report N: Business impact assessment.
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Low A8
32
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
TP 3 TP3 Traffic and Transport
Road deterioration
Public roads experience deterioration in the quality of the pavement due to the movement of heavy vehicles, machinery and plant.
MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan MM-TP06 Pavement strength survey
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Min
or
Like
ly
Medium Upgraded pavement for Woolleys Road and the Esplanade (subject to the pavement strength survey results)
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low A8
TP 4 TP4 Traffic and Transport
Dirt on roads from construction vehicles
Plant and spoil trucks deposit construction debris on public roads leading to dust generation and perceived loss of amenity and public health and safety issues.
MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan - including dust and debris management MM-TP03 Stakeholder consultation on transport changes
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Medium MM-TP01 Transport Management Plan -Monitor condition of roads. If road becomes muddy, engage a street sweeper (as needed) Dust suppression methods as described in EES Technical Report G: Air quality impact assessment MM-AQ05 Covering vehicle loads)
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low A8
TP 5 TP5 Traffic and Transport
Pedestrian and cycling access in Hastings
Additional Project generated traffic and construction works impact pedestrians and cyclists resulting in a reduction in public safety and amenity. Increased safety risk to school children in school zones, walking to/from school and school crossings in the impacted area.
MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan Pedestrian and cyclist connectivity MM-TP03 Stakeholder consultation on transport changes
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Min
or
Lik
ely
Medium MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan - maintain pedestrian and cyclist connectivity Pipeline alignment change to Stony Point rail corridor as described in EES Technical Report N: Business impact
assessment.
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Lik
ely
Low A8
TP 6 TP6 Traffic and Transport
Public/School bus impacts
Movement of pipes, plant and heavy machinery, as well as potential road closures impacts on public transport and access for school buses.
MM-TP07 Public Transport Disruption Plan MM-TP03 Stakeholder and Engagement Management Plan - Consultation with schools and PTV
Min
or
Maj
or
Maj
or
Un
like
ly
Medium MM-TP01 TMP - Avoid truck (pipeline and other activities) movements in Hastings between school hours (7:30-9:00am and 2:30 -4:00 pm) and avoid school zone areas, where possible. Driver training
Min
or
Maj
or
Maj
or
Rar
e
Medium A8
TP 7 TP7 Traffic and Transport
Road/lane closures outside of Hastings due to Pipeline Works (along and across roads) impacting transport operations
Road/lane closures outside of Hastings due to Pipeline Works (along road due to narrow ROW and across roads due to open cut trenching) impacting access to properties.
MM-TP01 Management Plan MM-TP03 Stakeholder consultation on transport changes
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Medium MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan - Construction activities to occur in off-peak periods when demands are low. Minimise the number and duration of road closures
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Low A8
33
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
TP 8 TP8 Traffic and Transport
Access track / public road network intersection crash risks
Risk of crash at intersection of access tracks and public roads due to non-complying sight lines, stopping distance and lack of lighting.
MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan
Neg
ligib
le
Maj
or
Maj
or
Po
ssib
le
High MM-TP04 Road Safety Audit - minor relocation of non-compliant access tracks to achieve conforming sight distance requirements. Provide flag lighting during active access track use.
Min
or
Maj
or
Maj
or
Rar
e
Medium A8
TP 9 TP9 Traffic and Transport
Crash with a train at a level crossing
Crash with a train at a level crossing due to increased traffic activity and new access tracks.
MM-TP01 Traffic Management Plan
Min
or
Seve
re
Seve
re
Un
like
ly
High MM-TP02 Level crossing audit to identify required measures to conform to safety standards
Maj
or
Seve
re
Seve
re
Rar
e
Medium A8
HH 1 HH1 Historic heritage
Direct disturbance of identified historic heritage
Disturbance of identified historic heritage places (included in the Heritage Overlay, VHR, VHI) by construction works resulting in loss of heritage value.
No initial mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
High MM-HH01 Horizontal directional drilling
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Low HH2
HH 2 HH2 Historic heritage
Disturbance of unidentified historic heritage
Disturbance of unidentified historic heritage places and sites by construction works resulting in loss of heritage value.
MM-HH02 Unexpected cultural heritage finds procedure
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low HH3
HH 3 HH3 Historic heritage
Indirect disturbance of identified historical heritage
Indirect disturbance of identified historical heritage places and sites (included in the Heritage Overlay, Victorian Heritage Register, Victorian Heritage Inventory) by construction works resulting in loss of heritage value.
MM-HH03 Dilapidation survey for VHR site (Former BP refinery administration building H1016, HO240).
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low HH1
NV 2 NV2 Noise and vibration
Construction noise (pipeline)
General construction works along the pipeline causes an increase in noise or vibration that affects the amenity at sensitive receptors.
MM-NV01 Manage noise with reference to EPA Vic guidelines 1254 (Section 2) and EPA Publication 1834 “Civil construction, building and demolition guide” MM-NV02 EPA construction noise guideline levels
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-NV04 Adopt at-receptor management measures when onsite mitigation measures cannot control emissions (e.g. works notification, individual briefings and/or respite)
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low E4, E6, E7, E8
34
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
NV 3 NV3 Noise and vibration
Construction noise (facilities)
Construction of Pakenham and Crib Point facilities cause an increase in noise or vibration that affects the amenity at sensitive receptors.
MM-NV01 Manage noise with reference to EPA Vic guidelines 1254 (Section 2) and EPA Publication 1834 “Civil construction, building and demolition guide” MM-NV02 EPA construction noise guideline levels
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low E4, E6, E7, E8
NV 4 NV4 Noise and vibration
Out of hours construction noise (pipeline)
Out of hours night work causes an increase in noise that affects amenity and causes sleep disturbance at sensitive receptors.
MM-NV01 Manage noise with reference to EPA Vic guidelines 1254 (Section 2) and EPA Publication 1834 “Civil construction, building and demolition guide” MM-NV02 EPA construction noise guideline levels
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Alm
ost
cer
tain
High MM-NV05 Design site specific acoustic treatment to reduce the noise transmission from HDD and boring works by at least 10dB in Hastings MM-NV04 Adopt at-receptor management measures when onsite mitigation measures cannot control emissions (e.g. works notification, individual briefings, respite or temporary alternative accommodation) MM-NV06 Noise and vibration monitoring
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Like
ly
Medium E4, E6, E7, E8, E10
NV 5 NV5 Noise and vibration
Cumulative construction noise
Construction works for concurrent projects causes longer or higher levels of noise disturbance at sensitive receptors.
MM-NV01 Manage noise with reference to EPA Vic guidelines 1254 (Section 2) and EPA Publication 1834 “Civil construction, building and demolition guide” MM-NV02 EPA construction noise guideline levels
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-NV07 Consultation and collaboration with other projects to manage cumulative impacts where applicable
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low E4, E6, E8
NV 6 NV6 Noise and vibration
Construction vibration (amenity)
Vibration from construction works causes human disturbance.
MM-NV01 Manage vibration with reference to EPA Vic guidelines 1254 (Section 2) and EPA Publication 1834 “Civil construction, building and demolition guide” MM-NV03 Adopt set back distances derived using BS6472-1:2008 criteria.
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low MM-NV08 Equipment substitution to minimise vibration impacts • Consultation
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Rar
e
Very low
E4, E6, E9,
NV 7 NV7 Noise and vibration
Construction vibration (damage)
Vibration from construction works cause structural damage to buildings and underground services.
MM-NV01 Manage vibration with reference to EPA Vic guidelines 1254 (Section 2) and EPA Publication 1834 “Civil construction, building and demolition guide” MM-NV03 Adopt set back distances derived using BS6472-1:2008 criteria.
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low MM-NV08 Equipment substitution MM-NV06 Vibration monitoring of sensitive buildings / structures inside safe working distances. MM-NV09 Condition survey of properties within safe working distances.
Min
or
Min
or
Rar
e
Very low
E4, E6, E9,
35
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
B 1 B1 Business Disruptions to business operations
Changes to road and/or car parking conditions during construction restricts access for customers, staff and deliveries, disrupting business operations.
Early communication with businesses. Maximise temporary access for staff, deliveries and customers in accordance with mitigation measures listed in EES Technical Report J: Transport impact assessment (MM-TP01) MM-BU01 Pipeline alignment change to Stony Point rail corridor
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Medium Planning for the construction period would consider the treatment of parking spaces during the construction phase to limit any adverse effects and would consider alternative parking arrangements if needed, in accordance with mitigation measures listed in EES Technical Report J: Transport impact assessment (MM-TP01). N
eglig
ible
Neg
ligib
le
Po
ssib
le
Low A7
B 2 B2 Business Changes to amenity (air quality and noise impacts)
Construction activities cause adverse changes to amenity experienced from businesses where amenity is part of the customer experience.
Use of water trucks to spray roads during especially dusty works in accordance with mitigation measures listed in EES Technical Report G: Air quality impact assessment (MM-AQ01). Managing noise from construction activities in accordance with mitigation measures listed in EES Technical Report H: Noise and vibration impacts assessment (MM-NV01). MM-BU01 Pipeline alignment change to Stony Point rail corridor
Neg
ligib
le
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Neg
ligib
le
Po
ssib
le
Low E1, E4, E6
HG 1 HG1 Hydrogeology Groundwater users
Dewatering reduces groundwater levels at registered groundwater bores.
No initial mitigation measures identified
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low MM–HG01 Dewatering activities will be limited in duration
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Un
like
ly
Very low
T5
HG 2 HG2 Hydrogeology Potential GDEs
Dewatering reduces groundwater levels at potential GDEs and/or watercourses.
No initial mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low MM-HG01 Dewatering activities will be limited in duration
Low MM-HG01 Dewatering activities will be limited in duration
Min
or
Neg
ligib
le
Min
or
Rar
e
Very low
T5
HG 4 HG4 Hydrogeology Drilling mud Uncontrolled loss of drilling muds during trenchless installation, which affects groundwater quality.
MM-HG03 Use contractor(s) suitably qualified and experienced in trenchless installation techniques
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low MM-HG02 Drilling muds used in horizontal directional drilling should be biodegradable and non-toxic, where geotechnical conditions allow
Min
or
Min
or
Rar
e
Very low
D7
HG 5 HG5 Hydrogeology Overland flow to groundwater
Poor quality overland flow entering groundwater via trench or bell holes.
No initial mitigation measures identified M
ino
r
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low Trenched watercourse crossings should be constructed during no or low flow conditions as per EES Technical Report C: Surface water impact assessment. MM-HG04 Minimise the time that trench sections and bell holes are open
Min
or
Min
or
Rar
e
Very low
T4
36
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
HG 6 HG6 Hydrogeology Water supply If groundwater used for construction phase - drawdown from water supply reduces groundwater levels at groundwater users (incl. potential GDEs and registered bores).
MM-HG05 Sourcing of groundwater for construction supply (if required) will be in accordance with relevant legislation.
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Rar
e
Very low
No additional mitigation measures identified
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Rar
e
Very low
G3
HG 7 HG7 Hydrogeology Loss of registered bores
Registered bores become damaged, lost (destroyed) or inaccessible thereby impacting bore user.
No initial mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Like
ly
Medium MM-HG06 Visual confirmation of location of potentially impacted bores and make-good arrangements.
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Rar
e
Very low
G4
C 1 C1 Contamination Contaminated soil
Disturbance, handling, storage or disposal of contaminated soils that affects human health via direct contact; surface water due to contaminated runoff; and groundwater due to leaching of contaminants from soils
MM-C01 Environmental Management Plan with reference to the SEPP (PMCL), Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations 2009 and EPA Victoria Publication 621 - Soil Hazard Categorisation and Management.
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low T9, T11, W8
C 2 C2 Contamination Acid Sulfate Soils
Disturbance, handling, storage, treatment or disposal acid sulfate soils that results in generation of acidic waters that affects human health via direct or secondary contact, surface water and/or groundwater quality.
MM-C02
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Min
or
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low T13
37
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
C 3 C3 Contamination PASS activation
Generation of acid leachate through oxidation of previously submerged soils (dewatering from trenches and bell holes) leads to generation of acidic waters that affects human health via direct and secondary contact, surface water and/or groundwater quality.
MM-C02 Environmental Management Plan with reference to Industrial Waste Management Policy (Waste Acid Sulfate Soils) 1999 and EPA Victoria - Publication 655.1 Acid Sulfate Soil and Rock Minimise duration and extent of dewatering activities - dewater immediately prior to installation of pipe Minimise the time that trench sections and bell holes are open
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Rar
e
Very low
No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Rar
e
Very low
T13
C 4 C4 Contamination Contaminated groundwater
Contaminated groundwater encountered during pipeline construction that affects human health via direct and secondary contact and the environment, due to inappropriate handling, storage and disposal.
MM-C04 Environmental Management Plan with reference to the SEPP (Waters), Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations 2009 and PFAS NEMP Treat contaminated groundwater onsite, disposed offsite to an EPA Victoria licensed facility or adopt construction approach where contaminated groundwater may be left in situ
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low T12
C 5 C5 Contamination Dewatering of non-contaminated, acidic and/or brackish water
Dewatering activities affects soil, surface water and/or groundwater quality.
MM-C04 Environmental Management Plan with reference to SEPP (Waters) and Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations 2009 Treat dewatered non-contaminated, acidic and/or brackish groundwater prior to discharge in accordance with mitigation measures in EES Technical Report: Surface water impact assessment, or dispose water that cannot be treated to meet the relevant discharge criteria to an EPA Victoria licensed facility M
ino
r
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low T12
C 6 C6 Contamination Contaminant migration
Dewatering (during trenching and thrust-boring works) results in intersection of contaminated groundwater and/or mobilisation of contaminant plumes from outside the Project Area impacting on beneficial uses.
MM-C04 Environmental Management Plan with reference to SEPP (Waters) and Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations 2009. Treat contaminated groundwater prior to discharge, dispose to an EPA Victoria licensed facility or adopt construction approach where contaminated groundwater may be left in situ
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low T12
38
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
C 7 C7 Contamination Drilling Mud Inappropriate management, handling and disposal of drilling mud that affects human health and the environment.
MM-C05 Environmental Management Plan with reference to Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations 2009 and EPA Victoria industrial Waste – Classification for Drilling Mud. Prevent discharge from trenchless drilling sites as per EES Technical Report C: Surface water impact assessment. Use biodegradable and non-toxic drilling mud, where geotechnical conditions allow as per EES Technical Report D: Groundwater impact assessment. Drilling conducted by HDD specialist contractor as per EES Technical Report D: Groundwater impact assessment.
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low
No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low
W9, D1
C 8 C8 Contamination Contaminated hydrostatic test water
Inappropriate handling, storage and disposal of water from hydrostatic test affects human health via direct and secondary contact, soil surface water and/or groundwater quality.
MM-C06 Environmental Management Plan with reference to SEPP (Waters). Oxygen scavengers and biocides would be added as required to hydrotesting water, and would be neutralised before disposal Water quality criteria to be met for discharge to land as per EES Technical Report C: Surface water impact assessment.
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low F10, H3, H4, H5, H7
C 9 C9 Contamination Unknown contamination
Unknown contamination encountered and disturbed during construction results in an impact to human health and the environment.
MM-C07 Develop and implementation of Environmental Management Plans Cessation of ground disturbance at the unknown contamination location and within the immediate vicinity. Assessment of the discovered contamination and determination of appropriate remedial action.
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low T10
C 10 C10 Contamination Dust from contaminated stockpile
Dust from contaminated soil/stockpile blown by wind affects human health via direct contact, soil and/or surface water quality
Dust suppression (e.g. water sprays, stockpiles sprays) and covering vehicle loads as per EES Technical Report G: Air quality impact assessment. Odorous soils to be managed as per EES Technical ReportG: Air quality impact assessment.
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low MM-AQ05 Covering vehicle loads
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low E2
C 11 C11 Contamination Spill (construction)
Leaks or spillages during construction from machinery/plant, fuel and chemical storage impact human health via direct and secondary contact, and the environment.
MM-C08 Development and implementation of Environmental Management Plans Fuel/chemicals management procedures Spills management and refuelling of vehicles and mobile machinery as per EES Technical Report C: Surface water impact assessment.
Min
or
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low F8
39
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
C 12 C12 Contamination Waste streams (construction)
Management of waste streams (solid inert, liquid, organic, packaging etc.) generated during Project construction affects aesthetics and the environment.
MM-C09 Development and implementation of Environmental Management Plans Waste management procedures.
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Po
ssib
le
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Po
ssib
le
Low W1, W3, W4, W7
ACH 1 ACH1 Aboriginal cultural heritage
Disturbance of unknown common ACH places
Disturbance of not previously registered common Aboriginal cultural heritage places resulting in loss of heritage value
MM-AH01 Unexpected finds procedure as stated in CHMPs 15383 and 15384 and 16300 contingencies to be followed. This would include stopping works within the specified buffer and undertaking investigations with AV and/or the RAP Cultural heritage induction
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low CH1
ACH 2 ACH2 Aboriginal cultural heritage
Disturbance of unknown rare ACH places
Disturbance of not previously registered rare ACH places resulting in loss of heritage value.
MM-AH01 Unexpected finds procedure as stated in CHMPs 15383 and 15384 and 16300 contingencies to be followed. This would include stopping works within the specified buffer and undertaking investigations with AV and/or the RAP Cultural heritage induction
Maj
or
Maj
or
Rar
e
Medium No additional mitigation measures identified
Maj
or
Rar
e
Medium CH1
ACH 3 ACH3 Aboriginal cultural heritage
Unauthorised disturbance of known ACH within the CHMPs 15383 and 15384 activity areas
Unauthorised disturbance of previously registered Aboriginal cultural heritage places within the activity area, resulting in loss of heritage value.
MM-AH01 Implement and comply with CHMPs 15383 and 15384) following approval under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low CH1
ACH 4 ACH4 Aboriginal cultural heritage
Unauthorised disturbance outside CHMPs 15383 and 15384 and 16300 activity areas
Unauthorised disturbance of previously registered Aboriginal cultural heritage places outside of activity area in the CHMP resulting in loss of heritage value.
MM-AH01 Cultural heritage induction. MM-AH02 Facilities areas will be fenced off. Facilities areas will be fenced off. Construction areas will be demarcated. Compliance inspections by RAP.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Rar
e
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Rar
e
Low CH1, CH3
40
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
ACH 5 ACH5 Aboriginal cultural heritage
Disturbance of not previously registered intangible ACH places
Disturbance of not previously registered intangible Aboriginal cultural heritage places (e.g. aesthetic, social, religious, historic or cultural values) resulting in loss of heritage value.
MM-AH01 Cultural heritage induction.
Maj
or
Maj
or
Rar
e
Medium No additional mitigation measures identified
Maj
or
Rar
e
Medium CH1
ACH 6 ACH6 Aboriginal cultural heritage
Disturbance to Aboriginal Ancestral remains
Disturbance of not previously registered Aboriginal ancestral remains resulting in loss of heritage value.
MM-AH01 Unexpected finds procedure as stated in CHMPs 15383 and 15384 and 16300 contingencies to be followed. This would include stopping works within the specified buffer and undertaking investigations with AV and/or the RAP. Cultural heritage induction
Seve
re
Seve
re
Rar
e
Medium No additional mitigation measures identified
Seve
re
Rar
e
Medium CH1
LU 1 LU1 Land use Land use (construction)
The proposed construction activities result in temporary land use changes, access or amenity impacts that are inconsistent with existing land uses and policy (in the local or regional setting), or reasonably foreseeable future land use directions for public and private land.
Minimise amenity impacts (refer to noise, air and agricultural mitigation measures).
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low
FF 1 FF1 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Native vegetation removal
Unauthorised removal of native vegetation within the construction footprint during construction.
Avoid, minimise and offset of native vegetation in accordance with the Guidelines for the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation (DELWP 2017). Pipeline Licence application to include all areas where the remocal of native vegetation is required. Implement and comply with the conditions of the Pipeline Licence.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low R12, R13
41
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
FF 2 FF2 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Habitat removal (detected threatened fauna)
Removal of native vegetation during construction impacts habitat for threatened fauna (detected) Including: - Lewin's Rail - Eastern Great Egret - Blue-billed Duck Excluding Southern Brown Bandicoot and Growling Grass Frog.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines and the Significant Impact Guidelines 1.1 (EPBC Matters): These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets. Project designed with HDD in further locations (including Watsons Creek, KP22.5, KP20.93) as well as a ROW reduction in multiple locations.
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss MM-FF03 Invasive weeds, pests, pathogens MM-FF05 Site rehabilitation
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium S2, S3, S4, S5, R12, R13
FF 3 FF3 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Habitat removal (unknown threatened fauna)
Removal of native vegetation during construction impacts habitat for threatened fauna (undetected), including: - Swamp Skink - Powerful Owl - Caspian Tern - Chestnut-rumped Heathwren
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets. Project designed with HDD in areas of dense vegetation.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss MM-FF03 Invasive weeds, pests, pathogens MM-FF05 Site rehabilitation
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low S2, S3, S4, S5, R12, R13
FF 4 FF4 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Habitat removal (non-threatened fauna)
Removal of native vegetation during construction impacts habitat for non-threatened fauna.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets.
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss MM-FF05 Site rehabilitation MM-FF06 Topsoil rehabilitation
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
FF 5 FF5 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Habitat removal (undetected threatened flora).
Potential removal of threatened flora and/or habitat during construction (including: - Marsh Sun-orchid - Austral Crane's-bill - Crested Sun-orchid - Crimson Sun-orchid - Creeping Rush). Habitat includes areas of Grassy Woodland, Heathy Woodland and near coastal Heathland. Excluding Pallid Sun-orchid and Gaping Sun-orchid.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss MM-FF05 Site rehabilitation MM-FF06 Topsoil rehabilitation Additional mitigation measure includes targeted surveys for species to establish presence in suitable locations, notably between KP1 and KP1.9.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low R12, R13
FF 6 FF6 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Habitat removal (non-threatened flora)
Removal of native vegetation during construction impacts habitat for non-threatened flora.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets.
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Low MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Low B1, B2, B3, B4
FF 7 FF7 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Fauna injury (construction)
Construction activities physically injure fauna.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets.
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low MM-FF08 Injury to fauna
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low B6, B7, B8, B9
FF 8 FF8 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Trench excavation works
Fauna becoming trapped in open trenches during construction causing injury or death.
No initial mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low MM-FF07 Trench entrapment MM-FF09d Southern Brown Bandicoot
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low B7, B8, T3, B11
43
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
FF 9 FF9 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Southern Brown Bandicoot
Removal of habitat resulting in impact to Southern Brown Bandicoot habitat / populations (including habitat fragmentation).
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines and the and the Significant Impact Guidelines 1.1 (EPBC Matters): These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets. Targeted surveys resulted in further design revisions avoided SBB habitat (such as Cardinia Creek).
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
High MM-FF09 Southern Brown Bandicoot Project to have temporary (short-term) impacts, avoiding impacts on population viability
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Medium B11
FF 10 FF10 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Growling Grass Frog
Removal of habitat or introduction of Chytrid fungus resulting in impact to Growling Grass Frog habitat / populations.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines and the and the Significant Impact Guidelines 1.1 (EPBC Matters): These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets. Targeted surveys for GGF resulted in narrowing of Right of Way or HDD at KP22.5, KP23.5, KP28.1 & from KP 34.6 to KP 35), HDD from KP 22.5 - KP 22.9, and at Cardinia Creek South and Cardinia Creek, Dee Creek/Tomuc Creek and Pakenham Creek).
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-FF03 Invasive weeds, pests, pathogens MM-FF11 Growling Grass Frog
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low B13, S2, S3, S4, S5
FF 11 FF11 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Dwarf Galaxias and Australian Grayling
Construction activities resulting in impacts to Dwarf Galaxias and/or Australian Grayling.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines and the Significant Impact Guidelines 1.1 (EPBC Matters): These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-FF02 Aquatic fauna impacts MM-FF03 Invasive weeds, pests, pathogens
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low S2, S3, S4, S5, WC4
FF 12 FF12 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Merran's Sun-orchid
Construction activities impacting on individuals, or habitat of Merran's Sun-orchid.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets Additional design alterations to avoid most (approximately 60%) of habitat and individuals of this species, including HDD and reduction in ROW between KP 1.1 to KP 1.6.
Seve
re
Seve
re
Alm
ost
Cer
tain
Very high
MM-FF05 Site rehabilitation MM-FF06 Topsoil rehabilitation MM-FF10 Merran’s Sun-orchid, Pallid Sun-orchid and Gaping Sun-orchid
Construction activities impacting on individuals, or habitat of Gaping Sun-orchid and Pallid Sun-orchid.
Additional design alterations to avoid habitat and individuals for both species, including HDD and reduction in ROW between KP 1.1 to KP 1.6. EMP for Project (Mitigation measures: MM-FF01, MM-FF04, MM-FF05, MM-FF06, MM-FF10). Species habitat benefits from mitigation for Merran's Sun-orchid.
Seve
re
Seve
re
Un
like
ly
High MM-FF10 Pallid Sun-orchid and Gaping Sun-orchid
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
FF 14 FF14 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
River Swamp Wallaby-grass
Removal of habitat resulting in impact to River Swamp Wallaby-grass.
Additional design alteration to HDD under the population of River Swamp Wallaby-grass recorded in Bluescope at KP 13.6.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Rar
e
Low MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss MM-FF05 Site rehabilitation
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Rar
e
Low B1, B3, R12, R13
FF 15 FF15 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Habitat fragmentation
Removal of vegetation results in edge effects, habitat fragmentation and loss of connectivity, leading to disruption to ecosystem function.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets
Min
or
Min
or
Like
ly
Medium MM-FF03 Invasive weeds, pests, pathogens MM-FF05 Site rehabilitation MM-FF06 Topsoil rehabilitation MM-FF09 Southern Brown Bandicoot
Environmental weeds, pathogens and pest animals in vegetation/habitat disrupt ecosystem function.
The pipeline alignment was selected and refined to minimise loss of remnant vegetation in accordance with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets
Loss/damage to vegetation outside of the construction footprint.
As a minimum the project will comply withAS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Po
ssib
le
Low MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low B1, B3
FF 18 FF18 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Waders and waterbirds / migratory birds
Construction activities impact on waders/waterbirds/migratory bird species.
As a minimum the project will comply with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss MM-FF03 Invasive weeds, pests, pathogens MM-FF08 Injury and/or disturbance to fauna MM-FF12 Migratory birds MM-FF13 Surface water sedimentation and runoff
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Un
like
ly
Very low
B1, B3, B6, B14, C13, T5
FF 19 FF19 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Impacts to Western Port Ramsar Site
Construction activities impact on Western Port Ramsar Site
As a minimum the project will comply with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Po
ssib
le
Medium MM-FF01 Unplanned vegetation loss MM-FF03 Invasive weeds, pests, pathogens MM-FF08 Injury and/or disturbance to fauna MM-FF12 Migratory birds MM-FF13 Surface water sedimentation and runoff
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Un
like
ly
Very low
B1, B3, B6, C13, T5
45
EES EMF Short Name Count
EES EMF Risk ID
Specialist study Risk name Risk pathway Initial mitigation measure Initial Risk Additional mitigation measure Residual Risk
Relative Performance
Standard and
Objectives Ref #
FF 20 FF20 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Construction noise and vibration impacts on fauna (excluding waders and waterbirds)
Construction noise and vibration impacts on fauna (excluding waders and waterbirds).
As a minimum the project will comply with AS2885.1-2012 Section 4.2 and the APGA Code of Environmental Practice: Onshore Pipelines. These documents specify the design, safety and environmental management requirements for the construction and operation of gas pipeline assets. Compliance with EPA 1254
Min
or
Min
or
Alm
ost
cer
tain
Medium MM-FF08 Injury and/or disturbance to fauna
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low B6, B7, B8, B9
FF 21 FF21 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
GDE's Construction activities impacting on the surface expression of GDE's (i.e. all areas of Swamp Scrub and Heathy Woodland).
No initial mitigation measures identified
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Po
ssib
le
Low Mitigation measures as per EES Technical Report D: Groundwater impact assessment.
Neg
ligib
le
Neg
ligib
le
Po
ssib
le
Low T5
FF 22 FF22 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Night lighting disturbing native fauna (excluding waders and waterbirds)
Night lighting causing abandonment of affected habitats. Stress/displacement of native fauna and disruption of ecosystem function.
No initial mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Like
ly
Medium Manage light generated during construction in general accordance with the Australian Standard AS 4282-1997 Control of the Obtrusive Effects of Outdoor Lighting
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low B14
FF 23 FF23 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Spill to water A spill of hazardous materials associated results in contaminated discharge to surface water
No initial mitigation measures identified
Min
or
Min
or
Po
ssib
le
Low MM-FF14 Surface water contamination
Min
or
Min
or
Un
like
ly
Low F1, F2, F4, F10, F11, F12
FF 24 FF24 Terrestrial and freshwater ecology
Dust Dust from construction activities impact on flora/fauna.
Dust suppression (e.g. water sprays, stockpiles sprays) and covering vehicle loads as per EES Technical Report G: Air quality impact assessment.
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low No additional mitigation measures identified
Mo
der
ate
Mo
der
ate
Un
like
ly
Low E2, E3
46
47
J Performance objectives and standards
48
ATTACHMENT J TO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
INDEX
Topic Page
Table 9-F: Performance standards (all activities) Site access and property management
Air, Noise & Vibration Management
Biodiversity
Cultural heritage
Historic heritage
Biosecurity
Surface water and Groundwater
Fuels & chemicals
Waste Sustainability and greenhouse gas
Table 9G: Clear and Grade, Right of Way Maintenance
8.0 Timing of environmental activities 16 9.0 Reporting 16 10.0 Consultation and approvals 16 11.0 References 17
Appendix A Figures A
Appendix B Tables B
Appendix C Field Screening Testing and Interpretations C
Appendix D Acid sulfate soils field indicators D
AECOM
Abbreviations
Abbreviation Definition
AASS Actual acid sulfate soils
ANC Acid Neutralising Capacity
ASS Acid sulfate soil
ASSMP Acid Sulfate Soils Management Plan
BPMG Best Practice Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Coastal Acid Sulfate Soils
CASS Coastal acid sulfate soils
CRS Chromium Reducible Sulfur
EES Environment Effects Statement
EOLSS End of line scraper station
HDD Horizontal directional drilling
IWRG Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines
KP Kilometre point
mbgl Metres below ground level
mg/L Milligrams per litre
ML Megalitre
NA Net Acidity
PASS Potential Acid Sulfate Soils
PIG Pipeline Inspection Gauge
pHf Field pH
pHfox Field peroxide pH
ROW Right of way
RPD Relative Percent Difference
SEPP State Environment Protection Policy
SPOCAS Suspension Peroxide Oxidation – Combined Acidity and Sulfate
TAA Titratable Actual Acidity
TDS Total dissolved solids
VTS Victorian Transmission System
AECOM
Glossary of terms
Term Definition
%S A measure of reduced inorganic sulfur (using the SCR or SPOCAS methods) expressed as a percentage of the weight of dry soil analysed.
Acid Neutralising Capacity (ANC)
A measure of the ability of the ASS material to neutralise acidity.
Acid sulfate soil (ASS) Acid sulfate soils are naturally occurring soils, sediments or organic substrates that are formed under waterlogged conditions. These soils contain iron sulphide minerals or their oxidation products. When exposed, these soils oxidise and they can generate acidic water (if in contact with rainfall or other water source).
Action Criteria The measured level of potential plus existing acidity beyond which management action is required, if a soil or sediment is to be disturbed. The trigger levels vary for texture categories and the amount of disturbance. The extent of management required will vary with the level of acidity and the volume of the disturbance, among other factors.
Actual acid sulfate soil (AASS) Soils containing highly acidic soil horizons resulting from the oxidation of soil materials are rich in reduced inorganic sulfur primarily pyrite. When this oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur produces acidity in excess of the soil material’s capacity to neutralise this acidity, the soil material will often acidify to a pH 4 or less, forming an Actual Acid Sulfate Soil (AASS). The recognition of AASS materials can be confirmed by the presence of jarosite in these materials, or the location of other AASS or Potential ASS (PASS) materials within or in the nearby vicinity to the sampling location.
Actual Acidity The soluble and exchangeable acidity already present in the soil, often as a consequence of previous oxidation of reduced inorganic sulfur. It is this acidity that will be most mobilised and discharged following a rainfall event. It is measured in the laboratory using the Titratable Actual Acidity (TAA) method. It does not aim to include the less soluble acidity (that is Retained Acidity) held in hydroxy-sulfate minerals such as jarosite.
Alignment The centreline of the ROW selected for assessment in the EES.
Bell hole Awidened area of trench, which enables horizontal boring to be undertaken.
Construction right of way (ROW) Corridor generally of 30m width.
Environment Effects Statement An Environment Effects Statement provides a comprehensive framework for the assessment of the potential environmental impacts or effects of a proposed development under the Environment Effects Act 1978.
End of Line Scraper Station An underground delivery facility situated at the connection point to the Longford Dandenong Pipeline east of Pakenham and used to launch and receive pipeline inspection gauges (PIGs) into and from the pipeline system.
AECOM
Term Definition
Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD)
A ‘trenchless technology’ by which a pipeline tunnel is drilled at a shallow angle under a crossing (e.g. a waterway, wetland, road or railway) through which the pipe is then threaded.
KPs Reference points alongside the proposed pipeline alignment, calculated according to the distance in kilometres from the Crib Point Receiving Facility.
Liming rate Liming rate is defined as the dose of neutralising agent needed to neutralise the calculated net acidity for a select sample.
Net acidity The measure of the acidity hazard of ASS materials. Determined from laboratory analysis, it is the result obtained when the values for various components of soil acidity and acid neutralising capacity (but only after corroboration of the ANC’s effectiveness) are substituted into the Acid Base Accounting equation.
pHFOX pH measurement based on peroxide test results in the field.
Potential ASS (PASS) Soils that contain appreciable amounts of reduced inorganic sulfur that have not oxidised but will acidify to a pH of less than 4.0 after oxidation. The soils are also known as hypersulfidic soil materials. The field pH of these soils in their undisturbed state is pH 4 or more, and may be neutral or slightly alkaline. Potential ASS pose an environmental hazard if disturbed, as they can generate considerable acidity if mismanaged.
Total dissolved solids The total amount of mobile charged ions, including minerals, salts or metals dissolved in a given volume of water.
Trenching Excavation of a trench for burial of a pipeline.
Trench water Water (usually shallow groundwater, rainwater or runoff) in the pipeline trench.
1 AECOM
4. Introduction
This Acid Sulfate Soils (ASS) Management Protocol has been developed to specifically address the occurrence of acid sulfate soils (ASS) associated with the Gas Import Jetty and Pipeline Project Pipeline Works (the ‘Project’). The Gas Import Jetty and Pipeline Project comprises two sets of works: the Gas Import Jetty Works and the Pipeline Works and this ASS Management Protocol is applicable to the Pipeline Works only. This document forms part of the Pipeline Works Environmental Management Plan (EMP).
The ASS Management Protocol is based on soil investigations undertaken as part of the Environment Effects Statement (EES) for the Project and includes mitigation measures listed in the EES Technical Report E: Contamination and acid sulfate soils. The procedures contained within this ASS Management Protocol should be updated and revised to address site conditions that vary from those indicated by investigations, or where alternative construction methodologies are adopted.
4.1 What are Acid Sulfate Soils?
The EPA Victoria Industrial Waste Management Policy (Waste Acid Sulfate Soils) 1999 defines ‘acid sulfate soil’ as:
‘… any soil, sediment, unconsolidated geological material or disturbed consolidated rock mass containing metal sulphides, which exceeds criteria for acid sulfate soils specified in EPA Victoria Publication 655 entitled Acid Sulfate Soil and Rock published by the Authority in 1999 and amended from time to time or republished by the Authority’.
ASS are soils affected by iron sulphide minerals. ASS can occur naturally in coastal environments such as estuarine systems, mangrove swamps, back swamps and in inland environments such as river and stream channels, lakes, wetlands, billabongs, floodplains and marshes (Fitzpatrick, R. and Shand, P., 2008).
Generally, ASS is classified into two broad types:
5. Potential Acid Sulfate Soils (PASS) – soil that contains un-oxidised metal sulfides. This only exists under oxygen-free or waterlogged conditions. If disturbed, it can produce acid.
6. Actual Acid Sulfate Soils (AASS) – soil that has been exposed to oxygen and water and is already acidic.
Presence of AASS or PASS in sufficient amounts can have a lasting effect on the soil characteristics, causing deoxygenation or release contaminants when the iron sulfide minerals are exposed to oxygen (Fitzpatrick, R. and Shand, P., 2008). They become a potential constraint to construction activities, requiring the implementation of controls to manage the spoil during excavation, trenching and drilling activities.
6.1 Background and Purpose of ASS Management Protocol
Soil sampling program undertaken as part of the EES Technical Report E: Contamination and acid sulfate soils between 29 November 2018 and 26 April 2019 identified the presence of ASS throughout the Project area for the Pipeline Works. Therefore, any soil disturbance activities such as excavation, trenching and thrust boring would have the potential to encounter ASS and oxidise PASS, and as such an appropriate level of treatment and management is required during the construction and/or maintenance works.
The open trench sections for the Pipeline Works would disturb approximately 91,500 cubic metres of soil (in-situ). Based on the volume of soil disturbance, the Pipeline Works is classified as a ‘High Hazard’ under the CASS BPMG (2010) and may only proceed with an approved environmental management plan. EPA Victoria was consulted on 19 August 2019, and it was agreed that the Pipeline Works would not require an EPA Victoria approved ASS Management Plan. Instead, an ASS Management Protocol will be developed and included in the Pipeline Works EMP which will be approved in accordance with Pipeline Act 2005, in consultation with EPA Victoria.
2 AECOM
The main purpose of this ASS Management Protocol is to mitigate or control potential impacts relating to the disturbance of ASS associated with the proposed earthworks and construction of the Project.
The term PASS and AASS are referred to as ASS within this ASS Management Protocol, unless there is a specific need for differentiation.
6.2 Legislative Context and Guidelines
This ASS Management Protocol has been prepared to address the requirement of the Industrial Waste Management Policy (Waste Acid Sulfate Soils), Special Gazette S125, published on 18 August 1999 which states that management of waste ASS must be in accordance with the current best practice or any best practice environment management guidelines approved by the Authority.
The ASS Management Protocol was prepared with consideration of the following legislation and guidelines:
1. EPA Victoria Publication IWRG655.1: Acid Sulfate Soil and Rock (July 2009)
2. Victorian Best Practice Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Coastal Acid Sulfate Soil (CASS BPMG, 2010).
4. National Acid Sulfate Soil Sampling and Identification Methods Manual, 2018
5. National Acid Sulfate Soil Identification and Laboratory Methods Manual, 2018
6. Australian Standards 4969.
7. Site overview
The information contained within this section has been extracted from the EES Technical Report E: Contamination and acid sulfate soils, EES Technical Report D: Groundwater, EES Technical Report C: Surface water and various information sources referenced within that document.
7.1 Site Description
A description of the Project area is provided in the Pipeline Works EMP.
7.2 Topography and surface water
The Project is located within the Western Port catchment and a large portion of Western Port is listed as a Ramsar Site of international significance, supporting a diversity of plants, animals and ecosystems, including several unique and threatened species, four marine national parks, large tracts of mangroves and seagrasses (Sharp et al., 2013).
The Western Port catchment varies from the hilly regions near the Bunyip State Park and Strzelecki Ranges to the low lying, flat to undulating terrain of the former Koo Wee Rup swamp with surface water draining from these topographic highs to Western Port.
The Project area includes coastal floodplains in the lower reaches of the catchment where the relief is mostly low lying and generally flat to gently undulating. The ground surface elevation ranges from approximately one to two metres above sea level in the southern portion to 10 – 25 metres above sea level over the northern portion, where the gently sloping topography grades up to the north.
A large portion of the Western Port catchment where the Pipeline Works will be located has been substantially cleared of native vegetation and is now predominantly used for farming. The pipeline will traverse coastal floodplains adjoining Western Port. The local hydrology of part of the catchment was substantially altered in the 1800s when creeks were modified to drain the Koo Wee Rup Swamp. Large open drains were excavated, and creeks increased in size to drain the swamp.
3 AECOM
The pipeline alignment is contained within the Western Port catchment which includes a number of significant waterways that discharge to Western Port. Assessment undertaken as part of the EES Technical Report C: Surface water indicates that the proposed pipeline alignment crosses 64 waterways, swales and surface drains. The location of each waterway crossing is indicated on pipeline alignment plans provided in Appendix B of the EES Technical Report C: Surface water.
Desktop review of water quality monitoring for waterways crossed by the pipeline alignment, where water quality data is available indicates that that waterways in the catchment for the Pipeline Works, including more substantial waterways such as Cardinia Creek, are in poor condition and under considerable stress, while other waterways in the lower catchment are under severe stress.
Refer to the of the EES Technical Report C: Surface water for further information.
7.3 Regional geology and hydrogeology
The Project is located within Western Port Basin, which is a relatively shallow, structurally controlled sedimentary basin consisting of sediments and volcanic flows. The western side of the Basin coincides with the Clyde Monocline-Tyabb Fault System, and the eastern extent is controlled by the Heath Hill Fault. Basin sediments pinch out to the north against uplifted basement (SRW, 2010), and extend offshore to the south.
The sediments and volcanic flows of the basin form a multilayered aquifer system, which is dominated by a Tertiary Age sedimentary sequence that thickens to approximately 200 meters in the Koo Wee Rup area, and pinches out along Basin margins.
The Tertiary Age sediments are overlain by a relatively thin veneer of Quaternary sediments, including coastal and inland dune deposits, swamp and lake deposits and alluvial deposits; although these sediments thicken to between 10 and 50 meters in the Koo Wee Rup area.
A generalised description of the local geology encountered during site investigations is provided in Table 6 and the outcropping units in the study area are shown in Figure A1, Appendix A. The geology encountered was consistent with the Geological Survey of Victoria Queenscliffe SJ 55-9 1:250,000 map (VandenBerg, A.H.M., 1997).
Table 6 Generalised local geology
Approximate Depth (mbgl)
Lithology / Formation General Lithology Encountered
0.0 – 0.2 FILL and/or Sandy CLAY Brown, FILL – minor reworked soils
0.0 – 1.0 Northern half: alluvial sediments, swamp lake deposit Southern half: primarily Brighton Group
Clayey SAND to CLAY, brown becoming grey, high to low plasticity
0.1 – 2.5 Sandy CLAY to CLAY; brown to grey, high to low plasticity
Regional groundwater flow is generally from the Basin margins towards Western Port. The presence of shallow aquitards, surface water features and groundwater extraction locally affect depths to groundwater. The groundwater table across the Basin will generally be a subdued version of topography, with the depth to groundwater increasing beneath topographical highs and shallow groundwater in the lower reaches of the Basin.
There is no long-term groundwater level data available and therefore the seasonal water level fluctuations are unknown. However, it is typical in shallow aquifers to have seasonal fluctuations of 0.5 to 2 meters. Water levels tend to be shallowest in late winter and spring, and deepest in late summer. Longer term fluctuations also occur due to changes in climate e.g. drought periods.
A total of 26 groundwater wells were installed as part of EES site investigations. Drilling and installation of groundwater monitoring wells were completed between 3 December 2018 and 11 January 2019, and the subsequent gauging, sampling, and laboratory analysis was completed between 23 January 2019 and 30 January 2019.
4 AECOM
Groundwater levels, field sampling parameters and groundwater quality laboratory analytical results are provided in Table B1 – B3, Appendix B.
Refer to the EES Technical Report E: Contamination and acid sulfate soils and Technical Report D: Groundwater for further information.
8. CASS occurrence
Soil sampling program undertaken as part of the EES Technical Report E: Contamination and acid sulfate soils between 29 November 2018 and 26 April 2019 identified the presence of ASS throughout the Project area for the Pipeline Works. Net acidity exceeding the ‘Action Criteria’ of 0.03%S for disturbance exceeding 1,000 tonnes (BPMG, 2010) was exceeded in 72 soil samples of total 172 samples, with net acidity ranging between 0.02%S and 0.18%S and calculated liming rates to neutralise the calculated net acidity ranging between 1 kg CaCO3/tonne and 8 kg CaCO3/tonne. PASS was identified at the following sampling locations between KP17.8 and KP36:
1. KP17.8 – MW09 at depth of 3.0 metres below ground level (mbgl)
2. KP19.3 – MW10 at depth of 3.0 mbgl
3. KP32.5 – BH207 at depth of 0.5 mbgl
4. KP32.8 – BH209 at depth of 0.5 mbgl1
5. KP36 – BH34 at depth of 2.0 mbgl1
It is noted that sample point frequency does not comply with the recommendation made in Table 1 of Victorian EPA publication IWRG655.1: Acid Sulfate Soil and Rock which specifies sampling at 100 metre intervals for a pipeline, except at the ASS targeted sampling locations (defined in the ASRIS as an area with high probability of occurrence of ASS, shown in Figure A2, Appendix A). However, the distribution of ASS throughout the Project area would suggest that this is not required, other than to calculate or refine liming rates, and that all soils be managed as ASS (AASS or PASS) in accordance with Victorian Best Practice Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Coastal Acid Sulfate Soils (CASS BPMG) (2010).
The ASS samples locations, net acidity and liming rate for each sample are shown in Figure A3, Appendix A. Tabulated results are provided in Table B4, Appendix B.
9. Project description
The Project description including the construction methodology, operation and maintenance is provided in the Pipeline Works EMP.
10. CASS management strategy
The soil assessment undertaken identified that all soils should be managed to mitigate acidic or PASS. The strategy outlined below is based on the proposed construction methodology.
Clearing of vegetation and topsoil (approximately 100 millimetres in thickness) within the construction right of way (ROW) is required to provide a safe and efficient area for construction activities. This activity may occur up to several months before the trench excavation, whereas the remainder of the trench (“Trench Spoil”) is proposed to be excavated and backfilled within the duration specified in Section 10.2(c)(i). Due to the different timeframe / methodologies and risk profile, separate management strategies are proposed for the topsoil and the trench spoil.
1 Conservatively classified as PASS. Samples were analysed using the SPOCAS method for QA/QC data
validation purposes.
5 AECOM
10.1 Topsoil
The field investigation indicated that the surface soils (between 0.0 and 0.2 mbgl) within the Project area contain existing acidity, with pH (CaCl2) ranging between 4.1 and 7.6 pH units and approximately 60 per cent of topsoil samples were below pH 5.0 (from 60 soil samples). It is not possible based on available data to identify whether the soils are simply acidic or are AASS. Laboratory derived data for the sub-soils indicate the presence of existing acidic soils, where acidity is potentially from sources other than inorganic sulfides.
Note that the CASS BPMG (2010) is silent on the management of topsoil under these conditions and therefore we have referred to information presented in the National Acid Sulfate Soils Guidance (Sullivan et al, 2018), regarding naturally acidic topsoil.
Naturally occurring acidic soils are not considered an environmental hazard and indeed are usually part of acidophilic ecosystems, whose health depends on maintaining an acidic environment. Liming of naturally acidic ecosystems could lead to unnaturally alkaline environments resulting in severe ecological damage to the acidophilic organisms that relied on the acidic nature of these ecosystems (Sullivan et al, 2018). As a result, the potential soil acidity risks associated with the topsoil stockpile should be managed by regular monitoring (for pH) of surface water runoff following rainfall, adjacent to water courses and sensitive receptors. Runoff from the topsoil stockpile should be managed in accordance with the mitigation measures for surface water specified in the Pipeline Works EMP; and neutralisation (based on liming rates given in Section 5.2.4) should be undertaken if acceptable pH levels are exceeded. Alternatively, the topsoil can be sampled in accordance with CASS BPMG (2010) and the risk reassessed.
10.2 Trench spoil
The following are ASS management strategies numbered in order of priority, as prescribed by the CASS BPMG (2010). 1. Avoid disturbance.
2. Minimise disturbance – Excavate the smallest quantity of soil possible, avoid dewatering where possible or reduce extent and timeframe of dewatering, creation of small stockpiles etc.
3. Prevent oxidation – Stage Project activities to reduce stockpile duration, consider covering stockpiles with high density polyethylene (HDPE) if extended exposure required.
4. Treat to reduce or neutralise acidity –Treat stockpiles with lime or use guard layers in conjunction with prevention techniques. Treatment may not be required depending on minimisation and prevention approaches adopted.
5. Offsite reuse or disposal - Dispose offsite at an EPA Victoria approved facility.
The preferred management option for the trench spoil during the pipeline construction is to prevent oxidation of ASS and minimise exposure upon excavation.
(a) Avoid disturbance
The desirable management approach to deal with ASS soils is to avoid disturbance wherever possible. However, there is limited opportunity to do this as the Project is bound by engineering and spatial constraints.
(b) Minimise disturbance
Where disturbance of ASS is unavoidable, The Project will minimise the amount of ASS disturbance by preparing a detailed soil excavation staging strategy that include:
1. Staging of disturbance such that the potential effects on soils disturbed at any one time can be effectively managed.
2. Staging of disturbance to avoid activities that result in large scale or long-term fluctuation in groundwater levels. Careful planning of disturbance to minimise the extent or length of time groundwater table is raised or lowered.
6 AECOM
(c) Prevent oxidation
(i) Stage Projects
In addition to minimising the amount of ASS disturbance, the Project will minimise the duration of exposure of disturbed sub soil material in order to prevent generation and transport of acid. Staging the excavation program to minimise the amount of time that ASS is exposed to the atmosphere (including rainfall and seeping perched waters (if any)).
The soil excavation staging strategy (described in Section (b)) will include the time period over which soils may be temporarily stockpiled, as recommended by the CASS BPMG (2010), presented in Table
7.
Table 7 Suggested short-term stockpiling durations based on soil texture (after Dear et al., 2002)
Type of material
(McDonald et al., 1990)
Approx. clay content % Duration of stockpile
Coarse (sands to loamy sands) ≤ 5 Overnight (18 hours)
Medium (sandy loams to light clays) 5–40 2.5 days (70 hours)
Fine (medium to heavy clays and silty clays. ≥ 40 5 days (140 hours)
Some control measures during temporary stockpiling include:
1. Construction works during wet weather should be avoided unless conditions are such that surface water issues can be managed e.g. covering the stockpile and directing runoff that has the potential to be impacted by the stockpile material into the open trench (where practicable).
2. Soil stockpiles will be established such that it does not exceed two metres in height and safe batter slopes are maintained at all times.
(d) Treat to reduce or neutralise acidity
If soils are to be stockpiled longer than the recommended time period for short-term stockpiling durations (as described in Section (c)(i)), then the excavated spoil will be neutralised using a liming agent and verified prior to reuse (if needed).
Neutralisation of ASS involves mixing of finely crushed (predominantly <0.5 millimetres) Agricultural
lime (aglime) or other liming agents to the excavated material to ensure the potential of ASS to
generate acid is minimised or prevented.
Excavated soil (requiring treatment) could be neutralised using one or more of the following methods depending on various factors such as weather, the staging of excavations and soil physicochemical conditions (e.g. moisture and texture):
1. Mixed concurrently as soil material is added directly into haul trucks prior to transporting to a designated temporary storage, thus achieving a degree of mixing during transport and placement.
2. Mixed in-situ as part of the removal process (e.g. soils will be limed prior to excavation, transport and subsequent placement, thus achieving a degree of mixing during transport and final placement).
3. Mixed ex-situ on a temporary treatment pad within a designated treatment area (i.e. excavated, placed on treatment pad and neutralised).
(i) Treatment Area
The soil excavation staging strategy (described in Section (b)) would minimise the volume of ASS generated at a time during the construction of the pipeline. As such a designated treatment area and pad may not be needed. However, in case, of larger volumes (e.g. greater 250 cubic metres), a temporary ASS treatment area will need to be established prior to commencing excavation works.
7 AECOM
The treatment area will be sized and constructed to ensure there is sufficient area to accommodate the treatment pad footprint, stockpiles of treated material and soils requiring treatment, while being able to efficiently accommodate the machinery and associated support equipment.
The location of the temporary treatment area will consider the available space within the 30-metre-wide pipeline construction ROW, staging of excavations and broader construction timing, and health and safety requirements. Neutralisation of ASS will be conducted on a temporary treatment pad (if required) within the designated treatment area.
(ii) Temporary Treatment Pad
The treatment pad (if required) will collect and isolate the leachate from the surrounding environment. The treatment pad will be appropriately designed to isolate and contain potential leachates generated from the surrounding environment, consisting of:
0. A low permeability base (below a guard layer of aglime) such as compacted clayey soil material (greater than 0.1 metre thick), a concrete slab, layer of bitumen or HDPE sheeting to reduce the infiltration of leachate to the soil and groundwater. The base layer will be slightly sloped to prevent leachate from pooling within the treatment pad area.
0. A guard layer of aglime will be spread onto the base layer of the treatment pad, before the placement of soils, at a rate of 5 kilograms fine aglime per square metre per vertical metre of sediment. This will reduce the risk by neutralising acidic leachate generated in the treatment stockpile that are not neutralised during the treatment process. Since the guard layer is likely to be removed with the treated soil, the guard layer will be reapplied as necessary.
1. Appropriate leachate collection system and containment bund will be used to contain stormwater runoff and leachates. Stormwater run-on will be diverted away from the treatment pad using sandbags, shallow diversion/catch drains or similar (if required).
2. Leachates and runoff collected and contained within the treatment pad area will be appropriately treated (if required) prior to discharge
(iii) Soil Neutralisation Procedure
The following soil neutralisation procedure should be used:
1. ASS materials identified will always be kept separate from other soils such as topsoil (wherever possible) to reduce the volume of material requiring neutralisation/treatment.
2. Neutralisation will be carried out as soon as practically possible and will be conducted by mechanical means (e.g. mechanical tilling or bucket blending methods) to achieve uniform blending, as far as practical, of the ASS with liming agents.
3. All necessary Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and controls will be used to ensure adequate measures, associated with lime neutralising activities, are implemented to minimise dust emissions, inhalation and direct contact with fine aglime. As a minimum, safety glasses to protect the eyes, nitrile gloves (when required) and long sleeve pants and shirt to reduce direct skin contact, and an approved face mask to prevent inhalation of dust (minimum AS/NZS 1716 Class P2 face mask for casual exposure).
4. Soil stockpiles will be established such that it does not exceed two metres in height and safe batter slopes are maintained at all times. If wet weather is forecasted, un-neutralised stockpiles should be covered and should have means to collect runoff water before releasing in the environment.
5. ASS will be fully treated or neutralised with fine aglime prior to reuse onsite within the Project boundary.
6. Neutralisation will also be used as a contingency plan to address actions to be undertaken where the management and mitigation framework in this document are not met, such as if soils are to be stockpiled longer than the recommended time period for short-term stockpiling durations (as described in Section (c)(i)) or additional ASS are identified on site that are inconsistent with existing sampling, additional sampling for laboratory characterisation and subsequent appropriate liming should be considered (Sections 8 and (iv)).
8 AECOM
(iv) Liming Rate
Sufficient aglime is required to ensure all existing acidity that may be present and potential acidity that could be generated from complete oxidation of the sulfides over time is neutralised. The calculated liming rate for each sample, completed as part of the EES Technical Report E: Contamination and acid sulfate soils, are shown in Figure A3, Appendix A and tabulated in Table B4, Appendix B. Table 8 shows the preliminary nominal liming rates required for soil material excavated from the site. Liming rates have been determined using the highest net acidity. Liming rates are relevant to the respective soil type and depth encountered during the investigation. Any unexpected soils identified not consistent with the existing sampling, additional sampling for laboratory characterisation and subsequent appropriate liming is to be considered.
*Note: Based on minimum safety factor of 1.5. It needs to be recalculated in the field based on wet bulk density and neutralising value of the aglime
mbgl: meters below ground level
Soil type description logged to the Australian Standard AS 1726 Geotechnical Site Investigations
11 AECOM
As noted in Section 8, the sample point frequency does not comply with the recommendation made in Table 1 of Victorian EPA publication IWRG655.1: Acid Sulfate Soil and Rock which specifies sampling at 100 metre intervals for a pipeline, except at the ASS targeted sampling locations (defined in the ASRIS as an area with high probability of occurrence of ASS, shown in Figure A2, Appendix A). However, the distribution of ASS throughout the Project area would suggest that this is not required, other than to calculate or refine liming rates, and that all soils be managed as AASS or PASS in accordance with CASS BPMG (2010).
If unknown material (such as grey moist clays or material with yellow mottling are identified), further testing of in-situ soil material or stockpile may be carried out during bulk excavation. In the case of additional sampling, the required aglime application rate will be calculated using the following:
1. NV = neutralising value of the aglime being used and represents the purity or per cent of CaCO3 in the limestone. Unless otherwise known, an initial NV value of 93% will be used considering that agricultural limestone usually contains impurities.
2. Wet bulk density = 1.7 t/m3 if the soil bulk density is unknown.
3. SF = safety factor (= 1.5) because aglime has a low solubility and hence a low reactivity, and in most situations will not be fully mixed with the soil regardless of the method used. (Dear et al, 2014)
(v) Verification Testing and Monitoring
The neutralisation of ASS material needs to be verified before re-use. For all the neutralised material, verification samples will be collected from each treated lot. The samples collected over the full thickness of the treated lot, will be formed by compositing materials from three randomly selected locations across the lot/stockpile. Soil sampling for verification (and assessment) purpose will be conducted in accordance with Dear et al. (2014) as soon as practically possible within 42 hours (i.e. 2 nights). Large gravels (greater than 2 millimetres), fragments of wood, charcoal and stones need to be noted before being removed from the samples in the field.
Samples will be collected in laboratory supplied ASS bags, stored on ice in a cool box and submitted to a laboratory on the day of collection (with chain of custody (COC) documentation) that is accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA) for ASS analysis. The Chromium reducible sulfur (CRS) suite will be conducted on each sample to confirm net acidity by Acid Base Accounting.
As per Dear et al 2014, the following performance criteria must all be met for soil that has been treated using neutralisation:
1. The neutralising capacity of the treated soil must exceed the existing plus potential acidity of the soil by at least a safety factor of 1.5.
2. Post-neutralisation, the soil pH (pHKCl) is to be greater than 6.5
3. No single sample shall exceed a net acidity of 0.03 %S.
Excess neutralising agent should stay within the treated soil until all acid generation reactions are complete and the soil has no further capacity to generate acidity.
(vi) Characterisation of Suspected Acid Sulfate Soils
Neutralisation will also be used as a contingency plan to address excavated soils that are not
representative of the soil testing (see Section 8). That is, if the below indicators of ASS are identified at
the site, neutralisation should be undertaken. Indicators include:
1. Dark coloured wet soft clays (refer to Plate 1)
2. Jarosite (yellow staining) or other aluminium sulfate minerals become apparent (refer to Plate
1)
3. Iron hydroxide (reddish staining) becomes apparent
12 AECOM
4. Hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg) smell
5. Additional sampling and analysis indicate concentrations of reduced inorganic sulfur is greater than 0.03%.
Plate 1 Dark clays (left) and yellow mottling (right) indicating presence of acid sulfate soils
Where suspected ASS is encountered, this material must be excavated separately and segregated from non-ASS materials. An experienced ASS practitioner swil attend site to provide additional guidance on suspected ASS on as required basis. Where suspected ASS is encountered a field test (pHF and pHFOX) will be conducted to provide an initial assessment of the materials. Field screening tests (described in Appendix C) will be conducted at a minimum rate of one per 250 m3 of suspected ASS material encountered. Confirmatory tests will comprise sample analysis for the CRS Suite of tests. Materials returning net acidity less than 0.03%S will be removed from the stockpile area and used as fill without further acid sulfate management. Where net acidity greater than 0.03%S (with reduced inorganic sulfur greater than 0.03%) is found, the materials will be treated using aglime as described in Section (iii).
(e) Offsite reuse or disposal
There is a possibility that the excavated material is considered to be unsuitable for reuse on-site from a geotechnical and contamination perspective. As such, any excess acidic spoil material of this nature would be transferred off-site to a nominated landfill with a licence to accept such material.
Potential controls during transfer of acidic spoil material from site include:
1. Implementation of a materials handling and tracking procedure.
2. Transfer of material to the facility within the time period over which soils may be temporarily stockpiled as recommended by the CASS BPMG (2010) (refer to Section (c)), keeping the stockpiles covered to avoid runoff.
3. Transfer of soil in covered trucks.
(f) Water management
No active dewatering of groundwater is being proposed as part of construction activities. However, field investigation undertaken as part of the EES impact assessment indicated that trenching may encountered groundwater in some sections of the pipeline alignment. To ensure that pipeline construction meets applicable standards, the trench may need to be dewatered to remove any water which has collected during the time it has been open. The Pipeline Works will discharge non-contaminated acidic and/or brackish groundwater/trench water from the open trenches and bell holes to adjacent land (with permission/approval from relevant landholder (where appropriate). Dewatering activities will be managed in accordance with SEPP (Waters) and the Pipeline Works EMP.
The following are management measures for the trench water:
13 AECOM
1. Dewatering activities will adopt the management and mitigation practices outlined in the “National Acid Sulfate Soils Guidance: Guidance for the dewatering of acid sulfate soil in shallow groundwater environments”
2. Runoff that has the potential to be impacted by stockpile material should be directed into the open trench (where practicable).
3. Minimise activation of PASS by minimising duration (less than seven days) and extent of dewatering activities, such as dewatering immediately prior to installation of pipe and minimise the time that trench sections and bell holes are open.
4. Water collected from within excavated trenches should be collected and treated if turbidity exceeds EPA requirements prior to discharging. Refer to the relevant section in the Pipeline Works EMP.
5. Water should be tested for pH and salinity prior to discharge to land. pH should be between 4 and 9, and salinity should not exceed 6,000µS/cm.
6. Discharge of water to land should avoid soil erosion or sedimentation of land or water. Sediment control devices to remove suspended solids and dissipate flow should be used where required.
7. Water should not be discharged to waterways or into stormwater drains without approval from relevant authorities.
8. Water that cannot be treated to meet the relevant discharge criteria should be disposed to an EPA Victoria licensed facility.
9. Relevant landholder(s) and water authorities should be consulted, and permission obtained prior to discharge to land.
10. Discharge to land should not occur within 50 metres of watercourses.
11. Discharge should be to low gradient, stable, grassed areas and be undertaken in accordance with landholder requirements and through “irrigation type” systems to prevent scour or erosion. Visual monitoring during land discharge should be undertaken to ensure water does not enter existing waterways.
12. Contaminated water should be managed in accordance with mitigation measures described in the Pipeline Works EMP. The following are areas where contaminated groundwater has been identified and discharge to land must not occur:
1.1 Between KP14.0 and KP14.3, adjacent to the former Tyabb landfill.
1.2 Between KP7.3 and KP7.9. An intrusive groundwater investigation must be undertaken in the area prior to commencing pipeline construction, to confirm presence or absence of contaminated groundwater within the area, due to historical and existing land uses.
13. Where dewatering is required for horizontal thrust bore bell holes where acid sulfate soils are present and groundwater is intersected, the requirements of Dewatering Management Level 1 of the national guidelines will be implemented, including:
Installation of a groundwater monitoring well at approximately 10 metres from the thrust bore bell
hole and dewatering is required during construction.
Water table level monitoring daily during the dewatering operation and compare against the
estimated drawdown and/or radial extent of the groundwater cone of depression to ensure
that the actual drawdown and/or radial extent of the groundwater cone of depression is not
more than that predicted from calculations.
Measurement of the groundwater pH every day in the groundwater monitoring well and the
excavation inflow during the dewatering operation to assess for groundwater acidification.
Cessation of dewatering and undertake risk assessment to determine appropriate remediation
option(s) if the results of groundwater and/or dewatering effluent monitoring indicate
deterioration in groundwater quality e.g. groundwater pH is less than 5.5 pH units,
14 AECOM
If the duration of dewatering exceeds 7 days and the radial extent of the groundwater cone of
depression is greater than 50 metres, the requirements of Dewatering Management Level 2
will be implemented in line with the national guidelines.
(i) Treatment of Acidic waters
As acidic leachate or groundwater seepage into trenches normally contains or may contain many ions capable of producing acidity by hydrolysis (e.g. Fe3+, Al3+), a water sample should be taken for laboratory analyses (for measurement of titratable acidity) to more accurately determine lime requirements.
If laboratory analysis is constraint by time due to the adopted ASS management strategy (refer to Sections (b) and (c)), and no other means of estimating the amount of neutralising agent is available, the amount required to neutralise the trench water can be calculated by firstly measuring the current pH of the excavation pit water with a recently calibrated pH meter. The desired pH is usually between 6.5 and 8.5 (pH 7 is normally targeted).
The rate of application of neutralising agent will vary with the solubility, the fineness of the neutralising agent, the application technique and the pH of the water. Table 92 provides a general guide, for minimum quantities of pure aglime, hydrated lime and sodium bicarbonate needed to treat impounded water of 1 megalitre (1,000 cubic metres) capacity.
Table 9 General guide to neutralise 1ML of acidic leachate
Current Water pH Aglime (kg pure CaCO2) Hydrated Lime ((kg pure
CaOH)
Sodium Bicarbonate (kg pure
NaHCO2)
0.5 15,824 11,716 26,563
1.0 5,004 3,705 8,390
1.5 1,600 1,185 2,686
2.0 500 370 839
2.5 160 118 269
3.0 50 37 84
3.5 16 12 27
4.0 5 4 8.4
4.5 1.6 1.18 2.69
5.0 0.5 0.37 0.84
5.5 0.16 0.12 0.27
6.0 0.05 0.037 0.08
6.5 0.016 0.012 0.027
Notes:
1. The calculations in this table assume low saline water acidified by hydrogen ions (H+) and does not take
into account the considerable buffering capacity or acid producing reactions of some acid salts and
soluble species of aluminium and iron.
2. To more accurately calculate the amount of commercial product required, the weight of neutralising
agent from the table should be multiplied by a purity factor (100/ Neutralising Value for aglime) or (148/
Neutralising Value for hydrated lime).
2 Table 5, section 10.15, Planning and Managing Development involving Acid Sulfate Soils, Department
of Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland Government, 2002
15 AECOM
3. If neutralising substantial quantities of ASS leachate, full laboratory analysis of the water will be
necessary to adequately estimate the amount of neutralising material required.
4. Hydrated lime is more soluble than aglime and hence more suited to water treatment. However, it has a
higher pH; as such, incremental addition and thorough mixing is needed to prevent overshooting the
desired pH. The water pH should be checked regularly after thorough mixing and allowing sufficient time
for equilibration before further addition of neutralising product.
(ii) Training requirements for construction personnel
The requirements of this document will be communicated through toolbox talks and pre-start meetings, with the information relevant to the day’s activities being re-iterated to ensure that ASS is managed in accordance with this ASS Management Protocol.
Specifically, all relevant site-based personnel must be trained on the requirements of the ASS management procedure including the recommended time period over which soils may be temporarily stockpiled before treatment commences as recommended by the CASS BPMG (2010) (refer to Section (c)).
If unexpected ASS is encountered a detailed ASS assessment must be undertaken by an appropriately qualified and experienced practitioner in line with the requirements of the CASS BPMG (2010). A suitably qualified person is a professionally accredited soil scientist or a person with five or more years recognised experience in ASS assessment and management.
ASS field indicators are provided Appendix D.
(g) Contingency plan
Adaptive management methods will be used to address actions to be undertaken where the management and mitigation measures in this document are not met. Contingency actions for the management of ASS during the construction phase include:
In the event that the duration of the earthworks is extended (due to unforeseen circumstances), a reassessment of the risk and management strategies must be undertaken, updated and implemented (if required).
Appropriate steps must be taken to minimise infiltration of water into the stockpiles as far as practically possible (e.g. staging the works so that manageable amounts of spoil are generated at one point, covering with durable plastic sheeting) prior to expected and during unforeseen rainfall events.
In the event of emergency situation (e.g. unforeseen severe weather) or the material cannot be fully treated within the recommended short-term stockpiling durations (refer to Section (c)), fine aglime at a rate of 5 kilograms fine aglime per square metre per vertical metre of stockpile will be spread over the surface of excavated ASS. This will reduce risk and limit/control the generation of acidity in the first instance as a contingency measure.
Appropriate steps should be taken to minimise infiltration of water into any temporary ASS stockpiles or the ASS loads in the trucks as far as practical possible (e.g. use of durable plastic sheeting) prior to expected and during unforeseen rainfall events, minimising water spraying). The plastic sheeting will be suitably anchored to the ground surface.
If any soils are encountered during excavation works that are not representative of the soils previously identified, laboratory tests in accordance with the CASS BPMG (2010) and the National ASS guidance (2018) will be completed to identify ASS horizons and evaluate the amount of existing and potential acidity.
For onsite treated ASS (if undertaken), if verification testing of aglime treated ASS indicate the performance criteria has not been met, the material will remain within the treatment area and be re-treated with sufficient aglime to achieve the performance criteria (refer to Section 7.0 prior to reuse.
16 AECOM
11. Monitoring program
During the construction at Pipeline Works, the following monitoring regime shall be undertaken with respect to ASS. Monitoring will be carried out by an appropriately qualified person, using calibrated equipment on samples that are representative of the discharge or background.
(a) Trench water
14. Water should be tested for pH and salinity prior to discharge to land. pH should be between 4 and 9, and salinity should not exceed 6,000 µS/cm.
15. Waters not meeting required performance indicators (refer to the Pipeline Works EMP) will be treated until performance indicators are met prior to discharge to land.
12. Performance criteria
(a) Soil neutralisation
Onsite soil treatment criteria are provided as a contingency and included in Section 10.2(d)(v).
Soil that has been treated by neutralisation techniques and has not met these criteria will be re-treated and re-tested until the Performance Criteria (provided in Section 10.2(d)(v)) or are met.
13. Timing of environmental activities
Construction works should not occur during wet months unless conditions are such that land degradation and surface water management problems can be avoided, or appropriate mitigation measures implemented.
If off-site disposal is required, licensed disposal facilities will be contacted prior to the commencement of works to confirm the volumes and timeframes around the works to ensure that the receiving facilities have capacity at the time of planned excavation works.
Prior to the commencement of dewatering activities, the baseline pH level, salinity and total dissolved solids (TDS) of trench water (as appropriate) in the area of the works will need to be established to allow for effective ongoing monitoring throughout the duration of the works.
14. Reporting
Records should be kept on site in relation to ASS management activities and any contingency actions that are implemented during the construction phase of the Project, including:
Records of any trench water monitoring.
Photographic evidence of water quality in the trench monitoring locations
Records of aglime quantities used to treat excavated ASS (if encountered) and acidic water to
consolidate the bulk aglime brought on to site against the amount used.
Soil excavation volumes, treatment volumes (if required) will be recorded daily during earthworks.
Records of any laboratory testing for soils and water samples.
15. Consultation and approvals
EPA Victoria was consulted on 19 August 2019. It was agreed that this ASS management protocol will be developed and included in the Pipeline Works EMP, which will be approved in accordance with the Pipeline Act 2005, in consultation with EPA Victoria.
17 AECOM
16. References
Dear, S. E., Ahern, C. R., O'Brien, L. E., Dobos, S. K., McElnea, A. E., Moore, N. G., & Watling, K. M. (2014). Queensland Acid Sulfate Soil Technical Manual: Soil Management Guidelines (p. 3). Brisbane: Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts, Queensland Government.
EPA Victoria (2009). Acid Sulfate Soil and Rock. Publication IWRG655.1. Environmental Protection Authority, Victoria.
Sullivan, L, Ward, N, Toppler, N and Lancaster, G (2018). National Acid Sulfate Soils guidance: National acid sulfate soils sampling and identification methods manual, Department of Agriculture and Water Resources, Canberra ACT. CC BY 4.0.
Victorian Coastal Acid Sulfate Soils Implementation Committee. & Price, Rebecca. & Victoria. Department of Sustainability and Environment (2010). Victoria's best practice guidelines for assessing and managing coastal acid sulfate soils. Melbourne. Dept. of Sustainability and Environment.
AECOM
Appendix A Figures
1 AECOM
Figures
Error! Unknown document property name.
Error! Unknown document property name.
Error! Unknown document property name.
AECOM
Appendix B Tables
1 AECOM
Tables
Error! Unknown document property name.
Error! Unknown document property name.
Error! Unknown document property name.
AECOM
Appendix C Field Screening Testing
and Interpretations
1 AECOM
Field Screening Testing and Interpretations
Method Description
The pH field (pHF) and pH peroxide (pHFOX) tests also called as screening tests provide a quick
indication of presence or absence of existing and potential acidity in soils. The tests are purely
qualitative and do not give a quantitative measure of the amount of acidity that has been or could be
produced through the oxidation process. This section has been referenced from National Acid Sulfate
Soil Sampling and Identification methods manual, Sullivan et al., 2018.
Equipment Needed
The following equipment is needed to conduct these tests in the field:
1. pH meter and electrode – charged and calibrated
5. Sodium hydroxide to raise pH of Hydrogen peroxide to pH 4.5 (if needed)
6. Deionised Water
7. Test tubes and/or plastic containers sufficient to hold 100 ml and rack
8. Gloves, paper towels, brushes and buckets for cleaning containers
9. Data recording sheets.
Procedure
The key steps are:
1. Calibrate pH meter as per manufacturer’s instructions
2. Measure pH of Deionised water and hydrogen peroxide
3. Remove approximately 1 teaspoon of soil from the profile. Place approximately half teaspoon of
4. soil into the pHf test tube and place half teaspoon of the soil into the pHfox test tube. It is important that these 2 sub-samples come from the same sample and that they are similar in characteristics
5. Add sufficient deionised water in one test tube to make a 1:5 soil water paste. Mix it carefully with wooden skewer and place the pH meter in it. Measure the pH of the soil water solution.
6. To the second test tube/ container, add few millilitres of 30% hydrogen peroxide sufficient to cover the soil and stir the mixture. Note the reaction of the soil using a reaction scale (given below)
7. Allow 5 to 10 min for any reactions to occur, do not leave unattended to ensure there is no cross contamination
8. If needed, keep on adding hydrogen peroxide (2-3 times) until the reaction has slowed (ensuring most sulphides have reacted).
9. Wait for soil peroxide mixture to cool before placing the pH electrode.
Reaction Scale
Reaction Rate Type of reaction
L Slight reaction
M Moderate reaction
2 AECOM
Reaction Rate Type of reaction
H High reaction
X Very vigorous reaction, gas evolution
and heat generation
Guidance on interpreting Field Screening
Tests:
A combination of three indicators is considered in arriving at a ‘positive field sulfide identification’ (i.e.
the presence of Potential Acid Sulfate Soils (PASS):
1. A reaction with hydrogen peroxide – the strength of the reaction with peroxide is a useful indicator but cannot be used alone. Organic matter, coffee rock and other soil constituents such as manganese oxides can also cause a reaction. Care should be exercised in interpreting a reaction on surface soils and high organic matter soils such as peats and coffee rock and some mangrove/estuarine muds and marine clays. This reaction should be rated, e.g. L = Low reaction, M = Medium reaction, H = High reaction, X = Extreme reaction, V = volcanic reaction.
2. The actual value of pHFOX. – if pHFOX is less than 3, and a significant reaction occurred, then it strongly indicates a PASS. The more the pHFOX drops below 3, the more positive the presence of inorganic sulfides.
3. A much lower pHFOX than field pHF – the lower the final pHFOX value and the greater the difference between the pHFOx compared to the pHF, the more indicative of the presence of PASS. This difference may not be as great if starting with an already very acid pHF (close to 4), but if the starting pH is neutral or alkaline then a larger change in pH should be expected. Where fine shell, coral or carbonate is present the change in pH may not be as large due to buffering. The ‘fizz test’ (effervescence with 1 M HCl) should be used to test for carbonates and shell. If these three factors, the final pHFOX value is the most conclusive.
The following interpretation will be adopted for field screening tests:
1. Strong Indicator of PASS – all three indicators present (pHFOX less than 3; M to H reaction, pHF – pHFOX less than 3)
2. Moderate Indicator of PASS – pHFOX greater than 3 and the remaining two indicators are positive
3. Low Indicator of PASS – pHfOX greater than 3 and one or none of the remaining indicators are positive
4. A pHF of less than 4 is likely to indicate the presence of AASS.
A sample with strong indicator of PASS need to be sent to laboratory for further analysis including
Chromium Reducible Sulfur (CRS) suite for net acidity and inorganic sulfur concentrations.
AECOM
Appendix D Acid sulfate soils field
indicators
AECOM
Acid sulfate soils field indicators
The following field indicators can assist in the identification of unexpected ASS encountered during the excavation works. If any of these indicators are observed outside of where ASS has been identified, a suitably qualified person will need to be engaged to conduct an assessment of the material as per the requirements of the CASS BPMG (2010).
Soil Type Indicators
Acid Sulfate Soil (ASS)
Landscape Characteristics 1. dominance of mangroves, reeds, rushes, and other marine,
estuarine or swamp-tolerant vegetation
2. low lying areas, back swamps, scalded or bare areas in coastal estuaries and floodplains
3. sulphurous smell after rain following a dry spell or when soil is disturbed
Actual Acid Sulfate Soil (AASS)
Soil Characteristics 1. field soil pH test results ≤ 4.0
2. presence of shell with or without orange-yellow staining or coating
3. any jarositic (jarosite is a pale-yellow mineral deposit which can precipitate as pore fillings and coatings on fissures) horizons or iron oxide mottling in auger holes or recently dug surfaces. With a Fluctuating water table, jarosite may be found along cracks and root channels in the soil. However, jarosite is not always found in actual sulfate soils
4. jarosite present in surface encrustations or in any material dredged or excavated and left exposed
Groundwater Characteristics 1. groundwater pH test results < 5.0
Surface Water Characteristics 1. water pH < 5.5 in adjacent streams, drains or groundwater
2. unusually clear or milky blue-green drain water within or flowing from the area (aluminium released by the acid sulfate soils acts as a flocculating agent)
3. extensive iron stains on any drain or pond surface, iron stained water or ochre deposits
Potential Acid Sulfate Soil (PASS)
Soil Characteristics 1. soil pH usually neutral but may be acidic when tested with the
pHfox test
2. offensive sulphurous odour
3. waterlogged soils, soft muds (blue-grey or dark green-grey, soft, buttery soils) or estuarine silty sands
4. mid to dark grey sands or bottom sediments of estuaries or dark grey tidal lakes
5. presence of shell
6. water characteristics
7. water pH usually neutral but may be acidic
Source: Victorian Best Practice Guidelines for Assessing and Managing Coastal Acid Sulfate (2010)