CONSIDERATIONS FOR HTLS CONDUCTORS Barrett M. Kimball, Director of Engineering, Southwire Erik Ruggeri, Principal Engineer, POWER Engineers, INC
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
CONSIDERATIONS FOR HTLS CONDUCTORS
Barrett M. Kimball, Director of Engineering, SouthwireErik Ruggeri, Principal Engineer, POWER Engineers, INC
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
CIGRE (Conseil International des Grands Réseaux Électriques) : Who they are and their goals:
• Established in 1921• 59 National
Committees representing over 90 countries
• 15,000 members
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
Best Paths: A European Consortium whose goal is to facilitate renewable energy into the European market.
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
CONDUCTOR TESTING PROGRAM
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
HTLS CONDUCTORS STUDIED:• ACPR: Aluminum Conductor Polymer matrix Reinforced
Polymer
• (Z)TACSR: Thermal resistant and Super Thermal (ZT) resistant Aluminum alloy Conductor Steel Reinforced
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
HTLS CONDUCTORS STUDIED:• TACIR & ZTACIR: Thermal resistant Aluminum alloy Aluminum Clad
Invar
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
HTLS CONDUCTORS STUDIED:• G(Z)TACSR: Gap Type Super thermal resistant Aluminum alloy Steel
Reinforced
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
• ACSS: Aluminum Conductor Steel Supported
• ACCR: Aluminum Conductor Composite Reinforced• ACCC: Aluminum Conductor Composite Conductor
Carbon
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
HTLS CONDUCTORS STUDIED:• Lamifil’s ACCC ice+soft and ACCC ice+hard
• Soft: Designed for up to 2” ice• Hard: Coming soon – designed for very large ice loads
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
1907: ACSR was introduced. Over a century of experience exists for ACSR.
1917: AAAC developed to free up steel for the war effort
1973: Reynolds Aluminum introduced SSAC. Reynolds exited the conductor industry in 2000. ACSS became a commodity available from numerous suppliers.
2002: ACCR (3M) and ACCC® (CTC) composite core conductors
2004: Southwire ACSS/HS285® (comeback for steel core)
2014: Southwire C7® composite core conductor
2017: Southwire Max Storm™ high-resiliency conductor (ZTAL high-temperature aluminum over UHS steel)
Conductor Brief History
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
ACSS conductors, unlike ACSR conductors, are not capacity-limited by concerns over annealing the hard-drawn aluminum strands. ACSR annealing concerns include: Loss of strength (typical ACSR conductors get 60% of their strength from the
aluminum component) Sag increase due to increased creep
ACSS conductors have pre-annealed aluminum strands. There is no concern over in-service annealing
ACSS conductors have more predictable creep characteristics, because the everyday tension is supported by the steel core which has negligible creep relative to aluminum creep
ACSS conductors have less sag increase at high-temperature, because steel has only half of the thermal elongation of aluminum
ACSS conductors are naturally self-damping
ACSS and ACSS/HS285
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
Bobbin Annealing (Reynolds) Process
Aluminum strands are oven-annealed on the strander bobbins.
Stranding fully-annealed aluminum is challenging, because the bobbin brake and closing die settings need to respect the softness and low tensile strength of annealed aluminum strands
The stranding mills understandably take advantage of the allowable tensile range for O-temper aluminum – above 11 kpsi is typical
Ultimate stress does not predict the yield stress
Strain-hardening of the aluminum is unavoidable at the closing dies for each layer. Mechanical interference is needed to size the OD. The degree of strain hardening depends on the mechanical interference, which changes as the dies wear.
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
Batch Annealing (all Southwire ACSS)
In 1994 ACSS batch annealing was developed: hard-drawn aluminum is stranded using ACSR settings for bobbin brakes and closing dies
Annealing is done after stranding – the entire take-up reel is placed in the annealing oven
Due to the long soak times required for a massive reel, batch-annealing produces consistently dead soft aluminum strands
With batch-annealing, the aluminum temper is not affected by variation in the stranding process.
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
High-purity aluminum rod is required by the Southwire process to ensure consistent annealing. A side benefit is improved conductivity for lower line loss. ASTM minimum conductivity for 1350-O is 61.8% IACS. Southwire internal controls require a minimum of 63% IACS (implying 2% lower line loss).
Southwire’s Cofer Technology Center has tested both bobbin-annealed and batch-annealed ACSS, and has consistently found a significant difference.
Southwire SAG10® software shows a 6% to 10% decrease in high-temperature sag for Southwire ACSS compared to bobbin-annealed (Reynolds-process) ACSS. PLS-CADD software mirrors SAG10 results.
Southwire’s Cofer Technology Center has evaluated ACSS self-damping characteristics, and found that Southwire ACSS can be regarded as self-damping even in early life. The current engineering consensus is that bobbin-annealed ACSS may need dampers to prevent fatigue failures.
What is Special about Southwire ACSS?
Copyright © 2018 Southwire Company. All Rights Reserved
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
16
“Reynolds Legacy” (Same Data) Stress-Strain Chart – Type 16 ACSS
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
17
“Batch-Annealed” Stress-Strain Chart – Type 16 ACSS
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
11.3 kpsi ultimate @ >20%
10.2 kpsi ultimate @ >20%
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
19
Effect of Coefficients on Sag Prediction
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
20
Recent-Production ACSS vs. Reynolds Coefficients
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
Significance of Aluminum Temper in ACSS
• On first consideration, stronger is better – harder aluminum will increase the conductor breaking strength (but not the RBS, which is computed based on allowable aluminum tensile strength)
• However, follow that logic to its conclusion, and you are back at ACSR (fully hard-drawn aluminum)
• Batch-annealing advantages• Better consistency – no dependency on stranding parameters• Slightly higher conductivity due to deeper annealing• Significantly less contribution to thermal sag (more charts to follow)• Improved early-life self damping: no dampers are required for ACSS with dead-soft aluminum
Copyright © 2018 Southwire Company. All Rights Reserved
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
Type 13 (medium steel fraction) ACSS/MA5 Comparison
22
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
Type 13 ACSS/MA3 Batch-Annealed vs. ACSS/MA5 Bobbin-Annealed
23
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
HS285 vs MA5
24
• ACSS/MA5 and ACSS/HS285 are not the same:o ACSS/HS285 steel core tensile properties are verified after heat-aging. ACSS/MA5 is sold
without regard for loss-of-strength due to future high-temperature ACSS operationo ASTM B958 (MA5/UHS core) specifications are based on Southwire’s proprietary HS285
specification, first published in 2004. ASTM B958 does not contain the heat aging requirement for the steel strand.
o Southwire has always required the finished ACSS and ACSS/HS285 meet the nominal strength requirements. This means we account for the loss-of-strength due to stress-relief annealing of the steel core during batch-annealing
• Southwire ACSS, including ACSS/HS285 is batch-annealed, resulting in:o Tighter strandingo Less high-temperature sag (be sure to use Southwire Certified data for design)o Self-dampingo More consistent properties. The mission-critical yield stress is not specified or even
measured. Southwire’s process is consistent (dead soft).
Copyright © 2018 Southwire Company. All Rights Reserved
SEPTEMBER 5 - 7, 2018
Questions??