O/H E 23.69 PAD PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING ASPHALT ROAD EXISTING FENCE EXISTING BUILDING PROPERTY BOUNDARY LEGEND EXISTING CONTOURS EXISTING FENCE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRICITY EXISTING SURVEY POINT LOCATION EXISTING SURVEY POINT I.D. EXISTING SURVEY POINT ELEVATION EXISTING SANITARY PIPE EXISTING STORM PIPE EXISTING WATER MAIN 770 770 U/G E EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICITY STORM SAN SAN PROPOSED BUILDING C EXISTING UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATIONS STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM M STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STOR STORM S ORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM STORM S STORM STORM STORM S SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN CEDAR ROAD SITE ENTRANCE SCALE CONC PAD SCALE DITCH SWALE IN ASPHALT O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E O/H E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E OFFICE 23.57 CN 3769 23.87 HTP TR 23.62 HTP 3TR 2UG 23.47 HTP 22.34 ANC 23.41 ELEC JB 23.59 WV 23.57 WV 23.57 WV 23.56 WV 23.55 WV 23.53 WV 24.47 FH 23.41 DCO RCB RCB 23.88 LS 23.61 WM 24.57 WATER TAP 24.01 LS SIG 24.03 LS SIG SEP LID SEP LID 23.67 WM BC 23.69 CL NOPOST 23.69 CL NOPOST 23.68 CL NOPOST 23.67 PAD 23.66 PAD PAD 23.68 PAD 23.67 PAD 23.69 23.69 ECONC 23.69 PAD 23.69 PAD 23.66 PAD 23.66 PAD 23.67 PAD 24.01 CN 3772 23.68 23.94 PAD 23.65 PAD PAD PAD 24.02 OCM 24.00 23.96 23.68 23.69 23.68 ECONC BC SMH 24.04 PAD PAD 24.06 PAD 24.05 PAD PAD PAD 23.67 PAD PAD 22.92 DL 23.13 DL 23.12 DL 23.19 DL 23.22 DL 23.27 DL DL 23.37 DL 23.44 DL 23.49 DL 23.53 23.59 HTP 2UG 25.22 ANC RCB 24.36 HWALL 24.31 HWALL 24.31 HWALL 24.36 HWALL 23.41 DL 23.94 DL 24.71 DL 25.19 DL 24.65 DL 23.96 DL 23.50 DL 24.19 TD 24.70 TD 25.01 TD 25.44 TD 25.73 PAD 25.67 PAD 24.43 AGS BL 24.14 AGS BL 23.62 AGS BL 23.57 AGS BL 23.68 23.65 23.68 CONC. PAD CONC. PAD CONC. PAD CONC. PAD SCALE HOUSE TEMPORARY SCALE AND SCALE HOUSE CONTRACTORY MAY USE THIS AREA FOR LAYDOWN YARD C C C C C C U/G E U/G E U/G E U/G E FENCE LINE TO BE REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION MAINTAIN BYPASS LANE (file: R422000197001FIG01.dwg) DATE JOB NO. FIGURE NO. MAY 2017 1 4-2200-01-97 THE REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NANAIMO SCALE AND SCALE HOUSE REPLACEMENT NANAIMO REGIONAL LANDFILL EXISTING CONDITIONS 0 20m 1 : 400 10
12
Embed
CONC.PAD SCALE HOUSE CONC - Homepage | RDN€¦ · pad conc. pad scale house desk storage / counter coffee / refrigerator / storage desk electrical panel wheelchair accessible washroom
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
April 7, 2017 3233-004 Via email: [email protected] Regional District of Nanaimo 6300 Hammond Bay Road Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N2 Attn: Maggie Warren, Superintendent Scale and Transfer Service
Re: Scale House Relocation on Existing Weigh Scale Slab
Dear Maggie: As requested, Herold Engineering Limited (HEL) visited the Cedar Landfill site on March 31st to review the configuration of the slab supporting the existing scale house. We have reviewed the Scale Building Drawings produced by UMA in 1991 versus the configuration that was built and would comment as follows:
The drawing shows the extent of the supporting slab to end at the edge of the existing scale building. However onsite, the slab appears to carry on past the west end of the scale house.
It is understood that a larger scale building of similar construction to the existing is to be constructed on this extended portion of the slab and that confirmation that the slab is adequate for this purpose is required.
A slab of similar construction to that shown on the drawing is adequate to carry the proposed building.
Note that it is highly likely that the slab is adequate to support the proposed configuration however, to verify this HEL would recommend a test hole be dug at the end of the slab (as indicated in the attached photograph) to confirm that the foundation does extend down as indicated on the drawing. During the time that the test hole is reviewed, HEL will use our in-house pachometer to review the reinforcing in the slab.
Should you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours truly, HEROLD ENGINEERING LIMITED Lee Rowley, P.Eng.,M.I.Struct.E.,M.I.C.E., LEED AP Principal
Enclosure
Maggie Warren, Superintendent Scale and Transfer Service Page 2 of 2 April 7, 2017 3233-004