Top Banner
Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall Allan Stewart, MD., Jonathan A. Yang, MD; Mark J. Russo, MD/MPH; Alexander Iribarne, MD; Brendan F. Scully; Rachel Easterwood; Craig R. Smith, MD; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
12

Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Feb 22, 2016

Download

Documents

Goro

Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified

Bentall

Allan Stewart, MD., Jonathan A. Yang, MD; Mark J. Russo, MD/MPH; Alexander Iribarne, MD; Brendan F. Scully; Rachel Easterwood; Craig R. Smith, MD; Division of

Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY

Page 2: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Aortic Insufficiency & Root Aneurysm

• Different treatment options exist• Bentall Procedure1

– Several modifications• Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR)– Sir Magdi Yacoub, Tirone David

• We have performed both at our Institution since 2005

1. Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascending aorta. Thorax. 23(4):338-9.

Page 3: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Methods

• Retrospective study• Peri-Operative and short-term data• VSRR via the re-implantation method

described by David, et al1

• Modified Bentall Procedures – novel composite biologic graft

1. David TE, Feindel CM. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992 April; 103(4):617-21.

Page 4: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Valve-Sparing Root Replacement

Page 5: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

BioRootEdwards Perimount Valve ATS 3f Valve

Page 6: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

BioRoot

Page 7: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Results

Valve-Sparing Root

ReplacementBioRoot p

Number of patients 111 175 -Mean Age in years (Range) 55 63 <0.0001Pre-Op AI 2+ 75 (67.6%) 145 (82.6%) 0.0044Mean Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time (min) 150.845.6 153.755.5 0.6

Mean Aortic Cross-Clamp Time (min) 112.433.4 108.934.8 0.4

Post-Op AI 2+ 0% 0% -Need for Re-op for AVR 2 (1.8%) 0 (0%) -30-day Mortality 1 (0.9%) 2 (1.1%) 0.8

Page 8: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Pre-Treatment Decisions

Page 9: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Can valve be Repaired?

Remodeling

“Real-time” Repair Algorithm (AI + Aneurysm)

Should it be Repaired?

Ignore

Repair

Replace

BioRoot

Mechanical Conduit

Reimplantation

Should it be Replaced?

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Page 10: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

When Should We Repair?• Aortic Leaflet Integrity– Reliable valve-sparing results with: • supple leaflets• normal annular size• Bicuspid and tri-leaflets have good 10-year data

– High Failure Rates with:• Severe AI• Multi-leaflet Prolapse• Multiple Fenestrations

Page 11: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

When Should We Replace?• Marked leaflet Asymmetry• Multiple leaflet Fenestrations• “Broken leaflets”

• Bicuspid Patients– Significant Thickening– Prolapse– Calcification– Multiple Fenestrations

• Connective Tissue Patients– Data is unclear – Be cautious in repairing

attenuated & severely prolapsed valves

Page 12: Comparison between Valve Sparing Aortic Root Replacement and Modified Bentall

Conclusions

• Similar operative times• Low rates of post-op AI, repeat AVR and

mortality• Similar short-term outcomes• Reproducible and safe• Need to delineate proper guidelines for

indications• Follow-up needed to assess long-term outcomes