Page 1
1
Complement 5a Enhances Hepatic Metastases of Colon Cancer via Monocyte Chemoattractant
Protein-1-Mediated Inflammatory Cell Infiltration
Chunmei Piao1,2, Lun Cai1, Shulan Qiu1, Lixin Jia1, Wenchao Song1, Jie Du1,2
1Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to the Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China; 2The Key Laboratory of Remodeling-Related Cardiovascular Diseases, Capital Medical University,
Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing 100029,
China;
*Running title: C5a promotes metastasis by inflammatory cell infiltration
1To whom correspondence should be addressed: Jie Du, Ph. D, Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel
Diseases, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China. Phone:
+86-10-6445-6030; Fax: +86-10-6445-6095; E-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: Complement 5a; macrophages; metastasis; tumor microenvironment, Monocyte
Chemoattractant Protein-1
Background: It is known that complement system
contributes to tumor progression, but exact mechanism is
still unclear.
Results: Complement 5a enhances tumor metastasis via
monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mediated
inflammatory cells infiltration.
Conclusion: Complement 5a plays a pro-metastasis role
by establishing inflammatory microenvironment required
for tumor metastasis.
Significance: Our results provide a therapeutic insight for
complement in treatment of malignant tumors.
ABSTRACT
Complement 5a (C5a), a potent immune
mediator generated by complement activation,
promotes tumor growth; however, its role in
tumor metastasis remains unclear. We
demonstrate that C5a contributes to tumor
metastases by modulating tumor inflammation
in hepatic metastases of colon cancer. Colon
cancer cell lines release C5a under serum-free
conditions and C5a levels increase over time in
a murine syngeneic colon cancer hepatic
metastasis model. Furthermore, in the absence
of C5a receptor or upon pharmacological
inhibition of C5a production with an anti-C5
monoclonal antibody, tumor metastasis is
severely impaired. A lack of C5a receptor in
colon cancer metastatic foci reduces the
infiltration of macrophages, neutrophils, and
dendritic cells, and the role for C5a receptor on
these cells were further verified by bone
marrow transplantation experiments.
Moreover, C5a signaling increases the
expression of the chemokine monocyte
http://www.jbc.org/cgi/doi/10.1074/jbc.M114.612622The latest version is at JBC Papers in Press. Published on March 4, 2015 as Manuscript M114.612622
Copyright 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 2
2
chemoattractant protein-1(MCP-1) and the
anti-inflammatory molecules arginase-1,
interleukin 10, and transforming growth factor
beta, but is inversely correlated with the
expression of pro-inflammatory molecules,
which suggests a mechanism for the role of C5a
in the inflammatory microenvironment
required for tumor metastasis. Our results
indicate a new and potentially promising
therapeutic application of complement C5a
inhibitor for the treatment of malignant
tumors.
Malignant tumors are characterized by their
ability to metastasize. Increasing evidence shows
that the development of a supportive
microenvironment in solid tumors plays a critical
role in tumor metastasis(1). In the tumor
microenvironment, inflammatory cells and
molecules influence almost every aspect of cancer
progression, including the tumor cells’ ability to
metastasize(2). Inflammatory immune cells
constitute a substantial proportion of the cells
within the tumor microenvironment and are
associated with tumor malignancy in patients and
animal models of cancer(3). It is clear that the
immune system is a major contributor to
pathogenesis, although the mechanisms of tumor
metastasis are not fully understood. Therefore, a
better understanding of the underlying
immune-mediated pathways involved in tumor
metastasis may identify new targets that could be
manipulated pharmacologically or biologically to
halt disease progression.
As a central contributor to the innate
immune response, complement plays a major role
as a first defense against harmful molecules and
microbes that are unwanted by the host (4-6).
Anaphylatoxins (Complement 3a (C3a),
Complement 4a (C4a), and Complement 5a
(C5a)) are a group of small peptides generated by
complement activation that play important roles
in innate immunity through the initiation and
regulation of inflammatory responses (7,8).
Complement activation contributes to cancer
progression, and complement deposition is
observed in different tumor types (9-11).
However, the function of C5a in tumor metastasis
is controversial(12). In some studies complement
shows an active and beneficial role in the fight
against malignant cells, and
complement-dependent cytotoxicity synergizes
with tumor-directed antibody therapy in tumor
treatment (13,14). Markiewski et al(15)
demonstrated that C5a in the tumor
microenvironment leads to significant tumor
progression in a mouse model of cervical cancer,
which is mediated, in part, by the recruitment of
myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs).
Furthermore, lung cancer cells can produce
complement C5a, and blocking C5a by
antagonist inhibited tumor growth (16). These
findings suggest that C5a contributes to tumor
growth in the immunosuppressive
microenvironment. Complement activation may
also be linked to angiogenesis. In human colon
cancer, the immune response strongly influences
tumor metastasis(17), and elevated complement
levels in hepatic metastases are observed in colon
cancer patients (18). Sixty percent of patients
with colon cancer develop liver metastasis, which
is responsible for a large percentage of colon
cancer-related deaths (19,20). However, the
function of C5a in hepatic metastasis of
colorectal cancer has not been elucidated.
Therefore, we sought to demonstrate C5a
function with emphasis on the tumor
microenvironment.
In this context, we hypothesized that
complement activation may contribute to the
generation of an inflammatory microenvironment
that favors colon cancer metastasis. Our results
demonstrate that C5a is released and promotes a
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 3
3
pro-tumor environment through a mechanism
that involves increased inflammatory infiltration,
the production of monocyte chemoattractant
protein-1 (MCP-1) and a reduction in the levels
of immune-modulators. These results provide
new information about the relationship between
complement activation and tumor metastasis,
which could influence the development of future
therapeutic strategies.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Antibodies and reagents-The antibody
against Ki-67, PCNA were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); the anti-
bodies against F4/80, C5a receptor, and Ly6G
were from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA); and
ChemMate TM EnVision System/DAB Detection
Kits were from Dako (Glostrup, Denmark). The
following antibodies were from Biolegend (San
Diego, CA, USA): PerCP/Cy5.5-conjugated
CD45.2, phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated F4/80,
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated
F4/80, FITC-conjugated CD206, FITC-conjugated
CD4, FITC-conjugated CD8, and isotype controls.
Anti-mouse C5 monoclonal antibody (BB5.1) and
the irrelevant IgG control of the same isotype
(MOPC) which are a widely used C5 blocking
antibody and control antibody had been previously
demonstrated for its effectiveness were used as
described previously (21-23). Protein kinase B
(also known as Akt) inhibitor MK-2206 was from
Selleck Chemicals (Huston, TX, USA).
Recombinant mouse C5a was from R&D Systems
(Minneapolis, MN, USA). Mouse C3a and C5a
ELISA Kits were from KeYingMei Technology
Co. Ltd (KYM, Beijing, China).
Cell culture- SL4 colon carcinoma cells were
maintained in DMEM/F12 culture medium as
described(24), HCT116 human colorectal carcinoma
cells and SW480 human colon adenocarcinoma cells
were maintained in IMDM, CT26 mouse colon cancer
cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium. Cultures
were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)
and 100 units/mL each penicillin and streptomycin and
grown under a 5% CO2 at 37°C. All cell lines were
obtained from the American Type Culture Collection
(Rockville, MD, USA).
Animals-C5aR-/- mice, backcrossed onto the
genetic background of C57BL/6 for more than 10
generations, were as described previously (14).
Mice were 8-12 weeks old at the beginning of the
experiments and were matched for age and sex
with wild-type (WT) mice. All mice were housed
under specific pathogen-free conditions at the
Beijing Anzhen Hospital, which is affiliated with
the Capital Medical University, China. All animal
care and experimental protocols complied with the
Animal Management Rule of the Ministry of
Health, People’s Republic of China
(Documentation no. 55, 2001) and the Guide for
the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published
by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH
Publication no. 85-23, revised 1996) and were
approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use
and Committee of the Capital Medical University.
Tumor model and administration of anti-C5
mAbs-SL4 colon carcinoma cells were derived
from C57BL/6 mice on the same background as
the C5aR-/- and WT control mice,as described
previously(25). SL4 colon carcinoma cells were
maintained in DMEM/F12 culture medium,
supplemented with 10% FBS in a humidified 37oC
incubator under 5% CO2. For the in vivo hepatic
metastasis model, after anaesthetizing mice, a
transverse incision in the left flank was made,
exposing the spleen, and then 5×105 SL4 tumor
cells in 100 μL DMEM/F12 medium were
intrasplenically injected using a 26-gauge needle.
Hepatic ultrasonography was performed on mice
at day 14 after SL4 injection using a 15-mHz
probe for adults and the VEVO 770 software
package (Visual Sonics). Fourteen days after
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 4
4
inoculation, mice were sacrificed, and the tissues
were processed as described below. The spleen
and liver were removed, wet spleen and liver
weights were measured, and the incidence of
hepatic metastases was examined. The neutralizing
monoclonal anti-C5 antibody BB5.1 or isotype
control mouse IgG1, MOPC-31C (all at a dose of
1 mg/mouse) administrated as described
previously (23).
Histology and immunohistochemistry-
Paraffin Serial sections of 5 μm thick were
obtained for histologic analysis, and stained with
Hematoxylin&eosin (HE) by standard procedures
(26). Paraffin sections were incubated with the
primary antibody against Ki-67, (1:200) at 4 oC
overnight and then incubated with the Dako
Chem-Mate™ EnVision System (Dako, Glostrup,
Denmark) for 30 min. Images were viewed and
captured using a Nikon Labophot 2 microscope
equipped with a Sony CCD-IRIS/RGB color video
camera attached to a computerized imaging system
and analyzed by Image Pro Plus 3.0. The
expression of Ki67 was calculated as the
proportion of positive area to total tissue area for
all measurements of the sections, using Aperio
(Vista, CA, USA) Full Automatic Digital Slide
Scanning System(27).
Frozen tumor sections (7 μm) and cell slides
were incubated with the primary antibodies against
F4/80 (1:100), C5aR (1:200), or Ly6G (1:200), at
4 oC overnight and then with FITC- or tetra-
methylrhodamine isothiocyanate–conjugated
secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch
Laboratories) at room temperature for 1 hr.
Sections were viewed with a confocal laser
scanning microscope (TCS 4D; Leica, Heidelberg,
Germany) and a Nikon Labophot 2 microscope
equipped with a Sony CCD-IRIS/RGB color video
camera(28).
SL4 sh-C5 cells selection- SL4 cells were
transfected with a plasmid expressing C5 shRNA
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (CA, USA) to
downregulate C5, and puromycin (1μg/ml) were
used for screening the stably transfected cell
colonies. Reduction in C5 was confirmed by
Real-time PCR with primers for C5 shown in
table1.
Apoptosis analysis- The apoptosis of
formalin-fixed liver sections from WT or C5aR-/-
mice after SL4 cells inoculation, was analyzed by
the TdT-mediated dUTP Nick-End Labeling
(TUNEL) technique from Promega (Madison, WI,
USA).
Macrophage and neutrophil Extraction,
Culture and Treatment-Treated mice were injected
with 1.5 ml of 3.85% thiogycollate 3–5 days
before macrophage isolation, 3-4 hours before
neutrophil isolation. Peritoneal macrophages and
neutrophils were obtained by lavaging the
peritoneal cavity with 5 ml of 10 mM
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells underwent
hemocytometry and plating in 6-well plates at
3×106 cells per well, then culture in DMEM
containing 10% fetal bovine serum. After 4 hrs,
non-adherent cells were removed by changing the
medium (29). For recombinant C5a treatment,
cells were washed with PBS and incubated with
recombinant C5a (10 nM) for 6 hrs.
Flow cytometry-For staining of immune
markers, single-cell suspensions were prepared by
mechanical dispersion and enzymatic digestion of
tumor tissues. Briefly, tumor tissues were cut into
multiple small cubes and digested in an enzyme
mixture containing collagenase type I (0.05
mg/mL) and type IV (0.05 mg/mL), hyaluronidase
(0.025 mg/mL), DNase I (0.01 mg/mL), and
soybean trypsin inhibitor (0.01 mg/mL) for 45 min
at 37 oC. The cell suspension was centrifuged and
preincubated with fragment crystallizable-γ
blocking antibody (anti-mouse CD16/32;
PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA) to prevent
nonspecific binding. Cell staining involved
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 5
5
different combinations of fluorochrome-coupled
antibodies to CD45.2, F4/80, CD206, and CD8 for
30 min at 4℃ in the dark. Fluorescence data were
collected using an EPICS XL Flow Cytometer
(Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), and analyzed
using CellQuest. A fluorescence-negative control
was included to determine the level of nonspecific
staining and autofluorescence associated with
subsets of cells in each fluorescence channel (30).
Bone Marrow Transplantation-Bone marrow
was harvested from 6- to 8-week-old WT and
C5aR KO mice by flushing the femurs and tibias
with 2% FBS in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
Cells (2×106) were intravenously injected through
the tail vein of lethally irradiated (10 Gy) recipient
mice. Tumor cell implantation was performed by
intrasplenic injection 8 weeks later.
Real-time PCR-Total ventricular RNA was
extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. PCR amplification was
performed using the iQ5 Real-Time PCR
Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA)
with SYBR Green JumpStartTM Taq
ReadyMixTM (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan) and
primers for mouse, MCP-1, Macrophage
Inflammatory Proteins 1 alpha (MIP-1α),
Macrophage Inflammatory Proteins 1 beta
(MIP-1β), Macrophage Inflammatory Proteins 1
gamma (MIP-1γ), Regulated on activation, normal
T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES),
Arginase 1, interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β), interleukin
6 (IL-6), interleukin 10 (IL-10), interleukin 12
(IL12)-p35, IL12-p40, interleukin 23 (IL23)-p19,
transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFβ1), and
Nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) (Table 1). Melting
curve analysis was performed at the end of each
PCR reaction. The housekeeping gene -Tubulin was used as control, and the expression of other
genes was expressed as a ratio to the expression of
-Tubulin.
Chemokine Analysis-To evaluate the
production of chemokines in macrophages and
neutrophils, mouse peritoneal macrophages and
neutrophils were plated at 1×105 per well in
24-well plates and cultured for 6 h. After
incubation, the media was collected and analyzed
using BD LSR Fortessa and FACSDiva software
and BD™ Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) kits (BD
Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) to measure
levels of the chemokine keratinocyte
chemoattractant (KC), MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β,
and RANTES.
Western blotting-Protein extracts were
diluted with loading buffer and separated by
electrophoresis on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels
before transfer to nitrocellulose membranes. The
membranes were blocked in Odyssey blocking
buffer (LI-COR Bioscience, Lincoln, NE) at
room temperature for 2 hr, then incubated at 4°C
overnight with primary antibodies: phosphor-p38,
p38, phosphor-Akt, Akt, phosphor-p42/44,
p42/44 or actin (1:1000) (Cell Signaling
Technology, MA, USA). The membranes were
washed and incubated with fluorescent secondary
antibodies (Alexa Fluor 680 or IRDye 800,
Rockland Immunochemicals, PA, US) for 1 hr at
room temperature at 1:5000; blots were analyzed
with the Odyssey infrared imaging system and
Odyssey software(31).
Invasion assay- BD bioCoat matrigel
invasion chamber (BD Biosciences, Bedford,
MA) assays were done in 24-well plates using
polyethylene terephthalate inserts (8-m pores)
with matrigel coating. In this assay, 2105 SL4 were seeded in the upper chamber in serum-free
media and 1 106 macrophage with 5% FBS in the bottom chamber. After 24 hr, noninvading
cells were removed from the upper membrane
surface of the insert using a cotton swab. The
invading cells on the lower membrane were
stained and counted (32).
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 6
6
Statistical analysis-Results are expressed as
mean ± SEM. Data analysis involved the use of
GraphPad software (GraphPad Prism version 5.00
for Windows). Comparison between groups was
analyzed by one-way ANOVA; p values < 0.05
were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Colon cancer cells produce C5a-The
complement system can recognize tumor cells, and
complement deposition is observed in different
types of tumors (9,15). Cells from some tumor
types under serum-free conditions will activate
and release C5a. To determine whether the colon
cancer cell line SL4 releases C5a, we cultured SL4
cells in serum free medium for 48h. Conditioned
medium was collected and C5a and C3a levels
were determined (Fig. 1A). C5a levels were
elevated whereas C3a levels remained constant.
C5a production in other mouse colon cancer cell
lines and in human colon cancer cells were also
high (Fig. 1B, 1C). To verify these results, we
employed the SL4 syngeneic metastasis model of
colon cancer in mice. In this model, metastatic foci
in the liver develop after intrasplenic injection of
colon cancer cells. Our results demonstrate that
levels of C5a in the plasma are increased at 10
days after intrasplenic injection of colon cancer
cells and remain high for at least two additional
weeks, to rule out a non-specific response to the
cell injection itself, injection with mouse NIH3T3
cells did not increase plasma C5a level in mice
(Fig. 1D). To demonstrate C5a originated from
SL4 cells has pro-metastatic effects, C5a was
downregulated by stable transfection of SL4 cells
with a plasmids expressing C5-shRNA,
downregulation of C5 in SL4 cells indeed reduced
tumor metastasis ability (Fig. 2A). These results
support a role for colon cancer cells in promoting
C5a production.
Disruption of host C5aR signaling inhibits
tumor metastasis of colon cancer-C5a acts on
specific receptors on various types of cells
resulting in downstream immunomodulatory
function. The receptor for C5a (C5aR) is normally
expressed on myeloid cells, although its detection
on non-myeloid cells has also been reported in the
literature (33). We hypothesized that C5aR
expression by phagocytes may contribute to the
process of tumor development. To investigate
whether the C5a-C5aR pathway is required for
tumor metastases, we blocked C5a generation in
tumor-bearing wild-type mice using an anti-mouse
C5 monoclonal antibody (mAb; BB5.1)
administered 1 day before the injection of tumor
cells. An irrelevant IgG of the same isotype
(MOPC) was used as a control (22).
Anti-C5-treated mice had impaired hepatic
metastases of colon cancer relative to mice treated
with control IgG (Fig. 2B). These results support
our hypothesis that C5a-C5aR signaling
contributes to the development of hepatic
metastasis by colon cancer cells.
We considered the possibility that the
contribution of C5aR to the metastasis of colon
cancer cells in our model could be explain by
signaling either through C5aR on the injected SL4
cells or through C5aR on host cells. To distinguish
these two possibilities and to further verify the role
of C5a-C5aR signaling in colon cancer metastasis,
we assessed tumor metastasis of SL4 cells injected
into mice deficient in C5aR. Hepatic metastases
from the C5aR-deficient mice had significantly
reduced size as compared to the WT controls (Fig.
3A). To determine if reduced formation of
metastatic liver foci in C5a-R background is due to
increased apoptosis, we examined apoptosis with
TUNEL staining at early time point (day1) after
same amount SL4 cell injection into spleen, there
was no difference in apoptosis in WT and C5aR-/-
(Fig. 3C). These results verify that C5a signaling
through C5aR is involved in colon cancer
metastasis, and also clarify that C5aR expressed
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 7
7
on host cells, rather than on the SL4 colon
carcinoma cells, is involved.
C5aR deficiency reduces macrophage and
neutrophil infiltration in metastatic foci in the
liver-In the tumor microenvironment,
inflammatory cells and molecules influence almost
every aspect of cancer progression, including the
tumor cells’ ability to metastasize(15,34). To
assess the mechanism of C5a in hepatic metastases
of colon cancer, we examined inflammatory cell
infiltration in tumors of WT and C5aR-/- mice.
Inflammatory cell infiltration in
collagenase-digested tumors was analyzed by flow
cytometry. We excluded PI+ nonviable cells, gated
on CD45+ population cells, and then compared the
relative proportion of helper T lymphocytes (CD4),
cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8), macrophages
(F4/80), neutrophils (Ly6G), and dendritic cells
(CD11c) in liver metastatic foci from C5aR-/- and
WT mice. As shown in Fig. 4A, the proportion of
infiltrating CD45+F4/80+ cells in liver metastatic
tumors was significantly reduced in
C5aR-deficient mice compared with WT mice.
Similarly, the proportion of infiltrating
CD45+Ly6G+ cells and CD45+CD11c+ cells in
liver metastatic tumors was significantly reduced
in C5aR-deficient mice compared with WT mice.
There were no significant differences in the
amount of CD4+ or CD8+ T lymphocytes
infiltrated into tumors in C5aR-deficient mice
compared with WT mice (data not shown). We
also assessed the inflammatory cells in the blood
of tumor-bearing mice and did not detect
significant differences in the inflammatory cells in
the blood (Fig. 4B). Thus, the inhibition of tumor
metastasis in C5aR-deficient mice is specifically
associated with reduced infiltration into the tumor
of neutrophils, monocytes and dendritic cells, all
of which are of myeloid origin(35).
To verify that the infiltrating cells express
C5aR, we performed double immunofluorescence
staining with antibodies against C5aR and F4/80,
Ly6G (Fig. 5). Overlap was observed between
C5aR and each of these myeloid markers, thus
confirming that the infiltrating myeloid cells
express C5aR.
Bone marrow-derived cells facilitate tumor
metastasis in C5aR deficient mice-Our results
suggest that C5aR affects the infiltration of
myeloid cells into metastatic foci in the liver,
which implies a bone marrow origin. To determine
whether cells of bone marrow origin contribute to
hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer, we
performed bone marrow(BM) transplantation and
created C5aR-chimeric mice(23). Two months
after BM transplantation, mice were inoculated
with SL4 colon cancer cells. As shown as Fig. 5,
the tumor size was dependent on the genotype of
the cells that were transplanted. Transplantation of
bone marrow from C5aR-deficient mice (KOBM)
conferred a reduced size of the hepatic metastases
of colorectal cancer as compared to bone marrow
from WT mice (WTBM) for irradiated recipient
mice of WT or C5aR-/- genotype Fig. 6. Thus,
these results verify that the inflammatory cells
infiltrating into the tumor originate from the bone
marrow, and that C5a facilitates their recruitment
to the tumor site.
Blockade of C5aR reduces MCP-1 release in
macrophage-We postulated that the strong
chemoattractant activity of C5a(36) may be
derived, in part, from the activation of chemokines.
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
(MCP-1)/CCL2 has potent monocyte chemotactic
activity and is responsible for the recruitment of
immunosuppressive macrophages that promote
tumor growth (37,38). Therefore, we determined
whether C5a regulates inflammatory cell
infiltration by promoting the expression of MCP-1
or other chemokines in hepatic metastatic foci of
colon cancer. The expression of MCP-1 mRNA
was markedly decreased in metastatic foci in
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 8
8
C5aR-deficient mice, though there were no
significant differences in the mRNA expression of
other chemokines tested (Fig. 7A). To further
support these findings, we assessed protein levels
by CBA assay for macrophages and neutrophils
isolated from mice. MCP-1 was highly expressed
in macrophages. The amount of MCP-1 was not
statistically different between WT and C5aR-/-
mice; however, the addition of 50 nM C5a to the
culture medium for 6 hours caused a statistical
increase in the levels of MCP-1, Macrophage
Inflammatory Proteins 1 alpha (MIP-1 and Macrophage Inflammatory Proteins 1 beta
(MIP-1 in WT cells but not in C5aR-/-
macrophages (Fig. 7B). To gain mechanistic
insights into a functional link between C5a/C5aR
mediated signaling and inflammatory molecules,
we examined C5a/C5aR mediated inflammatory
signaling, namely, Mitogen-activated protein
kinases (MAPK) and Phosphoinositide 3-kinase
(PI3K)-AKT(39), C5a/C5aR-activated AKT signal
increased the expression of inflammatory
molecules, which was blocked by Akt inhibition
(MK-2206) (Fig. 7C). These results suggest that
the levels of MCP-1 and other chemokines
produced by macrophages may be dependent on
C5a signaling through C5aR.
C5aR deficiency enhances the expression of
immune stimulatory genes and reduces metastases
ability-To assess the effect of C5aR in the immune
response to tumor metastasis; we evaluated the
expression of several immune-related molecules in
the tumor microenvironment. Total RNA was
extracted from metastatic foci of colon cancer in
the livers of C5aR-/- and WT mice. Real-time
PCR was performed for 8 immune associated
genes. The expression of anti-inflammatory NOS2
and IL-23 was significantly increased in the
metastatic foci of colon cancer in tumors of the
C5aR-deficient mice (Fig. 8A). Furthermore, the
expression of pro-inflammatory Arg1, TGF and
IL-10 was significantly decreased in
C5aR-deficient mice (Fig. 8B), while the
expression of IL-1 and IL-12 p40 and p35 was essentially unchanged. To establish a causal role
for C5a -stimulated chemokines from macrophage
in the liver metastasis of colon cancer cells, we
performed in vitro invasion assays using matrigel
-loaded transwell chambers. We found
C5a-stimulated WT macrophage increased SL4
cell invasion in vitro, compared with
non-stimulated WT macrophage, and importantly,
C5a failed to cause SL4 cell invasion when C5aR
was deficient in macrophage (Fig. 8C). These
results are consistent with a role for C5a in the
generation of an immunosuppressive tumor
microenvironment.
DISCUSSION
Tumor metastasis is a complex event that
requires interactions between tumor cells and the
surrounding stroma(40). Inflammatory cells and
molecules influence almost every aspect of this
process (2,41). Moreover, for colorectal cancer,
the prognosis is closely associated with the
presence of hepatic and other metastases(42). In
this study, we have demonstrated the contribution
of complement C5a to hepatic metastasis. We
demonstrated that colon cancer cell lines can
generate C5a and that C5a levels increase upon
tumor progression. C5aR deficiency in a murine
colon cancer model reduces hepatic metastasis, as
well as inflammatory cell infiltration.
Macrophage-derived MCP-1 and other cytokines
are decreased in C5aR-deficient mice, suggesting a
pathway for the associated levels of inflammatory
cells infiltration. Furthermore, using bone marrow
transplantation experiments we showed that bone
marrow derived inflammatory cells contribute to
tumor metastasis and that this contribution is
dependent on C5aR.
C5a is a potent pro-inflammatory mediator of
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 9
9
inflammation and infection and is widely
understood to be able to both promote and
exacerbate tumor growth for premalignant skin
lesions (15,16). Our demonstration of its role in
metastasis extends its function to advanced,
invasive tumors. Colorectal carcinomas are well
characterized with regard to the expression of
membrane-bound complement regulators (43-45).
We demonstrated that colorectal cancer cells
generate C5a in the absence of serum and that
injection of these cells into mice leads to C5a
production in metastatic tumors. Furthermore,
using a mouse model of tumor metastasis in which
we inoculated SL4 malignant cells intrasplenically
into mice, we showed that either antibody
neutralization of C5 and consequently C5a
production or C5aR deficiency leads to reduced
tumor metastasis. Our results showed that even
though loss of C5aR significantly reduced liver
metastasis but it does not completely abrogate
liver metastasis, this suggest that C5a-C5aR axis is
necessary but not sufficient for liver metastasis,
and other events such as senescence(46),
angiogenesis(47) are also required for liver
metastasis.
These experiments collectively suggest that
C5aR signaling promotes metastasis of SL4
tumors.
The enhanced infiltration of inflammatory
cells in C5aR-deficient mice suggests the
possibility the C5a has immunomodulatory
functions in tumor metastasis. Several studies with
animal experimental models, as well as studies in
humans, have demonstrated a crucial function for
inflammatory cells in tumor immunity (24,48,49).
Infiltration of leukocytes and macrophages are
molecular signatures linked to a poor prognosis in
cancer patients(50). Therefore, our findings that
C5aR-deficient mice display reduce infiltration of
macrophages and neutrophils in liver metastatic
tumors suggest that C5aR deficiency can delay
tumor metastasis by promoting
immunosurveillance function in the tumor
microenvironment. One of the important
mechanisms used by malignant tumors to suppress
the immune response to tumor antigens is
abnormal myelopoiesis, as well as the recruitment
of myelomonocytic cells to the tumor site and
peripheral lymphoid organs. In neoplasias,
macrophages and neutrophils are recruited into the
tumor from the peripheral circulation by
chemokines. Our observation that MCP-1
expression is increased in metastatic foci of colon
cancer in the liver provides a mechanism to
explain the reduced infiltration and is consistent
with previous work that demonstrates a direct
correlation between the expression of MCP-1 and
macrophage infiltration in human breast cancer
tissues(37).
We have demonstrated an
immunosuppressive capacity of C5a in our model.
Immunosuppression by complement C5a has also
been reported in a cervical cancer model(15), for
which the generation of C5a in the tumor
microenvironment enhances tumor growth by the
recruitment of MDSCs and the suppression of the
antitumor T cell-mediated response, including the
expression of key immunosuppressive molecules
within tumors(15). These results are in full
agreement with our studies. We found that the
expression of anti-inflammatory molecules ARG1,
IL-10, and TGF- was down-regulated; whereas the expression of the key pro-inflammatory
molecules NOS2 and IL-23 was up-regulated.
Furthermore we found macrophage stimulated
with C5a promote invasion ability of SL4 colon
cancer cells.
In conclusion, our results further support the
role of complement C5a in tumor metastasis.
Further studies are needed to extend our findings
to other metastatic models of cancers. The findings
reported here not only introduce a new
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 10
10
complement-mediated mechanism of
tumor-dependent immunosuppression, but also
provide preliminary evidence of the potential
utility of complement inhibition as a therapeutic
option in anticancer therapy. Given that
complement inhibition overrides tumor-dependent
immunosuppression, this therapeutic approach
may also hold promise as a supplement to
antitumor vaccines.
Reference
1. Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Sica, A., and Balkwill, F. (2008) Cancer-related inflammation. Nature 454,
436-444
2. Mantovani, A. (2009) Cancer: Inflaming metastasis. Nature 457, 36-37
3. de Visser, K. E., and Coussens, L. M. (2006) The inflammatory tumor microenvironment and its impact
on cancer development. Contrib Microbiol 13, 118-137
4. Benoit, M. E., Hernandez, M. X., Dinh, M. L., Benavente, F., Vasquez, O., and Tenner, A. J. C1q-induced
LRP1B and GPR6 proteins expressed early in Alzheimer disease mouse models, are essential for the
C1q-mediated protection against amyloid-beta neurotoxicity. J Biol Chem 288, 654-665
5. Ghebrehiwet, B., Hosszu, K. K., Valentino, A., Ji, Y., and Peerschke, E. I. Monocyte Expressed
Macromolecular C1 and C1q Receptors as Molecular Sensors of Danger: Implications in SLE. Front
Immunol 5, 278
6. Mueller-Ortiz, S. L., Morales, J. E., and Wetsel, R. A. The receptor for the complement C3a anaphylatoxin
(C3aR) provides host protection against Listeria monocytogenes-induced apoptosis. J Immunol 193,
1278-1289
7. Zhou, W. The new face of anaphylatoxins in immune regulation. Immunobiology 217, 225-234
8. Hu, H., Chen, D., Liu, Y., Deng, Y., Yang, S., Qiao, M., Zhao, J., and Zhao, X. (2006) Target ability and
therapy efficacy of immunoliposomes using a humanized antihepatoma disulfide-stabilized Fv fragment
on tumor cells. J Pharm Sci 95, 192-199
9. Bjorge, L., Hakulinen, J., Vintermyr, O. K., Jarva, H., Jensen, T. S., Iversen, O. E., and Meri, S. (2005)
Ascitic complement system in ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 92, 895-905
10. Niculescu, F., Rus, H. G., Retegan, M., and Vlaicu, R. (1992) Persistent complement activation on tumor
cells in breast cancer. Am J Pathol 140, 1039-1043
11. Peerschke, E. I., and Ghebrehiwet, B. cC1qR/CR and gC1qR/p33: Observations in cancer. Mol Immunol
61, 100-109
12. Ostrand-Rosenberg, S. (2008) Cancer and complement. Nat Biotechnol 26, 1348-1349
13. Markiewski, M. M., and Lambris, J. D. (2009) Is complement good or bad for cancer patients? A new
perspective on an old dilemma. Trends Immunol 30, 286-292
14. Wang, S. Y., and Weiner, G. (2008) Complement and cellular cytotoxicity in antibody therapy of cancer.
Expert Opin Biol Ther 8, 759-768
15. Markiewski, M. M., DeAngelis, R. A., Benencia, F., Ricklin-Lichtsteiner, S. K., Koutoulaki, A., Gerard,
C., Coukos, G., and Lambris, J. D. (2008) Modulation of the antitumor immune response by complement.
Nat Immunol 9, 1225-1235
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 11
11
16. Corrales, L., Ajona, D., Rafail, S., Lasarte, J. J., Riezu-Boj, J. I., Lambris, J. D., Rouzaut, A., Pajares, M.
J., Montuenga, L. M., and Pio, R. (2012) Anaphylatoxin C5a creates a favorable microenvironment for
lung cancer progression. J Immunol 189, 4674-4683
17. Saxena, A., Baliga, M. S., Ponemone, V., Kaur, K., Larsen, B., Fletcher, E., Greene, J., and Fayad, R.
(2013) Mucus and adiponectin deficiency: role in chronic inflammation-induced colon cancer. Int J
Colorectal Dis 28, 1267-1279
18. Wilczek, E., Rzepko, R., Nowis, D., Legat, M., Golab, J., Glab, M., Gorlewicz, A., Konopacki, F.,
Mazurkiewicz, M., Sladowski, D., Gornicka, B., Wasiutynski, A., and Wilczynski, G. M. (2008) The
possible role of factor H in colon cancer resistance to complement attack. Int J Cancer 122, 2030-2037
19. Scheele, J., Stangl, R., and Altendorf-Hofmann, A. (1990) Hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma:
impact of surgical resection on the natural history. Br J Surg 77, 1241-1246
20. Rombouts, K., Carloni, V., Mello, T., Omenetti, S., Galastri, S., Madiai, S., Galli, A., and Pinzani, M.
(2013) Myristoylated Alanine-Rich protein Kinase C Substrate (MARCKS) expression modulates the
metastatic phenotype in human and murine colon carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett 333,
244-252
21. Liu, J., Miwa, T., Hilliard, B., Chen, Y., Lambris, J. D., Wells, A. D., and Song, W. C. (2005) The
complement inhibitory protein DAF (CD55) suppresses T cell immunity in vivo. J Exp Med 201, 567-577
22. Miwa, T., Sato, S., Gullipalli, D., Nangaku, M., and Song, W. C. (2013) Blocking properdin, the
alternative pathway, and anaphylatoxin receptors ameliorates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in
decay-accelerating factor and CD59 double-knockout mice. J Immunol 190, 3552-3559
23. Zhang, C., Li, Y., Wang, C., Wu, Y., Cui, W., Miwa, T., Sato, S., Li, H., Song, W. C., and Du, J. (2014)
Complement 5a receptor mediates angiotensin II-induced cardiac inflammation and remodeling.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34, 1240-1248
24. Yang, M., Shao, J. H., Miao, Y. J., Cui, W., Qi, Y. F., Han, J. H., Lin, X., and Du, J. (2014) Tumor
cell-activated CARD9 signaling contributes to metastasis-associated macrophage polarization. Cell Death
Differ 21, 1290-1302
25. Morimoto-Tomita, M., Ohashi, Y., Matsubara, A., Tsuiji, M., and Irimura, T. (2005) Mouse colon
carcinoma cells established for high incidence of experimental hepatic metastasis exhibit accelerated and
anchorage-independent growth. Clin Exp Metastasis 22, 513-521
26. Ma, F., Feng, J., Zhang, C., Li, Y., Qi, G., Li, H., Wu, Y., Fu, Y., Zhao, Y., Chen, H., Du, J., and Tang, H.
(2014) The requirement of CD8+ T cells to initiate and augment acute cardiac inflammatory response to
high blood pressure. J Immunol 192, 3365-3373
27. Qiu, S. L., Xiao, Z. C., Piao, C. M., Xian, Y. L., Jia, L. X., Qi, Y. F., Han, J. H., Zhang, Y. Y., and Du, J.
(2014) AMP-activated protein kinase alpha2 protects against liver injury from metastasized tumors via
reduced glucose deprivation-induced oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 289, 9449-9459
28. Wu, Y., Li, Y., Zhang, C., A, X., Wang, Y., Cui, W., Li, H., and Du, J. (2014) S100a8/a9 released by
CD11b+Gr1+ neutrophils activates cardiac fibroblasts to initiate angiotensin II-Induced cardiac
inflammation and injury. Hypertension 63, 1241-1250
29. Pan, L., Li, Y., Jia, L., Qin, Y., Qi, G., Cheng, J., Qi, Y., Li, H., and Du, J. (2012) Cathepsin S deficiency
results in abnormal accumulation of autophagosomes in macrophages and enhances Ang II-induced
cardiac inflammation. PLoS One 7, e35315
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 12
12
30. Li, Y., Zhang, C., Wu, Y., Han, Y., Cui, W., Jia, L., Cai, L., Cheng, J., Li, H., and Du, J. (2012)
Interleukin-12p35 deletion promotes CD4 T-cell-dependent macrophage differentiation and enhances
angiotensin II-Induced cardiac fibrosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32, 1662-1674
31. Piao, C., Youn, C. K., Jin, M., Yoon, S. P., Chang, I. Y., Lee, J. H., and You, H. J. (2012) MEK2 regulates
ribonucleotide reductase activity through functional interaction with ribonucleotide reductase small
subunit p53R2. Cell Cycle 11, 3237-3249
32. Piao, C., Jin, M., Kim, H. B., Lee, S. M., Amatya, P. N., Hyun, J. W., Chang, I. Y., and You, H. J. (2009)
Ribonucleotide reductase small subunit p53R2 suppresses MEK-ERK activity by binding to ERK kinase
2. Oncogene 28, 2173-2184
33. Peng, Q., Li, K., Wang, N., Li, Q., Asgari, E., Lu, B., Woodruff, T. M., Sacks, S. H., and Zhou, W. (2009)
Dendritic cell function in allostimulation is modulated by C5aR signaling. J Immunol 183, 6058-6068
34. Yang, M., Liu, J., Shao, J., Qin, Y., Ji, Q., Zhang, X., and Du, J. (2014) Cathepsin S-mediated autophagic
flux in tumor-associated macrophages accelerate tumor development by promoting M2 polarization. Mol
Cancer 13, 43
35. Murdoch, C., Muthana, M., Coffelt, S. B., and Lewis, C. E. (2008) The role of myeloid cells in the
promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 8, 618-631
36. Guo, R. F., and Ward, P. A. (2005) Role of C5a in inflammatory responses. Annu Rev Immunol 23,
821-852
37. Fujimoto, H., Sangai, T., Ishii, G., Ikehara, A., Nagashima, T., Miyazaki, M., and Ochiai, A. (2009)
Stromal MCP-1 in mammary tumors induces tumor-associated macrophage infiltration and contributes to
tumor progression. Int J Cancer 125, 1276-1284
38. Saji, H., Koike, M., Yamori, T., Saji, S., Seiki, M., Matsushima, K., and Toi, M. (2001) Significant
correlation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression with neovascularization and progression of
breast carcinoma. Cancer 92, 1085-1091
39. Tang, H., Amara, U., Tang, D., Barnes, M. A., McDonald, C., and Nagy, L. E. (2013) Synergistic
interaction between C5a and NOD2 signaling in the regulation of chemokine expression in RAW 264.7
macrophages. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 4, 30-37
40. Ji, R. C. (2014) Hypoxia and lymphangiogenesis in tumor microenvironment and metastasis. Cancer Lett
346, 6-16
41. Gao, D., and Mittal, V. (2009) The role of bone-marrow-derived cells in tumor growth, metastasis
initiation and progression. Trends Mol Med 15, 333-343
42. Xu, B., Li, K. P., Shen, F., Xiao, H. Q., Cai, W. S., Li, J. L., Liu, Q. C., and Jia, L. (2013) Ulinastatin
reduces cancer recurrence after resection of hepatic metastases from colon cancer by inhibiting MMP-9
activation via the antifibrinolytic pathway. Biomed Res Int 2013, 437950
43. Inoue, H., Mizuno, M., Uesu, T., Ueki, T., and Tsuji, T. (1994) Distribution of complement regulatory
proteins, decay-accelerating factor, CD59/homologous restriction factor 20 and membrane cofactor
protein in human colorectal adenoma and cancer. Acta Med Okayama 48, 271-277
44. Niehans, G. A., Cherwitz, D. L., Staley, N. A., Knapp, D. J., and Dalmasso, A. P. (1996) Human
carcinomas variably express the complement inhibitory proteins CD46 (membrane cofactor protein),
CD55 (decay-accelerating factor), and CD59 (protectin). Am J Pathol 149, 129-142
45. Thorsteinsson, L., O'Dowd, G. M., Harrington, P. M., and Johnson, P. M. (1998) The complement
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 13
13
regulatory proteins CD46 and CD59, but not CD55, are highly expressed by glandular epithelium of
human breast and colorectal tumour tissues. APMIS 106, 869-878
46. Davalos, A. R., Coppe, J. P., Campisi, J., and Desprez, P. Y. (2010) Senescent cells as a source of
inflammatory factors for tumor progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev 29, 273-283
47. Motz, G. T., and Coukos, G. (2011) The parallel lives of angiogenesis and immunosuppression: cancer and
other tales. Nat Rev Immunol 11, 702-711
48. Erreni, M., Mantovani, A., and Allavena, P. (2011) Tumor-associated Macrophages (TAM) and
Inflammation in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Microenviron 4, 141-154
49. Zheng, J., Yang, M., Shao, J., Miao, Y., Han, J., and Du, J. (2013) Chemokine receptor CX3CR1
contributes to macrophage survival in tumor metastasis. Mol Cancer 12, 141
50. Lanca, T., and Silva-Santos, B. (2012) The split nature of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes: Implications for
cancer surveillance and immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology 1, 717-725
Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Cui Wei, Wenmei Zhang, Taotao Li, Congcong Zhang and
Sa Liu for their technical assistance.
FOOTNOTES
*This work was supported by grants from the Chinese High Technology Research and Development Program
(2012AA02A201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81301797, 31090363, 81430050), and the
Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7122026).
1To whom correspondence should be addressed: Jie Du, Ph. D, Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases,
Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China. Phone: +86-10-6445-6030; Fax:
+86-10-6445-6095; E-mail: [email protected]
2The abbreviations used are: MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, MIP-1α: Macrophage Inflammatory
Proteins 1 alpha, MIP-1β: Macrophage Inflammatory Proteins 1 beta, RANTES: Regulated on activation, normal T
cell expressed and secreted, IL-1β: interleukin 1 beta, IL-6: interleukin 6, IL-10: interleukin 10, IL-12: interleukin
12, IL-23: interleukin 23, TGFβ: transforming growth factor beta, Arg-1: Arginase 1, Nitric oxide synthase 2: NOS2.
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 14
14
FIGURE LEGENDS
Figure 1. C5a production by colon cancer cell lines and plasma from mice with hepatic metastasis of colon cancer.
A. Secretion of C5a and C3a by colon cancer SL4 cells after 48 hr incubation in serum-free medium. C5a and C3a
levels were determined by ELISA. Data represent the mean±SEM from three independent experiments. *p < 0.05
vs. time zero. B. Secretion of C5a by mice colon cancer SL4 or CT26 cells after 48 hr incubation in serum-free
medium. C. Secretion of C5a by human colon cancer HCT116 or SW480 cells after 48 h incubation in serum-free
medium. D. Plasma C5a levels over a time course after intrasplenic injection of SL4 colon carcinoma cells and
non-transformed NIH3T3 cells (5105) into mice.
Figure 2. C5a originated from SL4 cells facilitates tumor metastasis of colon cancer. A. Gross tumor of colon
cancer in spleen 14 days after intrasplenic injection of SL4 colon carcinoma cells (5105) and SL4 sh-C5 cells into
mice (n=4). The mean±SEM of C5 mRNA expression in SL4 cells and SL4 sh-C5 cells are quantified by
Real-time PCR (right panel), **p < 0.01 vs. sh-cont. B. The mean±SEM of tumor weights and tumor area % of
liver tissue are quantified (bottom panel), *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01 vs. sh-Cont. B. Gross hepatic metastases of colon
cancer 14 days after intrasplenic injection of SL4 colon carcinoma cells (5105). Mice were pretreated with control
antibody (Cont IgG) or C5 antibody (C5 Ab) (n=4). The mean±SEM of tumor weights (upper panel) and tumor
area % of liver tissue (bottom panel). ***p < 0.001, *p < 0.05 vs. control antibody.
Figure 3. Host C5a receptor deficiency inhibits tumor metastasis. A. Gross hepatic metastases of colon cancer 14
days after intrasplenic injection of SL4 colon carcinoma cells (5105) into wild-type (WT) and C5aR-deficient mice
(upper panel) (n=5). HE staining shows metastatic foci of liver colon cancer 14 days after intrasplenic injection of
SL4 colon carcinoma cells (5×105) into WT and C5aR-/- mice. (n=5) (lower panel). The mean±SEM of tumor
weights (upper panel) and tumor area % of liver tissue (lower panel) is quantified. **p < 0.01 vs. WT. B.
Immunohistochemical analysis of Ki-67 expression after injection of SL4 colon carcinoma cells into WT and
C5aR-/- mice is shown (n=6). C. TUNNEL staining shows apoptosis of liver colon cancer 1 day after intrasplenic
injection of SL4 (5105) into WT and C5aR-/- mice (n=4).
Figure 4. C5aR deficiency decreases inflammatory cell infiltration in hepatic metastases of SL4 colon cancer. A.
CD4+T lymphocytes (CD45+CD3+CD4+) and CD8+ T lymphocytes (CD45+CD3+CD8+) (left panel); and monocytes
(CD45+CD11b+), neutrophils (CD45+Ly6G+), and dendritic cells (CD45+CD11C+) (right panel) were quantified by
flow cytometry analyses of blood from WT and C5aR-/- mice. Data represent the mean ± SEM for n=5 mice per
group. B. Macrophages (CD45+CD11b+), neutrophils (CD45+Ly6G+), and dendritic cells (CD45+CD11C+), were
detected by flow cytometry analyses of hepatic metastases of SL4 colon cancer in WT and C5aR-deficient mice.
Data represent the mean±SEM for n=5 mice per group. *, p<0.05, **, P<0.01 vs. WT mice.
Figure 5. C5aR protein expression in tumor infiltrating macrophages and neutrophils. A. Double-color
immunofluorescence analyses of macrophages and C5aR expression in metastatic foci in the liver from WT and
C5aR-/- mice. The sections were immunostained using a combination of anti-F4/80 and anti- C5aR antibodies.
Bars=25μm. B. Double-color immunofluorescence analyses of neutrophils and C5aR expression in metastatic foci in
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 15
15
the liver from WT and C5aR-/- mice. The sections were immunostained using a combination of anti-Ly6G and anti-
C5aR antibodies. Bars=50 μm.
Figure 6. Bone marrow of C5aR-deficient mice confers a reduced size of hepatic metastases of colon cancer A.
Gross hepatic metastases of colon cancer in bone marrow chimeric mice. WT or C5aR-deficient (KO) mice were
grafted with either WT or KO bone marrow cells. Tumor samples were collected 14 days after intrasplenic injection
of SL4 colon carcinoma cells (5×105) (n=4). B. Quantification of tumor weights of colon cancer from various bone
marrow chimeric mice (mean±SEM of 4 mice in each group). *, p<0.05, **, P<0.01 vs. WT.
Figure 7. Effect of C5a on macrophage chemokine release in SL4 cells. A. mRNA levels of MCP-1, MIP-1,
MIP-1MIP-2, or RANTES were detected by real-time PCR from hepatic metastases of SL4 cells in WT or
C5aR-/- mice. Results represent mean±SEM of expression normalized to GAPDH and vs. WT mice. **p< 0.01 vs.
WT. B. Protein levels of chemokines, including KC, MCP-1, MIP-1, MIP-1, or RANTES were detected by
CBA assay of macrophages or neutrophils from WT and C5aR-/- mice pretreated with PBS or 50nM recombinant
C5a, subtracted the basal level at time zero. Data represent mean±SEM. *, p<0.05 vs. WT. C. Protein levels of
phospho-Akt, phospho-p38, phosphor-p42/44, total Akt, total p38, total p42/44, or actin were detected by Western
Blot of macrophages from WT and C5aR-/- mice pretreated with PBS or 50nM recombinant C5a (left panel);
Protein levels of MCP-1 were detected by CBA assay of macrophages from WT and C5aR-/- mice pretreated with
MK-2206 (1μM) for 30 min, then treated PBS or 50nM recombinant C5a (right panel). Data represent
mean±SEM. **p< 0.01, *, p<0.05 vs. WT control.
Figure 8. C5a receptor deficiency inhibits tumor immunosuppressive capacity in metastases of colon cancer. A.
mRNA levels of NOS, IL-23, IL-1, or IL-12p40 were measured by real-time PCR of hepatic metastases of SL4
colon cancer in WT and C5aR-deficient mice. B. mRNA levels of Arg1, TGF-, IL-10 or IL-12p35 were measured
by real-time PCR of hepatic metastases of SL4 cells in WT and C5aR-deficient mice. Data represent the mean ±
SEM for n=5 mice per group. *p<0.05 vs. WT mice. C. Invasion assay of SL4 cells were performed with
macrophages from WT and C5aR-/- mice pretreated with PBS or 50nM recombinant C5a. Data represent
mean±SEM *, p<0.05 vs. WT control.
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 16
16
Table
Table 1. Sequences of primers used in real-time PCR
Primer Forward Reverse
MCP-1 CAG GTC CCT GTC ATG CTT CT GTC AGC ACA GAC CTC TCT CT
MIP-1 CCA AGT CTT CTC AGC GCC ATA GAT GAA TTG GCG TGG AAT CTT C
MIP-1 TGC TCG TGG CTG CCT TCT CTG CCG GGA GGT GTA AGA GA
MIP-1 CCCTCTCCTTCCTCATTCTTACA AGTCTTGAAAGCCCATGTGAAA
RANTES ACC ATG AAG ATC TCT GCA GC TGA ACC CAC TTC TTC TCT GG
Arginase 1 CCTGAAGGAACTGAAAGGAAAG TTGGCAGATATGCAGGGAGT
IL-1β GCCCATCCTCTGTGACTCAT AGGCCACAGGTATTTTGTCG
IL-6 GCTACCAAACTGGATATAATCAGGA CCAGGTAGCTATGGTACTCCAGAA
IL-10 CCAAGCCTTATCGGAAATGA TTTTCACAGGGGAGAAATCG
IL12-p35 CCATCAGCAGATCATTCTAGACAA CGCCATTATGATTCAGAGACTG
IL12-p40 GATTCAGACTCCAGGGGACA TGGTTAGCTTCTGAGGACACATC
IL23-p19 TCCCTACTAGGACTCAGCCAAC TGGGCATCTGTTGGGTCT
TGFβ1 TTGCTTCAGCTCCACAGAGA TGGTTGTAGAGGGCAAGGAC
NOS2 GGGCTGTCACGGAGATCA CCATGATGGTCACATTCTGC
Tubulin TCTAACCCGTTGCTATCATGC GCCATGTTCCAGGCAGTAG
C5-1 GCCAAGAAGAACGCTGCAAA TCGCTGCTCACAGGTTTCAT
C5-2 GCAGACGAAAGGAGTTCCCA TTTGGGGAGGTGGGTTAGGA
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 17
pro
tein
(p
g/m
l)
600
500
400
300
C5a C3a
0h48h*
A
CC
5a (
pg
/ml)
500
400
300
NIH3T3SL4
0 10d 20d
* *
Fig. 1
C5a
(p
g/m
l)
16000
12000
8000
0h 48h
HCT116 SW480
C5a
(p
g/m
l)
625
375
250
0h 48h
SL4 CT26
500
*
*
*
*
D
B
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 18
A
sh-Cont sh-C5
75
25
50
0Cont sh-Cont sh-C5
100C
5 m
RN
A le
vel
**1.2
0.3
0.6
0
0.9
Cont sh-Cont sh-C5
tota
l w
eig
ht(
g)
liver
wit
h t
um
or
6
2
4
0
*
sh-C
on
tsh
-C5
tum
or
area
%
of
liv
er t
issu
e ***
Co
nt
Fig. 2
Co
nt
Co
nt
IgG
C5
Ab
100
25
Cont Cont-IgG C5-Ab
tum
or
area
%
of
liv
er t
issu
e
0
***
50
75
tota
l w
eig
ht(
g)
liver
wit
h t
um
or
4.0
0
6.0
Cont Cont-IgG C5-Ab
2.0
*
Co
nt
IgG
C5
Ab
Co
nt
HE Staining
B
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 19
AW
TC
5aR
-/-
Cont WT C5aR-/-
3
1
2
tota
l w
eig
ht(
g)
liver
wit
h t
um
or
0
**
Co
nt
60
20
40
Cont WT C5aR-/-
tum
or
area
%
of
liv
er t
issu
e
0
**
B
WT
C5a
R-/
-
HE Staining
Ki-
67
Cont WT C5aR-/-
Ki6
7p
osi
tive
are
a(%
)
6
2
4
0
8 *
Co
nt
Fig. 3
WT C5aR-/-Cont
C
WT
TU
NE
L
C5aR -/- NS
WT C5aR -/-
1
2
0
TU
NE
L p
osi
tive
cel
l(%
)
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 20
WT
C5a
R-/
-W
TC
5aR
-/-
A
BC5aRLy6G DAPI merge
C5aRF4/80 DAPI merge
Fig. 4
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 21
CD
3e+
cells
in b
loo
d(%
)
CD4 CD8
CD
45+
cells
in b
loo
d(%
)
100
40
20
0
CD11b Ly6G
60
80
WTC5aR-/-
80
40
20
0
60
WTC5aR-/-
CD11c
A
B
CD
45+
cells
in b
loo
d(%
)
100
10
5
0
60
80
15
70
90
F4/80 Ly6G CD11c
F4/80
Ly6G
CD
45
81.30%
70.54%
13.54%
9.04%
2.64% 1.54%
WT C5aR -/-
CD11c
WTC5aR-/-**
*
*
Fig. 5
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 22
WTBM-> WT
KOBM -> KO
KOBM -> WT
WTBM-> KO
Bone marrow transplantation
A
B
WTBM-> WT KOBM -> KO KOBM -> WT WTBM-> KO
3
1
2
tota
l w
eig
ht(
g)
liver
wit
h t
um
or
0
**5
4
*
Fig. 6
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 23
Ap
rote
in (
pg
/ml)
450
300
150
0
*
*
*
macrophage neutrophil
WT
WT+C5a
KO+C5aKO
B
3
1
2
mR
NA
leve
l(f
old
s o
f co
ntr
ol)
0
4
**
WTC5aR-/-
C
p-Akt
Akt
p-P38
P38
p-Erk1/2
actin
WT C5aR -/-C5a(min) 0 15 30 0 15 30
MC
P-1
(p
g/m
l)
150
100
50
0
WT
Cont
MK-2206+C5a
C5aR -/-
C5a**
Fig. 7
Erk1/2
*
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 24
0.75
0.25
0.50
mR
NA
leve
l(f
old
s o
f co
ntr
ol)
0
1.00
1.25
mR
NA
leve
l(f
old
s o
f co
ntr
ol)
3.00
1.00
2.00
0
4.00
5.00
NOS2 IL-1β IL-23 p19 IL-12 p40
Arg-1 IL-10 IL-12 p35 TGF-β
WTC5aR-/-
WTC5aR-/-
* * *NS
*
*
NS
NS
A
B
Fig. 8
C
Inva
sio
n a
ssay
(fo
lds
of
WT
)
0
WT Macrophage
C5aR -/-Macrophage
3
6
9 *ContC5a 50nM
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from
Page 25
Jia, Wenchao Song and Jie DuChunmei Piao, Lun Cai, Shulan Qiu, Lixin Inflammatory Cell InfiltrationChemoattractant Protein-1-MediatedMetastases of Colon Cancer via Monocyte Complement 5a Enhances HepaticCell Biology:
published online March 4, 2015J. Biol. Chem.
10.1074/jbc.M114.612622Access the most updated version of this article at doi:
.JBC Affinity SitesFind articles, minireviews, Reflections and Classics on similar topics on the
Alerts:
When a correction for this article is posted•
When this article is cited•
to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alertsClick here
http://www.jbc.org/content/early/2015/03/04/jbc.M114.612622.full.html#ref-list-1
This article cites 0 references, 0 of which can be accessed free at
at NY
U School of M
edicine Library on M
arch 15, 2015http://w
ww
.jbc.org/D
ownloaded from