Top Banner

of 21

Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

Jun 01, 2018

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    1/53

    ,  

     

    & , ,

    Comparative Study of Different EOR Methods

    . (). (). ()

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    2/53

      010 

    1

     

    W P. T A J (NTNU), M. N C (S),

    M. L H (S) ,

    . W S

    H .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    3/53

      010 

    2

    Table of contents I .........................................................................................................................................................7 

    1.  R S ..........................................................................................................................................7 

    1.1  P R ..............................................................................................................................9 

    1.2  S R ..........................................................................................................................9 

    2.2.1  W I ...........................................................................................................................10 

    2.2.2  G I................................................................................................................................11 

    2.2.3  L P S R P....................12 2.3  T E O R M (EOR)......................................................................13 

    2.3.1  C ....................................................................................................................14 

    2.3.2  M ................................................................................................31 

    2.3.3  T P ......................................................................................................................34 

    2.  T P.................................................................................................................................................36 

    2.1  B ......................................................................................................................................36 

    2.2  A E. .............................................................................................................39 

    2.3  C ..........................................................................................................................46 

    2.3.1  S EOR ......................................................................................................47 

    2.4  R..............................................................................................................................................48 

    3.  C................................................................................................................................................51 

    4.  R .................................................................................................................................................52 

    List of Tables

    T 1: W . ................................................................................................................17 

    T 2: M EOR27

    T 3: N R C 6..................................................................................................39 

    T 4: S EOR 4........................................................................................46 

    T 5: O EOR . E

    ECLIPSE . ...................................................................................................................49 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    4/53

      010 

    3

    T 6: N P V EOR

    . .............................................................................................................................................49 

    T 7: P EOR ...........................50 

    List of Figures 

    F 1: R ..............................................................7 

    F 2: S 3...........................................................................................................9 

    F 3: 2. ........................................................11 

    F 4: D 2........................................11 

    F 5: C EOR 2. .................................................................................14 

    F 6: 7............................................................................................15  

    F 7: S/P 10

    ............................................................................................15  

    F 8: C D ....................................................................16 

    F 9: W . A , C

    . A , C E ..........................................16 

    F 10: S IFT . F / (0.001 /) 5..............19 

    F 11: S 6............................................................................20 

    F 12: T . T

    6. .......................................................................................................20 

    F 13: E IFT 6. ............................................................................20 

    F 14: D

    (IFV) 7........................................................21 

    F 15: S 7. .....................21 

    F 16: S 7.22 

    F 17: S 7................22 

    F 18: T

    7. ....................................................................................................................................23 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    5/53

      010 

    4

    F 19: IFT NC

    7........................................................................................................................................................................24 

    F 20: T IFT 7. .....24 

    F 21: E 6, 12...........................................................................27 

    F 22: H P MEOR 17.................................................................................................................28 

    F 23: S

    . T

    16. .......................................................................................................................................28 

    F 24: S ,

    . T 16. ..............................................29 

    F 25: M 16......................................................................................................29 

    F 26: C .................................................................32 

    F 27: U 3...................................................................................................34 

    F 28: S 3................................................................................................35 

    F 29: I C........................................................................................................36 

    F 30: P , NGL NCS 20072010 A..37 

    F 31: F N C S 4 ............................37 

    F 32: S

    , . B .....................................................38 

    F 33: GO E..........................................................................................40 

    F 34: F G P R E. ..............................................................................40 

    F 35: F O P R E. ................................................................................41 

    F 36: F O P T E. ...............................................................................41 

    F 37: F G P T ..............................................................................................................42 

    F 38: O F3H...............................................................43  

    F 39: O F1H...............................................................43  

    F 40: O .................................................................................44 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    6/53

      010 

    5

    F 41: O .................................................................44 

    F 42: G P T F1H F3H.................................................45 

    F 43: G P T . ...................................................45 

    F 44: O EOR M 11 .........................47 

    F 45: C EOR E. ...................................................................47 

    F 46: O EOR

    ..............................................................................................................................................................49 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    7/53

      010 

    6

    Abstract

    T N C S (NCS)

    . T

    . T N

    .

    A

    (53%), (EOR)

    . S

    ,

    .

    D EOR ET N

    V. C , EOR (MEOR) CO2  N

    R , , .

    T

    .

    A CO 2 

    . A 67.2%

    . H, MEOR S .

    T CO2  N R CO2 

    . C

    .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    8/53

      010 

    7

    Introduction

    T

    . T

    1, 1 :

    1:  

    : T ,

    .

    : N .T , , . T

    50%.

    : T

    . U ,

    , /

    . T 12%

    RF .

    1. Recovery Stages

    A ,

    . T

    :

    1.  V : I

    (M). T

    . M (λ = / )

    .

    1 Reservoir recovery techniques. Kleppe, Jon. Kompendium, NTNU, autumn 2009. Trondheim, Norway

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    9/53

      010 

    8

    W:

     = (D)

     = (D)

    μ & μ = (P)

    A . W

    , , . I

    ,

    2.

    : I . W

    , :

    F,  .

    I ,

    .  V S E, E 

      E , ( ) (

    ).

    2 Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G., Yen, T.F., & Sharma, M.K.; Developments in Petroleum Sciences: EnhancedOil Recovery; Volume 17B: Processes and Operations; Elsevier B.V.; Amsterdam; 1989; pp (1-9)

    agentdisplacingbycontactedoilof Amount

    displacedoilof Amount=

     D E 

    placeinoilof amountTotal

    fluiddisplacingbycontactedoilof Volume=

    V  E 

     I  AV   E  E  E    •=

    area Total

    fluiddisplacingbycontactedArea=

     A E 

    areasectional-cross Total

    fluiddisplacingbycontactedareasectional-Cross=

     I  E 

    o

    ro

    w

    rw

     M 

     µ 

     µ =

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    10/53

      010 

    9

    2: 3 

    T

    .

     

    I

    . T

    . T

    :

      E

      G

      B

      A

    A ,

    . T ,

    .

    T ,

    . T

    . A, ,

    . I ,

    . T

    . C

    . P

    2.

       

    W

    ,

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    11/53

      010 

    10

    . C

    2.

    W ,

    . T :

       

       

    T

    ,

    . T , 2.

    2.2.1 Water Injection

    I ,

    . T

    . I ,

    . U

    . T

    . T

    .

    W :

    1)  F ( ).

    2)  T ,

    .

    T

    () ().

    T , , :

    •  R .

    •  C .

    A . W

    W . T

    . F

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    12/53

      010 

    11

    3 4 ,

    .

    3: 2.

    4: D 2. 

    2.2.2 Gas Injection

    I . T

    1864 D .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    13/53

      010 

    12

    T

    . R

    , ,

    .

    I , ( )

    . G . G

    . T

    .

    T

    . I

    . I ,

    . A ,

    ; ,

    .

    I

    . T

    . T

    .

    2.2.2.1  Identifying a gas injection candidate

    O

    . F

    . I

    ,

    .

    I ,

    . R

    , .

    I

    , .

    2.2.3 Limitations and disadvantages of Primary and Secondary

    Recovery Processes

    •  R

    (5 10 % ).

    •  S ( / ) :

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    14/53

      010 

    13

    R

    U

    W

    L 3 

    ?

    A EOR

    :

      A

      F

      M

      C

      C

      C

    3.

     

    T

    . B EOR

    . I

    ( ), ( ). E

    CO2  . I , EOR

    4.

    T 20 50 %

    . T

    . T .

    T EOR

    ,

    . T EOR :

      C

      T

      M 2

    3 Prof. Ole Torsæter, Kompendiu, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. 

    4 Technology Strategy for Enhanced Recovery; OG21 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    15/53

      010 

    14

    T EOR , 5 EOR

    .

    2.3.1 Chemical processes

    T

    . T EOR . C

    :

    •  S

    •  P

    •  C

    I , ASP (ASP) . T

    . . T

    5. C

    . T

    . T

    .

    5: C 2. 

    5 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Chemicals and Formulations; Akzo Nobel Surface Chemistry; 2006; pp (1-6).

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    16/53

      010 

    15

    T EOR .

    6: 7. 

    I N C S

    (WAG) , EOR

    .

    7: / 10

     

    T

    EOR. R , ,

    . A

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    17/53

      010 

    16

    ,

    . D ,

    ( ) ( )

    6. T

    ( ), ( )

    C N.

    σ  

    κ  

     L

    P N 

    ∆=

    W ΔP/L σ 5.

    I

    , . I

    . D ()

    5.

     

    . T ()

    . C

    . T (θ)

    . T

    . T ,

    . T,

    8.A ,

    . T

    7.

    8: C D

    9: . A , C

    . A , C

    6 Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G. & Yen, T.F.; Developments in Petroleum Sciences: Enhanced Oil Recovery;

    Volume 17A: Fundamentals and Analyses; Elsevier B.V.; Amsterdam; 1989; pp (54-59)7 http://www.statoil.com/en/OurOperations/TradingProducts/CrudeOil/Crudeoilassays/Pages/Norne.aspx  

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    18/53

      010 

    17

    Strength of:

    Contactangle Degree ofwetting Solid/Liquidinteractions

    Liquid/Liquidinteractions

    θ = 0 Perfect wetting strong weak

    strong strong0 < θ <90°

    high wet-abilityweak weak

    90° ≤ θ < 180°

    low wet-ability weak strong

    θ = 180°perfectly non-

    wettingweak strong

    1: 8

    S .

    2.3.1.1  Surfactant Flooding

    T

    . B ,

    .

    S (90 400 ) , 25

    30% 9 27 S3 

    8. I

    , . F N S

    . B

    , ,

    .

    A ,

    . T

    . B ,

    . T

    .

    N R . O

    . I

    ,

    . T

    8 “Recent Advances in Improved Oil Recovey Methods for North Sea Sandstone Reserviors”. Kleppe, Jon,

    Skjæveland, Svein. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Stavanger, 1992.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    19/53

      010 

    18

    , ,

    5.

    B

    103

      /, 1020 % ,

    ,

    EOR 5.

    A :

    . D ,

    :

    1.    T

    ; IFT, , .

    2.  : T

    .

    3.   T

    4.    T .

    5.  /

    6. 

    7.  / 

    W , . D ,

    ()

    . T

    IFT . F EOR

    IFT

    6.

      . O

    . I

    ,

    . T

    , ,

    5.

    T 2030 /

    104

     /,

    1020 % , ,

    EOR 5.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    20/53

      010 

    19

    10: .

    / (0.001 /) 5. 

    T EOR :

      F  C

      A

      E

      O

    A .

    T, , ,

    5.

     2.3.1.1.1  Working mechanism of surfactant molecule to reduce IFT

    W ,

    . D ,

    ()

    . T

    IFT . F EOR

    IFT

    6.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    21/53

      010 

    20

    11: 6. 

    12: .

    6. 

    13: 6. 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    22/53

      010 

    21

    T

    . T

    7.

    14: D

    () 7. 

    15: 7. 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    23/53

      010 

    22

    16: 7. 

    P ( )

    . T

    ,

    . T

    ()

    . A (, )

    EOR. S (NOH)

    14.

    17: 7.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    24/53

      010 

    23

      IFT

    IFT . B

    , IFT .

    18: 7. 

     A

    IFT. A ,

    IFT. T

    . S

    IFT.

    T 7.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    25/53

      010 

    24

    19: C 7. 

    20: 7. 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    26/53

      010 

    25

      F ,

    . L

    , ,

    . M

    . M

    7.

    2.3.1.2  Polymer FloodingP . I

    , N S . T

    . T

    . T . T ,

    , , ,

    τ, ,

     

      

     −=

    τ   µ 

    t P

    exp*  

    I . A , ,

    , .

    G :

      I   R

    A , M

    . I ,

    6.

    P ,

    , . P

    :

      T ,

      T

      T

    6.

    P

      A

      M

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    27/53

      010 

    26

      P, .. 6

     

    N S :

      H

      H

      L (

    )

      T 6.

     2.3.1.2.1   Miceller-polymer flooding technology

    I /

    /

    :1)  P IFT.

    2)  S .

    3)  P

    4)  T: I

    .

    5)  C

    6.

    2.3.1.3  Microbial EOR Methods (MEOR)

    T MEOR

    ( ) . MEOR

    (, .). C

    . O 122.

    T :

    1)  CO2  E

    2)  S /

    3)  A

    4)  C 6

    P :

      R IFT (, , )

      S

      R 6

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    28/53

      010 

    27

    N

       

    S

       

    P

       

      21: 6, 12.

    A , ,

    .

    T :

    1)  M

    ;

    2)  D

    .

    2: 16. 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    29/53

      010 

    28

    MEOR 16.

    W, :

    1) 

    H

    2)  M

    I ,

    . D , . T

    , , CO2. T 16.

    22: 17.

    23:

    .

    16.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    30/53

      010 

    29

    24: ,

    . 16. 

    M 25:

    25: 16.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    31/53

      010 

    30

     2.3.1.3.1   Limitations of MEOR

    W :

    1)  I .2)  P, , , H .

    3)  S , ,

    .

    4)  M P H2S SO2  ,

    .

    B

    EOR 17. 

     2.3.1.3.2 

     Economics of MEOR

      M .

      C .

      I .

      E .

      T MEOR 2  3 $/bbl [17].

    2.3.1.4  Issues related with chemical processes

      .

    &

    4.

     

     

    4.

     

    4, 6

       

    .

    . . ,

    ,

    5. .

    , ,

    6.

     

    6.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    32/53

      010 

    31

    2.3.2 Miscible displacement methods

    T

    . D, , CO2, , , . M

    , .

    I , ,

    , ED, . P

    , , ,

    . W ,

    . T

    /

    . I (IFT) . I

    , .

    I , ,

    . F

    , ()

    , .

    V FCM

    MCM . T , ,

    CO2, , . T , , .

    2.3.2.1  CO2 Flooding

    T CO2  1985 . I

    .

    W , C

    D . I

    2,000 ., CO2  , API 2225 20%. I

    C

    . C

    CO2  ,

    .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    33/53

      010 

    32

    26: C .

    I CO2 ,

    . T

    ( )

    CO2 . O ,

    CO2  . T CO2 

    . T

    . N CO2 

    . T W C

    .

    CO2 

    . I , CO2 

    .

    F CO2, . T :

    •  I •  I

    •  C CO2.

    •  I

    •  W

    • 

    I , CO2 . D

    . I :

    1)  C

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    34/53

      010 

    33

    2)  I CO23)  E .

    T , , / :

    ( )

    c

    c

    o

    o

    co

    c

    k k 

    u µ  µ 

    α  ρ  ρ 

    −=

    sin0439.0 

    W /3, P, ,

    , .

    P

    . A CO2 .

    P CO2.

    CO2  . T CO2 

    . E

    . I ,

    8% CO2  . T CO2 

    , CO2, ,

    2.3.2.2  Inert Gas Flooding

    T

    . P :

    •  P ()

    •  I .

    • 

    T

    :

    1)  P

    2)  I

    3)  M (

    ). N ( ) .

    T . O :,

      P .

      H

      R .

      R .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    35/53

      010 

    34

    2.3.3 Thermal Processes

    W ( 20  API),

    , . F , . T

    . D

    , :

    •  I

    •  S

    2.3.3.1  Steam Injection

    S . C ,

    . S

    . F , 2550%

    . T

    10 11.

    27: 3. 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    36/53

      010 

    35

    28: 3

    2.3.3.2  In Situ Combustion

    F I :

      W

      D O

    D C: T ,

    . A ,

    .

    P

    , ,

    .

    W C: I ,

    . T

    . I , . S . T

    ,

    10.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    37/53

      010 

    36

    29: C.

    2. The Project

     

    T

    ,

    . D , ,

    , , 4.

    T N C S (NCS)

    . T

    , NPD, 800 S3

    (

    ) 2015. E O R (EOR)

    4.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    38/53

      010 

    37

    30: , C 20072010 A

    T NCS 46%

    . T

    , 15.

    T ,

    , WAG ,

    . H, ,

    ,

    4.

    NPD’s prognosis for oil production fromexisting fields, discoveries and prospects

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

      m   i   l   l   S  m   3  o   i   l   /  y  e  a  r

    Oil Reserves

    Inproved

    RecoveryDiscoveries

    NPD's goal:

    800 mill Sm³ (5 bill bbl)

    of increased oil reserves

    by 2015

    Undiscovered oil

      31: C 4 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    39/53

      010 

    38

    32:

    , . B 

    T :

    •  U (

    ).

    •  O (

    ).

    T ,

    . A , ,

    70% .

    A , , ,

    . I

    ,

    2.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    40/53

      010 

    39

       

    A , 2,

    EOR .

    C

    A 32.7 

    0.8619 2530%

    0.21

    %

    503000

    D

    9 C  273

    14.06 S 98 C 

    111

    S3/S

    3: C 6 

    L, E N E

    . D

    .

    •  O .

    •  C

      C F1H.•  C F3H.

    T , .

    M , .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    41/53

      010 

    40

    33: .

    34: .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    42/53

      010 

    41

    35: .

    36: .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    43/53

      010 

    42

    37:

    I

    . T :

    •  T O ( 2010)

    . T

    EOR

    . T

    ,

    EOR . A T

    .

    •  T

    , 38, 41 42.•  T, GO 20% .

    •  A 37, 38 39, I F3H

    10% F1H.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    44/53

      010 

    43

    38: 3.

    39: 1.

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    45/53

      010 

    44

    40: .

    41: .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    46/53

      010 

    45

    42: 1 3.

    43: .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    47/53

      010 

    46

     

    A ECLIPSE ,

    EOR .

    S 3.

    4: 10 

    A :

    •  CO2 

    / .

    •  T CO2  .

    •  S

    .

    •  S/

    / . 10

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    48/53

      010 

    47

    2.3.1 Selection of an EOR method

    T EOR

    , , , ( & ) . 2

    N 45 46

    EOR

    , .

    44: 11 

    45: C . 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    49/53

      010 

    48

    T, EOR

    . T :

    1) 

    CO2

    2)  S

    F ET 9 

    . T

    .

     

    A ,

    ( ). B

    2019 CO2  .

    T 3 46

    ECLIPSE

    .

    W

    (S3/)

    S

    (S3/)

    CO2 

    F

    (S3

    /)

    2010 19000 22420 20900

    2011 18250 21535 20075

    2012 16800 19824 18480

    2013 16500 19470 18150

    2014 15000 17700 16500

    2015 15100 17818 16610

    2016 14300 16874 15730

    2017 13900 16402 15290

    2018 13500 15930 14850

    9 Norne excel spreadsheet for economical evaluation. 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    50/53

      010 

    49

    2019 12100 14278 13310

    5: .

    C .

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    12000

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

    year

        s    m     3     /     d    a    y   WI

    WI w/surf

    WI w/ CO2

      46: .

    F ,

    12. A

    ( ), :

    NPV MMNOK

    M

    B T A T

    W 98 685 25 658

    S 115 277 29 958

    CO2  107 570 27 957

    6: . 

    T , ET

    10

    . F 6. B

    95 000 000 311

     

    10 Gullfaks Village 2010. Gullfaks Sør Omega Project, some cost data and economic assumptions.  

    11 Statoil field development report Norne 2004 

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    51/53

      010 

    50

    M T C

    (3/)

    %

    W 2010 50 350 000 53%W 2019 61 610 000 64.8%

    W

    /2019 63 073 800 66.3%

    CO2  2019 63 862 000 67.2% 7: .

    T , CO 2 

    .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    52/53

      010 

    51

    3. Conclusions

    A :

      S N

    N , .

      C . H,

    90%

    . T,

    . I

    . H

    .

      M EOR .

      CO2 

    .

      M EOR . S

    ( , ) ;

    510 . T

    EOR

    . O

    .

      H . A

    .

      D

    ECLIPE . T

    .

      T EOR

    . I

    .

  • 8/9/2019 Comparative Study of Differente Eor Methd.

    53/53

      010 

    4. References[1] Reservoir Recovery Techniques. Kleppe, Jon. Kompendium. NTNU, autumn 2009.

    Trondheim, Norway.[2]Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G., Yen, T.F., & Sharma, M.K.; Developments in Petroleum

    Sciences: Enhanced Oil Recovery; Volume 17B: Processes and Operations; Elsevier B.V.;

    Amsterdam; 1989; pp (1-9)

    [3] Prof. Ole Torestor Lecture slides of Petroleum Engineering Basic Course

    [4] Technology Strategy for Enhanced Recovery; OG21

    [5] Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Chemicals and Formulations; Akzo Nobel Surface

    Chemistry; 2006; pp (1-6).

    [6] Zolotukhin, A.B. & Ursin, J.R.; Introduction to Petroleum Reservoir Engineering; 1st edition;

    Hoyskole Forlaget AS Norwegian Academic Press; Kristiansand, Norway; 2000; pp (315-355)

    [7] Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G. & Yen, T.F.; Developments in Petroleum Sciences:

    Enhanced Oil Recovery; Volume 17A: Fundamentals and Analyses; Elsevier B.V.; Amsterdam;

    1989; pp (54-59)

    [8] Butt, H.J., Graf, K. & Kappl, M.; Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces; Wiley-VCH;

    Weinheim, Germany; 2003

    [9]http://www.statoil.com/en/OurOperations/TradingProducts/CrudeOil/Crudeoilassays/Pages/N

    orne.aspx 

    [10] Green, D.W & Willhite, G.P.; Enhanced Oil Recovery; Society of Petroleum Engineers;

    Texas; 1998; pp (1-2)

    [11] J:J: Taber, F.D.Martin, R.S.Seight: "EOR screening criterioa revisited-Part1", SPEReservoir Engineering, August 1997.

    [12] Donaldson, E.C., Chilingarian, V.G. & Yen, T.F.; Developments in Petroleum Sciences:

    Enhanced Oil Recovery; Volume 22: Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery; Elsevier B.V.;

    Amsterdam; 1989

    [13] http://www.npd.no/en/news/Production-figures/2010/January-2010/  

    [14] http://www.npd.no/en/topics/improved-recovery/temaartikler/why-do-we-not-recover-100-

    per-cent-of-the-oil/  

    [15] http://www.heavyoilinfo.com/feature_items/thai/expert-viewpoint-2013-thai-in-situ-

    combustion. 

    [16] M. M. Schumcher; Enhanced Recovery of Residual and Heavy Oil; 2nd

     edition; Noyes Data

    Corporation; Park Ridge, New Jersey, USA;1980; pp.32-64

    [18] Presentation on ‘Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery’ at University of Cairo