Considerations on integration, mechanics and cooling R. Santoro, D. Perini ITS Upgrade plenary meeting, 29-May 2011
Jan 18, 2018
Considerations on integration, mechanics and cooling
R. Santoro, D. PeriniITS Upgrade plenary meeting, 29-May 2011
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 2
Outlook ITS integration before the upgrade Upgrade requirement Upgrade conceptual design Basic ideas on cooling and thermal coupling structures
R. Santoro
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 3
ALICE DetectorInner Tracking System (ITS) Three different silicon detector technologies, two
layers each Pixels (SPD), Drift (SDD), double side Strips (SSD)
Side C
SSD
SDD
SPDParameter Pixels Drifts Strips radius (inner plane) cm 3.9 15.0 38.0 radius (outer plane) cm 7.6 23.9 43.0 length ±z (inner layer) cm 14.1 22.2 43.1 length ±z (outer layer) cm 14.1 29.7 48.9 cell size (r z) µm2 50 425 202 294 95 40000 spatial precision (r) µm 12 35 20 spatial precision (z) µm 100 25 830 max. occupancy (Pb-Pb central) % 2.1 2.5 4 max. expected dose (10 years) Gy 2,7x103 2,5x102 5x101 total area m2 0.21 1.3 5 total no. of channels 9.8 M 133 k 2.6 M material budget (both layers) % X0 2.28 2.39 1.69
SSD
SDD
SPD
Side A
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 4
Silicon Pixel Detector (SPD)
2 layers of silicon pixel detector grouped in 2 half barrels to be mounted face to face around the beam pipe
Half-barrelOuter surface
Half-barrelInner surface
Half-barreland services
R. Santoro
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 5
SPD positioning
R. Santoro
Beryllium Beam pipe
1st half-barrel
SPD Internal mean radius 3.9 cmBeam pipe radius 3 cm
1st half-barrelin place
2nd half-barrelin place
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 6
Positioning of the rest of ITS and TPCSDD+SSD moved over the SPD to form the ITS
SDD + SSDSPD fully connected
on side C
ITS fully connected on side C
TPC
TPC moved over the ITS
R. Santoro
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 7
ITS: side view
R. Santoro
Absorber
Forward Detectors
Drift and StripSilicon detectors
Side A Side C
Silicon Pixel Detectors and
mechanical structure
Beam Pipe
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 8
ITS upgrade under discussion Main requirements
Low material budget (less than 0.5% X/X0) First layer as closer as possible to the interaction point to improve the impact parameter
Radius of the new beam pipe will be 20mm Fast insertion / extraction of the inner layers: winter shut down (less than 10 weeks)
Services routed only on side A. The absorber blocks the access on the other side New tracker in the forward region: end caps between ITS and absorber
Conical beam pipe is requested to reduce the material budget for tracks at high η Operating at room temperature
First scenario under study: insertion of 1 extra layer of pixel detector Reduced effort, but incompatible with the conical beam pipe
Second scenario under study: 3 new layers of silicon pixel detectors Compatible with the conical beam pipe and the Muon Forward Tracker (MFT) Further improvement wrt the 1st scenario in terms of impact parameter
Third scenario under study: 7 new layers of silicon detectors 3 (or 4) layers of pixels 4 (or 3) layers of strip End cups on both sides
R. Santoro
AbsorberDrift and StripSilicon detectors
Side A Side C
Beam Pipe
Space for the new pixel detector
ITS: side view
AbsorberDrift and StripSilicon detectors
Side A Side C
Beam Pipe
ITS: side view Space for the conical beam pipe
and the Muon Forward
Tracker
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 11R. Santoro
Requirements for the Scenario 2 3 insertable new pixel layers + SDD + SSD and space for MFT
Beam pipe 20 mm
Drift constrain 100 mm
Number of staves (#S) / layer Free
Mean sensors radial position (3 layers) 23mm (1st), 47mm (2nd), 90mm (3th)
Detector area (rphy x z) 15 x free mm2
Dead area (rphy) 2.5 mm (hybrid option)2 x 2.5 mm in opposite sides (MALICE option)
Stave length (z) if |η| = 1 and σz=7.94cm 220mm (1st), 270mm (2nd), 365mm (3th)
Power consumption As low as possible: reasonable range 0.25 - 0.5 W/cm2
Services2 x #S flat cables for the power (200 mu thick?)1 x #S optical links (1 or 2 fibers per optical link) 2 x #S cooling tubes (not needed in case of air cooling)
Total material budget (X/X0) per layer As low as possible: upper limit 0.5 %
Hybrid option material budget contribution
Total = 0.5%- Detector (sensor = 100 um + FEE = 50 um) = 0.16 %- Bus (half of the actual bus or even better) < 0.24 % - Mechanics/cooling = 0.1 % (200µm carbon fiber equivalent)
Monolithic option material budget contribution
Total = 0.39 %- Detector (50 um) = 0.055 %- Bus (half of the actual bus or even better) < 0.24 % - Mechanics/cooling = 0.1 % (200µm carbon fiber equivalent)
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 12R. Santoro
New pixel detector: first conceptual design 3 layers of SI-pixel sensors: 1st layer at 23 mm from the IP Full structure divided in 2 half, to be mounted around the beam pipe and to be moved
along the beam pipe towards the final position Modules fixed to the 2 carbon fiber wheels All the services on side A
Carbon Fiber skin
3 Si-pixelLayers
Carbon fiber support wheel
Cooling tubes
Options under discussion rφ ermeticity Cooling:
Water, CO2 and fluorocarbons Single and double phase
Thermal coupling structures Carbon foam (used in this draw) Polyimide micro-channel Silicon micro-channel
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 13
Muon Forward Tracker
R. Santoro
Side C
Conical beam pipe
Free space for the MFT
Requirements 6 planes of pixel detectors between the ITS and the muon absorber (MFT)
3°- 9° of acceptance with respect to the beam line (range @ -3η) Conical beam pipe is required to reduce the beam pipe material budget at these angles
Under study Mechanical integration Feasibility of such a beam pipe Coexistence of Barrel (|η| < 1) and
forward acceptance
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 14
Carbon Foam: Conceptual design
Inspired on ATLAS and PANDA design
R. Santoro
Single module Side view
Carbon fiber support skin
Carbon foam
Inlet / outlet Cooling tube
Volume indicating sensor + electrical bus
Suitable for all the coolant options: water, CO2 and fluorocarbons Suitable for single and double phases cooling Studies are needed to select the material and to optimize thickness / geometry for the optimal
rigidity
Layout details Carbon fiber skin 200µm thick (x/x0 ≈ 0.1%) Carbon foam
1st layer: 500µm thick in the central part (x/x0 ≈ 0.07%)
2nd and 3rd layers: 900µm thick in the central part (x/x0 ≈ 0.125%)
Peek tube: Øext 1.2mm / Øint 1mm (x/x0 ≈ 0.12 %)
Estimated material budget: 1st layer
Central part (≈0.17 %) Along the tubes (≈0.26 % + liquid)
2nd and 3rd layers: Central part (x/x0 ≈ 0.225%) Along the tubes (≈0.275 % + liquid)
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 15
Polyimide micro-channel
R. Santoro
Pyralux® LF7001 (Kapton®) 24µm
Pyralux® PC 1020 (polyimide) 200µm
Pyralux® LF110 (Kapton®) 50µm
Material budget considerations with single phases cooling Water or C6F14
Fabrication process Starting point: sheet 50 µm of LF110 lamination 200 µm of Photo imageable coverlay
4 layers of PC1020 Creation of the grooves by photolithography process @ 180°C glue by hot pressing the sheet 24 µm LF7001 on top of the
structure Cure all the object @ 180°C for 10 Hours.
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 16
Polyimide Micro-channel Layout optimization
R. Santoro
Analytic evaluation with simplified geometry (inlet and outlet in opposite sides) to optimize the micro-channel dimension
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 17
CFD analysis: water
R. Santoro Outlet section channelInlet section channel Middle section channel
Axonometric view single
channel
L = 20 cm
W= 1.6 cm
T water in 15°C
T water out 18°C
INOUT
16.65 °C
20.62 °CT water in
15°C
T water out 18°C
Upper surface
N° 16 channels800 X 200 µm
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 18R. Santoro
The prototype with the optimized geometry has been delivered House made connectors for test purpose have been produced Characterization tests are on the way:
Geometrical measurements Ducts area: CNC Machine (Mitutoyo) surface roughness: NTEGRA platform (atomic force microscope)
Mechanical test Leak test Mechanical resistance Strain –stress behavior
Thermo fluid dynamic test Cooling performance Vs fluid dynamic at working condition
Polyimide micro-channel: on-going activities
Si-Micro-channel: Conceptual design Micro-channels made on silicon plates by etching and covered with Si-plate by fusion bonding
no CTE mismatch and high pressure resistance Two layouts are under discussion
Distributed micro-channels: material budget equally distributed below the sensitive area Sideline micro-channels: micro-channels confined at the chip’s border, where there is the major power
consumption (first prototype in July)
Distributed micro-channels
x/x0 < 0.16%x/x0 = 0.05% (no liquid inside)x/x0 = 0.08% (C4F10)
Further considerations Suitable with double-phases cooling (C02 or fluorocarbons)
Simulation and R&D are needed Limitation: the length of the wafer is presently <= 100 mm Layout optimization and services to be studied
Sideline micro-channels
hole
%X0 = 0 in the sensitive area !!
Common Inlet pipe
Module n
Module n+1
Common return pipe
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 20
Summary
R. Santoro
The ITS upgrade requirements has been discussed Main focus was on the 2nd scenario: 3 new layers of pixel detectors with the possibility to allocate
a conical beam pipe
A first mechanics conceptual design was shown Big effort in the integration is now needed
Material budget of the order of 0.1% for mechanical support and cooling is the goal at least for the first layer
The different options concerning cooling and thermal coupling were discussed Carbon foam: simulation and material procurement for tests are needed Polyimide micro-channel: simulation is progressing well and the prototype has been delivered.
The tests are on the way Silicon micro-channel: discussions on prototype design is started
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 21
Spare
R. Santoro
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 22R. Santoro
1st layer
2nd layer
1,5
x/x0
Skin 0,1
Foam 0,300 0,042
Tube 0,12
Total 0,262
1,6
x/x0
Skin 0,1
Foam 0,400 0,056
Tube 0,12
Total 0,276
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 23
CFD analysis: C6F14
R. Santoro Outlet section channelInlet section channel Middle section channel
Axonometric view single
channelINOUT
17.16 °C
26.01 °CT C6F14 in
15°C
Upper surface
T C6F14 out 18°C
L = 20 cm
W= 1.6 cm
T water in 15°C
T water out 18°C
N° 16 channels800 X 200 µm
Power consumption0.5 W/cm2
Outlet section channel
Results CFD analysis [H2O vs C6F14]
Cosimo Pastore & Irene Sgura ( Politecnico di Bari & INFN Bari) 20-04-2011 16
Assonometric view single
channel
Outlet section channel
H2O C6F14
INOUT
CONSIDERATIONSA) @ height channel 200 mm the thermo-fluid dynamic H2O behavior IS MORE EFFICIENT then C6F14.
B) WATER doesn’t allow (very difficult) to reduce the height of the channel minor then 200 mm due to the pressure drops (no leak- less mode)
ITS upgrade plenary meeting 25
μ-channels in NA62
R. Santoro
Channels 100 µm deep
Manifolds 280 µm deep
Interface to the connector
First prototypes tested successfully!
IN
OUT
flow
Pictures taken from NA62 GTK WG meeting presentation - P. Petagna
NA62 requirements:• Acceptable DT over sensing area ~ 5 °C• Dimensions of sensing area: ~ 60 x 40 mm
• Max heat dissipation: ~ 2 W/cm2 • Target T on Si sensor ~ -10 °C
Forward spectrometer – conceptual design
• Conceptual design– Highly segmented calorimeter at
small angles• Electromagnetic front section
– Sandwich silicon-tungsten– 30 longitudinal layers– Sensitive layers:
MAPS technology, e.g. MIMOSA/ULTIMATE (20mm x 20mm)
• Hadron section– Sandwich tungsten/iron-scintillator– 60 longitudinal layers– Sensitive layers:
scintillators (3cm x 3cm) read out by Multi-Pixel Avalanche Photodiodes (ala PSD @ NA61)
– Rebuilt (wide gap) and relocated compensator magnet
– Low mass beam pipe– Silicon pixel tracker close to the IP
R. Santoro 26