Top Banner
Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock Characteristics Puale Bay Outcrops and NAS COST 1 Well Alaska Peninsula North Aleutian Basin
18

Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Jul 14, 2022

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic

Source Rock Characteristics

Puale Bay Outcrops and NAS COST 1 Well

Alaska Peninsula – North Aleutian Basin

Page 2: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Author(s) and affiliations:

Paul L. Decker

Alaska Division of Oil & Gas

Date presented:

March 27, 2008

Presentation Forum:

DNR Spring Technical Review Meeting, BP Energy Center

Acknowledgments of any external funding sources and in-kind contributors:

Field work and analyses for this study were conducted during 2004, 2005, and 2007 with funding

from multiple sources, including a U.S. Department of Energy grant from the Arctic Energy

Technology Development Laboratory at the University of Alaska Fairbanks to Rocky Reifenstuhl

(program head) and Paul McCarthy (principal investigator, UAF); Bristol Bay Native Corporation;

and Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys and Division of Oil and Gas operating and

capital improvement project budgets. Field samples were collected by Rocky Reifenstuhl, Robert

Gillis, Emily Finzel, and Karen Clautice (DGGS); the author, David Shafer, and Timothy Ryherd,

(DOG); Michael Whalen (UAF); and Robert Blodgett (consulting geologist).

Page 3: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Cs

Cs

CsCs

CsIs

Puale

BayN o r t h A l e u t i a n /

NAS

COST 1

Page 4: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Alaska Peninsula

Stratigraphic Column

• Upper Triassic Kamishak Fm- Shallow Marine carbonate

• Middle Jurassic Kialagvik Fm

(Tuxedni Gp equivalent)

- Marine-nonmarine? sh-slts-ss

• Miocene Bear Lake Fm

• Eocene-Oligocene Stepovak Fm

• Paleocene-Eocene Tolstoi Fm

- Nonmarine (coaly) to shallow marine

Puale Bay outcrops

NAS COST 1 well

Page 5: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

07RR027-038

07BG225-233(SE-NW)

07PD183-188 (SE-NW)

05EF100-103 (NW-SE)

05RR208-210 (SE-NW)

07PD191-194 (W-E)

07RR041-042 (W-E)

07BG237,07MW005

07RB11

07PD181-182

07MW003-004

07RB04-08 05RR211-213 (S-N)

05EF105

07PD195-199 (E-W)

07RR043-047 (E-W)

Puale Bay Sample Locations

Kamishak Fm (n=38)

Kialagvik Fm (n = 39)

Page 6: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

lower Kamishak Fm biostromal facies

micritic-fossiliferous faciesbasal unconformity

Pv?

Trk

angular

unconformity

minor

fault (?)

U D

Upper Triassic Kamishak Fm Outcrops Puale Bay

Page 7: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

upper contact, rusty ss-siltstone

carbonaceous

ss, thin coals

upward coarsening slts-ss

middle Kialagvik Fm

Js

Jk

Q

Jk

Middle Jurassic Kialagvik Fm Outcrops Puale Bay

dark gray fissile slts

lower Kialagvik Fm

Page 8: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Modified Van

Krevelen Diagram

Mesozoic

Units

Puale Bay

outcrops

Oil-prone Type I-II

kerogens

Page 9: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

A A’Quaternary

Bear Lake Fm

Unga equivStepovak Fm

Tolstoi

Fm

Mz?

Mz?Mz?

Tolstoi

Fm?

MMS-75-17-36

(~52 mi long)

Milky River Fm A

A’

B

B’

50 mi

N Aleutian

COST #1

B’BQuaternary

Milky River Fm

Bear Lake Fm

Unga equiv

Stepovak FmMz?

Mz?

Mz?

Tolstoi

Fm?

Mz?

Mz?

Mz?

Tolstoi

Fm?

Bear Lake Fm

Black Hills Uplift

(transpressional margin)

N Aleutian/

Bristol Bay

Basin

MMS-75-17-09

(~155 mi shown)A TA T

A T?

A T

North Aleutian Basin

Page 10: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Modified Van

Krevelen Diagram

Cenozoic

Units

NAS COST 1 well

• 420 Rock-Eval/TOC

analyses

anomalous coaly kerogens

highly anomalous

coaly kerogens

Oil-Prone Coals??

• Pyrolysis can overestimate

HC liquid-generation potential

of coaly source rocks

• Kerogen microscopy and

H/C, O/C atomic ratios data

Page 11: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Modified Van

Krevelen Diagram

Mesozoic

and Cenozoic

Units

Puale Bay and

NAS COST 1

Page 12: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Hydrogen Index, mg

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00

Hyd

roge

n In

de

x, m

g/g

TOC, %

Milky River-COST 1

Bear Lake-outcrop

Bear Lake-COST 1

Stepovak-COST 1

Tolstoi-COST 1

Kialagvik coal

Kialagvik silty mudst

Kamishak-outcrop

lean gas-prone

good-excellent gas-prone shales, carbonates

good-excellent mixed oil- & gas-prone

shales, carbonates

Type II oil-prone shales, carbonates

“oil shales”, oil-prone cannel & boghead

coals, tasmanites, etc..

dry gas-prone

potentially mixed oil- & gas-or condensate-prone (?)

non-source or

overmature

carbonaceous shales

carbonaceous shales

coals

lean oil-prone

Type I oil-prone shales, carbonates

coals

non-source or overmature

Hydrogen Index vs TOCH

ydro

gen

Ind

ex, m

g/g

TOC, %

Type and Quantity

of Organic Matter

Page 13: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

0.00

50.00

100.00

150.00

200.00

250.00

300.00

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00

S2, m

g/g

TOC, %

Kamishak

Kialagvik silty mudst

Kialagvik coal

Tolstoi-COST 1

Stepovak-COST 1

Bear Lake-COST 1

Bear Lake-outcrop

Milky River-COST 1

Bear Lake outcrop -- coals only y = 5.942x - 221.9

Pyrolyzed HC (S2) vs TOCTrue Average

Hydrogen Index

Full Data

Range

(coals)

Page 14: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

y = 7.4478x - 2.663

y = 6.5359x - 3.1453

y = 3.1936x - 3.6462

y = 1.6664x - 1.0885

y = 1.2263x - 0.7252

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

25.00

30.00

35.00

40.00

45.00

50.00

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00

S2, m

g/g

TOC, %

Kamishak

Kialagvik silty mudst

Tolstoi-COST 1

Stepovak-COST 1

Bear Lake-COST 1

Bear Lake-outcrop

Milky River-COST 1

Pyrolyzed HC (S2) vs TOCTrue Average

Hydrogen Index

Restricted

Data Range

(no coals)

Page 15: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

-155.44

-155.43

-155.42

-155.41

-155.40

-155.39

-155.38

-155.37

-155.36

-155.35

-155.34

0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00

Total Organic Carbon

0 500 1000

Hydrogen Index

Kialagvik

Kamishak

Longitude

(u

p-s

ecti

on

)

Typ

e I

Typ

e II

Typ

e II-

III

Typ

e III

co

als

so

urc

e

no

n-s

ourc

e

biostromal facies

Variation by Stratigraphic PositionKamishak and Kialagvik Fms, Puale Bay

Page 16: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Milky

River

Bear

Lake

Unga eq

Quat

Ste

po

va

kTo

lsto

i

Lean Elev Coal Gas-Prone Oil-ProneGas-

Cond Imm

Oil &

Assoc

Gas

Gas

North Aleutian Shelf COST #1

Geochemical Profile

TOC HI Ro

Page 17: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Sherwood and others, 2006 (MMS)

NAS COST 1 Vitrinite Reflectance

Page 18: Comparison of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Source Rock ...

Conclusions

Puale Bay Mesozoic units include highly oil-

prone source rocks • Upper Triassic Kamishak Fm: especially brown-gray

micritic limestone facies (avg HI = 745 mg/g)

• Middle Jurassic Kialagvik Fm: lower part, fissile dark

gray siltstone facies (avg HI = 654 mg/g)

NAS COST 1 well Cenozoic units are coaly &

dominantly gas-prone, minor liquid-prone

coals?• Eocene Tolstoi Fm: (avg HI = 319 mg/g)

• Eo-Oligocene Stepovak Fm: (avg HI = 167 mg/g)

• Miocene Bear Lake (avg HI = 123 mg/g)