Top Banner
CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM U534, « Space and Action », Bron, France INSERM U534, « Space and Action », Bron, France
19

CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

Jan 17, 2016

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATIONCONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATIONAS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR

BEHAVIORBEHAVIOR

Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel DesmurgetEmmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel DesmurgetINSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, FranceINSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France

INSERM U534, « Space and Action », Bron, FranceINSERM U534, « Space and Action », Bron, France

Page 2: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

MOTOR BEHAVIOR: CONSTRAINEDMOTOR BEHAVIOR: CONSTRAINED

AMPLITUDE / VELOCITYAMPLITUDE / DURATION

Gordon et al. (1994)

Amplitude (cm)

Page 3: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

MOTOR BEHAVIOR: CONSTRAINEDMOTOR BEHAVIOR: CONSTRAINED

KINEMATICINVARIANCE

Gordon et al. (1994)

Page 4: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

MOTOR BEHAVIOR: CONSTRAINEDMOTOR BEHAVIOR: CONSTRAINED

CONSTRAINTS ACROSS DIRECTIONS

Gordon et al. (1994)

Page 5: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

MOTOR BEHAVIOR: CONSTRAINEDMOTOR BEHAVIOR: CONSTRAINED

SPEED VS ACCURACY

Fitts (1954)Jeannerod (1988)

W = 2 inW = 1W = 0.5W = 0.25

*

Page 6: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

MOTOR BEHAVIOR: FLEXIBLEMOTOR BEHAVIOR: FLEXIBLE

INDEPENDENT CONTROLOF KINEMATICS AND

ACCURACY

Gribble et al. (2003)

Page 7: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

KNOWN PRINCIPLESKNOWN PRINCIPLESAmplitude/duration OCOC (Harris&Wolpert 1998)

Kinematic invariance OCOC (Flash&Hogan 1985 - Harris&Wolpert 1998)

Across directions ? (but see Todorov 1998)

Speed/accuracyOFC + SEN (Hoff&Arbib 1993) or SDNSDN (Todorov 2003)OC + SDN (Harris&Wolpert 1998)

Kinematics/accuracy ?

Trajectory OC (Uno et al. 1989) - EPT (Gribble et al. 1998)

EMG OC (Dornay et al. 1996) - EPT (Flanagan et al. 1990)

Online correctionOFC (Hoff&Arbib 1993 - Todorov&Jordan 2002)EPT (Flanagan et al. 1993)

Redundancy SOFC (Todorov&Jordan 2002)

Central command ? (but see Todorov 2000)

OCOC: optimal control - OFCOFC: optimal feedback control - SOFCSOFC: stochastic OFCEPTEPT: equilibrium-point theory - SDNSDN: signal-dependent noise - SENSEN: state-estimation noise

Page 8: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

CURRENT PRINCIPLESCURRENT PRINCIPLES

• Optimal feedback controlOptimal feedback controlConstraints: to reach the goal (zero-error)Objective (cost): to minimize the controls (effort)

• Constant effortConstant effortFor given instructions, all movements areperformed with the same effort

• CocontractionCocontraction as an independent parameter

• State-estimation noiseState-estimation noiseInaccuracy in estimation of position and velocityIncreases with velocityDecreases with cocontraction (fusimotor control)

Page 9: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

Muscles as force generator.No force/length effects.No force/velocity effects.No stretch reflex.No biarticular muscles.

No static forces.No viscosity.Same formulation for OFC.Solved numerically (Bryson 1999).

OPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEMOPTIMAL CONTROL PROBLEM

Page 10: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

KINEMATICSKINEMATICS

Page 11: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

EMGsEMGs

SHOULDER ELBOW

Page 12: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

AMPLITUDE / DURATIONAMPLITUDE / DURATION

Page 13: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

KINEMATIC INVARIANCEKINEMATIC INVARIANCE

Also holds for changesin inertial load.

Page 14: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

DIRECTIONAL VARIATIONSDIRECTIONAL VARIATIONS

Page 15: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

KINEMATICS & ACCURACYKINEMATICS & ACCURACY

- OFCOFC + SENSEN- Estimation of endpoint position: linear forward model- Gaussian noise on velocity- Variability: determinant of terminal covariance matrix

SHOULDER

ELBOW

- Same amplitude- Same duration- Similar kinematics- Different accuracy

Page 16: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

WHAT ARE THE CONTROLS?WHAT ARE THE CONTROLS?

Sergio&Kalaska (1998)

SHOULDER FLEXOR CONTROL

Page 17: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

DIRECTIONAL TUNINGDIRECTIONAL TUNING

Sergio&Kalaska (1998)

FLEXOR EXTENSOR

SH

OU

LD

ER

EL

BO

W

Page 18: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

SUMMARYSUMMARY

• Known principles OPTIMAL FEEDBACK CONTROLOPTIMAL FEEDBACK CONTROLSTATE-ESTIMATION NOISESTATE-ESTIMATION NOISE

TrajectoryEMGSpeed/accuracyCentral command

• New principles CONSTANT EFFORTCONSTANT EFFORTCOCONTRACTIONCOCONTRACTION

Amplitude/durationKinematic invarianceConstraints across directionsKinematics/accuracy

Page 19: CONSTANT EFFORT COMPUTATION AS A DETERMINANT OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR Emmanuel Guigon, Pierre Baraduc, Michel Desmurget INSERM U483, UPMC, Paris, France INSERM.

DISCUSSIONDISCUSSION

• Kinematic invarianceWithout desired trajectory.

• Constant effortMovements are selected not byminimizing a cost, but by choosinga cost level

• Limitations / Extensions- Static forces- Limitations of force control (Ostry&Feldman

2003)- Accuracy/stability: viscoelastic properties- Adaptation to force fields and inertial loads