Top Banner
Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and CloudSat Matt Lebsock Chris Kummerow
14

Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and CloudSat

Feb 24, 2016

Download

Documents

Arnold Burger

Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and CloudSat. Matt Lebsock Chris Kummerow. Motivation. Radiosonde data [ Ohtake , 1963 ] Warm rain falls in all tropical ocean basins in all seasons more frequently than expected Shipboard Weather Reports [ Petty, 1995 ] - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and CloudSat

Matt LebsockChris Kummerow

Page 2: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Motivation• Radiosonde data [Ohtake, 1963]

– Warm rain falls in all tropical ocean basins in all seasons more frequently than expected• Shipboard Weather Reports [Petty, 1995]

– Drizzle and isolated showers are the preferred form of precipitation in many regions• DYCOMS-II [VanZanten et al., 2005]

– ‘on roughly a third of the flights mean surface rates approached or exceeded 0.5 mmd -1’’

• RICO [Snodgrass et al., 2009]– in situ: 2.23 mmd-1

– PR: 1.05 mmd-1

– GPCP: 1.25 mmd-1

• VOCALS [Wood et al., 2011]– POC boundary: 10-20 mmd-1

– Open Cells: several mmd-1

– Closed cell: 90% evaporation of drizzle• And many more….

Page 3: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Motivation from CloudSat

• Areas in the subtropical eastern ocean basins where rain fraction exceeds 5%.

• Dominated by warm rain.• Small spatial scales (~5km)

This rain poses a significant challenge to AMSR-E.• Spatial scale• Moderate emmsission signature• No ice scattering

Is it important?

Page 4: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

CloudSat Algorithm Sensitivity:Reflectivity vs. Attenuation

ReflectivitySolution

AttenuationSolution

Rain Rates

Observations

• Challenges1. Attenuation2. Multiple-scattering3. Limited sensitivity at high rates

• Opportunities1. Extreme sensitivity to

light/moderate rain2. ~1km Spatial resolution

Useful for quantifying rain from shallow isolated moist convection that other sensors may miss

Page 5: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

CloudSat vs. AMSR-E

Key Points1. Regions of under-catch by the

CloudSat algorithm in the deep tropics can be related to saturation of the CloudSat signal in the heaviest rain.

2. CloudSat observes more rain than AMSR-E in regions that have been historically difficult for the passive microwave sensors: The storm tracks The subtropical ocean basins

AMSR-E version GPROF-2004.AMSR-E subset to CloudSat ground track (2007-2008).Common data screening methodology has been employed to both datasets.

(1)

(2)

(3)

Page 6: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Daily AveragePrecipitation (2006-2009)

Areal Mean Precipitation (mm/day)

2C-Rain-Profile 0.23

2C-PRECIP-COLUMN 0.36

CloudSat w/ Z-R 0.28

EPIC In Situ (Comstock et al. 2004)

0.20

• New CloudSat rain rates perform better than initial estimates.1. Reflectivity based solution2. Evaporation modeled

Climatological Validation of CloudSat:Southeast Pacific

Courtesy of Anita Rapp (TAMU)

Page 7: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Distribution of Warm Rain

• Accumulation dominated by frequency of occurrence, not intensity

• Accumulation maxima:– East-Pac ITCZ– Trade Cumulus regions.

Page 8: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Dependence on Cloud Depth

Page 9: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Regime Dependence

• Warm rain rates are maximized at moderate boundary layer depths and moisture contents

Suppressed

Ice phase prevalent

Page 10: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Conceptual Model

Inversion

EastWest

Warm Rain Rate

Total Rain Rate

Page 11: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

CloudSat vs. AMSR-E:Warm Rain

1. AMSR-E subset to CloudSat ground Track

2. Common Data screening:– 1 degree boxes in which CloudSat

observes no clouds colder than 273 K retained.

– Warm rain near deep convection or cirrus screened.

AMSR-Ewarm = f * CloudSatwarm

f = 11%

Page 12: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

How much warm rain does GPROF miss?

Ocean 60N/60S GlobalCloudSat Warm Rain 0.34 [mm/day] 0.23 [mm/day]AMSR-E Missed (f = 11%) 0.30 [mm/day] 0.20 [mm/day]

~ 5 W/m2

Ocean 60N/60S Global

CloudSat Warm Rain (screened) 0.11 [mm/day] 0.071 [mm/day]

AMSR-E Missed (screened) 0.10 [mm/day] 0.062 [mm/day]

Screened Scenes

All Scenes

Page 13: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

GPROF 2010?

• AMSR-E (GPROF-2010) produces more light rain.

• Designed to reproduce Precipitation Radar results. PR still misses most warm rain.

Courtesy of Wes Berg (CSU)

GPROF 2004GPROF 2010

Page 14: Comparison of Oceanic Warm Rain from AMSR-E and  CloudSat

Summary• CloudSat rain rates suggest that GPROF-2004 may miss up

to 0.2 mmd-1 globally.– Small spatial extent (~5km)– Light/moderate rates– Warm tops

• GPROF-2010 will increase light rain rates however regional differences will most likely leave room for further improvement.

• The dominant mode of missed rain is shallow cumulus in the trades and the ITCZ (Not drizzle) in regimes with moderate boundary layer depths and moisture contents.

1. Difficult to distinguish from cloud emission

2. No scattering signal