Comparing Methods of Calculation - atc-trng.comatc-trng.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Arc-Flash-Calculation... · Calculation And found some existing needs. 12 November 17, 2004
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
V a ria b le F a u lt C u rre n t fo r 4 8 0 v o lts in B o x , 1 8 " W o rk D is ta n c e , 1 .2 5 " A rc G a p , 2 .4 C y c le C le a rin g T im e
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
16 20 30 40 50 60
C u rre n t in kA
Cal
/Cm
2
IE E E 1584 3 P has e inB ox NF P A 70E 3 P has e inB oxC om m erc ia l 1 P has e inAirC om m erc ia l 3 P has eB ox Min X 3 .7C om m erc ia l 3 P has eB ox Max X 6.5Lee 's Method Norm al 3P has e in AirD uke Heat F lux Norm al1 P has e in AirD uke Heat F lux 3P has e in B ox X 5 .0
2 .4 6 .0 1 0 .0 1 5 .0 2 0 .0 3 0 .0C le a r in g T im e in C y c le s
Cal
/Cm
2
!E E E 1 5 8 4
NF P A 7 0 E
C o m m e rc ia l No rm al
C o m m e rc ia l 3 P has eB o x M in. X 3 .7C o m m e rc ia l 3 P has eB o x M ax X 6 .5L e e 's M e tho d No rm al 3P has eD uke He at F lux No rm al
C o m m e rc ia l 3 P has e B o xM in. X 3 .7C o m m e rc ia l 3 P has e B o xM ax X 6 .5L e e 's M e tho d No rm al 3P has eD uke He at F lux No rm al
!E E E 1584 3 P hase inA irNFP A 70E 3 P hase inA irC ommerc ia l Normal 1P hase in A irC ommerc ia l 3 P hase A irM in. X 1.2C ommerc ia l 3 P hase A irMax X 2.2Lee's Method Normal 3P hase A irD uke Heat F lux Normal1 P hase in A irD uke Heat F lux 3 P hasein A ir X 2.8
Incident Energy Vs. VoltageIn Air @ 50kA with Lee’s Method
C ommerc ia l Normal 1P hase in A irC ommerc ia l 3 P hase A irM in. X 1.2C ommerc ia l 3 P hase A irMax X 2.2Lee's Method Normal 3P hase A irD uke Heat F lux Normal 1P hase in A irD uke Heat F lux 3 P hasein A ir X 2.8
Incident Energy Vs. VoltageIn Air @ 16kA with Lee’s Method
! E E E 1584 3 P has e inAirNF P A 70E 3 P has e inAirC om m erc ia l Norm al 1P has e in AirC om m erc ia l 3 P has eAir Min. X 1 .2C om m erc ia l 3 P has eAir Max X 2.2D uke Heat F lux Norm al1 P has e in AirD uke Heat F lux 3P has e in Air X 2 .8
V a r ia b le M e d iu m V o lta g e , S in g le P h a s e , 1 0 k A Arc in A ir , 6 0 " Ho t S tic k W o r k D is ta n c e , A r c G a p 6 " , 1 0 C y c le C le a r in g T im e
V ar iab le M ed iu m V o ltag e , S in g le P h ase , 25 kA Arc in Air , 18" R u b b er G lo ve W o rk D is tan ce , Arc G ap 6", 10 C yc le C lear in g T im e
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
2.40 4.16 12.47 13.80 24.94 34.50 46.00
S ource V o ltage kV
Cal
/Cm
2
C ommerc ia l Normal1 P hase in A ir
D uke Heat F luxNormal 1 P hase in
Incident Energy Vs. Medium VoltageIn Air @ 25kA 18” Work Distance
V a ria b le M e d iu m V o lta g e , S in g le P h a s e , 2 5 K A A rc in A ir, 6 0 " H o t S tic k W o rk D is ta n c e , A rc G a p 6 " , 1 0 C y c le C le a rin g T im e
0.0
0.2
0 .4
0 .6
0 .8
1 .0
1 .2
2 .40 4.16 12.47 13.80 24.94 34.50 46.00
S o u rce V o lta g e in kV
Cal/C
m2
C om m erc ia l N orm al 1 P has ein A irD uk e H eat F lux N orm al 1P has e in A ir
Incident Energy Vs. Medium VoltageIn Air @ 25kA 60” Work Distance
Flash ProtectionThese tables and information are designed to provide comparativeThese tables and information are designed to provide comparativeinformation concerning the arc/flash hazard.information concerning the arc/flash hazard.
They do not address the hazards associated with any other arc byThey do not address the hazards associated with any other arc by products. products. They also assume the worker is exposed horizontal to the arc locThey also assume the worker is exposed horizontal to the arc location. ation. Workers who are positioned in such a manner as to allow the arc Workers who are positioned in such a manner as to allow the arc to rise to rise towards them will experience a more severe condition. towards them will experience a more severe condition. This information is limited to specific cases as described in thThis information is limited to specific cases as described in the charts. e charts. It can serve to give all workers a better understanding of the iIt can serve to give all workers a better understanding of the intensity of ntensity of electrical arcs and give safety personnel a comparison of the reelectrical arcs and give safety personnel a comparison of the results of the sults of the available calculation methods.available calculation methods.
These values were determined using the input conditions shown with the charts and:1. No automatic reclosure or restrike of arc for medium voltage cases. (Reclosers turned off)2. PPE protection levels are based on data from Table 130.7(C)(11), page 34 NFPA 70E 20043. Comparisons were made using the same input parameters for the calculation methods selected
no other verification was attempted.
REMEMBER NO AMOUNT OF PROTECTION WILL REPLACE AN ALERT WORKERREMEMBER NO AMOUNT OF PROTECTION WILL REPLACE AN ALERT WORKER