Top Banner
concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how to measure non-specific binding (displacement) 5.can we do displacement in humans? maybe… 6.qualitative imaging vs quantitative imaging 7.“tracer” vs “drug” … vs “transmitter” 8.how to create a kinetic (compartmental) model for a PET tracer 9.what is a compartment? 10.what is a mass-balance? Conservation of mass (not conservation of radioactivity; not conservation of concentration…) 11.what do we measure with PET? But what quantity do we need to model? 12.why arterial sampling (need input function) 13.are all parameters estimatable? consider y = m*n*x + b 14.what are simulations good for? 15.binding potential – what does it represent? 16.Binding potential may be an equilibrium measure, but do we need to reach equilibrium to measure it? (how ‘bout your adult height?) 17.drug occupancy – how do we measure it with PET? 18.how did Farde do it? What assumptions did he make? Do you accept them?
22

Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

concepts for discussion

1.synopses – don’t overdo it2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde?

3.non-specific vs specific binding4.how to measure non-specific binding (displacement)5.can we do displacement in humans? maybe…6.qualitative imaging vs quantitative imaging7.“tracer” vs “drug” … vs “transmitter”8.how to create a kinetic (compartmental) model for a PET tracer9.what is a compartment?10.what is a mass-balance? Conservation of mass (not conservation of radioactivity; not conservation of concentration…)11.what do we measure with PET? But what quantity do we need to model?12.why arterial sampling (need input function)13.are all parameters estimatable? consider y = m*n*x + b

14.what are simulations good for?

15.binding potential – what does it represent?16.Binding potential may be an equilibrium measure, but do we need to reach equilibrium to measure it? (how ‘bout your adult height?)17.drug occupancy – how do we measure it with PET?18.how did Farde do it? What assumptions did he make? Do you accept them?

Page 2: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

ENAS 880 – Sept 13, 2011

Page 3: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

Recall from last time…Tracer in each state has a unique temporal trajectory

Time (minutes)

trac

er c

onc

entr

atio

n

Plasma

Free

Bound

What the PET scanner sees

which is which ?early late

striatum

cerebellum

Page 4: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

why is most of the brain blue?

are these “early” or “late” images?

is this structural or functional?

is this a ‘detection’ or a ‘characterization’ experiment?

Fowler et al., Science & Practice Perspectives, April 2007, 4-16

Page 5: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

t (B+F)/F B/F

0.81.83.4

‘late’ or ‘early’ image?

whose brain is this?

why a CT scan first?

why increasing contrast w/ time?

why increasing noise w/time?

what is the point of excess cold spiperone?

what do we learn from it re the caudate?

can we compare these numbers across scans?

why divide by cerebellum value?

could we do this exp’t in a human?

Page 6: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

Main points/questions/criticisms – Wagner et al.

1. so who really did the “first in vivo scan” of DA receptors in a primate?

2. how did this get into Science (and not Mintun)?

3. can we assume that cerebellum is exactly the same as the ‘free’ in the

striatum?

4. whose brain was it?

Page 7: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

First PET Image Of D2 Receptors in Brain

Page 8: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

First PET Image Of D2 Receptors in Brain

Page 9: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

•where do error bars come from?•(if so) is the Y axis correct?•where does “specific putamen” come from – special brain area known only in Sweden?

•what is plotted? (B vs F) – how did they get these values?•how did they get 5 data points•what is the slope near origin?•what is the assymptotic value for Y axis?

where does “expected spec binding” come from?

Is this a safe comparison? what factors are ignored?

understand this?got equilibrium?

Page 10: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

raclo in cereb (assume = free) --> plug into Bmax*Free/[Kd + Free] using Bmax and Kd from Healthy controls --> predicts B at equilib for schizo patients. Compare to actual B measured for patients (via [striat-cereb] per injected dose – I hope)

first ‘drug occupancy’ study with PET?

receptor occup = B/B (fractional change in binding due to presence of bound drug) = (Bpredicted – Bactual)/Bpredicted

claim: uniformity of occupancy of D2 by different drugs suggests that occupancy level is related to efficacy.

Page 11: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.
Page 12: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

What’s all this about models in PET?

Bound raclopride

Free raclopride

Plasma raclopride

‘stuck’ raclopride

Dopaminergic synapse

Page 13: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

The modeling process

(b)

P F B

N

(c)

... )( )(

...( )(

... )()()(

5

'max

21

tFkdt

tdN

Bkdt

tdB

tFktPKdt

tdF

on

(d)

(a)

Imagine a living brain

Consider the relevant neurochemistry

Abstract the neurochemistry into a series of connected pools

Describe exchange between pools by a series of differential equations

Morris, E.D., C.J. Endres, K. Schmidt, B.T. Christian, R.F. Muzic, R.E. Fisher. Kinetic Modeling in PET. In Emission Tomography: The Fundamentals of PET and SPECT, ed. M. Wernick and N. Aarsvold. Academic Press. Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2004, pp. 499-540.

Page 14: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

P F B

typically written as…

what’s all this about?

what is ?

conservation of mass

under what condition?what is the blue? what is the fraction of P that is blue – according to Mintun? according to us?

Mintun: can’t estimate

Bmax and rate constants

from high spec act

expm’t

Page 15: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

parameter estimation – what is it? why is it iterative?

simulations? what are they good for? what are they used for here?

sensitivity analysis – huh?

kon*Bmax = Bmax

koff KD

BP is an equilibrium ratio (has no units of time or rates) but we can get it from a TRANSIENT experiment.

Page 16: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

anything tricky about using an in vitro sample for anatomy?

what’s the difference between expt 1 and expt 2 in same baboon?

why didn’t they estimate BP in 2nd study?

Page 17: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.
Page 18: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

Schematic Diagram of Ligand Binding

“Rest” condition

endogenous NT unlabeled tracer radiolabeled tracer

BP = B/F at steady state

Page 19: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

Schematic Diagram of Ligand Binding

“Rest” condition

endogenous NT unlabeled tracer radiolabeled tracer

loss of receptors

BP ↓

Page 20: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

Schematic Diagram of Ligand Binding

DA-release condition

endogenous NT unlabeled tracer radiolabeled tracer

DA ↑

BP ↓

Page 21: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

BP is the (fractional) difference in BP between conditions

BP= (BP1-BP2)/BP1

Page 22: Concepts for discussion 1.synopses – don’t overdo it 2.how comfortable were you with Wagner paper, Mintun, Farde? 3.non-specific vs specific binding 4.how.

terms for next week: Sept 20

displacement

release

endogenous

simulation

what is Logan proving by her simulations? where they get their parameter vals

what things might be causing DA release in Koepp expt? what might have been a better control condition(s)? what do (+) changes in binding potential (Fig 2) mean?

what is the ‘proof’ that DA release is being measured?

what is being optimized in Morris paper? where do they get their parameter vals?