Collective Efficacy, Conflict & Group Performance over time GROUP-4 Fareen Mansur 133102360 Imran Hossain 1321071660 Raktim Mojumder 1411872666 Md. Nahid Hasan 1320543660 Mir Sozzadur Rahman 1311284060
Collective Efficacy, Conflict & Group Performance over time
GROUP-4Fareen Mansur 133102360Imran Hossain 1321071660Raktim Mojumder 1411872666Md. Nahid Hasan 1320543660Mir Sozzadur Rahman 1311284060
Background of the studyCOLLECTIVE EFFICACY
• What is collective efficacy?
• The importance of collective efficacy
• Collective Efficacy at individual level & group level
• The downside of collective efficacy
• The discrepancy between the belief that collective
efficacy leads to success and the idea that collective
efficacy may cause groups to eventually fail
Group ConfidenceConfidenceAffect on Long-term planning
Overconfidence
In General
Group Perform
ance
Collective efficacy
Group’s confidence
Process conflict
Long term decisions
The Hypothesis• Hypothesis 1 :
Surface level diversity & collective efficacy
• Hypothesis 2 :
Early collective efficacy & group performance
• Hypothesis 3 :
Early collective efficacy & early process conflict
The Hypothesis• Hypothesis 4 :
Early process conflict & group performance
• Hypothesis 5 :
Late collective efficacy & group performance
• Hypothesis 6 :
Late process conflict & group performance
The Methodology Two types of Study :
1) Preliminary Study 2) The Main Study
Preliminary Study
• Study Overview
At beginning period and end period
• Sample and Procedure
167 Participants, 53% Male, 42 Teams
• Measures
Control Variables:
Control Size
Average level of Interest
The Methodology 3. Group Performance: A Final Written Report A Scale of 0 – 100• Result Early Collective Efficacy was Negative Late Collective Efficacy was PositiveThe Main Study• Study Overview Followed Preliminary Study• Sample and Procedure 262 Participants, 53% Male, 72 Teams• Measures1. Collective Efficacy A Continuous 100 Point Scale 0 = not at all certain , 100 = absolutely certain
2. Process Conflict A Three Item Scale
The Methodology 3. Other types of intra-group conflict: Two types Conflict during early stage Task Conflict Relationship Conflict A Three Item Scale4. Group Performance: A Final Written Report A Scale of 0 – 100
• Study Variables Means Standard Deviation Correlation
ResultsPath Analysis
Factors that do not effect group performance
• Average age
• Average year of schooling
• Percentage of males in group
Results (Contd.)Relation between
• Collective Efficacy & Surface Level Diversity.
• Early Process Conflict & Collective Efficacy.
• Process Conflict & Group Performance.
• Group Performance & Collective Efficacy.
Results (Contd.)Factors that effect group performance
• Early Collective Efficacy
• Early Process Conflict
• Late Collective Efficacy
Results (Final)Two Additional Path Analysis
Small Sample Size
Focus on Process Conflict
Outcomes
Objective Feedback
Past Performance
Collective Efficacy
Process Conflict• Best use of Which, Whom, When & How !!
• Sorting
• Can be gain either by shared norms or alternative viewpoints
• Is linked with Long-Term decisions making
Thank You !!