Top Banner
Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008
14
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

Conditionality VS Ownership:A resolvable paradox?

Cairo, 19 January 2008

Page 2: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

2

President Amadou Toumani Toure of Mali, Development Cooperation Forum 2005

“True partnership supposes autonomy of beneficiary countries in requesting aid and in determining its objectives… Often programs are imposed on us, and we are told it is our program…People who have never seen cotton come to give us lessons on cotton… No one can respect the conditionalities of certain donors. They are so complicated that they themselves have difficulty getting us to understand them. This is not a partnership. This is a master relating to his student.”

Page 3: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

3

World Bank Conditionality Review, 2005

“Traditional conditionality has often been judged as overly and increasingly intrusive, infringing national sovereignty (Drazen 2002), undermining domestic democratic process and institutions (Stiglitz 1999), and ineffective in bringing about the desired outcomes (Easterly 2005)”

“Traditional conditionality in policy-based lending has often been criticized as being ineffective and intrusive”

Page 4: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

4

“Policy conditionality…is both an infringement on sovereignty and ineffective” Africa Commission, 2005

World Bank and IMF Conditionality reviews:

- In 2002, IMF Conditionality Guidelines- In 2005, WB Good Practice Principles for the application of conditionality

Main objectives:

- Streamline conditionality;- Apply the principles of ownership, harmonisation, criticality, customisation, and transparency.

Page 5: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

5

World Bank: KEY FACTS

Eurodad’s research published in November 2007:- On average, each WB operation still contains 37 conditions- 71% of the WB operations still attach conditions containing sensitive policy reforms, such as privatisation and liberalisation

25%

42%

25%

8%

Economic policy

Public sector reform

Human and social development

Environment, rural and urban development

Page 6: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

6

IMF: KEY FACTS

IMF Independent Evaluation Office 2007 reports:

- Number of structural conditions per operation unchanged;- IMF conditions are not critical;- Sectors:

- privatisation and liberalisation of the financial and banking sector;

- reforms of the fiscal systems; - Almost one fifth of the conditions are privatisation and

liberalisation conditions.- Quantitative conditionality still overly stringent and undermining economic growth.

Page 7: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

7

Mapping out the brave ones

Conditionality-friendless donors:

- Norway, 2006: Soria Moria Declaration on International Policy

- UK, 2006: White Paper “Eliminating World Poverty”

- Germany, the Netherlands, Italy: not quite there yet, but on their way…

- European Commission

Page 8: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

8

The EC’s shift to outcome-based conditionality

“Drawing on lessons from previous structural adjustment programmes and the recognition of the central importance of ownership, the European Commission has moved to an approach based on linking their aid to poverty reduction results”, EC Budget Support: An Innovative Approach to Conditionality.

Country Sector Outcome indicator

Burkina Faso ABRP 2005-08

Health % children vaccinated

Mozambique PRBSP III 2006-07

Education % completion rate – girls

Tanzania PRBS III 2006-08

Education % primary school enrolment

Page 9: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

9

EC expectations for outcome-based conditionality

- Encourage a focus on results by using indicators of

service delivery / poverty reduction;

- Protect the political space for governments to determine

policy;

- Streamline conditionality;

- Promote domestic accountability;

- Stimulate demand for quality data on poverty.

Page 10: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

10

Policy and results: logics compared

Policy actions in programmes Outcomes in programmes

World Bank Burkina Faso PRSC 7:

- Alignment to international market price

- Contracts with professional operators to manage water systems

Tanzania PRSC 5: -Reform of business activities registration

Burkina Faso PRSC 7:

- SOFITEX operating profit at $US Million (>0)

- Access to drinking water %

Tanzania PRSC 5:

- Ranking on “Doing Business”

European Commission

No policy conditions are used to spell out the actions that the government should undertake to achieve a particular outcome

Mozambique PRBSP III:

- Primary school enrolment rate

- Completion rate

- Proportion of institutional deliveries among expected births

Page 11: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

11

What has been the impact of outcome-based conditionality?

Positive effects:

- Outcome-based conditionality has pushed a results based approach;- It has managed to streamline conditions;

But real concerns remain on attribution, predictability, etc.

Can further potential be unleashed? - Improve process (including CSO participation) - Improve indicators (including choice of)- Improve collection and disclosure of data - Revise technical complexities and mechanistic approach

Page 12: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

12

How to put governments in the driver’s seat – and yet feel safe

Guiding principles to resolve the conditionality – ownership paradox:

- Conditionality should be only applied in cases where none of key stakeholders could reasonably object to;

- Agreed standards and obligations should aim at increasing national leadership and policy space;

- Mutual accountability has the potential of framing donor-recipient relationships in ways that could yield much better results.

Page 13: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

13

Recommendations for donors to Accra and Doha

1. Agree on policies to eliminate economic policy conditions;

2. Put pressure on the Bank and the Fund to streamline their conditionality and phase out economic policy conditions1. Set a target in the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the

IMF and WB conditionality reviews2. Set up an independent monitoring system to objectively assess

progress made by the World Bank in the application of the GPPs

3. De-link their allocation and disbursement decisions from the IMF macro-economic assessments

4. Limit their conditions strictly to due process obligations and respect for internationally recognised standards and development goals.

Page 14: Conditionality VS Ownership: A resolvable paradox? Cairo, 19 January 2008.

14

By Nuria Molina-Gallart

EURODAD

[email protected]

www.eurodad.org