Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources for e + /e - Linear Colliders A. Vivoli* Thanks to : A. Variola, R. Chehab, T. Omori, F. Zimmermann, E. Bulyak, M. Kuriki, * E-mail : [email protected]
Jan 22, 2016
Compton Based Polarized Positron
Sources for e+/e- Linear Colliders
A. Vivoli*
Thanks to : A. Variola, R. Chehab, T. Omori, F. Zimmermann, E. Bulyak, M. Kuriki,
* E-mail : [email protected]
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
2
CONTENTS
• Introduction to Pol. e+ Sources• Simulation Results• Different Schemes for Compton
Sources• Possible application to CLIC• Conclusions
MOTIVATION
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
3
For next e-e+ colliders polarization of both e- and e+ would be very useful.(G. Moortgat-Pick et al., Physics Reports 460 (2008) 131-243 )
General Scheme of P.P.S.
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
4
(Polarized) e+ are not available in nature!
Positron Source:
• Primary e- beam generation• Generation of Gamma rays (Ondulator, Compton, …)• Pair production in a target (W, Ti, Liquid Pb, …)• Capture of e+ • Acceleration and Transport• Stacking in a Damping Ring
Target
Compton Backscattering
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
5
’
Linear Compton Backscattering
• ’ ≈ /(42) Optimum Energy for e+ production and capture: E ≈ 30 MeV≈m E ≈ 42hc/≈MeV ≈ 2500 Ee- ≈ 1.3 GeV
• , r02 = 6.66 ·10-25 cm2
e-
Ee-= mec2
A
NNfN
e
3
8
Compton e+ Sources
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
6
• Compton Ring + Stacking Cavity• ERL + Stacking Cavity(T. Omori, J. Urakava, M. Kuriki – KEK)(A. Variola, F. Zomer, R. Chehab – LAL) (E. Bulyak, P. Gladkikh – NSC KIPT)
• Linac + CO2 laser NO NEED STACKING(V. Yakimenko, I.V. Pogorelsky - BNL)
NEED STACKING IN DR
• Proof-of-principle demonstration: T. Omori et al., PRL 96 (2006) 114801
Very interesting, not treated here.
Stacking Cavity
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
7
Laser power = W Cavity length = LLaser frequency = flaser Energy gain = G
flaser ≈ Elaser= W/ flaser ·Gc
L2
W
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
8
By T. Omori
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
9
By T. Omori
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
10
Polarized Positron Source
e- injector +Bunch Compressor
Compton cavities
e-
ERL Scheme
e-
e+
Target
Capture Section with solenoid(+ Bunch Compressor)Up to ~150 (200) MeV
4.8 (2.2) GeVsuperconducting linac
with quadrupole focusing
(PRE)Damping Ring
e+
1.8 GeV superconducting linac
e-
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
11
Gamma Production Scheme (by T. Omori)
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
12
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
13
Simulation (CAIN)
Mean Energy : 27,7 MeV Number of photons simulated : 75177 105
Photons 1.8 GeV – 5 IP
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
14
COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ENRGY SCHEMES
1.3 GeV – 5 IP 1.3 GeV – 10 IP 1.8 GeV – 5 IP
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
15
Positron Production (EGS)
• Number of e+ : 6470 105
• Mean energy : 17.627 MeV• Polarization : 21%
1.8 GeV – 5 IP
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
16
5 - 10 Interaction points
e-
e+ (180 - 200 MeV)
1.3 – 1.8 GeV ERL
e-
Target
AMD
e-
79 Cavities
e-
e- source
Scheme of the Capture Section (up to 180 MeV)
Dump Solenoid
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
17
Adiabatic Matching Device
• Length: L = 50 cm• Magnetic field at the
target : B0 = 6 T
• Magnetic field at the end : B(L) = 0.5 T
• Magnetic Field Behaviour :
zz
1
B)B(
0
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
18
N. e+
105
x (rms) p
mm mrad
y (rms)
p mm mrad
<E> MeV
E
MeV
z (rms) mm
5499 1807 2444 19.35 11.69 0.31
2866 434 433 20.15 11.08 7.9
Beam parameters
Z = 0
Z = 50
Parameters of the positron beam at the exit of the target (z = 0 cm) and at the exit of the AMD (z = 50 cm)
Capture percentage : 52,12 %
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
19
Captured Positron Beam
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
20
New Cavity (1.3 GHz, SW, 100 KW CW)
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
21
Pre-accelerator
Solenoid • Magnetic Field = 0.5 T• Length = ~ 57 mAccelerating Cavities:• Length = 56 cm• Aperture = 2. cm• Average accelerating
Field = ~ 3.3 MV/m • Number of cavities = 79Drift length between
cavities = 13 cm
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
22
N. e+
105
x (rms)
mm mrad
y (rms)
mm mrad
<E> MeV
E
MeV
z (rms) mm
z (rms)
mm mrad
2866 434 433 20.15 11.08 7.9 7.29
1591 20 19 164.39 24.24 10.76 9.65
Beam parameters II
Z = 50
Z = 5775
Parameters of the positron beam at the exit of the AMD (z = 50 cm) and at the exit of the solenoid (z = 5775 cm)
Multiple stacking needed
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
23
Energy (GeV) Yield e+/ (%) Pol (%)
1.0 0.9 48
1.3 1.7 48
1.5 2.3 33
1.8 4.0 27
COMPARISON OF YIELD & POLARIZATION FOR DIFFERNET Ee-
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
24
Capture Section (+ CHICANE)
From Compton Cavities
To the accelerator
Target
Adiabatic MatchingDevice Pre-accelerator
Chicane
e-
e+
Solenoid Cavities
BendingMagnets
Drift = 8 - 10 cm
Magnetic field
Electric field
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
25
Bending angle = 16 deg drift length = 200 cm BM length = 60 cm
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
26
N. e+
105
x (rms) p
mm mrad
y (rms)
p mm mrad
<E> MeV
E
MeV
z (rms) mm
z (rms)
cm MeV
1591 20 19 164.39 24.24 10.76 9.65
701 17 15 180.02 6.79 16.24 2.44
Beam parameters II
Z = 5775
Z = 6540
Parameters of the positron beam at the exit of the solenoid (z = 5775 cm) and at the exit of the chicane (z = 6540 cm)
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
27
CASE N. Yield
e+/ %
N. e+ z
cm MeV
x
mm mrad
y
mm mrad
E
MeV
z
cm
1.3/10 A
1.06 1010 0.31 3.26 107 1.86 19 21 4.14 1.93
1.3/10 A
1.06 1010 0.28 3.00 107 1.73 19 21 3.88 1.83
1.3/10 A
1.06 1010 0.25 2.62 107 1.58 19 20 3.42 1.64
1.3/5 0.67 1010 0.36 2.39 107 1.53 15 17 3.55 1.67
1.8/5 0.75 1010 0.88 6.65 107 2.15 19 19 5.60 1.85
RESULTS (180 MeV)
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
28
Capture Section (+ B.C.)
From Compton Cavities
To the accelerator
Target
Adiabatic MatchingDevice Pre-accelerator Bunch Compressor
e-
e+
Solenoid Cavities
BendingMagnets
Drifts
Magnetic field
Electric field
Chicane
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
29
e+
DriftsBending MagnetsTriplets
Bunch Compressor
Tesla Cavities
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
30
N. e+
105
x (rms) p
mm mrad
y (rms)
p mm mrad
<E> MeV
E
MeV
z (rms) mm
z (rms)
cm MeV
701 17 15 180.02 6.79 16.24 2.44
701 19 16 177.08 9.03 3.05 2.62
Beam parameters III
Z = 6540
Z = 7961
Parameters of the positron beam at the exit of the chicane (z = 6540 cm) and at the exit of the BC (z = 7961 cm)
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
5 GeV superconducting LINAC
Quadrupoles length : L = 10 – 20 cmField at pole tip : B = 3 – 5 KGQuadrupoles aperture : R = 5 cm Cavities length : l = 1.25 mMean accelerating field : E = 9 MV/mCavities aperture : r = 3.5 cm
31
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
32
N. e+
105
x (rms) p
mm mrad
y (rms)
p mm mrad
<E> MeV
E
MeV
z (rms) mm
z (rms)
cm MeV
701 19 16 177.08 9.03 3.05 2.62
681 1.48 0.80 5074 31.70 3.04 9.59
Beam parameters IVParameters of the positron beam at the exit of the BC (z = 7961 cm) and at the exit of LINAC (z ~ 105 cm)
Yield e+/ = 0.9 %
Z= 7961
Z~ 105
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
33
PolarizationEstimations of polarization are made assuming that the initial polarization of the positrons doesn’t change. P = 60.3 %
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
34
STACKING SIMULATIONS
By F. ZIMMERMANN
frep = 40.8 MHz : 1st turn of DR stacking
(1) 1st turn begin
(2) 1st turn end e+ bunches from ERL
6.15 ns
24.6 ns
e+ bunches from ERL
24.6 ns 6.15 ns
DR
DR
By T. Omori
04/21/23 35A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
(b) frep = 40.8 MHz : 2nd turn of DR stacking
(1) 2nd turn begin
(2) 2nd turn end
e+ bunches from ERL
24.6 ns 6.15 ns
e+ bunches from ERL
6.15 ns
24.6 ns
DR
DR
By T. Omori
04/21/23 36A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
(b) frep = 40.8 MHz : 3rd turn of DR stacking
(1) 3rd turn begin
(2) 3rd turn end
e+ bunches from ERL
24.6 ns 6.15 ns
e+ bunches from ERL
6.15 ns
24.6 ns
DR
DR
By T. Omori
04/21/23 37A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
(b) frep = 40.8 MHz : 4th turn of DR stacking
(1) 4th turn begin
(2) 4th turn end
e+ bunches from ERL
24.6 ns 6.15 ns
e+ bunches from ERL
6.15 ns
24.6 ns
DR
DR
By T. Omori
04/21/23 38A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
(b) frep = 40.8 MHz : 5th turn of DR stacking
(1) 5th turn begin
(2) 5th turn end
e+ bunches from ERL
24.6 ns 6.15 ns
e+ bunches from ERL
6.15 ns
24.6 ns
DR
DR
By T. Omori
04/21/23 39A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
ILC-DR Snowmass ‘05 proposal
ILC 2008 – Compton “CR-B”
ILC 2008 – Compton “CERL-B”
CLIC pre-DR 2007 (NLC 2004 )
CLIC 2008 (& CLIC CERL Compton vers.)
beam energy 5 GeV 5 GeV 1.98 GeV 2.424 GeVcircumference 3223 m 6695 m 230.93 m 251.6 mparticles per extracted bunch 2.4x1010 2.0x1010 4.0x109 4.5x109
rf frequency 650 MHz 650 MHz 2 GHz 2 GHzharmonic number 6983 14516 1540 1677no. trains stored in the ring 10 (10/pulse) 52.5 (52.5/pulse) 4 (1/pulse) 1#bunches/train 280 50 312 312bunch spacing 4.202 ns 6.15 ns 0.5 ns 0.5 nsgap between trains 80 (336 ns) ~50 ns 73 (36.5 ns) 682.7 ns#e+ / injection 2.4x108 6.65x107 6.65x107 6.65x107 6.65x107
#turns btw inj. in 1 bucket 1 2 5 40 40injections/bucket per cycle 10 30 1020 (cont.) 3 80 (cont.)injection frequency ~240 MHz 80 MHz 32 MHz ~50 MHz 50 MHzfull cycle length 200 ms 200 ms 200 ms 80 ms 20 mstime between inj. periods 10 ms 10 ms - 1.9 ms -#turns between cycles 930 450 (5155) 2470 (20647)length of one inj.period 0.107 ms 1.34 ms 114 ms 0.046 ms 2.6837 msTI=total # injections/bucket 100 300 1020 60 80ST=store time after last inj. 109 ms 97 ms 86 ms 42 ms 17.3163 msIP=interval with inj. periods 91 ms 103 ms (114 ms) 38 ms (2.6837 ms)energy loss/turn 5.5 MeV 8.7x2 MeV 8.7x2 MeV 0.803 MeV 1.63MeV
(4.08 MeV)longitudinal damping time || 10 ms 6.4 ms 6.4 ms 2 ms 1.25 ms (0.5 ms)
Compton source megatable - 1
04/21/23 40A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
Compton source megatable - 2
ILC-DR Snowmass ‘05 proposal
ILC 2008- Compton “CR-B”
ILC 2008- Compton vers. “CERL-B”
CLIC pre-DR 2007 (NLC 2004)
CLIC 2008 (& CLIC CERL Compton vers.)
transv. normalized edge emittance at inj. (10x rms)
0.05 rad-m 0.063 rad-m 0.063 rad-m 0.063 rad-m
transv. normalized dynamic aperture (Ax+Ay)gamma
>>0.05 rad-m?
0.4 rad-m 0.2 rad-m 0.2 rad-m?
rms bunch length at injection 3 mm 9 mm 11.4 mm 3.8 mm 11.4 mmrms energy spread at injection 0.14% 0.06%(3MeV) 0.04% 0.28% 0.08% [2 MeV]final rms bunch length 6 mm 5.2 mm 5.12 mm 0.79 mm (0.47 mm)final rms energy spread 0.14% 0.091 % 0.089% 0.095% (0.12%)longit. “edge” emittance at inj. 0.7 meV-s 0.72 meV-s 0.72 meV-s 0.73 meV-srf voltage 20 MV 36 MV 1.72 MV 2 MV (16.3 MV)momentum compaction 3x10-4 4.2x10-4 1.69x10-3 9x10-5
2nd order mom. Compact. 1.3x10-3 - - 5.8x10-2 (3x10-4)synchrotron tune 0.0356 0.084 0.0188 0.0045 (0.0127)bucket area 292 meV-s 129 meV-s 10 meV-s 12meVs (234meVs)ICM=bckt area/edge emit. / 133 57 4 (102)RMIN=TI/ICM 0.75 18 15 (0.59)IP/RMIN/|| 12 1 1.3 (9.1)IP/RACT/|| 0.09 0.15 0.31 (0.09)synchronous phase 15.58o 28.97o 26.47o (14.49o)separatrix phases 1&2 164.42 o, -
159.19 o
151.03 o, -82.64 o 153.53 o, -95.66 o
(165.51 o, -163.83 o)
max. momentum acceptance +/-2.7% +/- 1.6% +/- 1.0% +/-1.6% (+/- 13%)injection offset ,z ramped in ramped in d +1.5%,0.01m ramped in (+13.20%, 0 m)simulated stacking efficiency 82% ~95% ~94% not comp. 95.5%final # positrons / bunch 2x1010 1.94x1010 6x1010 not comp. 5.1x109
Design of the Energy Compressor
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
42
Tesla Cavities
…..
Chicanes
Quadrupoles
Beam ellipse in the longitudinal phase space (z,E)
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
43
FINAL RESULTS
04/21/23 44
Compton Ring (CR) vs Compton Energy Recovery Linac (C-ERL)
Unit CR C-ERL
Energy e- GeV 1.0 - 1.3 1.3 – 1.8
Bunch length (rms)
ps 10 - 20 ~ 1
Operation mode Burst ‘Almost’ CW
Bunch Charge
nC 5 - 10 0.5 – 1.6
A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
REQUIREMENTS
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
45
• ILC
Ne+ = 2·1010 x 2625 = 5.25·1013 e+ /pulse tpulse ~ 22 s fr= 5 Hz 2.625·1014 e+/s
Polarization : Min 30% Possibly ≥ 60%
• CLIC
Ne+ = 4·109 x 312 = 1.248·1012 e+/pulse tpulse = 156 ns fr= 50 Hz 6.24·1013 e+/s
Polarization : Min 30% Possibly ≥ 60%
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
46
ILC - CRBy T. Omori, A. Variola et al.
100 bunchesT b_b = 18.45 ns
C=553 m
1.3 GeV Linac
GammaNg = 4 10exp10 bunch
2 10exp 8 positrons
CW linac3.5 GeV
564 bunchesTb_b =6.15ns
C=1040mTcool = 2 msecwait = 2 msec
single cycle ~2.5 msec
CW linac1.5 GeV
Stack 40 times416 microsec
Transfer at 400 HzIt means that in 100 msec => 40 shotsTotal 320 stackings/bunch in main-DR
Collision 226 turns (416micro sec) then wait 2 msec.Single cycle ~ 2.5 m sec.
To DR
Waiting timeBetween stackIn the same bucket= 1/200 Tcool
Compton Ring Scheme for ILC• Compton scattering of e- beam stored in storage ring off
laser stored in Optical Cavity.• 5.3 nC 1.8 GeV electron bunches x 5 of 600mJ stored
laser -> 2.3E+10 γ rays -> 2.0E+8 e+.
• By stacking 100 bunches on a same bucket in DR,
2.0E+10 e+/bunch is obtained.
Electron Storage Ring 1.8 GeV 1.8 GeV booster
04/21/23 48A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
49
ILC – C ERLBy T. Omori, A. Variola et al.
ERL scheme for ILC• High yield + high repetition in ERL solution.
– 0.48 nC 1.8 GeV bunches x 5 of 600 mJ laser, repeated by 54 MHz -> 2.5E+9 γ-rays -> 2E+7 e+.
– Continuous stacking the e+ bunches on a same bucket in DR during 100ms, the final intensity is 2E+10 e+.
SC Linac 1.8 GeV
Laser Optical Cavities
PhotonConversi
onTarget
CaptureSystem
To PositronLiniac
RF Gun
Dump
1000 times of stacking in a same bunch
04/21/23 50A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
51
CLIC - CRBy L. Rinolfi, E. Bulyak, P. Gladkikh
E. Bulyak, P.Gladkikh/ NSC KIPT
Compton ring design
Number of e- = 312 x 6.2 x 1010 = 1.93 x1013 in the ring1 cycle = 15 000 turns = > T = 156 ns x 15 000 = 2.3 ms C ≈ 47 mLaser on during 2500 turnsPhoton yield = 85 photons / e-
04/21/23 52A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
Pre-injector Linac for e+
200 MeV
Inje
ctor
Lin
ac
2.2
GeV
e+ DR
2.424 GeV
2 GHz
2.424 GeV
Drive Linac
1.06 GeV
Compton ring
e+ PDR and Accumulator
ring
2 GHz50 Hz
CLIC Compton scheme
Compton configuration for
polarized e+
RF
gun
1 YAG Laser pulse
2 G
Hz
Stacking cavity
20 turns makes 312 bunches with 4.4x109 e+/bunch
C = 47 m, 156 ns/turn, 312 bunches with 6.2x1010 e-/bunch
e+ 2.6x108 pol. /turn/bunch
(10-20 MeV) 2.1x109 /turn/bunch
600 mJ
L. Rinolfi
04/21/23 53A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
54
CLIC – C ERLBy F. ZIMMERMANN
2008CLIC e+Comptonscheme-example
04/21/23 55A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
Conclusions
A Compton based Polarized Positron Source with stacking cavity scheme could fulfill the requirement of ILC (more difficult) and CLIC (easier), but improvements are necessary in :
• Laser technology (power/repetition rate) • Optical cavity technology (energy gain/repetition rate)• Capture section efficiency (higher yield, smaller
emittance, polarization)• Stacking (relaxation of too strict assumptions)
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
56
04/21/23 A. Vivoli, Compton Based Polarized Positron Sources
57
THANKS.
The EndThe End