Tony D’Amore, VP, Product Research & Development 17 th Global Bioproduction Summit | 5-6 February 2018 | San Diego | USA Advances & Challenges in Vaccine Development and Manufacture
Tony D’Amore, VP, Product Research & Development17th Global Bioproduction Summit | 5-6 February 2018 | San Diego | USA
Advances & Challenges in Vaccine Development and Manufacture
Advances and Challenges in Vaccine Development and Manufacture
• Review of the constraints and complexity of vaccine product
development and manufacture
• Evolution of bioprocess and analytics innovation and technologies
to overcome these challenges
• Strategy and leveraging innovation and technology for rapid
product development (examples)
• What does the future look like?
2
Constraints and Complexity
Unique Aspects of Vaccines
• Vaccines are biologicals
• products derived from living organisms
• Vaccines are complex entities
• both in terms of their components and the technology required to produce them
• Vaccines (those receiving the vaccine)
• are generally healthy (for prophylaxis or preventative)
• whereas persons receiving drugs (for treatment) often have medical conditions
for which the drugs are prescribed
• risk: benefit requires high bar for safety
• Unlike biologics and drugs,
• vaccines are hard to make in a generic form and modernize
• so they retain their commercial value (no patent cliff)
4
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Principles of Vaccination.
http://www2a.cdc.gov/nip/isd/immtoolkit/content/products/pinkbook.pdf.
Accessed May 11, 2010.
Vaccines are Manufactured viaa Wide Variety of Cell Substrates
Novel antigens
often require novel
cell substrates
CHO E. coli
P. pastoris
S. cerevisiae
Per.C6 P. fluorescensN. meningitidisVero
MDCK SF9
SF21
S. pneumoniae
Hi-5
MAMMALIAN INSECT MICROBIAL FUNGAL
5
Vaccines Are Diverse
6
Polysaccharide
DNA plasmid
Virus Like Particles
Protein complexes
Viruses
Combinations
Plus Chemistry
Inc
rea
sin
g c
om
ple
xit
y Wide
Variations
in properties
Product
“characterize-
ability”
There are few
platform processes
Vaccine Industry Environment
Business Environment- High cost / high risk- Low investment- Few Suppliers / Fragile supply
Scientific / Medical Environment- New vaccine targets / technologies- Compliance revolution- Ever increasing safety expectations
Competitive Environment- Other big pharmaceuticals
Sanofi Pasteur, GSK,
Merck, Pfizer
- New biotech companies- New technology
Traditional Vaccine Environment- Regulatory environment- Static products- Static processes
7
Vaccine Product Development
8
is a Highly Regulated, Complex & Competitive Industry
Many Years 2-4 years 6-8 years 1 year 2 years continue
LaunchPre-clinical Proof
of Concept (POC) File
EXPLORATORY PRE-CLINICAL CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT REGISTRATION LCM
Desired outcomes
•Relentless cost pressure- return on investment
•Increasing competition- get to the clinic as soon as possible (minimize time)
•Localized manufacturing
•Quality Requirements are rigorous from the start of phase I
Industrial Challenges / Pressures
•Higher productivity
•Higher plant utilization: multi-products, different scales, flexible manufacturing
•Higher efficiency: less variability, failures, and waste
•Higher manufacturing quality standards
Desired outcomes
Safety Requirements Continue to Increase
9
Number of people Enrolled in Phase III Studies
A Glance at the History of Biotechnology
10
Data source: A.S. Verma “Biotechnology in the Realm of History” J Pharm Biollied Sci. 2011; 3(3): 321–323
Mab (1975)
PCR (1979)
Transgenic (1981)
Cloning (1982)
Human genome project (1990)
DNA structure (1953)
Pre-1800 1800 to ~mid of 20th
century
From post 2nd world war to present
The 80’s
Booming of biotechnology
Domestication of plants and animals
Fermentation
Ancient Classical Modern
Where will it end ?
Genetics, vaccines and antibiotics (from 1911- )
Constraints and Moving Forward
• The Challenge of Production
• Anticipation, quantity, quality
• Need
• Accelerate time to POC and focus portfolio
• Reduce cost, increase flexibility and quality
• How
• Leverage the evolution of bioprocess and analytics innovation and technologies to overcome these challenges
• Single use technologies, high throughput screening and innovation in analytics
11
Evolution and Innovation
Single Use & Disposable Technology Has Entered the Mainstream of Bioprocessing, including Vaccines
13
BioreactorClarification & concentration
Downstream processing
Formulation & filling
13
Single Use Bioreactors: Market Review
Wave bioreactor (GE) NucleoTM Single-Use Bioreactor (Pall)
Single use Bioreactor (Thermo Fisher)
Air-wheel bioreactor (PBS)
XDR bioreactor (Xcellerex/GE)
Biostat STR (Sartorius)
Mobius CellReady (Millipore)
14
Depth filters for Clarification: Market Review
Clarisolve (Millipore) Sartopure PP3 (Sartorius)
Diatomaceous Body Feed Filtration
(Sartorius)
Seitz V100P (Pall)
Zeta Plus (3M) Emphaze™ AEX Hybrid Purifier (3M)
15
Single Use Centrifuge for Cell Harvest & Clarification
16
UnifugeKsep
Single Use Chromatography: Market Review
17
Chromatography Columns
Chromatography Systems
Ready to Process (GE):
1, 2.5, 10 & 20LChromabolt (Millipore):
10, 20 &32cm ID
Opus columns (Repligen):
1.2-60cm ID
GoPure (Life
Technologies):
10, 20 &30cm
ID
MaxiChrom
(Atoll):
10, 20 &30cm ID
ÄKTA ready
(GE Healthcare)
Mobius FlexReady
(Millipore)
Limitation: All SU Chromatography flow paths and columns on the market are not sterile
Single Use Application – From Bench Top to 100-L Scale Process for Serum-Free Live Viral Product
18
Disposable Bioreactor
Disposable Mesh Bag (ThermoFisher
Scientific)
Disposable Mixing System
(Pall Life Science)
Disposable 20 µm / 3 µm/
0.65 µm depthfiltration system
Disposable Fluid Path HF TFF Manifold
(Spectrum Laboratory)
Disposable Mixing System
(Pall Life Science)
Disposable Fluid Path HF TFF Manifold
(Spectrum Laboratory)
Sterile Bulk Drug
Substance Bags
0.65 µm
3 µm
20 µm
1) Virus Release &
Microcarrier Separation2) Clarification Filtration by
Depth Filtration3) UF/DF by
TFF
4) DNA
Digestion
5) UF/DF
by TFF
Summary of Purification Process for Serum-Free Live Viral Product
• Successful demonstration of:
• Robust purification process with the following results:
• The virus yield was significantly increased from 20-40 doses /L to 400-500 dose /L – 10 fold increase
• The Vero DNA was significantly reduced to 1.35 ng/dose
• The purification process shortened from 3 to 2 days of operation
• Easy operation (no freeze-thaw, no centrifugation)
• Reduced number of production run (due to high yield)
• Reduced production cost
• Large scale (i.e. 100-L scale) purification in a closed disposable system
• Sterility assured
19
Conclusions and Points to Consider
• Completed multiple demonstration / material supply runs, and five
GMP runs with single use technology and closed system
• All products passed sterility testing
• Process scale up ongoing
• Industrial Challenges
• Developing quality processes while driving down operational costs
• Quality Requirements are rigorous from the start of phase I
• Always a balancing act, Cost and Time
• Application of single use technology provides opportunities
• Reduced fixed costs and equipment validation
• Increasing facility and process flexibility
• Accelerating process development
20
Cutting-Edge Technologies (1/2)
21
State-of-the-art filling line (isolator technology)Mathematical modeling & scale down model to solve scale up challenges
Cutting-Edge Technologies (2/2)
22
A completely closed system from manufacturing to formulation with single use technologies High throughput process development
Analytical New TechnologiesReal Time PCR
DNA Detection
Ion Torrent/ NGS
Genetic Stability
Bioinformatics
Computer Cluster
Illumina
Ad Agents/ NGS
Nucleic Acid Detection
Homogenous Time
Resolved Fluorescence
Biacore
Fortebio Multiplex MSD
Antigencity & Affinity
23
Hydrogen deuteriumexchange (HDX) MS
Quantitative MS
Protein
Sequencing
Mass SpectrometryDynamic Light
ScatteringMicro Flow Imaging
MasterSizer Coulter Counter
Particle Sizing
+
+
+
N C
HCl and microwave irradiation
A1A2A3A4………………………………….An-1An
+
C-t
erm
inal la
dde
r °°°
N-te
rm
inal la
dd
er •••
m/z
Deconvolution
Ion c
ounts
N-terminal sequence
A2 A3 A4 …. A7 …. An-3 …. An +
+
+
C-terminal sequence
An-1 …. An-3 …. A7 …. A4 A3 A2
m/zm/z
Ion c
ounts
Mass spectrometry
+
+
+
N C
HCl and microwave irradiation
A1A2A3A4………………………………….An-1An
++
C-t
erm
inal la
dde
r °°°
N-te
rm
inal la
dd
er •••
m/z
Deconvolution
Ion c
ounts
N-terminal sequence
A2 A3 A4 …. A7 …. An-3 …. An +
+
+
N-terminal sequence
A2 A3 A4 …. A7 …. An-3 …. An +
+
+
C-terminal sequence
An-1 …. An-3 …. A7 …. A4 A3 A2
m/zm/z
Ion c
ounts
Mass spectrometry
+
+
+
N C
HCl and microwave irradiation
A1A2A3A4………………………………….An-1An
+
C-t
erm
inal la
dde
r °°°
N-te
rm
inal la
dd
er •••
m/z
Deconvolution
Ion c
ounts
N-terminal sequence
A2 A3 A4 …. A7 …. An-3 …. An +
+
+
C-terminal sequence
An-1 …. An-3 …. A7 …. A4 A3 A2
m/zm/z
Ion c
ounts
Mass spectrometry
+
+
+
N C
HCl and microwave irradiation
A1A2A3A4………………………………….An-1An
++
C-t
erm
inal la
dde
r °°°
N-te
rm
inal la
dd
er •••
m/z
Deconvolution
Ion c
ounts
N-terminal sequence
A2 A3 A4 …. A7 …. An-3 …. An +
+
+
N-terminal sequence
A2 A3 A4 …. A7 …. An-3 …. An +
+
+
C-terminal sequence
An-1 …. An-3 …. A7 …. A4 A3 A2
m/zm/z
Ion c
ounts
Mass spectrometry
Mass Spectrometry (MS): Now and in the future
• Applications in Sanofi Pasteur Analytical R&D
• Highly accurate determination of protein intact mass
and AA sequence by LC-MS and LC-MS/MS to ID
target protein, HCP impurities, and truncations or other
covalent modifications
• Key challenges and future opportunities
• Quantitative MS - a single technology to assess antigen
content (surrogate of vaccine potency) at multiple
product stages
• Expand in-house capabilities beyond LC-MS through
acquisition of CE-MS instrumentation and development
of workflows/methods
24
Waters Synapt G2-S LC-MS with HDX module
Mascot MS databaseinfrastructure
Capillary Electrophoresis: Now and in the future
• Applications in Sanofi Pasteur Analytical R&D
• Purity and quantitation analysis of vaccine antigen protein(s) by SDS-CGE
• Quantitative stability-indicating assay for vaccine antigen protein
• Used or quantitation of MAbs
• Screening as replacement for SDS-PAGE for commercialized products
25
Protein antigen purity analysis:
SDS-CGE vs SDS-PAGE
Linearity of quantitative SDS-CGE
stability-indicating assay
HTS Platforms within Sanofi Pasteur
• Focus
• Prevent a circovirus-like crisis by detecting a broader range of adventitious agents
• Implement HTS as an alternative to in vivo (animal) and in vitro adventitious agents testing
• In 2011, began further exploring various HTS technologies and started development of an automated analysis pipeline - PhyloID™
“Cataloguing the Taxonomic Origins of Sequences from a Heterogeneous Sample using Phylogenomics: Applications
in Adventitious Agent Detection”, R.L. Charlebois, S.H.S. Ng, L. Gisonni-Lex and L. Mallet, PDA J Pharm Sci and
Tech, 68: 602-618, 2014
26
Illumina HiSeq 1500Illumina HiSeq 3000NextSeq500Ion Torrent PGM
Applications of High Throughput in Process Definition Studies
27
Conventional approach High throughput system
Column chromatography
TECAN/ Atoll mini columnAKTA Explorer & columns
• DoE studies were performed in parallel using the conventional approach and the high throughput system
• Generated fit model in JMP DoE program for prediction and design space• Comparative data analysis between the two systems
Analysis
SDS-PAGELabchip GXII (96 well) Electropharogram & virtual gel
ForteBio Octet RED96Western blot
HTPD & Automation Capability At Sanofi Pasteur
High throughputin sample
preparation(96 well format)
High throughput in sample analysis(96 well format).
Timely feedback to process
Method scouting, DoE studies,
high throughput sample
generation
28
TECAN Freedom EVO150
ForteBio Octet RED96 System
Zephyr Compact liquid handling
Microfluidic electrophoresis Caliper LabChip GXII
High throughput process development will only
become a reality when high throughput in-process test
capabilities are established
A
complete
high
throughput
platform
High Throughput System - Outcome • Comparable results were obtained between the conventional approach and high throughput
system (Identified similar trends for critical operating parameters between the two approaches)
• Significant time and material saving were achieved using the high throughput approach
• Suitable for purification process definition studies of soluble expressed proteins
29
Days required Conventional approach
(24 studies)
High throughput system
(24 studies)
For Experimental runs 50 days 6 days
For sample analysis 8 days 2 days
Total # of Days required 58 days 8 days
Equipment used Conventional approach High throughput system
Chromatography AKTA Explorer, 50 ml column TECAN, 600 µl column
Analysis SDS-PAGE, HPLC Labchip GXII (96 well), UPLC
What Does the Future Look Like – Opportunities/Challenges
• Continuous manufacturing
• Transformative technologies- e.g., mRNA
• Big data management
• Artificial intelligence, machine learning
• Scale-down modeling
• Molecular imprinting
• Novel adjuvants
• Immunomodulation
• Novel expression systems
30
Next Generation for MAb manufacturing platform
• Integrated and continuous process
• High volumetric productivity
• Minimal scale up
• Smaller facilities
• Disposables
• Limitation of Prot A media capacity
• Steady state high product quality
• Short cycle time / Minimal hold time
• Chemically defined media
• High degree of automation
31
Example:
Purified
ProductMedia
Generic platform facilitates the transposition in
continuous mode
Continuous Chromatography: Simulated Moving Bed Technology
32
www.chromacon.ch www.sembabio.com www.novasep.com
www.tarponbiosystems.com
www.ge.com
✓Closed system (zero biobuden) design
✓Fully SIPable✓4-column system✓Delta UV based control built in✓The 1st multi-column system at
GMP scale for biotech
Rahul Godawat, Late Stage Process Development, Genzyme, May 22nd 2014
Periodic counter-current chromatography (PCC)
©H
ans N
ele
man/G
ettyIm
ages