Top Banner
Collective Efficacy, Conflict & Group Performance over time GROUP-4 Fareen Mansur 133102360 Imran Hossain 1321071660 Raktim Mojumder 1411872666 Md. Nahid Hasan 1320543660 Mir Sozzadur Rahman 1311284060
16

Conflict

Jul 21, 2016

Download

Documents

Imran Hossain

Management and organizational behaviour
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Conflict

Collective Efficacy, Conflict & Group Performance over time

GROUP-4Fareen Mansur 133102360Imran Hossain 1321071660Raktim Mojumder 1411872666Md. Nahid Hasan 1320543660Mir Sozzadur Rahman 1311284060

Page 2: Conflict

Background of the studyCOLLECTIVE EFFICACY

• What is collective efficacy?

• The importance of collective efficacy

• Collective Efficacy at individual level & group level

• The downside of collective efficacy

• The discrepancy between the belief that collective

efficacy leads to success and the idea that collective

efficacy may cause groups to eventually fail

Page 3: Conflict

Group ConfidenceConfidenceAffect on Long-term planning

Overconfidence

Page 4: Conflict

In General

Group Perform

ance

Collective efficacy

Group’s confidence

Process conflict

Long term decisions

Page 5: Conflict

The Hypothesis• Hypothesis 1 :

Surface level diversity & collective efficacy

• Hypothesis 2 :

Early collective efficacy & group performance

• Hypothesis 3 :

Early collective efficacy & early process conflict

Page 6: Conflict

The Hypothesis• Hypothesis 4 :

Early process conflict & group performance

• Hypothesis 5 :

Late collective efficacy & group performance

• Hypothesis 6 :

Late process conflict & group performance

Page 7: Conflict

The Methodology Two types of Study :

1) Preliminary Study 2) The Main Study

Preliminary Study

• Study Overview

At beginning period and end period

• Sample and Procedure

167 Participants, 53% Male, 42 Teams

• Measures

Control Variables:

Control Size

Average level of Interest

Page 8: Conflict

The Methodology 3. Group Performance: A Final Written Report A Scale of 0 – 100• Result Early Collective Efficacy was Negative Late Collective Efficacy was PositiveThe Main Study• Study Overview Followed Preliminary Study• Sample and Procedure 262 Participants, 53% Male, 72 Teams• Measures1. Collective Efficacy A Continuous 100 Point Scale 0 = not at all certain , 100 = absolutely certain

2. Process Conflict A Three Item Scale

Page 9: Conflict

The Methodology 3. Other types of intra-group conflict: Two types Conflict during early stage Task Conflict Relationship Conflict A Three Item Scale4. Group Performance: A Final Written Report A Scale of 0 – 100

• Study Variables Means Standard Deviation Correlation

Page 10: Conflict

ResultsPath Analysis

Factors that do not effect group performance

• Average age

• Average year of schooling

• Percentage of males in group

Page 11: Conflict

Results (Contd.)Relation between

• Collective Efficacy & Surface Level Diversity.

• Early Process Conflict & Collective Efficacy.

• Process Conflict & Group Performance.

• Group Performance & Collective Efficacy.

Page 12: Conflict

Results (Contd.)Factors that effect group performance

• Early Collective Efficacy

• Early Process Conflict

• Late Collective Efficacy

Page 13: Conflict

Results (Final)Two Additional Path Analysis

Small Sample Size

Focus on Process Conflict

Page 14: Conflict

Outcomes

Objective Feedback

Past Performance

Collective Efficacy

Page 15: Conflict

Process Conflict• Best use of Which, Whom, When & How !!

• Sorting

• Can be gain either by shared norms or alternative viewpoints

• Is linked with Long-Term decisions making

Page 16: Conflict

Thank You !!