Top Banner
Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University at Albany, SUNY
17

Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Dec 22, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies

Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric

SciencesUniversity at Albany, SUNY

Page 2: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Introduction

● This study investigates Equatorial Rossby (ER) wave activity in the Central Pacific during the September-November 1997, the peak of a very strong El Nino.

● These waves might be associated with three events of twin tropical cyclogenesis.

● Waves are examined using three methods:– Unfiltered data– 15-40 day band-pass time filter– Space-time filter

Page 3: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Space-time Filters● Wheeler and Kiladis (1999; hereafter WK99)

– n = 1 ER wave filter that is bounded by the dispersion curves for U = 0 and 8 m < h < 90 m

– Separates data into symmetric and antisymmetric components about the equator

● Roundy and Frank (2004) – ER wave filter expands beyond dispersion curves– Enforces no symmetry constraints

● Yang et al. (2003)– Data are broadly filtered into eastward and westward

propagating components– Each component is then projected onto the meridional

structure from shallow water modes– Allows for U ≠ 0

Page 4: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Unfiltered Hovmöller

•850 hPa u contoured every 3 m s-1, with westerlies in red and easterlies in blue, averaged 2.5°S-2.5°N

•Tb below 290 K shaded in 25 K intervals, averaged 10°S-10°N

•Locations of tropical cyclogenesis within 10.5° of equator, with open symbols for SH

Page 5: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

15-40 Day Hovmöller

•850 hPa u contoured every 1 m s-1, with westerlies in red and easterlies in blue, averaged 2.5°S-2.5°N

•Tb shaded every 5 K, with negative anomalies in warm colors and positive anomalies in cool colors, averaged 10°S-10°N

•Locations of tropical cyclogenesis within 10.5° of equator, with open symbols for SH

Page 6: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

WK99 ER band filtered Hovmöller•850 hPa u contoured every 0.5 m s-1, with westerlies in red and easterlies in blue, averaged 2.5°S-2.5°N

•Tb shaded every 2.5 K, with negative anomalies in warm colors and positive anomalies in cool colors, averaged 10°S-10°N

•Locations of tropical cyclogenesis within 10.5° of equator, with open symbols for SH

Page 7: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

15-40 Day Hovmöller

•850 hPa u contoured every 1 m s-1, with easterly anomalies dashed

•Black line indicates objective wave tracks

Page 8: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

15-40 Day Hovmöller

•850 hPa u contoured every 1 m s-1, with easterly anomalies dashed

•Black line indicates objective wave tracks

•Magenta line indicates linear best-fit of wave tracks

•Green numbers show best-fit phase speed (m s-1)

•Blue numbers show r2 values

-3.480.71

-4.820.89

-4.670.92

Page 9: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

WK99 ER band filtered Hovmöller

•850 hPa u contoured every 1 m s-1, with easterly anomalies dashed

•Black line indicates objective wave tracks

•Magenta line indicates linear best-fit of wave tracks

•Green numbers show best-fit phase speed (m s-1)

•Blue numbers show r2 values

-5.400.99

-4.731.00

-4.531.00

Page 10: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Interaction with Background Convergence

Time-filtered variance

Background zonal wind

Background zonal divergence

Space-timefiltered variance

Page 11: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Unfiltered Map•850 hPa wind vectors

•850 hPa heights contoured every 10 m

•Tb below 290 K shaded in 25 K intervals

Page 12: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Time-Filtered Map•850 hPa wind anomaly vectors

•850 hPa height anomalies contoured every 3 m, with positive anomalies in red and negative anomalies in blue

•Tb shaded every 5 K, with negative anomalies in warm colors and positive anomalies in cool colors

Page 13: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Asymmetric Space-Time Filtered Map•850 hPa wind anomaly vectors

•850 hPa height anomalies contoured every 2 m, with positive anomalies in red and negative anomalies in blue

•Tb shaded every 2.5 K, with negative anomalies in warm colors and positive anomalies in cool colors

Page 14: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Symmetric Space-Time Filtered Map•850 hPa wind anomaly vectors

•850 hPa height anomalies contoured every 2 m, with positive anomalies in red and negative anomalies in blue

•Tb shaded every 2.5 K, with negative anomalies in warm colors and positive anomalies in cool colors

Page 15: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Summary

● Unfiltered Data– Strengths

● No concerns about artificial signals● Easy in real-time

– Weaknesses● Waves obscured by other features

Page 16: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Summary

● 15-40 Day Band-pass Filtered Data– Strengths

● Wave packet shows clearly in Hovmöller● Variance increases in a region of background zonal

convergence● Wind-height relationship resembles idealized mode

– Weaknesses● Difficult to determine phase speed

Page 17: Comparison of Techniques for Isolating Equatorial Rossby Waves in Synoptic Studies Carl J. Schreck, III Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University.

Summary

● WK99 Space-time Filter– Strengths

● Clearly separates each wave type● Smooth westward propagation● Waves can be clearly identified in maps, particularly

with symmetry constraints– Weaknesses

● Low amplitude● More difficult to examine the relationship between

filtered variance and zonal divergence