Top Banner
Compromises and the national move towards Civil War
18

Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Feb 23, 2016

Download

Documents

Jala Jala

Compromises and the national move towards Civil War. The Shaky Union. 1) The South feared that the North would take control of CONGRESS and SOUTHERNERS began to proclaim states’ rights as a means of self-protection. 2) The North believed that the nation was a UNION and could not be divided. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Page 2: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

The Shaky Union1) The South feared that the North would take

control of CONGRESS and SOUTHERNERS began to proclaim states’ rights as a means of self-protection.

2) The North believed that the nation was a UNION and could not be divided.

3) While the Civil War did not begin as a war to abolish SLAVERY, issues surrounding slavery deeply divided the NATION.

Page 3: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Issues that Divided the Nation

1) An important issue separating the country related to the power of the FEDERAL government.

2) Southerners felt that they had the power to declare any national law ILLEGAL (nullification). Northerners believed that the national government’s power was SUPREME over that of the states.

3) Southerners felt that the abolition of SLAVERY would destroy their region’s economy. Northerners believed that slavery should be abolished for MORAL reasons.

Page 4: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Compromise of 1850

• Created in reaction to new lands gained from Mexican-American War

• Missouri Compromise is inadequate now that U.S. geography has changed

Page 5: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

1850 Compromise AgreementNorth Gets: South Gets:

California admitted as a free state

No slavery restrictions in Utah or New Mexico territories

Slave trade prohibited in Washington D.C.

Slaveholding permitted in Washington D.C.

Texas loses boundary dispute with New Mexico

Texas gets $10 million

Fugitive Slave Law

Page 6: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War
Page 7: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Fugitive Slave Laws (1850)• 1. No jury trials for

blacks• 2. Slaves cannot

testify against masters• 3. Federal

commissioners handled all cases – $5 if slaves are freed by

the ruling– $10 if ruling in favor of

claimant (master)

Page 8: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

The Underground Railroad

• “Escape” Route from South for runaway slaves

Page 9: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852)

• Written by Harriet Beecher Stowe

• Personalized Slavery• Sold 3 million

copies• Banned in the South

– “Book of Lies”

Page 10: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854)

• Authorized the creation of Kansas and Nebraska

• Abolished the Mason-Dixon Line (Missouri Compromise)

• Supported Popular Sovereignty

Page 11: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Compromises Attempting to Resolve Differences

1) Missouri Compromise (1820): Missouri entered the Union as a SLAVE state. Maine entered the Union as a FREE state.

2) Compromise of 1850: California entered the Union as a FREE state. Southwest territories would DECIDE about slavery (popular sovereignty).

3) Kansas-Nebraska Act: People in each state would decided the SLAVERY issue (popular sovereignty)

Page 12: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Senator David Atchison

*Leads 5,000 pro slavery Missourians into Kansas

*Attempts to swing slavery vote

*Kansas = slave state

Page 13: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Bleeding Kansas (1856)

• Pro-slavery Missourians (in Kansas) attack Lawrence, KS (anti-slavery city)

• Lawrence is burned, 200 die in total

Page 14: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

John Brown"These men are all talk. What we need is action—action!"

Page 15: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Brooks-Sumner Incident

• Sen. Charles Sumner (MA) gives anti-slavery speech in the Senate

• Insults Sen. Andrew Butler (SC)• Butler’s nephew, Rep. Preston Brooks (SC)

felt his family was insulted• Beats Sumner unconscious with his cane

Page 16: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Dred Scott Case (1857)

• Upheld slavery– Dred Scott sues for his freedom

• Roger B. Taney (Chief Justice) Rules:– Slaves cannot sue– Slaves are not citizens– Slaves are property– Consequence = Slavery cannot be stopped

Page 17: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Final ruling in Dred Scott Case: Missouri Compromise declared

unconstitutional (Congress could not ban slavery from any state)

Chief Justice Taney

Page 18: Compromises and the national move towards Civil War

Reaction

• Harper’s Ferry, WV – John Brown leads 21 abolitionists on a raid

• Raids a federal arsenal – hopes to arm southern slaves to lead rebellion

• Hoped to establish a base to conduct raids from the Blue Ridge Mountains

• Captured, executed for treason• Became a martyr for the cause