Top Banner
Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University
37

Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Dec 14, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Competitive Prices as aRanking System over Networks

Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner

Tel Aviv University

Page 2: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Ranking systems based (only) on network structure

Examples:•Science Citation Index:

Rank of article = number of citations•Google’s PageRank:

Link from a higher ranked item is worth more(Note circular definition)

Page 3: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Approaches to ranking

• Counting citations– Citation index (Garfield 1960)

• Markov chain:– PageRank (Wei 1951, Kendall 1955, Brin & Page 1998)

• Axiomatic:– Palacios-Huerta and Volij (2004)– Altman and Tennenholtz (2008): Axiomatization of PageRank– Demange (2011): Separates quality and refereeing power

• Dynamics:– Demange (2011): Ranking affects citations affect ranking…– Liebowitz and Palmer (1984): Iteration (impact adjusted) method

Page 4: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Our approach

• Construct economy based on the network of links• Derive ranks from the competitive equilibrium prices

Page 5: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Pure exchange economy – a reminder

• N consumer

• Each consumer brings an intial endowment (a basket of L goods)

• Each has a utility function

• In equilibrium each consumer sells his initial endowment and buys in exchange the best basket possible (subject to budget constraint)

• In equilibrium market clears

Page 6: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

What is a network?

• N nodes (web page, article, friends)

• There are (directed) edges connecting between nodes

• Examples: web-page i gives a link to j; paper i gives a citation to paper j; i and j are friends (two edges)

Page 7: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Pure exchange economy in a network

Page 8: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Pure exchange economy in a network

Page 9: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Example 1

Page 10: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Cobb-Douglas utility

Page 11: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Example 2 (with Cobb-Douglas utility)

Page 12: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Example 2 (with Cobb-Douglas utility)

Page 13: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Quasi equilibrium (Debreu 1962)

Definition:

1.Markets clear

2.Consumers with positive budget maximize utility subject to budget constraint

3.Consumers with 0 budget only required to satisfy budget constraint

•Differs from competitive equilibrium only for consumers with 0 budget who derive utility from a 0-priced goods… They consume the leftovers, rather than an unbounded amount

•Quasi equilibrium exists under very mild conditions (utility functions continuous + sets of preferred baskets convex)

Page 14: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

A little bit of notation

Page 15: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Cobb-Douglas – general solution

Page 16: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Cobb-Douglas – general solution

Page 17: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

PageRank

Page 18: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

PageRank

Page 19: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

CES utility

Page 20: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Example 1 with CES utility

• In this example the parameter affects cardinal ranking but not ordinal (except for endpoints)

• We can easily generate examples where ordinal ranking changes

Page 21: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

CES utility improve

• In the Markov approach one can naturally generate only PageRank. The degree of freedom in choosing the CES parameter can only be replicated by having transition probabilities that depend on the final invariant distribution weights.

Page 22: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Uniqueness of Quasi Equilibrium

Page 23: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Example: multiple equilibria

Page 24: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

The Citation Index

Page 25: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Rank and reviewing power

• Ranking system gives each article a quality score• Each article also has a reviewing power

(importance given by ranking system to its links)– In PageRank, reviewing power ≡ rank– In SCI/NCI, reviewing power independent of rank

• In world of internet, PageRank seems better• In world of articles, PageRank is problematic:

– Case of articles on a timeline, that can only cite older articles. PageRank gives 0 to all of them, but the oldest

– PageRank works only with sufficient simultaneity

Page 26: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Rank and reviewing power

Page 27: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Economy with tax

Page 28: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Example 2 with tax

Page 29: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Tax can also change ordinal ranking

Page 30: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Ranking-biased agents

Page 31: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Ranking-biased agents

Page 32: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Ranking-biased agents

Page 33: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Ranking-biased agents

Page 34: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Ranking-biased agents

Page 35: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Ranking-biased agents

Page 36: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Ranking-biased agents

Page 37: Competitive Prices as a Ranking System over Networks Ehud Lehrer and Ady Pauzner Tel Aviv University.

Summary

• Model of competitive economy as a device for ranking• Ranking determined by choice of utility function• Uniqueness of ranking holds at least for gross substitutes

(and of course connected network)• Cobb-Douglas economy yields PageRank• No exchange economy yields SCI or NCI• Minimum economy yields outcome of interaction between

PageRank and linearly biased agents• By adding a simple taxation scheme we can control

how reviewing power depends on assessed quality