COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF MATERIALS: THREE HIERARCHICAL LEVELS 10 -9 10 -6 10 -3 NUM ERICAL M ETHODS Processm odelfor bulk/sheetforming relationsin polycrystallinem aterials FEM Eshelby m ethod M onteCarlom ethod Molecularstatics M oleculardynam ics M onteCarlom ethod FD M Phasetransform ation 10 0 M acroscopic (Structural) M esoscopic (Grainlevel) M icroscopic (N anoscopic) (Atom iclevel) L e n g t h s c a l e s , m SCA LE THEORY CO M PU TA TIO N A L ISSU ES A PPLICA TIO N Continuum Mechanics Therm odynam ics (Constitutive equation) FEM R epresentativevolum e elem entconcept Quantum m echanics Interatom icpotentials Visualization Large scale com puting *A daptiveauto-rem eshing M assivelyparallelcomputing *Dom aindecom position *D atastructureforparallel adaptive solution Integration ofvariouscodes Com putationtim e Lim itedbynum berofgrains Lim ited bytim e(ps)and space (10 4 -10 6 atom s) ParallelM olecularDynam ics (PM D ,codedeveloped at Sandia,LosA lam s,A m es) Self-consistentmethod M icrostructureevolution Com posite m echanics Defects(e.g.dislocation, grain boundary) Grain boundarysliding Crack-tip evolution Structuraldesign Structure-property relations Hom ogenizationm ethods
22
Embed
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF MATERIALS: THREE HIERARCHICAL LEVELS
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF MATERIALS: THREE HIERARCHICAL LEVELS. Embedded Atom Method Energy Functions (D.J.Oh and R.A.Johnson, 1989 , Atomic Simulation of Materials, Edts:V Vitek and D.J.Srolovitz,p 233 ). The total internal energy of the crystal. where. and. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF MATERIALS: THREE HIERARCHICAL LEVELS
10-9
10-6
10-3
NUMERICALMETHODS
Process model forbulk/sheet forming
relations inpoly crystalline materialsFEM
Eshelby methodMonte Carlo method
Molecular staticsMolecular dynamicsMonte Carlo method
Interatomic Potentials, Ei(We use EAM potential for Al)
Specify Xio, T, Specify atomic positionsof all atoms Xio
Positions of all atoms(including defects)
Positions of all atomsat T,
Ei(Xi)
Xi
=0Ei(Xi)
XiFi
=
Atomistic Simulation Method
Embedded Atom Method Energy Functions(D.J.Oh and R.A.Johnson, 1989 ,Atomic Simulation of Materials, Edts:V Vitek and D.J.Srolovitz,p 233Edts:V Vitek and D.J.Srolovitz,p 233)
The total internal energy of the crystal
12
1
1
tot ii
i i ijj
i ijj
E E
E F r
f r
where
and
Internal energy associated with atom i
Embedded Energy of atom i. Contribution to electron density of ith atom and jth atom. Two body central potential between ith atom and jth atom.
iF
ijf r
ij
iE
n
e e
me e
m
F a b
f r
Embedded energy is of the form
where
and e cr r
0
/ 1 / 10
/ /
( ) ( ) ( ), and ( ) ( )
where
( ) , and ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) / ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) / ( )
1
e e
e c e
old c r ld c
r r r rold e ld e
c old c old c c
c old c old c c
r r r r
f r f r f r r r
f r f e r e
f r f r g r f r g r
r r g r r g r
g r e
are equilibrium and cut off interatomic separations
The constants required in the above equation are listed for Al, Cu and Mg atoms below
Al Cu Mg
5 5 6
10.5 8.5 10.5
20 20 20
rc 1.9 1.9 1.7
e 0.12538 0.36952 0.14720
a -4.8144 -4.0956 -1.1049
b 0.47685 -1.6979 -1.3122
e 12.793 12.793 12.316
GRAIN STRUCTURE AND COMPUTATIONAL CRYSTAL
CONSTRUCTION OF COMPUTATIONAL CRYSTAL
CONSTRUCTION OF COMPUTATIONAL CRYSTALCONSTRUCTION OF COMPUTATIONAL CRYSTAL
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR GB SLIDING
"PURE" GBS PROCESS AND AND ENERGY
COUPLED GBS AND MIGRATION
3 GB Sliding and Migration at 500K (Applied Shear)
Note: At Same loading and simulation time (5ps)
GB SLIDING MEASUREMENT
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 0
-6 0
-5 0
-4 0 -30 -2 0
-1 0
0 10 20 30 40 5 0 60
D istance from gra in bo u nd ary , an gstro m
3 (11 1)_
5 p s
4 p s
3 p s
2 p s
1 .5 p s
0 .5 ps
GB ENERGY AND SURFAC ENERGY
GB (CSL) 3
(112)
9
(221)
9
(114)
11
(113)
33
(332)
43
(225)GB plane(hkl)--------
Egb
Egbmax
hkl
(111) (335)
3 11
0.024 2.03 2.69 2.18 0.91 2.59 2.34 2.62
6.88 8.01 7.90 8.58 9.16 7.56 8.21 7.79
2.45 5.99 6.27 5.46 6.03 5.71 6.64 3.66
All energies are in unit of eV/A2 x10-2
Egb : Equilibrium Grain Boundary Energy
Egbmax : Maxium Grain Boundary Energy During 'Pure' GBS
2hkl : Surface Energy of two Grain Boundary Palnes
Conclusion Since maxium grain boundary energy during GBS (Egbmax)
is less than surface energy of the grain boundary palne (2hkl), GBS ismore favorable than the formation of voids.
GB Energy vs. Misorientation angle
(
111)
(
112)
(
221)
1
4)
(113
)
(334
)
(331
)(
552)
(225
)
(443
)
(556
)
(551
)
(441
)
(332
)
(335
)
(a)
0
1
2
3
4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Our Calculation
Experimental Result
0
1
2
3
0 20 40 60 80 120 140 160 180
100
(b)
(
111)
(113
)
(
112)
Egb
,eV
/A2
Egb
,eV
/A2
MAGNESIUM EFFECT ON GB ENERGY OF Al
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
with Mg
without Mg
3
Mg location from the grain boundary plane
Egb
,eV
/A2
Egb
,eV
/A2
2.65
2.7
2.75
2.8
2.85
2.9
2.95
3
3.05
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
without Mg
with Mg9
Mg location from the grain boundary plane
y
Mg
Al
GB
Energy distribution at grain boundaries
-3.6
-3.56
-3.52
-3.48
-3.44
-10 -5 0 5 10
-3.6
-3.56
-3.52
-3.48
-3.44
-10 -5 0 5 10
-3.6
-3.56
-3.52
-3.48
-3.44
-10 -5 0 5 10
-3.6
-3.56
-3.52
-3.48
-3.44
-10 -5 0 5 10-3.6
-3.56
-3.52
-3.48
-3.44
-10 -5 0 5 10
-3.6
-3.56
-3.52
-3.48
-3.44
-10 -5 0 5 10
3 5
9 11
27 57
Distance from grain boundary (A)
Ene
rgy
perat
om(e
V)
oDistance from grain boundary (A)
o
Distance from grain boundary (A)o
Distance from grain boundary (A)o
Distance from grain boundary (A)o
Distance from grain boundary (A)o
Ene
rgy
perat
om(e
V)
Ene
rgy
perat
om(e
V)
Ene
rgy
perat
om(e
V)
Ene
rgy
perat
om(e
V)
Ene
rgy
perat
om(e
V)
MAGNESIUM EFFECT ON GB Al-3
0 ps 1.5 ps
2 ps 5 ps
1
2
R
1
2
R
1
2
R
1
2
R
Al
Mg
Applied shear stress: 0.02 eV/A2Note:
Energy distribution in equilibrium structure of tilt grain boundary
-3.7
-3.65
-3.6
-3.55
-3.5
-3.45
-3.4
-3.35
-25 -15 -5 5 15 25
Distance from grain boundary
Egb,
eV
pure Al
Al5%Cu
Al5% Mg
Energy distribution in presence of Mg atoms
-3.6
-3.55
-3.5
-3.45
-3.4
-3.35
-25 -15 -5 5 15 25
Distance from grain boundary
Egb,
eV
pure Al
Al1%Mg
Al2%Mg
Al4%Mg
Al5% Mg
Energy distribution in presence of Cu atoms
-3.66
-3.64
-3.62
-3.6
-3.58
-3.56
-3.54
-25 -15 -5 5 15 25
Distance from grain boundary
Egb,
eV
pure Al
Al1%Cu
Al2%Cu
Al4%Cu
Al5%Cu
Energy variation of a atom whrn Mg atoms distributed with in 10 atomic layers across