Top Banner
Opening a new production site of the Finnish leather goods brand "Happy Feet" in Romania
38

Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Apr 12, 2017

Download

Marketing

Stefan Ang
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Opening a new production site of the Finnish leather goods brand "Happy Feet" in Romania

Page 2: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

The Company

• ”Happy Feet”• Finnish leather goods manufacturer

Page 3: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Goal

• Growth of the market share in south & south-eastern Europe

• Focal point: Romania

Page 4: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Market Analysis

• Competition from established brands: Rieker, Vagabond, Gabor...

• Lower income level than Northern Europe

Page 5: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Market Entry Strategy

Page 6: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Strategy Implementation

• Opening of a production factory in south-eastern Europe -> Romania

Page 7: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Financial Advantages

• Low production costs• Low transportation costs• Market presence

Page 8: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Business Advantages

• 15 years work experience in the Romanian leather goods industry

• Knowledge of local culture• Connections with local

companies & suppliers

Page 9: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Key Economic Indicators - GDP

• Economical growth from 2009

Page 10: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Key Economic Indicators - Inflation

• Economic stability from 2007

Page 11: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Key Economic Indicators - Unemployment

• Decreasing levels

Page 12: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Key Economic Indicators - Exports

• Growing trend

Page 13: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Key Economic Indicators - Imports

• Decreasing trend

Page 14: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Costs of Starting a Business

• Starting costs in Romania = ½ starting costs in Finland

Page 15: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Barriers To Entry

• Rival companies could have factories which may compete with us

• Cultural differences

• Bureaucracy

Page 16: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Cultural Environment

• Geert Hofstede’s theory of comparing six dimensions of the two countries

Page 17: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Power Distance: Finland

• Romania: strong culture of power hierarchy

• Finland: accessibility and transparency of hierarchical structure

• => implementation of Finnish culture

Page 18: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Individualism: Romania

• Romanian culture based on:– Interaction and communication– Sharing– Companionship

• => Implementing the Romanian culture will benefit productivity

Page 19: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Masculinity: Romania

• Romania: competitive stimulation

• => Encourage healthy competition• => Acknowledge high quality work and

professionalism• => Promote knowledge sharing

Page 20: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Uncertainty Avoidance: Romania

• Romania: higher uncertainty avoidance

• Positive effects: people are less likely to initiate job changes

• => Higher stability for the company• => Less investment in training new

employees

Page 21: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Pragmatism: Romania

• Higher level of pragmatism in Romania

• => Better ability of accepting societal change and innovation

Page 22: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Indulgence: Finland & Romania

• High level => instability• Low level => rigidity

• Right balance of indulgence leads to:– Empowering people through freedom of

self expression– Clear managerial direction through strong

and healthy leadership

Page 23: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

PESTEL Analysis

• PESTEL analysis is used to create an overview of the external environment of the market we want to enter

Page 24: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

PESTEL Analysis - Polytics

• Stable political environment

• Growing support of new enterprises and local producers

Page 25: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

PESTEL Analysis - Economy

• Stable economical environment• Cheaper raw materials than in the rest of

Europe• Supporting local suppliers• Prices set in Euros

Page 26: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

PESTEL Analysis – Socio-Cultural

• Centuries old tradition in the leather industry

• Skilled employees

Page 27: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

PESTEL Analysis - Technology

• Stable technology and techniques, compared with other industries

Page 28: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

PESTEL Analysis - Environment

• Adopt a socially responsible business strategy business model

• Become involved in the community by supporting the local animal breeders and supply chain

• => ”Customer loyalty, employee commitment and business performance”

Page 29: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

PESTEL Analysis - Legal

• Quality working conditions

• Attractive salary scheme based on professionalism

• Higher salary than the competition, still creates savings for the company compared with salaries in Finland

Page 30: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Porter’s 5 Forces Model

• Analysis of the competitive power in the industry through:– Supplier Power– Buyer Power– Threat of Substitution– Threat of New Entry

Page 31: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

The 5 Fs – Supplier Power

• Raw supply materials: leather, lining, thread, glue, dyes, zippers, accessories...

• Local suppliers

• Strategy: developing long-term relationships with suppliers based on mutual trust and gain

Page 32: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

The 5 Fs – Employee / Buyer Power

• Business values promoted and valued in the Romanian market:– Environment protection– Ethical behaviour– Supporting local companies and suppliers

• Strategy: creating an employee / customer loyalty programme to minimize the buyer / employee power

Page 33: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

The 5 Fs – Threat of New Entries and Substitution of Products

• Strategies to gain an advantage over the potential competition and new products:

– Creating a brand recognised for social awareness and support of local suppliers

– Customer loyalty strategy– Lower prices than the competition– Quality products

Page 34: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Market Entry Mode• Direct Investment entry mode =• Wholly Owned Subsidiary (WOS) = • Private Limited (PL)

• => A sole venture with full ownership by the parent Finnish company

Page 35: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Marketing Mix

Page 36: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Marketing MixProduct / Price

• Lower production costs due to:

– Cheaper labor– Cheaper raw materials– Cheaper equipment maintenance– Shorter distance to the client

Page 37: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Marketing MixPlace / Promotion

• Good working conditions:

– Clean and safe work environment– Quality equipment– Better salaries– Job flexibility: training and job rotation– Financial reward schemes

Page 38: Comparative market analysis Finland vs Romania

Thank You!