This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Assessing the Equivalence of Conventional Drugs Containing Complex APIs: Developing Defensible Statistical Analyses and Acceptance CriteriaAjaz S. Hussain | Insight Advice & Solutions LLC
Symposium: Improved Statistical Approaches for Comparability/Equivalence Assessments of Biosimilars and Complex DrugsAAPS Annual Meeting 2015 | 27 October 2015, Orlando, Florida
• For the kind invitation and for suggesting the title of this talk• Assessing the Equivalence of Conventional Drugs Containing Complex APIs:
Developing Defensible Statistical Analyses and Acceptance Criteria
• This talk focuses on ‘defensible’ and is, in part, a reflection – a decade ago –when I had, among others, the responsibility for the Sandoz’s development portfolio of biosimilar and complex generic products
• This talk builds on the experience gained during development of generic enoxaparin – which was done in collaboration with Momenta Pharmaceuticals
• Acknowledging Prof. Ram Sasisekharan (MIT) and Dr. Ganesh Venkataraman Kaundinya (Momenta)
• The assessment of equivalence between two drug products containing complex active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and the assessment of comparability as part of the demonstration of biosimilarity, share the common goal of comparing two or more large multivariate data sets comprising measurements obtained using a wide variety of different analytical technologies. Historically, such comparisons have been mostly univariate in nature, comparing results from one type of measurement at a time. Although simpler technically, this univariate approach tends to ignore much of the information content inherent in these large data sets. Increasingly, multivariate approaches have been considered to maximize the useful information derived from these rich data sets. This session will highlight the similarities and differences between the statistical approaches used for the equivalence comparisons of complex “small molecule” products and those used for the comparability assessments of biosimilars, with an emphasis on cutting edge multivariate methods, and as illustrated with case studies.
Defensible Statistical Analyses and Acceptance Criteria?
Scientific
Morally defensible
Legally defensibleComplicated
[Simple]
Complex
Emerging practices
Good practices (CGMPs)
[Best practices]
Process understanding
Control strategy
Reducing uncertainty & complexity (in variability)
An epistemological rethink is needed to instigate a paradigm shift from the traditional Pharmaceutical Equivalence interpretation that has dominated the pharmaceutical sector, to an appraisal of complexity that includes both holism and reductionism… (adapted from Fulvio Mazzocchi 2008)
Continued scientific scrutiny; as expected For example:
Mourier, Pierre AJ, et al. "Analytical and statistical comparability of generic enoxaparins from the US market with the originator product." Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis 115 (2015): 431-442.
Results were compared by statistical approaches using multivariate analysis with a partial least squares discriminant analysis methodology. The variations were statistically significant and allowed a clear distinction to be made between the enoxaparin batches according to their manufacturer.
Continued scientific scrutiny; as expected For example:
Guerrini, Marco, et al. "Differentiation of Generic Enoxaparins Marketed in the United States by Employing NMR and Multivariate Analysis." Analytical chemistry 87.16 (2015): 8275-8283.
Chemometric analysis of the NMR spectra, utilizing both 1H and 1H–13C HSQC NMR experiments, of Lovenox and Enoxaparin, the latter being the generic version of the former, revealed that Lovenox and the four Enoxaparin compounds produced by Sandoz (Enoxaparin and Fibrinox), Winthrop, and Amphastar exhibit dissimilarities in terms of their composition. All of the collected samples had expiry dates between 2012 and 2015.
Building consensus slow/difficult — Stakeholders need conclusions— Regulator heterogeneity — Scientific scrutiny is open-ended— Need to defend ANDA approvals — Uncertainty expected to increase— Complexity often underestimated
Complex Generics: Enoxaparin— A major development — Recognition & emphasis on PE— Scientific scrutiny; as expected— Totality of evidence concept— Biosimilar review paradigm— OGD/OPQ open to discuss science— Analytical characterization— Process understanding— Life-cycle approach to PV— Continued process verification — Integrated CMC - CGMP
generics are for minor but not serious illnesses;… and poor people are forced to ‘settle’ for generics.
What do people really think of generic medicines? A systematic review and critical appraisal of literature on stakeholder perceptions of generic drugs. BMC Medicine 2015, 13:173
36 % of the patients reported negative experiences after medication substitution
89 % of pharmacists reported receiving patient complaints regarding use of generic medicine, although 64 % suggested that this was due to a nocebo effect
Only 50.2 % of the surveyed pharmacists agreed that all products that were approved as generic equivalents can be considered therapeutically equivalent.
Just 6 % of pharmacists considered that dry powder inhalers were interchangeable.
While acceptance of generic medications is improving, substantial mistrust and lack of confidence remains, particularly within the patient and, to a lesser extent, physician groups.
Nearly half the patients stated they would refuse generic substitution when it became available if this was just to save the health authority money.
Generic medicines were considered to be poor quality and treated with suspicion.
Ajaz S. Hussain | Insight Advice & Solutions LLC 1510/27/2015
“Society and medicine treat us all as members of populations, whereas as individuals we are all unique, and population statistics do not apply.” Craig Venter