Top Banner
Concrete 99 Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999 Sydney May 1999 Arch Structures - Spanning Past Present and Future Doug Jenkins Reinforced Earth Engineering Manager
62

Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Jan 07, 2016

Download

Documents

Yan

Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999. Arch Structures - Spanning Past Present and Future Doug Jenkins Reinforced Earth Engineering Manager. The Sydney Opera House and Harbour Bridge. Gladesville Bridge. Why Arches?. Arches are efficient in use of materials. Arch behaviour is now well understood. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Concrete 99Concrete 99Sydney May 1999Sydney May 1999

Arch Structures - Spanning Past Present and Future

Doug Jenkins

Reinforced Earth

Engineering Manager

Page 2: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

The Sydney Opera House The Sydney Opera House and Harbour Bridgeand Harbour Bridge

Page 3: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Gladesville BridgeGladesville Bridge

Page 4: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Why Arches?Why Arches?

Page 5: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 6: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 7: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Arches are efficient in use of Arches are efficient in use of materialsmaterials

Page 8: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Arch behaviour is now well understoodArch behaviour is now well understood

0 5 10 15 20 25

-40

-20

0

20

40

Fill Height; m

Rel

ativ

e C

row

n D

ispl

acem

ent;

DY

Actual

Standard

Non-Lin

Elastic SS

Non Lin SS

Kouchi ExpresswayRelative Crown Displacement; DY

Page 9: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Arches are now economical to constructArches are now economical to construct

Page 10: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Early Arch BridgesEarly Arch Bridges

Page 11: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

The Landscape Arch, UtahThe Landscape Arch, Utah

Page 12: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 13: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 14: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

The Industrial RevolutionThe Industrial Revolution

Page 15: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 16: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Telfords Proposal for London BridgeTelfords Proposal for London Bridge

Page 17: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 18: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 19: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 20: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 21: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Theories of Arch DesignTheories of Arch Design

Page 22: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Robert Hooke, 1676:Robert Hooke, 1676:

"The true mathematical and mechanical form of all manner of arches for building, with the true butment necessary to each of them. A problem which no architectonick writer hath ever yet attemted, much less performed”

"As hangs the flexible line, so but inverted will stand the rigid arch."

Page 23: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-40 -20 0 20 40

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

Page 24: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-40 -20 0 20 40

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

Page 25: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

David Gregory:David Gregory:

"When an arch of any other figure is supported, it is because in its thickness some catenaria is included"

Page 26: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-40 -20 0 20 40

0

10

20

30

40

50

Parabolic arch enclosing a catenaryParabolic arch enclosing a catenary

Page 27: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 28: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 29: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

An old photograph of Pontypridd BridgeAn old photograph of Pontypridd Bridge

Page 30: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

An-Ji BridgeAn-Ji Bridge

Page 31: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 32: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 33: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 34: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

The Blackfriars CommitteeThe Blackfriars Committee

Eight “gentlemen of the most approved knowledge in building geometry and mechanics”– A clergyman– The Astronomer Royal– A Teacher of medicine– A lawyer– Two professors

Page 35: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Samuel JohnsonSamuel Johnson "If the elliptical arch be equally strong

with the semicircular, that is, if an arch, by approaching to a straight line, looses none of its stability, it will follow that all arcuation is useless…

But if a straight line will bear no weight, which is evident to the first view, it is plain like wise that an ellipsis will bear very little, and that as an arch is more curved its strength is increased."

Page 36: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

““Publicus” (believed to be Robert Publicus” (believed to be Robert Mylne himself)Mylne himself)

"…so that, if I understand it right, all from the haunches of the arch downward becomes a pier or abutment, to support a small part of the arch in the middle as a segment of a circle.

This middle part, if built like other arches would make a lateral pressure against these abutments, but to take that away he has placed cubical stones, which he calls joggles, in the joints of the arch; so that every stone tends to fall perpendicularly by its being carried along with the one above it, and nor shoved aside as in other arches, which is the cause of the lateral pressure."

Page 37: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 38: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 39: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-10 -5 0 5 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

Funicular

Circular

Parabolic

Funicular CurveComparison with circular and parabolic

Fill Height Over Crown = 1000.0m

K =0.00

Page 40: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-10 -5 0 5 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

Funicular

Circular

Parabolic

Funicular CurveComparison with circular and parabolic

Fill Height Over Crown = 1.0m

K =0.00

Page 41: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-10 -5 0 5 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

Funicular

Circular

Parabolic

Funicular CurveComparison with circular and parabolic

Fill Height Over Crown = 1000.0m

K =1.00

Page 42: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-10 -5 0 5 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

Funicular

Circular

Parabolic

Funicular CurveComparison with circular and parabolic

Fill Height Over Crown = 1.0m

K =1.00

Page 43: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-10 -5 0 5 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

Funicular

Circular

Parabolic

Funicular CurveComparison with circular and parabolic

Fill Height Over Crown = 1000.0m

K =0.50

Page 44: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-10 -5 0 5 10

0

2

4

6

8

10

Funicular

Circular

Parabolic

Funicular CurveComparison with circular and parabolic

Fill Height Over Crown = 1.5m

K =0.50

Page 45: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

-20 -10 0 10 20

-100

0

100

200

Distance From Crow n, m

Mom

ent,

kNm

Circular - Final Circular - Max Circular - Min

Funicular - Final Funicular - Max Funicular - Min

Moments on Buried ArchCircular and Funicular Curves

Page 46: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

The Twentieth CenturyThe Twentieth Century

Page 47: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

A Monier Arch BridgeA Monier Arch Bridge

Page 48: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Grafton Road Bridge, AucklandGrafton Road Bridge, Auckland

Page 49: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Salginatobel BridgeSalginatobel Bridge

Page 50: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 51: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 52: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Floating Formwork for Plougastel BridgeFloating Formwork for Plougastel Bridge

Page 53: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 54: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Today and the FutureToday and the Future

Page 55: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 56: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 57: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 58: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 59: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999
Page 60: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Shin Hamadera Bridge, JapanShin Hamadera Bridge, Japan

Page 61: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999

Properties of the ideal arch materialProperties of the ideal arch material

High compressive strength at comparatively low cost.

The ability to form any desired shape cheaply and accurately.

Erection without elaborate formwork. Low maintenance and excellent durability,

particularly under compression.

Page 62: Concrete 99 Sydney May 1999