Top Banner
Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments R.C. Sharma 1 , A.I. Morgounov 2 , H.J. Braun 2 , B. Akin 2 , M. Keser 1 , D. Bedoshvili 1,2 , A. Bagci 3 , M. van Ginkel 1 , A. Yahyaoui 1 , S. Rajaram 1 1 ICARDA; 2 CIMMYT; 3 Celcuk Univ., Turkey
23

Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Feb 04, 2016

Download

Documents

Rasha

Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments. R.C. Sharma 1 , A.I. Morgounov 2 , H.J. Braun 2 , B. Akin 2 , M. Keser 1 , D. Bedoshvili 1,2 , A. Bagci 3 , M. van Ginkel 1 , A. Yahyaoui 1 , S. Rajaram 1. 1 ICARDA; 2 CIMMYT; 3 Celcuk Univ., Turkey. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under

dryland and irrigated environments

R.C. Sharma1, A.I. Morgounov2, H.J. Braun2, B. Akin2, M. Keser1, D. Bedoshvili1,2, A. Bagci3, M.

van Ginkel1, A. Yahyaoui1, S. Rajaram1

1ICARDA; 2CIMMYT; 3Celcuk Univ., Turkey

Page 2: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Abbreviations

• IWWIP :

International Winter Wheat Improvement Program• IWWYT :

International Winter Wheat Yield Trial• SA : Semi-arid• IR : Irrigated• CWANA: Central and West Asia and North Africa

Page 3: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

International Winter Wheat Program (IWWIP)

Cooperative winter wheat breeding program:

• Ministry of Agric. and Rural Affairs, Turkey

• CIMMYT

• ICARDA

Page 4: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

0.6 Mha6.5 Mha

4.0 Mha0.4 Mha

3.9 Mha

0.8 Mha

Page 5: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments
Page 6: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Objectives

• Compare grain yield of wheat genotypes targeted to irrigated and semi-arid environments in the IWWIP

• Examine high yielding wheat genotypes under low and high productive environments for their specific and broad adaptation

Page 7: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Materials and Methods

• IWWYT – SA • IWWYT – IR

• Comparison of grain yield levels of genotypes in IWWYT-SA and IWWYT-IR evaluated under similar management conditions

• Comparison of grain yield levels of genotypes in IWWYT-SA tested under low and high productive environments

Page 8: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Edirne

AdapazariAnkara

Konya Adana

Eskisehir

Erzurum

Diyarbakir

SWWW

Research Stations in Turkey contributing to the Turkey – CIMMYT – ICARDA

International Winter Wheat Improvement Program

Aleppo

Izmir

Samsun

Page 9: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Ankara

Eskisehir

SWWW

IWWIP framework in Turkey: F4 and Head Rows

Aleppo

IzmirF1

F2F3

F4,HR

Page 10: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

EdirneAdapazari

Ankara

Konya Adana

Eskisehir

Erzurum

Diyarbakir

SWWW

IWWIP framework : PYT

Aleppo

Izmir

Samsun

F4,HR

PYT

PYT

PYTPYT

PYT

Page 11: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

EdirneAdapazari

Ankara

Konya

Adana

Eskisehir

Erzurum

Diyarbakir

IWWIP framework : Yield Trials

Aleppo

Izmir

Samsun

YT&AYT

PYT

YT&AYT

YT&AYT

YT&AYT

YT&AYT

YT&AYT

Tashkent

YT&AYT2010

Page 12: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Edirne

SWWW

IWWIP framework in Turkey: seed multiplication for international distribution

Aleppo Konya

Central AsiaUSA & S. America

W. Europe Russia & E. Europe

WANA

China

Page 13: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Breeding methodologyIWWIP framework in Turkey and germplasm

movement

Location Yield Potential

Drought tolerance

Cold tolerance

Yellow rust

Leaf rust

Quality

Adana +

Adapazari +

Aleppo + + + +

Ankara + + + +

Diyarbakir +

Edirne + +

Erzurum + +

Eskisehir + +

Izmir +

Konya + +

Samsun

S. Urfa +

Total sites 9 5 1 2 2 2

Page 14: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

• Mean grain yield (t/ha) under similar management

IWWYT-SA IWWYT-IR

Portugal-07 5.31 5.54

Armenia-08 3.25 3.33

Russia-08 6.16 5.47

Serbia-08 8.01 8.90

Uzbekistan-08 5.32 4.89

Uzbekistan-09 4.62 5.55

Study 1: IWWYT-SA vs. IWWYT-IR

Page 15: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

• Highest grain yield (t/ha) under similar management

IWWYT-SA IWWYT-IR

Portugal-07 7.49 7.52 (0%)

Armenia-08 4.20 4.75 (+12%)

Russia-08 8.13 7.53 (-8%)

Serbia-08 9.96 10.16 (+2%)

Uzbekistan-08 6.55 6.05 (-8%)

Uzbekistan-09 6.43 6.75 (+5%)

Study 1: IWWYT-SA vs. IWWYT-IR

Page 16: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Performance of wheat lines under irrigated management in

Uzbekistan - 2009Type of genotype

Mean Yield(t/ha)

Highest Yield(t/ha)

Days to Maturity

Plant Height(cm)

1000-kernel wt.

(g)

Irrigated(8 Varieties) 6.33 a† 7.58 ab 193 a 87 ab 41.6 a

Semi-arid(10 Varieties) 6.18 a 7.91 a 193 a 95 a 42.6 a

Commercial(5 Varieties) 5.34 b 7.16 b 193 a 81 b 42.2 a

† Values within a column followed by different letters significantly at P =0.05 based on DMRT

Page 17: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 7th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2005

EntryNo.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Entry No.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Low productivity (< 3 t/ha) High productivity (>3 t/ha)

7-13Eskina-6 2132 7-12 JI5418/Maras 4968

7-12JI5418/Maras 2130 7-11 TAM200/Kauz 4735

Check Mercan-1 2061 7-13 Eskina-6 4577

7-11 TAM200/Kauz 2038 7-09HAA88-89-18/4105W//TRK13

4482

7-23 Tranca-4 2025 7-23 Tranca-4 4475

Page 18: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

EntryNo.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Entry No.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Low productivity (< 3 t/ha) High productivity (> 3 t/ha)

Check Bagci-2000 2.903 8-25

Tast/Sprw/4/Rom-Tast/Bon/3/Dibo//SU92/CI13645/5/F130L1.12

6.533

8-19Ngda146/4/Ymh/Tob//Mcd/3/Lira/5/F130L1.12

2.823 8-15Saulesku #44/ TR810200

6.232

Check Gerek-79 2.630 8-21 Bilinmiyen96.27 6.213

Check Dagdas-94 2.573 8-11Saulesku #44/ TR810200

6.198

8-15Saulesku #44/ TR810200

2.573 8-08Saulesku #44/ TR810200

6.179

Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 8th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2006

Page 19: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

EntryNo.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Entry No.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Low productivity (< 3 t/ha) High productivity (> 3 t/ha)

9-17 YE2453//PPBB68/Chrc 2.435 9-09 Gun91/Pobeda//F900K 5.856

9-16 YE2453//PPBB68/Chrc 2.193 9-23Alpu-1/3/ Chen/Ae.sq.(Taus)//Bcn

5.685

9-13 Agri/Bjy//Vee/3/Prinia 2.174 9-15CA8055//KS82W409/ Stephens

5.349

9-24 Savalan/Grk//Pyn/Bau 2.087 9-20Tirchmir2/5/Cnn/Kkv/KC66/3/Skp35/4/Vee/6/KS82W409/Stephens

5.212

9-19

MV17/5/C126-15/Cofn/3/N10B/P14//P101/4/21183/Co652643//Lcr/KS6

1.945 9-10 Gun91/Pobeda//F900K 5.174

Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 9th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2007

Page 20: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

EntryNo.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Entry No.

PedigreeYield(t/ha)

Low productivity (< 3 t/ha) High productivity (> 3 t/ha)

10-17Bul Everdika/ Stozher/4/Tast/Sprw//CA8055/3/Csm

2.209 10-19338-K1-1//Anb/Buc/3/GS50A

6.608

Check Gerek-79 2.201 10-10 F130-L-1-12/Lagos 6.604

10-13 Pyn/Bau/3/Agri/Bjy//Vee 2.122 10-13Pyn/Bau/3/Agri/Bjy//Vee

6.511

10-24AU/CO652337//2*CA8-155/3/F474S1-1.1

2.113 10-21ERYT1489.87 (Don Polukarlikovaya/Olvia)/3/2*Agri/Bjy//Vee

6.427

Check Bayraktar 2.104 10-20Agri/Bjy//Vee/3/Gun91/4/Cham6//1D13.1/Mlt

6.370

Study 2: Highest yielding genotypes in the 10th IWWYT-SA under low and high productive environments, 2008

Page 21: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Conclusions Grain yield of highest yielding genotypes in IWWYT-

IR and IWWYT-SA are comparable under irrigated management

Certain genotypes developed for dryland also possess yield potential that could efficiently utilize management practices for irrigated management

In general, different sets of genetic materials are needed under strictly semi-arid and irrigated environments

A few lines targeted towards stressed conditions in fact possess yield plasticity resulting in their superior performance both under dryland and irrigated conditions

Page 22: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Acknowledgement

• IWWIP partners

• IWWP collaborators

More information: www.iwwip.org

Page 23: Comparative performance of winter wheat genotypes under dryland and irrigated environments

Thank You